Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/09/1977 Meeting .- M I NUT E S tit EUGENE CITY COUNCIL November 9, 1977 Adjourned meeting from October 26, 1977, of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by Council President Eric Haws at 12 noon, King's Table, Oakway Mall, with the following Council members present: D. W. Hamel, Tom Williams, Ray Bradley, Jack Delay, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, and Betty Smith. Mayor Gus Keller was absent. II. Pedestrian Safety Award Presentation John McDonald, Oregon Automobile Club, expressed pleasure in awarding to the City of Eugene a special citation for casualty record in the 1977 AAA Pedestrian Safety contest for cities in the 50,000-100,000 population category. He said Eugene's pedestrian death rate for the contest rate of 1976 was 1.1 per 100,000, compared to the rate of 2.2 for the average of all cities in its population group. The AAA gave awards to 320 cities throughout the United States; this was the ninth AAA pedestrian award to be won by the City of Eugene. He presented a plaque commemorating the award to President Haws. He said he received pleasure in working with the City of Eugene e and felt the City was doing an excellent job and outstanding effort in pedestrian safety. President Haws accepted the plaque on behalf of the City. I. Items from Mayor and Council A. Handicapped Commission--Manager noted letter of resignation re- ceived from Rodney Bossart. He said the past procedure had been for an alternate to be officially appointed by the Council and staff recommended following that procedure. The alternate was Paul Martinez. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to approve the appoint- ment of Paul Martinez to the Handicapped Commission for a term ending 1/1/78. Motion carried unanimously. B. National League Conference, San Francisco, December 3 -7-- Manager noted the necessity for Council to appoint two voting delegates and one alternate for this convention. He said it had been usual practice for the Mayor and President of the Council to be delegates, and one alternate to be chosen. Mr. Haws noted he had been a delegate last year and felt someone else might like to have that position this year. e 11/9/77--1 81. 't I ., Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that Mayor Keller . and Bill Hamel be the two voting delegates for the City of Eugene; Betty Smith to be named alternate. Motion carried unanimously. C. November 28, Monday night Council meeting--Manager noted although the second reading of the Human Rights Ordinance regarding sexual orientation would not involve a public hearing, it was anticipated there may be a large crowd present. He asked Counci1's consideration of location for the meeting in order to accommodate a large number. A list of various meeting places located within the city was distributed to Council, and Manager noted Council could discuss at a later meeting whether or not it preferred to move the meeting from the Council Chamber. Mr. Delay wondered if there was any possibility of a local TV station or some other mechanism, to be used to broadcast the Council meeting. Ms. Rutter said she would check with KOlI. Ms. Smith felt the public should be notified that this would not be a public hearing, and felt Council should stay at the Chamber for its meeting. Mr. Bradley said there was a possibility Council could decide by majority vote to reopen the public hearing that night. He said Council would then find itself in the same situation as occurred at the October 24 meeting. Mr. Haws questioned whether any Council members wanted the public hearing opened or preferred to have the meeting held elsewhere. Mr. Obie indicated he would e like to have the pUblic hearing reopened, noting the inability of many of the people to testify or get into the Chamber to hear the testimony. Mr. Williams agreed with Mr. Obie, noting the number who were restricted at the public hearing. However, he continued, the process had been completed and he saw no point in opening the public hearing again. Mr. Haws agreed, saying he did not think there would be any more testimony presented that had not already been heard by Council. Mr. Haws wondered if there were any way those attending the meeting November 28 could be evenly divided between pros and cons. Mr. Lieua11en felt that would be difficult to deal with, noting it would amount to saying some could and some could not attend. Mr. Haws ended the conversation by saying City Manager would make the decision. Mr. Haws passed to Councilors a packet of letters received regarding the Sexual Orientation Amendment. He requested when Council had finished reading them, to return them to Dee. e. 11/9/77--2 8'30 D. Combined Meeting of Mayors, City Councils, and Lane Commissioners-- . Manager said Springfield had suggested the meetinQ of all three groups Friday, November 18, 11:30 a.m., Thunderbird Estate Room. The purpose of the discussion would be to have a thorough, in-depth discussion and presentation on economic development arrangements for the Metro area. He said this meeting date had been suggested, as L-COG Council and City Council's representative would be re- quired to vote on the economic development issue at the December 1 meeting. E. Budget Committee Meeting--Manager said a Committee meeting would be held Thursday, December 1, 7:30 p.m., McNutt Room. Three budget appointments need to be made before that date. Discussion will revolve around the five-year forecast, budget proceedings and scheduling for 1977-78, and areas of emphasis and de-emphasis. F. Council Meeting, November 23--Manager requested Councilors indicate plans to attend to ensure a quorum. A consensus of Councilors determined there would be a quorum. G. Introductions--Manager introduced Don Nelson, reporter for the Register-Guard, who would be