HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/14/1978 Meeting
_._._~ -----
M I NUT E S
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
- August 14, 1978
Adjourned meeti ng from Augu.st 2, 1978, of the Ci ty Council of the Ci ty of
Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by Mayor Gus Keller August 14, 1978, 7:30
p.m., in the Council Chambers, with the following Council members present: D.W.
Hamel, Ray Bradley, Jack Delay, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, and Betty Smith.
Councilors Tom Williams and Eric Haws were absent.
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Request for Consideration as Historic Landmarks: Preston Building,
Hall Building, and Portland Store (H 78-1), located on east side of
Willamette Street between 8th and 9th avenues.
Approved by Historic Review Board May 25, 1978. Memo and map have been
distributed to Council members.
Manager commented that some Council members wish to tour the three
buildings. This tour could take place the Wednesday before the next
Monday night Council meeting. If so, final action could not occur
until August 28th.
Judy Rees, HCC, gave background information which led to the recom-
mendation that these three buildings be established as historic land-
e ma rk s . It was determined that the three Willamette Street buildings
merit recognition because of I} their representative character of a
period of architecture; 2} their extraordinary architectural merit by
reason of their detailing; and 3} their relationship to the broad
cultural history of the city. In March of 1977, the City, in the
process of amending its Community Development Block Grant for conver-
sion of the Central Eugene Urban Renewal Project, were requested by
the State Historic Preservation office to conduct a survey of the
proposed project area and in particular, of the four older buildings
along the east side of Willamette Street between 8th and Broadway,
south of the U.S. Bank, and north of the Hoffman building. Based on
the survey, the State Historic Preservation office determined that
"the three southerly buil di ngs coul d be determi ned el i gibl e for
nomination to the national register of Historic Places" and that the
buildings should be "carefully and scientifically analyzed in order to
determine the feasibility of their being rehabilitated for adaptive
use.1I After a joint meeting with ERA and the Historic Review Board,
ERA proposed a compromise offer to the Historic Review Board. It was
that only the most southerly building (the Portland Store) be desig-
nated a historic landmark and that the other two buildings could be
demolished in any redevelopment proposal. At a meeting on May 25, the
Historic Review Board decided to propose that all three buildings be
designated as historic landmarks based on the criteria previously
outlined.
-
8/14/78--1
552.
----~
Glenn Mason, 1980 West 24th, commented that historic landmarks used to
e be buildings that were famous because of people who had stayed
there, 1 i ved there, or had otherwi se been associ ated wi th the buil di ngs.
He feels that notion is now dying down. He said the Historic Review
Board feels the buildings have broad cultural historic impact. He
then presented slides showing some of the history of Eugene, the types
of buildings that were here in the first place, and the subsequent
impact that having these buildings designated as historic landmarks
would have on the city's heritage. He said the three buildings in
question are commercial buildings and of a very simple use, but that
is what made Eugene what it is today.
Charles Kupper, HCC Director, commented that both the Historic Review
Board and the Renewal Agency have struggled intensively with the issue.
He felt that, while Mr. Mason's presentation was a good one, it indicates
that what constitutes history might be a highly subjective standard. He
reviewed the notes given to Council earlier in that the ERA's position
is that it disputes the historic relevance of the buildings. He also
said that, if the Renewal Agency is limited to restoration, the potential
tax return will be much less. He said the tax return on new construction
would be about $50,000 annually whereas for rehabilitation it would only
be about $20,000.
Mr. Hamel questioned how those buildings fit into the plan for downtown
development. Mr. Kupper responded he did not believe the three build-
ings were included as possible to be rehabilitated.
e Frank Shearer, 2425 Wilson Drive, representing the Eugene Renewal
Agency, said he feels some people view the ERA's actions as bulldozer
kinds of attitudes. He said in fact the Board did much soul-searching
on thi smatter. He said that the ERA operates under a plan adopted
much earlier and he doubts if, at this stage, the board can change the
plan by leaving buildings that were marked for demolition.
Council members declared ex parte contacts and conflicts of
interest. Mayor Keller said he received calls on both sides of
the issue but that he did not think it would affect his decision.
