Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/12/1977 Meeting M I NUT E S EUGENE CITY COUNCIL - October 12, 1977 Adjourned meeting from October 10, 1977, of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 11:30 a.m. on October 12, 1977, at the King's Table, Oakway Mall, with the following Council members present: Eric Haws, O. W. Hamel, Ray Bradley, Jack Delay, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, and Betty Smith. Councilor Tom Williams was absent. I. Items from Mayor and Council A. ESATS Report--Councilor Delay expressed concern in receiving briefing on ESATS after reading the report in the newspaper. He felt there should be more timely and regular status reports. B. Joint Parks Committee--Mayor Keller appointed Brian Obie to replace Scott Lieuallen. , C. Tree Preservation Committee--Mayor Keller appointed the following people: Tom Slocum, 2125 Fairmount Boulevard, real estate developer; John Breeden, 4072 Normandy Way, builder; Dick Unruh, 3225 Fillmore, architect; Peter Thompson, 2440 Oak Grove Drive, landscape architect; Ted Paulsen, 2159 Val Ha11iJ.lforester; Kay Holbo, 2090 Broadview, e citizen--neighborhood group; and Ray Wiley, 2100 Shields, citizen-- neighborhood group. The committee will select its own chairperson. D. Joint Planning Commission-Council meeting--Manager reported, as a result of action taken by Council October 10 regarding the mixed- use zoning, the amended version was to be referred back to the Planning Commission. A suggested meeting date for a joint meeting was Tuesday evening, November 1, the regular Planning Commission meeting. Manager said Council could make arrangements to have a dinner meeting prior to that meeting for the selection of the Civic Center architect and thus eliminate the Wednesday noon, November 2 meeting. Mr. Haws wondered how long the Planning Commission meeting would last. Jim Saul, Planner, said it would be very difficult to tell, as there may be many people who wish to speak. He said time limits could be established, but there would be perhaps 30 to 40 people who had previously testified and others may appear. He also noted it depended on the nature of Council's direction, as it indicated at its October 10 meeting that other properties might be discussed. Mr. Haws wondered if it might be proper for Council and Planning Commission to start over and consider R-4 zoning again. He al so was not convinced that the meeting should focus on just the two properties noted, but he wished to perhaps look at a block-by-block or lot-by-lot proposal of why properties were zoned in a particular e way, and wondered if that were possible. 10/12/77 --1 113 , Mr. Saul said Council had received synopses at varying points along the line as to how the decision had come about, noting the Blayney . report in July 1976. He said an analysis was available of why some areas were recommended for rezoning and why others were not. The Planning Commission had held hearings after receiving the Blayney report, made certain modifications, and had come to the conclusion a mixed-use zoning was appropriate. The final action by the Planning Commission deleted certain areas and a synopsis can be prepared as to why that occurred. He said Council had been given all the Planning Commission minutes on the question of mixed-use zoning that began in July 1977. Council had previously received minutes of prior Planning Commission hearings on R-4 zoning, noting it was an 80- to 90-page document, but could be supplied if Council so wished. In regard to starting the process allover again, Mr. Saul said that was an option open to City Council. He noted the Planning Commission had been dealing with this problem since July and August 1976 and it would be nice to get something resolved. Mr. Lieuallen said, as he recalled from October 10 meeting, City Attorney had advised the hearing had to be open to all persons and that might prolong the meeting. Mr. Long said that provision of the Code requires holding of a public hearing and giving notice to all interested persons on the entire matter. Mr. Obie wondered if the ordinance required just a joint meeting between Planning Commission and Councilor a joint meeting and public hearing. Jim Saul read from Code, which stated all persons interested be given notice and be invited to attend and testify. e In response to a question from Mayor Keller, City Attorney replied the zoning question would be treated as a package, and if Council takes ~ action contrary in any way, it requires a joint meeting and public testimony must be taken. Mr. Haws and Obie suggested staff research and prepare suggested changes in that portion of the Code to allow Council some options. Mr. Delay recognized Council as facing the problem of a joint meeting, noting he was not sure that is a problem. He felt it only appropriate for a joint Planning Commission and City Council meeting to take a hard look at the decision being debated, noting the Planning Commission and staff had spent considerable time in researching, studying, and holding public hearings on this item. He was not sure Council should be in a position to make changes on staff and Planning Commission's decisions without discussing such changes in a joint meeting. Mr. Lieuallen supported Mr. Delay.s remarks. He said the rationale for opening up the hearing again was that two property owners were not given the same consideration as other property owners in the area had received. He said he had never gotten that impression from reading the minutes and staff notes. He said it had been a very e 10/12/77--2 11~ lengthy process and he felt everyone had the opportunity for input. He said if the matter were going to be reopened, then he thought . Council and Planning Commission should go through the entire process again. