HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/13/1991 Meeting (2)
e
e
e
M I NUT E S
Eugene City Council
Council Chamber--Eugene City Hall
May 13, 1991
7:30 p.m.
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Shawn Boles, Ruth Bascom, Debra Ehrman, Bobby Green,
Randy MacDonald, Paul Nicholson, Kaye Robinette.
COUNCILORS ABSENT: Roger Rutan.
The adjourned meeting of May 8, 1991, of the Eugene City Council was called
to order by His Honor Mayor Jeff Miller.
I. PUBLIC FORUM
Members of the Cascade Chorus serenaded the council and announced that, in
recognition of Mayas Harmony Month, there would be a celebration at the Hult
Center on May 18.
II. CONSENT CALENDAR: AMENDMENTS TO METROPOLITAN WASTEWATER COMMISSION
AGREEMENT
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to amend the Metro-
politan Wastewater Commission Intergovernmental Agreement
regarding sewer service in Eugene and Springfield, which will
allow extension of sewer service to the River Road and Santa
Clara areas. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
7:0.
III. SECOND READING: ORDINANCE CONCERNING TCI CABlEVISION, INC.
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and said that Randy Kolb,
Information Services Director, was present to answer questions.
CB 4300--An ordinance granting to TCI Cablevision of Oregon,
Inc., a renewal of its non-exclusive franchise for
the operation of a cable communications system only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 1
e
Ms. Ehrman noted that she continues to receive comments from citizens who are
concerned with lack of control over cable programming and said that she has
encouraged citizens to communicate these concerns to TCI directly.
Mr. MacDonald said he has also received citizen complaints with respect to
programming and noted that he continues to be frustrated with the inability
of local government to influence programming and rate setting. He stated
that he has received approximately 100 signatures from citizens who are con-
cerned with the loss of cable access to the San Francisco Giant games. Citi-
zens have also expressed concern that the customer survey mechanism put out
by TCI is ineffective. He is concerned with the length of the franchise and
the near-compulsory extension. Mr. MacDonald said that the council should
send the franchise proposal back to the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC)
for further negotiation.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Kolb said that in provisions
specified in the 1984 Cable Act, if the City chooses not to accept the nego-
tiated contract, TCI would be permitted to operate under the existing fran-
chise agreement with an automatic franchise extension. '
Mr. Boles said that because he believes that the proposed franchise agreement
is superior to the existing agreement, he would be supporting the motion. He
suggested that the council flag the issue of lack of local control over pro-
gramming for the Intergovernmental Relations Department (IGR) to discuss
during its next trip to Washington DC.
4It Ms. Bascom said that she shares Mr. MacDonald's concerns with respect to the
proposed franchise agreement, but noted that until Federal legislation is
changed, local government has little control over programming issues.
e
Mayor Miller pointed out that this is a non-exclusive franchise agreement.
If it were cost-effective for another company to compete with TCI for local
cable programming, they could do so.
Mr. Nicholson said that he would be opposing the contract in objection to the
City's lack of real control over the whole negotiation process.
Mr. Green said that while he would like to see more culturally diverse pro-
gramming, he feels that TCI has been responsive to community input; he would
be voting in favor of the motion.
Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0.
Council Bill 4300 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; in a 5:2
vote with councilors Boles, Ehrman, Green, Bascom, and
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 2
e
e
e
Robinette voting in favor, and councilors MacDonald and Nicholson voting
against, the bill was declared passed (and became Ordinance 19775).
IV. ORDINANCE: METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS REGARDING BLUE
WATER BOATS
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and said staff was available
to answer questions.
CB 4305--An ordinance amending the Eugene-Springfield Metro-
politan Area General Plan to enlarge the urban growth
boundary of the City of Springfield by adding Tax
lots 401, 402, 403, and 405--Assessor's Map 17-02-8;
applying new land use designations to the property;
amending the text of the plan; and adopting a savings
and severability clause.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time.
Mr. MacDonald recognized that the Blue Water Boats expansion would make a
significant economic impact on Springfield, but said that he would be voting
against the proposal because of the negative impact on natural resource val-
ues in the surrounding area. He also said that the limited nature of boat
testing would not justify expanding the urban growth boundary.
Ms. Ehrman said that she would be voting against the proposal because the
applicant has not justified the need for an urban growth boundary expansion.
She also noted that there are no assurances that Blue Water Boats would re-
main on that site and pointed out that once the zoning designation was
changed, it would be difficult to change.
Ms. Bascom voiced support for the proposal and noted that the three planning
commissions, the Springfield City Council, and the lane County Board of Com-
missioners had already approved the plan.