Mrs. Smith said she received one phone call which was not a
conflict. Mr. Hamel said he had two phone calls and he responded
that he could not talk about the matter. Mr. Obie said he had
calls on both sides which he didn't think would affect his
decision. Mr. Bradley said he received phone calls and indicated
he could not listen to the content of the calls.
Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of the record.
Public hearing was opened.
Dan Childress, 1845-1/2 University, commented that buildings of this
size were most appropriate to the area. He said the downtown area
needs to keep solar exposure coming to the park blocks so it is
desirable to keep the size of the buildings down.
e 8/14/78--2
553
He feels strongly that the buildings need to be saved. He says
emotionally the city needs them and he feels that economically it is
- possible to be done.
Laverne Edwards, 1260 President, feels it is sad to erase the work of
forefathers. She would call attention to the LCDC Plan, Goal 5, which
directs cities in their historic preservation plan to preserve buil-
dings. She said that all the public historic buildings are gone so
some of the historically valuable commercial buildings need to be
saved.
Marston Morgan, 1843 Garden Avenue, s~owed drawings of how the buil-
dings would look if restored. The drawings were entered into the
record. He said he is under retainer to a potential developer for the
property. They are seriously interested in preserving the buildings.
He feels that those who say the historic standards don't apply to
these buildings are persons that are not familiar with Eugene's
heritage. He also did not feel it was necessary to make any decision
"tonight." He argued that proposals should be accepted from various
developers and then a more reasonable decision could be made.
John Matott, 4439 Fox Hollow Road, would underscore the importance of
the designation as historic landmarks. He said that without that
designation the tax incentives are not available which could be offered.
Martha Filer, 235 East 3rd, said that the National Register should
be used when designating historic sites. She feels it is distressing
e that the ERA can use so much time to find a way to demolish buildings
but that during that time no one else can present their proposals
. for rehabilitation.
William A. Leady, 1650 Pearl, said it is obvious that these buildings
have historic value.
Clark Cox, 1085 Patterson, Apt. 9, said that, as long as there are
so few old buildings left, as many should be saved as is possible.
Sherry E. Nesbit, 22-1/2 West 17th, said that saving of the last of
the buildings in the downtown area far outweighs the tax dollar
investment.
Philip Dole, 930 East 21st, member of the State Advisory Committee
on Historic Preservation, but speaking as an individual, said these
three buildings contribute to Eugene's background and provide examples
of the simple smaller type of structure.
Jon Christenson, 1682-B Hayes Street, feels that the Renewal Agency
proposals are anti-development. By not designating the three buil-
dings as historic landmarks, it would discourage development to the
property--not encourage it.
e
8/14/78--3
55'1-
----~. -_.__._--~~ ---- --- -~
Lewis Hoffman, 275 Sunset Drive, commented that the Portland Building
was originally his family's building. When the Renewal Agency came I
e downtown, engineers carefully studied the building and determined it
should be condemmed. Since he had to vacate the building, he does not
feel that anyone else should come in and get a free tax ride from the
government. He says it would be a waste of taxpayers' money to fix up
buildings that old and run down. It would be nearly impossible to
bring the three buildings up to Code. He said they are not historic
monuments and the business community is against having them left
the re.
Bart Walsh, 200 S. Mill Street, Springfield, said he has been retained
by investors interested in developing a mixed-use facility which
involves all of the properties in question. He said studies indicate
I that the property can be developed at a much higher density than
currently exists. In the study was covered level of user demand,
proximity to activity interface, zoning, compatibility with the
I 1990 Plan, etc. In that regard they have requested that the ERA
consider a four or five-story structure of about 50 to 60,000 square
feet.
I Charles Wickizer, 1220 Oakway, supports the Renewal Agency recommen-
dati on. He feels the agency has done a super job in mixing old and
I new downtown.
I Navarre Davis, 1806 Cal Young Road, felt the buildings do not have
true historical merit, but rather that they are small, insignificant
e structures.
Vincent Farina, 1407 East 21st, said that in travelling around the
United States he has seen many buildings preserved for the sake of
keeping old buildings. In many of those cases the towns have become
ghost towns. The reason is that the buildings were not conducive to
doing business. He feels that preserving junk is ridiculous.
