The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12/20/1976 Meeting , e M I N IJ T E S EUGENE CITY COUNCIL December 20, 1976 --, Ad;ourned meetinQ--from December 13, 1976--of the Common Council of the city of ~uqene, Oregon, was called to order by Council President Gus Keller, in the absence of Mayor Anderson, at 7:30 p.m. on December 20, 1976 in the Council Chamber with the following Council members present: Eric Haws, Neil Murray, Ray Bradley, D. W. Hamel, and Edna Shirey. Council members Tom Williams and Wickes Beal were absent. I. Public HearinQs A. Request for permit to use mobile home for temporary offices at 4060 Stewart Road--CADCO Enterprises. ManaQer noted there were no objections to the proposed use of a mobile home for temporary office space provided the permanent office construc- tion commence within six months and be completed within 18 months. Public HearinQ was held with no testimony presented. Resolution 2602--Granting permit for mobile home for offices at e 4060 Stewart Road, CADCO Enterprises, no longer than eiqhteen (18) months. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. B. Appeal, denial of taxi license--Richard Glade Shimanek Manaqer reviewed the application process and noted that upon the recom- mendation of the police department the finance department had denied the applicant's request for a taxi cab operator's license. Pu rsuant to the Euqene Code, the applicant had appealed the denial to the City Council. The Ci ty Manager read Eugene Code Secti on 3.050 setti ng forth the basis upon which such licenses are granted. He reviewed the records of the police department involving the applicant as contained in a memorandum distributed to the City Council and reaffirmed the staff's recommendation to deny the application. Public hearinq was opened. Richard Glade Shimanek, Rt. 4 Box 251, Dillard Road, Eugene, felt the basis for the application denial was his mental illness. He stated he was on leave from the State mental hospital. He did not intend to drive taxi cab full time but to do maintenance and dispatch work and to oenerally supervise the drivers of the cab company which e he and his wife own. He felt the denial of his application had the effect of treating him as a criminal. He stated doctors at the State mental hospital were receiving more complaints about the police departments in this area than in any other area of the state. loOfo Minutes 12/20/76 - 1 , . He asked why other cab companies were allowed to hire convicted murderers who were on parole. He also noted that the state had awarded him his chauffeur's license and that he had never had any difficulty involving his drivinq privileges. Mr. Haws asked if the applicant had had an opportunity to review the memorandum from the Director of Finance to the City Council dated December 20 and suggested that, if he had not, the proceedings should be suspended to allow the applicant to review and respond to the contents of the memorandum. Mr. Murray asked if a brief suspension was sufficient time. Mr. Haws indicated that if the applicant wanted additional time he would be happy to move to reset the hearing on the matter for a later date. Mr. Shimanek stated, "Go ahead and decide tonight." Mrs. Shirey inquired if the applicant could engage in the activities he described without picking up nassengers and whether or not that would require a license. The manager responded no license would be necessary unless he was picking up passengers. President Keller asked if the kinds of functions Mr. Shimanek indicated he was going to engage in were outside the regular licensing procedure and would require special monitoring and licensing. Acting Chief of Police Larion stated that the applicant At could operate in a car in the field and supervise his drivers, dispatch and otherwise operate the business without a license. He only needed a license if he were going to pick up passengers. Public hearing was closed. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to deny the appeal and upho1 d the staff's decision to deny the license. Mr. Haws stated his motion is based on the information contained in the Finance Director's memorandum of December 20, and that he would be happy to consider new information should the applicant have new information to present to the Council at some subsequent time in connection with a new application for a taxi operator's license. Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. It Minutes 12/20/76 - 2 <001 II. Items acted upon with one motion after discussion of individual items as e requested. Previously discussed in committee on December 15 (Present: President Keller; Council members Haws, Beal, Williams, Murray, Bradley, Hamel, and Shirey). Minutes of those meetinqs appear below printed in sma 11 er type. l. Items from Mayor and Council Com 12/15/76 A. Community Development Application Process--Mr. Hurray reported File on the Community Development Application Process currently underway. The process is part of a three-year plan approved by the federal government; this year major consideration is being given to the heavily low-income population. Hr. Murray said that requests for proposals have been circulated; responses have been received from neighborhood groups, private groups, the Human Rights Commissions, and the Downtown Development Board. Additionally, a public hearing has been held and the Housing and Community Development Commission has met to gen- erate their own ideas as well. Staff has looked at the pro- posals and made recommendations to the Commission, pointing out those applications not allowable under the Community De- velopment Act, those on which there is some local policy vio- lation or not enough relationship to the low-income population, as well as those which may have impact on some area now in a critical planning process. He said the Commission has determined . that, for at least another year, it will not fund any further development of neighborhood centers unless a commitment has already been made. The commission wants to have experience in the field and an opportunity to work out on-going responsibilities before deciding whether it wishes to pursue those areas again. The application draft will be reviewed in January with a public hearing to be held in early February. Subsequently, the Budget Committe will review and the application will then go to the City Council. Com 12/15/76 B. Ordinance Adoption Rezoning the Area South of 29th and Wi11amette-- Affi rm As there had been some questions raised on the parliamentary procedure followed at the December 13 Council meeting, Joyce Benjamin of the city attorney's office distributed a report to Council which outlined the proper procedure to be followed. She explained that the action before the Council at its December 13 meeting was an application for a change in zoning submitted following Planning Commission approval after a joint hearing with the Council. It was not a new application. It if had been a new application, it could not even have been considered. Mrs. Benjamin noted that the bill had an extra reading at the December 13 meeting. At that meeting, she said, there was some question whether the bill was being read for the first time. The first motion to deny and adopt negative findings failed. At that e foOB Minutes 12/2(j76 - 3 '" point Council moved to approve and adopt supportive findings. -e( If that motion was construed as the first reading, the f:,lc t that it lacked unanimous consent meant it must be held for second reading December 20. Although the bill had an extra reading, which may be superfluous, the action taken is still valid, said Mrs. Benjamin. The bill is now set for a final reading December 20, at which time the Council can accept or reject the bill. Mrs. Benjamin also mentioned the debate that arose at the December 13 meeting on whether the public hearing should be reopened. She said that, although the presiding officer could have reopened the hearing, to have done so would have raised issues of fairness, as there had been no notification to the parties that another public hearing would be held. There was no necessity for a hearing, as the matter had already been heard at previous hearings. Com 12/15/76 C. Budget Committee Appointment--Mr. Haws indicated that he would File be recommending a Budget Committee appointment from Ward 6, to replace Ray Bradshaw who is resigning. Com 12/15/76 D. National League of Cities Meeting Report--Mr. Haws noted that File the NLC meeting was a very rewarding experience. He said that there were several different programs presented; for the most part he attended programs having to do with small cities. He also mentioned that he had opportunity to talk with Spring- field council members at the meeting. He wondered if it would --C I be possible for the two councils to exchange minutes in the fu ture. Mr. Bradley mentioned some of the substantive issues that were addressed at the meeting. On the issue of public safety, the delegates reaffirmed their earlier position regarding handgun legislation. On transportation, they fe1 t the federal govern- ment should have single funding sources for highway and road improvements. The delegates also felt there should be area- wide planning for common urban problems. Also discussed was the possible decriminalization of the use of heroin. In that regard Manager was under the impression from local press reports that the drug under discussion was cocaine. Mr. Bradley said that, as regards environmental quality, discussion was held on establishing noise pollution controls, solid waste facilities, urban deterioration controls, etc. He finally mentioned that the city of Jacksonville, Oregon, received a citation for their presentation on historic preservation. - Minutes 12/20/76 - 4 "Oq ...