Mr. Nicholson noted that he has had an ex parte contact with Eugene Planning
Commissioner Ken Tollenaar over issues already contained in the record. He
echoed Mr. MacDonald's concerns.
Mr. Boles said that he has had an ex parte contact with Eugene Planning Com-
missioner Greg Evans; the conversation would not affect his ability to make
an impartial decision. He agreed with Ms. Ehrman that the applicant has
failed to justify the need for an urban growth boundary expansion and indi-
cated that there was adequate industrial land within the urban growth bounda-
ry when the applicant purchased this land.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 3
e
e
e
Mr. Robinette offered his support for the motion and indicated that the Plan-
ning Commission, whose job it is to advise the council on land use issues,
has approved the proposal.
Mayor Miller said that he believes Blue Water Boats has demonstrated the
economic benefits that would be gained in the community from plant expansion.
He noted that it appears that the vote would be 4:3, denying the request,
but said that he believes that Councilor Rutan, if present, would vote in
favor of the motion. He asked the council to delay final action on this
issue until Mr. Rutan could be present.
Responding to a request for process clarification, Tim Sercombe, City Attor-
ney's Office, said that the council must take action on the ordinance within
30 days of the pubic hearing. If the motion is defeated, the ordinance would
go back to MPC for dispute resolution. In order to formalize an ordinance
denial, the council would need to adopt denial findings. If denial findings
are made prior to MPC action and MPC fails to return with a different propos-
al, the denial could stand.
Mr. Gleason said that council ground rules have traditionally allowed an item
to be held over at the request of a councilor. Also, any two councilors can
request that an issue be postponed to the following meeting.
Ms. Ehrman noted that Councilor Rutan did not request that this item be held
over. The council policy which allows two councilors to request that an
issue be held over should not apply in this case, because the councilors did
not make such a request before the full council had shown its position on the
issue.
Ms. Bascom warned the council that voting to deny a request on land for which
Springfield has jurisdiction would likely cause tension across the jurisdic-
tions. Also, she believes that if Councilor Rutan had been aware that the
proposal would be denied, he would have asked that the issue be held over.
Mr. MacDonald acknowledged that some tension might be created by denying the
request, but emphasized that Metro Plan boundaries are jointly agreed upon.
Mr. Green moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to call the question.
The motion carried 5:2; with councilors Green, Boles, Ehrman,
MacDonald, and Nicholson in favor, and councilors Bascom and
Robinette opposed.
Roll call vote; lacking unanimous approval, the motion failed
5:2, with councilors Boles, Ehrman, Green, MacDonald, and
Nicholson voting in favor, and councilors Bascom and Robinette
voting opposed.
Responding to a request for process clarification, Bill Gary, City Attorney's
Office, indicated that to deny the motion means to deny each portion of the
motion separately. Unless the vote is reversed, the council cannot vote on
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 4
e
the issue until Council Bill 4305 has been read in full and enactment cannot
be considered at this time.
Mr. Green said that it would be unfair to the applicant to delay a decision
on the issue. After viewing the site in question, he said that he believes
that the property would be better used by Blue Water Boats and would support
a Metro Plan amendment.
Ms. Ehrman moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to reconsider the
motion.
Ms. Bascom said that she is confident that this issue will come back to the
council after it is heard by MPC.
Mr. MacDonald said he does not believe that it would be out of order for two
councilors to request that this item be held over until a later meeting. He
said that council ground rules and procedures should be a topic of discussion
at the next quarterly process session.
The motion to reconsider carried unanimously, 7:0.
The motion on the first reading carried unanimously, 7:0.
e
Council Bill 4305 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; in a 3:4
decision the bill failed, with councilors Bascom, Robinette,
and Green voting in favor, and councilors Boles, Ehrman,
MacDonald, and Nicholson voting opposed.
V. ORDINANCE: METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS REGARDING GOOD
NEIGHBOR CARE CENTERS, INC.
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and said that staff was avail-
able to answer questions.
CB 4306--An ordinance amending the Eugene-Springfield Metro-
politan Area General Plan to redesignate property
identified as Assessor's Map 17-02-3 1, Tax lots 300
and 700, from light-medium and heavy industrial land
use to a combination of medium-density residential,
light-medium industrial and commercial land uses; and
adopting a savings and severability clause.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
7:0.
-
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 5
~ Council Bill 4306 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be
approved and given final passage.
e
-
Ms. Ehrman said that while she would like to support the proposed change, the
applicant has not justified the need to change the land-use designation. She
stated that there are no guarantees that the plan would succeed, but once the
decision to redesignate the land has been made, it could not easily be
changed. She also noted that there is currently a shortage of large parcels
of industrial land which are in single ownership.