Vern Hoffman, 881 Willamette, said that, as a former owner of the
Portland Building, he was told that the building was not adequate.
He was told that the building would be torn down. He said that the
City is not fulfilling its word to him and his firm if the building
does not, in fact, get demolished.
George Mattox, 4410 Hilyard, said he wants to see the Renewal Agency
plan continued as it was first formulated.
Joe Richards, 777 High, ERA Attorney, said it has been suggested to
him that there may be a legal obligation to the Hoffmans regarding
the Portland building.
Otto Poticha, 1820 Kona, said he also is a potential developer for
the site and has been waiting for over a year to make a proposal.
He does not feel the buildings are historically restorable, but he
does feel that adaptive re-use is the most plausible idea. He
, suggested that proposals be allowed to be made first, whether for
e demolition or restoration.
8/14/78--4
555
Jan Muller, 1670 Fairmont, would contend that the buildings are
e historically signficant. As to meeting the Code standards, he
doesn1t feel that there is a building downtown 12 to 15 years old that
would meet the Code since it changes so often.
Public Hearing was closed.
Charles Kupper, HCC, referred to suggestions that the ERA receive
proposals for the property. He said that on March 17, at a joint
meeting, the Renewal Agency proposed to the Historic Review Board that
the Historic Review Board not designate the buildings as landmarks and
that the ERA would invite proposals to include new and restorative
proposals. He said the Renewal Agency modified it at a later date and
at the May 25 meeting suggested that the oldest of the three be
preserved in some way. He said the Renewal Agency does want to see
what is out there in the way of proposals.
Mayor Keller wondered if there is a deadline on applications for
development. Mr. Kupper responded that from October through February
of last year the properties were not really on the market because they
were tied up in negotiations on certain proposals. Mr. Obie wondered
if it was timely to seek proposals and, if so, what would be a reason-
able period of time. Mr. Kupper said that any time is timely. He
said it might take a couple of months to get invitations for proposals
which could be accepted for 60 days or so. Six months is a realistic
length of time for the entire process. Mrs. Smith wondered about the
legal implications regarding the Hoffmans. Joyce Benjamin, City
e Attorney, said she thinks it would depend on the documents transferring
the property from the Hoffmans to the City. Mayor Keller's suggestion
is that a tour should be taken of the properties and that staff be
instructed to bring people with expertise and a commitment not to be
involved in the particular program.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mrs. Smith, to table the decision for
two weeks, pending a tour by Council of the facilities. Motion
carried, Mr. Delay, Mr. Hamel, and Mrs. Smith voting aye, Mr.
Lieuallen, Mr. Bradley, and Mr. Obie voting no, and Mr. Keller
breaking the tie by voting aye.
There was a question whether the tour was open to the public and
it was pointed out that the tour is not a public meeting but the press
has always been invited to attend.
B. Requests for Financial Assistance to Historic Landmarks: Oregon
Electric Depot, Lane County Clerks Building, and Smeede Hotel.
Approved by Historic Review Board May 25, 1978. Maps have been
distributed to Council members.
Manager explained that the three requests for financial assistance
were selected from a field of six. Questions to be concerned with
were whether the City should provide money for already restored
e buildings. It was the Historic Review Board's recommendation that the
three buildings merited the grants.
8/14178--5
55&
Judy Rees, HCC, repeated that only three of the six buildings were
e recommended. She said the Cal Young House is changing ownership
and some of the money already allocated to it had not been spent.
Funds had been requested for the Christian House for renovation of the
backyard. Since the backyard is not visually accessible to the public
and one requirement is that a person walking by can enjoy the dollars
spent on the building, it was not recommended for funding. Funds were
also requested for the Caulkins House to repair the interior of the
basement wall. However, because of the $14,000 already allocated it,
it seemed as though some others were in greater need.
No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared
by Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of
the record.
Public hearing was opened.
Clark Cox, 1085 Patterson Street, Apt. 9, said he was disappointed
that the Cal Young and Caulkins houses were not getting a recommend-
ation, though he has no objection to the Clerks' House nor the Oregon
Electric Depot.
