HomeMy WebLinkAboutAMENDED Agenda Packet 11-26-18 MeetingNovember 26, 2018, Meeting
AMENDED AGENDA
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
November 26, 2018
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING and MEETING OF THE
EUGENE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
Meeting of November 26, 2018;
Her Honor Mayor Lucy Vinis Presiding
Councilors Mike Clark, President Betty Taylor, Vice President Greg Evans Chris Pryor Emily Semple Claire Syrett Jennifer Yeh Alan Zelenka
Note: This agenda has been amended to reflect the addition of Item 5.
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING and MEETING OF THE
EUGENE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
1. CEREMONIAL MATTERS
2. PUBLIC FORUM
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of City Council Minutes
B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda
C. Reappointment to Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission
4. ACTION: Ordinance and Resolutions Adopting the Transportation System
Development Charge Methodology
5. ACTION: Amendment of Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Butterfly Lot
November 26, 2018, Meeting
The Eugene City Council welcomes your interest in these agenda items. This meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours' notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation will also be provided with 48 hours' notice. To arrange for these services, contact the receptionist at 541-682-5010. City Council meetings are telecast live on Metro Television, Comcast channel 21, and rebroadcast later in the week. El consejo de la Ciudad de Eugene agradece su interés en estos asuntos de la agenda. El lugar de la reunión tiene acceso para sillas de ruedas. Se puede proveer a un intérprete para las personas con discapacidad auditiva si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. También se puede proveer interpretación para español si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. Para reservar estos servicios llame al 541-682-5010. Las reuniones del consejo de la ciudad se transmiten en vivo por Metro Television, Canal 21 de Comcast y son retransmitidas durante la semana.
For more information, contact the Council Coordinator at 541-682-5010, or visit us online at www.eugene-or.gov.
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 1
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Ceremonial Matters Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 1 Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This item is to acknowledge awards and achievements and inform the public of proclamations signed by the Mayor. No action is required by the City Council.
BACKGROUND At its 1997 fall process session, the council agreed to include a monthly agenda item entitled "Ceremonial Matters." From time to time, the Mayor is asked to sign proclamations or acknowledge awards received, which serve to encourage and educate the community about important issues and events.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION This is an information item only.
ATTACHMENTS None.
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 2
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Public Forum Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 2 Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This segment allows citizens the opportunity to express opinions and provide information to the council. Testimony presented during the Public Forum should be on City-related issues and should not address items which have already been heard by a Hearings Official or are on the present agenda as a public hearing item.
SUGGESTED MOTION No action is required; this is an informational item only.
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3A
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Approval of City Council Minutes Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 3A Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This is a routine item to approve City Council minutes.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to approve the minutes for the October 22 and 31, 2018, work sessions as well as the November 13, 2018, work session and meeting.
ATTACHMENTS A. October 22, 2018, Work Session Minutes B. October 31, 2018, Work Session Minutes C. November 13, 2018, Work Session Minutes D. November 13, 2018, Meeting Minutes
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 22, 2018 Page 1
Work Session
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council and Eugene Urban Renewal Agency
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
October 22, 2018
5:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor Mayor Vinis opened the October 22, 2018, Work Session of the Eugene City Council.
1.Committee Reports and Items of InterestCouncil Discussion
•Attended meeting of Oregon Transportation Commission as representative from Lane AreaCommission on Transportation; opportunity for all local transportation commissions toprovide feedback to the OTC. LACT communicated that local jurisdictions understand theirtransportation infrastructure needs best and should be making prioritization decisions.
•Announced plans to introduce a resolution opposing Ballot Measure 105, which wouldrepeal Oregon’s decades-old sanctuary state law.
•Security cameras have been installed downtown; consider signage that alerts people totheir use by Eugene Police Department.
•Protest camp is growing; requested and received an additional port-a-potty.
•Chamber of Commerce hosted its annual Business Expo; very well-attended and providedimportant networking opportunity for local businesses and City services.
•Attended re-dedication ceremony for Richardson Bridge affordable housing community;oldest affordable housing project in Oregon and first Eugene landbank development. Withhelp from City programs, facility was rehabilitated and enhanced.
•Concerned that work session on Inclusionary Zoning has not been scheduled yet;opportunities being lost as new development occurs.
•Council receiving feedback from constituents on recent decision to grant a Multiple UnitProperty Tax Exemption for the proposed Obie development. Many are frustrated that therewas limited opportunity for public education and input.
•As incentive, consider freezing property taxes for 10 years for those property owners whowish to annex to the City.
•The topic of Inclusionary Zoning will be addressed during council’s upcoming work sessionon Housing Tools and Strategies.
Mayor Vinis adjourned the City Council meeting and opened a meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal
Agency.
2.WORK SESSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Downtown Riverfront UpdatePlanning and Development Director Denny Braud, City Engineer Mark Schoening and PrincipalLandscape Architect Emily Proudfoot gave a presentation on the progress of the riverfrontredevelopment efforts, including infrastructure and park features.
ATTACHMENT A
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 22, 2018 Page 2
Work Session
Council Discussion
•Level of public participation on this issue not surprising; community has an enormous stakein how the property is developed and used. The river is a unifying element.
•EWEB Board intends to address the disposition of its headquarters at an upcoming meeting;the City will have 30 days from the date of EWEB’s declaration of surplus to request negotiations for the property and then five years to complete the negotiations.
•The community will want the council to have a discussion about whether to pursuepurchase of the EWEB building.
•Proposed development addresses all of the input received about pedestrian access,greenspace, playground, water features, affordable housing, etc.
•The inclusion of natural gas infrastructure should be carefully considered in light ofincreasing energy around climate goals.
•There is community support for including multiple and diverse food options in site plans.
•The location of the proposed development will have its own overlay plan so codeamendments will affect that site only. Current concept plan will be reconfigured as site-specific decisions are made.
•As proposed, every parcel of development will address its own parking needs andrequirements.
•Council’s direction to increase the number of affordable housing units may be accomplishedin a number of ways, including adding to building height and width.
•The proposed For Rent apartment buildings would be eligible for a MUPTE; the affordablehousing development and fee-simple ownership townhomes would not; council shoulddecide ahead of time if it is willing to grant a MUPTE.
•Consideration should be given to view shed issues affecting neighboring properties andbusinesses.
•Projected costs of next steps in development still being negotiated as part of projectagreement with Williams and Dame.
•Most important change to MUPTE criteria was to ensure that more housing will be built thatis affordable to working residents; reasonable to consider now whether MUPTE should beused in this case.
MOTION AND VOTE: Agency President Clark, seconded by Agency Vice President Taylor,
moved to direct the Agency Director to explore options on expanding the number of
affordable housing units and possible public parking and bring back design options on
anticipated costs and proposed public investment. PASSED 8:0.
Mayor Vinis adjourned the Urban Renewal Agency meeting and reconvened the City Council meeting.
3.ACTION: Downtown Riverfront Local Improvement District
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to order the
local improvements to be made and direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and
specifications for the improvements and to call for bids on the construction contract.
PASSED 8:0.
4.UPDATE AND POSSIBLE ACTION: Temporary Day Center and Dusk-to-Dawn PilotCity Manager Jon Ruiz read a prepared statement about the growing crisis many in thecommunity are facing around housing and homelessness, and the City’s efforts, in partnershipwith the County, to identify and implement effective and humane steps that can be taken toaddress this issue.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 22, 2018 Page 3
Work Session
Assistant City Manager Kristie Hammitt and City Manager’s Office Division Manager Becky DeWitt introduced a proposal to create an overnight safe sleeping location and day center on a portion of the former City Hall block. Council Discussion
•The proposed camping site is dependent on finding a private service provider willing tooperate the site; staff is working to identify the organization that will take on responsibility for the day-to-day operations.
•Although the site will use a “low barrier” threshold for admittance, alcohol and drug use willbe prohibited.
•City funds will be spent to establish and run the proposed site, using modular infrastructurethat can be used at another location; important to apprise council of the costs along the way.
•Proposal is a reaction rather than a plan to address downtown issues; the City enablingthose without shelter to sleep outdoors. Efforts should be made towards creating a safe, indoor structure.
•Good temporary site, good plan, and good approach to a difficult issue; appropriateemphasis placed on coordinated entry and case management.
•Providing an alternative to sleeping on the streets is a good temporary measure.
•The budget for the proposed site is still being developed; staff will continue to look for amore permanent solution and will engage the County in a conversation about sharing someof the expenses.
•Recognize that the proposal is not the ideal solution; it is a good interim step thatacknowledges the challenges of approaching winter weather.
•Efforts should be made to ensure the model is successful and ultimately replicable at othersites.
•The site must be visually attractive; important to ensure community support andconfidence.
•Goal in creating the facility should be that it doesn’t attract negative attention.
•Staff is working to get the site up and running as quickly as possible, while beingappropriately cautious and deliberate to ensure its success.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Evans, moved to extend by
10 minutes. PASSED 8:0.
•Because the site is still City-owned property, it’s important to be assured that the site willbe safe and secure. If public health or public safety risk is identified, the City Manager isauthorized to shut the site down immediately.
•Acknowledge that this is a temporary plan to protect vulnerable people from the elementswhile longer-term shelter is created.
•Appreciate consideration of dog owners at day center; encourage staff to consider ways toaccommodate dog owners at dusk-to-dawn camp.
•Need to have a plan in place to deal with possibility that demand will greatly exceedavailability.
•Those who are currently camping at the Butterfly lot site cannot be forced to move to analternative site.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to authorize the
City Manager to move forward with piloting a temporary day center and dusk-to-dawn site on
a portion of the City Hall block. PASSED 7:1, Councilor Clark opposed.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 22, 2018 Page 4
Work Session
The meeting adjourned at 7:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted,
Beth Forrest City Recorder
Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 31, 2018 Page 1
Work Session
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
October 31, 2018
12:00 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Jennifer Yeh, Claire Syrett, Alan Zelenka, Greg Evans, Mike Clark (via phone until 12:20 p.m.)
Councilors Absent: Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor Mayor Vinis opened the October 31, 2018, Work Session of the Eugene City Council.
1.DISCUSSION: County Proposed Partnership - Highway 99 Temporary SiteCity Manager Jon Ruiz outlined the proposal from Lane County to partner with the City ofEugene in the establishment of a temporary dusk-to-dawn camping site on Highway 99.Council Discussion
•The actions recently taken by Lane County and City of Eugene staff were prompted bythe 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Martin v Boise.
•Proposed site is a good alternative with a lower impact on the community; considercreating a pedestrian crossing across Highway 99 if that portion of road comes intoCity’s jurisdiction.
•Support partnership with County and concept in general; however, the proposal won’tsolve the issues downtown.
•The pursuit of a downtown facility that provides needed services for the homelessshould still be a priority.
•Since the proposed camp is low barrier, there is some concern about the concentrationof people with serious mental health and substance abuse issues.
•Small, incremental steps will make a difference in the long run.
•The Highway 99 site will provide a number of services for those who stay there;recently approved public safety bridge funding will be used in part for downtownfacilities and efforts.
•Local service providers have limited capacity and may not be able to support multipleday center locations; proposed site can remain open indefinitely, until suitablealternatives are available.
•The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision will still stand, regardless of actions taken bycouncil and Lane County.
•Access to showers is needed in any location.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Syrett, in lieu of City
Council’s October 22 motion, move to direct the City Manager to work with Lane County
and other service providers to enhance the case management and other services that are
provided to the homeless on Lane County’s property and on nearby properties, and to
move forward with piloting a day center in the downtown area. PASSED 5:0.
ATTACHMENT B
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council October 31, 2018 Page 2
Work Session
2.WORK SESSION: Human Rights Commission FY2019 Work Plan and FY2018 Annual ReportHuman Rights and Equity Analyst Katie Babits and Human Rights Commissioner Ela Kubokpresented highlights from the commission’s FY2019 Work Plan and FY2018 Annual Report.Council Discussion
•The council greatly appreciates the efforts of the volunteer commissioners and support staff.
•The work of the commission is difficult and critically important to the well-being of thecommunity.
•The Marginalized Voices report is excellent; format and content of other commissionreports is very effective.
•More frequent contact between the commission and City Council is needed.
•Current events and political atmosphere make reports on hate and bias crimes essential.
•Community members are more concerned than ever about personal safety; proactivemeasures to promote zero tolerance for hate speech and actions needed.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to approve
the Human Rights Commission FY2019 work plan. PASSED: 5:0.
3.WORK SESSION: Annual Report from Police CommissionPolice Commission Chair Bill Whalen and Vice Chair Scott Nowicki presented the PoliceCommission’s Annual Report.Council Discussion
•Work of the commission is critically important; the group has re-engaged around its coremission and is making progress on key issues such as the department’s taser and excessiveforce policies.
•The Police Commission provides a way for the community to be involved in developing,reviewing, and changing policies around police services.
•The format of the annual report is helpful to readers.The meeting adjourned at 1:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted,
Beth Forrest City Recorder
Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 13, 2018 Page 1
Work Session
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
November 13, 2018
5:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor Mayor Vinis opened the November 13, 2018, Work Session of the Eugene City Council.
1.Committee Reports and Items of Interest
•Protesters have returned to Butterfly Lot; recent efforts aren’t adequate and this is aproblem that will not go away.
•Important to work toward a future where all those without housing have access to shelter,food and sanitary facilities – these are basic human rights and these are our fellowcommunity members.
•Disappointed in decision to stop plans for a day center in former City Hall lot.
•Still need more places downtown for people to sit and rest.
•Complaint received about speeding on McLean Boulevard.
•Consider using Rental Housing fees collected to perform regular inspections of propertiesfor deficiencies.
•Kudos to Police Chief Chris Skinner for process that has resulted in full staffing for first timein many years.
•Community Veterans Day events were well-attended and an appropriate way to honor ourlocal veterans.
•Council Evans was elected to the board of directors of the National League of Cities andappointed to a 20-member national task force on housing. Focus will be on best practicesand lobbying Housing and Urban Development to reverse some its positions that havenegatively impacted cities.
•Third meeting of the Housing Tools and Strategies work group will meet on November 14.
•Both the Poverty and Homelessness Board and the Shelter and Supported HousingSubcommittee will address very specific next steps for providing homeless services.
2.WORK SESSION: Town Square UpdatePlanning and Development Director Denny Braud, and Planner Will Dowdy gave a presentationon the progress of the Town Square efforts, including infrastructure and park features.Council Discussion
•Proposed City Hall plans account for Phase 1 only, with other City offices continuing to rentspace in other building downtown.
•Questions asked about how the rents paid for leased space are being captured, relative tothe costs projected for building a new City Hall on the Butterfly lot.
•Consider totality of costs vs incremental costs moving forward.
•Consider incorporating residential and/or commercial development into plans for FarmersMarket, to maximize use of the land, streams of revenue and housing stock.
ATTACHMENT C
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council November 13, 2018 Page 2
Work Session
•Goal should be a project that community is proud of, making public assembly space apriority. Then, locate staff in downtown to meet basic needs at a minimal cost.
•The values for this project were identified in 2016; may be time to revisit these values asthe latest proposals are being considered.
•The reports received from EWEB and the consultants contradict each other; council still hasnot received enough information to make an educated comparison.
•More information on plans for the Parks Blocks needed.
•The 2016 report was completed by local experts and contains credible information.
•Question asked about the strategy the City will use to re-orient properties around the ParksBlocks so they face inward.
•Important to be proactive; consider closing Oak Street to reconnect the Park Blocks.
•The success of this initiative will depend on the availability of mixed-use opportunities.
•Rely on public/private partnerships, incentives and other tools; public involvement processmust incorporate commercial and residential considerations.
•Questions asked about how the town square concept connects with the development of 8thAvenue as a “Great Street.”The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted,
Beth Forrest City Recorder
Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Meeting November 13, 2018 Page 1
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
November 13, 2018
7:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pyror Mayor Vinis opened the November 13, 2018, meeting of the Eugene City Council.
1.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAGMayor Vinis read an excerpt from a recent Presidential proclamation recognizing Veterans Day.James G. Miller led the meeting attendees in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
2.PUBLIC FORUM1.Bob Cassidy – proposed consideration of a ballot measure on the purchase of EWEB for a City Hall.2.Otto Poticha – spoke in support of the City pursuing the purchase of the EWEB building.3.Donna Riddle – spoke in support of increased effort to provide shelter for the unhoused.4.Lee DeVeau – spoke in support of increased effort to provide shelter for the unhoused.5.Art Farley – spoke on behalf of Sustainability Commission in support of a ban on plastics.6.Jeanne-Marie Moore – spoke about safety issues related to the homeless camp.7.Cindy Allen – raised concern about EWEB’s use of smart meters.8.Victor Odlivak – raised concern about EWEB’s use of smart meters.9.Patricia Hine – spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.10.Deb McGee – spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.11.Jim Neu - spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.12.Betzi Hitz - spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.13.Linda Heyl - spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.14.Leonard Higgins - spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.15.Pamela Krause – spoke in support of increased efforts to help the homeless.16.John Ammondson – supported a proposed ban on single-use plastics.17.Serena Orsinger – supported a proposed ban on single-use plastics.18.Abe Luedtke – supported a proposed ban on non-recyclable materials.19.Ian Curtis - spoke in support of more aggressive implementation of the Climate Action Plan.20.Hanna Haro – supported a proposed ban on single-use plastics.21.Alden McWayne – supported a proposed ban on single-use plastics.22.Michael Gannon – supported increased efforts to make progress on climate recovery goals.23.David Strahan – supported self-management of homeless camps; opposed use of plastics.24.Kris McAllister – spoke about the need for a safe place for those who are unwell to receive services.25.Bill Sullivan – supported a new look at the need for a City Hall; consider use of the EWEB building.26.Michael Carrigan – supported the establishment of a variety of smaller, safe homeless shelters.27.Otis Haschemeyer – said the council should focus on more pressing issues than tax breaks.28.Zondie Zinke – said the council should focus on more pressing issues than tax breaks.29.John Abbe – supported an update of the Climate Action Plan that includes more urgency.30.“G” – spoke about her experience as a refugee for the California fires and the need for services31.Gary Heldt – supported the use of the EWEB building for City Hall.32.Eric Jackson – discussed the impacts of policies that criminalize homelessness.33.Bill Randall – thanked the council and staff for their service to the community.
ATTACHMENT D
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Meeting November 13, 2018 Page 2
Council Discussion
•An earlier motion to place a referendum on the use of the EWEB building for City Hall failed.
•There are no mandated outcomes in the Climate Recovery Ordinance, only goals.
•Question asked whether other cities require fossil fuel reductions in order to renew afranchise agreement.
•The City’s efforts around climate recovery cannot succeed without help from advocates andlarge-lever stakeholders.
•Improvements to the pedestrian crossing at Hwy. 99 homeless camp site are needed.
3.CONSENT CALENDARA. Approval of City Council Minutesa. October 8, 2018, Meetingb. October 10, 2018, Joint Meeting of Eugene City Council and Lane County Board ofCommissionersc. October 15, 2018, Work Sessiond. October 22, 2018, Meetinge. October 24, 2018, Work Session
B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda C. Adoption of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Assessor’s Map 17-04-11-13, Tax Lot 1400—Located at 183 Ferndale Drive) (McGinley; A 18-5) D. Adoption of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Assessor’s Map 17-04-13-32, Tax Lot 5200 — Located on Owosso Drive) (City File: Day Joint Trust; A 18-6) E. Adoption of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Assessor’s Map 18-03-16-30, Tax Lot 100 — Located on Spring Boulevard)(City File: Margot Zallen Revocable Trust; A 18-7) F. Adoption of a Resolution Amending Resolution No. 5218 Concerning a Low-Income Rental Housing Property Tax Exemption Renewal for Property Located on Ross Lane and on Helen Street, Eugene, Oregon. (Applicant St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County, Inc.) G. Appointment of Civilian Review Board Representative to Police Commission
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar. PASSED 8:0
4. ACTION: An Ordinance Extending the Term of Ordinance No. 19775 and Ordinance No.
20397 Granting to Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. a Franchise for Operation of a Cable
Telecommunications System
MOTION and VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to adopt Council Bill 5199, an ordinance extending the term of Ordinance No. 19775 and Ordinance No. 20397 granting to Comcast of Oregon II Inc., a franchise for the operation of a cable telecommunications system. PASSED 8:0. 5.EWEB Property UpdateCity Attorney Kathryn Brotherton provided background about the council’s options related tothe disposition of the EWEB building.
MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to direct the City Manager to exercise the City’s authority under E.C 2.196 for the purpose of negotiating to acquire the property included in EWEB’s November 7, 2018, notice of surplus declaration. Council Discussion
•Question asked about the minimum council can do to ensure the property remains in publicownership.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Meeting November 13, 2018 Page 3
•Further discussion by council is needed; updated information required to ensure aninformed council decision.
•There is value in retaining the facility for public use; open to exploring a plan or proposal.
•The council has received equal testimony for and against using the site for City Hall.
•Lack of clarity has plagued the issue for years; any discussion should result in theidentification of real goals around public ownership and the City’s intentions for theproperty.
•Council should consider facilitating the building future use for a public purpose, like it didfor Civic Stadium property.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to postpone the vote on the motion until no later than November 28. FAILED 3:5, councilors Taylor, Syrett, and Evans in support.
•Postponing the vote on the main motion won’t facilitate the emergence of any new
information.
•EWEB is an iconic building; interested in exploring other possibilities for public use.
•There is strong public support for acquiring the property; important to maintain
option to have further discussions.
•Questions asked about the costs associated with moth-balling the site and the
possibility of converting the building to housing.
MOTION: Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to amend the motion to read “I move to direct the City Manager to exercise the City’s authority under E.C 2.196 for the purpose of negotiating to acquire, for non-City Hall purposes, the property included in EWEB’s November 7, 2018, notice of surplus declaration.
•Including language limiting the scope of what could be considered for the building doesn’tbind future councils; direction tonight should be purposefully broad to keep all optionsopen,
•Taking City Hall off the table is premature; question is only whether City should retain theoption to control what becomes of the building.
•Clarification made that the scope of the motion to not include City Hall refers only to Phase 1of the council’s plans.
•Motion gives City Manager direction on what to negotiate about; the City is currentlypursuing efforts to develop the town square proposal.
VOTE: PASSED 5:3, councilors Clark, Evans, and Semple opposed. VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED: PASSED 8:0. The meeting adjourned at 9:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted,
Beth Forrest City Recorder Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 3A
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3B
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Approval of Tentative Working Agenda Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 3B Department: City Manager’s Office Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This is a routine item to approve City Council Tentative Working Agenda.
BACKGROUND On July 31, 2000, the City Council held a process session and discussed the Operating Agreements. Section 2, notes in part that “The City Manager shall recommend monthly to the council which items should be placed on the council agenda. This recommendation shall be placed on the consent calendar at the regular City Council meetings (regular meetings are those meetings held on the second and fourth Monday of each month in the Council Chamber). If the recommendation contained in the consent calendar is approved, the items shall be brought before the council on a future agenda. If there are concerns about an item, the item may be pulled from the consent calendar at the request of any councilor or the Mayor. A vote shall occur to determine if the item should be included as future council business.” Scheduling of this item is in accordance with the Council Operating Agreements.
RELATED CITY POLICIES There are no policy issues related to this item.
COUNCIL OPTIONS The council may choose to approve, amend or not approve the tentative agenda.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has no recommendation on this item.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to approve the items on the Tentative Working Agenda.
