Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08/13/1979 Meeting , e MINUTES EUGENE CITY COUNCIL August 13, 1979 Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order August 13, 1979, 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller, with the following Councilors present: Betty Smith, D. W. Hamel, Eric Haws, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, Gretchen Miller and Emily Schue. Councilor Jack Delay was absent. 1. APPOINTMENTS--LANE COUNTY EMPLOYMENT TRAINING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to approve the appointments of Vivian Frelix-Hart and Mary Alice Brown to the ETAC Committee. When Ms. Miller asked if there were other applications, the Mayor apolo- gized for the haste with which only these two appointments were brought before the Council. Ms. Smith said that ETAC will be meeting tomorrow to review the City of Eugene's projects for further funding by CETA. Since there had recently e been two resignations, it was felt that Eugene ought to be fully represented. The positions had been advertised and these were the two people best quali- fied to fill the categories of minority and non~profit. Ms. Brown is a member of Harmony House and a secretary with LINK. Ms. Frelix-Hart is a member of the Minority Commission. To Mr. Lieuallen's question as to what committee approved the names of the appointments, the Mayor replied that he and staff, along with Ms. Smith, had selected the names. Mr. Lieuallen expressed surprise at this appoint- ment process. Ms. Smith replied that the selections had been going on since the resignation of Liz Heath three or four weeks ago. Ms. Miller did not have trouble with these particular appointments, but in the future would feel more comfortable with being able to scan all of the applications. She did not want to see this type of selection procedure become general po 1 icy. The motion to appoint carried unanimously. Noting that next year's CETA program will not have as many funds as it did this year, Ms. Smith told the Councilors that they could expect to be lobbied by agencies that may have positions cut. She asked Councilors to wait on any act,ion until the final ETAC report comes to the City Council. Mr. Lieuallen replied that he welcomed any input that could give him further information about CETA. - '1Z~ 8/13/79--1 - . Planning Department requested that Council consideration on the rezoning of property located within Willakenzie Island Area 2 be postponed until e September 12, 1979. Council agreed on the postponement. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Street Direction Change: 12th Avenue (Monroe and Polk Streets Access) (SC 79-4) (Information and Map Distributed) Manager explained this item was a question of street access. The City has gone through a period of testing. The Planning Commission, on a split vote, recommended denial of making the diverters permanent. The staff recommendation was to make them permanent. As prescribed by ordinance, the Manager issued an administrative memo to the Council recommending that the diverters become permanent. Manager referred to the administrative memo. Mr. Farah explained that the diverters were part of the Neighborhood Improvement Program, which has a goal of encouraging reinvestment in the neighborhood. The Westside Neighborhood Quality Project and the T-2000 Transportation Plan have included this concept. The purpose of the diverters is to reroute spillover traffic from arterial streets back to the arterial street. The intention is to get through traffic off 12th Avenue. Public hearing was opened. Listed below were those selected to speak for the group of 24 requesting ~ to be heard in favor of diverters. Mark Palmer, 1190 Monroe, asked the proponents to stand. He fe 1t the diverters enhanced the neighborhood. As a property owner. he felt that car traffic had been reduced. especially through traffic. It was now safer for children to move in the neighborhood and to go to school. He said in the past year. 12 students had been hit by or near Lincoln School by cars. He recognized the inconvenience to the neighborhood. He himself had to go out of his way four blocks to get to his house and he had lost two parking places. He recognized that there was an overflow into the alleyways, but this problem, he felt, could be solved. Ida Engels, 835 West 12th Avenue, said she lived on West 12th Avenue for 25 years. She would like the City to keep the traffic barrier there. Mark Miller. 790 West 12th Avenue. lived across from the traffic barrier. He illustrated on the map where he had acquired the signatures of people in favor of the West 12th diverter. On July 7, in four hours. 200 cyclists had passed and signed his petition. On July 8, for three hours, another 150 cyclists had signed the petition. On August 9, a week day, 160 signatures were obtained in a two-hour period. He said having the diverters affected many people in Eugene by encouraging bicycles, as well as reducing car traffic. e /.f3o 8/13/79--2 , Matthew Johnson, 1283 Tyler Street, takes 12th Avenue to work each day e and was glad that the diverters were there. His young son rides his bicycle on 12th Avenue and will be riding to Lincoln School. Jon Stafford, 1060 Madison, had been following this as a member of the Neighborhood Advisory Group and as Chairman of the Westside Neighbor- hood Group in 1976. He said this provides maximum benefit for minimum inconvenience. It reduces the traffic on 12th Avenue by 55 percent. This is part of a larger program and if this is not successful, the larger program will not continue. If these barriers are not made permanent, nothing else will be done with the neighborhood. Listed below were those speaking for the group opposed to the diverters. Bernice Willoughby, 1140 Adams, lives next to the alley. She said that since the diverter went in, the traffic has rerouted itself down the alley. When one problem is solved, another is created, she told the Council. Betty Williamson, 967 West 12th Avenue, has lived on 12th Avenue for 25 years. She said she pays taxes for. the street and does not under- stand why she cannot use the street. She said the traffic counters at Taylor, Van Buren, and Jackson showed that 300 cars were unaccounted for. However, the counter on Jefferson indicated the 300 cars had been accounted for there Those cars went down the alleys. After the