HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/08/1979 Meeting
M I NUT E S
e EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
October 8, 1979
Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called
to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 7:30 p.m., October 8, 1979, Council
Chamber, with the following Councilors present: Jack Delay, Betty Smith, D. W.
Hamel, Eric Haws, Scott Lieuallen (arrived late), Brian Obie, Gretchen Miller,
and Emily Schue.
I. AGENDA CHANGES
Manager announced that the award of the sanitary sewer contract on
Henderson Avenue, under Public Works Bid Awards, would be discussed
at a later date. He also mentioned that the first reading of the
ordinance for Willakenzie Island Area 2 would be held over until
October 29.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Concurrent Annexation/Rezoning
e 1- Property located southeast of the terminus of Augusta
Street and south of the terminus of Laurel Hill Drive
from County RA Suburban R~sidential District and AGT
Agricultural, Grazing, and Timber-Raising District to
City RA Suburban Residential District and RA/PD Suburban
Residential District with Planned Unit Development
Procedures (Stevens) (AZ 79-1) (Map Distributed)
Mr. Jim Saul, Planner, said the area in question involves 42 acres.
The Stevens portion totals 39 acres, is undeveloped wooded property,
and is a portion of the overall Stevens property which extends north
and east to the area proposed for annexation. The portion immedi-
ately north of the subject request is the 27.16-acre Judkin Heights
Subdivision parcel, already approved for 102 lots and currently under
constructi on. The Marks property is a 3.36-acre parcel and is devel-
oped with a single-family residence. The original petition included
only the Stevens property; however, it would have surrounded the Marks
property and Mr. Marks agreed to annexation. During the review, a
principal concern involved how access would be provided to the prop-
erty. The Laurel Hill Citizens Association and staff felt that access
should be provided by a route other than Augusta Street. Detail shave
been completed and access would now be provided by a new street known
e
10/8/79--1
5'-16
as Moon Mountain Drive. There are services available to the area and
the annexation is a logical extension. Findings are included which
are pertinent to LCDC administrative rules and Statewide Goals. He e
felt the annexation could be supported if access were assured other
than by Augusta Street and if PUD procedures were attached. He said
the Planning Commission did not recommend that those conditions be
attached to the Marks property as it is suitable for RA zoning because
of its smaller size and lack of more difficult and sensitive develop-
ment factors, such as steeper terrain, significant vegetation, and
more difficult topographic features which are present in the larger
39-acre Stevens parcel.
No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Councilors.
Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record.
Public hearing was opened.
Dan Leahy, 2405 Bailey Hill Road, spoke in favor of the annexation/
rezoning.
Public hearing was closed.
Res. No. 3250--A resolution forwarding recommendation to the Boundary
Commission for annexation of property located southeast of
the terminus of Augusta Street and south of the terminus of
Laurel Hill Drive to the City of Eugene and the Lane County
Metropolitan Wastewater Service District was read by number e
and title.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
the annexation set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of September 4, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto, and
that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously.
CB 2005--Authorizing rezoning from County RA Suburban Residential District
and AGT Agricultural, Grazing, and Timber-Raising District to
City RA Suburban Residential District and RA/PD Suburban Resi-
dential District with Planned Unit Development Procedures for
property located southeast of the terminus of Augusta Street and
south of the terminus of Laurel Hill Drive was read by number
and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting it
be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of September 4, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto;
that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only,
with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be
considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill
was read the second time by council bill number only.
e
10/8/79--2
5~1
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
e and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present
voting aye. the bill was declared passed and numbered 18513.
2. Property located south of Martin Drive between West
Amazon Drive and Center Way from County AGT Agricul-
tural, Grazing, and Timber-Raising District to City
R-1/PD Single-Family Residential District with Planned
Unit Development procedures. and R-1 Single-Family
Residential District (Frank Anderson) (AZ 79-8) (Map
Distributed)
Mr. Saul, Planner, said the Anderson property involves 42 acres south
of Martin Drive. It also involves a 135-acre tract owned by the City
of Eugene which will be incorporated into the Ridgeline Park system.