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3B
ATTACHMENTS A. Tentative Working Agenda
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
Work Session Action Public Hearing Public Forum Consent Calendar
Committee Reports/Items of Interest Ceremonial Matters Pledge of Allegiance
Updated November 21, 2018
Meeting Location: Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue, unless otherwise noted
November 2018
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
26‐Nov Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
Clear and Objective Housing
Approval Criteria Update
(Work Session)
Rest Stop Siting Policy
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Jenessa Dragovich, PDD
Jason Dedrick, CS
7:30 pm
Ceremonial Matters
Public Forum
Appointment to Metropolitan
Wastewater Management
Commission
(Consent Calendar)
Transportation SDC Methodology
(Action)
Dave Breitenstein, PW
Dan Kaler, PW
Expected absences for 11/26: none
28‐Nov
Wednesday
12 pm
Nuisance Codes
(Work Session)
Recycling Update
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Mark Whitmill, PDD
Michael Wisth, PDD
Expected absences for 11/28: none
2
December 2018
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
10‐Dec Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
Housing Tools and Strategies
(Work Session)
90 mins
Mike Kinnison, PDD
Anne Fifield, PDD
7:30 pm
Ceremonial Matters
Public Forum
Resolution Approving LIRHPTE
for 11th and Lincoln
(Consent Calendar)
Resolution Acknowledging Receipt
of CAFR
(Consent Calendar)
URA‐Res. Acknowledging Receipt
of URA Annual Financial Report
(Action)
Supplemental Budget
(Public Hearing and Action)
URA Supplemental Budget
(Public Hearing and Action)
Update: Library Levy
Ellen Meyi‐Galloway,
PDD
Finn Cronin, CS
Finn Cronin, CS
Jamie Garner, CS
Jamie Garner, CS
Expected absences for 12/10: none
12‐Dec
Wednesday
12 pm
Emergency Operations Center
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Randi Bowers‐Payne,
CS
Expected absences for 12/12: Syrett
Council Break: December 13 – January 3
January 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
3‐Jan
Thursday
5:30 pm
State of the City
Expected absences for 1/3: none Soreng Theater, Hult Center
9‐Jan
Wednesday
12 pm
Home Energy Score
(Work Session)
Judicial Process
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
TBD
Keri Beraldo, CS
Expected absences for 1/9: none
3
14‐Jan Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
TBD
(Work Session)
7:30 pm
Public Forum
Resolution Annexing Land
Located at 435 Lindley Lane
(Sebring A 18‐9)
(Consent Calendar)
Approval of Funding and Use of
City Resources for Housing
Affordable to Low‐Income Persons
(Action)
Rodney Bohner, PDD
Ellen Meyi‐Galloway,
PDD
Expected absences for 1/14: none
16‐Jan
Wednesday
12 pm
Data Collection Policy/Protection
of Individuals and Groups
(Work Session)
Zone of Benefit/Reimbursement
District
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Jen Van Der Haeghan
Becky DeWitt, CS
Matt Rodriguez, PW
Expected absences for 1/16: none
5:30 pm
Joint City Council/Lane County
Commission – Homeless Services
Systems Analysis Report
(Work Session)
90 mins
Jason Dedrick, CS
22‐Jan Tuesday
7:30 pm
TBD
(Public Hearing)
Expected absences for 1/22: none
23‐Jan
Wednesday
12 pm
Highway 99/Bethel Urban
Renewal District
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Michael Kinnison, PDD
Expected absences for 1/23: none
26‐Jan
Saturday
9 am
Annual Goals Retreat
Expected absences for 1/26: none Location TBD
28‐Jan
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
Inclusionary Zoning
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
Stephanie Jennings,
PDD
7:30 pm
Public Forum
Expected absences for 1/28: none
4
30‐Jan
Wednesday
12 pm
Single Use Plastics Ban
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
Michael Wisth, PDD
Expected absences for 1/30: none
February 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
11‐Feb
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
7:30 pm
Public Forum
Expected absences for 2/11: none
13‐Feb
Wednesday
12 pm
Community Safety Revenue
Update
(Work Session)
90 mins
Kristie Hammitt, CS
Expected absences for 2/13: none
5:30 pm
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
19‐Feb Tuesday
7:30 pm
TBD
(Public Hearing)
Expected absences for 2/19: none
20‐Feb
Wednesday
12 pm
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
45 mins
Expected absences for 2/20: none
25‐Feb
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
Police Commission, Sustainability
Commission, Human Rights
Commission Updates
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
45 mins
7:30 pm
Public Forum
Expected absences for 2/25: Vinis
5
27‐Feb
Wednesday
12 pm
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
Expected absences for 2/27: Vinis
March 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
11‐Mar Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of
Interest
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
7:30 pm
Public Forum
Expected absences for 3/11: none
13‐Mar
Wednesday
12 pm
TBD
(Work Session)
TBD
(Work Session)
Expected absences for 3/13: none
Council Break: March 14 – April 8
Work Session Action Public Hearing Public Forum Consent Calendar
Committee Reports/Items of Interest Ceremonial Matters Pledge of Allegiance
Approved Work Session Polls to be Scheduled Councilor Date Approved
Hwy 99/Bethel Urban Renewal District – scheduled 1/23/19 Evans 11/9/17
Home Energy Score Policy – scheduled 1/9/19
Data Collection Policy/Protection of Individuals and Groups – scheduled 1/16/19
Single‐Use Plastics Ban – scheduled 1/30/19
Potential Regulation of Natural Gas in Eugene
Revisit City Code Regarding Alley Access Rules
Semple
Syrett
Semple
Semple
Semple
3/9/18
7/19/18
10/04/18
10/11/18
10/11/18
Follow‐Up Work Sessions to be Scheduled
$1 Million Shelter
Commercial Setbacks
Inclusionary Zoning – scheduled 1/28/19
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3C
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Reappointment to Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission
Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 3C Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Dave Breitenstein
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-8611
ISSUE STATEMENT This is an action item to reappoint one member to the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission to fill a citizen representative position. The current term for the position to be filled will expire on January 31, 2019.
BACKGROUND The purpose of the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission is to provide wastewater infrastructure and regional wastewater services on a unified basis for the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. The Commission consists of seven voting members, three of whom are appointed by the City of Eugene: one elected official and two citizen members. The Mayor appoints the elected official and nominates the citizen representatives for three-year terms. The City Council then votes on the Mayor's citizen nominations. The MWMC General Manager provided a letter of recommendation for Mr. Walt Meyer. Mr. Meyer has been an active and engaged member of the commission since 2010. The Mayor nominated Mr. Walt Meyer for reappointment.
RELATED CITY POLICIES The Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission serves as an advisory body to the City Council working under an intergovernmental agreement.
COUNCIL OPTIONS The City Council has the following options: 1. Appoint the applicant who has been nominated; 2. Appoint someone else; or 3. Seek additional candidates for the position.
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3C
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has no recommendation on this item; the appointment is made by the council.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS I move to reappoint Walt Meyer to the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission for a term beginning on February 1, 2019, and ending on January 31, 2022.
ATTACHMENTSA. Recommendation of MWMC General Manager B. List of Current MWMC Membership
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Dave Breitenstein Telephone: 541-682-8611 Staff E-Mail: DBreitenstein@eugene-or.gov
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
6
,
2
0
1
8
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
–
I
t
e
m
3
C
Current MWMC Commissioners
November 26, 2018
Peter Ruffier
MWMC President
Eugene citizen
Joe Pishioneri
Springfield City Council
Jennifer Yeh
Eugene City Council
Walt Meyer
Eugene citizen
Pat Farr
Lane County Commission
Bill Inge
Lane County citizen
Doug Keeler
MWMC Vice-President
Springfield citizen
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 3C
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 4
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Action: Ordinance and Resolutions Adopting the Transportation System Development Charge Methodology Meeting Date: November 26, 2018 Agenda Item Number: 4 Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Dan Kaler
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5216
ISSUE STATEMENT City Council is requested to adopt the proposed Transportation System Development Charge methodology. The adoption of the proposed TSDC methodology will require the following actions: a) Ordinance to amend City Code (specific sections of Chapter 7) b) Resolution to adopt the TSDC Project Plan c) Resolution to adopt the revised TSDC documents (General Methodology, Appendix A, B, and F) If adopted, the new TSDC methodology would be implemented on January 1, 2019.
BACKGROUND At the City Council work session on October 15, 2018, council directed the City Manager to bring back the proposed Transportation SDC package for council action with four changes. These changes were based on public comments and the concerns raised by the City Council at the Public Hearing on June 18, 2018. The City Council’s motions requested the following changes:
1) Impose the increase in TSDC rate in two steps, charging half the proposed increase for the first 12 months, then charging the full rate after 12 months.
2) Reduce the TSDC for accessory dwellings by 100 percent, including in areas where they are referred to as second single-family homes (800 square feet or less).
3) Establish an annual cap of $40,000 on the total amount of TSDCs waived for those accessory dwellings.
4) Establish an annual cap of $130,000 on the total amount of TSDCs waived under the City’s location-based, transit proximity, and transportation demand management incentives combined.
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 4
In response to the first motion, the proposed Resolution at Attachment C now includes a new Section 3 that imposes the increase in TSDC rate in two steps, charging half the proposed increase ($2,692.63/trip) from January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, then charging the full rate beginning on January 1, 2020. In response to the second motion, the proposed text in Section 4.4.4 of “Appendix B – TSDC Methodology” now includes the 100 percent reduction (see Exhibit A to the Resolution at Attachment C). The text in Section 4.4.4 uses the terminology recently adopted by the City Council in another ordinance, “...regardless of whether the structure is referred to as an ’accessory dwelling
unit’ or an additional ‘one-family dwelling’ on the same lot as another.” Staff recommends this language to ensure the SDC reduction would be available in all neighborhoods. The revisions take this approach, instead of referring to the 800 square foot standard for ADUs in the current land use code, to keep the TSDC reduction untethered from the Code’s ADU standards (including the 800 square foot standard), since the council intends to review the ADU standards in its upcoming Phase 2 work for ADUs. The change to a 100 percent reduction is also now reflected on Table B-10 in the Methodology Appendix B. In response to the third motion, the proposed text in Section 4.4.4 of “Appendix B – TSDC Methodology” now includes the $40,000 annual cap for accessory dwelling units. It also includes two administrative provisions that the council already includes in the SDC exemption pertaining to housing for low-income persons at EC 7.725: first providing for an administrative adjustment to the $40,000 cap when there is a change in the SDC rate for residential development and, second, directing that any unused portion of the $40,000 be included in the next year’s available reductions for ADUs. In response to the fourth motion, the proposed text in Section 7.3 of the “General Methodology” lists the $130,000 annual cap for the “location-based, transit proximity and transportation demand
management adjustments, combined.” The proposed text in Section 7.3 also includes the two administrative provisions described above. These changes to the proposed ordinance and resolutions are shown in legislative format in the attachments to this AIS. In addition, a few other changes have been shown in the attachments to show revisions that were needed for consistency with the council’s four motions and to reflect that the City Council recently replaced the term “secondary dwelling” with “accessory dwelling” throughout the City Code. Changes to address typos are not shown in legislative format.
RELATED CITY POLICIES Growth Management Policy 14, adopted by Resolution No. 4554, is directly related to implementation and modification of SDCs. The policy provides: Development shall be required to
pay the full cost of extending infrastructure and services, except that the City will examine ways to
subsidize the costs of providing infrastructure or offer other incentives that support higher-density,
in-fill, mixed-use, and redevelopment. Envision Eugene Pillars – Promote compact urban development and efficient transportation options.
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 4
Transportation System Plan – Goal 1 – Create an integrated transportation system that is safe and efficient; supports the Metro Plan’s land use diagram; Envision Eugene, a community vision for 2032 (2012), the City of Eugene’s target for a 50 percent reduction in fossil fuel consumption; and other City land use and economic development goals; reduces the reliance on single-occupancy automobiles; and enhances community livability.
COUNCIL OPTIONS The City Council may approve or not approve the adoption of the proposed ordinance and resolutions, in their current form or after making amendments.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager recommends adopting the ordinance and proposed resolutions in their current form.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to adopt Council Bill 5190 at Attachment A: An Ordinance Concerning System Development Charge Methodology; Amending Sections 7.710, 7.715, 7.720, 7.725, 7.730 and 7.735 of the Eugene Code, 1971 and Adding Section 7.732 to That Code. Move to adopt the proposed resolution at Attachment B: A Resolution Adopting the Transportation SDC Project Plan. Move to adopt the proposed resolution at Attachment C: A Resolution Adopting Amendments to the System Development Charge Methodologies (General Methodology and Appendices A, B and F) Originally Adopted by Resolution No. 4900.
ATTACHMENTS A. Proposed Ordinance Concerning System Development Charge Methodology; Amending Sections 7.710, 7.715, 7.720, 7.725, 7.730 and 7.735 of the Eugene Code, 1971 and Adding Section 7.732 to That Code. B. Proposed Resolution Adopting the Transportation SDC Project Plan.
• Includes Exhibit A: City of Eugene’s Transportation System Development Charge Project Plan. C. Proposed Resolution Adopting Amendments to the System Development Charge Methodologies (General Methodology and Appendices A, B and F) Originally Adopted by Resolution No. 4900. Includes:
• SDC General Methodology
• Appendix A – Definitions
November 26, 2018, Meeting – Item 4
• Appendix B – TSDC Methodology
• Appendix F – Formulas and General Fee Schedule
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Dan Kaler Telephone: 541-682-5216 Staff E-Mail: dkaler@eugene-or.gov
ORDINANCE NO. ________
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
METHODOLOGY; AMENDING SECTIONS 7.710, 7.715, 7.720, 7.725,
7.730 AND 7.735 OF THE EUGENE CODE, 1971; AND ADDING
SECTION 7.732 TO THAT CODE.
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 7.710(3) and 7.710(5) of the Eugene Code, 1971, are amended
to provide as follows:
7.710 SDC - Methodology.
(1) The methodology used to establish or modify a reimbursement fee shall
consider the cost of then-existing facilities, prior contributions by then-
existing users, gifts or grants from federal or state governments or
private persons, the value of unused capacity available to future system
users, rate-making principles employed to finance publicly owned
capital improvements, and other relevant factors identified by the
council. The methodology shall promote the objective that future
systems users shall contribute an equitable share of the cost of then-
existing facilities.
(2) The methodology used to establish or modify the public improvement
charge shall consider the cost of projected capital improvements
needed to increase the capacity of the systems to which the fee is
related and shall provide for a credit against the improvement fee for
the construction of any qualified public improvement.
(3) The methodology may also provide for a credit, reduction, or
adjustment as authorized in [sub]sections 7.730[(5)] to 7.732.
(4) Except when authorized in the methodology as provided in subsection
7.710(3), the fees required by this code which are assessed or
collected as part of a local improvement district or a charge in lieu of a
local improvement district assessment, or the cost of complying with
requirements or conditions imposed by a land use decision are
separate from and in addition to the systems development charge and
shall not be used as a credit against such charge. Nothing in this
subsection shall prevent the collection of a system development charge
in connection with a local improvement assessment or charge in lieu of
a local improvement district assessment.
(5) The methodologies for establishing the systems development charge
shall be established by resolution of the council and may be adopted
and amended concurrent with the establishment or revision of the
systems development charge. An amendment to a methodology that
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
changes [in] the amount of a reimbursement fee or an improvement fee
[is not a modification of the system development charge if the change in
amount is] based on the periodic application of an adopted specific cost
index or on a [modification to any of the factors related to rate that are
incorporated in the established methodology.] change in the costs of
materials, labor or real property applied to projects or project
capacity on a project list adopted pursuant to section 7.715(2) may
be adopted by [T]the city manager [may adopt changes to such a cost
index or rate factor] by administrative order pursuant to section 2.020 of
this code.
Section 2. Section 7.715(2) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.715 SDC - Compliance With State Law.
(1) The revenues received from the systems development charges shall be
budgeted and expended as provided by state law. The accounting of
such revenues and expenditures required by state law shall be included
in the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report required by ORS
chapter 294.
(2) The capital improvement plan required by state law as the basis for
expending systems development charge revenues for capital
improvements shall be the Eugene Capital Improvement[s Plan]
Program (CIP) and the comprehensive plan as adopted by the council
(Plan), the Transportation SDC Project Plan, other city facilities plans
that may include SDC-eligible capital projects, or the capital
improvement plan adopted by another governmental body which was
used by the city manager in establishing the methodology for the
systems development charge, provided such capital improvement plan
is consistent with the CIP, the Transportation SDC Project Plan, and
the Plan.
Section 3. Section 7.720(6) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended and a new
section 7.720(7) is added to provide as follows:
7.720 SDC - Collection of Charge.
(1) After adoption of the applicable methodology, a systems development
charge is payable upon issuance of:
(a) A building permit;
(b) A development permit for development not requiring the issuance
of a building permit; or
(c) A permit to connect to the water, wastewater sewer or stormwater
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
management facilities or in anticipation of the issuance of such a
permit at the time of levying a local improvement district
assessment for wastewater sewer or stormwater management
facility.
(2) If development is commenced without an appropriate permit or
connection is made to the water system, wastewater sewer system or
stormwater management facility without an appropriate permit, the
systems development charge is immediately payable upon the earliest
date that a permit was required.
(3) The city manager or the manager's designee shall collect the systems
development charges from the permittee. The city manager or the
manager's designee shall not issue any permit or allow connection
described in subsection 7.720(1) until the charge has been paid in full
or until provision for installment payments has been made within the
limits prescribed in subsection 7.190(2).
(4) Except as provided in this subsection, the obligation to pay the unpaid
systems development charge and interest thereon shall be secured by
a lien against the property upon which development is to occur. Such
liens shall arise upon issuance of the permit requiring the system
development charge and shall be entered on the city's lien docket and
the debt secured thereby may be collected in the same manner as
allowed by law for street improvement assessment liens. In lieu of such
lien, upon application of the permittee the obligation to pay the unpaid
systems development charge and interest thereon may be secured by
property, bond, deposits, letter of credit or other security acceptable to
the city manager or the manager's designee.
(5) When the obligation to pay the unpaid systems development charge is
imposed at the time of levying a local improvement district assessment
for wastewater sewer or of paying an equivalent assessment for
wastewater sewer and the obligation is secured by a lien against the
real property being developed, the person paying the systems
development charge in installments may apply for deferral of the
payments as provided in section 7.195.
(6) Except as provided in this subsection, SDC fees paid are not
refundable and, in the case of an agreement to pay SDCs in
installments, the terms of the agreement may not be modified. A partial
refund of SDC fees will be made or a modification of an installment
agreement will be allowed when an active development permit is
canceled or expires without being used, a change of design of an active
development permit is approved that results in a less intense use of the
property, or property previously developed as a manufactured home
park is partitioned and redeveloped. No portion of the administrative
[fees]charge will be refunded, and [an] additional [administrative
charge] review fees may be imposed to cover the cost of calculating
and processing the partial refund.
(7) The SDC methodology adopted under section 7.710 of this code
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
may require that a proposed development be reviewed by the city
in order to determine whether the proposed development will
result in an increase in the usage of any capital improvement or
will create the need for additional capital improvements.
Development that will have such an impact will be charged SDCs
and associated administrative charges. If this review determines
that the development will not have such an impact, then only a
review fee may be imposed for this review.
Section 4. Section 7.725 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.725 SDC - Exemptions. [The following are exempt from the systems
development charge imposed in section 7.705:]
(a1) Except for the systems development charge attributable to the
wastewater sewer system and the stormwater management facilities, all
development which existed or for which the city had received a
completed building permit application on or before June 30, 1991, or for
which a building permit was issued before that date, is exempt from
the systems development charge imposed in section 7.705.
[(b) Any conducting of a building or mining operation, or making of a
physical change in the use or appearance of a structure or which does
not increase the usage of any capital improvement or which does not
create the need for additional capital improvements. However, the SDC
methodology adopted under section 7.710 of this code may require that
a proposed development be reviewed by the city in order to determine
whether such an impact will be incurred. If this review occurs and it is
determined that there will be no increased usage of any capital
improvements and no additional capital improvements will be needed,
then an administrative charge shall be imposed for this review.]
(c2) Housing for low-income persons is exempt from the systems
development charge imposed in section 7.705, subject to the
following limitations:
(1a) Commencing with the 1998 fiscal year, and continuing each fiscal
year thereafter, the city manager or designee may waive a base
amount totaling $115,000 annually of system development
charges for housing for low-income persons.
(2b) Each fiscal year that there is a change in the rates for the system
development charges for residential development, the base
amount for that fiscal year shall be adjusted in an amount
proportionate to that change.
(3c) If any portion of the authorized base amount remains unallocated
at the end of a fiscal year, that portion shall be added to the
authorized base amount for the next fiscal year.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
(4d) In the event the property for which an exemption is granted
ceases to be utilized for housing for low-income persons or is sold
or transferred for use other than housing for low-income persons
within five years from the date the certificate of exemption is
recorded, the person to whom the exemption was granted shall be
required to pay to the city the amount of the exempted systems
development charges, plus interest at the statutory rate for
interest on a judgment from the date the certificate was recorded.
(5e) Upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the city shall record
the certificate of exemption documenting the date and amount of
the exemption with the Lane County Recorder’s office.
(6f) A transfer from an owner to whom an exemption was granted to
the initial lessee under a lease to purchase agreement shall not
be deemed a transfer of ownership for purposes of this
subsection.
(7g) The exemption authorized herein does not include an exemption
from the regional wastewater systems development charge.
(8h) For purposes of this subsection (c2), “low-income persons”
means:
1. With regard to rental housing, persons with an income at or
below 60 percent of the area median income as determined
by the State Housing Council based on information from the
United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development; and
2. With regard to home ownership housing and lease to
purchase home ownership housing, persons with an income
at or below 80 percent of the area median income as
determined by the State Housing Council based on
information from the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development.
Section 5. Section 7.730(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.730 SDC - Credits.
(1) As used in this section and in the definition of “Qualified public
improvements” in section 7.010, the word “contiguous” means: in a
public way which abuts.
(2) When development occurs which does not change the use of a building
in its entirety and which must pay a system development charge under
section 7.705 of this chapter, the system development charge for the
existing use(s) shall be calculated and if it is less than the system
development charge for the proposed use(s), the difference shall be the
system development charge. If the change in use results in the system
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
development charge for the proposed use being less than the system
development charge for the existing use, no system development
charge shall be required; however, no reimbursement or credit shall be
given and an administrative charge shall be imposed.
(3) When development occurs that demolishes an entire building or will
change the use(s) of a building in its entirety and which must pay a
system development charge under section 7.705 and/or an
administrative charge per the SDC methodology adopted under section
7.710 of this chapter, the system development charge for the previous
most intense verifiable use per system (i.e. parks, stormwater,
transportation, wastewater) shall be calculated and if it is less than the
system development charge for the proposed use, the difference shall
be the system development charge. If the change in use results in the
system development charge for the proposed use being less than the
system development charge for the previous most intense verifiable use
per system, no system development charge shall be required for that
system; however, no reimbursement or credit shall be given and an
administrative charge shall be imposed.
(4) A credit shall be given for the cost of a qualified public improvement
associated with a development. The credit provided for by this
subsection shall apply only to the improvement fee imposed for the type
of improvement being constructed, and shall not exceed the
improvement fee even if the cost of the capital improvement exceeds
the applicable improvement fee. Credit may be granted only for the
cost of that portion of such improvement that exceeds the government
unit’s minimum standard facility size or the capacity needed to serve
the particular development project or property.
(5) The methodology may provide for a credit against the public
improvement fee, the reimbursement fee, or both, for a capital
improvement constructed as part of the development that reduces the
development's demand upon existing capital improvements or the need
for future capital improvements or that would otherwise have to be
constructed at city expense under the then-existing council policies.
(6) Except to the extent that a capital improvement for which a credit is
given is part of the phasing of a larger project and that the credit
received against the systems development charge is greater than the
charge for the phase where the capital improvement is constructed,
credit shall not be transferable from one development to another.
