Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/14/1979 Meeting e MINUTES EUGENE CITY COUNCIL May 14, 1979 Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 7:30 p.m., Council Chambers, May 14, 1979, with the following Councilors present: Jack Delay, D. W. Hamel, Eric Haws, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, Gretchen Miller, and Emily Schue. Betty Smith was absent. I. Agenda Addition--SB 472 (Memorandum Distributed) Manager asked for a motion to consider the City's strategies in dealing with SB 472. He explained that the grass seed growers and the Legisla- ture, in enacting SB 472, have refused to take responsibility for air quality in the Willamette Valley and the City sees no alternative but to seek legal remedies. - Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Haws, to amend the agenda to consider SB 472 and its consequences. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Long explained that 5B 472 applies not to this year's burning, but to next year's burn, and sets the acreage limit at 250,000. The City opposed this bill and they were almost successful. The alternatives open to the City now are several: First would be involvement in the admini- strative process of the Environmental Protection Agency wherein there is a request by the State of Oregon to go from the present limitation of 50,000 acres to 180,000 acres. The City would, if the motion passed, intervene directly in that matter and attempt to defeat the amendment to the State Implementation Plan. That would make the limitation 50,000 acres. Second would be, with the Council's authority, to develop some possible issues to present to Federal Court in the form of a declaratory judgment or some similar proceeding. Finally, the City could assist the State and Federal governments in enforcing the limitation ultimately established for this and for next year. Mayor expressed his frustration at the Legislative hearing. People who testified seemed to feel that Eugene had done nothing about air pollution. He asked the Council to take a strong position. He said that Eugene will suffer economically because of the impact on growing businesses and industries. The grass seed growers refused to compro- mise. He lauded the fine work of the legislators who supported the City. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the Council instruct staff to pursue whatever remedies are or may be available to the City in this matter. Motion carried unanimously. e ZS6 5/14/79--1 II. Public Hearings A. Consideration of Jetboats on Willamette River Issue (Materials Dis- tributed)--Manager noted the City had received a petition and a large amount of correspondence asking the City Council take an active role in this matter. The Planning staff has done preliminary research on how to go about this. It will require a lot of legal research and staff time. Who has control over the river and its banks seems to be something that needs clarifying. e Public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor of the jetboats on the Willamette River was: Roger Eugene Lefler, PO Box 389, Rogue River, owner of the jetboat operation; he said he would answer any questions. Those speaking against the jetboats on the Willamette River were: Ka, Robinhold, 4450 Hilyard; Fred Mohr, 2662 Alder; Louis Osternig, 79 Fair Oaks; Terry McCabe, 1717 Carmel; John McCaffrey, 414 East 15th Avenue; Peter M. Patricelli, MD, 2385 Madrona; Michael Piper, 2682 Potter; Steve Gilbert, 1260 Fairview; Richard Bappe, 1172 West 5th Avenue; Ron McMullan, 1420 East Briarcliff Lane; and George Gary, 1970 Grant. Those who testified against the jetboats on the Willamette River did not like the noise of the 40-passenger vehicle. They were concerned ~ about safety for canoeists, fishermen, and waders. Fishermen asked ~ why an environmental impact statement had not been required. Citing a New Zealand study of 40-percent mortality to salmon eggs when jetboats stir the spawning beds, they asked why the Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission was not concerned. One suggestion was to declare a "quiet zone" from the Ferry Street Bridge to Beltline Bridge. They noted that this was a beautiful, safe stretch of river unique for being a safe place for people to canoe and raft. They asked why an impact statement was not asked for by the Army Corp of Engineers before the dock was built. Two studies were cited: One concerned the phasing out of motorized traffic on the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon. The other concerned the monitoring by the BLM of conflicts between motorized and non-motorized vehicles on the Rogue River. The cost of regulation of motorized boats on the Willamette River was another concern of those who testified. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to defer action to a less crowded agenda in order to provide the Council more time to consider the matter. 