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that a special Council meeting be held at 6 p.m. Tuesday, November 1, prior to the Planning Commission meeting, and the November 2 noon meeting be canceled. Motion carried unanimously. E. Joint meeting with Lane County Commissioners, Springfield Council, and Eugene Council--Letter distributed to Council from Commissioner Rust outlining possible agenda items. Mayor Keller said, as he read the letter, it seemed Commissioner Rust was the only Commissioner who would be attending the meeting. He did not feel that was the original intent, but that all Commissioners and all Councilors were to be present. Mr. Delay said his impression of the original proposal from Com- missioner Rust was to have representatives from each of the juris- dictions join together to discuss various items, but that Commissioner Rust was not opposed to all elected officials attending. Ms. Smith noted concern about the lengthy agenda and requested the list be narrowed down somewhat. Mr. Obie felt the City Council should not be asked to sit down with just one member of the Lane County Commissioners, and noted the agenda length might entail a e four-day session. He would like to have those comments communicated to Commissioner Rust. Manager said there were alternatives being explored by staff and options would be presented to Council at next week1s meeting. Mr. Obie agreed to delay any communication to Commissioner Rust until Council discusses the issue then. F. Request to appoint taxi rate subcommittee of Council--Memo distri- buted. Manager reviewed memo in which taxi driver-owners of Dial Cab Company were requesting an increase in taxi cab rates. Staff felt it might be helpful to have a Council subcommittee to work with staff on these issues. Mr. Haws expressed feeling uncomfortable with dealing with regulat- ing rates and wondered if there was some other alternative. Manager said there was no requirement the City regulate these rates. Mr. Haws wondered if Council wanted to spend its time each year discussing ambulance and taxi rates, and whether it might be possible to set up a rate committee to deal with these issues. He wanted staff to present other alternatives. Manager said the time element was not necessarily critical, and if e 10/12/77--3 715 he understood Mr. Haws' request, he was asking if some persons, either citizens or Councilors, could be assigned to such a committee. Assistant Manager advised Council it was in a regulatory posture at . this time, and that in the past, City Council had wanted to be in- volved. However, staff could draft proposals and recommendations to bring back to Council. Mayor Keller said he would appoint a City Council member to work with staff to prepare a proposal for dealing with rate regulations. II. ESATS--Initia1 Discussion--Memo and. Table distributed Manager said at this stage, the discussion will center around two aspects: 1) the proposed process for review of the ESATS matter; and 2) the content of the major elements of the study to date. He said actual report would be distributed in about two weeks. Jim Farah, Planning Department, reviewed the proposed process. He said the first thing to emphasize was the July 1, 1978 adopted deadline was semi-imposed by the Federal Department of Transportation. Everything was keyed from that date. In order to meet the requirements to receive funds for transportation-related projects, it was necessary to have a long-range adopted plan. He said the first review by elected officials of the plan would be in late October. In early November, a joint briefing will be held between the two city councils, the County Commissioners, and the three local planning commissions. From mid-November to January, a wi~espread public discussion will be held with input from neighborhood groups and various interested organizations in the city. In early January, a joint meeting of the three planning commissions will be held e to receive public testimony, and there could be other public hearings set up at the discretion of the Eugene Planning Commission. In mid- February, the recommendations will come to the City Council, at which time it can receive further pUblic input. In mid-March, the City Council will be asked to make a recommendation to the Metro Area Transportation . Commi ttee. Between March and May, ratification by Springfield and Eugene councils and Lane County Commission is scheduled, with ultimate rati- fication