(7) Credit shall not be transferable from one type of capital improvement to
another.
Section 6. Section 7.732 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is added to provide as follows:
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
7.732 SDC – Impact Reductions and Compact Development Adjustments.
(1) The methodologies may include provisions pertaining to a
reduction in a development's calculated SDC for one or more of
the city’s capital systems if the development incorporates private
physical improvements or programs that will permanently reduce
the impact the development has upon that capital system.
(2) The methodologies may include provisions pertaining to an
adjustment to a development’s calculated transportation SDC for
specific types of compact development.
(3) The impact reductions and compact development adjustments
approved for reduction or adjustment of the calculated SDC for
one type of capital system shall not be transferable to reduce or
adjust the SDC for another type of capital system.
Section 7. Section 7.735(2) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.735 SDC - Appeal Procedures.
(1) As used in this section, "working day" means a day when the general
offices of the city are open to transact business with the public.
(2) A person aggrieved by a decision required or permitted to be made by
the city manager or the manager's designee under sections 7.700 to
[7.730]7.732 or a person challenging the propriety of an expenditure of
systems development charge revenues may appeal the decision or the
expenditure by filing with the public works staff at the city’s permit
center a written request for consideration by the hearings officer and by
paying the fee for an appeal established under section 2.020 of this
code. Such appeal shall describe with particularity the decision or the
expenditure [from] which the person appeals and shall comply with
subsection (4) of this section.
(3) An appeal of an expenditure must be filed within two years of the date
of alleged improper expenditure. Appeals of any other decision must
be filed within 15 working days of the date of the decision.
(4) The appeal shall state:
(a) The name and address of the appellant;
(b) The nature of the determination being appealed;
(c) The reason the determination is incorrect; and
(d) What the correct determination of the appeal should be or how the
correct determination should be derived.
An appellant who fails to file such a statement within the time permitted
waives his/her objections, and his/her appeal shall be dismissed.
(5) Unless the appellant and the city agree to a longer period, an appeal
shall be heard by a hearings officer within 15 working days of the
receipt of the notice of intent to appeal. At least ten working days prior
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
to the hearing, the city shall mail notice of the time and location thereof
to the appellant.
(6) The hearings officer shall hear and determine the appeal on the basis
of the appellant's written statement and any additional evidence he/she
deems appropriate. At the hearing the appellant may present testimony
and oral argument personally or by counsel. The rules of evidence as
used by courts of law do not apply.
(7) The appellant shall carry the burden of proving that the determination
being appealed is incorrect and what the correct determination should
be or how a correct determination should be derived.
(8) The hearings officer shall issue a written decision within ten working
days after the hearing date and the decision of the hearings officer shall
be final.
Section 8. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the consent of the City
Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained herein,
or in other provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971, to the provisions added, amended or
repealed herein.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2019.
Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this
___ day of _____________, 2018 ____ day of _______________, 2018
__________________________ __________________________
City Recorder Mayor
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT
PLAN.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
A. The City of Eugene’s Transportation System Development Charge Project Plan
(“the Plan”) attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution includes a list of the transportation capital
improvements that the City intends to fund with revenues from a System Development Charge
(“SDC”) improvement fee, and the estimated costs, timing and percentage of costs eligible to be
funded with revenues from improvement fees for those capital improvements, as provided in ORS
223.309.
B. Public involvement was a major component of the Plan preparation process,
culminating with a public hearing on June 18, 2018.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. Based on the above findings which are adopted, and the public hearing held on
this matter, the City of Eugene’s Transportation System Development Charge Project Plan
attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution is approved.
Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective on January 1, 2019.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the ___ day of ______________, 2018.
City Recorder
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
1
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
CITY OF EUGENE
TRANSPORTATION
SDC
PROJECT PLAN
April 2018 November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 4
TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
TSP Priorities and Project Categories ........................................................................................................................................... 5
Projects to be Completed within 20 Years ............................................................................................................................. 5
Operational Projects .................................................................................................................................................................. 6
Upon-Development Projects .................................................................................................................................................... 6
Projects Beyond 20 Years .......................................................................................................................................................... 6
Project Costs ................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
Incentives for Compact Development .................................................................................................................................. 6
APPENDIX A: TABLES ............................................................................................................................................................... A-1
SDC Summary: Improvement Component ............................................................................................................................ A-2
2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) Project List ................................................................................................................ A-3
APPENDIX B: MAPS ................................................................................................................................................................. B-1
Map 1: Upon-Development Projects ...................................................................................................................................... B-1
Map 2: Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................... B-2
Map 3: Bicycle Facilities ............................................................................................................................................................. B-3
Map 4: Street Projects ................................................................................................................................................................ B-4
Incentive Area Map ................................................................................................................................................................... B-5
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
3
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
The City’s recently adopted 2035 Transportation System Plan
(TSP) and the Envision Eugene Comprehensive Plan provide
the foundation for the transportation infrastructure, goals, and
policies that support an economically vital, healthy, and
equitable community. Per the visions articulated in these
documents, our transportation systems affect nearly every
aspect of city life. We import the basic necessities of life –
food, clothing, and building materials – to our homes. A
constant flow of freight supplies many aspects of our lives.
We travel to work and school, and move about to socialize and play. Streets, rail lines, rivers, and airports create
the framework around which our cities are built and help define a city’s livability. Our personal choices about how
we travel affect our daily lives and our physical and mental well-being. Transportation is truly the backbone that
supports a community as it grows and evolves.
The 20-year list of multimodal projects included in the TSP reflects a future transportation system that is designed and
operated with the needs and safety of all travelers in mind, including people of all ages and abilities, especially the
most vulnerable, who are walking, driving, bicycling, using transit, or traveling with mobility aids, some out of
necessity. By making streets more inviting to pedestrians and bicyclists, especially for short trips, the City will gain
more efficient use of limited available space within the street rights-of-way, provide a healthier environment in
neighborhoods, and support higher density, mixed-use corridors. In furtherance of the goal to increase the number
of people choosing active transportation as their travel option, there are 245 bicycle, pedestrian and transit
projects planned for the next 20 years; these projects represent over 51% of the total transportation dollars that the
City plans to spend over the next 20 years.
Within this context, it is important to recognize that today’s fiscal environment is beset by uncertainty about future
federal, state and local funding for transportation projects. This uncertainty provides challenges to accurately
forecast the amount of funding available for transportation investments, and what projects or programs will receive
funding. As such, the TSP provides a prudent and conservative list of capital construction projects, an emphasis on
lower cost methods of improving personal mobility within the City, and an increased reliance on technologies that
can improve the efficiencies of our streets. Providing an updated Transportation System Development Charge
(TSDC) methodology and rate structure is one of the key implementation items associated with helping to achieve
the TSP vision within this funding environment.
To address the requirement of ORS223.309, this Project Plan includes a list of the capital improvements that the City
intends to fund, in whole or in part, with revenues from improvement fees collected through transportation system
development charges. The City will update this plan as it updates the prioritization of projects in recognition of
unforeseen opportunities associated with changes in policies or funding at the federal, state or local level as well as
changes in local economic development priorities and public-private partnerships.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
PROJECT STEERING COMMITTEE
Dan Kaler, Engineering Data Services Manager
Louranah Janeski, Engineering Compliance and Reporting Analyst
Rob Inerfeld, Transportation Planning Manager
Mark Schoening, City Engineer
Terri Harding, Principal Planner/Metro & Community Planning
Eric Brown, Assistant Planner
PREPARED BY:
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Galardi Rothstein Group, Inc.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
5
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES
TSP PRIORITIES AND PROJECT CATEGORIES
The 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) includes five categories of transportation programs and infrastructure
improvements to fulfill the plan’s goals and policies. These categories suggest timeframes for implementation
based on complexity, likely available funding (including potential funding sources), and assessment of need, and
include:
Projects to be completed within 20 years;
Operational projects (on-going);
Projects to be completed upon development;
Projects to be completed beyond 20 years; and
Study projects.
PROJECTS TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 20 YEARS
These projects represent the City’s current priorities for implementation in the next 20 years (up to the year 2035).
Projects in this category may be funded through a variety of sources including federal, state, or local transportation
funds, Transportation System Development Charges (TSDCs), partnerships with private developers, or a combination
of these sources. Roadway, multimodal, transit, and rail projects to be completed within 20 years are listed in the
tables in Appendix A and shown on the maps in Appendix B.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
6
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
OPERATIONAL PROJECTS
These projects are typically related to modifications to intersections that are lower in cost than a typical roadway
project and are ones that generally do not require right-of-way acquisition. The operational projects generally
include: new traffic signals, adding accessible pedestrian signals at intersections, and upgrading the existing traffic
signal communications infrastructure to increase the capacity and overall efficiency of the transportation system.
The funding of operational projects is included within the TSDC. This is reflected in the tables in Appendix A.
UPON-DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
As properties develop or redevelop, a number of projects will be completed to serve new development. The timing
of these projects is uncertain and they are unlikely to be advanced by the City in the absence of specific private
development activities. Typically, these projects address only localized transportation needs associated with newly
developing or redeveloping areas.
The list of projects to be completed upon development reflects the City’s current understanding of likely priorities in
these areas. At the time that development or land use applications are submitted, additional or different provisions
may be required as conditions of approval based on the specifics of the actual development application and the
applicable land use regulations. The projects in this category may also be funded through a variety of sources, such
as urban renewal, private funds, TSDCs, or proportionate sharing (based on the level of anticipated impact of a
specific development). These projects are provided in the tables in Appendix A and shown on the maps in
Appendix B.
PROJECTS BEYOND 20 YEARS
Projects that will be implemented after 20 years are still important to consider because they could be needed to
address future transportation issues, or are simply not able to be funded within the 20 year planning horizon of the
TSP. Inclusion of projects in the Beyond 20 Years category provides the City flexibility to re-evaluate priorities and to
pursue a variety of funding opportunities that may arise over the life of the TSP. The City has not identified cost
estimates for these long term projects and they are not included in the TSDC.
PROJECT COSTS
Costs for each of the TSDC-eligible projects are shown in Appendix A. These costs were included in the TSP and
reflect order-of-magnitude or planning-level estimates of right-of-way, design engineering and construction, and
they generally include a 30 percent contingency. All costs are rounded and provided in 2014 dollars. The City will
annually adjust the TSDC-eligible project costs using a Construction Cost Index to derive the TSDC trip rate
INCENTIVES FOR COMPACT DEVELOPMENT
As part of the City’s strategies to promote compact development and the goals of Envision Eugene, certain types
of compact development may qualify for a reduction to their calculated TSDC. Some of these reductions are
available only within the specific geographic areas generally displayed in the “Incentive Area Map” in Appendix B.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
1
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PLAN, 2018
Appendix A
Tables
Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
SD
C
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
:
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
F
E
E
C
O
M
P
O
N
E
N
T
Gr
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
of
N
e
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
(a
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
T
y
p
e
(b
)
To
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
1
(c
)
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
Co
s
t
(d
)
(b
-
c
)
Ne
t
N
e
w
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Co
s
t
s
2
(e
)
(d
x
f
)
$
(f
)
%
(g
)
Ne
t
o
f
Ot
h
e
r
Fu
n
d
i
n
g
3
(h
)
SD
C
p
e
r
Ve
h
i
c
l
e
Tr
i
p
4
(i
)
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
As
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
5 (j) Grants 6 (k) (g + i + j) SDC Plus Grants & Assessable
Mu
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
St
r
e
e
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
1
8
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
8
,
8
2
4
,
5
6
9
30
%
$2
6
,
6
2
4
,
5
6
9
$6
5
0
$1
9
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$46,424,569
Up
o
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
3
4
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
0
,
1
1
4
,
4
8
3
66
%
$4
7
,
9
2
9
,
9
9
2
$1
,
1
7
0
$6
4
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$112,029,992
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Ne
w
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$8
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
1
4
7
,
8
4
3
25
%
$2
,
1
4
7
,
8
4
3
$5
2
Ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Si
g
n
a
l
s
$7
,
4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$7
,
4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
3
8
,
5
5
4
25
%
$1
,
8
3
8
,
5
5
4
$4
5
Ma
s
t
e
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
P
l
a
n
$9
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
3
3
1
,
9
4
4
25
%
$2
,
3
3
1
,
9
4
4
$5
7
Ac
t
i
v
e
M
o
d
e
s
(
2
0
-
Y
e
a
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
)
Sh
a
r
e
d
U
s
e
P
a
t
h
s
7
$2
4
,
5
2
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
4
,
5
2
9
,
0
0
0
$2
4
,
5
2
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
1
,
3
5
4
,
3
2
1
$5
2
1
$3,174,679 $24,529,000
Bi
k
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
$2
9
,
0
1
0
,
2
8
2
$0
$2
9
,
0
1
0
,
2
8
2
$1
1
,
6
3
4
,
7
5
2
40
%
$1
0
,
7
2
1
,
5
4
7
$2
6
2
$4,592,661 $15,314,208
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
8
$9
,
7
8
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
,
7
8
1
,
0
0
0
$8
1
0
,
0
0
0
8%
$7
7
2
,
5
1
9
$1
9
$8
,
9
7
1
,
0
0
0
$37,481 $9,781,000
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
$6
3
,
3
2
0
,
2
8
2
$6
3
,
3
2
0
,
2
8
2
$3
6
,
9
7
3
,
7
5
2
58
%
$3
2
,
8
4
8
,
3
8
7
$8
0
2
$8
,
9
7
1
,
0
0
0
$7,804,821 $49,624,208
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
$3
4
1
,
8
6
0
,
2
8
2
$3
3
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
8
,
5
6
0
,
2
8
2
$1
5
2
,
2
3
1
,
1
4
6
37
%
$1
1
3
,
7
2
1
,
2
9
0
$2
,
7
7
6
$9
2
,
8
7
1
,
0
0
0
$7,804,821 $208,078,769
1
Ne
t
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
b
u
n
d
l
e
c
o
s
t
s
2
Ne
t
o
f
r
a
i
l
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
s
t
s
3 R
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
t
h
e
r
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
n
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
b
a
s
i
s
4
Co
l
u
m
n
(
g
)
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
P
M
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
T
r
i
p
E
n
d
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
2
0
3
5
:
4
0
,
9
7
2
5
Av
e
r
a
g
e
a
s
s
e
s
s
a
b
l
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
n
e
w
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
6
Re
f
l
e
c
t
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
s
7 I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
“
S
h
a
r
e
d
U
s
e
P
a
t
h
,
”
“
G
r
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
P
a
t
h
,
”
a
n
d
“
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
P
a
t
h
”
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
8 I
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
“
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
s
”
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
n
o
t
f
u
n
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
S
D
C
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
.
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
2
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
20
3
5
T
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
Y
S
T
E
M
P
L
AN
(
T
S
P
)
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
L
I
S
T
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Mu
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
MM
-
1
6
Up
g
r
a
d
e
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
f
r
o
m
1
8
t
h
Av
e
.
t
o
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$3
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
,
3
7
5
,
5
1
1
$0 $1,375,511 35%
MM
-
1
3
Up
g
r
a
d
e
B
e
t
h
e
l
f
r
o
m
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
9
9
t
o
R
o
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
20
-
y
r
$1
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
37
%
$3
,
6
5
3
,
9
2
5
$0 $3,653,925 31%
MM
-
1
2
Up
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
/
S
o
u
t
h
se
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
y
F
a
r
m
L
o
o
p
20
-
y
r
$4
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
23
%
$9
2
9
,
4
5
5
$0 $929,455 21%
MM
-
1
4
Up
g
r
a
d
e
W
1
1
t
h
f
r
o
m
T
e
r
r
y
to
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
20
-
y
r
$1
2
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
23
%
$2
,
5
2
7
,
2
8
0
$0 $2,527,280 21%
MM
-
1
1
Up
g
r
a
d
e
H
u
n
s
a
k
e
r
Ln
/
B
e
a
v
e
r
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$9
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
33
%
$2
,
6
6
8
,
1
9
1
$0 $2,668,191 29%
MM
-
1
5
Up
g
r
a
d
e
J
e
p
p
e
s
e
n
A
c
r
e
s
(G
i
l
h
a
m
t
o
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
)
20
-
y
r
$3
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
26
%
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0 $900,000 23%
Mu
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
—
O
t
h
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
MM
-
1
9
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
F
r
a
n
k
l
i
n
B
l
v
d
.
a
s
a
m
u
l
t
i
-
w
a
y
b
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
W
a
l
n
u
t
a
n
d
O
n
y
x
20
-
y
r
$2
7
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
5
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
23
%
$5
,
8
9
3
,
1
4
2
$0 $5,893,142 21%
MM
-
2
0
Ad
d
l
a
n
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
R
a
n
d
y
Pa
p
e
B
e
l
t
l
i
n
e
f
r
o
m
R
o
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
to
W
1
1
t
h
,
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
20
-
y
r
$2
8
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
34
%
$6
,
9
2
3
,
2
3
6
$0 $6,923,236 25%
MM
-
2
1
Wi
d
e
n
B
a
r
g
e
r
D
r
.
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
l
a
n
e
i
n
ea
c
h
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
20
-
y
r
$1
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4%
$4
8
,
3
3
6
$0 $48,336 3%
MM
-
2
2
Co
n
v
e
r
t
8
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
2
-
w
a
y
st
r
e
e
t
20
-
y
r
$3
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
4%
$8
7
,
0
2
7
$0 $87,027 2%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
3
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
MM
-
8
Ad
d
c
e
n
t
e
r
t
u
r
n
l
a
n
e
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
n
L
u
t
h
e
r
K
i
n
g
J
r
.
B
l
v
d
.
be
t
w
e
e
n
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
W
&
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
L
o
o
p
W
20
-
y
r
$6
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
9%
$2
8
4
,
1
8
1
$0 $284,181 4%
MM
-
2
7
No
r
t
h
G
i
l
h
a
m
R
d
.
$1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
26
%
$3
3
4
,
2
8
5
.
7
1
$0 $334,286 22%
MM
-
2
8
Co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
i
n
C
r
e
s
c
e
n
t
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2,200,000 $1,000,000 31%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
M
u
l
t
i
m
o
d
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
1
8
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
30
%
$2
8
,
8
2
4
,
5
6
9
$2,200,000 $26,624,569
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
-
D
r
i
v
e
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
UD
-
1
Co
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
,
E
n
i
d
t
o
A
w
b
r
e
y
$7
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2,300,000 $5,100,000 69%
UD
-
2
Hy
a
c
i
n
t
h
f
r
o
m
1
4
0
'
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
Br
o
t
h
e
r
t
o
n
t
o
A
r
g
o
n
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$500,000 $200,000 29%
UD
-
3
Av
e
n
g
a
l
e
f
r
o
m
8
7
0
-
f
e
e
t
e
a
s
t
of
W
a
l
t
o
n
t
o
C
o
u
n
t
y
F
a
r
m
$2
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
92
%
$2
,
5
7
0
,
4
0
0
$2,270,400 $300,000 11%
UD
-
5
Le
g
a
c
y
f
r
o
m
2
5
0
-
f
e
e
t
s
o
u
t
h
of
A
v
a
l
o
n
t
o
R
o
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
$1
7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
7
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
99
%
$1
7
,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
$7,125,000 $10,200,000 58%
UD
-
6
Co
l
t
o
n
W
a
y
f
r
o
m
1
4
0
-
f
e
e
t
so
u
t
h
o
f
D
o
n
o
h
o
e
t
o
L
e
g
a
c
y
Ex
t
.
$3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2,600,000 $1,100,000 30%
UD
-
7
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
&
o
t
h
e
r
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
w
R
d
.
Ar
e
a
$2
1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
1
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
99
%
$2
0
,
9
5
2
,
3
0
0
$12,352,300 $8,600,000 40%
UD
-
8
13
t
h
A
v
e
.
f
r
o
m
6
4
0
-
f
e
e
t
e
a
s
t
of
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
t
o
D
a
n
i
$3
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2,400,000 $1,200,000 33%
UD
-
9
Aw
b
r
e
y
L
n
.
,
H
W
Y
9
9
t
o
8
5
0
-
fe
e
t
w
e
s
t
o
f
P
r
a
i
r
i
e
R
d
.
$8
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$6
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
44
%
$2
,
6
5
2
,
1
7
5
- $2,652,175 30%
UD
-
1
0
Be
a
c
o
n
D
r
i
v
e
E
a
s
t
,
4
4
0
'
e
a
s
t
of
R
i
v
e
r
R
o
a
d
t
o
S
c
e
n
i
c
D
r
i
v
e
$3
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
%
$5
7
3
,
9
1
3
- $573,913 16%
UD
-
1
1
Sc
e
n
i
c
D
r
i
v
e
,
R
i
v
e
r
L
o
o
p
#
2
to
B
e
a
c
o
n
D
r
i
v
e
$4
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
13
%
$5
3
9
,
3
2
6
- $539,326 13%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
4
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
UD
-
1
2
Sp
r
i
n
g
C
r
e
e
k
D
r
.
,
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
.
t
o
Sc
e
n
i
c
D
r
.
$2
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
15
%
$3
5
1
,
6
4
8
- $351,648 14%
UD
-
1
3
Ri
v
e
r
L
o
o
p
#
2
,
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
.
t
o
Bu
r
l
w
o
o
d
$6
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
21
%
$1
,
2
2
1
,
1
1
5
- $1,221,115 19%
UD
-
1
4
Wi
l
k
e
s
D
r
.
,
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
.
t
o
R
i
v
e
r
Lo
o
p
#
1
$7
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
11
%
$6
5
1
,
6
8
5
- $651,685 9%
UD
-
1
5
Ri
v
e
r
L
o
o
p
#
1
,
R
i
v
e
r
R
d
.
t
o
Da
l
e
w
o
o
d
$1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
26
%
$3
3
7
,
7
0
9
- $337,709 23%
UD
-
1
9
Co
u
n
t
y
F
a
r
m
R
d
.
(
e
a
s
t
-
w
e
s
t
se
g
m
e
n
t
)
$3
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
64
%
$1
,
8
6
7
,
0
3
1
$567,031 $1,300,000 41%
UD
-
2
0
Ro
y
a
l
A
v
e
.
,
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
.
t
o
Gr
e
e
n
h
i
l
l
R
d
.
$1
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
45
%
$3
,
9
4
7
,
3
9
8
- $3,947,398 35%
UD
-
2
1
Wi
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
.
,
W
.
1
8
t
h
Av
e
.
t
o
U
G
B
$5
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
78
%
$3
,
6
6
9
,
7
6
0
$2,069,760 $1,600,000 31%
UD
-
2
2
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
.
,
W
a
r
r
e
n
t
o
UG
B
$9
,
9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
49
%
$3
,
9
7
0
,
5
7
3
- $3,970,573 40%
UD
-
2
3
Di
l
l
a
r
d
R
d
.
