HomeMy WebLinkAbout01/31/1991 Meeting
e
e
e
M I NUT E S
Eugene City Council
Rogue Room--Valley River Inn
January 31, 1991
5:30 p.m.
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Roger Rutan, Shawn Boles, Ruth Bascom, Bobby Green,
Randy MacDonald, Debra Ehrman, Paul Nicholson, Kaye
Robi nette.
The adjourned meeting of January 30, 1991, of the Eugene City Council was
called to order by His Honor Mayor Jeff Miller.
I. PROCESS SESSION
Facilitator Sharon Thorne outlined the process that the council would be
following for this session. The agenda included group introductions, shared
statements of expectations, generation of process issues, discussion of what
activities might lead to more effective working relationships, and what
commitments councilors will be willing to make to enhance this relationship.
Councilors shared information about themselves and talked about what they
perceive to be the most important accomplishments the council can make in the
coming year.
(At 7 p.m., the council took a short break.)
The council briefly reviewed council ground rules and generated a list of
specific issues for discussion.
A. New Councilors Briefed on Issues
The council recognized that with three new councilors on board there may be
times when the council discusses an issue which it has discussed and/or
already taken action on in the past. Concern was raised that new councilors
might not be aware of or fully understand the extent of past discussion that
has guided the issue. The council discussed ways in which it might prevent
unnecessary rehashing of past discussion.
Ms. Bascom noted that on issues such as this, it will be important for new
councilors to follow the lead of old councilors and to trust that those who
were previously involved understand the issue and are taking the best
possible action based on that information.
The council discussed and agreed that all councilors should be fully briefed
on issues before the meeting. For the most part, the information contained
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
Quarterly Process Session
January 31, 1991
Page 1
e
e
e
within the council agenda packet is sufficient for making an informed
decision. If an individual councilor needs additional information, it is his
or her responsibility to initiate contact with staff or another councilor in
advance to answer any questions.
Mr. Nicholson pointed out that there may be times when new councilors do not
agree on the basic policy assumptions that guided the decision. He asked the
council to be tolerant of a need to discuss these policies which might
possibly lead the council to reject what was once status quo.
B. Philosophical Discussions
Ms. Bascom commented that sometimes the council gets bogged down in a
wide-ranging philosophical discussion when it needs to focus on a specific
goal or action.
In order to help the council stay on target on an issue, council requested
that staff provide clear direction to council about what type of decision is
being requested.
The council discussed this issue and felt that it might be beneficial to hold
the philosophical discussion at a different time than the action decision.
It reached consensus that a philosophical discussion must have the support of
at least two councilors prior to bringing it to the floor at a future
meeting.
Mr. MacDonald reiterated a point made earlier by Mr. Nicholson that
councilors need to be aware that the will of the council may have changed
with three new councilors. The basic philosophical assumptions that the
council may have relied on to make decisions may no longer be true and may
require review. While it is important that the council move toward action on
issues, it is important that the council continue to have these philosophical
discussions.
C. Personalizing
This issue was raised in response to recent incidences of personalizing which
have taken place during council meetings. Ms. Ehrman emphasized the need to
avoid making public those comments or criticisms which could better be made
in private.
The council discussed the different positions and personal styles that exist
among the council. It agreed that councilors should avoid being overly
sensitive to comments which were not intended to harm.
Mr. Boles pointed out that when councilors are making a case for an issue, it
is not helpful for councilors to site a large, unnamed constituency that
supports a particular position. Councilors agreed to make an effort to speak
for themselves on issues and to avoid disguising statements as questions.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
Quarterly Process Session
January 31, 1991
Page 2
.
e
D. Postponement
Mr. Boles asked that the council be careful not to add items to the agenda
and take action on them without the opportunity for full council involvement.
The council discussed its ground rules regarding postponement of an item.
Council ground rules permit councilors to request postponement of an agenda
item. The council reached consensus that individual councilors should make
it clear in advance if they want to reschedule an item. Staff noted that a
list of upcoming agenda items is attached to the Council Newsletter and urged
the council to review this list to make this determination.
