The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08/11/1980 Meeting I M I NUT E S e EUGENE CITY COUNCIL August 11, 1980 Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 7:30 p.m., August 11, 1980, with the following councilors present: Betty Smith, Scott Lieuallen, BrianObie, Eric Haws, D. W. Hamel, Gretchen Miller, and Emily Schue. Councilor Jack Delay was absent. Mr. Henry noted that there would'be an International Youth Association dinner held on Wednesday. Those who wish to attend should notify Jean Paul. I. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Concurrent Annexation/Rezoning 1. Property located on the east side of Bertelsen Road between West 18th Avenue and Bailey Hill Road from County RA Suburban District to City R-1 Low-Density Residential (Eugene Rouch, Jr.) (A/Z 80-1) e (map distributed) Mr. Henry stated that this item has been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission which voted 6:0 on annexation and 4:2 on zoning on July 1, 1980. This is a zone change and a request for annexation to the Lane County Metropolitan Wastewater Service District. He introduced Bill French, Planning, to provide back- ground information. Mr. French stated that Adrienne Lannom also is present from the Planning Commission if questions need to be directed to her. He referred to page II-A-15 on the agenda for the map of where this property is located. It is on the east side of Bertelsen Road between West 18th and Bailey Hill Road. Presently, it is vacant and the applicant is requesting annexation. The land use is basically residential, but to the west is property that is still within the county. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were noted. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. Public hearing was opened. e 8/11/80--1 . L Eugene Rouch, Jr., applicant, stated that he is available to e answer any questions. There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. Res. No. 3410--A resolution for the recommendation to the Boundary Commission for annexation of property located on the east side of Bertelsen Road between West 18th Avenue and Bailey Hill Road to the City of Eugene and the Lane County Metro- politan Wastewater Service District. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the annexation as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 1, 1980, be adopted by reference thereto; and that the resolution be adopted. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. CB 2182--Authorizing rezoning from County RA Suburban District to City R-1 Low-Density Residential District for property located on the east side of Bertelsen Road between West 18th Avenue and Bailey Hill Road. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 1, 1980, be adopted by reference thereto; that e the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unan- imously. Council Bill 2182 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18688. B. Rezoning 1. Property located on the west side of Mistletoe Street north of Mist Court from RA Suburban Residential District to R-2/SR Limited Multiple-Family Residential District with Site Review Procedures (L. C. Jarnagin) (Z 80-13) (map distributed). Mr. Henry noted that this item comes to the council without a recommendation from the Planning Commission, since their vote on July 1, 1980, was 3:3. He introduced Jerry Jacobson, Plan- ning, to provide background information. e 8/11/80--2 Mr. Jacobson indicated that this parcel contains 3,700 square feet and is located on the west side of Mistletoe. The property e is vacant and there are no significant natural characteristics. There is a PUD, Bailey Meadows, on the north side of the property. On the west side, a parcel was recently rezoned from RA to R-2/SR zoning with single-family residential properties. The R-2/SR zoning would permit 13 units on the subject property. Mr. Haws asked what the density of the property to the north was and how many units per acre are allowed. Mr. Jacobson responded that there are up to 16 units per acre allowed. Ms. Schue asked if the reason for suggesting inclusion of site review procedures was to state that access would only be from Bailey Hill Road. Mr. Jacobson indicated that this recommendation came from Commissioner Thwing; it is not a staff recommendation. Ms. Smith asked if access is going to be from both Bailey Hill Road and Mistletoe. She asked if there was a possibility of eliminating Mistletoe as an access street. Mr. Jacobson stated that that might be difficult since that is the only frontage, especially if the property should be sold before it would be developed. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were noted. Staff notes and minutes were entered into the record. - Public hearing was opened. Speaking in favor: Leon Jarnagin, the applicant, stated they can funnel most of the trattlc out onto Bal ley Hill Road if it is necessary. Speaking in opposition: Richard Plumb, 3465 West 15th, pointed out that there is a large sectlon north of Tax Lot 200 where there are 40 to 80 apartments on a lot which is zoned RA. He thinks that is an error. He would like the council to consider this carefully and what could happen if apartments go in. If this access on Mistletoe were allowed, it would create more confusion on an already busy street. There being no further testimony, public hearing was closed. Mr. Jacobson noted that the property to which Mr. Plumb referred is zoned RA and developed with a Planned Unit Development, and that is why there are apartments there. e 8/11/80--3 I CB 2183--Authorizing rezoning from RA Suburban Residential District to R-2/SR Limited Multiple-Family Residential District with Site e Review procedures for property located on the west side of Mistletoe Street north of Mist Court. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 1, 1980, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment be considered at this time. . Mr. Obie noted that since the Planning Commission had a split vote, he took the time today to visit the property. Mistletoe is basically undeveloped, adjacent to the property. Mr. Jacobson agreed that it is an unimproved street. Mr. Obie stated that it is narrow and all adjacent lots are single-family residences. He feels the traffic observations are valid, and although he would normally be supportive of higher density, he would like to limit access to Bailey Hill Road. Mr. Lieuallen arrived at the meeting. Mr. Jacobson stated that under the present RA zoning, the prop- erty could be developed with four units under the cluster subdi- vision or it could be developed by using panhandle lots, all with access from Mistletoe Street. - Mr. Obie asked if these things could happen without a zone change and the access be limited. Mr. Farah responded that they could and they would try as part of the site review to send a major portion of traffic to Bailey Hill Road. This could be done, but it would be creating a touchy situation for the owner in the future. - James Weathers, the developer, stated that there is a 12-foot buffer zone for fire and police access with the rest of the traffic going to Bailey Hill Road. Mr. Obie noted that the council could approve this with access only for emergency vehicles on Mistletoe. Ms. Schue stated concern about the traffic and asked if there is access to Mistletoe from the apartments to the north. ~. Jacobson responded that there is a 12-foot-wide emergency vehicle access. Ms. Schue then asked where the traffic is coming from that causes the confusion. ~. Jacobson responded that Mistletoe is unimproved and used by the surrounding area for access onto 18th. Ms. Miller noted that it is appropriate that a street . 8/11/80--4 e is unimproved and does not necessarily mean that it will never be improved. She would not mind if access were limited to Bailey Hill Road, a major arterial. She noted that the council is attempting to provide affordable housing and that is why this should be approved. Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to place special emphasis on Site Review Procedure #5, Exhibit "B" of the ordinance, for safe and efficient ingress, egress, and on-site traffic cir- culation which uses Mistletoe Street only for emergency vehicular traffic. Mr. Farah indicated that this wi" not be going back to the Planning Commission. Roll call vote on the amendment; motion carried unanimously with Mr. Lieuallen abstaining. Roll call vote on the amended motion; motion carried unanimously, with Mr. Lieuallen abstaining. Council Bill 2183 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be e approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all coun- cilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and - - - dn umbered 18689. C. Public Works Bid Awards (tabulation attached)--Mr. Henry stated that all blds are belng recommended wlth the exception of Bid Number 7, speed devices on Augusta Street, which is not being recommended at this time since there will be a hearing on this matter later. Don Gilman, Public Works, said that these bids consist of 17 projects, the bids for which were opened on August 5 and August 7. The bid summaries were distributed with the recommendation to award to the appropriate bidders in each case. Six bids would be at City cost, three were petitions by the property owners, and seven were regarding subdivision development. They would recommend awarding all except for Project 2 of Bid Number 7, speed devices on Augusta Street. This is in the Laurel Hill neighborhood and it is a Community Development project. It would narrow the street from 36 feet to 24 feet. There is one protest on this project and a hearing is scheduled for September 8, 1980. Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to award all the low bids and sign the contracts with the exception of project e 2 of bid number 7, speed devices on Augusta Street. 8/11/80--5 Ms. Miller asked why the cost to the City is higher than the amount of the contract. Mr. Gilman responded that this includes the e~gi- neering costs. e Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. II. ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING A. Property located south of 30th Avenue, east of Spring Boulevard at Dogwood Drive and Kimberly Drive, from County AGT Agricultural, Grazing, Timber-Raising District to City RA Suburban Residential District and from County AGT Agricultural, Grazing, Timber-Raising District to City'RA/PD Suburban Residential District with Planned Unit Development procedures (City of Eugene: Firland Heights) (Z 80-12) (map distributed). Mr. Henry stated that this item had been held over for one month. At the council's request, a tour of the area was made. This property had been annexed but not converted from county to city zoning. He intro- duced Jerry Jacobson, Planning, to provide background information. Mr. Jacobson stated this is a city-initiated zone change for property which never received city zoning after annexation in 1976. On July 14, the zoning matter was heard and tabled to allow a tour and to receive information from the County regarding the 30th Avenue interchange. This information has been distributed to the council. The earliest possible construction date for this interchange would be 1983-84. e - .