,
4
3
r
d
A
v
e
.
t
o
U
G
B
$8
,
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$7
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
37
%
$2
,
6
7
9
,
8
6
4
- $2,679,864 33%
UD
-
2
4
Fo
x
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
.
f
r
o
m
D
o
n
a
l
d
to
U
G
B
$5
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
$4
0
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
27
%
$1
,
4
0
4
,
5
8
6
- $1,404,586 25%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
r
i
v
e
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
$1
3
4
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$1
2
2
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
$8
0
,
1
1
4
,
4
8
3
$32,184,491 $47,929,992
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
53
Gr
o
v
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$6
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
6
,
4
7
0
$0 $26,470 40%
60
W
A
m
a
z
o
n
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$4
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
8
5
0
$0 $18,850 40%
73
N
D
a
n
e
b
o
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
5
,
2
6
7
$0 $25,267 40%
74
Go
l
d
e
n
G
a
r
d
e
n
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$6
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
4
,
8
6
5
$0 $24,865 40%
75
Av
a
l
o
n
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
2
,
8
3
4
$0 $12,834 40%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
77
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$8
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
4
,
8
9
2
$1,748 $33,144 38%
85
Ho
n
e
y
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
3
,
6
3
6
$794 $12,842 38%
86
Ho
n
e
y
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$7
,
2
0
0
$0
$7
,
2
0
0
40
%
$2
,
8
8
8
$176 $2,712 38%
95
Mo
n
r
o
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
2
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
2
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
9
,
7
3
1
$0 $49,731 40%
10
5
Un
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
1
,
7
1
0
$0 $41,710 40%
10
7
W
1
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
6
,
9
2
4
$0 $46,924 40%
10
9
Wi
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$7
,
2
1
9
$0 $7,219 40%
11
0
W
B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$1
7
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
7
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$6
8
,
1
8
0
$0 $68,180 40%
11
1
Br
o
a
d
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$4
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
8
5
0
$0 $18,850 40%
11
4
La
w
r
e
n
c
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
5
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
5
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$6
0
,
5
5
9
$0 $60,559 40%
12
4
Gr
e
e
n
v
i
e
w
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$9
,
2
2
4
$329 $8,895 39%
12
5
Fa
i
r
o
a
k
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
0
1
1
$422 $3,589 36%
12
6
La
r
i
a
t
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$3
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
3
,
6
3
6
$0 $13,636 40%
12
7
Ta
n
d
y
T
u
r
n
20
-
y
r
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
0
3
7
$836 $13,201 38%
12
8
Ta
n
d
y
T
u
r
n
20
-
y
r
$3
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
3
,
2
3
5
$752 $12,483 38%
12
9
Fi
r
w
o
o
d
W
a
y
20
-
y
r
$1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
4
1
2
$465 $3,947 36%
13
0
Pa
l
o
m
i
n
o
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
0
4
8
$1,258 $16,790 37%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
6
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
13
1
Ba
i
l
e
y
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
2
,
5
1
2
$2,549 $39,963 38%
13
4
De
l
t
a
O
a
k
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$1
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
8
1
3
$507 $4,306 36%
13
5
Ho
l
l
y
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$6
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
6
,
4
7
0
$1,503 $24,967 38%
13
6
Sn
e
l
l
i
n
g
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$4
6
,
4
0
0
$0
$4
6
,
4
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
6
0
9
$1,060 $17,549 38%
13
7
Er
i
n
W
a
y
20
-
y
r
$8
,
2
0
0
$0
$8
,
2
0
0
40
%
$3
,
2
8
9
$218 $3,071 37%
13
8
Ch
a
d
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$2
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
,
4
2
2
$245 $8,177 39%
13
9
Je
p
p
e
s
e
n
A
c
r
e
s
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$8
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
4
,
4
9
1
$1,705 $32,786 38%
14
1
Bo
n
d
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
0
,
8
5
5
$912 $19,943 38%
14
6
Co
p
p
i
n
g
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
0
3
7
$0 $14,037 40%
15
3
Ru
b
y
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
4
,
5
1
7
$0 $44,517 40%
15
5
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$6
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
4
,
4
6
4
$0 $24,464 40%
15
7
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
3
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
3
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
3
,
7
4
2
$0 $53,742 40%
15
9
La
k
e
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$5
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
1
,
6
5
7
$0 $21,657 40%
16
1
Ho
r
n
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
6
,
1
2
1
$0 $46,121 40%
16
2
Ar
b
o
r
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$2
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
8
2
9
$0 $10,829 40%
16
3
Hi
l
l
a
r
d
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
$1
3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
3
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
2
,
5
3
8
$0 $52,538 40%
16
7
Be
r
n
t
z
e
n
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
2
,
8
3
4
$0 $12,834 40%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
7
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
16
8
Wa
i
t
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
8
2
9
$0 $10,829 40%
37
4
Ro
b
i
n
H
o
o
d
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$3
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
2
,
8
3
4
$709 $12,125 38%
38
1
E
1
3
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$2
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
4
2
7
$0 $10,427 40%
38
6
Ad
k
i
n
s
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
0
,
8
5
5
$912 $19,943 38%
38
7
N
C
l
a
r
e
y
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
7
,
2
9
8
$0 $37,298 40%
38
8
Ga
y
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$6
,
4
1
7
$0 $6,417 40%
38
9
Sa
r
a
h
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
$4
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
4
4
9
$0 $18,449 40%
39
7
Po
r
t
l
a
n
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
5
,
2
4
0
$0 $15,240 40%
39
8
W
2
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$9
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
,
6
1
0
$0 $3,610 40%
44
6
W
1
2
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
6
,
1
2
1
$0 $46,121 40%
44
9
As
c
o
t
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
0
3
7
$836 $13,201 38%
45
1
Fa
i
r
O
a
k
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$7
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
8
,
0
7
4
$1,672 $26,402 38%
45
2
Da
p
p
l
e
W
a
y
20
-
y
r
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
2
,
1
1
1
$2,507 $39,604 38%
45
3
We
s
t
w
a
r
d
H
o
A
v
e
.
/
S
u
n
s
h
i
n
e
Ac
r
e
s
20
-
y
r
$9
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
9
,
3
0
4
$2,212 $37,092 38%
45
8
E
2
7
t
h
/
2
8
t
h
/
2
9
t
h
A
v
e
.
/
H
i
g
h
St
.
20
-
y
r
$6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
4
,
0
6
3
$0 $24,063 40%
45
9
So
u
t
h
P
e
a
r
l
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$5
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
3
,
6
6
2
$0 $23,662 40%
46
0
Al
d
e
r
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$8
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
2
,
0
8
4
$0 $32,084 40%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
8
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
46
1
Pa
r
k
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$9
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
9
,
3
0
4
$0 $39,304 40%
48
6
Wi
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$5
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
3
,
2
6
1
$0 $23,261 40%
48
8
Mi
l
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
/
E
1
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$9
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
6
,
4
9
6
$0 $36,496 40%
49
2
W
2
2
n
d
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$4
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
6
,
8
4
4
$0 $16,844 40%
50
3
Hi
g
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$4
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
6
,
8
4
4
$0 $16,844 40%
50
5
St
e
p
h
e
n
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
4
1
2
$0 $4,412 40%
52
8
W
2
7
t
h
P
l
.
,
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$9
,
6
2
5
$0 $9,625 40%
54
2
Fa
i
r
O
a
k
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$7
,
2
1
9
$118 $7,101 39%
54
4
Ca
l
v
i
n
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
0
2
6
$413 $9,613 38%
54
5
Mo
n
t
e
r
e
y
L
n
.
(
L
a
r
k
s
p
u
r
L
p
.
t
o
Lo
n
g
I
s
l
a
n
d
D
r
.
)
20
-
y
r
$9
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
,
6
1
0
$380 $3,230 36%
54
6
Mo
n
t
e
r
e
y
L
n
.
(
N
o
r
k
e
n
z
i
e
R
d
.
to
L
a
r
k
s
p
u
r
L
p
.
)
20
-
y
r
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
0
1
1
$422 $3,589 36%
54
7
Lo
n
g
I
s
l
a
n
d
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
0
3
7
$836 $13,201 38%
54
8
Sh
a
d
o
w
V
i
e
w
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$2
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
8
2
9
$0 $10,829 40%
57
6
We
s
t
l
e
i
g
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
,
6
1
5
$0 $5,615 40%
57
7
Ja
y
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
5
,
6
4
1
$0 $15,641 40%
57
8
Cu
b
i
t
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$4
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
8
,
4
4
9
$0 $18,449 40%
57
9
We
s
t
e
r
n
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
2
,
4
3
3
$667 $11,766 38%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
9
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
58
7
Ri
o
G
l
e
n
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$2
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
1
,
6
3
1
$583 $11,048 38%
58
8
17
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
1
,
7
1
0
$0 $41,710 40%
59
1
Ga
r
d
e
n
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
0
,
8
5
5
$0 $20,855 40%
59
3
Al
d
e
r
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
3
,
3
1
4
$0 $43,314 40%
59
5
Gr
a
n
t
S
t
.
(
W
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
t
o
W
15
t
h
A
v
e
.
)
20
-
y
r
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
0
,
1
0
6
$0 $40,106 40%
59
7
Gr
a
n
t
S
t
.
(
W
1
7
th
A
v
e
.
t
o
W
.
22
nd
A
v
e
.
)
20
-
y
r
$4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
9
,
6
5
2
$0 $19,652 40%
59
8
W
2
2
n
d
A
v
e
.
(
G
r
a
n
t
–
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
s
)
20
-
y
r
$1
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$7
,
2
1
9
$0 $7,219 40%
59
9
W
2
2
n
d
A
v
e
.
(
G
r
a
n
t
–
C
i
t
y
Vi
e
w
)
20
-
y
r
$5
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
0
,
8
5
5
$0 $20,855 40%
60
0
Ci
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
,
0
1
1
$0 $4,011 40%
60
1
W
2
1
s
t
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$4
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
6
,
8
4
4
$0 $16,844 40%
60
5
Hy
a
c
i
n
t
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
3
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
3
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
4
,
1
4
3
$0 $54,143 40%
60
6
Sp
r
i
n
g
C
r
e
e
k
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$6
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
7
,
2
7
2
$0 $27,272 40%
60
7
Sc
e
n
i
c
D
r
.
(
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
s
–
Sp
r
i
n
g
C
r
e
e
k
)
20
-
y
r
$5
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
2
,
0
5
8
$0 $22,058 40%
60
8
Sc
e
n
i
c
D
r
.
(
S
p
r
i
n
g
C
r
e
e
k
–
Wi
l
k
e
s
)
20
-
y
r
$8
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
5
,
6
9
4
$0 $35,694 40%
60
9
Th
r
o
n
e
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
0
,
0
7
9
$0 $30,079 40%
61
4
Hy
a
c
i
n
t
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
5
,
3
1
9
$0 $45,319 40%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
$5
,
0
9
7
,
8
0
0
$0
$5
,
0
9
7
,
8
0
0
$2
,
0
4
4
,
5
0
4
$27,741 $2,016,763
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
0
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
18
Hi
g
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
,
2
6
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
2
6
7
,
0
0
0
40
%
$9
0
9
,
1
9
4
$0 $909,194 40%
46
E
A
m
a
z
o
n
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$2
,
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
8
5
,
9
3
3
$0 $885,933 40%
39
1
Oa
k
w
a
y
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$2
,
1
8
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
1
8
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
7
5
,
9
0
7
$0 $875,907 40%
39
2
Ca
l
Y
o
u
n
g
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$5
0
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
0
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
0
3
,
7
3
7
$0 $203,737 40%
39
3
Wi
l
l
a
k
e
n
z
i
e
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$3
,
1
4
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
1
4
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
,
2
5
9
,
7
1
7
$0 $1,259,717 40%
52
6
Ri
v
e
r
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$4
,
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
,
4
4
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
,
7
8
1
,
0
9
0
$0 $1,781,090 40%
55
6
13
t
h
A
v
e
n
u
e
20
-
y
r
$3
,
2
8
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
2
8
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
,
3
1
5
,
4
6
4
$885,464 $430,000 13%
57
1
Li
n
c
o
l
n
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
,
4
1
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
,
4
1
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
6
9
,
0
9
9
$0 $569,099 40%
58
0
Hi
l
y
a
r
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
3
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
3
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
3
2
,
3
4
9
$0 $132,349 40%
58
2
E
B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
6
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
6
,
2
8
0
$0 $106,280 40%
58
3
8t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
,
2
2
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
,
2
2
1
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
8
9
,
6
9
0
$0 $489,690 40%
58
9
E
2
4
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
,
1
8
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
,
1
8
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
7
6
,
8
5
6
$0 $476,856 40%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
$2
2
,
4
5
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
2
,
4
5
4
,
0
0
0
$9
,
0
0
5
,
3
1
5
$885,464 $8,119,851
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
1
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Bi
k
e
L
a
n
e
s
31
Wi
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
1
5
,
0
0
0
40
%
$4
6
,
1
2
1
$0 $46,121 40%
38
Fo
x
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
39
W
1
1
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
41
Ga
r
f
i
e
l
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$9
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
7
,
2
9
8
$0 $37,298 40%
42
Be
a
v
e
r
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
43
Hu
n
s
a
k
e
r
L
n
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
44
Wi
l
k
e
s
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$1
2
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
2
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
0
,
5
3
3
$0 $50,533 40%
45
S
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
54
W
7
t
h
P
l
.
20
-
y
r
$1
3
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
3
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
4
,
5
4
4
$0 $54,544 40%
59
Pr
a
i
r
i
e
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$1
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$7
,
6
2
0
$0 $7,620 40%
61
Be
t
h
e
l
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
63
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
9
9
20
-
y
r
$7
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
2
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
8
,
8
7
6
$0 $28,876 40%
66
Di
l
l
a
r
d
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
71
Ba
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
,
0
2
1
$0 $8,021 40%
15
8
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$2
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
0
,
4
2
7
$0 $10,427 40%
22
6
W
1
3
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$2
4
,
7
4
7
$0
$2
4
,
7
4
7
40
%
$9
,
9
2
5
$0 $9,925 40%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
2
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
22
9
Co
u
n
t
y
F
a
r
m
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$1
0
7
,
2
3
5
$0
$1
0
7
,
2
3
5
40
%
$4
3
,
0
0
7
$0 $43,007 40%
40
0
Ro
y
a
l
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
44
5
Ci
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$6
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
7
,
2
7
2
$0 $27,272 40%
44
7
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
9
9
20
-
y
r
$4
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
4
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
7
,
6
4
6
$0 $17,646 40%
45
5
Oa
k
P
a
t
c
h
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$6
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
5
,
2
6
7
$0 $25,267 40%
48
2
Gi
l
h
a
m
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
Ur
b
a
n
*
$0
52
3
Po
l
k
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
0
,
2
1
1
$0 $80,211 40%
55
4
W
2
n
d
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
4
3
8
$0 $14,438 40%
56
1
W
1
3
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$1
3
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
3
3
,
0
0
0
40
%
$5
3
,
3
4
0
$0 $53,340 40%
56
4
Co
m
m
e
r
c
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
4
3
8
$0 $14,438 40%
56
8
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
B
l
v
d
.
20
-
y
r
$2
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
,
0
0
0
40
%
$8
,
0
2
1
$0 $8,021 40%
57
2
W
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$8
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
,
0
0
0
40
%
$3
,
2
0
8
$0 $3,208 40%
57
4
Hi
g
h
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
6
,
5
0
0
$0
$1
6
,
5
0
0
40
%
$6
,
6
1
7
$0 $6,617 40%
57
5
Co
u
n
t
y
F
a
r
m
R
d
.
20
-
y
r
$5
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
9
,
0
0
0
40
%
$2
3
,
6
6
2
$0 $23,662 40%
59
2
E
4
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$3
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
6
,
0
0
0
40
%
$1
4
,
4
3
8
$0 $14,438 40%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
B
i
k
e
L
a
n
e
$1
,
4
5
8
,
4
8
2
$0
$1
,
4
5
8
,
4
8
2
$5
8
4
,
9
3
3
$0 $584,933
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
3
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Sh
a
r
e
d
U
s
e
P
a
t
h
21
E
3
0
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$2
,
7
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
7
4
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
,
7
4
9
,
0
0
0
$0 $2,749,000 100%
21
1
Sp
r
i
n
g
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$5
5
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
5
4
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$5
5
4
,
0
0
0
$0 $554,000 100%
22
2
W
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$9
5
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
5
1
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$9
5
1
,
0
0
0
$0 $951,000 100%
22
3
Je
s
s
e
n
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$3
,
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
,
3
5
0
,
0
0
0
$1,898,662 $1,451,338 43%
23
1
Wi
l
s
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$2
9
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
9
8
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
9
8
,
0
0
0
$0 $298,000 100%
24
3
Be
l
t
l
i
n
e
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$2
,
0
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
,
0
1
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
,
0
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $2,016,000 100%
37
6
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$6
3
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
3
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$6
3
9
,
0
0
0
$0 $639,000 100%
39
4
Am
a
z
o
n
R
o
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
Co
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
20
-
y
r
$2
6
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
6
1
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
6
1
,
0
0
0
$0 $261,000 100%
39
5
Fe
r
n
R
i
d
g
e
W
e
s
t
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
o
r
20
-
y
r
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0 $125,000 100%
45
9
Hi
l
y
a
r
d
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$8
6
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
6
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$8
6
6
,
0
0
0
$460,039 $405,961 47%
47
5
W
A
m
a
z
o
n
D
r
.
20
-
y
r
$7
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
0
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0 $709,000 100%
49
4
Am
a
z
o
n
P
a
r
k
E
a
s
t
-
W
e
s
t
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$8
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
1
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$8
1
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $816,000 100%
55
2
UG
B
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$3
,
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
,
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
,
2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0 $3,209,000 100%
55
5
Ki
n
c
a
i
d
S
t
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
0
9
,
0
0
0
$0 $209,000 100%
61
0
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
B
l
v
d
.
20
-
y
r
$8
0
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
0
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$8
0
5
,
0
0
0
$716,450 $88,550 11%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
S
h
a
r
e
d
U
s
e
P
a
t
h
$1
7
,
5
5
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
7
,
5
5
7
,
0
0
0
$1
7
,
5
5
7
,
0
0
0
$3,075,151 $14,481,849
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
4
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
P
a
t
h
48
1
Di
v
i
s
i
o
n
A
v
e
.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$7
0
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
0
1
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
0
1
,
0
0
0
$0 $701,000 100%
50
8
Fr
a
n
k
l
i
n
B
l
v
d
.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$2
7
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
7
3
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
7
3
,
0
0
0
$0 $273,000 100%
56
5
Co
m
m
e
r
c
e
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$1
5
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
5
7
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$1
5
7
,
0
0
0
$0 $157,000 100%
61
5
W
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$2
0
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
7
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
0
7
,
0
0
0
$0 $207,000 100%
49
5
W
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
20
-
y
r
$7
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
4
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
4
,
0
0
0
$0 $74,000 100%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
P
a
t
h
$1
,
4
1
2
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
,
4
1
2
,
0
0
0
$1
,
4
1
2
,
0
0
0
$0 $1,412,000
Ac
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
s
19
6
Av
a
l
o
n
S
t
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$8
7
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
7
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$8
7
,
0
0
0
$0 $87,000 100%
19
7
La
n
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
F
a
i
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Ac
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$1
8
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
8
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$1
8
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $186,000 100%
21
8
Ha
n
s
e
n
L
n
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$9
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
8
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$9
8
,
0
0
0
$0 $98,000 100%
22
0
Mc
C
l
u
r
e
L
n
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$4
5
,
0
0
0
$0 $45,000 100%
22
1
Ar
b
o
r
D
r
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$4
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$4
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $46,000 100%
23
0
Mu
r
i
n
S
t
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$1
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $16,000 100%
25
0
W
1
1
t
h
A
v
e
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$5
3
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
3
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$5
3
,
0
0
0
$0 $53,000 100%
25
5
W
2
7
t
h
A
v
e
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$6
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
1
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$6
1
,
0
0
0
$0 $61,000 100%
25
6
Li
n
c
o
l
n
S
t
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$6
6
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
6
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$6
6
,
0
0
0
$0 $66,000 100%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
25
8
Sp
y
g
l
a
s
s
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$6
4
,
0
0
0
$0
$6
4
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$6
4
,
0
0
0
$25,259 $38,741 61%
25
9
Ho
l
l
y
A
v
e
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$3
1
,
0
0
0
$0
$3
1
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$3
1
,
0
0
0
$12,222 $18,778 61%
47
2
E
2
5
t
h
A
v
e
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
20
-
y
r
$9
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$9
,
0
0
0
$0 $9,000 100%
56
0
Wa
l
l
i
s
S
t
.
P
a
t
h
20
-
y
r
$4
8
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
8
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$4
8
,
0
0
0
$0 $48,000 100%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
A
c
c
e
s
s
w
a
y
s
$8
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$8
1
0
,
0
0
0
$8
1
0
,
0
0
0
$37,481 $772,519
Gr
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
12
Pa
r
k
A
v
e
.
O
v
e
r
p
a
s
s
20
-
y
r
$4
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$4
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$4
,
1
1
0
,
0
0
0
$0 $4,110,000 100%
24
9
Am
a
z
o
n
D
r
.
F
o
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
20
-
y
r
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$33,176 $41,824 56%
39
0
Ja
y
S
t
.
B
r
i
d
g
e
20
-
y
r
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$1
2
5
,
0
0
0
$0 $125,000 100%
59
6
Gr
a
n
t
S
t
.
20
-
y
r
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$9
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0 $900,000 100%
61
2
Am
a
z
o
n
a
n
d
3
6
t
h
D
r
.
Fo
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
20
-
y
r
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$33,176 $41,824 56%
61
3
Am
a
z
o
n
a
n
d
D
i
l
l
a
r
d
Fo
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
20
-
y
r
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$0
$7
5
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$7
5
,
0
0
0
$33,176 $41,824 56%
21
9
Am
a
z
o
n
a
n
d
3
4
th
A
v
e
.
