Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/29/1981 Meeting .' M I NUT E S e Eugene City Council City Council Chamber July 29, 1981 11:30 a.m. COUNCILORS PRESENT: Gretchen Miller, Brian Obie, Betty Smith, Mark Lindberg, D. W. Hamel, Eric Haws, Cynthia Wooten, and Emily Schue. Adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller. I. ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL, APPOINTMENTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS, AGENDA ADJUSTMENTS A. Presentation of Award Mayor Keller presented the annual Municipal Finance Officer's Association of the United States and Canada Award for Fiscal Year 1980-81 to Bill McGuire, Finance Director. He thanked Mr. McGuire for his contributions and congratulated him. B. Report from Local Electric Energy Committee e Ms. Wooten stated that the acting mayor had appointed her to the Local Electric Energy Committee. She attended a meeting, and they consolidated a grant appli- cation for local jurisdictions, including public and private utilities. These proposals will be submitted August 14, 1981. She would like authorization for two additional proposals which would benefit the City of Eugene. The first proposal would entail determining the economic and energy consequences of a municipal ordinance regulating electrical energy use in new residential and commercial structures. The second would be to complete a city-wide solar resource assessment, which will develop a data base showing the monthly and annual amount of solar energy falling on existing houses and buildings which could be used for space heating, water heating, and electrical generation, and to determine appropriate techniques for protecting access to solar energy for existing residences and businesses. These proposals were developed by Oregon Appropriate Technology in consultation with Greg Page, City Technology Coordi- nator, and will be subcontracted to OAT. These two grants would total $75,000. L-COG supports these two developmental proposals. She asked for council concur- rence in submittal of these applications to BPA and noted that she would con- tinue to update and brief the council. She also noted that individual grant proposals can be submitted to Bonneville Power Authority for the City. Mr. Obie noted that he would like this matter referred to Greg Page to receive a more formal staff presentation. Ms. Wooten stated that this must be reviewed now as the application deadline is August 14. She apologized for the short notice, but felt they should be submitted. Mr. Gleason added that on August 14, formal submittal of the applications must be done. The council could withdraw, e at the time of the award, after a more complete review if that was its desire. MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 1 ----- Ms. Wooten stated that these are strong proposals but the City could choose not e to accept these even if they were awarded. Ms. Schue added that the L-COG board has not taken a specific position but the L-COG board is supportive of the committee, although they have not supported these specific proposals in their request. Ms. Wooten clarified that the L-COG staff is in support, although there has been no official position from the board. Ms. Miller asked what the regional total of the award would be. Mr. Page stated it would be $500,000. L-COG is submitting a grant on its own, and these appli- cations will be separate. Ms. Miller stated she feels that staff should proceed with these applications and council can get more information later. She said that this will not be the City's major effort for conservation as these funds are intended for research and small target projects. There should be substan- tially more money later. Mr. Page responded that the City is trying to receive grant funds for two ideas which seem to make sense. Ms. Smith added that the council could request that more information be sent to them. Ms. Wooten added that these projects will be subcontracted. Ms. Smith stated she would like information on the funding situation along with other information. Mr. Page responded that he would provide this to the council. Mr. Obie suggested holding this item over and placing it on the August 12, 1981, agenda. Council consensus was to do this. C. Boundary Commission Ms. Wooten stated that the Boundary Commission Advisory Committee is considering a budget supported by fees and assessments of local jurisdictions. They will be meeting again Friday, July 31. She would like the council to authorize the e City's commitment to the committee of the assessments as outlined in order to maintain the Lane County Boundary Commission. Mr. Gleason stated that these funds would have to come out of contingency. He would recommend that this should be done. Failure to authorize the budget would mean there would be no budget for the Boundary Commission; therefore, no Boundary Commission. Ms. Wooten noted that she had voted to support the Boundary Commission yesterday and the assessments will be voted on Friday. She has asked the City Manager to look at alternate proposals for fees and assess- ments so that the issue of taxation might be alleviated. Mayor Keller noted agreement with Ms. Wooten's support of the Boundary Commission. Ms. Smith added that the council had taken an official position on this item through the Legis- lative Subcommittee. It is critical to retain the Boundary Commission. Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt and confirm the council's willingness to spend $18,750 in support of the Boundary Commission with a representative being authorized to forward council's position on this matter. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Mr. Gleason indicated that staff would come back with a formal resolution transferring the money. - MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 2 D. L-COG Survey e Ms. Schue stated that the L-COG survey form is due to Elaine Stewart, Acting Council Assistant. E. Improperly Parked Cars Mr. Obie stated that he is concerned about cars that are being parked illegally on private property. Signs have not been present or not very visible. He is concerned when towing companies are being predatory. He would like proper notice and signing to be required and to have this included in the ordinance review. Mr. Gleason said a report would be brought back. F. Airport Solicitation Memo Ms. Miller stated that the Airport Solicitation memo of June 14, 1981, regarding handbills, etc., seems to be unconstitutional. She would like to know more about the process. Mr. Gleason indicated a staff report would be brought back. G. Appointmel'-lts Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to appoint Pat Vallerand to the Citizen Involvement Committee for a term expiring June 30, 1984; to appoint Jean Names to the Eugene Commission on the Rights of Women to fill the unexpired term ending January 1, 1982, Arlene Platt as first alternate to the Eugene Commission on the Rights of Women, and Gail Wiemann for second alternate to the Eugene Commis- e sion on the Rights of Women; and to appoint Sarah Chandler to the Metropolitan Area Plan Advisory Committee position for the term expiring June 30, 1984. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ordinance Adopting the 1979 Uniform Fire Code (memo and ordinance distributed) Mr. Gleason stated that most of the revisions are administrative with some changes in inspection. He indicated that Dick Christensen, Fire, is available to answer questions. Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. CB 2342--An ordinance adopting the Western Fire Chiefs and International Conference of Building Officials' Uniform Fire Code with certain modifications, additions, and deletions, amending Sections 8.190, 8.195, and 8.200 and deleting Section 8.203 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 3 Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent e of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2342 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18843. B. Easement Vacation for Halvorson/Bennett (EV 81-3) (map distributed) Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. CB 2343--An ordinance authorizing vacation of a 14-foot-wide public utility easement located south of Royal Avenue on the west side of Driftwood Drive. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2343 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved e and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18844. C. Easement Vacation for Vernon Cooper (EV 81-4) (map distributed) ~ Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. CB 2344-An ordinance authorizing vacation of seven feet of a 14-foot drainage easement adjacent to the north property line and the entire 14-foot drainage easement adjacent to the east of the property line of property located on the northeast corner of Larkspur Avenue and Tabor Street, west of Norkenzie. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2344 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18845. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 4 D. 1981 Restoration Loan Applications for Historic Landmarks Funded e With City Moneys (memo and additional information distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced Judith Rees, HCC. Ms. Rees stated that on July 16, 1981, the Historic Review Board reviewed nine applications for restoration loans for historic landmarks. The board unani- mously agreed that five applications be recommended to the council for approval and the other four were unanimously approved for funding with CDBG moneys. The recommendations are as follows: the owners of Bennett House, 240 High Street, are recommended to receive $2,220 on a ten-year loan with an interest rate of nine percent; the owners of Fairmount Presbyterian Church, 1910 East 15th Avenue (Maude Kerns), be loaned $10,000 for ten years at nine percent; the Tiffany Building owner be loaned $10,000 to restore mezzanine windows, for ten years at nine percent; the owner of link House and Barn, 221 East 3rd Avenue, is recom- mended to receive $10,000 to reroof and repair exterior detailing on the house and provide structural repairs to the barn including the roof and floor for a ten-year loan at nine percent; and the owners of apartments at 235 East 2nd Avenue be loaned $7,765 on a ten-year loan at nine percent. The apartments are not significant, but there are moneys available for funding this request based on the guidelines for restoration of "other" structures within a historic 1 andmark area. She indicated that Deirdre Malarkey, Historic Review Board, was available to answer additional questions. Mr. Hamel asked about the ATO house on Oak between 11th and 12th. Ms. Rees stated that was not one of the 15 applications that had been submitted. An application must be submitted by an owner or long-term lessee and there are e legal problems with the ownership. Public hearing was opened; there being no testimony, public hearing was closed. Res. No. 3557--A resolution authorizing a secured loan for restoration of Bennett House (ESB). Ms. Mill er moved, seconded by Mr. Ob i e, to adopt the reso 1 ut i on. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 3558--A resolution authorizing a secured loan for restoration of the Fairmount Presbyterian Church. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 3559--A resolution authorizing a secured loan for restoration of the Tiffany Building. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council ,Jul y 29, 1981 Page 5 ----- Res. No. 3560--A resolution authorizing a secured loan for restoration e of the Zink House and Barn (ESB). Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 3561--A resolution authorizing a secured loan for restoration of 235 East 2nd (ESB). Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. III. 2,4-0 USE BY PUBLIC AGENCIES WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF EUGENE--STAFF RESPONSE TO COUNCIL INQUIRY (memo distributed) Mr. Gleason stated that staff is available to answer questions, but the memo is self-explanatory. Ms. Wooten appreciated the information and indicated that it is a good report. In regard to School District 4-J, paragraph 4 of the memo, she asked if Tim Rhay could tell how many applications they will make this year in the 37 locations. She is encouraged by the progress in the parks program for integrated pest management, but is concerned about the cumulative effect on people who are exposed to even small dosages of toxic herbicides. While EPA has registered 2,4-0, many tests are being redone and no one knows the long-term impact. In the short term, some children and adults are extremely sensitive. She is e preparing independent research to give to the council in the fall regarding the possibility of banning the use of 2,4-0 within the city limits. Other alternatives could possibly be pursued at that time. Mr. Lindberg feels that integrated pest management seems like the best program in Eugene. In the future, he would like to encourage other jurisdictions to use similar programs. 4-J has allowed volunteers to pull the weeds instead of using pesticides. He asked if it would be possible for this to be done in parks. Tim Rhay, Parks Maintenance, stated that that is occurring in at least one neighborhood already. With integrated pest management, no applications are made where there is no infestation so that would preclude the use of 2,4-0. There is a question as to whether hand removal of weeds is effective. Mr. Lindberg asked what th~ effect is of exposure to alternative chemicals and what would be used if 2,4-0 would be el iminated. He stated that comparison would be helpful. Ms. Miller indicated that she appreciates the effort that the Parks Department has made and would like to see further reduction in use of these chemicals, especially 2,4-0. She will be looking forward to seeing further council discussions and action later. It is important to recognize that the Parks Department has been taking steps in the last few years. She would like to know if the program of spraying, especially in play areas, includes advance notice to warn citizens. Mayor Keller noted that Duane Hatch, Lane County Extension Agent, has requested an opportunity to speak. Council concurrence was to allow him to speak. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 6 Mr. Hatch stated that there are probably no materials more respected than 2,4-0, and it was easier to get people involved with rumors than with facts. The facts e are available from each point of view. His children have not been harmed by this innocuous weed killer, and he does not feel it is poisonous. Danger is related to exposure and dosages received. The use is being reduced with alternatives, and he is not sure manual control is effective in weedy turf. He would rather not be in the vicinity of parks with weeds. He is not sure that the majority of Eugene citizens dislike the use of 2,4-0. He hopes the council will make a decision based on input from knowledgeable experts on both sides. He read an article from Dow Chemical on 2,4-0. He said he does not feel that the producer of the brochure would cause its accuracy to be any less just because they also manufacture the substance. Ms. Wooten stated she did not believe a debate on the merits of use of herbicides is appropriate. She does not think this controversy will be resolved within her lifetime. If the council chooses to err, it should be on the side of health and safety. Mr. Gleason added that one item in Tier II is equipment to maintain healthy turf without use of chemicals. IV. CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE SELECTION PROCESS (memo, ordinance distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced Sandra Franklint Municipal Court. Ms. Franklin stated that her presentation is in response to the request for more information of alternative selection processes for municipal judges. Several options are available. For selection, the council could choose to have: a - bar poll, applications from interested candidates, or nominations of eligible attorneys by the councilors, and any of these could be handled through a screening process of the Mayor, the council, or staff. By charter, the council may appoint judges by terms and at salaries it specifies. In regard to terms, the options include: specific terms of office; a continuing appointment termi- nable without cause, or a continuing appointment with periodic formal reviews. Several Oregon cities were contacted regarding their methods of judicial selec- tion and retention. Performance appraisal methods vary from city to city, with most of them being informal. The council was provided with a tabulation of the results of the contacts by staff. There are many possible systems by which judges are selected, appointed, and reviewed, but there is limited comparability to Eugene's situation. Mr. Obie stated that he would like the department heads' and judges' opinions on the proposed ordinance. Ms. Franklin responded that this would change the current system and could cause it to be more political than it is now. Also, it would limit the council's options somewhat. Judge Bocci, Municipal Judge, stated that he does not understand the purpose of this proposed amendment. The current system, although allowing the same judge to continue, provides the City with good service. The City's municipal court is reknowned throughout the state. He cannot understand how this ordinance would give the council any greater authority than it now has. The council can discharge a judge now with or without cause. If this is to be a mechanism for performance review, then the council could have a committee look specifically at that issue. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 7 Ms. Smith stated that at her request, other options have been presented. The - comments being made that would cause this to be more political would not be good. Judge Bocci stated that the current ordinance serves the purpose well and he would support a review process. The council has the authority it needs in the current system. Judge Bocci agreed that the council has the authority to discharge. Ms. Smith asked if he had talked with other judges in the court systems. Judge Bocci stated that he had talked to those in Municipal Court, and they share his views 100 percent. He has not specially contacted other judges in the area, but comments in the past from other court systems have also been favorable. Ms. Smith stated that she is not willing to support the ordinance as now presented. It could be revised or modified for a compromise. Ms. Mill er indicated she would be happy to serve on a task force to do this. She will not support renewing the present contract until this is done. She has been working on this project since spring of 1980. The memo she sent to the council June 30, 1981, summarized the areas to be changed. First, the council hires the Muni- cipal Judge and the City Manager. They have daily contact with the City Manager, but not with the Municipal Judge. Most of the council do not receive input on judges' performances unless there is a complaint. This review should come before the council on a regular schedule. The Manager oversees all other departments, and the council has not been exercising its authority. She woul d like to see an automatic review procedure implemented. Second, she has a strong suspicion and belief that more is being paid than necessary for judicial ser- vices. It is difficult to compare with other cities. The only way to find out is to open this job up for bids to see what people will do it for. The Municipal Judge position is challenging, but not the most challenging job around. Much of it is routine, with some difficult problems occasionally. Many people would like the opportunity for a job like that. She thinks it is pos- e sible that some people would do it for less money and be as qualified and as competent. It is different paying an hourly rate for municipal services than it is in an attorney's office, where they have their own office and support staff costs. The council should decide what it expects, the qualifications that are necessary, and see what happens. The system now has automatic rate increases. A system needs to be developed and until these goals are accomplished, she is not willing to renew the contract. Mr. Haws stated that he agrees this is a good idea. He does not have anything to do with the current system, but would like to see the system put in writing. The current system may restrict the council. He personally does not care what the Lane County Bar thinks and would like to make his own decision. He is not sure how this limits the council's ability and would like more clarification. Judge Bocci stated that the council now has unlimited authority and this ordi- nance would tie the council to someone for four years as well as to the selec- tion process. He agrees it should not be a popularity contest. Mr. Haws asked about the limiting aspect of the ordinance. Ms. Miller stated it might be good to go through this procedure every four to six years and, in the interim, applicants could serve at the pleasure of the council. The ordinance gives greater flexibility with regard to the Lane County Bar. Now, the council must pick from the top three of the bar poll. Mr. Haws said nothing has been done in the six years he has been on the council. He does not agree with taking e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 8 the top three listed on the bar poll necessarily, but perhaps the poll's results could be taken as advisory. He feels the bar should pay for the poll if they e want one done and provide the information to the council. Ms. Schue asked when the current contract expiration date is. Ms. Miller explained that the contract expired June 30, 1981. Ms. Schue agreed that more oversight would be good. She suggested forming a subcommittee. Mr. Hamel stated that six-and-one-half years ago, the council went through this when Councilor Bradley brought it up. Judge Bocci has been in that position for a long time, and much inflation has occurred. Any judgment should be based on his performance, not his salary. He has heard nothing derogatory about the current judge. He stated that he is not in a position to make that judgment. He suggested leaving the process as it is for now, but feels the circumstances could be changed. Mr. Obie stated that Ms. Miller has been working on this very hard and there is sufficient variance of opinion to warrant another subcommittee. He is not com- fortable with the bar poll. He has a concern that this would become a popu- larity poll. He believes Ms. Miller's review and her arguments are good. He asked if others in the judicial system could be included for the review process. He would prefer that the current contract be renewed and work be done on the ordinance. According to what he has heard, these concerns are not being done in criticism of the current job being done; but if they are, that should be brought up as well. Ms. Wooten stated this is not a reflection on the current judge, but she does e agree with Ms. Miller and will not support renewal of the contract until this is done. Ms. Schue indicated agreement, and said it could be accomplished within a month. The council is talking about a system, not a person. She would support this being done before consideration of renewal of the contract. Ms. Miller has been working on this for over a year. She would like to see the item brought back after review. Ms. Miller indicated agreement that it could be done in a month. Last year's contract was not signed until December. Mr. Haws noted that previously, there was a judicial committee consisting of Mr. Haws, Mr. Hamel, lawyers, and citizens. Keith Martin, City Attorney, stated that the contract would remain in effect until it is changed. Ms. Smith noted it would be helpful to have an attorney from the outside on the committee. Mr. Haws indicated he would be willing to let Ms. Miller serve in his place this time. Mr. Gleason stated he is not sure that citizens should be on the committee. Mayor Keller suggested that a subcommittee consisting of himself, Ms. Miller, and Mr. Obie be formed. He would like to bring this item back in four weeks. Council agreed. v. CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION FOR SEPTEMBER 15, 1981 (memos distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced Warren Wong, Management Services. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 9 Mr. Wong stated that Resolution No. 3562 would refer Measure 51 to the voters of e Eugene authorizing the City to levy an excess of 1981-82 charter tax limit general property taxes of $1,161,464 for 1981-82, and Resolution No. 3563 would refer Measure 52 to the legal voters authorizing the levying of a property tax of $652,273 for acquisition of Gillespie Butte. Res. No. 3562--A resolution referring Measure No. 51 to the legal voters of the City of Eugene authorizing the City to levy in excess of 1981-82 charter tax limit general property taxes of $1,161,464 for 1981-82. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 3563--A resolution referring Measure No. 52 to the legal voters of the City of Eugene authorizing the levying of a property tax of $652,273 for acquisition of the Gillespie Butte property. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, to adopt the resolution. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. CB 2346--An ordinance ordering a special election to be conducted by the Lane County Election Department on the 15th day of September, 1981, for the purpose of submitting to the legal electors of the City of Eugene two measures authorizing property tax levies outside the 1981-82 charter limit for general City operations e and capital projects during FY 1981-82: (1) $1,161,464 for general operations and capital projects; and (2) $652,273 for transfer to park use of the Gillespie Butte property held by the Eugene Water & Electric Board; adopting polling places and providing for all acts necessary for the carrying on of said election; and declaring an emergency. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2346 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18847. VI. AMENDMENT TO LIMOUSINE ORDINANCE (memo, ordinance distributed) CB 2345--An ordinance concerning limousine drivers; amending Section 3.010 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 10 - Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent e of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2345 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18846. VII. ORDINANCE RELATING TO MINOR LIQUOR/MARIJUANA POSSESSION (memo, ordinance distributed) Mr. Gleason introduced Jim Packard, Chief of Police. Chief Packard stated that concern has been expressed about an introduction of new laws and that is not the case with this ordinance. This is just an economic and administrative change for the benefit of the City. These are laws already enforced by the Eugene Police Department. Due to District Court's difficulty in scheduling, officers have had to appear on their days off, which has caused problems for staff in calculating days off, as well as causing budget problems. Sometimes, violations have been split between Municipal and District courts. Now, all the money on these violations is paid to District Court with about 50 percent of the money coming back to the City, but staff is not sure the City is receiving accurate revenues. The attempt is to save the City some money. This e would increase revenues to the City from the fines imposed, reduce the frequency of times an officer is required to cite a person into both Municipal and District courts resulting from the same arrest, and reduce the amount of police overtime because of better coordination and scheduling of Municipal Court. This would not prohibit any behavior that is not already prohibited by State law; it would merely enable the Police Department to cite violators into Municipal Court rather than into District Court. Mr. Hamel asked for clarification in the ordinance as to whether possession of marijuana laws would affect only those under 21. Mr. Packard stated that the minor in possession of alcohol laws would affect only those under 21, but the possession of marijuana laws would affect everyone. Ms. Miller stated that she would not vote for this ordinance if it were for activities not already prohibited by State law. This does not change the activities of the Police Department, just which court the violators go to. If the statutes are changed by the State legislature, then the City should follow suit. Chief Packard stated that that is the intent. There is already a City ordinance dealing with minors in possession of alcohol. CB 2347--An ordinance concerning possession of liquor by persons under 21 years of age and the use or possession of less than one ounce of marijuana; amending Sections 4.115 and 4.990 of the Eugene Code, 1971; adding a new Section 4.240 to that code; and declaring an emergency. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 11 _ r c:;p . Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent e of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Council Bill 2347 was read the second time by council bill number only. Ms. Miller moved, seconded by Mr. Obie, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 18848. Mayor Keller noted that at 7:30 p.m., August 6, the judicial committee will meet and clarification of the assessment process with the council is following this meeting. The meeting was adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Micheal D.. Gleason City Manager - (Recorded by Lynda Nelson) MDG:LN:db/CM26b1 e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 29, 1981 Page 12