Jan Muller, 1670 Fairmont, suggested that the Council grant all
three requests.
Public hearing was closed.
e Mr. Delay questioned the guidelines on allocations because of limited
resources the Board has. Mr. Muller said that in the past the Historic
Review Board has had the contention that, if a structure on the list
is suffering any serious structural damage, that should be funded.
Ms. Rees added that the Historic Preservation ordinance says that
owners may seek assistance for repair and/or renovation.
Mr. Obie said he appreciates the significance of restorative efforts,
but he feels the enterprises are economically vital and should be able
to do their own repairs. Mr. Keller agreed with Mr. Obie.
Res. No. 2980--Authorizing financial assistance request for the
Oregon Electric Depot in the amount of $4,928.33
was read by number and title.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings supporting
financial assistance as set forth in Historic Review Board staff
notes and minutes of May 25, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto
and that the resolution be adopted. .Motion failed, Mr. Delay and
Mr. Lieuallen voting aye, and Mr. Hamel, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Obie,
and Mrs. Smith voting no.
Res. No. 2981--Authorizing financial assistance request for the Smeede
Hotel in the amount of $4,728.23 was read by number and
title.
e
8/14/78--6
~7
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings supporting
financial assistance as set forth in Historic Review Board staff
e notes and minutes of May 25, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto
and that the resolution be adopted. Motion failed, Mr. Delay and
Mr. Lieuallen voting aye and Mr. Hamel, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Obie, and
Mrs. Smith voting no.
Res. No. 2982--Authorizing financial assistance request for the Lane
County Clerk's building in the amount of $344.98 was
read by number and title.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings supporting
financial assistance as set forth in Historic Review Board staff
notes and minutes of May 25, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto
and that the resolution be adopted.
Mr. Obie said it did not seem appropriate for the City to allocate
funds before the County had a chance to consider funding, since the
building in question is a County building. Mr. Bradley sees no
difference between this request and the first two. Mr. Delay concurred,
stating that the City created Historic Preservation and designated
places as historic monuments and that it should back up that ordinance.
If the proposals are rejected, maybe the City needs to form a new
policy, he thought. Mr. Muller said that Council's previous action is
effectively removing any economic incentive to follow a historic
preservation ordinance. Mr. Obie said he does not have a problem
with funding repairs to the County Clerk's building but he feels that
e the County might be the one to do it.
Vote was taken on the motion which carried, Mr. Delay, Mr. Hamel,
Mr. Lieuallen, and Mrs. Smith voting aye, and Mr. Bradley and
Mr. Obie voting no.
Joan Rich, Historic Review Board, commented to Council that the
Board needs a new direction from the Council should it wish to change
some of the standards on funding historic preservation requests. It
was understood that the matter would be placed on a Wednesday Council
agenda.
C. Rezonings
(Maps have been distributed to Council members.)
1. From R-l to RG/SR property located at the southeast corner of
29th Place and Willamette (Johnson and Windisch) (Z 78-12)
Recommended by Planning Commission July 11, 1978.
Mr. Saul, Planner, noted that the area in question is about 16,000
square feet on which about 10 units could be erected if the rezoning
request were approved. There had been some concern expressed about
the traffic problem at the Planning Commission level. He said that
site review procedures were included in the Planning Commission
e
8/14/78--7
558
approval, to address the following concerns: compatibility with the
e surroundings; efficient, workable and safe interrelationships among
building, parking, circulation, open space, and landscaped areas;
structures designed, sized, and shaped in scale and harmony with
intended uses; and safe and efficient ingress, egress, and on-site
traffic circulation.
No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared
by Councilors.
Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of the record.
Public Hearing was opened.
Michael Gannon, 30th and Willamette, said the neighborhood is rapidly
becoming a ghetto, if the Council were to tour he thinks they would be
appalled at the nature of the use of the land. Zone changes are not
adequate to address the hazards of the higher density use for the
future of the city. He said it is clear from the broken glass and
lack of amenities that the City has taken steps to lead to a rapid
deterioration of the neighborhood.
Public hearing was closed.
