HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/11/1992 Meeting (2)
e
e
e
M I NUT E S
Eugene City Council
Council Chamber--City Hall
May 11, 1992
7:30 p.m.
COUNCILORS PRESENT: Shawn Boles, Bobby Green, Ruth Bascom, Debra Ehrman,
Paul Nicholson, Kaye Robinette, Roger Rutan.
COUNCILOR ABSENT: Randy MacDonald.
The regular meeting of May 11, 1992, of the Eugene City Council was called to
order by His Honor Mayor Jeff Miller.
Photographs of the Mayor and City Council were taken to be included in a
brochure being developed by University of Oregon (U of 0) students.
Mayor Miller asked those testifying during the public hearings to limit their
comments to three minutes to ensure that everyone has the opportunity to
speak.
I. PUBLIC FORUM
Ann Aiken, Lane County Relief Nursery Board President, expressed appreciation
for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds the nursery received
from the City. She said the recent tragic death of a child in the community
underscores the urgency that the nursery needs to enhance its services to to
serve children on waiting lists.
John Sheppard, Capital Campaign Chairman for the Lane County Relief Nursery,
said he was hopeful that the nursery's campaign will reach its goal of $1.2
million. He expressed appreciation for the support received from the commu-
nity. He presented a plaque made by one of the children at the nursery.
Bill Mason, 1803 West 34th Avenue, said an advertisement recently appeared in
The Register-Guard stating that copies of the Urban Renewal Agency's and
City's draft budgets would be available after May 6 at the City Manager's
Office (CMO) and the Library. He said he visited the CMO on May 8 and again
earlier today but copies of the draft budgets were not available. He said he
finally obtained a copy of a draft summary, noting that the Urban Renewal
Agency's proposed budget was not included in it. He said staff indicated
that a copy of the complete drafts could be purchased for $30 or reviewed at
the Library. He suggested lending copies by a refundable deposit. He noted
that he expressed similar concerns to the Citizen Involvement Committee (CIC)
last year, which he said subsequently developed gUidelines for ensuring that
public information is appropriately made available.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 1
e
Aggie Coole, 4939 Morely Loop, said the council should have received a letter
from her expressing concern about a problem in her neighborhood with cats.
She suggested requiring cats to be licensed. She said she would like to be
able to set a harmless trap in her yard so that she can take them to the
animal control agency, which could then require owners to pay a fine to have
their cats returned.
Gail Millsap, 4939 Morely Loop, said an attorney has advised him that there
are no ordinances governing cats in Lane County. He asked the council to
consider adopting an ordinance similar to the one regulating dogs, or requir-
ing cat owners to be financially liable for damage done by their pets. He
noted that an elderly couple in his neighborhood no longer sit on their porch
like they use to because of the bad odor in their flowerbeds caused by cats.
Thom Alberti, Eugene Peaceworks, read two resolutions proposed by Eugene
Peaceworks for the council's signature calling for a reduction in the Federal
government's military budget and a reform in the nation's tax system and
urging the U.S. Attorney General's Office to bring Federal civil rights
charges against the acquitted Los Angeles police officers in the Rodney King
trial. He said Eugene Peaceworks would like to send the signed resolutions
to the White House, members of Congress, the Mayor of Los Angeles, the Gover-
nor of California, and Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates. He added that a
request for similar action has been distributed via a national computer net-
work.
e
II. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of City Council Minutes of January 22, 1992, Special
Meeting; February 5, 1992, Dinner Work Session; and February 12,
1992, Lunch Work Session
B. Approval of Findings and Recommendations of Hearings Official and
Adoption of Resolution Forming a Local Improvement District for
Paving, Curb, Gutter, and Storm Sewer on 14th Avenue from Lincoln
Street to Alley 150 Feet West (Job No. 2755)
Res. No. 4316--A resolution forming a local improvement dis-
trict for paving, curb, gutters, and storm
sewer on 14th Avenue from Lincoln Street to
Alley 150 feet West.
C. Approval of Findings and Recommendations of Hearings Official and
Adoption of Resolution Forming a Local Improvement District for
Paving and Storm Drain in Alley Between 7th Avenue and 8th Avenue
from Madison Street to Blair Boulevard (Job No. 2788)
Res. No. 4317--A resolution forming a local improvement dis-
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 2
e
e
e
trict for paving and storm drain in alley be-
tween 7th Avenue and 8th Avenue from Madison
Street to Blair Boulevard.