taking Lee Wilkinson's place. Also introduced was Kent Gorham, Human Rights Specialist in the City Manager's Office. Mr. Gorham had graduated from Rutgers University as an attorney, worked for several years for TWA, had spent time as a teacher in New York City, and also been affiliated with the e Peace Corps in Brazil. H. L-COG Make-up Session on T-2000 Plan--A make-up session has been scheduled for Thursday, November 10, at 7 a.m. in the L-COG conference room. This would be for City Councilors, Mayors, and Lane Commissioners who had missed the November 8 presentation. Mr. Haws wondered if the presentations would be made to different neighborhood groups in the city. John Porter, Planning Department, said that was true; however, this special make-up session was just for City officials. He said a calendar of presentations for neighborhood groups would be presented to Council. 1. 1990 Metro Plan Policy Committee--Mr. Bradley said a meeting would be held Thursday, November 10, 7 a.m., Carrow's Restaurant, Springfield. J. Tri-Agency Policy Board--Mr. Bradley reported on the meeting last week with the following decisions made: 1) The issue of required amendment to establish a spay-neuter clinic had been referred to the attorneys of the three jurisdictions, with the decision from them expected by November 15. The Policy Board will have 15 days thereafter to resolve any differences and make a recommendation back to the three jurisdictions. 2 ) The Policy Board affirmed that additional amendment to the original agreement was not needed for a spay-neuter program. The Board asked the various jurisdictions to reconfirm the September amendment to the Tri-Agency agreement which e had been passed by Lane County and Eugene, but not by Springfield; 11/9/77--3 83/ 3 ) The Policy Board asked Springfield to exercise its option . to purchase the property for the pound. Springfield had done so at a special Council meeting and Mr. Bradley understood the property had been purchased. He said a Tri-Agency Policy Board meeting would be held at noon, Thursday, November 10, in the City Council Chamber. Manager said he had signed the various documents for acquisition of the property, but the details of how the three jurisdictions will work together for a spay-neuter clinic have yet to be resolved. K. Budget Committee Appointment-- Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to appoint Joseph Soderberg, 112 East 13th Avenue, to the Budget Committee for a term expiring 12/31/80. Mr. Bradley asked for a biographical sketch. Mr. Obie responded Mr. Soderberg was a partner with Les Anderson, a successful business~ man in the community, and knew much about budget processing. Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. L. Appointments to Boards and Commissions--Mr. Haws acknowledged receipt of list Commission members for reappointment, indicating attendence records. His concern was whether the excused absences created a hardship for the work of the commissions. He asked for e Council feedback. Mr. Williams said there were two sides to the question: Whether there was a hardship to the commission by those persons not being in attendence; or whether the group was doing anything worthwhile otherwise making it a low-priority meeting. Mr. Haws wondered what City policy was regarding persons being appointed to commissions and boards, then moving out of the city while they were still serving their terms. Assistant Manager replied in Council's By-Laws, a person must be a resident of the city at the time of appointment. If the person moved from the city after appointment, the person was allowed to complete his term of office. Mr. Obie returned to Mr. Haws. concern about attendence on the commission and whether the commissions were functioning, making them a low-priority item for commission members. He said it might be important, in light of the amount of money being spent on the commissions, to look at that question more thoroughly. Mr. Haws said if any Councilor wished that item to be discussed further at a Council meeting, to contact City Manager. . 11/9/77--4 g3t III. Police Services: Initial Discussion--Memo distributed to Council. e Manager reported this was one of the items targeted by Council at its special work session regarding Council goals. He said Chief Brooks would review the memo which had been distributed and then proceed with a question and answer period. Chief Brooks said the memo submitted to the City Manager concerned possible courses of action the City could take to reduce crime. He had listed the items in order of his priority for programs which Council should consider, noting there could be additional programs developed or added as the year progresses. He then reviewed the memo and various programs: A. Personnel Resources--He noted the Police Department was understaffed in all positions. He said no new programs could be developed or existing programs expanded without an increase in personnel. He said a study of various cities was conducted and the results indi- cated that the Eugene Police Department needed to increase its staff by 23 police officers to gain a reasonable standard of manning. He said one indication of this undermanning was that the most frequent complaint the Police Department received from citizens concerned the length of time it took for a police officer to respond to a ca 11 . He noted there were just enough officers to respond to emer- gency calls. He feared in the event of a major emergency occurring in the Eugene area, the Police Department would be undermanned. e B. Space--He invited Councilors to walk through the Police Department to see the crowded conditions existing. He also noted the Department was understaffed in Records and Communications sections and had no full-time personnel assigned to crime analysis, research and development, and planning. C. Primary