Diane Nechak, Boundary Commission, had requested the City property be
included in the annexation. She has been working with rural fire
departments establishing reasonable boundaries in the area, and she
felt it would be an appropriate inclusion.
Mr. Saul said there were concerns expressed as follows: There had
been a concern by some residents north of the property about the
effect on drainage problems on their own properties; however, there
will be extensive review of any drainage provisions made after annex-
ation, at the time the developed proposal is submitted. That would
be a specific reason for requiring that PUD procedures be followed.
A concern was also expressed whether access through the property would
e be through Martin Drive or from the south via West Amazon Drive.
Access would have to be provided in sequential fashion. No determin-
ation has been made yet as to whether West Amazon Drive would be
maintained.
Public hearing was opened.
Douglas Melevin, 59 East 14th Avenue, asked that their petition for
annexation/rezoning be incorporated by reference thereto into the
record.
Public hearing was closed.
Res. No. 3251--A resolution forwarding recommendation to the Boundary
Commission for annexation of property located south of
Martin Drive between West Amazon Drive and Center Way
to the City of Eugene and the Lane County Metropolitan
Wastewater Service District was read by number and title.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
annexation as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of September 4, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto, and
that the resolution be adopted. Motion carried unanimously.
e
10/8/79--3
5~8
--
CB 2006--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT Agricultural, Grazing,
and Timber-Raising District to City R-1/PD Single-Family Resi- e
dential District with Planned Unit Development procedures and
R-l Single-Family Residential District for property located south
of Martin Drive between West Amazon Drive and Center Way was read
by number and title only, there being no Councilor present
requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of September 4, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto;
that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only
with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be
considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill
was read the second time by council bill number only.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
an given final passage. Ro 11 ca 11 vote. All Councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18514.
B. Rezoning
1. Property located in the East Butte District in the Whiteaker
Neighborhood between Skinner Butte Park and High Street, south
of vacated east-west alley south of Cheshire Street, and north
of the east-west alley north of 4th Avenue from R-2 Limited
Multiple-Family Residential District and RG Garden Apartment
District to R-2/20A Limited Multiple-Family Residential District e
with a maximum density of 20 units per acre. (Eugene Planning
Commission; East Butte) (Z 79-24) (Map Distributed)
Mr. Saul, Planner, said that the May 24, 1978, Whiteaker Refinement
Plan determined that certain portions of East Butte should be medium
density and other portions medium to high density. Medium density
means 10 to 20 units per acre for the portion of the historic landmark
area and medium-high density means 20 to 30 units per acre plan
designation for the northern portion of that area. At the same time,
it directed consideration of historic preservation for the area.
The Historic Review Board completed its work on review of historic
area designation for development of standards and Council approved the
plan on April 11, 1979. It approved the standards under which new
development were also to occur. This rezoning is the last step in
that implementation plan. Staff recommended, and the Planning Commis-
sion concurred with, the approach of using R-2 zoning with density up
to 20 units per acre which is consistent with the Refinement Plan for
the medium-density area.
e
10/8/79--4
54~
No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by
e Councilors.
Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record.
Public hearing was opened.
David Filer, 235 East 3rd Avenue, spoke in favor of the zone change
itself; however, he suggested that Council redraw the boundaries. He
noted that there is a difference in the map that was issued and the
language of the council bill. He would concur with the language of
the council bill, but he said the map shows that not only an area
north of the vacated east-west alley, but also two other lots south of
the alley have been excluded ,from the zone change. He would favor
inclusion of those two other lots. Mr. Saul confirmed that the
request exempts the two lots in question. Mr. Filer went on to say
that Council should examine the boundaries and correct them so that
the two lots, Tax Lots 900 and 1000, are not excluded. Thoug~ he sai~
it seems a small change, there are important principles involved. In
the adoption of the Refinement Plan, the question of density was
discussed and settled that the area south should be limited to medium
density, with the northern area medium to high density. If the
Council should adopt the zone change as outlined, it would be in
confl ict. He said it would not only not be in the public interest,
but contrary to the public interest, to exclude the two lots. A
development using RG zoning is planned on those lots. The provi-
e sions in the historic ordinance cannot apply as long as a valid
building permit is issued. At this time, that development is still
only planned. If the permit should fail or a new development occur
sometime in the future, it would be in the public interest that any
new development be held to the medium-density limit. He would
note also that, until the time of the Planning Commission hearing,
the Historic Review Board had not been notified, nor had they contri-
buted an opinion on the correctness of the zone change.