C.B. 1733--Authorizing rezoning from R-l to RG/SR property located at
the southeast corner of 29th Place and Willamette Street
was read by council bill number and title only, there being
e no councilor present requesting that it be read in full.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings sup-
porting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff
notes and minutes of July 11, 1978, be adopted by reference
thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill
number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that
enactment be considered at this time.
Mr. Lieuallen expressed sympathy with the speaker. He hoped that
Council, at some future time, would look at the problem of creating
outside amenities in multi-family residential areas.
Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously, and
the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors
present voting aye, except Mr. Bradley voting no, the bill was
declared passed and numbered 18243.
2. From RA to R-2/PD property located west of Oak Patch Road and south
of Amazon Channel, east of Acorn ParkRoad (Ogle) (Z 78-13)
Recommended by Planning Commission July'il, 1978.
e
8/14/78--8
55~
Mr. Saul said rezoning is consistent with the City's adopted plan.
e It would allow continuation of a development to this property, which
has already been approved for the south portion.
No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared
by Councilors.
Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of the record.
Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
C.B. 1734--Authorizing rezoning from RA to R-2/PD property located
west of Oakpatch Road and south of Amazon Channel, east
of Acorn Park Road, was read by council bill number and
title only, there being no Councilor present requesting
that it be read in full.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings sup-
porting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission
staff notes and minutes of July 11, 1978, be adopted by
reference thereto, that the bill be read the second time
by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the
council, and that enactment be considered at this time.
Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second
time by council bill number only.
e Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bjll be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All
Councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed
and numbered 18244.
3. From R-l to R-2 property located north of 24th Avenue and
east of Willamette Street (Kohls)(Z 78-15)
Recommended by Planning Commission July 11, 1978.
Mr. Saul said the purpose is to allow making a residence
into a two-family unit. He said it is consistent with the
general plan.
No Councilors declared ex parte contacts or conflicts of
interest.
Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public
hearing was opened.
David Williams, 975 Oak, representing Dr. Polanski, said the appli-
cation had been for a change to RG. Public Works pointed out diffi-
culties, one because of potential access problems. He said this is
one lot away from a very busy intersection. The only available
parking does create a hazard of backing onto 24th Avenue. Public
Works also indicated the need for alley improvements. Mr. Williams
-
8/14/78--9
~O
does not think the residents want to pay for that. There is a pan-
- handle lot problem also. He said there has been no application made
for R-2 zoning, and he doesn't feel the Planning Commission has the
authority to change an application and grant something else.
Public hearing was closed.
Mr. Saul responded that he feels the zone change is consistent
with the general plan. On the issue of changing the recommendation to
R-2, it was found to be acceptable after review by the attorney's
office. It is a lesser zone change than RG, since RG is more intensive.
C.B. 1735--Authorizing rezoning from R-l to R-2 property located north
of 24th Avneue and east of Willamette Street was read by
council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor
present requesting that it be read in full.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings supporting
the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of July 11, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto, that
the bill be read the second time by council bill number only,
with the unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment
be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the
bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. BraQley, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors
e present voting aye, except Mr. Hamel and Mr. Bradley voting no,
the bill was declared passed and numbered 18245.
4. Rezoning from AGto R-l property located at 5101 Royal Avenue, Eugene
Haines-Jacobson Enterprises, Inc. (Z 78-16)
Recommended by Planning Commission July 11, 1978.
Mr. Saul said the property is suitable for low-density residential
development. It is one of the few remaining parcels in the Bethel-
Danebo area that has not been so zoned.
No Councilors indicated conflicts of interest or ex parte contacts.
Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record.
Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
Mr. Lieuallen left the meeting.
C.B. 1736--Authorizing rezoning from AG to R-l property located at 5101
Royal Avenue was read by number and title only, there being
no Councilor present requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that findings supporting
the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
e
8/14/78--10
5"
minutes of July 11, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto, that
e the bill be read the second time by council bill number only,
with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be
considered at this time.
The motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second
time by council bill number only.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18246.
D. Liquor License New Outlet: Concha's, 2777 Friendly Street (R)
Applicant: Theodore R. Kulongoski, 1209 Pearl Street
Manager said there were two objectors, three non-objectors, and
a few with no commitment. He said all papers are in order and
staff recommends approval.