Crime Problem--Chief Brooks noted the juvenile involvement in theft and burglary was not unique to Eugene. He indicated he would like to obtain more information and submit to Council for consideration a more sophisticated diversion program for youth and to determine why juvenile crime is such a problem. He noted existence of a youth diversion program at the Lane County level, and indicated he would like to talk to those persons involved to determine whether a major metro area diversion program could be established. D. Communications--He noted the duplication of public safety communi- cation networks and consideration of a system with a workable 911 System. E. Crime Victim Assistance--He intended to request Federal funding early next year for a possible program for victim assistance. He asked for strong Council support of this program. e 11/9/77 --5 833 F. Noise--He noted more and more complaints being received by the Police Department about noise pollut~on, indicating those to be e traffic and machinery problems more than party noise. He under- stood there was a proposed ordinance addressing this problem. G. Big City Crime Problems--He said it is important Councilors realize Eugene is no longer a nice little city, but a large city now. Symptoms of increasing big city problems are beginning to appear in Eugene. He said there had been a reduction in most of the major crim~ and it might seem strange that the Police Department was asking for more police officers. However, he said the City should not be complacent, noting the increasing number of calls for special police services. He noted cooperation by the pUblic with the police had helped somewhat in reducing some of the crimes, and this awareness of the potential problem by the community was of assistance to the Police Department. Mr. Haws indicated most of the programs outlined appeared to necessitate going through the Budget Committee process first. Ms. Smith wondered if Chief Brooks would provide Council with a budget breakdown of the various programs outlined. Chief Brooks said that could be done. In response to a question by Ms. Smith regarding a youth diversion program, Chief Brooks said he would like to talk to people in the county to see what they are doing and to get an opinion and ideas on what is needed for such a program. He noted this would be an entire metro area program, with strong support from the City of Eugene. He e said the same was true of the communications 911 System. Mr. Delay wondered if the 911 System would require a major capital investment. Chief Brooks replied most of the equipment would have to be replaced and it would cost considerable money. Assistant Manager reviewed for Council that the last time such a system had been explored, the cost estimate was $100,000. He said a centralized dispatch system would probably involve some major equipment changes and major physical plans. He said it would be a major investment. Mr. Bradley requested from Chief Brooks a report of the amount of money needed for the programs, the kinds of programs, federal money available, and what on-going programs were being supported. Mr. Obie requested City Manger to prepare for the Budget Committee a proposal that would outline the total number of dollars requested for the proposed increase of 23 police officers. Assistant Manager said that could be done, but the difficulty with that approach was a diversion from past practice of management trying to blend the diverse priorities from various departments. He noted it would cost approximately $1/2 million for the 23 officers. Assistant Manager felt the discussion should be presented to the Budget Committee first before staff spent its time in preparing such a proposal for one department. e 11/9/77--6 B3Y Mr. Lieuallen felt Mr. Obie1s request was saying that the Police . Department had No. 1 priority on budget monies. He said that was not necessarily the case, and he felt it was the Budget Committee's place to decide what priorities should be made. If staff were going to present information for just the Police Department, then Mr. Lieuallen felt that same information should be presented for all departments. It seemed an implication that the Police Department had No.1 priorities on budget monies. Manager noted the December 1 Budget Committee meeting would deal with that question exactly, the emphasis versus de-emphasis of service needs on budget monies. IV. Public Hearing: Withdrawal from Oakway Water District Manager noted this was a routine legal hearing to allow the withdrawal to avoid double taxation. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. C. B. 1563--Authorizing withdrawal from Oakway Water District that property annexed by Final Order No. 442 on October 6, 1977, was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous e consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18072. --------------- V. Schedule Public Hearings December 21, 1977 Manager noted the public hearing for the street and easement vacations had been scheduled for this meeting; however, because legal notification was not properly executed, it was necessary to reschedule the public hearings for December 21, 1977. C.B. 1551--Calling public hearing December 21, 1977 re: right-of-way vacation located between South Willamette and Donald streets, south of Coachman (Leavitt) (SV 77-4) Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. e 11/9/77--7 ~5 Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved . and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18058. C.B. 1552--Calling public hearing December 21, 1977 re: Street vacation, a portion of Spy Glass Drive located south of Cal Young Road, and east of Hammock Street (Oakway Development Company) (SV 77-8) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18059. C.B. 1553--Calling public hearing December 21, 1977 re: Public utility easement vacation located between Pattison and Avalon streets and between Jacobs and Hughes streets (Smith)(EV 77-4) was read by council bill number and title only, there being . no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18060. VI. Public Hearing: New Liquor License Application Park Place Partners, RMB, New Outlet, 756 West Park Street; Unthank, Chase, Nuemoeller, and Paffrath Manager said the OLCC report indicated no objectors and staff found all papers in order and had no objections. Public hearing was opened. e 11/9/77--8 83h Sharon Poticha, 767 Willamette, Manager of Smeede Hotel, indicated e her approval of the application. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to forward with approval to OLCC. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Parks Department: Land Acquisitions and Eminent Domain Authorization-- Memo and map distributed. Manager noted the actions for Council today would be to: 1) Authorize executing an option for purchasing the property (Parcels 5 and 6); and 2) Authorize acquisition by power of eminent domain for 12 other parcels. He said this action will result in City-controlled property, with the exception of one parcel, along the Willamette Greenway, between the Ferry Street Bridge and Beltline Road. The estimated total cost would be $423,000; 50 percent paid by the Bureau of Recreation money, 25 percent by State, and 25 percent by the City. He said the acquisi- tions had been approved by the Greenway Agency. If there was a need to discuss any individual parcels, Manager noted that would have to take place in Executive Session. Mr. Obie wondered if the recent serial levy passed by the voters had indicated the money was to be used for this purchase. Ed Smith, Parks Director, said the serial levy funds specifically stated they would e be used to purchase river front property. Funds from the 1971 bond issue specified acquisitions in this area also. Mr. Obie wondered how much money was to be spent from each. Mr. Smith replied of the $105,000 total, $67,000 would come from the bond issue, and the remainder from the serial levy monies. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to authorize City Manager to execute option for purchase of property (Parcels 5 and 6) within Willamette Greenway, located between Ferry Street Bridge and Beltline Road. Roll call vote. The motion carried with all Councilors voting aye, except Mr. Williams voting no. Res. No. 2787--Authorizing acquisition by condemnation of properties located within Willamette Greenway, between Ferry Street Bridge and Beltline Road was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried with all Council members present voting aye, except Mr. Williams voting no. VIII. Calling Public Hearing re: Street Vacation C.B. 1567--Calling public hearing December 21, 1977 re: Street vacation, located between Minnesota and Dakota streets, north of Barger Drive was read by council bill number and title only, there e being no Council bill present requesting it be read in full. 11/9/77--9 837 Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Del'ay, that the bill be read e the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18073. IX. Resolutions Res. No. 2788--Amending FAA Grant offer for Airport Development Project was read by number and title. Manager said this was for an additional $600,000 to the original grant offer. This money had not been included in the original grant offer, because the FAA had not had the final order to authorize distribution. This resolution simply accepts those funds. Res. No. 2789--Endorsing need for improvement of Highway 99 from Airport Road to Junction City was read by number and title. Manager noted the resolution had not been received by Manager's Office and would be omitted from this agenda. e Res. No. 2790--Authorizing transfer of funds to replace hot water heating system at Lane County Correctional Facility was read by number and title. Manager said the heating system at the jail needed repair and City was bound by a legal agreement to contribute 50 percent toward maintenance costs until the new facility was built. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to adopt the Resolutions. 2788 and 2790. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. X. Code Amendments C.B. 1556--Manager said the companies operating silent alarm systems were not notifying the Police until they had conducted their own investigation of an alarm set off. The Police Department felt it was losing opportunities to apprehend perpetrators and this amendment would require the Police to be notified first, who would then notify the alarm source to notify owners. He said the present situation allows intruders to escape and endangers the owners who go to investigate. e , 11/9/77--10 838 . . , " Mr. Delay said it seemed the amendment would put an increased . burden on the City and also would be assuming servicing of that business by having alarms coming into the Police Department first. He said it would increase the workload for the Police Department and assume part of the services being provided by these agencies. Chief Brooks replied a good alarm system is the best intruder catcher there is. It had been the experience of the Police Department that the alarm companies are trying to catch the intruders. This action delays response time by the Police Department and sometimes endangers the life of any managerial persons who might be in the building. He said it has happened, also, that burglar alarm companies have called the building and end up talking to the intruder, who indicates there is no problem. He said these were the kinds of responses the Police Department wanted to reach without any delay. Mr. Delay again said the Police Department would then be assuming this service, but noted he was not opposed to that. He