Ms. Bascom said she is opposed to the amendment, noting that the proposed
site would not be a desirable location for housing.
Mr. Boles said that because the property in question lies within the urban
growth boundary this issue is different from the last issue. He offered his
support for the motion because he feels that the applicant has made a compel-
ling case for the rational reutilization of the property, particularly in
light of the fact that it has been vacant for some time.
Mr. Robinette said that the Planning Commission's denial of the request
should be upheld.
Mr. MacDonald commented on the financial barriers that exist with respect to
the construction of affordable housing. He said that he recognizes the need
for affordable housing in the community, and would support the proposal.
Mr. Nicholson said that in changing the land-use designation, the council
would be subsidizing the project by making this land more valuable. He said
he shares Ms. Ehrman's concerns that the success of the project cannot be
guaranteed.
Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Sercombe said that similar
to the process that was followed with the Riverfront Research Park, it would
be possible to create a special land-use category that describes the particu-
lar uses that would be allowed on this site, changing the text and diagram of
the Metro Plan to accommodate that change. Also, the applicant could limit
the use of the land by agreeing to place a deed restriction upon its use.
Such a process could be the result of an MPC negotiation process.
Mr. Gleason noted that the Riverfront Research Park development has an asso-
ciated master plan. He said that it would not be practical for the City to
develop a complete master plan to accommodate the development.
Roll call vote; in a 3:4 decision, the bill failed, with coun-
cilors Boles, MacDonald, and Nicholson voting in favor and
councilors Bascom, Robinette, Green, and Ehrman voting op-
posed.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 6
e
Mr. MacDonald suggested that MPC negotiations consider additional buffering
of the property, developer commitments regarding commercial zoning, and fur-
ther study of issues surrounding the chemical plant located to the west of
the site.
Ms. Ehrman asked that MPC also discuss the school district's ability to meet
the demands of additional capacity should the development be approved.
Mayor Miller suggested that MPC discussions also consider additional buffer-
ing from the chemical plant and explore whether additional moderate-income
housing should be provided.
Mr. Gleason said that all three jurisdictions should reevaluate the decision
to simplify the Metro Plan amendment process by hearing site-specific plan
amendments. The jurisdictions should consider the damage which is being done
to the comprehensive nature of the plan in going through such a process.
Responding to a question, Mr. Gleason said that before the process was re-
vised, plan amendments were only entertained during specific update periods.
A joint body reviewed the proposals and rejected those they did not support,
providing a more extensive review process for proposals which were denied.
Mr. MacDonald suggested that whenever a jurisdiction is co-applicant to a
Metro Plan change, staff from that jurisdiction not be permitted to make the
presentation.
e
Ms. Ehrman said that MPC has discussed the awkward nature of the Metro Plan
amendment process. Some procedural changes have been suggested for joint
elected officials meetings in the future, in particular it has been suggested
that all bodies be present for the deliberation of the issue, even when they
cannot take final action on an issue.
Mr. Boles said that he hoped that MPC will return to the council with sugges-
tions about how it can get back on track with respect to General Plan up-
dates.
VI. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE AND METHODOLOGY REGARDING SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. les lyle, Public Works De-
partment, gave a brief staff presentation. He said that since the April 26
work session on Systems Developement Charges (SDCs), staff has conducted a
public information session to receive feedback on the proposed ordinance.
Approximately 10 persons attended the meeting. A document which outlines the
methodology that will be used to calculate SDCs has been included in the
agenda packet along with final modifications to the ordinance. Mr. Lyle said
that language regarding equivalent street and storm sewer assessments has
also been included to cover situations in which a developer wishes to build
off-site improvements. In that case, the full cost of the improvements would
be credited up to the full cost of the SDC.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 7
~ Mayor Miller opened the public hearing.
Jim Saul, 2780 Illinois Street, identified himself as a member of the SDC
Task Force and spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance. He commented on the
complicated nature of this issue and thanked the council for involving the
community in a task force review. He noted that the draft ordinance reflects
task force consensus and urged the council to approve the proposal. Mr. Saul
also commented on the high-quality staff work that was involved throughout
this issue.
