The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About10152018 Transit Tomorrow Report PPTTransit Tomorrow i, Eugene City Council Worksession October 15, 2018 What is Transit Tomorrow? Transit Tomorrow is LTD's effort to find out how we can better move the people we serve to the destinations that are important to them. Covering a three-year span, the plan will serve as the foundation for LTD's Long-term planning cycle Current Levels of Transit Access Reiiidents Jobs Access to Transit What Qt thl� m}etr4 drta h} "IMer a buip route? ■Eywy 10 m 1 ■ E,:try 20 No 6 Every 604 ■ NO ACV= . niirmIis m rkom4 mhwbes rrew-mr*1t}NLN%h?"d4 ?'FL YrLm tip,- I•7Ip, +1i 00 What percentage c'f LTD district's disadvantaged papulation is near a bus route? ■Every 10 m 15 ■ Even 20 3a 60 ■ Ereryr 6D+ � Nb Access Miv%OM rriinw*t rw�qnuw M in4Tity Residents Low Income Reesidents Sentor Residents (65+yc -saldq 7-Bfo Vehide l` w:5chvlda Tgrm- $3,000 n x. Ir.•;r s ,t>•'. -n ate;', ;n=` 7n i�rr�, 4ncL inrw, MTA4- 61,0" l Oc 3D% dC,56 5U% 69% 70:Z� EO% 90 10D,% IOIAL. -SUM deo- 1 or% 2796 30% 40% 50% 7D% Be% 40% 1 DD% Dou SYnfii: GTShdrttl�207k-ACS 2CM&&Yrw f+;+rON ToT•%A- 11,006 0 13 IT L. 13 0 Pedestrian Network Analysis Task How We Design Transit 1. RidersMp Network The Ridership / Coverage Trade-off. mz� Activity PI Target Engagement PRE Engagement: Community Values Survey Stakeholder Forum #1 Online Interactive Survey (Online Open House) Community Presentations Community Listening Sessions Tabling & Community Events 40-80 Attending 200-400 Respondents 40-100 Members (Project Overall) 10 Events (Project Ove ra 11) Overview (Phase 1): Total 639 participants 89 Invitations 66 RSVP 52 Attended 668 Respondents Over 152 Participants 24 Participants (this phase) 8 Tabling Events More than 125 engaged/responses 1,659 Lane Transit District — Survey Says: • Regarding ridership/coverage tradeoffs: • Frequency vs. Coverage: A clear majority more interested in frequency • especially true of frequent transit riders and metro area residents. • Shorter Waits vs. Shorter Walks: More prefer shorter waits • reverse is true for seniors and people with disabilities. • Regarding priorities for service investments: • Weekend, evening, and frequent daytime service: highest priorities for increased weekend, increased evening service, and more frequent daytime service. • Added weekend and evening service especially high priority for frequent transit riders, and low-income respondents. • Service to more places in the metro area is a higher priority for infrequent and non -riders, but also seniors and people with disabilities. o i FRf'a�(',rcy —�5 — Ridership Concept - Longer walks to service, Shorter waits for service o� J n 1 ` Coverage Concept - Shorter walks to service, •■ Longer waits for service Transit Tomorrow's Four Scenarios Service Increases Fa re Programs Focus of Service Longer walk- RidershipI Coverage Shorter walk - Shorter Wait Longer Wait The green dot represents LTD's current position — approximately 60% of LTD's service is R ' focused on Ridership, and 40% on Coverage. The extensive Group Pass Program managed by LTD is � what puts the dot in the Fare Programs quadrant. Four scenarios have been developed to help make decisions on two key questions: First, what is the best way to structure the region's transit network — should it focus on higher frequency with longer walks or transit service that is lower frequency, but shorter walks? Second, what priority should be put on new revenue for transit — should it be used to increase service (frequency and late night/weekend service) or reduce the cost of fares for people using transit? Lane Transit District — Balancing Priorities • Board considering Implementation of a youth pass • Potential service increases related to Implementation of COA • Capital needs related to: • vehicle purchases, • fare management technology, • Mobility on Demand pilot being considered Project Process & Community Input Establish Technical Review Refine System LTD Board Community Analysis Alternatives Alternatives Decision Priorities Summer- Mid -Winter Early Spring Late Spring Summer2018 Fa112018 2019 2019 2019 COMMUNITYINPUT Interactive Survey V Listening Sessions e e e ItiTr Stakeholder Forum Analyze community input 0 Design alternatives for the transit system COMMUNITYINPUT JEL Interactive Survey V Listening Sessions 0 0 tiTr Stakeholder Forum Analyze communitylnput Refine transit systemdesign options R Declslonmade leadingto transit system improvements beginning In 2020