Fo
o
t
b
r
i
d
g
e
20
-
y
r
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
10
0
%
$2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$0 $200,000 100%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
G
r
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
$5
,
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$5
,
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
$5
,
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
$99,528 $5,460,472
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
A-
1
6
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
U
G
E
N
E
TR
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
D
C
PR
O
J
E
C
T
P
L
A
N
,
2
0
1
8
TS
P
No
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
T
i
m
e
f
r
a
m
e
T
o
t
a
l
C
o
s
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
C
o
s
t
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
s
t
s
G
r
o
w
t
h
S
h
a
r
e
o
f
N
e
w
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
s
t
Other Funds Applied Net TSDC-Eligible Costs TSDC %
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
Ne
w
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$8
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
$8
,
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
$2
,
1
4
7
,
8
4
3
$0 $2,147,843 25%
Ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$7
,
4
9
0
,
0
0
0
$7
,
4
9
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
$1
,
8
3
8
,
5
5
4
$0 $1,838,554 25%
Ma
s
t
e
r
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
P
l
a
n
$9
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
$9
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
25
%
$2
,
3
3
1
,
9
4
4
$0 $2,331,944 25%
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
$2
5
,
7
4
0
,
0
0
0
$0
$2
5
,
7
4
0
,
0
0
0
$6
,
3
1
8
,
3
4
2
$0 $6,318,342
TO
T
A
L
$3
3
2
,
8
8
9
,
2
8
2
$3
3
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
$2
9
9
,
5
8
9
,
2
8
2
$1
5
2
,
2
3
1
,
1
4
6
$38,509,856 $113,721,290 34%
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
C-1
CITY OF EUGENE TRANSPORTATION SDC PROJECT PAPPENDIX B: MAPS
Appendix B
Maps
Image Source: Ben Garney via Wikimedia Commons
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
W 2 n d A v e
W
6 t h
A v e
W
1 1 t h A v e
W 1 3 t h
A v e
E
4 t h
A v e
E
3 r d
A v e
C
i
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
O
a
k
P
a
t
c
h
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
O
l
i
v
e
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
P
e
a
r
l
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
S
t
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
S
t
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
l
d
e
r
Agate
F r a n k l i n B l v d
W 1 8 t h A v e
S
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
W
1 3 t h
A v e
W
7 t h A v e
W
2 4 t h A v e
W
2 8 t h A v e
E
3 3 r d A v e
E
1 9 t h A v e
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
a
E
3
0
t
h
A
v
e
C r e s t
D
r
L o r a n e
H w y
C
i
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
W
2 8 t h
A v e
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
2
5
t
h
A
v
e
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
S
t
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
S
t
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
S
t
P
o
l
k
S
t
Ke
v
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
1 8 t h
A v e
W 1 8 t h A v e
G
i
m
p
l
H
i l
l
R
d
Wil
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
P
i
n
e
G
r
o
v
e
R
d
G i m p l
H i l l
R d
G
i
m
p
l
H
i
l
l
R
d
L o r a n e
H w y
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
L
o
r
a
n
e
H
w
y
W 1
1
t
h
A
v
e
S
D
a
n
e
b
o
A
v
e
B
e
l
t
l
i
n
e
H
w
y
S
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
R
d
W
1
1
t
h
A
v
e
W
1 s t
A v e
A v a l o n
S t
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
F i r e s t o n e
D r
B r i d g e s
L n
R o y a l A v e
M a r s h a l l A v e
E l m i r a
R d
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
B
l
v
d
Hwy 9
9
N
N o r t h w e s t E x p r e s s w a y
Pa
r
k
A
v
e
Ho
r
n
L
n
M i n d a
D r
W
5 t h
A v e
W
1 s t A v e
V
a
n
B
u
r
e
n
N
D
a
n
e
b
o
A
v
e
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
B o d e n h a m e r R d
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
F
i
s
h
e
r
R
d
B a r g e r D r
L
e
g
a
c
y
C l e a r L a k e R d
C l e a r
L a k e
R d
R i v e r L o o p
1
C
r
o
c
k
e
r
R
d
I r v i n g
R d
I r v i n g R d
H
y
a
c
i
n
t
h
S
t
Hu
n
s
a
k
e
r
L
n
R a n d y
P a p e
B e l t l i n e
H w y
S i l v e r L n
N o r t h w e s t E x p r e s s w a y
Pr a irie Rd
H w y 9 9 N
R i v e r Rd
B l a c k f o o t A v e
B a r s t o w
A v e
R i v e r L o o p
2
W i l k e s
D r
I r v i n g t o n
D r
L
y
n
n b r o o k Dr
S p r i n g C r e e k
D r
Riv
e
r
L
o
o
p
2
B e a c o n
D r
A w b r e y
L n
E
E n i d
R d
A i r p o r t R d
R ive r R d
S
c
e
n
i
c
D
r
Lancaster Dr
G r e e n
H i l l R d
Be
a
c
o
n
D
r
H w y 9 9 N
Green Hill Rd
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
H o w a r d
A v e
N
P a r k A v e
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
C r e s c e n t A v e
N
.
D
e
l
t
a
H
w
y
G
o
o
d p a s t u r e
L p
G
o
o
d
p
a
s
t
u
r
e
I
s
l
a
n
d
R
d
B e t h e l D r
H w y 9 9 N
R o y a l
A v e
M a x w e l l
R d
G o o d p a s t u r e
I s l a n d
R d
C o u n t y
F a r m
R d
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
J e p p e s e n A c r e s
R d
O
a
k
w
a
y
C o u n t r y C l u b R d
Ba
i
l
e
y
L
n
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
B a r g e r
D r
E
c
h
o
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
T
a
n
e
y
S
t
W
S h e l t o n M c m u r p h e y B l v d
H a r l o
w
R d
M a r t i n
L u t h e r
K i n g
J r
B l v d
L e o H a rr i s P k w y
E
1 8 t h A v e
M L K B L V D
H a r l o w
R d
W
C
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
B
l v
d
Van Duyn
F
e
r
r
y
S
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
A y r e s
G r e e n A c r e s R d
R a n d y P a p e B e l t l i n e H w y
Ca
l
Y
o
u
n
g
W
i l l a k en
z i e R d
C r e
s
c
e
n
t
A
v
e
Ga
m
e
F
a
r
m
R
d
Ch a d Dr
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
N
o
r
k
e
n
z
i
e
G
i
l
h
a
m
F a i r v i e w
F
r
a n k l
i n
B l v d
H
a
w
k
i
n
s
L
n
B
r
i
t
t
a
n
y
S
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
E d
C o n e
B l v d
Ro
o s e v e l t
B l v d
A
s
p
e
n
S
t
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
K i n s r o w
A v e
I -1 0 5
E 2 4 t h
A v e
E A m az o n Dr
E 3 0 t h A v e
Amazon Pkwy
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
H
a
r
r
i
s
S
t
T i m b e r l i n e D r
E 4
0
t
h
A
v
e
Dill ard R d
F o x H o l l o w R d
W
3 9 t h A v e
E 4 3 r d A v e
E
4
3 r
d
A v
e
A g a t e S t
E 46
t
h
A
v
e
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
D
o
n
a
l
d
S
t
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
C
r
o
w
R
d
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
S
t
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
B
r
a
e
B
u
r
n
D
r
M
c
K
i
n
l
e
y
S
t
G
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
S
t
G
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
S
t
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
S
t
P
o
l
k
S
t
M
o
n
r
o
e
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
V a l l e y
R i v e r D r
E B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
W D
S t
I -5
K
i
n
c
a
i
d
N
S
h
a
s
t
a
L
p
S
p
r
i
n
g
B
l
v
d
D illardRd
O
a
k
H
i
g
h
B l a i r B l v d
E
1 9 t h A v e
W 1
3
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
1
t
h
W
2
7
t
h
A
v
e
W 2
9
t
h
A
v
e
W A m a z on D r
F
o
x
H
o
l
l
o
w
M
c
B
e
t
h
R
d
W
1 1 t h A v e
W 5 t h A v e
W
7 t h
P l
S
e
n
e
c
a
R
d
A
r
t
h
u
r
N
S
e
n
e
c
a
R
d
W
i
l
l
a
g
i
l
l
e
s
p
i
e
R
d
Clu b
Oa
k
m
o
n
t
W
a
y
G o o d p a s t u r e I s l a n d R d
D
e
l
t
a
H
w
y
G
i
l
h
a
m
R
d
N
o
r
k
e
n
z
i
e
L
a
k
e
D
r
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
A
v
e
G
r
o
v
e
S
t
I -1 0 5
C a l Y o u n g
N
G
a
r
d
e
n
W
a
y
S
G
a
r
d
e
n
W
a
y
Game Farm Rd
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
S
t
I
-
5
R a n d y P a p e B e l t l i n e H w y
I -1 0 5
Mill St
Ama z o n P k w y
W
6
t
h
A
v
e
B
e
l
t
l
i
n
e
H
w
y
H
a
v
i
t
u
r
e
W
a
y
C
o
l
t
o
n
W 7 t h A v e
R ive r R d
D
o
n
a
l
d
S
t
Bogart
Wil
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
McK
e
n
z
i
e
V
i
e
w
D
r
Coburg R
d
La
k
e
v
i
e
w
Pa
r
k
v
i
e
w
Av
e
n
g
a
l
e
G
i
l
h
a
m
R
d
G
o
n
y
e
a
W
8 t h A v e
W
1 0 t h
A v e
E B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
MM-11
MM
-
1
9
MM
-
2
2
MM
-
1
4
M
M
-
1
2
M
M
-
1
6
MM
-
1
5
MM
-
8
MM
-
2
8
MM
-
2
1
M
M
-
2
0
MM-
1
3
M
M
-
2
7
MM
-
1
9
MM
-
2
8
39
5
Transportation SDC ProjectsCity of Eugene Street Projects Funded by Transportation SDCs 1 inch = 1.07 miles 02 1Miles Map produced by City of Eugene Public Works Engineering Information Team March 8, 2018 (1706-1800)These capital infrastructure projects to be constructed in the future will be financed using Transportation SDC funds.Legend to Map Symbols Future Street Projects Railroad Streets Water Parks & Open Space Urban Growth BoundaryEligible for SDC Credit B-
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2
2
3
55
2
2 43
2
1
2
2
2
47
5
45
9
4
8
1
6
1
0
3
7
6
19
7
21
1
5
0
8
3
9
4
4
6
4
4
9
4
6
1
5
5
5
5
21
8
23
1
3 95
19
6
56
5
12
5 96
25
6
25
8
2 55
25
0
56
0
2 21 22
0
61
3
495
6
1
2
2 59
24
9
23
0
39
0
47
2
21
9
I
5
S
B
I5 NB
HWY
9
9
N W 1
1
T
H A
VE
R IVER RD
RO
Y
A
L A
V
E
C
O
B
U
R
G
R
D
W
B
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
W 1
8
T
H A
V
E
W B
I
1 05
B
A
I
L
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
E 30 TH AVE
LO
RA
N
E
H
W
Y
C
R
O
W
R
D
H
I
L
Y
A
R
D
S
T
G
R
E
E
N
H
I
L
L
R
D
P
O
L
K
S
T
GI
M
P
L
H
I
LL
R
D
BA
R
G
E
R
D
R
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
S
S
T
W
I
L
L
A
M
E
T
T
E
S
T
RO
O
S
E
V
E
LT
B LV
D
C LE
AR
LA
KE
R
D
IR
V
IN
G
RD
I 10
5
WB
N
T
E
R
R
Y
S
T
W
7T
H
A
V
E
NOR TH WEST EX
P
R
ESSW AY
G
I
L
H
A
M
R
D
F
I
R
B
U
T
T
E
R
D
D
O
N
A
L
D
S
T
HA
RL
O
W
RD
H
I
G
H
S
T
O
A
K
S
T
BET
H
E
L DR
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
MCK
E
N
Z
I
E
VI
E
W D
R
E
1
9T
H
AV
E
AW
B
RE
Y L
N
W
13
T
H
A
V
E
S
B
E
R
T
E
L
S
E
N
R
D
W
D
ST
P
E
A
R
L
S
T
CR
E
S
C
E
N
T A
V
E
F
I
S
H
E
R
R
D
W
1S
T A
VE
E
18
T
H
AV
E
H
A
W
K
I
N
S
L
N
H
A
R
R
I
S
S
T
CA
L Y
O UN
G
RD
IR
V
I
N
G
TO
N
D
R
L
I
N
C
O
L
N
S
T
C
I
T
Y
V
I
E
W
S
T
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
S
T
CHA
D D
R
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
RI
V
E
R
A
VE
M
C
B
E
T
H
R
D
EL
MI
R
A
R
D
A
G
A
T
E
S
T
S
2
N
D
S
T
H
Y
A
C
I
N
T
H
S
T
S
A
S
T
W
7
TH
PL
N
P
A
R
K
A
V
E
HO
R
N
LN
P
I
N
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
CR
E
S
T
D
R
WI
L KE
S
D
R
G
A
R
F
I
E
L
D
S
T
AI
R
P
O RT
R
D
O
A
K
W
A
Y
R
D
DI LLARD RD
PA
R
K
A
VE
N GAME
F ARM RD
B OD
E NH
A ME
R
R
D
T
A
N
E
Y
S
T
HO
W
A
R
D
A
VE
A
S
P
E
N
S
T
Q S
T
D IV
I SI ON
AV
E
RI
VE
R
L
O
OP
2
S
C
E
N
I
C
D
R
AV
A
LO
N
S
T
A
L
D
E
R
S
T
WI
LL
A
KE
NZ
I E
RD
F
R
I
E
N
D
L
Y
S
T
BE
A
C
O
N
D
R
C
R
O
C
K
E
R
R
D
FA
IR
V
IE
W
D
R
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N
S
T
H UN
S
AK
E
R
L
N
SE
AV
EY
L
O
O
P
R
D
LY
NN
B
R
O
O
K
D
R
A
U
G
U
S
T
A
S
T
S
W
I
L
L
A
M
E
T
T
E
S
T
W
C EN
T EN
N
IA
L
B
L
V
D
E
C
H
O
H
O
L
L
O
W
R
D
S
D
A
N
E
B
O
A
V
E
N
D
E
L
T
A
H
W
Y
SI
LV
ER
LN
AY
R
ES
RD
BA
IL
E
Y
LN
L
A
K
E
D
R
L
E
G
A
C
Y
S
T
L
A
U
R
A
S
T
C
O
U
N
T
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
TIM BE RL IN E DR
E
33
RD
A
VE
O
L
I
V
E
S
T
E
P
E
A
R
L
S
T
E D
C
O
N
E
B
LV
D
W
I
L
L
O
W
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
E 4
3R
D
A
VE
B
R
A
E
B
U
R
N
D
R
R
A
I
N
B
O
W
D
R
MI
N
DA
D
R
CO
U
NT
RY
C
L
UB
R
D
G
R
O
V
E
S
T
W
5
T
H
A
VE
JE
P
P
E
S
E
N
A
CR
E
S
R
D
O
A
K
P
A
T
C
H
R
D
W
2
5
TH
AV
E
C UB IT ST
SATRE ST
I 5 N B ON RP
E E
N ID
R
D
MA
XW
E LL
R
D
M
E
N
L
O
L
P
MILL S T
AV
E
N
GA
LE
D
R
D
I
L
L
A
R
D
R
D
H
W
Y
9
9
N
P RAIRI E RD
CO
B
U
R
G
RD
BE
L
T
LI
NE
R
D
A
G
A
T
E
S
T
W
7
TH
A
V
E
W
1S
T
AV
E
I5 NB
G
R
E
E
N
H
I
L
L
R
D
BE
A
CO
N
D
R
W
5
T H
AV
E
39
5
Transportation SDC ProjectsCity of Eugene Pedestrian Facilities Funded by Transportation SDCs 1 inch = 1.07 miles 02 1Miles Map produced by City of Eugene Public Works Engineering Information Team March 8, 2018 (1706-1800)These capital infrastructure projects to be constructed within the next 20 years will be financed using Transportation SDC funds.Legend to Map Symbols Proposed Pedestrian Improvements Shared Use Path Sidewalk Path Accessways Grade Separated Crossing Streets Railroad Water Parks & Open Space Urban Growth Boundary
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
5
2
6
4
4
6
1
1
0
6
6
6
1
2
2
3
4
6
5
4
5
5
2
3
9
3
2 4 3
3
9
3 9 1
3
1
6 1 4
4
0
0
4
1
2 2 9
3 8 7
4 5
4 5
3
6 0 7
1
4
1
5
9
1
2 1 1
5 2
3
1
0
7
1
6
3
5
8
8
1 1 4
1 1 4
1
8
5
5
6
4
4
1
5
3
1 5 7
4
3
1 0 5
1 3 1
5
9
3
5 9
5
1
6
1
4
6
1
5
6
1
2
1
1
3
9
6
0
5
4 6 0
6 0 8
4
5
2
4 8 2
5 7 1
6
0
6
5
8
3
7
7
1
3
5
5
3
4 5 1
5
8
9
5
7
5
6 0
9
7
3
4 4 5
7
4
4 8 8
1 5 5
4 5 5
4 8 6
4 5 9
3
8
1 5 9
5 9 7
1
1
1
6 0
9
5
5
9
9
1
3
6
1 3 0
3 8
9
4
9
5
6
3
2
2
2
4 5 8
5 7 8
4
9
2
4
4
7
6
0
1
5 7 7
3 9
7
6
1
0
3 8 6
1 4 6
3
7
6
5
5
4
5
9
2
1 6 7
1 9 7
4
7
5
5
7
9
4
2
1
2
7
4
4
9
1
2
6
5 4 7
1
2
8
3
7
4
8
5
3
9
2
7
5
5 6
4
5
0
3
5
8
7
7
1
1 6 8
1
6
2
5 4 8
3
8
1
3 9 4
5 4 4
1 5 8
4
6
4
4
9
4
2
2
6
5
2
8
5 7 4
1
3
8
5
6
8
3 8 8
5
5
5
1
2
4
1 0 9
2
1
8
5
8
0
5
9
8
5
7
6
5 4 2
5
9
2 3 1
3
9
5
1
9
6
5
8
2
2 5 6
2
5
8
1 3 4
2
5
5
1
2
9
6 0 0
505
5
4
6
1 2 5
5
4
5
3
9
8
5
7
2
2 5 0
5 6 0
1 3 7
2
2
1
2
2
0
8
6
2
5
9
2 3
0
4
7
2
12
59
6
61
3
61
2
24
9
39
0
5 0
8
6
3
5 6 5
6
1
5
4 8
1
I5 SB
I5 NB
HWY
9
9
N
RIVER RD
W
1
1
T
H
A
V
E
WB
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
W
1
8
T
H
A
V
E
WB
I
1
0
5
B
A
I
L
E
Y
H
I
L
L
R
D
EB
I
1
0
5
RO
Y
A
L
A
V
E
E 3
0
T
H
A
V
E
LO
R
A
N
E
H
W
Y
C
R
O
W
R
D
H
I
L
Y
A
R
D
S
T
G
R
E
E
N
H
I
L
L
R
D
P
O
L
K
S
T
BA
R
G
E
R
D
R
C
H
A
M
B
E
R
S
S
T
W
I
L
L
A
M
E
T
T
E
S
T
E
B
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
I1
0
5
E
B
F
O
X
H
O
L
L
O
W
R
D
RO
O
S
E
V
E
L
T
B
L
V
D
CL
E
A
R
L
A
K
E
R
D
IR
V
I
N
G
R
D
I1
0
5
W
B
N
T
E
R
R
Y
S
T
W
7
T
H
A
V
E
NORTHW
E
S
T
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
Y
HA
R
L
O
W
R
D
G
I
L
H
A
M
R
D
S
B
D
E
L
T
A
H
W
Y
NB DELT
A
H
W
Y
P
R
A
I
R
I
E
R
D
AW
B
R
E
Y
L
N
S
W
I
L
L
A
M
E
T
T
E
S
T
S
B
E
R
T
E
L
S
E
N
R
D
MA
X
W
E
L
L
R
D
W
D
S
T
CR
E
S
C
E
N
T
A
V
E
W
1
S
T
A
V
E
AI
R
P
O
R
T
R
D
CO
B
U
R
G
R
D
CA
L
Y
O
U
N
G
R
D
IR
V
I
N
G
T
O
N
D
R
C
I
T
Y
V
I
E
W
S
T
G
A
T
E
W
A
Y
S
T
CH
A
D
D
R
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
A
G
A
T
E
S
T
S
2
N
D
S
T
I1
0
5
S
A
S
T
W
7
T
H
P
L
P
I
N
E
G
R
O
V
E
R
D
CR
E
S
T
D
R
WI
L
K
E
S
D
R
DILLARD RD
W
2
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
E
N
E
C
A
R
D
N GAM
E
F
A
R
M
R
D
Q
S
T
N
O
R
K
E
N
Z
I
E
R
D DONALD ST
A
S
P
E
N
S
T
FA
I
R
V
I
E
W
D
R
HU
N
S
A
K
E
R
L
N
W
C
E
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
B
L
V
D
E
S
T
E
C
H
O
H
O
L
L
O
W
R
D
MA
R
T
I
N
L
U
T
H
E
R
K
I
N
G
J
R
B
L
V
D
H
A
W
K
I
N
S
L
N
W
2
N
D
A
V
E
S
D
A
N
E
B
O
A
V
E
N
C
O
B
U
R
G
R
D
N
D
E
L
T
A
H
W
Y
SI
L
V
E
R
L
N
I5
N
B
C
O
N
N
AY
R
E
S
R
D
N
D
A
N
E
B
O
A
V
E
L
E
G
A
C
Y
S
T
SB I5 O
N
R
P
CO
U
N
T
Y
F
A
R
M
R
D
B
S
T
H
W
Y
9
9
S
E
P
E
A
R
L
S
T
ED
C
O
N
E
B
L
V
D
G
O
N
Y
E
A
R
D
W
I
L
L
O
W
C
R
E
E
K
R
D
W
5
T
H
A
V
E
RAIL
R
O
A
D
B
L
V
D
I5 NB O
N
R
P
S
G
A
R
D
E
N
W
A
Y
E
E
N
I
D
R
D
A
R
T
H
U
R
S
T
GA
M
E
F
A
R
M
R
D
I5 SB O
N
R
A
M
P
I5
N
B
O
F
F
R
A
M
P
M
E
N
L
O
L
P
CE
N
T
E
N
N
I
A
L
B
L
V
D
GOODPAS
T
U
R
E
L
P
I105 WB CO
N
N
IN
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
W
A
Y
MILL ST
W V
A
N
D
U
Y
N
S
T
GAME FARM RD
H
W
Y
9
9
N
I5 SB
PRAIRIE RD
G
A
M
E
F
A
R
M
R
D
W
5
T
H
A
V
E
I5 NB
EB
B
E
L
T
L
I
N
E
R
D
E
E
N
I
D
R
D
7
1
57
2
52
3
Map produced by City of Eugene Public Works Engineering Information Team March 8, 2018 (1706-1800)These capital infrastructure projects to be constructed within the next 20 years will be financed using Transportation SDC funds.City of Eugene Transportation SDC Projects 1 inch = 1.32 miles 02 .5 1.25MilesBicycle Facilities Funded by Transportation SDCs Legend to Map Symbols Proposed Bicycle Improvements Bike Lane Protected Bike Lane Shared Use Path Sidewalk Path Neighborhood Greenways Accessways Grade Separated Crossing Streets Railroad Waterbodies Parks & Open Space Urban Growth Boundary B-
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
W 2 n d A v e
W
6 t h
A v e
W
1 1 t h A v e
W 1 3 t h
A v e
E
4 t h
A v e
E
3 r d
A v e
C
i
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
O
a
k
P
a
t
c
h
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
O
l
i
v
e
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
P
e
a
r
l
P
a
t
t
e
r
s
o
n
S
t
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
S
t
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
l
d
e
r
Agate
F r a n k l i n B l v d
W 1 8 t h A v e
S
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
W
1 3 t h
A v e
W
7 t h A v e
W
2 4 t h A v e
W
2 8 t h A v e
E
3 3 r d A v e
E
1 9 t h A v e
C
o
l
u
m
b
i
a
E
3
0
t
h
A
v
e
C r e s t
D
r
L o r a n e
H w y
C
i
t
y
V
i
e
w
S
t
W
2 8 t h
A v e
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
2
5
t
h
A
v
e
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
S
t
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
S
t
F
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
S
t
P
o
l
k
S
t
Ke
v
i
n
g
t
o
n
A
v
e
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
1 8 t h
A v e
W 1 8 t h A v e
G
i
m
p
l
H
i l
l
R
d
Wil
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
P
i
n
e
G
r
o
v
e
R
d
G i m p l
H i l l
R d
G
i
m
p
l
H
i
l
l
R
d
L o r a n e
H w y
B
a
i
l
e
y
H
i
l
l
R
d
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
L
o
r
a
n
e
H
w
y
W 1
1
t
h
A
v
e
S
D
a
n
e
b
o
A
v
e
B
e
l
t
l
i
n
e
H
w
y
S
B
e
r
t
e
l
s
e
n
R
d
W
1
1
t
h
A
v
e
W
1 s t
A v e
A v a l o n
S t
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
F i r e s t o n e
D r
B r i d g e s
L n
R o y a l A v e
M a r s h a l l A v e
E l m i r a
R d
Ro
o
s
e
v
e
l
t
B
l
v
d
Hwy 9
9
N
N o r t h w e s t E x p r e s s w a y
Pa
r
k
A
v
e
Ho
r
n
L
n
M i n d a
D r
W
5 t h
A v e
W
1 s t A v e
V
a
n
B
u
r
e
n
N
D
a
n
e
b
o
A
v
e
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
B o d e n h a m e r R d
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
F
i
r
B
u
t
t
e
R
d
F
i
s
h
e
r
R
d
B a r g e r D r
L
e
g
a
c
y
C l e a r L a k e R d
C l e a r
L a k e
R d
R i v e r L o o p
1
C
r
o
c
k
e
r
R
d
I r v i n g
R d
I r v i n g R d
H
y
a
c
i
n
t
h
S
t
Hu
n
s
a
k
e
r
L
n
R a n d y
P a p e
B e l t l i n e
H w y
S i l v e r L n
N o r t h w e s t E x p r e s s w a y
Pr a irie Rd
H w y 9 9 N
R i v e r Rd
B l a c k f o o t A v e
B a r s t o w
A v e
R i v e r L o o p
2
W i l k e s
D r
I r v i n g t o n
D r
L
y
n
n b r o o k Dr
S p r i n g C r e e k
D r
Riv
e
r
L
o
o
p
2
B e a c o n
D r
A w b r e y
L n
E
E n i d
R d
A i r p o r t R d
R ive r R d
S
c
e
n
i
c
D
r
Lancaster Dr
G r e e n
H i l l R d
Be
a
c
o
n
D
r
H w y 9 9 N
Green Hill Rd
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
H o w a r d
A v e
N
P a r k A v e
N
T
e
r
r
y
S
t
C r e s c e n t A v e
N
.