Public hearing was opened.
Marian Phelan, 1820 West 29th, said that the restaurant is applying
for a beer and wine license only. Hours of operation are 11 a.m. to
11 p.m.
Public hearing was closed.
- Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to recommend approval
and forward to OLCC. Motion carried unanimously.
E. Public Works Bid Awards
Bids have been distributed to Council members (opened 8/8/78 10 a.m.)
Don Gilman, Assistant Public Works Director, reviewed the bids for
Council. He recommended awarding to low bidders on all six projects.
Public hearing was opened.
Isaac Tevet, 3685 Bardell, questioned the cost of the project to him
as a property owner. He said it will be $6,100. He finds it to be a
little excessive, at least for 95 feet of property. He said he
presently pays for a sanitary sewer on the corner that he is not even
connected to as yet. He also understands the systems development tax
will not be used for this development at all. He said his neighbors
also object to the high cost on the project.
Robert J. Wasson, 580 Lindley Lane, said he is in favor of the
improvement, but against the proposed cost.
Public hearing was closed.
e Bert Teitzel, Public Works, commented that if Council wants to defer
the assessment for those people not connected to the sanitary sewer as
yet, that would be possible. It will be three or four years before
the line is connected.
5t~ 8/14/78--11
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to accept the
low bid on all projects but that, on Project 5, the people
e who are not as yet hooked up to the sewer will be eligible
for a deferred assessment. Motion carried, all Council
members voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining on Project 3
and voting no on Project 5.
III. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING
C.B. 1737--Repealing Ordinance No. 18216, adopting the City budget, .
making appropriations, determining and levying the annual
tax for the annual tax for the City of Eugene for the
fiscal year beginning July 1, 1978, and ending June 30, 1979,
and declaring an emergency, was read by number and title
only, there being no Council member present requesting that
it be read in full.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be
read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous
consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at
this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read
the second time by number and title only.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be
approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. Mo t ion
carried unanimously and the bill was declared passed and
numbered 18247.
-
- IV. RESOLUTIONS
Res. No. 2983--Authorizing payment of bills, claims, and progress
payments for period July 24 to August 14, 1978, was
read by number and title.
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to adopt the reso-
lution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, to approve Council
minutes of July 24, 1978. Roll call vote. Motion carried
unanimously.
On motion duly made, seconded, and passed, the meeting was adjourned to
August 16, 1978.
~H2A-
Ci ty Manager
CTH:DP:pm/CM8bI3
.
8/14/78--12
5'3
.
.
e DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Engineering Division
Bid No. 10
Opened August 8, 1978
1 . PAVING, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND PEDESTRIAN WAY
Within and adjacent to Kee~ton Terrace Subdivision (Job No. 1435)
Contract Cost
Bidders: Basic Alternate
AWARD 1. H & J Construction----------------____________~______$ 0 $ 33.792.00
2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc~~~~~-----------------------, 0 33,992.39
3. 1 34,692.50
Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.----------------...-------:. 35,751.50 '-
4. Shur-Way Contractors, ,Inc..---------------------------~, 35,657.70 0
5. Wildish Construction Co.----------------------------- 42,686.63 0
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
Paving $1.,600. DO/Lot
San. Lateral 1,020.00/Lot
San. Service 340.00/Lot
Storm Sewer 500.00/Lot $ 3,200.00 $ 1,800.00
Ped.Way 230..00/Lot
Storm Sewer - School District 4J - $8,200.00
e COMPLETION DATE: October 6, 1978
--------~---------------------------.-----------------------~---------------------------------------
2. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and
adjacent toCJH Estates Subdivision and Alban-Tate
Subdivision (Jab No. 1298 and 1493)
Contract Cost
Bidders: Basic Alternate
AWARD 1.. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----.:.----------------$ 52,239.50 $ 50,597.00
2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------------- 0 51,301.80
3. Wildish Construction C04-----------------.--------- 0 54,698.82
4. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------------------- 59,426.50 0
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
Paving $ 26.60/FF None 0
San. Lateral 0.121/SF
San. Service 235.00/Lot
Storm Se\'ier 330.00/Lot
Pede \~ay l20.00/Lot
e COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1978
Page 1 of 3
5~'t
.