wondered if this would be actually duplicating the services already provided, and whether the City should be providing those services. Mr. Bradley left the meeting. Assistant Manager reviewed for Council that originally the calls were coming to the Police Department, with the resultant jamming of Police circuits, especially when there happened to be a malfunctioning alarm system. Staff had asked that calls go through an answering service so that incoming lines at City Hall would not be affected. He said the e present situation is one in which the alarm systems are calling the owners and the whole efficiency of the alarm system has been diminished. Some will not call the Police first, but call the owner. He said this amendment would be one way to make this service work in a more regulated manner. Chief Brooks reiterated that by calling the owner first, the alarm companies are creating a delay for the Police Department to respond. He felt the alarms should be reported directly to the Police Department and noted he would oppose having a private police source checking out the grounds of any business where an alarm had gone off. He again said the Police Department was being notified too late, and in some cases, not at all. Mr. Delay wondered if this was going to place an extra demand on the Police Department to respond, especially during the night shifts. Chief Brooks replied these were cases in which he felt the Police Department must respond. Mr. Williams wondered what percentage of the alarms that are now in use, do notify the owners rather than the Police Department. Chief Brooks estimated about half. Mr. Williams said then it seems that if a system was so unsatisfactory, the word would soon get around and people would jump to the opportunity to have the Police notified. Chief Brooks said that just is not happening. He wanted the Police Department to be able to respond to such alarms, to avoid endangering of lives and preventing any tragedy occurring. - 11/9/77--11 ~9 J " . . Mr. Williams then wondered if the government had a right to direct . individuals or suppliers of information and regulate them in the use of that information. Stan Long, City Attorney, said that question had been looked at, and it was concluded that police power of the city was sufficiently broad to indicate it could protect a police department from being disabled. He said there was a question of balancing the danger that a police officer thinks is present, as opposed to an individual who does not call the Police Department first. He said that kind of balancing justifies such action. Mr. Lieuallen wondered if there could be an amendment to give the property owner the choice of calling the Police Department; and whether there was a system of fines that could be instituted for false alarms. Assistant Manager noted the use of an answering service had eliminated the problem of continuing false ala.rms. He said the last time this problem arose, it was determined the most effective way to deal with the problem was with the supplier of the alarm systems, noting there were licensing and registration procedures required for alarm operators. Mr. Williams continued he was very troubled in the sense that it seemed to him that if someone wanted to get himself killed, that was his private decision; the government should not say he can or cannot. He felt the same held true for alarm system reports. However, he said, that if, in fact, it were a problem where a police officer's life was in danger because of an intruder in the building with a gun or an owner with a gun, then he felt it was a City Council problem. He noted there had been no testimony from any of the owners or alarm companies. He felt it necessary . for Council to have input from those people most affected before it takes any action. Chief Brooks responded the Police Department wanted to try to reduce to zero the chances of someone getting hurt or killed. The delay in response time for the Police Department was his main concern, as this would give an advantage to the intruder'who might be desperate and his action could lead to a tragedy. He said in the past, some statements from City Manager's Office or some City official might have some effect, but it was not a long-lasting effect. C.B. 1556--Concerning alarm monitoring service; amending Section 3.661 of Code 1971; and declaring an emergency, was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Williams moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to schedule the item for another Council meeting, allowing for further input from those affected. Motion carried unanimously. 11/9/77--12 - g~o ~ , . . . - C.B. 1557--Manager noted under the present Code a loophole existed in that an owner may mean husband and wife and Code does not say that under such circumstances neither one may own assets in excess of certain amounts to qualify. He said this would clear up the ambiguity regarding the husband-wife ownership of property in qualifying for deferred assessments. C.B. 1557--Concerning deferral or extension of assessments; amending Sections 7.195, 7.120, and 7.215 of Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency, was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council memeber present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbere 18074. IX. Approval of Minutes e Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Delay to approve the Council minutes of October 19 and 26, 1977. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Delay requested Chief Brooks to provide for Council the financial implica- tions regarding the proposed alarm monitoring system, and the pOSSibility of offering that as a City service. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and passed, the meeting was adjourned to November 16, 1977. c~e?r~ City Manager DT:ml/CM7a14 e 8J.f/ 11/9/77--13