Ron McMullin, 1420 East Briarcliff, representing the Land Use Commit-
tee of the Whiteaker Community Council, said they have discussed the
East Butte area extensively. His concern is about the fact that the
original zoning included the land vacant north of the alley which is
south of Cheshire, an original part of the historic designation, and
which has been excluded from the zone change. He wants to know if
Planning will rezone in the future to conform with medium-high
density and how they plan to do it. He understands that a portion
south of the alley is also a special district and did not exist prior
to this specific zone change. This is the only instance of an R-2/20A
District. He would reiterate the fact that the Planning staff has not
contacted the Historic Review Board and presented or asked for an
opinion on the matter. He questioned whether an area's refinement
plan or the Planning Commission's opinions are the final word for an
a rea.
e
10/8/79--5
550
Public hearing was closed.
Mr. Lieuallen arrived at the meeting. e
Mr. Saul said the Planning Department and Planning Commission feel
that the existing RG zoning retained there permits medium to high
density and there is no further need for rezoning. The property that
extended up to Cheshire was included in the historic area designation.
He added that this is, at the present time, the only R-2/20A zoning
in the city. However, there are situations where there is R-2 zoning
with a ten unit/acre limit. The matter was not submitted to the
Historic Review Board because there was no particular correlation.
The Historic Review Board has reviewed the area at length and sub-
mitted recommendations. The Council has also accepted the Board's
recommendations. Staff is simply implementing what the Board earlier
recommended. Mr. Saul said the Council is aware that the Planning
Commission, when it submitted its original recommendations to the
Council, felt this area was appropriate for high density as opposed
to medium density. On the issue involving the two tax lots, it was
the intent to retain that area as medium-high. He would note that the
owners of those two lots have not been formally notified that consider-
ation was given to rezoning them, and so it would not be possible for
Council to include those at this time.
In answer to Mr. Obie, Mr. Saul said R-2/20A provides the maximum
allowable density under the Refinement Plan. Mr. Lieuallen wondered
about earlier discussion excluding Tax Lots 900 and 1000. Mr. Saul
said that when the Planning Commission reviewed the Historic Review -
Board's recommendations, there was discussion of that question. He
noted those two tax lots are part of the overall Poticha development.
Ms. Schue wondered if the adopted Historic District intended to
exclude those two lots, and Mr. Saul responded that that is a matter
of judgment and interpretation. Mr. Saul verified to Ms. Miller
that the historic review process supersedes the earlier provisions
of the Whiteaker Refinement Plan. The Whiteaker Refinement Plan of
May 8, 1978, states that the area would be zoned for residential
medium density, with up to 20 units per acre for the entire area.
The Historic Review Board recommended a portion as medium-high and a
portion medium on April 11, 1979.
CB 2007--Authorizing rezoning from R-2 Limited Multiple-Family Residen-
. tial District and RG Garden Apartment District to R-2/20A Limited
Multiple-Family Residential District with a maximum density of 20
units per acre for property located in the East Butte District of
the Whiteaker Neighborhood between Skinner Butte Park and High
Street, south of the vacated east-west alley south of Cheshire
Street and north of the east-west alley north of 4th Avenue was
read by number and title only, there being no Councilor present
requesting it be read in full.
e
10/8/79--6
55/
Ms. Miller felt the result of this ordinance would be that the zoning
e would not correspond to the ordinance adopted earlier. She feels
Council should direct the Planning Commision to consider this issue.