- ,;-' ~om 12/15/76 E. Metropolitan Plan Policy Committee Report--Report was dis- ile tributed to Council members December 8. Mr. Bradley reported e that the committee has established general areas of study invol- ving local plans, population projections, employment, etc. . and how they affect the metropolitan area. After these studies are conducted, a target area will be isolated. Secondly, said Mr. Bradley, the year 2000 was established as the target date to coincide with planning activities, 1.e. , transportation, etc. Thirdly, said Mr. Bradley, the committee is in the process of identifying what particular areas in the current plan should be evaluated. They have identified general areas as follows: opportunity areas, industrial land areas within the metro area, whether there should be a plan Giagram, and the concept of urban boundaries. Staff has been providing the committee with data which will be sorted out and re-examined; after that, Phase II--the actual update--wi11 begin. Mr. Williams mentioned the recent problems regarding the pos- sible construction of a Bi-Mart store at 40th and Donald. In that regard, he noted the differences between language in the 1990 Plan and the zoning ordinance. He would hope that the language in the two could be more consistent. Mr. Williams also mentioned the general tendency to separate commercial and industrial areas--perhaps a merging would be more appropriate. He cited a classic example of the U of 0, which is considered a C basic industry. If zoned industrial, then housing in that area would be a nonconforming use. Planning Director also mentioned e that staff is looking at the use of the Plan Diagram as an effective tool. He said staff would appreciate input, directed to either him or Mr. Bradley. Com 12/15/76 F. Police Chief Appointment--Manager announced the appointment of File Mr. Pierce Brooks as the new Chief of Police for the City of Eugene. Mr. Brooks was a former police chief in the city of Springfield, served as Director of Public Safety in Lakewood, Colorado, and has held command positions in detective, patrol, . and intelligence divisions in Los Angeles. Mr. Brooks will assume his duties in Eugene in early January. Com 12/15/76 G. Budget Committee Appointment--Council member-elect Jack Delay Approve has recommended the appointment of Mary Jane O'Brien, 1892 Olive, to the Budget Committee from Ward 3. Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to approve the ap- pointment as recommended. Motion carried unanimously. Cor.: 12/1S/7() H. Distribution of Legal Opinions--Manager noted the distri- l. File bution to Council of legal opinions on Budget Committee appointments and on Zoning Board procedures. I. Meeting Dates--Manager reminded Council of the following dates: .m 12/15/76 City Hal1--County Pedestrian Bridge Dedication at 9:30 a.m. lIe December 20; joint meeting with the City of Springfield at the Rodeway Inn, 7:30 a.m., December 17; new and old Council members dinner at Brian's "tonight", following a 4:30 City Hall tour. tolO MinI1TP<: 17/?nhA _ c; .., Com 12/1S/7~. Legislative Coordinator Resignation--Manager announced the re- File signation of Donna Thatcher as Council coordinator. Mr. Hamel moved seconded by Mr. Haws to pass a reso- e lution commending Mrs. Thatcher for her many years of fine service. Motion carried unanimously. Com 12/1517~. Labor Relations Workshop--Manager announced that. on December File 16, at a labor relations conference for City and County officials at the Valley River Inn~ there would be an intere~ting debate regarding home rule and labor relations policy. Com 12/15/7<J.. Labor Relations Ordinance Amendment--Manager announced a labor Affirm relations ordinance amendment regarding the hearings official would be on the December 20 Council agenda, providing there is full agreement between all parties involved. ( Com Edge PUD (11-9-76) Pub Mr. hearing for Com 12/15)tJ' Appe~l of Taxi License Denial f~r Richa:d Glade Shimanek--Council has A rece~ved December 1 memo from F~nance D~rector. pprove Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Williams to call a public hearing for December 20. 1976. :- Mr. Haws requested that Council receive documentation on the matter prior to the December 20 Council meeting. Assistant manager re- sponded that staff will provide whatever it can, noting that security and privacy legislation precludes non-criminal justice agency people from reviewing certain facts. Mr. Bradley wondered if some other . body could be delegated to act as a hearings officer on appeals of this sort. Assistant Manage~ responded that it has been tradition to have such appeals come to the City Council. Law does not require that it be done that way, however. He suggested that staff could look into other options on future appeals. He noted ,that the appellant could always reapply if the process is changed. Mr. Haws requested that staff provide Council with criteria to be used in ( deciding on granting licenses of this type. I ( Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Com 12/15/76 IV. Southwest Hills Neighborhood Organization Charter--Proposed An~Tove charter has been distributed to Council members, along with December 1 letter from the secretary of the Southwest Hills Neighborhood Organization. Dewey Newman. 