- ..- ----,- , Ms. Smith asked how this coincides with development of the property. Mr. Jacobson stated that the property would be developed in three phases with the earliest occurring possibly in 1982. The majority of the development on the property would take place in 1983-84. Ms. Smith noted that the interchange would not accommodate traffic during construction, but it would after that. Mr. Jacobson indicated agreement with her statement. Ms. Schue stated that she had missed the public hearing and would abstain from the item. CB 2171--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT Agricultural, Grazing, Timber- Raising District to City RA Suburban Residential District for property located south of 30th Avenue, east of Spring Boulevard at Dogwood Drive and Kimberly Drive. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that findings sup- porting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 3, 1980, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unan- imously with Ms. Schue abstaining. Council Bi 11 2171 was read the second time by counc il b i 11 number - only. 8/11/80--6 . Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors ,present voting aye, with Ms. Schue abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18690. CB 2172--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT Agricultural, Grazing, Timber-Raising District to City RA/PD Suburban Residential District with Planned Unit Development procedures for property located south of 30th Avenue, east of Spring Boulevard at Dogwood Drive and Kimberly Drive. Ms. Smith moved" seconded by Mr. L ieuallen, that findings sup- porting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of June 3, 1980, be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously with Ms. Schue abstaining. Council Bill 2172 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, and Ms. Schue abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18691. e III. REPORT FROM ENERGY CONSERVATION POLICY BOARD--STAFF PRESENTATION (memo and report distributed) Mr. Henry indicated that there are two motions to be acted upon, one to refer the board's recommendations to establish weatherization standards for existing residences to the City Attorney's office to be heard as an ordinance in October; the second motion is to forward recommendations regarding solar access and land use to the Planning Commission with a high priority within the revisions to the zoning ordinance. Mr. Henry stated there are several proposals which the Policy Board believes should be retained by the City Council until a later time. These recommendations include: a) The establishment of an electrical space heating connection service charge where natural gas is available--this charge could be reduced for certified energy-efficient residences; (b) The development of energy-efficient standards as a requirement of new electrical hookups where natural gas is available; and (c) The development of measures which would lead to the eventual prohibition of electrical space heating hook- ups where natural gas is available. e 8/11/80--7 ------ - Mr. Henry introduced Gretchen Miller, chairperson of the Energy Conser- vation Policy Board, and Greg Page, Technology Coordinator, City Manager's office, to provide background information. e Ms. Miller stated that the memo describes the recommendations of the Board. She noted that Camilla Pratt and Adrienne Lannom, Planning Com- missioners, and members of the Energy Conservation Policy Board, are available to answer questions. As the proposals come back to the council in October, they will need to anticipate how the Northwest Regional Power Bill will affect Eugene. If it fails, it is unknown what will happen with -EWEB's loan program to implement weatherization. Mr. Page stated that in the past six months the Energy Conservation Policy Board has developed a series of proposals. The board should be given credit for imagination and ability to adapt. When the work first began, there was large participation by the banks and community in the State's 6-1/2 percent loan program. With rising interest costs, this is no longer so available. If EWEB is successful through the test case in the court, and the bond sale, this would provide $20 to $40 million to this area without requiring Federal or State assistance. These would be matching grants, and the loans would be deferred for payment until the time of sale of the residence. Weatherization requirements in existing residences will be effective January 1, 1985. Prior to that time, strong educat ional programs wi 11 be developed by the City and EWEB, emphas i zing economic reasons for voluntary implementation of weatherization and what the consequences will be if they are not implemented. By 1990, most residences would be weatherized, which is when load shortages are pro- jected. Eugene's proposal is different from Portland's in the following e ways: a) it does not affect the sale of the property; b) the proposal will include financing without appeal to State or Federal governments; c) it will apply only to residential residences up to four-plexes; and d) there is utility certification. There