Sue Prichard, 2671 Emerald Street, identified herself as a commercial real
estate broker and spoke in favor of the ordinance. She echoed Mr. Saul's
comments with respect to the quality of the staff work involved. She said
she is confident that the methodology used to calculate SDC charges is fair
and appropriate for the commercial brokerage community and described this as
a perfect example of how a community task force can work in everybody's fa-
vor.
e
Bob Tate, 3130 Willakenzie Drive, noted that he served on the task force as a
representative of the Home Builders Association and spoke in favor of the
ordinance. He said that the task force represented a broad range of perspec-
tives in the community and expressed appreciation for the opportunity to
become involved in the process at the beginning. He said that the Home
Builders Association fully supports the proposal that has been established.
Douglas Moorehead, 1460 Flintridge Drive, testified against the proposal. He
expressed his frustration with the process that was followed to create the
proposal and noted that the procedural methodology that will be used to cal-
culate SDCs is confusing. He noted that as a developer, the recommended
rate increases will result in SDC increases greater than 100 percent for his
project. Regarding the criterion that SDCs be equivalent with other communi-
ties in the state, Mr. Moorehead emphasized that Eugene is economically dif-
ferent from Portland and said that local developers cannot afford to compete
under the same SDC rates. He urged denial of the proposal.
Mayor Miller indicated that a letter in support of the ordinance was received
from the Chamber of Commerce.
There being no additional requests to speak, the public hearing was closed.
CB 4307--An ordinance regarding systems development charges;
amending Sections 7.010 and 7.065 of the Eugene Code,
1971; adding Sections 7.407 and 7.700 through 7.740
to that code; repealing Sections 7.275 through 7.285,
7.245 and subparagraph 7.174(2){b)5d of that code;
and declaring an emergency.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 8
e
this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
7:0.
Mr. Green echoed comments made by members of the SDC Task Force on the bene-
ficial process that was followed.
Mr. Boles thanked task force members for their willingness to participate and
said that staff on the task force set a high standard for public service.
Mr. MacDonald acknowledged that development costs in this community will
increase as a result of the revised methodology, but said that communities
have to discover new ways to support the costs of growth, particularly after
the passage of Ballot Measure 5.
Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0.
Council Bill 4307 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; with all
councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed
(and became Ordinance 19773).
The council took a five-minute break at 9:20 p.m. Councilor Ehrman left at
that time.
e
VII. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE CONCERNING APPEALS OF TRAFFIC-RELATED
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Brant Williams, Public Works
Transportation, gave a brief staff report. He said that the proposed ordi-
nance addresses three amendments to the City Code: 1) it establishes a hear-
ings official for the appeals process for administrative decisions of traf-
fic-relate matters; 2) defines additional traffic-related matters as adminis-
trative duties; and 3) provides additional criteria to be used in making
administrative decisions for traffic-related matters. Mr. Williams indicated
that the proposed process is consistent with other appeals processes for
administrative decisions, and said that the process would provide a more
timely and responsive process to address citizen concerns. Also, it will
improve decision-making consistency and be more objective.
Mr. MacDonald questioned why it is assumed that a hearings official decision
would be more factual and objective. Mr. Gleason responded that because
hearings officials are not elected to represent a particular constituency,
they can avoid the political nature of many decisions.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. Williams said that the costs
associated with a hearings official would be borne by the Road Fund.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 9
e
Mr. Boles asked what impact the repeal of Resolution 2414 regarding the traf-
fic diverter policy would have on citizens. In response, Mr. Williams said
that the process would not be different for citizens. The responsibility for
developing gUidelines and procedures regarding traffic diverters will now
rest with the City Manger. The final decision on this issue would be made by
the Hearings Official.
Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. There being no requests to speak,
the public hearing was closed.
Mr. MacDonald asked that the council hold a work session on this issue before
taking final action. The council agreed.
VIII. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND, A
STORM SEWER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND, A TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
DEVELOPMENT FUND, AND A PARKS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT FUND
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and indicated that David
Biedermann, Finance Division, was available to answer questions.
Res. No. 4242--A resolution establishing a Sanitary Sewer
Systems Development Fund.
Res. No. 4243--A resolution establishing a Storm Sewer
Systems Development Fund.
e Res. No. 4244--A resolution establishing a Transportation
Systems Development Fund.
Res. No. 4245--A resolution establishing a Parks Sewer
Systems Development Fund.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to adopt the resolu-
tion. Roll call vote. The motion carried unanimously, 6:0.
IX. APPROVAL OF INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to approve the ac-
tions taken by the Intergovernmental Relations Committee in
meetings of April 22 and May 8, 1991, as reflected in the
minutes.