2040 Hawkins Lane, president of the association. mentioned the controversy that has arisen over the name of the , organization. The South Hills Neighborhood Organization has -e protested the use of the name Southwest Hills by the group due to possible confusion that could result. Mr. Newman said that the organization developed a name that would reflect their geo- graphical location. They request final approval of the charter at this time, and they would be willing to subsequently select \ a new name. Co\\ .., ... ,..... J............ J..... I'" '" - -- Mr. James Lemert, 10 East 40th, president of the South Hills :. Neighborhood Association, strongly encourages the selection of another name by the group to avoid possible future con- fusion. Mr. Murray referred to Article V, Section 4, of the charter, which says that decisions shall be made by a majority vote of those present and voting, except for purposes of amending the ( charter. In that regard, he did not feel it was clear what au- thority the executive committee has to speak for the group. Mr. Newman said that official positions could only be taken by the general membership. Mr. Haws felt that the group should come back within thirty to sixty days with a new name. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve the charter as submitted. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye except Mr. Bradley voting no. It was understood that the organization would come back with a new name and no time limit was set. Com 12/15/76 V. Cable TV Study in Connection with Franchise Study--December 8 memo from the Metropolitan Cable Television/Translator Commis- Approve sionhas been distributed to Council members. The commission is e recommending that the Cable Television Information Center at the Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., be employed to conduct technical and financ ial studies of the local cable system and advise the commission on franchise negotiations. Mr. Williams noted that it was his recommendation six months ago that the commission needed high-quality technical assistance. The decision at that time was to let the city attorney's office loo~ at << the matter. It is the attorney's opinion that the kind of expertise being recommended is necessary. Mr. Williams further added that the Cable Television Information Center is the only institution that provides this type of service. Mr. Haws wondered if any of the cost of the consultant would be recuperated. Mr. Williams responded that three percent of the franchise revenue is now received by the city. Any increase over three percent requires approval of the Federal Communications Commission or a showing by the franchisor that additional services are being provided to the franchisee. There is some possibility of joint funding for this study. He also mentioned that there is a request to increase the fee to five percent, which would provide a local television origination process. There has been no decision on that possibility as yet. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to authorize the commission to enter into a contract with the Cable Television Information Center for technical and professional services in an amount not to exceed $17,500, cost to be shared among e Springfield, Lane County, and Eugene, with Eugene's share being 56 percent. Motion carried unanimously. ~ I ;l.. i-1inlltes 12/20/76 - 7 VI. Option Agreement with Lane County for Acquiring County Maintenance . Com 12/15/76 Yard--Staff report of December 13 ~as been distributed to Council Approve ~ers. Manager noted that it would be in the city's interest, from economic and service points of view, to centralize the maintenance ( facilities. Vehicles from public works, police, fire, and parks would be involved in the centralization. The matter has been under discussion with the county for quite some time. The county has agreed to make the city the first offer on the property. Manager said that discussions today should relate to whether to proceed and deciding on terms of acquisition of an option. He noted that the costs and terms of the acquisition should be discussed in a Council Executive Session. Mr. Hamel moved seconded by Mr. Bea1 that the Council go into Executive Session, as authorized for under ORS 192.660(2). Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to approve, affirm, and file as noted Items listed under II-A. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council ~- members present voting aye. / e' ~\3 Minutes 12/20/76 -- 8 . III. Ordinances Council Bill No. 1234--Rezoninq to C-2 SR the area south of south- east corner of 29th Avenue-and Wi 11 amette Street (A & W) (Z 76-20), read the first time September 13 and held, lacking unanimous consent for a second reading at that time, read the second time September 20 and denied, referred to a joint meet- ing of the Council and Planning Commission, Commission reaffirm- ing recommendation to approve, read again on December 13 and delayed because of procedural Question, was read by Council bill number and title only, there beinq no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Haws raised a procedural auestion. He noted his opposition to the rezoning based upon the facts and wanted to make a single motion that would resolve the issue. He asked whether, if he were to move to deny and the motion passed, the matter would be concluded. Joyce Benjamin, assistant city attorney, affirmed that would be the result for one year, at which time the applicant could reapply for a zone change. In response to a Question from Mr. Bradley, Mr. Haws noted that last time the Council was deadlocked in a tie vote the motion was ruled to have failed. Mr. Haws restated his Question that if he moved to approve the Council bill and it failed, would the matter be concluded. Again the attorney affirmed the earlier rulinq. I -~ Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Murray that findings supporting the zone change as set out in the Planning Commission Staff Notes of July 26, 1976, be adopted by reference thereto; and that the bill be approved and given fi na 1 pa ssage. Mr. Haws noted he was goinQ to vote against the motion. Mr. Bradley also expressed his intention to vote against the motion because he felt approval of the zone change would deviate from the Council's policy to refuse to extend commercial development further on south Willamette. He considered this request to extend the zoning a major deviation from the policy and felt that a thorough study of the impact of such a policy change should be made before any rezoning occurred. He noted he was uncertain how he would vote on the matter following such a study. Mr. Hamel noted the request was not adding any new businesses to the area but rather was merely removing a house which the applicant owned to allow the business to expand. Mr. Ha ws fe 1 t there was some Quandary about the deqree of "public need" demonstrated in this matter. He felt there were times when a private need existed but not a public need and that he did not see a public need in this instance. e IoILf ~.....; r\ 1 t + r.. ~ 1 J I r") n J"7 L ('\ " Mr. Murray expressed his feeling that a public need had been demon- strated because the improvements would enhance ingress and egress . from the property in an area that has historical traffic problems. This improvement constituted the sufficient public need in his judgment. Mr. Bradl ey noted the probl em of youngsters "draggi ng the gut" on weekends and hoped that the committee studying that issue would come up with recommendations that would have relevance to the proposed zone change. He said that, if the matter were pelayed until that committee's report, the Council could have additional guidance in this matter. He felt a decision on the merits of the matter "tonight" would be without all the information the Council could have. Mr. Haws noted his disagreement with Mr. Bradley and said the applicant had an opportunity to return in a year if there was a case to be made for the public need. Mr. Hamel noted the A & W stand had been at that intersection for many years prior to the weekend traffic problem and that only a very small percentage of the weekend drivers patronized the business establishment. President Keller noted the recent improvements to the intersection of 29th Avenue and Willamette had greatly alleviated the problem. He di d not understand how a denial of this application would improve the weekend problems on Willamette. He concurred with Mr. Murray that public need could be defined to include this zone change and that he was going to support the motion. Mrs. Shirey noted that when the matter was initially presented to the Council she felt inclined to support the matter recog- nizing the financial need of the applicant to remain competitive with other businesses in the area. She has since concluded, however, that ~- the impact of the commercial expansion upon the adjoining residential properties is too serious and that the zone change should therefore be denied. Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion failed, Council members Keller, Murray, and Hamel voting aye, and Council members Haws, Bradley, and Shirey voting nay. Council Bill No. 1302--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within Western Industrial Park, and sanitary sewer and storm sewer within 160 feet of south boundary of Western Industrial Park (76-24) (1150) was read by council bill number and title only, there being,no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Murray that the bill be referred to Assess- ment Panel for hearing on January 17, 1977, and brought back for Council consideration of Panel recommendations on January 24, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. Council Bill No. 1303--Levying assessments for sanitary sewer between 18th Avenue and 18th Place from Tyier Street to approximately 155 feet east (76-25) (1229) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Murray that the bill be referred to Assess- ,-e ment Panel for hearing on January 17, 1977, and brought back for Council consideration