.
.
3. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within Commerce e
West Business Park; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet
of the West Boundary of Commerce West Business Park (Job No. 1444)
Bidders Contract Cost
AWARD 1- H & J Construction---____________________________________-___~ $ 100,788;16
2. Babb Construction Co., dba Delta Construction Co.------------- 101.119.16
3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.------------_____________________ 103,555.50 .
4. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------_______________________ 104,270.00
5. Wildish Construction Co.-------------_________________________ 106,582.38 ,
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount BUdgeted
.,..
441 Paving $ 37.50/FF - $5,320/Lot
San. lateral $1,650.00/Lot
San. Service 280.00/Lot
Storm Sewer 750.00/Lot . Storm $1,700 0
COMPLETION DATE: October 16, 1978
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~---
4s PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER in Garden Meadows
Subdivision; and paving Crescent Avenue from West Bounda.-:y e
of Garden Meadows Subdivision to 300 feet West (Jab No. 1542)
Contract Cost
Bidders Basic Alternate
WARD 1. Wildish Construction CO.-----------________________$ 0 $ 85,282.97
2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------____________ 0 ?6,380.08
3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.----------------------$91,119.55 87,418.55
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
Paving $ 27.63/FF or $2,700/Lot $ 47,000.00 $ 35,400.00
San. Lateral 775/Lot
San. Service 245/Lot
COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1978
. ,
Page 2 of 3
-
S~S
.~,~...,~,....""""~-,.,.: ...,-..,.,.-~~"......-"".~~""'~_.:--..~~~~.......,~,."""'-'''''~_:_:.~....''t:''\.:"':.,.1"'.;~\..~..,}~.".~~....."_"...,...,,..~'.~~......__...__.. -----_._~_.-
.
~
5. PAVING AND SANITARY SEWER on Lindley Lane from Bardell
Avenue to 200 feet North (Job No. 1495) .. Contract Cost
_ BIDDER: Basic Alternate
I\WARD 1. Shur-Way Contractor, Inc.-----------------__________$ 23,011.25 0
2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.------------------_____ 26,903.00 $ 25,9.51.00
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City. Amount Budgeted
Paving $ 29.92/FF '0 0
5" Concrete 2.52/SF
San. Lateral O.17/SF
San. Service 880.00/Lot
Overwidth - N. W. Pipeline $4,050
COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1978 .~
------------,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. PAVING on Jessen Drive from Highway 99 (N) to 200 feet North
(Job No. 1064)
Contract Cost
Bidder: Basic Alternate
AWARD 1. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-------~--------------$ 91,570.25 $ 83,687.75
- 2. Wildish Construction Co.---------------------______ 0 .85,327.44
3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.~-----------------------_ 0 86,138.40
- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
28' Paving $ 26.50/FF $ 12,000.00 0
361 Paving ~RA~ 31.86/FF
36' Paving C2 34.43/FF
5" Concrete 1.87/SF
COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1978
I -------------------------------------------------------------------------~-----------------~---
7 PAVING Overlay on Coburg Road from Ca1 Young Road to Be1t1ine
Road (Job No. 1639) .
Bidder: Contract Cost
~WARD 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------------________~$ 60,460.00
- 2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.--------~-----------------______ () I ,u~u.ou
3. Wi1dish Construction Co.-----------------------------________ 70,458.00
Cost to City Amount Budgeted
COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1978 $ 60,460.00 $ ~0,460.00
e Page 3 of 3
5~'
,..,..~_...."~_~".,.~.,..,:"..,.:.,':'C;;f'.;:c<'--"".. .~"'f,.n.._..,.....~,~,~...-.'''''.' ...,. ""_'~'_'_.-' .....I":~_; .....,..'...-..,.'..".,.. \ "~'_'~~""""~~"__~","", ~'''~.,_,.,.:''''...'''"''''~_.=.__.....,'"''~,.,..~..._.,...,___._.____._