from the L-COG board. He noted there would be many meetings and it might be difficult to maintain the schedule. He said the schedule was simply a reference point to see if the plan was on target. In response to a question by Mr. Delay, Mr. Farah said the 30 days between June 1 and July 1 would be adequate time to prepare the required federal documents. Ms. Smith requested staff prepare a written month-by-month outline that had just been presented with review and action target dates indicated. Mr. Farah said that could be done. Dave Reinhard, Transportation, discussed the main elements of the plan. In reviewing the major elements of the process, he noted two years ago, the City Council had evaluated conceptual alternatives and adopted some general goals to set the direction for preparing the transportation . 10/12/77--4 l1Co plan to the year 2000. Those conceptual goals became the assumptions e on which the staff based its transportation plan. He said the plan would address the transportation needs up to the year 2000. The urban area in its entirety, and in particular the city, has a strong com- mi tment to greatly increased alt.ernat.i\te methods of transportati on other than the automobile. The str?et~ Q:~d hi gh'filay improvements woul d be considered to prevent intolerable s;'.,'eet congestion (a goal to strive for a tolerable level of servic2~. He reviewed the four major plan ehsents. The policies plan could be the most important, as it contains a multitude of recommended actions to bring about goals the City Council has set for alter'natives and load service. He said the transit, streets; and highways elements took the major part of time, as more technical ~~IOi'~~ ami in..depth analyzation of alternatives were. requi red. The transit element studied systems ranging from ex- isting systems, such as adding more buses, to exotic techniques. The recommendation arrived at was a bus rapid transit system, and he said this would be more detailed in the document Council would receive in two weeks. The streets and highway element was directed at versus cor- ridors in the urban area where there would be serious traffic overloads. Many alternatives were studied to relieving those overloads. He sai d the year 2000 target date presented some difficulties, but the summary would list the major facilities which were felt to be needed by 2000. However, he noted between now and 1990, because of lack of funds and unknown energy supply, staff ~Jas recommendi ng tryi ng to meet the goal s by improvi ng existing systems (i.e., adding to the transit system and bus routes). In regard to the financing element, Mr. Reinhard sai(~ this was a very criti- e cal area, as all levels of government were facing some funding constraints that could make other issues academic. He felt the fin3ncing element would have to be brought in at a very early point. Other elements in the plan were pedestrians, parking, paratransit, and bicycles. He said an additional item was inter-city transit element (Willamette Valley). All policy elements are dealing with the goals of trying to improve these methods of travel. He said t.here would be some recommendations to siting of downtown terminals for inter-city transit, and strong participation of the local governments with the state in its planning would be encouraged. Mr. Obie had strong feelings regarding the summQry and wanted to know when the opportune time was to express those feelings. He did not want to wait until the process and planning had gone to such a point that such input would not be useful. Mr. Farah sai d there \'/ere two early poi nts for input: 1) the meeti ngs between No'!ember and January for di scussion and input from neighborhood groups; and, more importantly 2) the possi- bility of holding Council workshops at any time. Mr. Delay noted when reviewing the growth projections for the last five years for the 1990 Plan Update, there were two major errors: the natural growth was over-estimated, and migration under-estimated. He e 10/12/77 --5 ,11 felt staff should be aware ~nd take ,into consideration the potential for making such errors, noting an uncertain energy supply and an un- e certain growth future. Both have impact potential for increasing the demand which is forecast. He wondered if the alternatives had been based on demand or on a single number factor. Mr. Farah replied the modeling process dealt with a single number, as the technology analysis necessi- tated a specific number. However, the recommendations for the plan have built-in flexibility to make it more effective, and the flexibility does accommodate any future growth. Mr. Delay said he would like to see the impact on the plan in regard to more or less demand in the same time frame. Manager said staff would be awaiting a message from L-COG setting up the first joint meeting of the planning commissions, city councils, and Lane County Commissioners for the full-scale presentation, noting November 3 or 10 had been suggested. III. Council Assistants--Memo distributed to Council. Manager reviewed memo in which job descriptions of Staff Assistant II and Staff Analyst were