D
e
l
t
a
H
w
y
G
o
o
d p a s t u r e
L p
G
o
o
d
p
a
s
t
u
r
e
I
s
l
a
n
d
R
d
B e t h e l D r
H w y 9 9 N
R o y a l
A v e
M a x w e l l
R d
G o o d p a s t u r e
I s l a n d
R d
C o u n t y
F a r m
R d
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
J e p p e s e n A c r e s
R d
O
a
k
w
a
y
C o u n t r y C l u b R d
Ba
i
l
e
y
L
n
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
B a r g e r
D r
E
c
h
o
H
o
l
l
o
w
R
d
T
a
n
e
y
S
t
W
S h e l t o n M c m u r p h e y B l v d
H a r l o
w
R d
M a r t i n
L u t h e r
K i n g
J r
B l v d
L e o H a rr i s P k w y
E
1 8 t h A v e
M L K B L V D
H a r l o w
R d
W
C
e
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
B
l v
d
Van Duyn
F
e
r
r
y
S
t
B
r
i
d
g
e
A y r e s
G r e e n A c r e s R d
R a n d y P a p e B e l t l i n e H w y
Ca
l
Y
o
u
n
g
W
i l l a k en
z i e R d
C r e
s
c
e
n
t
A
v
e
Ga
m
e
F
a
r
m
R
d
Ch a d Dr
C
o
b
u
r
g
R
d
N
o
r
k
e
n
z
i
e
G
i
l
h
a
m
F a i r v i e w
F
r
a n k l
i n
B l v d
H
a
w
k
i
n
s
L
n
B
r
i
t
t
a
n
y
S
t
W
i
l
l
o
w
C
r
e
e
k
R
d
E d
C o n e
B l v d
Ro
o s e v e l t
B l v d
A
s
p
e
n
S
t
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
K i n s r o w
A v e
I -1 0 5
E 2 4 t h
A v e
E A m az o n Dr
E 3 0 t h A v e
Amazon Pkwy
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
H
a
r
r
i
s
S
t
T i m b e r l i n e D r
E 4
0
t
h
A
v
e
Dill ard R d
F o x H o l l o w R d
W
3 9 t h A v e
E 4 3 r d A v e
E
4
3 r
d
A v
e
A g a t e S t
E 46
t
h
A
v
e
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
D
o
n
a
l
d
S
t
H
i
l
y
a
r
d
C
r
o
w
R
d
G
r
e
e
n
H
i
l
l
R
d
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
S
t
W
i
l
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
B
r
a
e
B
u
r
n
D
r
M
c
K
i
n
l
e
y
S
t
G
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
S
t
G
a
r
f
i
e
l
d
S
t
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
s
S
t
P
o
l
k
S
t
M
o
n
r
o
e
W
a
s
h
i
n
g
t
o
n
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
V a l l e y
R i v e r D r
E B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
W D
S t
I -5
K
i
n
c
a
i
d
N
S
h
a
s
t
a
L
p
S
p
r
i
n
g
B
l
v
d
D illardRd
O
a
k
H
i
g
h
B l a i r B l v d
E
1 9 t h A v e
W 1
3
t
h
A
v
e
W
1
1
t
h
W
2
7
t
h
A
v
e
W 2
9
t
h
A
v
e
W A m a z on D r
F
o
x
H
o
l
l
o
w
M
c
B
e
t
h
R
d
W
1 1 t h A v e
W 5 t h A v e
W
7 t h
P l
S
e
n
e
c
a
R
d
A
r
t
h
u
r
N
S
e
n
e
c
a
R
d
W
i
l
l
a
g
i
l
l
e
s
p
i
e
R
d
Clu b
Oa
k
m
o
n
t
W
a
y
G o o d p a s t u r e I s l a n d R d
D
e
l
t
a
H
w
y
G
i
l
h
a
m
R
d
N
o
r
k
e
n
z
i
e
L
a
k
e
D
r
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
N
P
a
r
k
A
v
e
F
a
i
r
f
i
e
l
d
A
v
e
G
r
o
v
e
S
t
I -1 0 5
C a l Y o u n g
N
G
a
r
d
e
n
W
a
y
S
G
a
r
d
e
n
W
a
y
Game Farm Rd
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
S
t
I
-
5
R a n d y P a p e B e l t l i n e H w y
I -1 0 5
Mill St
Ama z o n P k w y
W
6
t
h
A
v
e
B
e
l
t
l
i
n
e
H
w
y
H
a
v
i
t
u
r
e
W
a
y
C
o
l
t
o
n
W 7 t h A v e
R ive r R d
D
o
n
a
l
d
S
t
Bogart
Wil
l
a
m
e
t
t
e
S
t
McK
e
n
z
i
e
V
i
e
w
D
r
Coburg R
d
La
k
e
v
i
e
w
Pa
r
k
v
i
e
w
Av
e
n
g
a
l
e
G
i
l
h
a
m
R
d
G
o
n
y
e
a
W
8 t h A v e
W
1 0 t h
A v e
E B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
MM-11
MM
-
1
9
MM
-
2
2
MM
-
1
4
M
M
-
1
2
M
M
-
1
6
MM
-
1
5
MM
-
8
MM
-
2
8
MM
-
2
1
M
M
-
2
5
M
M
-
2
0
MM-
1
3
M
M
-
2
7
MM
-
1
9
MM
-
2
8
39
5
Transportation SDC ProjectsCity of Eugene Street Projects Funded by Transportation SDCs 1 inch = 1.07 miles 02 1Miles Map produced by City of Eugene Public Works Engineering Information Team March 8, 2018 (1706-1800)These capital infrastructure projects to be constructed in the future will be financed using Transportation SDC funds.Legend to Map Symbols Future Street Projects Railroad Streets Water Parks & Open Space Urban Growth BoundaryEligible for SDC Credit B-
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT CHARGE METHODOLOGIES (GENERAL
METHODOLOGY AND APPENDICES A, B AND F) ORIGINALLY
ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 4900.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds as follows:
A. The City of Eugene System Development Charge Methodologies document was
adopted by Resolution No. 4900, effective on May 7, 2007 and has subsequently been amended,
most recently by Resolution No. 5100 on January 27, 2014.
B. The amendments to the System Development Charge (SDC) Methodologies made
by this resolution include:
1. Modifications to the General Methodology in order to clarify text that
pertains to the implementation of existing SDC Methodology documents and update the
text that pertains to the proposed Transportation Methodology.
2. Modifications to the Appendix A “Definitions of General Terms and
Transportation Use Codes” in order to update the definitions of general terms referenced
in the current and proposed SDC Methodology documents.
3. Modifications to the Appendix B “Transportation System Development
Charge System-Specific Methodology and Details” in order to insert text that describes the
proposed Transportation Methodology and clarify portions of the existing methodology
that will remain in the proposed Transportation Methodology.
4. Modifications to the Appendix F “Local SDC System Formulas and General
Fee Schedule” in order to update the formulas and rates that pertain to the proposed
Transportation Methodology.
C. The Eugene City Council held a public hearing on June 18, 2018 to accept public
testimony on the amendments to the SDC Methodologies made by this Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. The amendments to the City of Eugene System Development Charge
Methodologies shown in Exhibit A to this Resolution are adopted and include amendments to:
A. The General Methodology;
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
B. Appendix A (“Definitions of General Terms and Transportation Use Codes
& Cross-References for Wastewater & Parks SDCs Based Upon HUD BPR Use Codes
Descriptions”);
C. Appendix B (“Transportation System Development Charge System-
Specific Methodology and Details”); and
D. Appendix F (“Local SDC System Formulas and General Fee Schedule”).
Section 2. The unamended portions of the City of Eugene System Development Charge
Methodologies, including the entirety of Appendices C, D and E, remain in full force and effect.
Section 3. In order to phase-in the increased transportation system development charge,
beginning on January 1, 2019, the City will apply a cost per trip of $2692.63 in determining
transportation system development charges. Beginning on January 1, 2020, the City will apply
the full cost per trip consistent with Appendix F to the SDC Methodology.
Section 4. This Resolution shall become effective on January 1, 2019.
Section 5. The City Recorder, at the request of or with the consent of the City Attorney,
is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained in Exhibit A to this
Resolution.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the _____ of __________________, 2018.
__________________________ _________
City Recorder
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
City of Eugene
System Development Charge Methodologies
General Methodology
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Eugene System Development Charges
General
General Methodology .............................................................................................................. 1
Figure G-1 ...... Rate-Setting Methodology ............................................................................ 16
Table G-1 ....... Potential Impact Reductions and Credits ....................................................... 17
Appendix A ..... Definitions of General Terms and Transportation Use Codes ....................... A-1
Cross References for Wastewater & Parks SDCs ..................................... A-19
Appendix F ..... Local System Formulas and General Fee Schedule .................................... F-1
Transportation
Appendix B ..... Transportation System Charge Methodology and Details ............................ B-1
Table B1.......... Model Vehicle Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Ends ..................................... B-2
Table B2.......... Reimbursement Fee ................................................................................... B-4
Table B3.......... Improvement Fee ....................................................................................... B-7
Table B4.......... Existing and Future Bike and Pedestrian Facilities ..................................... B-9
Table B5.......... Population Growth ...................................................................................... B-9
Table B6.......... Existing and Planned LOS ........................................................................ B-10
Table B7.......... Existing and Growth Capacity Needs for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities B-10
Table B8.......... Existing and Growth Share of Stand-Alone Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvements .................................................................................................................. B-11
Table B10........ Compact Development Adjustments ......................................................... B-20
Wastewater
Local
Appendix C1…Local Wastewater System Charge Methodology and Details ...................... C-1
Table 6 ............ Local Wastewater System Development Charge Analysis .......................... C-4
Table 7 ............ Local Wastewater Plumbing Fixture Unit Rates ........................................... C-5
Figure 4 .......... Local Wastewater System ........................................................................... C-6
Regional
Appendix C2… Regional Wastewater System Charge Methodology and Details ................ C-7
Stormwater
Appendix D ..... Stormwater System Charge Methodology and Details ................................ D-1
Figure 5 .......... Stormwater System .................................................................................... D-6
Table 8 ............ Stormwater System Development Charge Analysis..................................... D-7
Table 9 ............ Stormwater SDC-Eligible Project List ......................................................... D-8
Parks – next page
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
TABLE OF CONTENTS - continued
City of Eugene Systems Development Charges
Parks
Appendix E ..... Parks System Charge Methodology and Details ......................................... E-1
Figure 6 .......... Parks System ........................................................................................... . E-3
Table 10 .......... Land Acquisition & Development Capacity Analysis by Park Type .............. E-4
Table 11 .......... Capacity Analysis & Project List Allocations for Facilities ............................ E-5
Table 12 .......... Determination of Growth Capacity Needs for Neighborhood Parks ............. E-7
Table 13 .......... Reimbursement Fee Cost Basis .................................................................. E-8
Table 14 .......... Improvement Fee Cost Basis ...................................................................... E-9
Table 15 .......... Allocation of Project list Acreage/Cost ....................................................... E-17
Table 16 .......... System-Wide Unit Costs; Res. & Nonres. Develop. per Component ......... E-18
Table 17 .......... SDC Schedule ........................................................................................... E-19
Table 18 .......... Avg. Number Persons per Structure Type (Grouped), 2000 US Census ... E-20
Table 19 .......... Summary of Nonresidential SDC Classes ................................................. E-21
Formulas & Fee Schedule
Appendix F ..... Local System Formulas & General Fee Schedule ....................................... F-1
Table B9.......... Transportation Trip Rates ............................................................................ F-4
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
GENERAL METHODOLOGY
City of Eugene Systems Development Charges
1.0 Introduction
The City’s authority to establish and adopt system development charges (SDCs) is granted by
the Eugene Charter of 1976 and by ORS 223.297 - 223.314. By virtue of that authority, the City
adopted Eugene Code, 1971 sections 7.700 - 7.740 and related provisions.
For the purpose of interpreting Eugene Code, 1971 sections 7.700 through 7.740 and this
document, the public record before the Council shall constitute the legislative history.
In addition to the general methodology for each system contained herein, the following
appendices are adopted and made a part hereof:
A: Definitions of General Terms and Use Codes; and Cross Reference of
Wastewater/Parks SDC / HUD BPR Use Codes
B: Transportation System Charge Detail
C1: Local Wastewater System Charge Detail
C2: Regional Wastewater System Charge Detail
D: Stormwater System Charge Detail
E: Parks System Charge Detail
F: Local System Formulas and General Fee Schedule
1.1 Basis for Charge
Systems Development Charges (SDCs) have been collected and used by the City of Eugene
since 1978. They are presently collected on all new development in the City and are used to
fund that portion of the construction of infrastructure (i.e., transportation, wastewater,
stormwater and parks system components) required to support new development. These SDCs
help the City provide for increased capacity needs, and recoup a portion of the community's
investment in specific infrastructure reserve capacity that is already in place.
Sound planning requires future demands on each system be anticipated, and that reserve
capacity needed to serve future users be built in. By preparing for this growth, standards for
community infrastructure are maintained and the community can prosper with new
development.
The Metropolitan Area General Plan and amendments provide a basis for planning of growth
and development and includes the following goals and policies related to the financing of new
development:
Generally reduce public subsidy for utilities and facilities in new development
(#5, p. III-G-5).
In general, the amount of public subsidy for public utilities, services and facilities,
including schools in new development, shall be reduced (#1, p. III-G-5).
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
In addition, City Council adopted Growth Management Study (GMS) policies to provide direction
for provision of infrastructure services related to new development:
GMS Policy #14: Development shall be required to pay the full cost of extending infrastructure
and services, except that the City will examine ways to subsidize the costs of providing
infrastructure or offer other incentives that support higher-density, in-fill, mixed-use, and
redevelopment.
1.2 SDC Charges
The SDCs and the associated administrative charges, impact reductions, credits, and compact
development adjustments imposed by Eugene Code, 1971 sections 7.700 through 7.740 shall
be determined as set forth in these methodologies. The current rates of charge for each system
are listed in the adopted SDC fee schedule in Appendix F. Methods for calculating each of the
following items are located in this General Methodology, in the noted sections:
Administrative Charge Costs – Section 2.3.1
Impact Reductions – Sections 7.0 – 7.1
Credits – Sections 7.0 and 7.2
Compact Development Adjustments – Sections 7.0 and 7.3
2.0 General Approach
This section outlines the general approach taken in calculating the City's development charges
and in determining and specifying appropriate expenditures of SDC revenue. For the purposes
of this document, the definitions in the Eugene Code, 1971 shall apply unless expressly
provided to the contrary. Appendix A contains definitions of words and phrases which are used
throughout these methodologies.
2.1 Assignment of Use Classifications
Developments will be assigned use classifications that best reflect the developments’ use per
system (transportation, wastewater, stormwater, parks) as set forth in these methodologies.
Different functional areas within the floor area space of a single use or tenant are not charged
separately based upon the jobs performed in those functional areas (e.g., office, break room,
shipping, storage room); rather, functional areas within a single use or tenant are assessed as a
part of the overall use. If multiple uses are proposed and/or exist within one development, a
single use classification may be assigned, as consistent with the definitions of transportation
use codes adopted in Appendix A.
In the case of multiple uses that are proposed and/or exist within one development, a single use
classification will be assigned for SDC fee and credit calculations where that single use
classification accurately describes the multiple uses (e.g., the “General Office Building” use
classification may be assigned for a development that includes restaurants, retail, and
warehousing).
2.2 SDC Applicability
Permits for development on a site shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
development will result in an increase in the usage of any capital improvement or will create the
need for additional capital improvements. Development that will have such an impact will be
charged SDCs and associated administrative charges. SDC administrative charges shall be
charged per Section 2.3.1, Administrative Costs.
To simplify the administration of the SDC, no development involving then-existing improvements
on a site will be deemed to increase usage of or create the need for additional capital
improvements until one of the following occurs:
For property improved with a residential use (e.g. single-family dwelling, duplex or other
multiple-family use), when:
An additional dwelling unit is created,
There is an increase in square footage of living area, or
All or part of any structure on the site is changed to a use not permitted outright in
any residential zoning district as noted in Eugene Code, 1971 section 9.2740.
For all property improved with a nonresidential use (e.g. recreation center, convenience
market), when:
An additional dwelling unit is created,
There is an increase in square footage of gross floor space or living area,
There is an increase in the number of nonresidential plumbing fixture units on the
site,
60 square feet of impervious surface is added to the site (for the purpose of
calculating the stormwater SDC), or
Either 3,000 or more square feet of floor space in a building changes use or 50% or
more of the gross floor space of the building changes use.
An additional connection to, or an increase in the size of, an existing connection to the
public wastewater or stormwater system is to be made.
A property previously granted an exemption for housing for low-income persons is
subsequently used for other than housing for low income persons, subject to the
limitations and/or conditions imposed in Eugene Code, 1971 section 7.725(c).
2.3 General Method for City of Eugene SDC Rates
The intent of the methodology is that new development should be charged an equitable share of
system facility costs. Additional capacity needs are determined using the City's planned levels
of service. If the planned level of service is higher than the existing level of service, new
development will not be charged to remedy the deficiency associated with providing service for
existing system users.
The general approach used to calculate the development charge for various systems is based
on requirements set forth in ORS 223.304:
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Reimbursement fees must be established or modified by ordinance or resolution setting
forth a methodology that is, when applicable, based on:
(A) Ratemaking principles employed to finance publicly owned capital
improvements;
(B) Prior contributions by existing users;
(C) Gifts or grants from federal or state government or private persons;
(D) The value of unused capacity available to future users or the cost of the existing
facilities; and
(E) Other relevant factors identified by the local government imposing the fee.
The methodology for establishing or modifying a reimbursement fee must promote the
objective of future system users contributing no more than an equitable share to the cost
of existing facilities and it must be available for public inspection.
Improvement fees must be established or modified by ordinance or resolution setting
forth a methodology that is available for pubic inspection and demonstrates
consideration of:
(A) The projected cost of the capital improvements identified in the plan and list
adopted pursuant to ORS 223.309 that are needed to increase the capacity of
the systems to which the fee is related; and
(B) The need for increased capacity in the system to which the fee is related that
will be required to serve the demands placed on the system by future users.
Credits are required for "qualified public improvements."
This general approach is illustrated in Figure G-1 and can be outlined in the following steps:
Determine System Service Characteristics.
System consists of several components (e.g., lines, pump stations, force mains, and
manholes are components of the wastewater system).
Establish impact measure - that feature of development that best reflects use of
system capacity (e.g., trips for the transportation system, impervious surface for the
stormwater system, etc.).
Determine System Value, including associated costs such as design, construction, right-
of-way acquisition and project administration.
Use replacement cost (current construction costs).
Determine capacity-oriented cost of system, net of assessments and grants.
Determine portion of system value attributable to servicing the needs of future
development.
Allocate the system value to the unit of impact (e.g., cost per unit of impervious area for
stormwater system).
Determine the service impact of specific development types (e.g., single-family dwelling,
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
motel, convenience market).
2.3.1 Administrative Costs
Administrative costs are estimated annually and include the periodic and on-going direct
and indirect costs associated with complying with the requirements of state law and the
costs of processing and administering the SDCs. An administrative charge shall be
incurred when one of the following occurs:
When a redevelopment occurs that changes the use of a building in its entirety
and it is determined that usage of any capital improvement is increased or there
is need of additional capital improvements.
The administrative charge will be calculated either as a percentage rate of the
net charge after credits for previous use, compact development adjustments, and
impact reductions are applied, or at a flat rate, whichever is higher, as listed in
the SDC fee schedule in Appendix F.
When a redevelopment permit application (other than for redevelopment that
changes the use of a building in its entirety) requires a review to determine that
there will be no increased usage of any capital improvement and no additional
capital improvements will be needed.
The administrative charge will be applied at a flat rate as listed in the SDC fee
schedule in Appendix F.
When an SDC is imposed for all other development:
The administrative charge will be calculated either as a percentage rate of the net
charge after credits for previous use, compact development adjustments, and
impact reductions are applied, or at a flat rate, whichever is higher, as listed in the
SDC fee schedule in Appendix F.
In no case will administrative charges be refunded, unless necessary as a result of City
error. Additional review fees (e.g., supplemental information permit review fees) may be
incurred for additional city staff review time needed when permit plans are changed or new
SDC-related information is provided after the initial SDC review has been completed.
2.3.2 Maximum Administrative Charge
An administrative charge shall not exceed a maximum amount of $30,000.00 for a single
permit issued. If multiple permits are issued for different phases of the same development,
the maximum administrative charge shall be applied to each permit independently.
2.4 Amendment to the SDC Methodology and Fees
Amendments to the SDC methodologies shall be made by resolution of the city council except as
follows. An amendment to the methodology that changes the amount of a reimbursement fee or an
improvement fee may be made by an administrative order of the city manager pursuant to section
2.020 of the Eugene Code, 1971, so long as the fees are not increased by more than five (5)
percent within any 12-month period, and only if the change is based on either:
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
The periodic application of the cost index described in 2.4.1, or
A change in the costs of materials, labor or real property applied to projects or project
capacity on a project list adopted pursuant to ORS 223.309.
2.4.1 Adopted Cost Index
The 20-city national average construction cost index, as published by Engineering News-
Record (ENR), shall be used when preparing periodic cost index adjustments.
2.5 Expending City of Eugene SDCs
Improvement fee revenue may be spent only on capacity increasing capital improvements included
on the adopted capital improvement lists, as defined in Eugene Code 1971 section 7.715(2), or debt
related to such improvements. Reimbursement fee revenue may be spent only on capital
improvements associated with the systems for which the fees are assessed and debt related to
such improvements. Revenue from both types of fees may be expended on direct costs of
complying with related state statutes.
3.0 Transportation System
The Transportation Systems Development Charge (SDC) is made up of several components. The
costs of these components include the total cost of design, construction, right-of-way acquisition,
purchasing, testing, and project administration. The components included in this analysis are:
Collector and arterial streets
Non-assessable linear section construction costs, including, but not limited to, on-
street bike lanes and greenways
Intersection construction costs
Traffic signal costs
Street light costs
Bridge and other structure construction costs
Off-street bicycle and multi-use paths
Path construction costs
Path light costs
The cost impacts of new development on these components are allocated on the basis of p.m. peak
hour traffic on adjacent streets using either the trips specified in the Standard Calculation or based
upon an Alternate Calculation as set forth in Appendix B.
The detailed Cost of Service formula as well as the cost per trip for each component of the
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
transportation system is set forth in Appendix B. The cost per trip is the sum of all transportation
system components identified in Appendix B.
The transportation SDC for a proposed development is determined by multiplying the units which
describe the impact by the trip rate (to determine the number of trips assigned to the proposed
development) using the Transportation Trip Rates table and the cost per trip in the current adopted
SDC fee schedule in Appendix F.