5/14/79--2 e 251 - Ms. Schue asked for more information. She wondered how much authority the City had in this matter. Mr. Lieuallen asked the staff to research the question of jurisdiction. He said the "quiet zone" had a great appeal to him, and asked if that would be legally possible. Mr. Long said that the question of jurisdiction was a tangle and would take a long time to unravel. Did the Council want to pursue it? Ms. Miller noted that this is an issue of the City, County (the boat dock is on an easement owned by the County), the State Marine Board, the State Department of Environmental Quality, and the Corp of Engineers. It was hoped that action could be taken in a few weeks as they get more information. Manager noted that the intent of the motion was that, in perhaps a month, staff would come back with preliminary answers, an estimate of what might be involved, and the best way to pursue the matter. Vote was taken on the motion which carried unanimously. B. Rezoning From RA to R-2 propertf Located West of Oak Patch Road On North Side of West 15th Avenue Polioudakis) (Z 79-3) (Map Distri- buted)--Unanimously recommended by the Planning Commission on April 3, 1979. - Mr. Saul said that this rezoning involves 9,780 square feet presently developed as a single-family residence. The property could be devel- oped to a maximum of three units under the proposed zone change. Almost all the property surrounding this one is already zoned R-2. Since 1967, there have been ten zone changes to R-2 along Oak Patch Road between 18th and 11th. The findings of the Planning Commission recommend this zone change on the grounds of consistency with the General Plan, the issue of public need, and the other applicable standards. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by the Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was held, with no testimony presented. CB 1885--Authorizing rezoning from RA to R-2 property located west of Oak Patch Road on the north side of West 15th Avenue was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the findings sup- porting the rezoning, as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of April 3, 1979, be adopted by reference - 2~ 5/14/79--3 thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that .... enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unani- ~ mously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18392. c. Rezoning From RA to R-2 Property Located at the Southeast Corner of 9th Avenue and Hayes Street (Booth) (Z 79-4) (Map Distributed)--Unani- mously recommended by the Planning Commission on April 13, 1979. Mr. Saul said that this involves 8,750 square feet and is vacant at this time. Under the existing zoning, the property could be developed as a duplex; under the proposed zoning, it could be developed as a tri-plex. This is a small area of the city where the Planning Commis- sion and the City Council have been attempting to encourage residential development over the past several years. The commitment of funds for improvement of the park located just south of this area, as well as the denial of several zone changes that would have resulted in conver- sion of residential property to non-residential use, are indications of this encouragement. One of the denials was for this property for a conversion to C-1. No exparte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. e Public hearing was held, with no testimony presented. CB 18B6--Authorizing rezoning from RA to R-2 property located at the southeast corner of 9th Avenue and Hayes Street was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of April 3, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18393. 5/14/79--4 e ~5~ - e e -'-------~,.;- -~, D. Garbage Rate Increase Request (Materials Distributedl--Manager said this matter had been discussed at previous Council meetings. The matter had been reviewed and studied by the Garbage Board. The recommended increase amounts to 6.9 percent. The last increase was March 1, 1978. This increase would become effective June 1, 1979. In the agreement, there was a provision that the haulers would abide by financial accounting procedures worked out by the Finance Department. Public hearing was held, with no testimony presented. Res. No. 3140--Concerning customer rates for garbage collection and authorizing an increase was read by number and title. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the resolution. Mr. Hamel asked if there could be consideration given to having the garbage haulers act independently so that, if they increase their fees, citizens would have the option of changing garbage haulers. Manager said that it had been considered and rate cutting was a concern. The idea that one or two garbage haulers might emerge on top was undesirable; however, it could be considered. Motion carried, all Councilors present voting aye except Mr. Haws voting no. E. for Somerset Mr. Saul said that this appeal is a challenge to the preliminary approval of Phases 5, 6, and 7 of Somerset Hills PUD, granted April 6, 1979. The appeal challenges only one aspect of the approval; that is, the location of a driveway into a parking lot that is part of the development. The appeal alleges that cars exiting from the driveway at night onto Timberline shine their lights into the appellant's home and that the problem could be eliminated by moving the driveway further to the north. No exparte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council ors. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was opened. Michael Dooley, 2641 Woodstone Place, landscape architect, noted that he had submitted materials to the Council that explained his position. He said the driveway was a 14-percent grade and lights on high beam from cars would shine in his house. He explained his desire to have the driveway moved further to the north. 5/14/79--5 260 ,""""""- " Dick Unruh, Moreland, Unruh & Smith, Architects, noted that the Council had before them answers to Mr. Dooley's appeal. He referred .... to the untimeliness of the appeal, saying that Mr. Dooley could have ~ appealed the PUD at the diagrammatic phase of the PUD. He noted that entering traffic was not a problem, nor was daytime traffic. He felt that Mr. Dooley's planned road was unworkable. He differed with Mr. Dooley.s findings concerning headlights, saying that low beam lights do not reach Mr. Dooley's home. Mr. Dooley felt that he was asking for a minor change. He disagreed with the unworkable aspect of the suggested road change. He, again, disagreed that lights would not reach his home. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Mr. Obie asked about putting a sign asking that lights be lowered. Mr. Saul replied that it was not in the Council's interest to set that kind of condition which would be very difficult to enforce through the years as it would be on private property. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to deny the appeal. Motion carried, all Council members voting aye, except Mr. Haws voting no. F. Appeal of Planning Commission Action Re: Code Violation Regarding Austin B. Petersen, dba Austin 1-Sto Plumbin Located at 2228 Olive Street CV 79-1 Map Distributed --Manager noted this Zoning Code violation related to the storage of commercial materials and parking of commercial vehicles at a residence. The matter was brought before ~ the Planning Commissfon on two occasions: One when the Petersens were .. unable to attend; the second on March 6, 1979, when the Planning Commission ruled that there was a violation after testimony from the neighborhood. The Planning Commission ordered the storage terminated at this location. The violator could then appeal, followed up by a statement of appeal, stating the reasons. This statement of reasons for appeal has not been received by the City. It is within the authority of the Council to dismiss the appeal. Mr. Saul asked that the Council, as a preliminary matter, decide if it wished to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the requirements of the City Code for conduct of an appeal had not been met. Mr. Long stated that, in the past, the position of the Council has been that it will not hear an appeal when the requirements of the Code have not been complied with, and the omissions are serious. The applicant was twice told, once by letter and once in person, that they must file a statement setting forth their reasons for the appeal. The Council may dismiss this appeal. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Delay, to dismiss the appeal. The motion carried unanimously. 5/14/79--6~ 2&1 e G. New Liquor License Outlets 1. La Nouba, 380 West 13th Avenue (RMB/PS) (Richard Fulwiler, Donald Marsh) Manager noted that there had been objectors in the neighborhood. The lack of parking is a problem. Public Works has noted that on-site parking has not been provided and would be required at a ratio of one space per 60 square feet of building area. There is controversy concerning this application, and there is a parking problem. e Public hearing was opened. Those speaking against the proposed liquor license were: John C. Furney, 347 West 13th Avenue, submitted a petition of 15 names. He was also representing John & Jill's Market. He and the petitioners objected because of inadequate parking, live entertain- ment, intoxicated drivers, and the possibility of danger to the area stores and homes. He did not object to having a deli in the neighborhood. Dale Berg, 397 West 13th Avenue, said that he looked forward to the deli, but did not like this approval because there was not adequate parking. His establishment did not want to provide that parki ng. Chester Pietka, 372 West 12th Avenue, also objected to approval because of inadequate parking. He liked the idea of having a deli; he was concerned about noise at the house next door. Those speaking in favor of the proposed liquor license were: Don Marsh, 380 West 13th Avenue, partner in this establishment, admitted parking was a problem. There was parking at Berg's Ski Shop and at Pietka's. They would have parking at the Wagon Wheel. The nature of the clientele would be in and out. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Manager said that Mr. Allen advised that if they do not have parking on the site, they are allowed to have parking within 400 feet of the site. His department would not issue a permit unless there was sufficient parking space (one per 60 square feet). Mr.. Marsh said that he understood it was related to the seating spacE~. Manager thought nine spaces; Mr. Marsh thought three to four spaces were necessary. - Mr. Obie said the issue was selling beer and wine on the premises. Mr. Haws asked the criteria for issuing a liquor license and wondered if parking was one of them. 2'2 5/14/79--7 Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to forward the recommen- dation for approval, subject to conditions. The motion carried unanimously. - 2. Valley River Union, 1125 Valley River Drive, (PS) (William Larson) Manager said this request was from a gas station that said that they would be selling other foods, too. The application was in order. Public hearing was opened, there being no testimony. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to forward recommendation for approval, subject to conditions. Motion carried, all Councilors voting aye, except. Mr. Obie voting no. H. Public Works Bid Awards (Attached; Opened May 8, 1979, 10 a.m.)--Manager noted that there were 11 different bid awards. Mr. Allen suggested the approval of the low bids on each item, except 6 and 10. Number 6 was initially approved by 54 percent of the property owners. Since that date, one of the property owners withdrew, reducing the petition to 35 percent. The developer adjacent to the street indicated that there is a contractual agreement that makes one property go along with approving the street. That would put the percentage to 50. The City does not become the banker on this project. On the paving of Broadmoor, Item 10, $37.60 per front foot is the price of this project. The project was proposed in 1969, and cost ~ $10.00 per front foot at that time. It was rejected by the property owners. Public hearing was opened on the paving in Project 6. Those speaking in favor of the project were: Floyd Wilkes, 2310 Tabor Street, the original developer of property, said that 50 percent of the property owners are obligated to participate according to an agreement which covers all property in Wilkes Plat and an adjoining piece of property on the same side of the street, Which had an agreement with the then owner of the property. Larry Jackson, 1373 Bond Lane, said that his name had been removed from the petition. Public Works told him that he could remove his name. He asked that the contract not be awarded. He said that he was not against the development, but against the way it was handled. 5/14/79--8 e U3 e Mrs. Robert Self, 1395 Bond Lane, did not like the way this was handled. She understood that the City required 50 percent of the property owners to request the street improvement. She did not understand why they should pay for a road that was necessary for the developer to develop his land. Public hearing was opened on the paving for Project 10. Speaking in favor of the project was: Peter Ogan, 2096 Broadview, representing three families on Broadview, objected to the dust and dirt in the summer, and mud in the winter. He felt that, as a taxpayer, it was not unreasonable to ask for an improved street. Speaking against the project were: Kathleen Springate, 2095 Broadview, who objected to the street improve- ment on the grounds that the street was adequate and that they would be assessed $7,500. She said they would have to close off one of their driveways because the street height would make the driveway unusable. She said that 52 percent of the land along the street was owned by people who did not want the improvement. - Paul Hobo, 2090 Broadview, stated that his street is paved and he is happy with it. He did not want to pay $2,700 to repave the stree~. The height and width of the street design were not to his liking, and did not fit in with what is now there. He urged the City to start at the Springate's driveway and to make a short street. Public hearing was closed on Items 6 and 10, there being no further testimony. Mr. Allen, commenting on the Bradley Street project, said that the City Council respects the right of an individual to withdraw their name. That has nothing to do with the process. The contract would mean that the City was within their rights to assess the property owners. We would still recommend that project on the condition that the developer is responsible for the deferred assessments. Mr. Allen, commenting on Item 10, Broadview, said that the comments were similar to the ones in 1969. One curb would be higher than the other for drainage, no storm sewer being added. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to award low bids as recommended, with the conditions set forth by Mr. Allen on Item 6 concerning street dedication, and the deferred assessments. Motion carried, all Councilors present voting aye, except Ms. Miller voting no. - 5/14/79--9 2~ III. Ordinance for Second Reading CB 1878--Regarding land development; amending Section 7.279 of the Eugene ~ Code, 1971, and declaring an emergency was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. Motion carried, all Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Haws and Ms. Miller voting no, and Mr. Obie abstaining. IV. Ordinances for First Reading CB 1887--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within Plum Tree Subdivision; and paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within Janisse Subdivision and storm sewer within 160 feet of the east boundary of Janisse Subdivision extended north to the Amazon Channel (1453, 1457) (78-10, 78-11) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1888--Levying assessments for the sanitary sewer to serve Essex Heights Subdivision (1462) (78-30) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. - Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1889--Levying assessments for paving on Hawkins Lane from Highland Oaks Boulevard to 250 feet south of 25th Avenue; and on 25th Avenue from 500 feet west of Hawkins Lane to Hawkins Lane (1487) (78-34) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. 5/14/79--10 ~ U5 - CB 1890--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within Commerce West Business Park; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the west boundary of Commerce West Business Park (1444) (78-44) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1891--Levying assessments for storm sewer between Echo Hollow and Ellsworth Street from the Marshall Ditch to Royal Avenue (1155) (78-63) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. - CB 1892--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, storm ~ewer, and pedestrian way within and adjacent to Skywood Subdivision (1458) (78-16) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1893--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer to serve Lincoln Crest Subdivision and paving on Lincoln Street from 31st Avenue to Crest Drive (1421) (78-21) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1894--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within and adjacent to Leo & Betty Davis Subdivision; sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the north, south, and east boundaries of e 2~b 5/14/79---11 Leo & Betty Davis Subdivision; and paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within Linmar Subdivision and sanitary sewer within ~ 160 feet of the east margin of Linmar Subdivision (1396, 1464) ~ (78-24) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1895--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within South Vista Subdivision; and to serve Anne Plat; and sanitary sewer to serve within 160 feet of the north and south boundary of Anne Plat (1423, 1440) (78-33) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it b~ read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1896--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer to serve Weiger Park Subdivision (1517) (78-38) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. e CB 1897--Levying assessments for a storm sewer in Dillard Road from 43rd Avenue to 300 feet southeast of 43rd Avenue; and 100 feet to 300 feet south of 43rd from Dillard Road to 800 feet east (1618) (78-57) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. . 5/14/79--12 ~ Z~7 e CB 1898--Levying assessments for sanitary sewer to serve Tax Lots 18-03-17-10-4801 and 4805 adjacent to East 43rd Avenue (1589) (78-61) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimously. CB 1899--Levying assessments for a sanitary sewer in Gilham Road from Kidder Subdivision south to existing sanitary sewer (1534) (78-66) was read by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member present requesting it be read in full. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the first time and be referred to Hearings Panel for hearing May 21, 1979, with Panel recommendations to be brought back for Council consideration and final reading May 29, 1979. The motion carried unanimousl y. v. Resolutions ,- Res. No. 3141--Authorizing payment of bills, claims, and progress payments for period April 23 through May 14, 1979, was read by number and ti tl e. Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously. VI. Approval of Minutes Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve Council minutes of April 9, 1979, and April 23, 1979. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Request for Future Agenda Item Mr. Delay asked if the Hearings Panel process for the assessments could be considered on a future agenda. He questioned the time they had spent on thi s i tern, sayi ng that it was simi 1 ar to the time they spend on other hearings panels. Mayor asked the Manager to put the public bids process on an agenda. - UP~ made, seconded, Charles T. HenrY~~ City Manager (Recorded by Beth Conant) BC:so/CM8a1 and passed, the meeting adjourned to May 16, 1979. 2t;8 5/14/79--13 e AWARD - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division 1. PAVING. SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent to Canyon View Estates Subdivision. (Job $1569) Bid No. 3 Opened: May 8. 1979 Contract Cost Bidders: 1~ Morse Bros..Inc.---------------------$ 2. H & J Construction-------------------$ 3. Eugene Sand & Grave1.Inc.------------$ 4. Shur-Way Contractors,Inc.------------$ 5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor,Inc.--------$ 6. Wildish Construction Co.-------------$ Basic 98,763.84 92.427.15 -0- 97,367.40 99,531. 75 -0- Alternate $ 89,498.62 $ -0- $ 96.503.70 $ -0- $ 111,492.25 $ 104,864.70 Amount Budgeted None 'y:. -----------------------------------------------------------------_._------------------------------- e 2. AWARD Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City None Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate 1. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------$J43.988.85 $ -0- 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------$ -0- $ 246,526.95 3. Wi1dish Construction Co.--------------$ -0- $ 250,176.75 4. Dan.D. Allsup Contractor,Inc.---------$ 278,035.30 $ 255,189.95 5. Morse Bros., Inc.---------------------$ -0- $ 256,446.10 6. H & J Construction--------------------$ 275,876.75 $ -0- 26'1 Amount Budgeted $ 17,500.00 e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 281 Paving, San.Lateral San.Service Storm Sewer 5" Concrete $ 33.20/FF $ 1.140/Lot $ 640/Lot $ 1,420/Lot $ 2.10/Lot COMPLETION DATE: August 1, 1979 PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within Kiska Subdivision; sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the east margin of Kiska Subdivision; paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer within Kukui Hill Subdivision; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the east and south margins of Kukui Hill Subdivision (Job Nos. 1547 & 1549) Cost to Abutting Property 281 PaVing $ 33.00/FF 361 Paving $ 40.60/FF San.latera1 $ 0.17/SF San.Service $ 500/Each StormSewer $ 1,130/Lot COMPLETION DATE: September 1. 1979 Cost to City $ 19,500.00 3. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent to Nolan Industrial Park (Job #1611) Page 2 e Bidders: Contract Cost Basic Alternate AWARD 1. Wildish Construction Co.----------$ -0- 2. Morse Bros., Inc.-----------------$ 186,183.60 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------$ -0- 4. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----$ -0- 5. H & J Construction----------------$ 178,438.10 Cost to Abutting Property: Cost to City $ 4,700.00 441 Paving San.Lat. San.Service $ 37.30/FF $ 0.06/SF $ 430/Each COMPLETION DATE: August 1, 1979 $ 165.885.65 $ 1"68,483.67 $ 169,347.51 $ 177,645.05 $ -0- Amount Budgeted $ 6,800.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . ''t~ 4. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent to Maracott Manor; and storm sewer construction from east pl~t boundary to 270 feet east (Job #1585) Bidders: Contract Cost Basic Alternate e AWARD 1. H & J Construction------------------$ 27,188.00 2. Shur-Way Contractors,Inc.-----------$ 27,635.50 3. Morse Bros., Inc.-------------------$ 29,443.25 4. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.----------$ -0- 5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.------$ 35,084.90 Cost to Abutting Property 281 Paving $ 1,450/Lot San.Serv. $ 1,100/Lot StormSwr. $ 1,820/Lot Cost to City None COMPLETION DATE: August 1, 1979 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- $ 31,375.65 $ 35,845.40 Amount Budgeted None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2..10 e e 5. AWARD e 6. AWARD PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER to serve White Oak Heights Subdivision; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the west boundary of White Oak Heights (JOb #1608) Bidders: Contract Cost Basic Alternate 1. Morse Bros., Inc.--------------------$ 98~928.25 2. H & J Construction-------------------$ 102,613.31 3. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 105,013.97 4. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.-------$ -0- 5. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----------$ -0- 6. Wildish Construction Co.