Mr. Nicholson asked for clarification of HB3128 and HB3222, which appear in
the April 22 minutes. Mr. Gary clarified that the committee agreed with
staff to adopt a priority 1 opposition to HB3128 (administrative decisions
subject to referral), which would mandate that a number of decisions which
are currently administrative in nature be subject to the initiative and ref-
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 10
e
e
e
erendum process. He noted that following such a procedure would be burden-
some to the public process and to local government work load.
Mr. Gary clarified that HB3222 (prohibits some settlements) prohibits confi-
dentiality settlements and agreements under the Tort Claims Act, such as a
minor negligence claim. Mr. Gary said that he supports the recommendation
that the City not enter into confidential settlements.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles regarding SBI00l (special fund for
economic development loans and grants) discussed in the April 22 minutes,
Glen Potter, IGR, said that staff felt this bill would create burdensome
administrative procedures for the City. He added that Lane County officials
have indicated their willingness to support an amendment to the bill deleting
cities from its provisions.
Referring to the minutes of April 22, 1991, Mr. Boles asked that HB2773 and
HB3533 be brought back for further discussion. Mr. Nicholson also requested
that HB3287 and HB3222 be brought back for further discussion.
I
The council agreed by consensus that approval of the bills above would be
withdrawn from the motion.
Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0.
X. CONSIDERATION OF CITY POSITIONS ON STATE lEGISLATION
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Glen Potter, Intergovernmen-
tal Relations Division, gave the staff report. He pointed out that as re-
quested by the council, the agenda packet contains a staff memo providing
additional information on certain State Legislation. Staff recommendations
have been included in the memo.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to approve of priori-
ty 1 support for Senate Bills 738, 739, 1082, and 692, and
priority 2 support for House Bills 2743, 3439, 3418. Roll
call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0.
Mr. Boles suggested that IGR minutes be considered at Wednesday work ses-
sions.
XI. ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS FOR RIGHTS-Of-WAY
ACQUISITION FOR RIVER ROAD SANITARY SEWERS IN BASINS D, E, AND F
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. les Lyle, Public Works De-
partment, gave a brief staff report. He indicated that the City plans to
negotiate with all property owners where easements are needed and emphasized
that condemnation proceedings would only be used as a last resort.
Mr. Nicholson indicated that he is concerned with the City undertaking prop-
erty condemnation.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 11
e
Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Lyle said that the City
would have great difficulty constructing sanitary sewers in these basins
without these easements; if it were possible to reroute sewers, it would be
extremely costly to reroute sewers. .
Mr. Gary said that some tax benefits are given to property owners whose prop-
erty is acquired under threat of condemnation. The resolution enables prop-
erty owners to derive the benefit of condemnation without having to go
through the proceeding. In addition, Mr. Gleason said that once the City has
determined that it needs a right-of-way, it is compelled by statute to pro-
ceed with that action.
Mr. Boles asked that the benefits of condemnation to the property owners be
specifically outlined and that it be specified to which jurisdictions the
costs of those benefits are incurred.
CB 4309--An ordinance authorizing the institution of proceed-
ings in eminent domain for the acquisition by condem-
nation of property interests in River Road basins 0,
E, and F for the purposes of construction of sewer
improvements; and declaring an emergency.
e
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously,
6:0.
Council Bill 4309 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun-
cilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed (and
became Ordinance 19774).
XII. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, FINDINGS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL
AND ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION FORMING A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR
SANITARY SEWERS IN THE RIVER ROAD AREA FOR BASINS D, E, AND F
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and indicated that les lyle
was available to answer questions.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to approve the Hear-
ings Official's minutes, findings, and recommendations for
sanitary sewers in the River Road area for Basins 0, E, and F.
Responding to questions from Mr. Green, Mr. lyle said that the City has the
authority through the Boundary Commission to extend facilities into that area
extraterritorially. The remonstrance petition reflects eight percent of
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 12
e
property owners within Basins 0, E, and F who object to the installation of
sewers.
Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 6:0.
Res. No. 4246--A resolution initiating and ordering establish-
ment of a local improvement district for sani-
tary sewers in the River Road area for Basin D,
Basin E, and Basin F.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to adopt the resolu-
tion.
Mr. MacDonald said that he is sympathetic to the frustration and financial
burden experienced by property owners in the River Road area who are being
required to connect to sewers, but noted that there are health and safety
reasons supporting that decision.
Mr. Boles pointed out that the City has instituted several mechanisms for
property owners who suffer an economic hardship that allows the public to
bear some of the burden. He encouraged affected property owners to take
advantage of these mechanisms.
The meeting adjourned at 10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
e ~~~'.~J
Micheal Gleason
City Manager
(Recorded by Traci Northman)
mncc 051390-730
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
May 13, 1991
Page 13