Her inclination would be to amend the rezoning at this point. Mr.
Lieuallen said that, at the meeting where the question of rezoning was
discussed, he was not thinking in terms of the Poticha project, so did
not consider the portion south of the alley. Ms. Schue felt some
frustration with the whole situation. Nobody at the earlier meeting
understood the significance of the plans in this area and Council is
now in the situation where no matter what it wants to do, that cannot
be done. Ms. Miller said she is not suggesting that the motion be
opposed or action not be taken. The question is whether there are
additional areas that need treatment. It appears that there will be
an adopted plan and zoning that don't agree. She favors sending that
question to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and
minutes of September 4, 1979, be adopted by reference thereto,
that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only,
with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be
considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill
was read the second time by council bill number only.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18515.
e Ms. Miller moved to direct the Planning Commission to consider
Tax Lots 900 and 1000 and consider whether it would be more
appropriate to amend the plan for the area or rezone the tax lots.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Mr. Lieuallen asked: if the Planning Commission considered further
zoning for those lots and they were to zone in conformance with the
lots to the south of the alley which would be R-2 zoning and then
the Poticha project continued, would that be a nonconforming use
in the district, and what are the implications. Mr. Saul said it
would become a nonconforming use because it exceeded the density
permitted. If it were destroyed by more than 50 percent, it would
have to be rebuilt at the lesser density.
Mr. Lieuallen said he would favor the plan being amended rather than
the rezoning. Mr. Obie agreed with Mr. Lieuallen.
c. Supplemental Budget
Manager said in explaining the supplemental budget tha? since the
serial levy was passed converting it to a bond issue, 1,673,500 was
then made available for parkland acquisition and it is estimated that
certain parklands will be purchased during the current fiscal year.
e
10/8/79--7
55L
Another large item is $70,000 of anti-recession funds. The supple-
mental budget would appropriate these funds as contingency pending any e
eligible unanticipated expense that may arise this year. Federal
regulations require that such actions be taken. An amount totalling
$60,741 in the General Fund is included in this budget for two federal
grants received by the Library since July 1. Also, the Risk Management
Fund is requesting an appropriation of $10,000 to set up a recoverable
damages activity. The funds will come from damage claim recovery from
third parties. . The final item is for $3,000 in the Aviation Fund to
replace an inoperable public address system, using revenues generated
by additional landing fees from Frontier Airlines.
Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
CB 2008--An ordinance adopting the supplemental budget; making appro-
priations for the City of Eugene for the fiscal year beginning
July 1, 1979, and ending June 30, 1980; and declaring an emer-
gency was read by number and title only, there being no Councilor
present requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be read the
second time by council bill number only with unanimous consent of
the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time.
Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time
by council bill number only.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present e
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18516.
D. Public Works Bids
Public Works Director reminded Council that the fifth item, sanitary
sewer on Henderson, was being held over. Staff recommends awarding to
the low bidder on all other projects.
Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to award the contracts to
the low bidder on all of the projects. Motion carried unanimously.
III. ORDINANCES FOR SECOND READING
A. Levying Assessments
Manager noted that a hearing panel session was not necessay as no one
indicated a desire to testify on these assessments.
The following council bills were read the first time, September 24, 1979,
and referred to the Hearings Panel for hearing October 1, 1979, and
brought back for Council consideration to levy assessments as proposed:
-
10/8/79--8
553
.
-
CB 1998--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, storm sewer,
e and pedestrian way to serve Souza Park 4th Addition and to serve
Candlelight Park 4th Addition was read by number and title only,
there being no Councilor present requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Ro 11 ca 11 vote. All Councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18517.
CB 1999--Levying assessments for sanitary sewer along south side of
Beltline Road from Coburg Road to 3,000 feet east was read
by number and title only, there being no Councilor present
requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Roll call vote. All Councilors present
voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18518.