outlined. Staff was asking Council for comments on the job descriptions, duties, and qualifications. Mr. Delay felt the qualifications were well outlined. However, he was concerned about the duties description, as it did not outline for whom the persons would be working, did not say who would supervise, who would be directing the work, and how time is priorized for Councilors. Manager e replied an office would be set up in one of the City Council chambQrs for the two persons. The individual Councilor would ask for assistance and those people would respond. The work would also be directly related to the City Manager's office in that some person in the office would help assign workloads and supervise the work that was being done. He said Ci ty Manager staff would try to make the assistants available for maximum and immediate responses to Councilors as requested. Mr. Delay said he wished for them to work directly with Councilors and wondered if the job descrip- tion involved more a policy analysis position. Assistant Manager said staff would try to keep the assistants free to work on individual matters for Councilors, although there may be time conflicts and negotiations with the people involved would resolve those conflicts. He said as time goes on, Councilors may be presenting proposals to Council and if those were to become Council agenda items, City Manager's office would like to review those prior to becoming Council agenda items. Ms. Smith wondered, at Council work sessions, if issues were identified that would be added responsibilities to Councilors, whether these aides would be used to work on those issues. Manager replied that would result in these positions being a policy analysis group, which was one of Mr. Delay's main concerns. Mr. Delay said his needs had not been related to existing staff, as he felt they were doing a very good jOb. He was seeking individual assistance in the normal ongoing work of the Council. He said he would question that kind of use, as it would become an office of policy analysis. He saw the Council Assistants use as being for e individual Councilors' needs. 10/12/77--6 118 Mr. Obie was wondering if he had need of an assistant, whether he could call that staff person directly or whether he would have to go through e City Manager's office. Also, if he were to have a position paper re- searched, whether that paper would be available to City staff. Manager replied those ground rules would have to be worked out but depending on the nature of the request, i.e., research of a future issue, a direct call to the aide would probably be in order. In regard to position papers, these would not necessarily be considered confi~ential and a copy would be routed to Manager. Assistant Manager said in establishing ground rules, all efforts will be made to address the issues, needs, and concerns of Council. In responding to a question by Mr. Obie, Manager said if staff could research a certain position for a Councilor, it would be done by staff; otherwise, the Council assistants would be used. Mr. Lieuallen asked for clarification regarding a desire by a Councilor to pursue certain issues that might be contrary to City policy, if Councilor aides would be allowed to pursue those efforts without the report being circulated among City staff. Manager again said ground rules would have to be set up; however, before the matter would be brought to the entire City Council, it would have to be reviewed by City Manager. Assistant Manager said Council should be aware of the public records law, and the matter of ground rules between Councilors. There has to be some understanding of how the resources will be used between City Councilors as well as between staff and City Council people. Mr. Delay said he felt there was a need to have flexibility for working with these aides to bring in new ideas, but doing so without bringing e concern to any City staff. He said he was not planning to hide any proposals, but would like the flexibility to work on new ideas and new approaches. Manager said discussion of ground rules could be held October 26. IV. Code Change Re: Responsibilities of Finance Officer--Memo, table, and ordinance distributed. Manager said the main issue was to allow the Finance Officer to write checks up to $3,000 as opposed to currently $1,000 between Council meetings. Also, there was a matter of paying vendors more promptly and reducing paper work. Other items in the ordinance were house cleaning items, i.e., clearly legalizing current policy of writing checks for daily investments of City cash. C.B. 1555--Concerning duties of Finance Officer; amending Sections 2.515, 2.525, and 2.527 of Code; renumbering Section 2.530 of Code as 2.567; adding new Section 2.530, and declaring an emergency was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. . 10/12/77--7 179 --- Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at -- this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. (Councilor Lieuallen was absent for this vote.) Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18067. (Councilor Lieuallen was absent for this vote.) Ashart recess was taken. v. Public Hearing: Boundary Commission Initiated Annexation: Located adjacent to and including 1-5 right-of-way, north of the Willamette River (AI 77-15) Recommended unanimously by Planning Commission on September 26, 1977. Jim Saul, planner, said this annexation was initiated by the Boundary Commission and referred to the City for comment prior to Boundary Commis- sion final action Thursday, November 3. The property involved in the proposed annexation consists of either freeway or right-of-way, property owned by EWEB or the City of Eugene, or pUblic utilities such as the Northwest Pipeline. The purpose of the proposed annexation is to elimi- nate the present maze of special service districts which cover this area. The area of the freeway itself and adjacent properties involve an almost incomprehensible array of special districts and contradictions in the way service is delivered. The following examples were quoted as illustrative e of the situation: 1) the Willamalane Park and Recreation District extends west of 1-5 in the Alton Baker Park area and includes property presently within the City of Eugene; 2) the Oakway Water District extends east of the freeway in certain areas and includes property that should be part of Springfield; and 3) the Rainbow Water District extends west of the freeway in other areas into property which should be part of Eugene. The Boundary Commission initiated the annexation to resolve the conflicts. He said the Planning Commission had reviewed the annexation and had no objections and had given it favorable recommendation. In terms of development implementation, there is none since the property is basically freeway or pipeline right-of-way. In regard to service implementation, fire protection would simply legitimize what the City is already doing. In regard to police protection, the State Police Depart- ment has notified that the City would not be expected to patrol the freeway. Mr. Saul said this was the first issue the City would be asked to comment on. The second issue involved the illogical extension of City limits north of the Willamette River and east of the freeway, which was annexed in 1974. This is all part of Alton Baker Park, but is immediately contigu- ous to the Springfield Sewage Treatment Plant. North of the Willamette River and the center line of the freeway has been the dividing line between the two jurisdictions. It was felt this property should be released back to Springfield. . 10/12/77--8 180 -- . . Mr. Delay wondered if an island would be created if this annexation . of right-of-way were approved. Mr. Saul said three islands would be created: 1) in the area of Alton Baker Park; 2) in the area north of 1-5 south of Harlow Road; and 3) south of Beltline Road in the area of Willakenzie. Mr. Bradley felt it would be good park planning if Alton Baker Park were within one jurisdiction. He wondered what consequences would occur if this portion were allowed to become part of Springfield. Assistant Manager replied that the County owns the property and it would have no effect on the ownership of the park property, and would not change who operates the park properties. Mr. Saul said this question had been addressed several years ago when the City released certain parcels in Alton Baker Park to the County. It was understood at that time the County would remain responsible for development and planning. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve the Boundary Commission initiated annexation to Eugene of certain right- of-way sections from center line west of 1-5. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve the Planning Commission recommendation to transfer section of Alton Baker Park east of 1-5 to Springfield. Motion carried with all Council members present voting aye, except Mr. Bradley voting no. e Mr. Haws left the meeting. VI. Washington/Jefferson Park Bids--Memo attached Manager said the bids were for two items: 1) for construction of restroom and maintenance building at Washington/Jefferson Park; and 2) for construc- tion of horseshoe courts at Washington/Jefferson Park. Ed Smi th, Parks Department, said this was part of a commitment to the Federal Government to provide facilities, and was being financed by 50 percent of the grant from the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. Mayor Keller questioned the cost of the horseshoe project. Mr. Smi th said there would be 16 covered horseshoe pits, side-by-side because they were under the bridge; there would be future potential for being lighted and there had been a great amount of interest in this sport. He said ten clubs had been waiting and had participated in the design; there is a possibility of holding a statewide tournament in Eugene. Mr. Obie wondered why horseshoe pits had been selected, rather than considering building tennis courts. Ed Smith said there was not room and the cost for one tennis court was about $20,000. It was the City.s policy to build tennis courts side-by-side in conjunction with other courts, i.e., the Amazon Court area. e 10/12/77--9 181 . Mr. Obie wondered how staff arrived at the decision