of Panel recommendations on January 24, 1977. Mo ti on carried unanimously. ~15 Minutes 12/20/76 -- 10 . . Council Bill No. 1304--Levyinq assessments for paving, sanitary . sewer and storm sewer within 2nd Addition to Firland Heights, and sanitary sewer and storm sewer within 160 feet of east boundary of 2nd Addition to Firland Heights (76-43) (1274) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesti nq that it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Murray that the bill be referred to Assess- ment Panel for hearin9 on January 17, 1977, and brought back for Council consideration of Panel recommendations on January 24, 1977. Motion carried unanimously. Council Bill No. 1305--Levying assessments for sanitary sewer on Pattison Street from Berntzen Street to west within Gregory Park (76-47) (1285) was read by Council bill number and title only, there being no r~uncil member present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Murray that the bill be referred to Assess- ment Panel for hearing on January 17, 1977, and brought back for Council consideration of Panel recommendations on January 24, 1977 . Motion carried unanimously. Council Bill No. 1306--Amending City Code Section 2.896 re: Labor-Management Resolutions Impasse Resolution Costs was read by Council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting that it be read in full. e Manaqer noted these amendments to City Code 2.896 were necessary to implement the intent of the existing collective bargaining provisions of the municipal code. Union representatives had been consulted and concurred in the amendments which modify the code to allow the parties to negotiate the cost of arbitration. He noted it was the intent of the amendment to remain within the perameters of the original code provisions. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Murray that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Murray that the bill be approved and Qiven final passage. ~oll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 17817. IV. Resolutions Resolution ~ID. 2603--Approving charter and recognizing Southwest Hills Neighborhood Organization was read by number and title. Mr. 8radley requested to review the copy of Resolution 2603 and asked if - the Council would support including within the motion a requirement that within 60, 90, or 120 days the neighborhood organization return with a name change to avoid confusion with the existing South Hills Neighborhood Organization. Mr. Murray indicated he was operating on the assumption that the Southwest Hills Neighborhood Organization leadership understood from Io/b Minutes 12/20/76 -- 11 , the committee-of-the-who1e meeting that there was a need to select a ne\'{ . name for the organization and that they would accomplish that task as soon as possible. He saw no reason to impose a deadline or other strict rules. Mr. Bradley expressed his desire to only reflect within the body of the Resolution the intent of the committee-of-the-who1e meeting requiring a name change. Mr. Bradley moved seconded by Mr. Murray that Resolution 2603 be amended to instruct the Southwest Hills Neighborhood Association to work out a name change with the existing South Hills Neighborhood Association, the name change to occur within a reasonable period of time. Mrs. Shirey felt this amendment was an unnecessary step in light of the responsive leadership in the Southwest Hills Neighborhood Organization. Mr. Keller concurred in Mrs. Shirey's feelings. Vote was taken on the motion as stated which failed, council members Hamel, Murray and Bradley voting aye, and council members Keller, Shirey, and Haws voting nay. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. Resolution No. 2604--Authorizing execution of option in the amount of $10,000 for purchase of County maintenance yard at 1820 Roosevelt Boulevard was read by number and title. -_ Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. Resolution No. 2605--Authorizing payment of bills and claims for period December 13 through December 20 was read by number and title. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Rollcall va te . Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. Resolution No. 2606--Authorizing a transfer of funds for maintenance of Ci ty Hall II, the Morse Ranch, and Peterson Barn Facilities was read by number and title. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. Re so 1 uti on No. 2607--In appreci ati on for the service of [))nna Thatcher in all the years she has worked for the Ci ty of Eugene was read by number and title. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. -..,_ Minutes 12/20/76 -- 12 lot1 r ~ \~ , - . ,:'e!. Resolution No. 2608--A resolution authorizing execution of Muni- cipal Judge Employment Contract was read by number and title. Mr. Haws moved seconded by Mr. Hamel to adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the meeting was adjourned. j pCM12b2 ~ oi..).. ~/ Charles T. He~ ~ Ci ty Manager lk -' - - --:;.' 6>18 Minutes 12/20/76 -- 13