CB 2000--Levying assessments for paving, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer
in Garden Meadow Subdivision; and paving Crescent Avenue from
west boundary from Garden Meadow Subdivision to 300 feet west was
read by number and title only, there being no Councilor present
requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that the bill be approved
and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Councilors present
e voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18519.
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS FROM JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION/COUNCIL MEETING
ON ANTHONY J. STAHELSKI REZONING REQUEST (Z 79-2) (MAP DISTRIBUTED)
Mr. Saul said the question was one of access and the affect the property
will have on Alder as well as consensus of conversion of this property in
terms of the adjacent area, particularly to the east. He reminded Council
that the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the application
originally and had reaffirmed its approval at the joint meeting.
CB 1906--Authorizing rezoning of property located west of Alder, south
of 24th, from R-1 Single-Family Residential District to C-1/SR
Neighborhood Commercial District with Site Review procedures and
change of sign district from Residential to Outlying Commercial
District was read by number and title only, there being no
Councilor present requesting it be read in full.
Mr. Delay wanted the record to note that, while he could not attend the
joint meeting, he did attend the original meeting and reviewed the record
of the joint meeting. Mr. Lieuallen said he now favors the rezoning. He
has a concern about the bike path going down Alder Street. He feels that
it would be possible to specify that access to the particular property be
e
10/8/79--9
55Jf
~
done from the alley only, not from Alder, and that that provision could .
be applied to the property no matter how many times the property would
be sold. He suggested specifying site review procedures. Mr. Haws said e
he did not attend the original meeting or the joint meeting and did not
review the record, so will abstain from voting.
Mr. Haws left the meeting.
Ms. Schue said it was her understanding that the zoning would cover the
entire lot. What Mr. Lieuallen is suggesting does not seem possible, she
said. Mr. Saul responded that the rezoning would cover the entire lot.
In an earlier discussion, the question had been raised about the possi-
bility of additional commercial development should rezoning occur.
However, site review does involve a question of access. Council can
designate that access shall be limited to the alley. Mr. Delay had
earlier been concerned about division of property. Mr. Saul said a
division of property would create a number of problems. It woul d create
two substandard lots and there are other problems as well. Mr. Delay said
the issue, as he sees it, remains whether it is desirable to commit that
block to commercial activity. It is of record that the owners to the
south would be inclined to want this type of activity themselves. The
question becomes whether Council wants to set in motion the conversion of
this block to that much commercial activity and, if so, whether having all
alley access is wise. Mr. Lieuallen thought it would be safe to rezone
this area provided that access be only from the alley. He said that there
would probably be limited requests for commercial development because few
businesses could function effectively with that limited access. Mr. Delay
and Mr. Obie both felt, however, that a mix needs to be retained. e
Mr. Lieuallen wondered about future liability should Council rezone this
particular piece of property, but deny another's request. Mr. Saul said
the court would look at the code or the statutes. Mr. Lieuallen feels
Council would be providing a community benefit by adding the necessary
amenities to the area. He does not see the inevitability of a domino
effect. Mr. Hamel did not feel it would hurt Alder any more by allowing
an extra 60 feet of commercial activity, and Mr. Delay felt that it would
be unwise to bind future Councils to keeping access strictly through the
a 11 ey . Ms. Schue said that people from many areas of town, not just that
immediate area, stop there to shop. She fears a larger regional develop-
ment would occur if more commercial activity is allowed.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, that findings supporting
the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission findings and
conclusions of April 3, 1979, and reaffirmed August 27, 1979, be
adopted by reference thereto, that the bill be read the second
time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the
Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion
failed, Mr. Hamel and Mr. Lieuallen voting aye, and Ms. Smith,
Mr. Delay, Ms. Miller, Mr. Obie, and Ms. Schue voting no.
e
10/8/79--10
555
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to deny the Planning
e Commission recommendation and direct staff to prepare findings
of fact. Motion carried, all Councilors present voting aye,
except Mr. Lieuallen and Mr. Hamel voting no.
v. PAYMENT OF BILLS, CLAIMS, AND PROGRESS PAYMENTS
Res. No. 3252--Authorizing the payment of bills, claims, and progress
payments for the period of September 24, 1979, through
October 8, 1979 was read by number and title.