D.
Call for Public Hearing Concerning Street Vacation Request (James
Paulson: Elizabeth Street) (SV 92-3)
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the items
on the City Council consent calendar. Roll call vote; the
motion passed unanimously, 7:0.
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON 1990-91 UPDATE TO EUGENE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Diane Bishop, Public Works
Transportation Division, presented the staff report. The Eugene Bikeways
Master Plan was adopted by the council in 1975. Since that time, annual
reviews have occurred to implement revisions to policies and to provisions
for bikeway design and construction. The proposed changes this year are
mostly housekeeping measures.
Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Bishop said the Bicycle Commit-
tee discussed concerns about bike lanes on heavily traveled streets. She
said the aim is to make as many streets as bicycle-friendly as possible.
Ms. Bascom noted that the implementation of Route 455 along Hilyard Street
has been well received, especially by motorists.
Responding to a question from Mayor Miller, Ms. Bishop said routes 431, 433,
446, and 452 would require some removal of on-street parking. She said resi-
dents and businesses along these routes will be informed of the proposed bike
lanes and that options are available to address concerns about the removal of
on-street parking. She also noted that City policy is to move people and
goods with a lower priority for storage of vehicles.
Mr. Boles noted that the council is on record for supporting a move away from
the accommodations for automobiles that have been provided in the past to the
City's infrastructure.
Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. There being no requests to speak,
the public hearing was closed.
Res. No. 4318--A resolution amending the Eugene Bikeways Mas-
ter Plan and Addendum thereto.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to adopt the resolu-
tion. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 3
e
IV. PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE DISCHARGE AND CLEANUP
ORDINANCE
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and said the council is sched-
uled to act on this proposed ordinance at its June 8 work session. Dave
Nuss, Department of Public Safety (DPS), presented the staff report. The
release of hazardous substances into the environment may present imminent and
substantial threats to the public health, safety, welfare, and the environ-
ment. In some, but not all cases, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
{EPA} or the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality {DEQ} become involved
to ensure cleanup of contamination. Due to the limited resources of those
agencies, they do not always have the ability to immediately respond to the
release or identification of hazardous substances which threaten the public
health, safety, and welfare. The purpose of this ordinance is to minimize
those threats by ensuring the following: 1) the prompt identification of
discharges of hazardous substances into the environment, including old dis-
charges which continue to contaminate the environment, and 2} the implementa-
tion of removal or remedial actions. Therefore, the authority vested in the
City under this ordinance would be viewed as a last resort, should the DEQ or
EPA fail to take action for whatever reason.
Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Mr. Nuss said proactive efforts are
taken to prevent or eliminate any discharge of hazardous substances and that
the proposed ordinance would specifically be for reacting to such events
should they occur.
~ Responding to questions, Mr. Nuss said that incidents in which the City were
to actually respond would be situations in which the DEQ or EPA could have
responded, but did not. For example, in an incident involving the removal of
barrels containing solvents that were left by a business, the DEQ did not
immediately respond because the barrels were not leaking and did not present
an immediate danger. He said the DEQ is in support of the proposed ordinance
and that the ordinance would not alleviate DEQ's statutory responsibilities.
Mr. Boles requested information on whether the City, if it responded to an
incident in which the DEQ or EPA did not act for whatever reason, could re-
cover costs from either agency if it was unable to do so from the responsible
party.
Responding to a question from Mr. Green, Mr. Nuss said the ordinance would
have no effect on businesses that are already under notice of remediation
from the DEQ.
Mr. Robinette requested information about whether the City would incur some
liability under the ordinance if it did not respond to a situation in which
the DEQ or EPA also did not act. He asked if an ordinance could be drafted
that would allow the City to have the ability to initially respond as needed
in emergencies but not necessarily administer remedial action to avoid poten-
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 4
e
e
e
tial costly expenditures. Mr. Boles asked for a legal opinion on State and
Federal preemptions relative to the proposed ordinance and whether the ordi-
nance would be a use of home rule.
Mayor Miller opened the public hearing.