-------------$ -0- Cost to Abutting Property $ 99,481.00 $ -0- $ -0- $ 108,373.91 $ 117,990.10 $ 121,076.85 28' Paving San. Lat. San.Serv. Storm Swr. None Cost to City Amount Budgeted None $ 2,470/Lot $ 1,770/Lot $: 210/Lot $ 700/lot COMPLETION DATE: August 1, 1979 PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER in Bradley Drive adjacent to Wilkes Plat from 450 feet north of Bond lane to Bond lane; and storm sewer construction within Wilkes Plat. (JOb #1472) . 'v- Bidders Contract Cost Basic Alternate 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----------$ 27~460.40 2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc. -----------$ -"27,781. 05 3. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.-------$ -0- 4. Wildish Construction Co.-------------$ 29,333.35 5. H & J Construction-------------------$ 31,567.90 6. Egge Sand & Gravel Co.---------------$ 32,120.00 7. Morse Bros., Inc.--------------------$ 34,264.50 Cost to Abutting Property $ 27,858.90 $ -0- $ 28,680.20 $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- $ -0- 28' Paving San.Swr.lat. San.Swr.Serv. $ 30.20/FF $ 0.15/SF $ 410/lot None Cost to City Amount Budgeted None COMPLETION DATE: August 17, 1979 Page 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~ 21/ Page 4 7. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND PEDESTRIAN WAY to serve Anton Subdivision and Amber Subdivision and sanitary sewer construction within 160 feet of the east boundary of Anton Subdivision; and paving, sanitary sewer and storm sewer construction within Kerrick Subdivision and sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the north boundary of Kerrick Subdivision. (Job Nos. 1335, 1654, 1601) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate e AWARD 1. Morse Bros., Inc.-------------------$ 182,948.50 2. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.------$ -0- 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.----------$ -0- 4. H & J Construction------------------$ 199,604.65 5. Wildish Construction Co.------------$, -0- $ .176,433~60 $ 180,903.60 $ 186,005.55 $ -0- $ 219,446.63 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted 281 Paving San.Swr.Lat. San.Swr.Serv. Storm Sewer Ped.Way. $ 22.30/FF $ O.ll/SF $ 255/lot $ 310/Lot $ 40/Lot None None ,. COMPLETION DATE: September 1,1979 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. SANITARY SEWER to serve Banyan Subdivision and sanitary sewer construction 350 feet south of Ca1 Young Road from Hammock Street to 240 feet east. (Job #1581) Bi dders: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----------$ 9,089.00 2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 10,603.50 3. H & J Construction-------------------$ 12,053.00 4. Wildish Construction Co.-------------$ 13,003.00 5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.-------$ 14,489.00 , Cost to Abutting Property San.Swr.Lateral $0.25/SF San.Swr.Service $40/Each Cost to City None Amount Budgeted None COMPLETION DATE: July 13, 1979 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -. 2..12. ,. 9. SANITARY SEWER to serve Coast Hills ~ Vista Subdivision. (Job #1551) Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Dan D. Allsup Contractor,Inc.--------$ 11,217.65 2. Shur-Way Contractor,Inc.-------------$ 11,860.77 3. Wildish Construction Co.-------------$ 12,137.70 4. H & J Construction-------------------$ 12,683.50 5. Eugene Sand & Gravel,Inc.------------$ 13,412.00 Page 5 Cost to City Amount Budgeted None None Cost to Abutting Property San.Sewerlateral $ 3,565/lot San. SewerServ1 ce $ 25/Lot COMPLETION DATE: July 20, 1979 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. PAVING Broadview Street from Hawkins Heights Boulevard to Sunrise Boulevard. (JOb #440) Bidders: Contract Cost Basic A1te~ate AWARD 1. Egge Sand & Gravel Co.---------------$ 27,079.00 2. Wild1sh Construction Co.-------------$ -0- 3, Morse Bros.,Inc.---------------------$ 31,776.00 4. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----------$ -0- _)(1&1 Cost to Abutting Property 281 Paving $ 37.60/FF 211 A.C. Driveway $ 0.45/SF 511 Concrete $ 2.20/SF Cost to City None COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1979 $ -0- $ 27,629.05 $ -0- $ 33,009.50 Amount Budgeted None -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. SIDEWALK on east side of Bailey Hill Road from Westleigh Street to Warren Avenue; and on Warren Avenue from Bailey Hill Road to Timberline Dri~e; and on Timberline Drive from Warren Avenue to Wilshire Lane. (Job #1224) Bidder: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Walts Concrete Co.-------------------$ 9,227.50 2. H & J Construction-------------------$ 9,248.75 3. Morse Bros., Inc.--------------------$ 10,405.00 4. Eugene Sand & Gravel,Inc.-.----------$ 13,473.00 Cost to City Amount Budgeted -~ Cost to Abutting Property Sidewalk $ 2.15/SF COMPLETION DATE: July 15, 1979 $ 5,700.00 $ 5,100.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- 273