is also an appeals process for on-site variances or through the City's appeals process. The cost for enforcement would be incurred by EWEB, not the City. On the emergency fuel energy shortage contingency planning, they are working with the Federal Department of Transportation and Department of Energy. They are also developing a solar efficiency manual. They are sending out information in the Parks Department Fall Leisure Schedule and received permission from Garry Trudeau to use some of the Doonesbury cartoons as part of this information. Ms. Miller stated that she would like to make it clear that these ideas are being referred to the Planning Commission and Planning Department and that they are being referred with a high priority. Mr. Obie noted that these are just referrals at this time for the public to properly respond. It will be more effective to get proposals back from the attorneys and then get public input. Ms. Smith noted that it is easy to refer, but the council has no way of knowing when these would come back; she asked if it would be this year. Mr. Farah responded that many items are coming in as high priority, and he could give them a definite time in about a week. Ms. Smith asked if this is perceived as a high priority with the Planning Department. Mr. Farah responded that it is high priority with both the Planning Commission and the Planning Department. . 8/11/80--8 . Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to refer the board's recommendations to establish weatherization standards for existing residences to the City Attorney's office for ordinance preparation. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Ms. Smith moved, seconded by Mr. Lieuallen, to forward recommen- dations regarding solar access and land use to the Planning Commission with a high priority within the revisions to the zoning ordinance. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Mayor Keller indicated that action on the nominations for the CETA advisory groups would be taken on Wednesday, August 13, 1980. The meeting was adjourned to August 13, 1980. Respectfully submitted, ~ ~~ Charles T. Henry City Manager e (Recorded by Lynda Nelson) CTH:LN:slb/CM23b18 e 8/11/80--9 . , . ' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division Bid No. 6 -- Opened: August 5 & 7, 1980 1. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within Okita Subdivision; and sanitary sewer within 160 feet of the east boundary of Okita Subdivision (Job 1548) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD l. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ 74,371.75 $ 73,889.60 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ -0- $ 79,545.52 3. Wildish Construction Co.----------------------$ 82,201.91 $ 81,170.61 4. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----------------$ 84,809.20 $ 84,866.28 5. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.----------------------$ 88,318.48 $ -0- Cost to' Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 94,600.00 ) 28' Pav. $ 31.10/FF San. Lat. $ 0.09/SF None None San.Serv. $ 310.00(Each Stm.Swr. $ 980.00/Lot 5" Conc. $ 2.10/SF COMPLETION DATE: October 31, 1980 --lIt------------~------------------------------------------------------------------------,----------. 2. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent, to Isabelle Plat (Job #1779) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD 1. Wi1dish Construction Co.----------------------$ 115,943.09 $ 116,612.20 2. Kenneth R. Bostick Const. Co.-----------------$ 118,446.10 $ -0- 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ 121,346.05 $ -0- 4. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ 126,734.85 $ 127,727.95 5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor~ Inc.----------------$ 127,129.10 $ 130,178.65 6. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.----------------------$ 135,655.36 $ -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 144,700.00 ) 441 Pav. $ 45.80/FF Storm Sewer $ 1,500.00 $ 2,500.00 (332) San. Lat. $ O.06/SF San.Serv. $ 480.00/Each Stm.Swr. $1330.00(Lot COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1980 --~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 5 ) , 3. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent to Laura's Subdivision (Job #1738) Contract Cost AJPD Bidders: Basic Alternate 1. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.--------------~-------$ 25,572.30 $ -0- 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ 26,070.85 $ -0- 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ 28,419.75 $ 30,062.60 4. Wildish Construction Co.-----------~----------$ 30,561.25 $ 33,803.52 Cost to Abutting Property: Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 32,750.00 ) 281 Paving $ 34.00/FF None None Stonn Sewer $ 220.00/Lot COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1980 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e - - - 4. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within and adjacent to Raindrop Ridge Subdivision (Job #1774) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD. 1. Wi1dish Construction Co.----------------------$ 32,022.89 $ 31,448.29 2. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.----------------------$ 33,579.10 $ -0- 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ 35,627.24 $ -0- 4. Harry B. Stanley Const.-----------------------$ 38,900.60 $ 36,664.60 5. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ 38,562.50 $ -0- 6. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.----------------$ 40,159.29 $ 41,337.92 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 40,800.00 ) 28 ' Pa v . $ 36.50/FF None None San. Lat. $ 0.20/SF San.Serv. $ 300.00/Each Stm. Swr. $ 0.09/S.F. e COMPLETION DATE: October 31, 1980 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 2 of 5 , 5. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within Sweetbr;ar 2nd Addition; and sanitary sewer to ser~e area within 160 feet of the north, south and east boundaries of Sweetbriar 2nd Addition e (Job #1720) \ Contract Cost . ---. B; dders: ~ Basic Alternate AWARD . l. Wildish. Construction Co.------~-------------$ 82.057.95 $ 81,804.96 2. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.---------~----------$ 87,313.55 $ -0- - - - 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-----~------------$ -0- $ 87,566.00 4. Harry B. Stanley Construction---------------$ 97,058.10 $ 91,975.30 5. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------------$ 92,667.15 $ -0- 6. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.--------------$ 94,437.62 $ 94,156.42 7. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------$ 95,763.70 $ 94,878.30 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 102,200.00 ) 28' Pav. $ 47.30/FF None None San.Lat. $ 0.18/SF San.Serv. $ 190.00/ Each Stm.Swr. $1,100.00/Lot COMPLETION DATE: October 31, 1980 ._______~____________~~~________~___________________________________________________________Jlt___. 6. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER within Sundial Plat. (Job #1673) Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.----------------$ 128.670.25 2. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.---------------$ 135,184.75 3. Dean Crane Construction ---------------------$ 136,633.10 4. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.---------------------$ 145,313.19 5. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------------$ 149,619.09 6. \~i 1 di sh Constructi on Co. ---------------------$ 153,558.75 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to Ci ty Amount Budgeted ( $ 161,100.00 ) None None 281 Pav. $ 45.00/FF San. Lat. $ 0.14/SF San.Serv. $ 375.00/Each Stm. Swr. $ 930.00/Lot COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1981 e --------.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 3 of 5 7. PAVING AND STORM SEWER in Hickory Lane from Sweetgum Lane to Garden Way. (Job #1852) Contract Cost e Bidders: Basic Alternate I AWARD 1. Wildish Construction Co.----------------------$ 41,175.78 $ 42,293.49 2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ -0- $ 41,453.60 3. Egge's Sand & Gravel .Co.----------------------$ 42,429.90 $ -0- 4. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ 43,689.20 $ -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 45,900.00 ) 28' Pa v . $ 29.70/FF Storm Sewer $ 5,400.00 $ 5,400.00 (332) 61 Pav. $ 10.20/FF San.Serv. $ 410.00/Each 411 Conc. $ 2.40/SF 511 Conc. $ 2.45/SF COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1980 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- e8. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND PEDESTRIAN WAY within and adjacent to LaCasa Estates Subdivision (Job #1379) Contract Cost Bi dders: Basic Alternate AWARD 1- Wi1dish Construction Co.---------------------$ 270,328.64 $ 282,548.10 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------------$ -0- $ 290,018.21 3. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.---------------------$ 299,986.05 $ -0- 4. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.----------------$ 302,266.00 $ 300,758.00 5. Kenneth R. Bostick Const. Co.--------!..-------$ 303,717.54 $ -0- 6. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.---------------$ 314,010.80 $ 319,594.18 7. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-------------------$ 328,919.75 $ -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 325,200.00 ) 28' Pav. $ 27.70/FF None None San.Lat $ 0.14/SF San.Serv. $ 230.00/Each Stm.Swr. $ 630.00/Lot Ped.Way $ 30.00/Lot e COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1981 .------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 4 of 5 - 9. PAVING Augusta Street from 26th Avenue to South City Limits; and 26th Avenue from Riverview Street to Augusta Street. (Job #469) Contract Cost e Bidders: Basic Alternate AWARD 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.--------------------$ 85,230.37 $ -0- 2. Wildish Construction Co.----------------------$ -0- $ 88,404.75 3. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.----------------------$ 86,964.95 $ -0- 4. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.--------------------$ 94,491.05 $ -O- S. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.-----------------$ 97,453.60 $ -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted ( $ 95,800.00 ) $ 11,000. 00 Parks Dept. $ 11,000.00 (332) 281 Pav. $ 33.00/FF San.Swr. $ 3,820.00/Lot #100 Stm.Swr. $10,500.00/Lot #200 5" Cone. $ 2.60/SF t COMPLETION DATE: October 31, 1980 .-------- -------- --------------- - ---------- ------- - --- ------ - - -- -- - --.--- -- ------- - -- -- ---.-- ---... ..,.- - -. 10. STORM SEWER Wi11hi Street from Taney e Street to Jay Street (Job #1878) Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD 1. Kenneth R. Bostick Const. Co.-------------------$ 20,139.40 . 2. Greensuns' Inc.