Scott Forrest, 5220 West Amazon Drive, introduced himself as the President of
Forrest Paint Company and noted that he has served on a citizen advisory
committee to the DEQ for the past two years. He expressed concern about the
proposed ordinance superseding regulations under the Federal Clean Air Act,
the Federal Clean Water Act, the Circular Superfund Act, and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. He expressed concern about the City being
able to require businesses to have an environmental assessment conducted,
noting the significant costs involved in such a study. Due to the length of
Mr. Forrest's testimony, he was asked to document his testimony and submit it
to staff for the council's consideration at its June 8 work session.
Les Duman, 1400 South Bertelsen Road, testified in opposition to the proposed
ordinance, saying that the DEQ and EPA already have sufficient regulations.
He explained that an environmental consulting group reviewed the proposed
ordinance and felt the language was vague. He described the costs involved
in removing hazardous substances and said he felt the City may not be able to
fully recover costs from responsible parties. He suggested that in light of
Ballot Measure 5, the DEQ could decide not to respond if the City has a mech-
anism in place to do so.
Dick Briggs described the costs and time involved in one case involving a
disagreement over the definition of one word. He suggested revisiting the
approach to avoid such costs.
There being no other requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. The
public record was held open until 5 p.m. on May 15.
Mr. Robinette asked for a legal opinion regarding the standards the City
would refer to that the ordinance did not specify. He asked for an analysis
on whether the City could enter into some type of agreement with the DEQ or
EPA instead of adopting an ordinance.
Referring to an earlier statement, Mr. Nicholson pointed out that the ordi-
nance provid~s a mechanism for a person who receives an order by the City to
have an environmental assessment conducted to be reimbursed for the costs of
the assessment.
Mr. Green asked for information on the cost of enforcing the ordinance.
Mayor Miller asked for clarification on what portion of the ordinance would
address life safety issues.
There being no other questions from councilors, further discussion was post-
poned until the June 8 work session.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 5
e
e
e
V. DAVID N. BURKS REGIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Bill DeForrest, Department
of Public Safety (DPS), presented the staff report. He said Susan
Brookfield, Lane County Sheriff's Training Manager, and Larry Martines, DPS
Central Training Manager, were present to answer questions. In 1988, the
City entered into an intergovernmental agreement with Lane County that re-
sulted in the joint construction of the existing pistol range at the David N.
Burks Regional Public Safety Training Facility, located at the Short Mountain
site. As part of that agreement, staff was directed to develop a master plan
for a public safety training facility at the site. The master plan was
jointly developed by the Department of Public Safety, lane County Sheriff's
Office, and Lane County Solid Waste Division. The master plan blends togeth-
er, in a harmonious manner, uses that traditionally are incompatible in a
tight urban environment. The plan calls for a 10- to 20-year phased develop-
ment, and funding is being explored from State, Federal, and private sources.
The plan is consistent with the City's Public Safety Long-Range Plan, and if
approved, would provide an effective framework for future regional coopera-
tion for developing public safety training facilities. The council is re-
quested to approve the master plan and initiate an amendment process to the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan to permit extension of
public water service to the site. The master plan has been reviewed and
given conceptual approval by the Public Safety Advisory Committee (PSAC) and
the Central Lane Law Enforcement Policy Board.
Responding to a question from Mr. Robinette, Jan Childs, Planning and Devel-
opment Department, explained that if the council chooses to initiate the
Metro Plan amendment process, the Lane County Board of Commissioners will be
asked to co-initiate the process. Proceedings would then begin for approval
by the governing bodies of Eugene, Springfield, and lane County.
Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Mr. DeForrest said Lane County
donated the land for the construction of the existing firearms range and paid
for the cost of constructing the existing hazardous materials storage facili-
ty. The Joint Training Board, composed of staff from DPS, the Lane County
Sheriff's Office, and the Lane County Solid Waste Division, is administering
the development of the site. The facility is envisioned to eventually be a
regional training facility with participation of other public safety agencies
in the state.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Mr. DeForrest said public water
service to the site would be provided by a new water line approximately 4,000
feet long, the cost of which is currently envisioned to be shared among the
City, Lane County, and Emerald Peoples Utility District (EPUD). Mr. Gleason
added that the water line would be used exclusively by the site.
Responding to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. DeForrest said staff be-
lieves that there would be cost efficiencies in terms of operations as well
as potential for cost recovery through participation of other public safety
agencies.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 6
e
e
e
Responding to a question from Mr. Green, Mr. DeForrest said that moneys
seized through narcotics arrests could be used for the development of the
site.