of horseshoe pits as a priority item rather than something else. Mr. Smith responded this was a five-year commitment and plan for Federal Government funding; there was a . commitment made on this program in the original proposal. As far as the priority, he said staff tried to stretch dollars as much as possible. He said any project connected to, or adjacent to, Willamette River or Skinner's Butte Park was popular. In the budgeting process, staff followed a priority list for programs and felt this was a priority item for this particular area of town. Mr. Obie then wondered if the decision was made for the horseshoe pits vs. tennis courts or some other recreational item because of pressure or long-range planning. Mr. Smith said this was part of long-range planning for that area. Assistant Manager noted the plan was part of the original agreement with the Federal Government, which required a design plan, and the staff was generally executing that plan at this time. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to accept low bids as recommended by staff. Motion carried unanimously. VI1. LCOG Utban Runoff Water Pollution Request--Memo and request distributed Manager noted there had been a great deal of study and negotiation on this matter and noted, in the attached memo, the suggestion had been made that the City commit itself to $5,100 rather than the requested $15,048.40. He also noted the 208 staff had been contacted, and it was found that if Springfield did not cooperate with the program, it would not be executed. Mr. Allen noted Springfield had also decided not to e participate at the requested financial level, but had not decided on a figure. . Mr. Lieuallen reviewed for Council a publication recently distributed by LCOG in which information was given regarding industrial, commercial, and residential waste that ends up in the river when rainstorms occur and there is no treatment for the pollution. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to allocate $5,100 for the study. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. Improvement Petitions Res. No. 2773--Authorizing initiating process for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer construction within Yoder Estates was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 2774--Authorizing initiating process for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer construction within Plum Tree Subdivision was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. e Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. 10/12/77 --10 182.. . . Res. No. 2775--Authorizing initiating process for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer construction within Janisse Subdivision; . storm sewers within 160 feet of the east boundary of Janisse Subdivision extended north to the Amazon Channel was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 2776--Authorizing initiating process for sanitary sewer (recon- struction of private system) between Emerald Street and Nixon Street from 24th Avenue to 25th Avenue was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 2777--Authorizing initiating process for alley paving between 10th and 11th Avenues from Lawrence Street and Lincoln Street from 10th Avenue to between 10th Avenue and 11th Avenue was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 2778--Authorizing initiating process for paving Clinton Drive from Willagillespie Road to Crenshaw Road was read by number and e title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 2779--Authorizing initiating process for paving Club Road from Country Club Road to Coburg Road was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. IX. Approval of Minutes--October 5, 1977 Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to approve Council minutes of October 5, 1977. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and passed the meeting was adjourned to October 19, 1977. c~nr!~ City Manager CTH:DT:jm/CM21blO - 10/12/77 --11 183 . CITY OF EUGENE . INTER-DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date 10-6-77 . To: CHARLES HENERY. CITY MANAGER From: O. CK MORGAN, ASSISTANT PARK SUPERINTENDENT (ACTI~G fOR ED SMITH) Subject: AWARDING Of CONTRACTS FOR WASHI~GTON/JEFfERSON PARK ON Oc T. 5, 1977 BIOS WERE OPENED fOR CONSTRUCTION OF A CONCRETE Bt. 0 C K AND PLASTER RESTROOM AND MAINTENANCE BUILDING AT WASHINGTON/ JEFFEqSON PARK. THE RESULTS WERE A FOLLOWS: J. E. BECK Co. ~U"L01 . 00 POWELL INDUSTRIAL BUILDERS, I NC. 117, 9Q9. 00 OfFICE ESTIMATE 1)2, 000 TO Lt5,ono I RECOMMEND THE BID BV J. E. BECK Co. BE ACCEPTED. ON OCT. 6, 1977 BIDS WERE OPENED F~R THE CONSTRUCTION OF HORSESHOE CbURTS AT WASHINGTON/ JEFFERSON PARK. WORK INCLUDES EXCAVATION, IRRIGATION REVISIONS, ROCK FILL, PAVING, AND FENCING. THE RESUl TS WERE AS FOLLOWS: e WILDISH CONSTRUCTION CO. $27,562.~0 POWELL INDUSTRIAL BUILDERS, J NC. 26,640.00 OfFICE ESTIMATE 22,000 TO 2~,OOO I RECOMMEND TH E RID BV Pow ELL INDUSTRIAL BUILDERS, INC. BE ACCEPTED BOTH PROJECTS ARE FUNDED AS FOLLOWS: 50% MATCHING GRANT FROM THE BUREAU Of OUTDOOR PECREATION 50% CI TV FUNDS (' 0, (\lo,~ ~~C~.~. 01 CK MORGAN " e lSq. \~