diverters were installed, the number of cars that went down the alley e was 700. She was concerned that most of those cars were using the alleys. Another concern she expressed was that the fire engine could not pass the diverter. Roger Lesiak, 1260 Monroe, said the dust, vandalism, and speeding cars made living on the alley unpleasant. He asked why the bicycles could not use the Amazon Bikeway. Howard Warner, 1425 West 12th Avenue, felt there had always been very little traffic on 12th Avenue. He noted that several cars were going around the diverter. He suggested that permanent diverters would cut visibility. He asked the Council to remove the diverters because there was enough room for both bicycles and automobiles on 12th Avenue. Public hearing was closed. In response to a question, Mr. Farah said that the money for landscaped diverters would be available from the Community Development Block Grant. He directed additional questions to Public Works staff, Mr. Hanks and Mr. Hessler. Mr. Hanks, responding to the interpretation of the traffic counts (Ms. Williamson's testimony), suggested that the traffic counter was closer to the apartment complexes where the tenants could be using Polk to get to the arterial streets; east of Jefferson the traffic could be - going to Jefferson. He felt that the reduction of traffic was impres- sive and that the explanation could be that they were using 11th and 13th avenues. 4~ 8/13/79--3 Mr. Lieuallen, noting the concern for alley traffic, asked why and where these cars were going in the alleys. Mr. Hanks answered that the traffic count on the alleys north of 12th Avenue between Adams and e Monroe had 20-30 cars per day and the alleys south of 12th had 13-49 cars per day. He did not feel that was abnormally high. He did not have a destination study. Mr. Lieuallen responded that any traffic in an alley is undesirable because cars are not expected to use the alleys. Responding to Ms. Smith's question, Mr. Hanks said Police and Fire were asked prior to the implementation of the diverters if there would be a problem; if they do not concur, diverters are not installed. Ms. Miller asked about the success of procedures designed to discourage alley traffic. Mr. Hanks said one possibility would be alley diverters or the already-installed stop signs. The condition of the alleys themselves is a deterrent. The timing of the lights on 11th and 13th has been improved, which makes the alleys less desirable to use. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to adopt the Manager's recommendation and adopt the findings. Mr. Lieuallen felt that in voting for the motion, it would be responding to a problem that would continue to grow more serious. Ms. Miller did not see the issue as a conflict of bicycles and cars, but rather a decision to cut down on through traffic versus going out of the way to reach a destination. In the area she represents, reducing traffic is considered the more favorable situation. e Motion carried 6:1, Mr. Hamel voting no. B. Concurrent Annexation/Rezoning 1. Property located south of Ayres and west of Gilham from County AGT,RA to City R-l/PD (Marvin Knutson) (AZ 79-2) (Map Distributed) 2. Property located south of Ayres and east of Delta from County AGT,RA to City R-l/PD (Dessler/Allen) (AZ 79-5) (Map Distributed) Manager noted that these two properties would be considered at the same time, since the reasons for and against the annexations were similar. Mr. Saul explained that this area represented a total of 102.5 acres, 38.5 in the Dessler/Allen, and 74 in the Knutson. Thirty-five to 40 acres were in a gravel pond which the properties share. The Dessler/ Allen would be a mobile home park and PUD. The Knutson property would be PUD. The standards applicable are the City standards, the availa- bility of services, the administrative rule adopted by the LCDC, and Statewide Goals, as explained in the materials presented to the Council members. 8/13/79--4 ~ ~3L : e No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by the Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was opened. Listed below were those speaking in favor of the annexation/rezoning. James Giustina, 888 West Park, representing Marvin Knutson, noted the staff notes and minutes of the Planning Commission which recommended the annexation. He said this land is committed to urban use. It conforms to the 1990 Plan. It is surrounded by development. The area is recognized as suitable for residential housing. Services are available to this land already. The need for developed land by the city makes it desirable to annex the land. The trunk sewer line would be amortized and it would be made available to other parts of the city. Marvin Knutson, 2677 Willakenzie Road, said, if successful, their intention is to develop this acreage over a period of 10 to 12 years. Homes that are built on this property will be homes that are needed. Jerry Saunders, 2206 Donovan Drive, Chairman of Lane County Farmers and Ranchers, a division of the Farm Bureau, is a partner in the - Saunders' farm located on Ayers Road. He said this property has been farmed since 1875. He said the land is not prime farm land because it is heavier textured and short in water. It would rent for $40 an acre rather than $70 for Class 1 acreage. It is not good because of the proximity to urban areas. Larry Thorpe, 644 North A Street, Springfield, represented Dessler/ Allen, and noted his clients were available to answer questions, along with Mr. Oleson, the engineer for both projects. He referred to staff notes and minutes, as well as a letter of support from Neil Murray. He showed an artist's rendering of the planned development and the gravel pond. He explained that in the city's inventory of buildable lots, mobile home lots are not segregated. There is a need for more mobile home park lots in the city. It is a different market. He asked that the Council consider that the two requests are not the same. This request is for 48 acres, 15 under water, and only 10 acres are tillable farm land. Listed below were those testifying against the annexation. Cynthia Wooten, 670 West 10th Avenue, representing herself and People To Preserve Agricultural Land, cited the reduction in farms and farm acreage since 1935, along with the increase in population. She urged the denial of the annexation request, noting that the LCDC administra- tive