Mayor Miller commented that the master plan was consistent with the metropol-
itan consolidation and long-term, sustainable savings components of the Eu-
gene Decisions process.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles, Jim Croteau, Planning and Develop-
ment Department, said the Short Mountain site is considerably outside the
urban growth boundary. He added that water service would be provided by an
extra-territorial extension, similar to the one serving the sludge treatment
plant in north Eugene.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the David
N. Burks Regional Public Safety Training Facility Master Plan
and initiate an amendment to the Eugene-Springfield Metropoli-
tan Area General Plan to permit extension of public water
service to the site.
Mr. Nicholson said he would feel more comfortable voting on the motion after
further analysis of the operational costs. Mr. Gleason suggested postponing
action for further review of costs at a future meeting. Councilors Robinette
and Boles supported Mr. Gleason's suggestion. Mr. Green felt it was incum-
bent on the council to take action on the master plan tonight, saying that
the costs would be projections and subject to change.
Mr. DeForrest said the master plan will be presented to the lane County Board
of Commissioners on May 13.
Following further discussion, the motion was withdrawn without prejudice by
consent of the maker and the seconder, and action was postponed for a future
meeting.
Ms. Ehrman expressed appreciation for the naming of the facility after the
late lane County Sheriff David N. Burks.
VI. APPROVAL OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL AND
ORDINANCES LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR CONTRACTS 91-03, 91-05, 91-15,
91-18, AND 91-34
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic and said Les lyle, Public
Works Engineering Division, was present to answer questions.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the Hear-
ings Official's findings and recommendations of April 22, 1992
(Contracts 91-03, 91-05, 91-15, 91-18, and 91-34). Roll call
vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:0.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 7
.
CB 4382--An ordinance levying assessments for paving and sani-
tary and storm sewers in West 29th Avenue (Panorama
View 7th Addition) from 1,000 feet west of City View
Street to 1,440 feet west of City View Street; and
declaring an emergency (Contract 91-03).
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
7:0.
Council Bill 4382 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Rutan left the meeting.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill be ap-
proved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all council-
ors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and be-
came Ordinance No. 19847.
CB 4383--An ordinance levying assessments for sidewalks at
various locations on Clinton Drive from Butte Lane to
Willagillespie Road; and declaring an emergency (Con-
tract 91-05).
e
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
6:0.
Council Bill 4383 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr.
proved and given final passage.
ors present voting aye, the bill
came Ordinance No. 19848.
Green, that the bill be ap-
Roll call vote; all council-
was declared passed and be-
CB 4384--An ordinance levying assessments for storm sewer
south of Barger Avenue, east of Terry Street, along
north boundary of Woodland Hills Mobile Home Park,
Phase II; and declaring an emergency (Contract
91-15).
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
6:0.
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 8
e
Council Bill 4384 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr.
proved and given final passage.
ors present voting aye, the bill
came Ordinance No. 19849.
Green, that the bill be ap-
Roll call vote; all council-
was declared passed and be-
CB 4385--An ordinance levying assessments for paving, curb,
gutters, and storm sewer in 2nd Avenue from Washing-
ton Street to Lawrence Street; and declaring an emer-
gency (Contract 91-18).
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
6:0.
Council Bill 4385 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr.
proved and given final passage.
ors present voting aye, the bill
came Ordinance No. 19850.
Green, that the bill be ap-
Roll call vote; all council-
was declared passed and be-
e
CB 4386--An ordinance levying assessments for sanitary sewer
in Woodbine Subdivision between 24th Avenue and
Cleveland Street and Terrace View Drive and City View
Street; and declaring an emergency (Contract 91-34).
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Green, that the bill, with
unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by
council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
6:0.
Council Bill 4386 was read the second time by number only.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr.
proved and given final passage.
ors present voting aye, the bill
came Ordinance No. 19851.
Green, that the bill be ap-
Roll call vote; all council-
was declared passed and be-
VII. ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE EUGENE COMMERCIAL LANDS STUDY
City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Teresa Bishow, Planning and
Development Department, presented the staff report. On April 8, 1992, the
City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners conducted a joint public
hearing on the January 1992 Draft Eugene Commercial Lands Study. In general,
public testimony was in support of the overall direction in the draft study,
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 9
e
e
-
and action was postponed to allow further time to discuss potential amend-
ments to the draft study based on public testimony. Topics raised at the
joint public hearing included the following: 1) commercial redevelopment; 2)
maintaining a supply of vacant commercial land; 3) additional neighborhood
commercial land in south Eugene; and 4) radius clauses and private covenants.