4.0 Local (City) and Regional Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC)
Regional Wastewater Systems
Collection of the wastewater SDC includes both a local (City) and regional (MWMC) system charge.
4.1 Local Wastewater System
The local wastewater SDC is based upon estimated wastewater flow discharge (impact on and/or use
of system capacity) from various development types. A unit cost of capacity in terms of cost per gallon
per day is established and used to determine SDC rates. For residential development the rate is
based on number of dwelling units and area of living space. For nonresidential development the rate is
based on number of PFUs and the proposed development type. The detailed analysis, methods for
calculating, and the Cost of Service formula for the local wastewater system can be found in Appendix
C. The local wastewater SDC rates can be found in the current adopted fee schedule in Appendix F.
The local wastewater SDC for a proposed development is determined by:
Number of Residential Dwelling Units (RDU) and area of living space for single-family, duplex,
multiple-family, and other residential development
Plumbing Fixture Units (PFU) and proposed development type for other than Residential
Dwelling Units (e.g., recreation center, convenience market).
4.2 Regional Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) Wastewater System
The City of Eugene entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement with the City of Springfield and Lane
County in 1978, which established the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission. On May
15, 1997, the Commission adopted the MWMC wastewater Systems Development Charge which
included a regional administrative charge. On April 1, 2004, the Commission adopted a modified
MWMC regional wastewater SDC methodology; the MWMC SDC structure was amended to include a
compliance charge and to discontinue the use of a separate administrative charge. The regional
MWMC wastewater SDC methodology is located in Appendix C2. Current regional rates are also
summarized in the Appendix F fee schedule.
5.0 Stormwater System
The stormwater SDC is based upon impervious surface area (e.g., rooftops, driveways, sidewalks,
parking lots, patios, and other non-porous surfaces). The detailed formulas for calculating the
stormwater SDC unit cost (rate) per square foot of impervious surface area is set forth in
Appendix D. The stormwater SDC is determined by multiplying the applicable rate by the unit of
measure for the proposed development type. The costs per unit of measure and resulting rates can be
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
found in Table 9 and the fee schedule in Appendix F.
Where the stormwater SDC is a fixed amount per dwelling unit or space, it shall be determined by
multiplying the applicable rate per dwelling unit or space times the number of units or spaces plus, for
manufactured home park development, the SDC is based upon the impervious surface area of all
additional common areas times the applicable stormwater unit cost per square foot of impervious
surface area. Where the stormwater SDC is not a fixed amount per dwelling unit or space, it shall be
determined by multiplying the applicable rate per square foot of impervious surface area times the total
impervious surface area of the proposed development. Where a development creates impact not
attributable to impervious surface area, the stormwater SDC shall be determined by evaluating
equivalent impervious surface area, multiplied by the applicable rate per square foot of impervious
surface area.
6.0 Parks System
The parks SDC is based upon the estimated cost of capacity in future capacity-enhancing projects to
serve new development, as contained in the Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Project &
Priority Plan, and the estimated capacity in the existing parks system to be used by new development.
The details for calculating the park SDC unit costs (rates) for residential development (per dwelling unit
type) and nonresidential development (per room or per thousand gross square feet) are set forth in
Appendix E. The park SDC is determined by multiplying the applicable rate by the unit of measure for
the proposed development type. The costs per unit of measure and resulting rates may be found in
Table 17.
7.0 Impact Reductions, Credits, and Compact Development Adjustments
This section provides detail on the City's administration of SDC impact reductions, credits, and
compact development adjustments. Potential sources, criteria for eligibility, and the basis for
calculation of impact reductions, credits, and compact development adjustments are defined in this
Methodology (including appendices) and in Eugene Code, 1971 sections 7.730 and 7.732. A list of
examples of facilities and programs which are potentially eligible for these adjustments appears in
Table G-1 of this section. (Note: As development standards change, some examples may no longer
be considered eligible for reduction, but may influence future rates.) In no case may the sum of all
approved credits, impact reductions, and compact development adjustments for a single system
exceed the amount of the SDC assessed for that system for any approved building or development
permit.
The amount owed for SDCs may be reduced by one or more of the following processes described in
this methodology:
Impact Reduction, based on quantified mitigation of demand generated by the development for
new identifiable capital improvements (available for transportation and stormwater system
SDCs);
Credit, based on the specific costs for privately engineered construction of certain public
improvements as part of the development;
Credit, based upon the payment of or contribution to the cost of certain capital improvements in
association with multiple-family residential projects of five dwelling units or more (available for
transportation, wastewater, stormwater, and parks system SDCs);
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Credit based on previous payment or use (available for transportation, wastewater, stormwater,
and parks system SDCs);
Compact Development Adjustments (available for transportation system SDCs)
Adjustment of SDCs due to impact reductions, credits, and compact development adjustments:
Shall not be given for improvements constructed or programs instituted prior to City approval.
Shall be applied up to the maximum SDC fee for the applicable system.
Shall reduce the SDCs paid on building permits at the time of issuance, but in no case may the
sum of impact reductions, credits, and compact development adjustments exceed the SDC.
Shall be applied to a particular system (e.g., Transportation, Stormwater, Wastewater, Parks);
credits or reductions approved for a particular system cannot be transferred or applied to any
other system charges.
Shall be applied to the SDCs for the particular development, may only be further applied to
subsequent phases of the same development for which the improvement was constructed or
program instituted, and cannot be transferred or applied to other properties or developments.
7.1 Impact Reductions or Mitigation
City approval of an impact reduction or mitigation will be based on programs instituted in connection
with development and/or private physical improvements (as defined in Appendix A) constructed as part
of the development. Such programs and improvements shall:
Reduce the demand from that development for future construction of identifiable capital
improvements;
Be privately financed; and
Be designed to be permanent.
The anticipated reduction in demand must be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Calculation of impact reduction shall be based on the ratio of the system impact with the program or
facility in place, to the system impact if the program or facility did not exist.
Prior to application of the impact reduction to the SDCs for the development, the City shall receive
assurances that will bind the developer, owner, and the owner's successors as is necessary to ensure
that the program or facility will function as planned for the agreed upon time period. Such agreements
may include, but are not limited to performance bonds, maintenance programs, annual reports,
monitoring and inspections, or other pertinent items to document proper functioning as determined by
the City Engineer.
7.1.1 Transportation System Impact Reduction
For the transportation system, an impact reduction may be granted if the applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that the improvement or program to be
instituted in connection with the development will materially reduce the number of automobile
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
trips the development will generate and that it will continue for at least twenty years after the
development is occupied.
7.1.2 Stormwater System Impact Reduction or Mitigation
For the stormwater system, an impact reduction may be granted based on two forms of impact
reduction:
Flood Control (Destination and Quantity Reduction)
Stormwater Quality (Pollution Reduction)
These impact reductions will be granted after review and approval by the City Engineer of the
design documentation submitted in accordance with standards specified in Eugene Code, 1971
section 9.6790 (3). Criteria for stormwater SDC impact reduction for development can be found
in Appendix D, section 6.0.
7.1.2.1 Stormwater System Impact Reduction Criteria
Criteria for stormwater SDC impact reduction for development can be found in
Appendix D, section 6.0. A development that meets the required criteria will be
eligible to receive a reduction against stormwater SDCs at the time of permit
issuance as follows:
SFD and duplex residential development:
100% flat rate stormwater SDC impact reduction for complete containment of all
on-site stormwater, with no direct or indirect connection to the public system; or
50% flat rate stormwater SDC impact reduction for any amount of partial
containment of runoff on-site.
Multi-family residential, commercial, industrial, other development using a common
or shared facility:
The stormwater SDC will be reduced in the same proportion that the mitigating
facility reduces runoff leaving the fully developed site.
7.2 Credits
City approval of credits shall be given based on one or more of the following:
7.2.1 Qualified Public Improvement Credit
For any qualified public improvement (as defined in Eugene Code) to be constructed in
connection with the development for which an SDC is collected.
7.2.2 Capital Improvement Credit
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
For any capital improvement (as defined in Eugene Code) to be constructed as part of a
development to the extent:
That it reduces the need for construction of specific, identifiable public improvements;
or
That it would otherwise have to be constructed or acquired at public expense and is
eligible for funding with Systems Development Charge funds under the current
policies of the City Council; or
That the City can recover credits through collection of an equivalent assessment from
benefited properties, or for which the City Council has formed a Local Improvement
District in accordance with provisions in Eugene Code, 1971 section 6.610 (6) or
7.407 (2).
7.2.3 Credit for Multiple-Unit Housing Capital Improvements
Per Eugene Code, 1971 section 7.731, a multiple-unit housing credit may be granted for the
construction of, payment for, or contribution to the cost of certain capital improvements, as part
of a multiple-family residential project consisting of five or more dwelling units, if all the following
conditions are met:
The capital improvement must be included on a capital improvement plan described in
Eugene Code 1971, section 7.715(2) and be eligible for SDC funding under the Plan;
and
The improvement must be located within the boundaries of the neighborhood
association in which the development is being constructed; and
Credit for the construction of or contribution to the improvement is permissible under
state law; and
The City Council, the developer, and the applicable neighborhood association board of
directors each:
o Agree that the improvement will mitigate one or more impacts resulting from the
multiple-family residential project in the neighborhood; and
o Approve the grant of SDC credit in exchange for the construction of, or
contribution to, the improvement.
A multiple-unit housing credit may be applied only toward the SDC attributable to the same
capital system (transportation, wastewater, stormwater, parks) as the improvement constructed,
paid for, or contributed to by the developer. A multiple-unit housing credit may be for no more
than fifty percent of the SDC for the applicable capital system.
7.2.4 Credit for Previous Payment or Use
SDC fees, including administrative charges, that have been paid are not refundable and, in the
case of an agreement to pay SDCs in installments, the terms of the agreement may not be
modified. A partial refund of SDC fees will be made or a modification of an installment
agreement will be allowed when an active development permit is canceled or expires without
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
being used, a change of design of an active development permit is approved that results in a
less intense use of the property, or property previously developed as a manufactured home
park is partitioned and redeveloped. No portion of the administrative charges will be refunded,
and additional review fees may be imposed to cover the cost of calculating and processing the
partial refund.
Credits for other types of previous payment or use may, however, be provided. In calculating
the credits given under this section, the City Engineer shall apply credit for previous payment or
use only to developments (e.g. structure, impervious area) for which the previous use, including
that for which developments have been demolished, or payment can be verified and for which a
credit has not been previously given. The burden of proof is on the applicant to provide
adequate documentation (e.g. tax records, utility billing / water usage records, building permit
records). Credits for previous payment or use are provided in the following manner:
When redevelopment occurs that does not change the use of a building in its entirety,
the credit will be based on the most previous verifiable use; or
When an entire building is demolished or when redevelopment occurs that will change
the use of a building in its entirety, the credit for previous use will be based on the
previous most intense verifiable use per system. In this case, the credit calculation will
be performed independently for each system which may result in different periods of the
use of the site being the basis of comparison.
7.2.5 City Cost of Construction Credit
In calculating the credits given under section 7.2.1 and 7.2.2, the City Engineer shall estimate
the cost of the capital improvement based upon what the City would pay were it to construct
such improvements.
7.2.6 Revenue Collection for Equivalent Assessment or Special Benefit
Credit
When an equivalent assessment or a special benefit assessment is collected when property
connects to a public improvement for which the City has granted a credit under 7.2.2 above, the
revenue collected (net of the costs of collection) shall be deposited in the SDC fund for the
system to which connection was made and for which the credit was given unless the SDC fund
has been reimbursed for the credit from other City funds. If the SDC fund has been reimbursed
in advance from other City funds, the revenue collected will be deposited to the City fund which
reimbursed the SDC fund.
7.3 Compact Development Adjustments
Compact development adjustments may be granted to reduce the amount owed for a transportation
system SDC, as detailed in section 4.4 of the transportation methodology, located in Appendix B to
this General Methodology.
Commencing with the 2019 fiscal year, and continuing each fiscal year thereafter, the City may grant
a base amount totaling $130,000 annually for location-based, transit proximity and transportation
demand management adjustments, combined. Each fiscal year there is a change in the rates for the
SDCs for residential development, the base amount for that fiscal year shall be adjusted in an
amount proportionate to that change.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
If any portion of the authorized base amount remains unallocated at the end of a fiscal year, that
portion shall be added to the authorized base amount for the next fiscal year.
7.4 Revocation of Impact Reduction, Credit, or Compact Development Adjustment
An impact reduction, credit, or compact development adjustment which has been applied to reduce
SDC fees may be revoked and the unpaid portion of the SDC reimposed as a lien against the property,
within the time required by these Methodologies, if:
The associated reduction program for which an impact reduction has been approved is not
instituted or is modified without the approval of the City Engineer, or ceases to function as
designed;
The associated capital improvement for which SDC credit has been given is not constructed or
completed as required, or fails to function as designed; or
The associated development for which a compact development adjustment has been approved
removes required automobile and/or pedestrian connections to transit corridors, or changes
use to a development type that does not meet the compact development adjustment criteria.
Such revocation shall not occur until ten days prior written notice has been given to and an opportunity
to be heard afforded the applicant and property owner. If the credit or impact reduction is revoked, the
City Manager may add to the amount due, the cost of the revocation proceedings.
7.5 Application for Credit and Impact Reduction
An application for a credit or impact reduction, including related documentation and information, shall
be submitted by the applicant in the manner prescribed by the City, together with any fee set by the
City Engineer pursuant to Eugene Code, 1971 section 2.020. The applicant shall have the burden of
demonstrating the eligibility for a credit and/or impact reduction. No credit or impact reduction shall
be granted for an SDC that has already been imposed, collected or agreed to be paid in installments
unless resulting from cancellation of an active permit, expiration of a permit without being used, or an
approved change of design of an active permit.
7.5.1 Application for Impact Reduction
Applicants must submit their request for an impact reduction in writing, accompanied by
documentation that supports the basic function and design criteria for estimated impact
reduction.
For commercial development, impact reduction will be applied uniformly for all lots or building
sites in the development phase approved. Impact reductions granted under this methodology
document may be used in subsequent phases of a development when the applicant
demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City Engineer that the program or improvements
continue to provide the anticipated reduction in demand, and the City has received
assurances or agreements from the developer, owner, and owners successors, as approved
by the City Engineer as is necessary to ensure that the program or facility will continue to
function as planned for the agreed upon time period. Changes to the mitigated program or
facility attributable to the connection of an additional phase which results in any deviation
from the previously determined impact reduction will be adjusted proportionately.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
7.5.2 Application for Credit Based on Construction of Public Improvements
For credits derived from the construction of public improvements, the property owner(s) will
be notified in writing about potential credit availability, subsequent to the approval and
bonding of the construction plans. The property owner(s) will have 60 days from the date of
written notification to submit the SDC Credit Application and complete the approval process.
Applications that include disbursement instructions for ineligible lots or which contain
requests in conflict with City code, state law, or current City policies/practices will be
considered incomplete applications.
7.5.3 Credit Distribution in the Absence of Directions from an Approved SDC Credit
Application
With the exception of cases where the recovery of credit through an equivalent assessment
is uncertain, if the owner does not comply with the requirements of section 7.5.2, the credit
will be distributed by the “equal lot” method. All eligible lots or building sites will be identified,
and the credit will be distributed in an equal amount to each of these eligible lots or building
sites. Credit applied under this policy will not be eligible to be appealed. Development for
which a building permit is issued prior to administration of credit disbursal or approval by the
City Engineer will not be considered eligible for credit distribution.
7.5.4 Changes to an Approved Credit Application
Whether established by the City using the “equal lot” method or by the property
owner(s)/applicant(s), any modifications to the distribution of credits will require a new
completed application, must be approved by the City Engineer, and will be effective only
upon approval by the City Engineer of the revised credit application. The revised distribution
will apply only to the remaining credit balances and undeveloped lots or building sites to
which the credit originally applied.
7.6 Decision on Application for Credit
The City Engineer shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application in writing, setting forth
the reason for the decision. Such a decision shall be mailed or personally delivered to the applicant.
7.7 Credit and Impact Reduction Duration
Credits for qualified public improvements, capital improvements, and multiple-unit housing capital
improvements granted under this methodology document may be applied to SDC fees for a
development up to a maximum of 10 years from the date of the original written notification.
Impact reductions granted under this methodology document may be applied to SDC fees for a
development until such time as the program or improvements no longer continue to provide the
anticipated reduction in demand and the City has determined that assurances or agreements from
the developer, owner, or owners successors, are no longer adequate to ensure that the program or
facility will continue to function as planned for the agreed upon time period.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
8.0 Appeals
An appeal by an applicant or a permittee of any decision of the City Manager under these
Methodologies shall be governed by Eugene Code, 1971 section 7.735 and must be filed and the
appeal fee paid within 15 working days of the date of the decision. Such appeals shall be in writing
and filed with Public Works Engineering Permit Technician staff located at the City’s Permit &
Information Center. A separate appeal must be filed for each decision being appealed. The appeal
fee, as established under Eugene Code, 1971 section 2.020, can be found in the current adopted
SDC Fee schedule in Appendix F.
A person objecting to the City’s final decision under Eugene Code, 1971 section 7.735 concerning
the calculation of a systems development charge may seek judicial review of the decision pursuant
to ORS 34.010 to 34.100.
9.0 Interested Persons Notification
The City shall maintain a list of persons who have made a written request for notification prior to
adoption or modification of a methodology for any SDC. The City shall mail written notification to
persons on the list at least 90 days prior to the first hearing to adopt or modify a system development
charge. The methodology supporting the adoption or modification will be available 60 days prior to
the first hearing to adopt or amend a systems development charge. The failure of a person on the
list to receive a notice that was mailed will not invalidate the action of the City. The City may
periodically delete names from the Interested Persons List or require a new written request for
notification be made if the person wishes to remain on the list. At least thirty (30) days prior to
removal of the name from the Interested Persons List, the City will send notification to the person
whose name is to be deleted. It is the responsibility of the person requesting to maintain a current
address with the City for the purposes of being included on the Interested Persons List. An
amendment to a methodology that changes the amount of a reimbursement fee or an improvement
fee is not a “modification” of the system development charge subject to this notification requirement if
the change is based on the periodic application of the cost index described in 2.4.1, or on a change
in the costs of materials, labor or real property applied to projects or project capacity on a project list
adopted pursuant to ORS 223.309.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
=
Assessable costs & Grants
SDC Eligible Costs
Impact Measurement
SDC
Cost of Service
SDC eligible costs
(equals)
Formula
(minus)
(PER UNIT OF SERVICE)
of development
specific types
Apply SDC to
F I G U R E G-1
Rate-Setting Methodology
(plus)
expenditures
Level of Service
Impact Measurement
System Value
Replacement costs for
existing reserve capacity
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
T A B L E G-1
Potential Impact Reductions, Credits, and Compact Development Adjustments
for System Development Charges
NOTE: These are examples only; eligibility is established at time of review of plans which approve the proposed improvements.
1. Transportation System
IMPACT REDUCTIONS:
Successful bus pass program for employees
CREDITS:
Street width in excess of assessable width
Off-site, non-contiguous arterial or collector intersection
Street light on arterial or collector street
Off-site arterial or collector right-of-way and easement acquisition
Traffic signal on arterial or collector street
Off-street bicycle shared-use paths identified in adopted City plan
Off-site eligible public improvements where equivalent assessments can be collected
COMPACT DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS:
Adjustments based on site’s location in relation to nodal areas, key corridors, frequent transit
network routes, and Downtown Plan and West University Commercial Districts boundaries
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) agreement to reduce parking spaces
Secondary Accessory dwelling units (ASDUs)
2. Wastewater System
CREDITS:
Public Wastewater collection lines > 8-inch diameter
Public pump stations and pressure lines that serve more than the development
Off-site public improvements, where equivalent assessments can be collected
Prior payment of Metropolitan Wastewater Service District debt service
3. Stormwater System
IMPACT REDUCTIONS:
Destination and Quantity: Reduction or elimination by retention of stormwater otherwise
discharged into public system
Pollution: Reduction of pollution via approved treatment techniques
CREDITS:
Stormwater collection lines > 24inch diameter
Major drainage channels: construction and off-site easement
Off-site public improvements where equivalent assessments can be collected or that
benefit existing developments
4. Parks System
CREDITS:
Land dedication (for sites accepted by City, consistent with adopted City plans)
On-site park facility dedication (for improvements accepted by City, consistent with
adopted City plans)
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
City of Eugene
System Development Charge Methodologies
Appendix A
Definitions of General Terms and
Transportation Use Codes
&
Cross-References for Wastewater & Parks SDCs
Based Upon HUD BPR Use Codes Descriptions
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Appendix A
Definitions of General Terms and Use Codes
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): (Also referred to as a Secondary Dwelling Unit). As used
in the determination of SDC rates, an accessory dwelling unit is any interior, attached or
detached residential structure that is used in connection with or that is accessory to a single
family dwelling on the same lot. An ADU typically has the following components:
separate ingress / egress
living area
kitchen facilities including sink (in addition to bathroom sink), refrigerator, or stove
separate bathroom
Acquisition Costs: The indirect or direct amount expended to procure use, possession, rights,
or title as related to the construction of public improvements. This cost may be determined by
current market experience, or other reasonable and prudent methods approved by the City
Engineer.
Administrative Charge: A City charge to recover costs associated with staff time to review a
permit’s SDC impact, the development of the methodologies, the provision of an annual
accounting of system development charge expenditures, and the implementation and operational
costs associated with the SDC program.
Assessable Costs: The amount of capital improvement costs which are collected through the
City’s local improvement assessment program as established in City code. This cost has been
removed from the total cost of capital improvements in determining the system-specific SDC.
Average Cost Determination:
The average cost of inspecting and installing connections with the wastewater facilities and
with the stormwater facilities, which are not part of the SDC as defined in E.C. 7.010, is
the connection permit fee established by the City.
If an applicant to connect to a wastewater or stormwater facility would result in
extraordinary cost of inspecting and installing the connection, nothing in this definition shall
prevent the City from requiring the applicant pay such costs. The extraordinary costs may
be paid by the applicant in installments as part of the SDC.
Average Flow: The typical average daily flow of development, by type of land use. For purposes
of calculating the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission SDC, this flow is
expressed in terms of a unit of development.
BOD: Biochemical Oxygen Demand. The quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidation
of organic matter.
Change of Use of a Building in Its Entirety: An existing building proposed to redevelop in
manner that changes all existing use classifications as determined by staff.
City Engineer: The City Manager, the person designated by the City Manager to serve as the City
Engineer, or the City Engineer’s designee.
City Manager: City Manager or designee.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Construction Costs: The cost in current fiscal year dollars for construction of future capital
improvements.
Cost of Service: The calculation of a “per unit” cost to the City of providing system-specific
capacity (e.g., wastewater collection capacity).
Credit: An amount that may be subtracted from the net SDCs assessed for a development.
Credits may be based upon (a) previous payment or use, or (b) the costs of, or contributions to,
certain capital improvements associated with the development.
Development Types: As used in determining SDC rates, development and uses of development
sites are categorized, per system, depending on the relative impact. Also referred to as use
codes.
EDU: Equivalent Dwelling Unit: EDU is used in the parks SDCs as a basis for determining the
relative impact or service used by different types of development. Represents the use of capacity
that is approximately equal to that of a single dwelling unit.
Equitable Share of Public Facility Costs: As used in the development of SDCs, the City’s cost
of providing system capacity, allocated to new development relative to the development’s impact
or use of system capacity.
FEU: Flow Estimation Unit. For the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission SDC, the
Flow Estimation Unit is the unit of impact upon which the rate per unit is based. The FEU is
typically per 1,000 square feet of building area for most commercial users, and dwelling units for
residential development.