E. Time Limits
The council discussed ways in which to make the meeting times as valuable as
possible and to ensure that the council remains on task during discussion.
Noting that the Mayor is responsible for facilitating the discussion, the
council requested that he be particularly cognizant of time limitations.
Specifically, it asked that he terminate discussion when it becomes
repetitive and that he provide staff with a clear summary of the action that
the council wishes to take on an issue.
Mr. Nicholson acknowledged the need to work within time limits, but stressed
the importance of not allowing a time line to force the council into making a
premature decision. If there is a value or need for further discussion,
e action on the item should be postponed to a later date.
F. Appointment Process for Boards and Commissions
The council discussed its appointment process for boards and commissions.
Traditionally, it is the Mayor's responsibility to appoint, with council
approval, board and commission members. The council highlighted several
problematic instances that have occurred recently in the appointment process.
The council discussed ways in which it might prevent this type of incident
from taking place in the future and agreed that it would require the
commitment of both the Mayor and'council.
Mr. MacDonald spoke about the need for increased communication between the
council and the Mayor regarding the appointment process.
The council agreed that when the Mayor nominates citizens to boards and
commissions, information about the nomination should be shared with the
council. If the Mayor feels particularly strong about the nomination, this
should be conveyed as well.
The council also discussed its responsibilities in the nomination process.
It.realized that it is the council's obligation to inform the Mayor well in
advance of any concerns it has with a nomination.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
Quarterly Process Session
January 31, 1991
Page 3
e
Alluding to the process which was followed for the Tree Commission
appointment, Ms. Ehrman emphasized that prospective appointments should not
be brought before the boards and commissions for review or recommendation.
Mayor Miller stated that it should be implicit council policy not to
reappoint an individual to a board or commission who has resigned from that
position in protest.
The council discussed the constituency of boards and commissions.
Specifically, it discussed whether persons who hold contrary positions would
be an asset or an obstacle to commission work. Mr. Nicholson felt that an
adversary's position would be of benefit to the commission because it would
encourage the group to have a broader perspective of the issues. Other
councilors felt that such an appointment would likely obstruct commission
work. The council agreed that because each prospective appointee brings a
slightly different background and viewpoint to an issue, it would need to
review this type of appointment on a case-by-case basis.
G. Staff/Council Relations
e
Mr. Nicholson voiced concern with the way lay citizens are being treated in
the public process. Specifically, he expressed concern with the amount of
staff input that is allowed on an issue and said that the material is being
presented in a way which might be offensive to many citizens. He suggested
that out of respect for the work of boards and commissions, all
recommendations should be passed directly to council without staff
intervention.
Mr. Rutan disagreed with Mr. Nicholson. He felt that it is beneficial for
the council to encourage the staff, as informed professionals, to advise the
council on its actions.' He pointed out, however, that it is also each
councilor's responsibility to fully examine and evaluate each staff
recommendation.
Mr. Gleason remarked that the council has given clear direction in the past
about the preferred format for staff presentations. However, he noted that
it is appropriate for the council to be alert and to bring to the attention
of staff, any concerns regarding the "filtering" of material. It is the goal
of staff to remain as objective as possible.
The council agreed that this item is worthy of more discussion and should be
raised at a future process session.
H. Councilors' Positions and the Public Record
Mr. MacDonald voiced frustration that he has not been given the opportunity
to clearly state his position on an issue at past council sessions. He felt
that it is important that his position on an issue be clearly stated during
council discussion so that it can become part of the public record. The
council acknowledged Mr. MacDonald's concern and suggested that for future
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
Quarterly Process Session
January 31, 1991
Page 4
council sessions, statements of position on an issue be presented prior to
4Ia taking final action.
At 9:20 p.m., the meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
_~~-r1
Micheal Gleason
City Manager
(Recorded by Traci Northman)
mncc 013191-QPS
e
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
Quarterly Process Session
January 31, 1991
Page 5