She said Planning Commissioner Ellen Wojahn was present to answer questions.
Referring to Item 3, Ms. Ehrman asked how the existing commercial zoning
strip along Willamette Street could be retained within the current bounda-
ries. In response, Ms. Bishow said the council could state for the record
that it is not interested in allowing additional commercial land that would
extend the linear commercial strip along Willamette Street. Ms. Wojahn said
the Planning Commission's sentiment was to not extend strip commercial zon-
ing, especially to the point that would create access problems along the
street.
Responding to a question from Mr. Robinette, Ms. Wojahn said the Planning
Commission discussed the four items outlined in the staff report. The com-
mission looked particularly at the West 11th Avenue area for designating new
commercial land and supported designating new major retail commercial sites
only through the Metro Plan amendment process. The commission shares con-
cerns that have been raised regarding the timing of development of existing
vacant, large sites. Regarding Item 2, the following wording for Implementa-
tion Strategy 10.2 received support by the commission: "Examine ways to
allow flexibility in the sighting of new commercial land that accommodates
changes in population, transportation networks, utility extensions, etc.,
through amending the existing zoning ordinance or other tools." Regarding
Item 3, the commission felt that using the downtown core as a commercial
option for south Eugene was not reasonable for various reasons. The commis-
sion supported a combination of option A and B, perhaps with some reference
to a "housing trigger." Regarding Item 4, the commission was comfortable
with the City Attorney's Office suggestions and would support further exami-
nation of the issues.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles regarding the league of Women Voters'
request for Item 1, Ms. Bishow said that the Planning Commission would sup-
port the amendment to read "prohibit" as a matter of principle. The word
"avoid" was initially favored as it better reflects the flexibility or future
discretion the elected officials have in approving a change to the Metro Plan
to allow a new major retail site.
Responding to a question from Mr. Boles about Item 3, Option C, Ms. Wojahn
clarified that the Planning Commission supported allowing the establishment
of additional neighborhood commercial land in connection with the creation of
a new area for medium-density residential development. Ms. Bishow said she
believed the commission supported this concept in light of concerns about
transportation and housing goals in south Eugene. She said she believed the
commission supported Option A with the portion of Option B that states that
additional commercial land would be based on a demonstrated demand for com-
mercial services.
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 10
e
e
e
Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Ms. Wojahn recalled that the Plan-
ning Commission would be comfortable with the council's decision to remove
examples of potential sites of additional neighborhood commercial land from
the map. Ms. Bascom commented that allowing up to 15 acres of additional
neighborhood commercial land in south Eugene could have an negative impact on
existing neighborhood commercial sites that are currently thriving. Ms.
Wojahn said she believed that the Planning Commission would be comfortable in
reducing this number. Ms. Bishow concurred. Ms. Bascom supported reducing
the allowable amount to 10 acres and requiring that the establishment of
additional neighborhood commercial land sites be based on demonstrated demand
for commercial services and be connected with the creation of new medium-den-
sity residential development.
CB 4364--An ordinance adopting the Eugene Commercial Lands
Study.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Nicholson, that the bill be
amended as follows: I} strike section 3 in the adopting ordi-
nance; 2} Implementation Strategy 6.1, on page III-7, be
amended to read "prohibit" instead of "avoid;" 3} Implementa-
tion Strategy 10.2, on page 111-8, be amended to read "examine
ways to amend the existing zoning ordinance to allow flexibil-
ity in the siting of new commercial land that accommodates
changes in population, transportation networks, utility exten-
sions, etc."; 4} deleting draft Policy 21 and related imple-
mentation strategies; and 5} adopting a new Policy 21 stating
"Consider downtown as the commercial service area for south
Eugene. Allow establishment of additional commercial land if
done in connection with the creation of a new area for medi-
um-density residential development."
Ms. Ehrman requested that the following clause be added to the end of the new
Policy 21 in the above motion: "Further strip commercial activity on
Willamette Street will be discouraged." By consent of the maker and seconder
of the motion, the clause was added to the above motion.