Mr. Delay moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt the resolution.
Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously.
Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the meeting was adjourned to
October 10, 1979.
~)~
Charl es T. Henry
City Manager
(Recorded by Diane Price)
DP:so/CM23b1
--e
e
10/8/79--11
551:,
}
...
r~
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS .~..:,:....:,
- Engineering Division
Bid No. 11 & 12
Opened: October 3, 1979
1. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND SIDEWALK
on Bertelsen Road from 11th Avenue to 20th Avenue
(County Road #426); and paving and sidewalk on 18th
Avenue from Bertelsen Road to Four Oaks Grange Road.
(Job No. 1730)
Contract Cost
Bidders: Basic Alternate
AWARD 1. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------$ 636,867.55 $ 588,311.89
2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------$ -0- $ 593,051.15
3. H & J Construction--------------------------$ -0- $ 612,634.52
4. Wildish Construction Co.--------------------$ 652,939.05 $ 645,977.68
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
Paving 201 $ 22.20/FF
Paving 36' $ 28.80/FF Paving ---- $ 57,000.00 ----- $ 53,200.00
Paving 441 $ 41.00/FF
Conc. 411 $ 1.80/SF
e Cone. 5" $ 2.00/SF
Cone. 711 $ 2.50/SF
San.Swr. $ 30,000.00 Storm Sewer ---- $ 290,000.00 ----- $ 155,200.00 City
----- $ 155,200.00 County
COMPLETION DATE: July 15, 1980
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
2. SANITARY SEWER on Coburg Road from Crescent
Avenue to Kinney loop. (Job No. 1764)
Bidders: Contract Cost
AWARD 1. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.-----------------$ 11,698.00
2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.------------------$ 15,740.00
3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.---------------------$ 23,720.00
4. H & J Construction-----------------------------$ 32,650.00
5. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.---------------------$ 33,615.00
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
San. Sewer $ 0.21/SF -0- -0-
San.Service $ 210.00/Each
COMPLETION DATE: November 15, 1979
-~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
551
Page 1 of 3
.
(0 .
3. STORM SEWERt Parkside Drive at Parkside Lane.
e (Job No. 1744)
Bidders: Contract Cost
AWARD 1- Eugene Sand & Gravelt Inc.--------------------$ 9,277:50
2. H & J Construction----------------------------$ 9,910.00
3. Shur-Way Contractorst Inc.--------------------$ 11,189.00
4. Morse Bros. Contractorst Inc.-----------------$ 12t538.00
5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----------------$ 15,345.00
6. Wi1dish Construction Co.----------------------$ 19,250.00
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
-0- $ 9,277.50 ----- $ 8,000.00
COMPLETION DATE: November 15t 1979
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bid No. 12
l. PAVING AND SIDEWALK on Wi11amette Street from Stonewood
Drive to 52nd Avenue; and sanitary sewer on Wil1amette
Street from Marlboro Lane to 52nd Avenue. (Job No.
e 1731 & 1641)
Contract Cost
Bidders: Basic Alternate
AWARD l. Eugene Sand & Gravelt Inc.------------------$ -0- $172,332.36
2. H & J Construction--------------------------$ -0- $ 179,116. 1 0
3. Wi1dish Construction Co.--------------------$ -0- $ 187t454.30
4. Morse Bros. Contractorst Inc.---------------$ 200,703.85 $ 191,521.85
Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted
Paving 28' $ 34.80/FF Paving ------ $ 16t700.00 ----- $ 70,100.00
Paving 361 $ 39.70/FF Storm Sewer ------ $ 10,000.00 ----- $ -0-
Sidewalk 4" $ 1 .60/SF Parks --~--~ $ 76,300.00 ----- $ -0-
San.Lateral $ 0.15/SF San.Swr. Deferred n_ $22,500.00,;----- $ 23,000.00
COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1980
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.
e
. 558
Page 2 of 3