---------------------------------$ 21,037.50 3. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.----------------------$ 22,223.00 4. Wi1dish Construction Co.------------------------$ 23,245.50 5. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.------------------$ 23,310.70 6. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.------------------------$ 24,730.00 7. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.----------------------$ 24,791.85 8. Emerald Excavating, Inc.------------------------$ 27,391.76 9. L. D. Van Over Construction, Inc.---------------$ 29,262.50 10. Harry B. Stanley Construction-------------------$ 45,090.00 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted - None $ 22,150.00 $ 32,500.00 (531 ) e COMPLETION DATE: October 15, 1980 .--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----' Page 5 of 5 e DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division I Bid No. 7 Opened: August 5, 1980 l. TRAFFIC DIVERTERS on 12th Avenue at intersection of Polk Street and Monroe Street (Job #1881/1882) Bidders: Contract Cost AWARD l. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.-------------- $ 8,252.00 2. Wi1dish Construction Co.-------------- $ 9,038.20 3. Tarhee1 Asphalt & Paving-------------- $ 9,249.20 4. Morse Bras, Contractors, Inc.--------- $ 9,568.20 5. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------ $ 12,812.50 6. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------ $ 12,926.40 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted None $ 9,075.00 $ 9,100.00 (171) e COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1980 ----------------------------------------------------------------------_._-------------------------- 2. 'SPEED DEVICES at various locations on Augusta Street (Job #1697) Bidders: I Contract Cost AWARD 1. Tarheel Asphalt & Paving---------------$ 8,868.00 2. Eugene Sand & Gravel, lnc.-------------$ 9,946.08 3. Wildish Construction Co.---------------$ 13,811.50 4. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-------------$ 14,551.00 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted None $ 9,750.00 $ 8,741.00 (171 ) e COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1980 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~--, Page 1 of 1 " DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division Bid No. ~U9Ust 7, 19' ) Opened: 1. PAVING REPAIR - Kincaid Street from 11th Avenue to 13th Avenue (Job. #1872-1 ) Bidders: Contract Cost ..-- .- AWARD l. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.---------------$ 33,408.10 2. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.----------$ 34,904.85 3. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------$ 36,033.95 4. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-------------$39,562.50 5. Wi1dish Construction Co.---------------$ 42,237.50 Cost to Abutting Property Cost.to City Amount Budgeted None $ 35,080.00 $ 33,950.00 (311 ) COMPLETION DATE: October 1,1980 -----------------------------~---------------------------------------------------------------~~--- 2. PAVING REPAIR - 8th Avenue from Monroe Street to tviadi son Street. (Job #1872-2) Bidders: Contract Cost e AWARD 1. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.-------------$ 38,108.08 2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.-------------$ 47,314.60 3. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc~----------$ 47,991.60 4. Wi1dish Construction Co.---------------$ 49,950.00 5. Egge's Sand & Gravel Co.---------------$ 52,115.64 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted None $ 40,000.00 $ 40,300.00 ( 311) COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1980 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------~~---- 3. PAVING REPAIR - Slurry Seals -Various Locations (Job #1872-3) Bidders: Contract:Cost AWARD 1. -Interstate Slurry Seal, Inc.----------- $ 17 ,557 .26 2. Asphalt Maintenance ,International------ $ 19,451.69 Cost to Abutting Property Cost to City Amount Budgeted e None $ 18,450.00 $ 22,000.00 ( 311) COMPLETION DATE: October 1, 1980 Paqe 1 of 1 . ~ It DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS \ , Engineering Division Bid No. 9 Opened: August 7, 1980 1. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER Paving and storm sewer on 7th Avenue from Seneca Road to Bai 1 ey Hill Road; stonn sewer on Bailey Hill Road from 7th Avenue to 5th Avenue; and .sanitary sewer to serve the area between 5th Avenue and 7th Avenue from Seneca Road to Bailey Hill Road. (Job #1849) Contract Cost Bidders: Basic Alternate AvJARD 1. Morse Bros. Contractors, Inc.---------------$ 227,517.35 $ -0- 2. Dan D. Allsup Contractor, Inc.--------------$ 227,955.43 $ 242,972.51 3. Wildish Construction Co.--------------------$ 230,980.69 $ -0- 4. Eugene Sand & Gravel, Inc.------------------$ 234,393.36 $ -O- S. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc.------------------$ 238,025.72 $ -0- 6. H & J Construction--------------------------$ 248,114.88 $ -0- e 7. Egge's Sand & GravelCo.--------------------$ 249,788.48 $ -0- Cost to Abutting Property Cost to, City Amount Budgeted l $ 253,150.00 } 44' Pav. $ 45.50/FF Storm Sewer $ 34,000.00 $ 35,000.00 (332) San. Lat. $ 0.08/SF San.Serv. $ 4S0.00/Each Stm. Swr. $40,500.00/Lot #1100 Parcel A & B I Stm.Serv. $28,OOO.00/Lot #2900 COMPLETION DATE: October 10, 1980 ----------------------.----------------------------------------------------------------------------. e Page 1 of 1