Ms. Bishow advised that striking section 3 of the ordinance would be a sig-
nificant amendment.
Roll call vote; the motion failed 4:2, with councilors Bascom,
Green, Robinette, and Ehrman voting nay and councilors Boles
and Nicholson voting aye.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Nicholson, to approve an
ordinance adopting the Eugene Commercial Lands Study.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Nicholson, to strike section
3 of the ordinance.
Mr. Boles said it was time for the City to become serious about land use
planning and felt this needed to be accomplished by equating strategies to
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 11
e
the same level as policies instead of leaving them to the interpretation of
both the community in which they apply and staff who are forced to apply
them. In response, Ms. Bishow said citizens involved in the Commercial lands
Study have understood that policies would be adopted and that strategies
would be further refined prior to implementation. She believed that if this
amendment is approved, the lane County Board of Commissioners would not be
able to act on the study without holding another public hearing on the pro-
posed changes.
Jim Croteau, Planning and Development Department, said that implementation
strategies under each policy were very important to provide flexibility in
how they are implemented. He strongly recommended retaining both the poli-
cies and strategies.
Mr. Robinette said he did not think the council should address changes in
policy matters through the adoption of a land use plan. Mr. Boles said he
felt that strategies, when finalized for implementation, are often crafted in
a way that is not to the benefit of the larger body politic. Jan Childs,
Planning and Development Department, said the Planning Commission shares Mr.
Boles' concern. Mr. Robinette said he shared Mr. Boles' concern and suggest-
ed forwarding his concern to the Planning Commission for review and recommen-
dation.
Roll call vote; the amendment failed 4:2, with councilors
Ehrman, Bascom, Green, and Robinette voting nay and councilors
Boles and Nicholson voting aye.
e
Ms. Ehrman moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to amend Section 3
of the ordinance to read as follows: "The implementation
strategies set forth in the study are recognized as potential
ideas on how to address the policies." Roll call vote; the
amendment passed unanimously, 6:0.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to amend Implementa-
tion Strategy 6.1, on page 111-7, to read "prohibit" instead
of "avoid." Roll call vote; the motion passed 4:2, with coun-
cilors Boles, Ehrman, Bascom, and Nicholson voting aye and
councilors Green and Robinette voting nay.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to amend Implementa-
tion Strategy 10.2, on page III-B, to read as follows: "Exam-
ine ways to amend the existing zoning ordinance to allow flex-
ibility in the siting of new commercial land that accommodates
changes in population, transportation networks, utility exten-
sions, etc." Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously,
6:0.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to delete draft Poli-
cy 21 and related implementation strategies and adopt a new
Policy 21 stating: "Consider downtown as the commercial ser-
vice area for south Eugene. Allow establishment of additional
e
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 12
e
e
e
commercial land if done in connection with the creation of a
new area for medium-density residential development. Further
strip commercial activity on Wi11amette Street will be dis-
couraged."
Mr. Green said he was going to vote against this amendment because he sup-
ported strip commercial activity.
Roll call vote; the motion passed 4:2, with councilors Bascom,
Boles, Ehrman, and Nicholson voting aye and councilors Green
and Robinette voting nay.
Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, Council
Bill 4364 was declared passed as amended, and became Ordinance
No. 19853.
Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Nicholson, to instruct the
City Manager to prepare an ordinance prohibiting future use of
new radius clauses. Roll call vote; the motion failed 4:3,
with Mayor Miller (breaking the tie) and councilors Bascom,
Green, Ehrman voting nay and councilors Boles, Nicholson, and
Robinette voting aye.
Ms. Bascom moved to ask the City Attorney's Office to investi-
gate private covenants as they relate to the City's affordable
housing program. The motion died due to a lack of a second.
Mr. Nicholson moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to consider the
above two motions as a package.
Ms. Ehrman suggested postponing discussion regarding private covenants for a
future meeting. By consent of the maker and seconder, the motion was with-
drawn, and discussion was postponed for a future meeting.
The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
__ d/, _~~"~
/':-;/~~j:://y /4;
Mi ch/a 1 G1 eason..--.- "
City Manager
(Recorded by David Straub)
mncc 051192-730
MINUTES--Eugene City Council
7:30 p.m.
May 11, 1992
Page 13