rule, that the City need not apply the agricultural on annexations, e I 8/13/79--5 '733 was being challenged in court (Peterson vs. Klamath Falls). She urged at least a postponement of a decision if not a denial. She cited the e election results of Ballot Measure 10, wherein 68 percent of the Eugene electorate supported LCDC goals. She asked the cost of the extension of services and expressed concern for the lack of parks in the area, overcrowding in the schools, safety on sidewalks, building on floodplains, congestion with traffic, and lack of mass transit. Citing statistics, she argued the need for more buildable lots when 2,922 homes were listed for sale in the Eugene multiple listing and the number sold in the past week was five. She opposed the continued erosion of agricultural land and urged the denial of this annexation request. Dorothy Anderson, 393 East 21st Avenue, told the Council that they were being asked to make a judgment before the testimony on the updat~ of the 1990 Plan. They were deciding that it would be included in the urban growth boundary. She asked if these lands were clearly and demonstrably needed for that use now, or could they wait for one year. She said that with the Dessler/Allen, there is a need for mobile home sites, but the Knutson property is a different problem. To show need now would be difficult, and it would be necessary to consider the range of houses within the PUD. Tom R. Bowerman, 1370 East 25th Avenue, asked that the Council consider the will of the people of the City of Eugene. He cited page 34 of the 1990 Plan and page 10. When outward expansion is considered, it should be on our least-productive lands, he said. He cited a questionnaire e of the citizens, asking if they would wish to preserve the environment and natural resources; 61 percent gave their support. He urged the annexations not be approved. Sidney Herbert, Lane County Audubon Society, asked that the Council not foreclose on the urban service boundary and assume that it is already adopted. She asked that action not be taken on that assump- tion. She noted the mobile home park south of the annexation (Delta Pines) that has 66 spaces available. Public hearing was closed. Mr. Saul responded that this action does not disregard Statewide Goals. Based on the written material, the action was consistent with the Statewide Goals. The question of whether the administrative rule had been correctly interpreted, and whether or not an exception was required, was answered when Mr. Darnell of the Lane Council of Governments submitted the question to Mr. Kvarsten, Director of Land Conservation and Development, after the Planning Commission hearing on the two annexations. He sent the material to the Director and asked if the City should take an exception. He was told that no exception was requi red. Mr. Saul again stressed the need for mobile home parks e 'i3'f 8/13/79--6 e and for buildable land, citing a reduction in the buildable lot inventory. He said the city now has a two-year inventory. The land in question is in the urban growth and service boundary. . The Metro- politan Plan Policy Committee has recommended one version and the property is within the urban service boundary on that recommended version. To Ms. Schue's question about the floodplain, Mr. Saul replied that some of the properties are located in the floodplain and under the ordinances of the City of Eugene, those would be required to have special consideration at the time the building permit is issued. The City Engineer must establish minimum floor heights and they must be one foot over the 100-year flood elevation. Other elevations have to be established for streets and manholes. This was also approved by LCDC. Mr. Giustina, in his rebuttal, noted that the floodplain issue had been considered at the Planning Commission meeting and had been resolved. He emphasized that bringing a piece of property to devel- opment takes many years. He noted that the PUD was not limited to a certain income level. Mr. Thorpe referred to the materials showing that the schools and services were available. In noting that the opposition had suggested not to apply the administrative rule, he said he felt that these were the same people who had pushed for Peterson vs. Klamath Falls. They e did not like the ruling and they were asking for another rule. The rule is adopted and it should be followed, he said. Answering the statement that there are mobile home sites in Delta Pines, he said sale was delayed because of financing. The State has established up to 25 years financing for mobile homes and the land on which they sit at 7.5 percent, and State Veterans' loans has expanded its financing so that they are more readily available to mobile home owners. He asked that the Council apply the criteria and not pay attention to the parade of horribles. He said that the Dessler/Allen property will create recreational property and is close to the Greenway as well. Public hearing was closed. Res. No. 3195--Forwarding recommendation to Boundary Commission for annexation of property located south of Ayres and west of Gilham. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the findings supporting the annexation as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 5, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto and that resolution be adopted. - 8/13/79--7 ~35 Ms. Schue said she would vote for the motion because of the nee<1 for housing, especially in mobile home parks. It is within the urban e service boundary and is within the new proposed boundary alternatives. While being concerned for the preservation of farm lands and for the containment of urban sprawl, in this case housing becomes the most important issue, she said. Mr. Obie felt the same as Ms. Schue. While he did not understand the present housing market, he did not see people moving out of Eugene or vacating their homes. He was concerned that the buildable lot inven- tory was getting smaller and that the prices were going in the opposite direction; therefore, he would vote for the motion. Noting the constraints in all directions, Ms. Miller said the city will continue to grow; it is just a matter of how. She said that if the City did not annex the property, there is no guarantee that it will remain in agricultural production. It would be divided into one- and two-acre lots. This would be a less desirable use of the land. Mr. Lieuallen speculated about what annexation does to the urban core. He felt that the City must continue to give priority to the development within the city. Motion carried 6:1, Mr. Lieuallen voting no. Res. No. 3196--Forwarding recommendation to Boundary Commission for annexation of property located south of Ayres and east - of Delta. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the annexation as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 5, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto and that resolution be adopted. Motion carried 6:1, Mr. Lieuallen voting no. CB 1931--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT, RA to City R-1/PD for property located south of Ayres and west of Gilham. Ms. Miller asked about the public access to the gravel ponds. Mr. Saul replied that the applicants had volunteered to make the gravel ponds accessible to the public. At the Planning Commission meeting, there had been a question of liability by one member of the Commission. That was the extent of the discussion and there was no direction. Ms. Miller asked that the Council direct staff to give every consider- ation to making public accessibility as part of the PUD. Ms. Smith concurred and there was consensus. Mayor indicated that staff had so noted. e Lf36 8/13/79--8 Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the findings supporting e the rezoning as set forth in the Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 5, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto; and that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Lieuallen abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, t hat the bi 11 be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Lieuallen who voted no, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18451. CB 1937--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT,RA to City R-1/PD for property located south of Ayres and east of Delta. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in the Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 5, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Lieuallen abstaining. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved e and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Lieuallen voting no, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18452. C. Sign District Boundary Changes SDBD 79-1 through 79-15 Ma s Distributed Manager noted there were 15 ordinances necessary to correct the sign district to conform with the existing zoning district. In one case, signs would be required to be moved, Item 14--19th and Agate Street area. Mr. Saul indicated that in the last seven or eight years, the City has failed to change the sign district when zoning was changed. The 19th and Agate and the Willamette Street were simple errors at the time the Sign Code was adopted. They were not assigned sign districts. At the Planning Commission meeting people testified for the retention of the residential zoning at 19th and Agate. The Commission decided in favor of the change to commercial. Mr. Saul referred to a letter from Jensen, Billington, and Kent, attorneys, and passed photos of the structure involved. He said the property was rezoned from industrial to residential professional a year ago. The Planning Commission had assigned a sign zoning of residential to the property. There is not a question of size of the sign the attorneys want to be allowed as it is allowed by residential district signing. The only question is one of location, and that could be dealt with by a waiver or an appeal. The e letter deals with the situation particular to that structure. 8/13/79--9 /.f3? I I No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by the Councilors, except Ms. Miller who indicated that she lived across - from, but had no interest in, No.1 and would not vote in No. 14. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was opened. John Billington, 91 Madison Street, also speaking for Mr. Jensen, requested the opposition to the sign district change. Their office is a house built in 1910 and has recently been brought back to its original condition with historic integrity. They had planned to put a 16-square-foot sign in the lawn. The change in sign district from industrial to residential would require putting the sign on the face of the building. He said that this would be impractical and aestheti- cally offensive. He urged the denial of the sign district change. Public hearing was closed there being no further testimony. Mr. Saul said that the Sign Code does allow for variance and the industrial zoning is inappropriate considering the direction the City wishes the neighborhood to go. To Ms. Smith's question, Mr. Saul said that the application for variance is done through the Public Works Department and it would take four to five weeks. Mr. Saul noted that this would be taken to the Sign Code Board of Appeals and that the Sign Code Board of Appeals' ruling could be appealed to the Council by way of Council Assessment Committee. e 1. Property located south of 20th Avenue between Riverview and Augusta streets; change from Outlying Commercial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-1) CB 1946--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18453. 2. Property located east and west of Echo Hollow Road between Fuller and Marshall streets; change from Outlying Commercial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-2). - 8/13/79--10 ~38 CB 1947--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending e the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr'. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie who abstained, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18454. 3. Property located on the south side of West 3rd Avenue between Adams and Jackson streets; change from Industrial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-3) CB 1948--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. - Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie who abstained, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18455. 4. Property located north of Cal Young Road, west of Coburg Road; change from Integrated Shopping District to Residential District. CB 1949--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms.. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bi 11 was read ( the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie who abstained, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18456. 5. Property located east of Lincoln Street, north of Southern Pacific Railroad; change from Industrial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-5). . 8/13/79--11 '739 CB 1950--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. e Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18457. 6. Property located at the northeast corner of West 1st Avenue and Madison Street; change from Industrial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-6). CB 1951--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved e and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18458. 7. Property located west of the intersection of 4th Avenue and Pearl Street; change from Industrial District to Residential District (SDBC 79-7). CB 1952--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18459. 8. Property located along the west side of Lincoln Street between 1st and 2nd avenues; change from Industrial District to Residen- e tial District (SDBC 79-8). ~~O 8/13/79--12 CB 1953--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending - the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18460. 9. Property located west of Club Road, south of Interstate 105; change from Residential District to Integrated Shopping District (SDBC 79-9). CB 1954--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. e Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18461. 10. Property located east of the intersection of ~iver Road and Division Avenue; change from Residential District to Integrated Shopping District (SDBC 79-10). CB 1955--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18462. e ~~ 8/13/79--13 11. Property located east and west of Willamette Street, north of - 19th Avenue; change from Residential District to Pedestrian Auto District (SDBC 79-11). CB 1956--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18463. 12. Property located north of River Avenue east of River Road; change from Residential District to Outlying Commercial District (SDBC 79-12). CB 1957--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion e carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18464. 13. Property located at the northeast corner of Echo Hollow Road and Fuller Street; change from Residential District to Outlying Commercial District (SDBC 79-13). CB 1958--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18465. - 44~ 8/13/79--14 , 14. Property located at the intersection of 19th Avenue and Agate e Street; change from Residential District to Outlying Commercial District (SDBC 79-14). CB 1959--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Ms. Miller and Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, except Ms. Miller and Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18466. 15. Property located west of Highway 99 North, north of Roosevelt Boulevard; change from Residential District to Outlying Commer- cial District (SDBC 79-15). CB 1960--An ordinance concerning sign district classification and amending the sign district map of the city of Eugene, Oregon. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of e the Council and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Obie abstaining. The bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, with Mr. Obie abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18467. D. Street Name Change; Wilson Street to Wilson Drive Distributed Manager said this was a name change recommended by the Planning Commission and would extend from West 23rd, south to Highland Oaks Drive. Mr. Saul said this was a request by the property owners in order to have a street with the same continous street name. A portion is Wilson Street and for no apparent reason, it becomes Wilson Drive. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. . 8/13/79--15 ~43 CB 1961--An ordinance changing the street name from Wilson Street to Wilson Drive. e Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with the unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18468. E. Northwest Natural Gas Franchise Renewal Manager referred to the memo, explaining the changes from the previous franchise. One change would be granting authority for the City to ask the company to leave in the case of traffic congestion or to clear the roadway. The other would grant the City authority to tax. It is in order for adoption. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. CB 1916--Granting to Northwest Natural Gas, its successors, and assigns, for the period of 20 years from and after the effective date for this ordinance, a non-exclusive right and franchise to lay, maintain, and operate gas mains, pipes, and appurtenances in the present and future streets, alleys, public easements, walkways, bikeways, - and public places in the city of Eugene, Oregon, and thereof and others for light, heat, power, and other purposes, providing for the payment of compensation to the City, and providing for the repeal of Ordinance No. 11549, passed by the Common Council June 13, 1959, and approved by the Mayor July 14, 1959. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously. Manager noted that a franchise ordinance could not be approved and given final passage at the same meeting, so it was determined to hold over the final passage to another meeting. F. Condemnation of Park Land Acquisition: Scobert Property Manager said this comes before the Council as a result of a court case which the City has lost in Lane County Circuit Court. The judge has said that the City must pass an ordinance instead of a resolution. The City feels that the original process has been correct and in accordance with the Charter and the laws of the State. It is, however, more expeditious to bring an ordinance before the Council and proceed with the condemnation process. ~ lf4LJ 8/13/79--16 Council agreed that, although they had had a previous public hearing - on this issue as a resolution, they were obligated to start over with a p~blic hearing on this issue as an ordinance. The Council agreed to discuss this issue again. Ms. Smith said that since she was opposed to this ordinance before, she was not anxious to rehear the arguments. Mayor noted that he had scheduled this item as a public hearing. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by the Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was opened. Those citizens in favor of the ordinance testified. Gary S,ivak, 1350 Bailey Avenue, said nothing had changed since the Counci passed the resolution. It is still necessary to have a park in the area. It is necessary for the revitalization of the Blair district. People in the Whiteaker neighborhood are still in favor of having a park there. Those citizens against the ordinance testified. Dale Scobert, 1202 Dondea, said this was the fourth time this issue e had been brought up. It has been going for two-and-one-half years. With Monroe Park, Washington-Jefferson Park, Sladden Park within six blocks, there is no need for another park. There are dangerous problems in the area; frequently vagrants are on the property. He has made numerous arrests. He said there are 3,500 seniors in the city that need housing. This is what they wished to do with the property. The City has forced us into court, he said, in order to save our land. He indicated their family has owned the land since 1916. The issue is still in the court. The City is now looking at the whole block. He asked where are the citizens who are crying for a park. The City h~s imposed financial and emotional burdens upon his family. The court case is still going. He asked the Council to either postpone the condemnation or to drop it. Thomas Martin, 3620 Emerald, produced a copy of a memorandum to Keith Martin from Ed Smith, dated November 1, 1978, that said the project was initiated by Whiteaker Community Council through their CD project request in 1976. Subsequently, HCC assigned this project to be initiated through that department. The Scobert property was con- sidered first and then other sites were researched. Mr. Martin said that in the published minutes of the Whiteaker Community Council, April 12, it said the results of the Blair group meeting on the park site was related to the Council (Whiteaker Community Council). They e ~45 8/13/79--17 found that the Franz Bakery site north of 3rd between Polk and Blair . would best meet the neighborhood needs. The Council voted to ask the City to acquire the land by any means necessary. A week later, Mr. Walt Haniuk sent a letter to Mr. Scobert. On May 11, the Whiteaker Community Council mi nutes reported, IIThey di scussed the frustrati ng Blair Park situation. The Parks Department has destroyed the momentum of the project. We will write a letter to the City over the way it has been handled . . . . A meeting will be arranged. . . . II Mr. Martin felt that the Whiteaker neighborhood picked the Franz site and published it, and that the City staff picked the Scobert site and did not publish it. This will be settled in court, he said, but wondered what he should do with his building permit. III am ready to go,1I he said. Jo Lu Roberts, 2775 Friendly Street, said that on December 5 she submitted a petition of 200 people who did not want the park on that site. Maureen Goode also had a petition. III have asked for a copy of that petition, and have not been able to get a copy after three requests and two letters,1I she said. Lots of people do not even know what the Whiteaker Community Council is. She also mentioned she had been told that the old post office site was given to the City as a pa rk . R. B. Johnson, 394 Blair Boulevard, has lived across from the Scobert site si nce 1943. It does not seem fair to come in and take property away from the family, since there is not a need for a park in the area, she said. e Dale Scobert said they had received a copy of the Goode petition and had checked on the people that signed. Most of the people live in apartments, he said. A lot of the people no longer live in the area. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Mr. Obie was told that the date of the resolution was November 27, 1978, and he pointed out that Ms. Schue and Ms. Miller were not on the Council at the time. Both Ms. Schue and Ms. Miller replied that they were in the room at the time, and that they had personally seen the site during that time as well. Ms. Smith asked about Mr. Martinis building permit. Manager repl ied he did not know of a valid building permit. Mr. Martin produced a paper for the staff and Manager replied that it was news to them and they would look at it. Ms. Smith asked if a valid building permit should have an impact on the decision of the Council. Mr. Long replied that the decision of the Council is whether they want to acquire the land as a park site. Mr. Haws replied that it wouldnlt make any difference if it had a highrise on it. The issue is whether the Council wants to condemn it or not. . '1'16 8/13/79--18 Mr. Henry said the building permit is for a duplex. The area is zoned e for a duplex. High-density use for the elderly has never been appro- priate for that zoning, and it is not in the proposed plans for the Whiteaker neighbborhood zoning. Mayor replied that the issue basically is whether to condemn for a park or not to condemn. CB 1939--Repealing Res. No. 3050 and authorizing the institution of proceedings of eminent domain for the acquisition of property in the vicinity of 4th and 5th avenues and Polk Street and Blair Boulevard for a public park site and declaring an emergency. Mr. Obie said he felt this public hearing was inadequate in presenting a case for a park. The advocates of the park have not illustrated a need for such a park. He said they should allow time for both sides to make a case so that they could hear everyone that was concerned with the matter. He felt he had some doubt about the desires of the people in the area for a park. Park staff should go out and poll the neighborhood to see just what the people want. He would vote against the motion. Mr. Hamel said that he would abstain from voting on this. He would vote against it on the next motion. In 1978, he voted against the condemnation. He is not in favor of taking anyone's property for a park in an area that has so many parks. In Ward 5 there is property - that is park land but, due to lack of money, has not been developed. Mr. Lieuallen, answering Mr. Obie, said he felt the advocates had kept their comments brief as the Mayor had requested because the Council had the material and had previously heard the issue. The opposition to the park was well represented. The proponents of the park had made their case at previous meetings. To call the hearing inadequate was an unfair depiction. Ms. Smith said that she would vote against the motion because she did not feel that there was a demonstrated need. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried 4:2; Smith and Obie voting no; Hamel abstaining. Mayor noted that the final reading would be August 27, 1979. G. Public Works Bid Awards Mr. Allen corrected Project No.5 figures on the 28-foot paving to $28.7~; on the No.8 project; Proposal No.3, Eugene Sand & Gravel from 65,510.85 to 48,894.50;) and adjusted the last figure, Cost to City from 108,501.43 to 91,885.08). All the eight projects e 4117 8/13/79--19 I I were i nit i ated' by more than 50 percent of the adjacent property owners, except Property No.4 which was initiated by the City Council under e the dust program. There had been one public hearing by the staff, and there was no objection to that project. Public hearing was opened. Bill Temple, 2974 Ingalls Way, speaking on Item 3, asked why the sanitary sewers were in the bid since the residents were all hooked up to sewers. He also explained how difficult it was to get the street graded. He was for the paving so that he could get rid of the dust, even though he would lose trees. He asked the width of the paving. Mr. Allen replied that the street would be 28 feet wide. The City was required to grade a street once a year, and that was all. The sanitary sewer had been dropped from the bid and was not included in the bid amount. D. R. Rife, 142 North Grand, spoke on Project 5, paving of North Grand. He felt this was railroaded through because he received a letter on August 9, dated August 3, for a hearing August 13. Some people like paved streets, he said, but he preferred potholes. He noted the close 48 to 52 percentage vote and wondered about the new neighbors' input into this vote. Two people testified against Project 6, paving of Laurel Hill. They were Erick McLaughlin, 2480 Laurel Hill Drive, and Jim Potterf, 2420 Laurel Hill Drive. They indicated the paving would remove 18 to 20 - trees on the McLaughlin property. It would increase traffic flow. It would be a large expense on eight property owners. They quest i oned the petition since six property owners are in the city and two are in the county. The city residents signed the petition oPPosing the paving. It was initiated by one individual in order that that indivi- dual might develop his property into a PUD for 100+ homes. There will not be sewers on that street. There is no benefit to any of the residents except the person who desires to develop the property. The person wishing to develop has acreage and could develop his own streets and sewers as well. John T. Dickenson, 4310 Shasta Loop, complimented Mr. Teitzel on Project 2. He felt he had been sensitive to the needs of the neigh- borhood. He pointed out that the areas south of 30th and east of Hilyard have no satisfactory southern or eastern outlet and it will be needed for future traffic flow. Joy McLaughlin, 200 Edgewood Road, said three out of the eight property owners along Laurel Hill were present at the Council meeting. They do not stand to benefit from the paving. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Mr. Allen explained the petition process. He told the Council they do not need to have a majority in order to pave a street. It was determined that the petition percentages were made with regard to the percentage of - 448 8/13/79--20 , - front footage, not by percentage of individuals in favor. On Project 6 the developer is developing the area and eventually there would be a need for a paved city street for access. The paving of Laurel Hill Drive will result in the removal of 44 to 50 trees varying in width. Mr. Lieuallen left the meeting. Mr. Obie asked how many city residents were in favor of the Laurel Hill pavi ng. Mr. Allen replied 46 percent. Mr. Haws said the issue was to pave or not to pave, regardless of the petition. To Ms. Millerls question regarding the width of the paving, Mr. Allen replied it would be between 24 and 28 feet wide, depending upon the trees. To the question of County jurisdiction, Mr. Allen replied that all but one parcel has been worked out with the County. Mr. Allen noted that the State would construct a connector to Laurel Hill Drive from the 1-5 interchange at Augusta Street. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to award the bids. Mr. Obie and Ms. Miller indicated that they would vote no on Item 6. Ms. Smith asked Mr. Allen what would happen if they did, and he replied that the developer would make his access road or will continue to use Laurel Hill Drive. e Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Miller, to segregate Item 6. Motion carried 5:1, Mr. Hamel voting no. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to not award Item 6. Mayor noted that the motion would serve no useful purpose. It is inevitable and having experience with Willamette Street one time, it should have been approved and wasnlt. When it was approved, the price had come back six or eight dollars higher. He found that if a street were needed in a system, it is best to approve it. He hoped the Council would find that they should support the motion to pave Item 6. Motion not to award Item 6 carried 4:2, Hamel and Haws voting no. Motion to award all other Bid Awards to the lowest bidder carried unanimously. Upon motion duly made and passed, the meeting was adjourned to August 15, 1979. Respectfully submitted, c~~ e Ci ty Manager (Recorded by Beth Conant) BC:pm/CM8b12 4 '+t:t 8/13/79--21 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division Bid No. 8 Opened: August 7 & 9_ 1979 1. PAVING, SANITARY 'SEWER, STORM SEWER AND PEDESTRIAN WAY within and adjacent to Treehouse PUD; sanitary sewer on Frederick Court from 35th Place to 450' west; and paving Dellwood Drive from 450' northwest of 38th Avenue to 650' northwest of 38th Avenue. (Job No. 1538) Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD l. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------$ 414,526.63 2. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.--------------$ 421,929.53 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------$ 428,234.00 4. Wildish Construction Co.--------------------$ 454,247.50 5. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------------$ 459,824.70 , 6. H & J Construction--------------------------$ 460,681.80 Cost to Abutting Property: Cost to City Amount Budgeted 281 Paving $ 34.00/FF Paving - $ 1,000.00 ---- None 34' Paving $ 40.50/FF Storm Sewer $ 6,200.00 ---- $ 9,500.00 Ped.Way $ 470.00/Lot San. Lat. $1,970.00/Lot San.Serv. $ 260.00/Lot Storm$wr. $ 960.00/Lot COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1980 ______________________________________________________----------------------------------------ilt--- 2. PAVING AND STORM SEWER: Paving Dillard Road from East Amazon Drive to East 43rd Avenue and paving and storm sewer on 43rd Avenue and North Shasta Loop from Dillard Road to existing paving on North Shasta Loop (Job No. 1351) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD l. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----------------$ 309,908.47 $ -0- 2. H & J Construction-------------------------$ -0- $ 316,478.35 3. Morse Bros. ~Contractors, Inc.--------------$ -0- $ 316,792.00 4. Wildish Construction Co.-------------------$ -0- $ 317,286.32 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted 201 Paving $ 21. 10/FF Paving -- $ 11,000.00 ---- $ 21,000.00 28' Paving $ 28.50/FF Storm Sewer - $ 34,000.00 ---- $ 26,200.00 361 Paving $ 36.00/FF Cone. Drive $ 2.36/SF A. C. Drive $ 0.36/SF San.Service 611 $ 620.00/Each 811 $1,380.00/Each ,. e COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1980 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 450 Page 1 of 4 3. PAVING AND SANITARY SEWER on Ingalls Way - from the end of existing pavement to 860 feet south. (Job No. 1704) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AHARD 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------$ 44,495.60 -0- 2. Wildish Construction Co.----------------$ -o- S 44,746.93 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 47,075.05 -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted 28' Paving $ 27.50/FF None None Pave Without curb $ 17.00/FF Concrete Drive $ 2.57/SF A.C. Drive $ 0.35/SF COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1979 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- .4. PAVING on Jefferson Street from Clark Avenue to 300 feet north of River Street (Job No. 1752) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate ,r 1. Wildish Construction Co.----------------$ 64,936.45 $ 61,306.55 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------$ -0- $ 61,502.73 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------$ -0- $ 61,836.35 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted 281 Paving $ 24.10/FF Paving --- $23,700.00 $45,540.00 Conc.Drive $ 3.92/SF Park -- $18,000.00 $12,000.00 COMPLETION DATE: October 25, 1979 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. PAVING on North Grand Street from Polk Court (extended) to Cheshire Street (extended) (Jab No. 1663) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD 1. Wildish Construction Co.----------------$ -0- $ 58,400.00 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------$ 61,601.66 $ -0- 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 69,311.36 $ 64,884.57 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ;t6.10 28' Paving $ s3~.ee/FF Paving - $ 1,000.00 ---- $ 13,300.00 e Cone. Drive $ 1 .85/SF Park - $ 1,500.00 ---- $ 6,000.00 A.C. Drive $ 0.35/SF COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1979 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '15/ Page 2 of 4 6. PAVING on Laurel Hill Drive from the access of the Glenwood Interchange at Interstate 5 to the south boundary of Judkins Heights - Subdivision. (Job No. 1616) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD 1. Wi1dish Construction Co.----------------$ -0- $ 126, 171. 50 2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.--------------$ 131,521.45 $ -0- 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 143,774.25 $ 135,383.50 4. H & J Construction----------------------$ -0- $ 137,678.65 5. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------$ -0- $ 139,662.83 6. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----------$ -0- $ 142,577.95 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted 281 Paving $ 27.60/FF Paving - $ 15,200.00 ---- $ 7,000.00 Conc.Drive $ 2. 10/SF Storm - $ 5,200.00 un $ -0- A.C. Drive $ 0.40/SF San.Lat. $ 0.12/SF San.Service $ 615.00/Each COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1979 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e 7. STORM SEWER Approximately 120 feet north of Vernon Way from Calvin Street to approximately 120 feet west of President Street. (Job No. 1645) Bi dders: Contract Cost AWARD 1- Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----,--------$ 34,294.20 2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.--------------$ 34,593.00 3. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----------$ 36,520.25 4. H & J Construction----------------------$ 42,599.00 5. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------$ 43,291.00 Cost Direct to Church Cost to City Amount Budgeted $ 5,700.00 $ 32,000.00 $ 27,000.00 COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1979 -----------,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e J152.: .' Page 3 of 4 ., e8. OVERLAYS - 1979 Overlay Projects, 2nd Phase 7 Various Locations (Job No. 1794) PROPOSAL NO. 1 One Location - Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Morse Bros. Contractors', Inc.---------------------$ 18,352.00 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------------$ 20,656.00 3. Wildish Construction Co.----------~---------------$ 23,360.00 PROPOSAL NO. 2 Three Locations - Bidders: AWARD- 1. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------------$ 24,638.58 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------------$ 26,004.75 3. Wi1dish Construction Co.--------------------------$ 32,068.00 PROPOSAL NO. 3 e Three Locations - Bidders: Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------------$ 65,510.85 AWARD 1. 2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------------$ 68,947.20 3. Wildish Construction Co.--------------------------$ 78,115.00 Cost to City Amount Budgeted Proposal No. 1 -- $ 18,352.00 Proposal No.2 -- $ 24,638.58 Proposal No.3 -- $ 65,510.85 ~~I~a~.5D $ 92,750.00 TOTAL: $1OO,~01. 43-- (H /6'65.vD COMPLETION DATE: September 30, 1979 .----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. - Page 4 of 4 J.fS3