ITE: Institute of Transportation Engineers
Impact Measurement: The unit of system capacity used to determine the relative effect of a new
development on the capacity of a specific system. For example, the number of gallons of
discharge flow per plumbing fixture unit is used to determine the effect of various development
types on the local wastewater system.
Impact Reduction: (a) Private physical improvements constructed as part of a development, or
programs instituted in connection with the development, which will reduce the demand from that
development upon one or more capital systems; (b) the amount by which an SDC fee is lowered
based upon an impact reduction.
Impervious Surface: Impervious surface is used as an impact measure for the stormwater SDC.
An impervious surface is that which prevents or retards saturation of water into the surface of the
soil or causes water to run off the surface in greater quantity or at an increased rate of flow
compared to the natural condition of the property before development. Asphalt, concrete, and
roofing materials are examples of impervious materials.
Improvement Fee: The portion of the system-specific SDC charged for costs associated with
capital improvements to be constructed to increase capacity of the system to accommodate new
development.
Level of Service (LOS): (per unit of development) As used in development of SDC rates, LOS
represents the amount of system (or sub-system) capacity provided at a certain point in time. The
planned level of service is used as the basis for determining the system impacts of new
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
development. This is presented in terms of the appropriate impact measure.
Living Area: As used in the determination of local wastewater SDC rates, living area is defined
as the gross floor area, to the outside perimeter, of a dwelling including floor area within
structures accessory to the dwellings that is intended for habitation, e.g. bonus rooms over
garages, some attic spaces.
Low Impact Development (LID): As used in determination of stormwater SDC rates, LID is the
management of stormwater runoff by approved infiltration and filtration facilities in accordance
with standards specified in EC 9.6792 (3).
Methodology: This document entitled “City of Eugene Systems Development Charge
Methodologies” and any amendment or modification made hereto.
Mixed-Use Development: As relating to Transportation Compact Development Adjustments
(see section 4.4 of Appendix B / Transportation SDC Methodology), a development (either a
single building or a group of buildings) that includes a combination of commercial and certain
residential uses. Residential uses may include the following compact development types, but
shall not include detached single-family dwelling or duplex development:
Multi-family residential development, including apartments and apartment-style
condominiums
Rowhouses and townhouses
MWMC: Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission - responsible for regional
wastewater treatment.
Peak Flow: For purposes of the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission SDC, peak
flow is the peak wet weather design capacity of the regional wastewater treatment plant.
PFU: Plumbing Fixture Units. PFUs are defined in the state Uniform Plumbing Code. A unit
equivalent is assigned to different drainage fixtures depending on drain pipe or fixture size. The
rate of charge per PFU will vary and is dependent upon a development’s land use and associated
impact to the pubic wastewater system.
Private Physical Improvements (for impact reduction/mitigation): A facility or asset,
designed and constructed at the developer’s expense, which is owned and maintained by the
property owner or owner’s agent; not a program or activity or naturally occurring physical
attribute.
Process Wastewater: Water which, during manufacturing or processing, comes into contact with
or results from the production of or use of any raw material, intermediate product, finished
product, byproduct or waste product.
Proportionate Share of Public Facility Costs: The cost of capital improvements which are
reasonably attributable to new development.
Reimbursement Fee: The portion of the system-specific SDC charged for costs associated with
capital improvements already constructed, or under construction when the fee is established, that
have existing capacity to serve future growth.
Replacement Costs: The cost (in current fiscal year dollars) of replacing existing system
capacity.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Residential Dwelling Unit (RDU): Residential Dwelling Units are used in the calculation of
wastewater SDCs as a basis for determining the relative impact or service used by residential
development. A base fee is applied to each RDU, such as one house, one accessory dwelling unit,
or each apartment unit, plus a rate per square foot is applied to the total living area. For
manufactured home parks, which are charged SDCs at the time a park’s initial development permit
is issued, the local wastewater SDC will be based upon the maximum size of manufactured home
that can be placed on building pads located within the park. Each space shall constitute an RDU
and the rate per square foot shall be applied to the total gross floor area of all additional proposed
structures within the park.
SDC Eligible Costs: System value net of assessable costs, grants and outstanding debt. This
cost is allocated to all development in proportion to its impact on system capacity.
SS: Suspended Solids. The total elements and compounds which float on the surface of, or are
suspended in, wastewater and which are removable by laboratory filtration, expressed in
milligrams per liter.
Secondary Dwelling Unit (SDU): See Accessory Dwelling Unit. As used in the determination of
SDC rates, a secondary dwelling unit is any additional residential dwelling unit added to a
development site for which a secondary dwelling unit is allowed per local code. A secondary
dwelling unit is created auxiliary to, and is smaller than, the main dwelling, and typically has the
following components:
separate ingress/egress
living area
kitchen facilities including sink (in addition to bathroom sink), refrigerator, and cooking
facilities
separate bathroom
Note that while inclusion of all of the above would constitute the potential impact of an additional
dwelling unit, exclusion of any item(s) listed above would not preclude such an impact for the
purposes of calculating SDC fees.
Single Family Dwelling (SFD): As used in EC 7.725(b) and this methodology, a "single family
dwelling" means a "Dwelling, single family detached" as defined in EC 9.015.
TGSF: Thousand Gross Square Feet. Sum (expressed in the thousands, in decimal form) of the
area of each floor level, including, but not limited to, basements, mezzanines, penthouses,
corridors, mechanical rooms, and storage areas that are within the principal outside faces of the
exterior walls. The City’s TGSF definition is based upon the definition of “gross floor area” in the
Institute of Traffic Engineer’s Trip Generation Manual. TGSF measurements:
Include exterior walls
Include all areas that have clear standing headroom (6 feet, 6 inches minimum), regardless
of their use
Shall count the area of stairs once for each two floors the stairs connect
Shall count the shaft of an elevator once, regardless of the number of stories it connects
Do not include parking and drive aisle areas within parking garages
TGSFLA: Thousand Gross Square Foot Leasable Area
Transportation Demand Management (TDM): A transportation planning proposal for a given
development that reduces the demand that development places upon the transportation system
by redistributing or eliminating vehicle trips and encouraging the use of alternate modes of travel.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Unit of Development (Unit): Unit of measure for determining the size of a development for use
in calculating the effect of the development on a system.
Example: Number of Units of Development x Impact Measure per Unit = Impact of
Development
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Definitions of Transportation Use Codes
030 Truck Terminal
Truck terminals are facilities where goods are transferred between trucks, trucks and railroads, or
trucks and ports.
090 Park & Ride Lot with Bus Service
Park-and-ride lots with bus service are areas used for the transfer of people between private
vehicles and buses. They usually contain a bus passenger shelter, a parking lot, and circulation
facilities for buses, as well as for private motor vehicles. In addition to park-and-ride, there are a
significant number of passengers who are dropped off.
110 General Light Industrial
Industrial facilities have an emphasis on activities other than manufacturing, and may include
activities such as printing, material-testing laboratories, and assembling of data processing
equipment. Typically these facilities are freestanding and devoted to a single use/activity.
130 Industrial Park
Development within an industrial park is characterized by a mix of manufacturing, service, and
warehouse facilities with a wide variation in the proportion of each type of use from one location
to another. Industrial park tenants may be highly diversified; some parks may contain a large
number of different types of small businesses, while others may have one or two dominant
industries.
140 Manufacturing
Manufacturing facilities are areas where the primary activity is the conversion of raw material or
parts into finished products. The size and type of activity may vary substantially from one facility
to another. In addition to the actual production of goods, manufacturing facilities generally also
have office, warehouse, research, and associated functions. This use code also includes general
heavy industrial uses which are facilities typically limited to the manufacturing of large items.
[Combines ITE use codes 120 General Heavy Industrial and 140 Manufacturing.]
150 Warehousing
Warehouses are primarily devoted to the storage of materials; they may also include office and
maintenance areas.
151 Mini-Warehouse
Mini-warehouses are buildings in which a number of storage units or vaults are rented for the
storage of goods. Each unit is physically separated from other units, and access is usually
provided through an overhead door or other common access point. These are often referred to as
“self-storage facilities.”
160 Data Center
Data centers are free-standing, warehouse-type facilities that are primarily used for off-site storage
of computer systems and associated components, including applications and secure data. Data
centers may be occupied by single or multiple tenants and may include maintenance areas and a
small office. Data centers typically have a small number of employees and visitors.
170 Utilities
Utilities are free-standing buildings containing electromechanical or industrial space equipment.
These facilities may include storage areas and office space.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
210 Single-Family Dwelling / Duplex
This use code includes single-family detached housing, mobile homes, and /duplex homes on
individual lots.
[Combines ITE use codes 210 Single-Family Dwelling and 240 Mobile Home Park.]
211 Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) / Secondary Dwelling Unit (SDU)
Any interior, attached or detached residential structure that is used in connection with or that is
accessory to a single family dwelling on the same lot. An ADU typically has the following
components:
separate ingress / egress
living area
kitchen facilities including sink (in addition to bathroom sink), refrigerator, or stove
separate bathroom
220 Apartments
Apartments are rental dwelling units located on the same property with at least two other dwelling
units.
230 Condominium/Townhome
Condominiums/townhomes are ownership dwelling units constructed in a group of three or more
attached units.
251 Senior Housing Development
Senior adult housing consists of detached independent living developments, such as retirement
communities, age-restricted housing and active adult communities. In addition to residential units,
these developments may include golf courses, pools, security, transportation and common
recreational/social facilities.
[Combines ITE use codes 251 Senior Adult Housing – Detached and 252 Senior Adult Housing -
Attached.]
253 Congregate Care Facility / Continuing Care Retirement Community
Congregate care facilities are independent living developments that provide centralized amenities
such as dining, housekeeping, transportation, and organized social/recreational activities. Limited
medical services may or may not be provided.
254 Assisted Living / Nursing Home
Assisted living developments and nursing homes are residential facilities that provide protective
oversight and/or daily care to mentally or physically limited persons. Assisted living facilities
provide routine general assistance with activities necessary for independent living. They commonly
have separate living quarters for residents and services related to dining, housekeeping, social
and physical activities, medication administration, and transportation. Nursing homes are facilities
whose primary function is to provide care for persons who are unable to care for themselves.
Skilled nurses and nursing aides are available 24 hours a day. Both assisted living and nursing
homes are occupied by residents who do very little or no driving; traffic is primarily generated by
employees, visitors, and delivery trucks.
[Combines ITE use codes 254 Assisted Living and 620 Nursing Home.]
310 Hotel/Motel
Hotels are places of lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities, such
as, restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited
recreational facilities (pool/fitness room), and other retail and service shops. Motels are places of
lodging that provide sleeping accommodations and often a restaurant. Motels generally have little
or no meeting space.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
[Combines ITE use codes 310 Hotel and 320 Motel.]
411 City Park
City parks are publicly owned and operated and may vary widely as to location, type, and number
of facilities. Seasonal use of the individual sites differs widely as a result of the varying facilities
and local conditions.
430 Golf Course
Golf courses can be publicly or privately maintained and operated. This category also includes
private country clubs. Some sites have driving ranges and clubhouses with a pro shop and/or
restaurant, lounge, and banquet facilities.
437 Bowling Alley
Bowling alleys are recreational facilities that include bowling lanes. A small lounge, restaurant
and/or snack bar, video games, and pool tables may also be available.
444 Movie Theater
Movie theaters consist of audience seating, single or multiple screens and auditoriums, a lobby,
and a refreshment stand. Matinees may or may not be provided.
[Combines ITE use codes 443 Movie Theater without Matinee, 444 Movie Theater with Matinee,
and 445 Multiplex Movie Theater.]
491 Racquet/Tennis/Handball Facility
Racquet, tennis, squash, and handball sports facilities may be either publicly or privately owned
and include indoor and/or outdoor facilities. These facilities may include other ancillary uses such
as swimming pools, saunas, weight rooms, snack bars and retail.
[Combines ITE use codes 490 Tennis Courts and 491 Racquet/Tennis Club.]
492 Health/Fitness/Athletic Club
Health, fitness, and athletic clubs are privately owned facilities that may include swimming pools,
whirlpools, saunas, tennis, racquet ball, and handball courts, exercise classes, weightlifting and
gymnastics equipment, locker rooms, and a restaurant or snack bar. Athletic clubs may offer
additional team sports activities and social facilities.
[Combines ITE use codes 492 Health/Fitness Club and 493 Athletic Club.]
495 Recreational Community Center / Multi-Purpose Recreational Facility
Recreational community centers are facilities similar to and including YMCAs, often including
classes and clubs for adults and children; a day care or a nursery school; meeting rooms;
swimming pools and whirlpools; saunas; tennis, racquetball, and handball courts; exercise
classes; weightlifting and gymnastics equipment; locker rooms; and a restaurant or snack bar.
Multi- purpose recreational facilities contain two or more of the following uses: miniature golf,
video arcade, bumper boats, go-carts, and golf driving ranges.
[Combines ITE use codes 435 Multi-Purpose Recreational Facility and 495 Recreational
Community Center.]
520 Elementary School
Elementary schools typically serve students attending kindergarten through the fifth or sixth
grade. This use category consists of public schools where bus service is usually provided to
students living beyond a specified distance from the school.
522 Middle School / Junior High School
Middle schools or junior high schools serve students who have completed elementary school and
have not yet entered high school.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
530 High School
High schools serve students who have completed middle school or junior high school. Land use
category includes both public and private high schools.
536 Private School (K-12)
Private schools in this category serve students attending kindergarten through the twelfth grade.
Students may travel a long distance to get to private schools.
540 Junior/Community College
This use category includes two-year junior colleges, technical schools, or community colleges.
Some include sizable evening programs.
550 University/College
This use category includes undergraduate universities or colleges that may offer graduate
programs.
560 Worship Facilities
This type of facility is a building in which public worship services of any religious or spiritual
practice are held. It may also house an assembly hall or sanctuary; meeting rooms; classrooms;
and, occasionally, dining, catering, or party facilities.
[Combines ITE use codes 560 Church, 561 Synagogue, and 562 Mosque.]
565A Child Day Care Center
A child day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age children is provided, normally
during the daytime hours. Day care facilities generally include classrooms, offices, eating areas,
and playgrounds. Some centers also provide after-school care for children.
565B Adult Day Care Center
An adult day care center is a facility where care for older teens and adults is provided, normally
during the daytime hours. Adult day care facilities generally include classrooms and social
activity rooms, offices, and eating areas.
566 Cemetery
A cemetery is a place for burying the deceased, possibly including buildings used for funeral
services, a mausoleum, and/or a crematorium.
590 Library
A library can be either a public or private facility that consists of shelved books, reading rooms or
areas, and sometimes meeting rooms.
591 Lodge / Fraternal Organization
A lodge or fraternal organization typically includes a clubhouse with dining and drinking facilities,
recreational and entertainment areas, and meeting rooms.
610 Hospital
A hospital is any institution where medical or surgical care and overnight accommodations are
provided to non-ambulatory and ambulatory patients. The term “hospital” does not, however,
refer to stand-alone medical clinics (facilities that provide diagnoses and outpatient care only) or
to nursing homes (facilities devoted to the care of persons unable to care for themselves).
Hospital campuses may include outpatient services, medical office buildings/uses, diagnostic
imaging, and/or pharmacies.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
640 Animal Hospital / Veterinary Clinic
An animal hospital or veterinary clinic is a facility that specializes in the medical care and treatment
of animals.
710 General Office Building
This use category provides for flexible tenant space and lends itself to a variety of business,
commercial, and/or service activities uses, including subdivision or planned unit developments,
containing general office buildings and support services. Uses may include offices, retail and
wholesale stores, restaurants, recreational area, warehousing, manufacturing, industrial, scientific
research functions, financial institutions, service stations.
[Combines ITE use codes 710 General Office Building, 714 Corporate Headquarters Building, 715
Single Tenant Office Building, 730 Government Office Building, 733 Government Office Complex,
and 750 Office Park.]
720 Medical-Dental Office
A medical-dental office building is a facility that provides diagnoses and outpatient care on a
routine basis but is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical and surgical care. This type of
facility is generally operated by one or more private physicians or dentists. Medical office/clinic
uses contained within a hospital campus are assessed under 610 Hospital use code.
[Combines ITE use codes 720 Medical-Dental Office and 630 Clinic].
731 Department of Motor Vehicles
A state motor vehicles department is an office-type building where driver license testing, vehicle
registration, and other related functions are administered.
760 Research and Development Center
Research and development centers are facilities or groups of facilities devoted almost exclusively
to the investigative activities to improve existing products and procedures or to lead to the
development of new products and procedures. Research and development centers may contain
offices and light fabrication areas.
770 Business Park
Business parks consist of a group of flex-type or incubator one- or two-storey buildings served by
a common roadway system. The tenant space is flexible and lends itself to a variety of uses.
Tenant spaces may be served by a garage door. Spaces may include offices, retail and wholesale
stores, restaurants, warehousing, manufacturing, light industrial, scientific research functions,
and/or recreational facilities.
811 Construction Equipment Rental Store
A construction equipment rental store is a business that specializes in the rental of construction-
related equipment tools and supplies including, but not limited to, electrical and industrial tools,
lawn and garden equipment, earthmoving equipment, and safety equipment.
812 Building Materials and Lumber Store
A building materials and lumber store is a small freestanding building that sells hardware,
building materials, and lumber. The lumber may be stored in the main building or in a yard
storage shed. The storage areas are not included in the total gross floor areas.
813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore
Free-standing discount stores and superstores offer a variety of customer services, centralized
cashiering, and a wide range of products; some also include grocery. They often maintain long
store hours, seven days a week.
[Combines ITE use codes 813 Free-Standing Discount Superstore and 815 Free-Standing
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Discount Store.]
814 Variety/Dollar Store
A variety/dollar store is a retail store that sells a broad range of inexpensive items, often at a single
price. Items sold typically include kitchen, cleaning, office, and household supplies.
816 Hardware/Paint Store
These stores typically sell home improvement supplies such as home-building materials, small
tools, keys, locks, plumbing supplies, electrical supplies, cleaning products, housewares, paint,
and lawn and garden products directly to consumers for use at home or for business.
817 Nursery (Garden Center)
A nursery or garden center is a freestanding building with an outside storage area for planting or
landscape stock. Some have large greenhouses and offer landscaping services. Most have office
storage, and shipping facilities. Outdoor storage areas are not included in the size for purposes of
assessing the SDC.
[Combines ITE use codes 817 Nursery (Garden Center) and 818 Nursery (Wholesale).]
820 Shopping Center
A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial/retail stores that are planned, developed,
owned and managed as a unit. In addition to a variety of store types, a shopping center may
contain non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post
offices, banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (e.g. ice skating rinks, indoor miniature
golf). A shopping center also provides on-site parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking
demands. In addition to the integrated unit of stores and commercial areas, a shopping center
may include out-parcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the perimeter of the center
adjacent to the streets and major access points).
823 Factory Outlet Center
A factory outlet center is a shopping center that primarily houses stores that sell factory-made
goods directly to consumers for less than current retail prices.
826 Specialty Retail Center and Other
Specialty retail centers are generally small strip shopping centers that contain a variety of retail
shops and specialize in quality apparel, hard goods, and services such as real estate offices,
dance studios, florists, and small restaurants. This use category also includes miscellaneous
retail and services that may not fit into other available use categories, as determined by staff. A
specialty retail center is typically oriented along and parallel to the adjacent street.
841 Automobile Sales
In addition to automobile sales, these dealerships often include areas for servicing, parts sales,
offices, and used car sales.
[Combines ITE use codes 841 Automobile Sales and 842 Recreational Vehicle Sales.]
843 Automobile Parts Sales
These facilities specialize in the sale of automobile parts for do-it-yourself maintenance and
repair. Items sold include items such as spark plugs, distributor caps, and batteries. These
facilities are not equipped for on-site vehicle repair or automobile sales/service.
848 Tire Store
These stores primarily specialize in the sale, installation and repair of tires. Some stores also
include other automotive maintenance or repair services and customer assistance. These stores
generally do not contain large storage or warehouse areas.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
850 Supermarket
Supermarkets are typically freestanding retail stores selling a complete assortment of food
(sometimes in bulk), food preparation and wrapping materials, and household cleaning and
servicing items. They may also contain facilities such as money machines, photo center,
pharmacies, and video rental areas. [Combines ITE use codes 850 supermarket and 854
discount supermarket.]
851 Convenience Market (Open 24 Hours)
The convenience markets in this classification are open 24 hours per day. These markets
typically sell convenience foods, newspapers, magazines, and often, beer and wine; and they do
not have gasoline pumps.
852 Convenience Market (Open ~15 - 16 Hours)
The convenience markets in this classification are open 15 to 16 hours per day. These markets
sell convenience foods, newspapers, magazines, and often, beer and wine; and they do not have
gasoline pumps.
854 Discount Supermarket
Discount supermarkets are free-standing retail stores selling a complete assortment of food (often
in bulk) and food preparation materials, and household cleaning and servicing items at discount
prices.
857 Discount Club
A discount club is discount store or warehouse where shoppers pay a membership fee in order to
take advantage of discounted prices on a wide variety of items such as food, clothing, tires, and
appliances. Many items may be sold in large quantities or bulk. Some sites may include on-site
fueling pumps.
862 Home Improvement Superstore
Home improvement superstores are freestanding warehouse-type facilities that typically provide
a variety of construction, tools, supplies, and landscaping materials associated with home
construction, remodeling and upgrades. Some of the sites also include garden centers/nursery
facilities. The outside storage areas/garden areas are not included in the determination of the
SDCs. They typically maintain long store hours seven days a week.
863 Electronics Superstore
Electronic superstores are large, freestanding facilities that specialize in the sale of home and
vehicle electronic merchandise. They typically maintain store hours seven days a week. Major
home appliances may also be sold at these facilities.
864 Toy/Children’s Superstore
These stores are large, freestanding warehouse type facilities offering a variety of baby and child-
oriented supplies, toys, clothing, and home-related goods.
875 Department Store
Department stores are free-standing facilities offering a variety of products, including apparel,
footwear, home products, bedding and linens, luggage, jewelry, and accessories. These stores
typically maintain long hours of operation, seven days a week.
876 Apparel Store
An apparel store is an individual store specializing in the sale of clothing.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
879 Arts and Crafts Store
Arts and crafts stores are free-standing facilities that sell art, framing, décor, and seasonal
merchandise. These stores may also provide in-store arts and crafts classes.
880 Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive-Through Window
Pharmacies/drugstores are retail facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription
drugs. These facilities may also sell cosmetics, toiletries, medications, stationary, personal care
products, limited food products, and general merchandise. These drugstores do not have drive-
up windows.
881 Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Through Window
Pharmacies/drugstores are retail facilities that primarily sell prescription and non-prescription
drugs. These facilities may also sell cosmetics, toiletries, medications, stationary, personal care
products, limited food products, and general merchandise. These drugstores have drive-up
windows.
890 Furniture Store
These stores often include large show-rooms, featuring home furnishings, carpeting, and both
pre-assembled as ordered furniture. Both customer pick-up and delivery options are often
provided. These stores often also have large storage areas, which are included in the calculation
of size for assessing the SDC.
911 Walk-In Bank
Walk-in banks are generally free-standing buildings without drive-in windows for customer
service. They often provide walk-up ATMs.
912 Drive-In Bank
Drive-in banks provide facilities for motorists to conduct financial transactions (often including
ATM access) while in a vehicle. Many also provide services for walk-in patrons within the
building.
918 Hair Salon
Hair salons are facilities that specialize in cosmetic and beauty services, including hair cutting and
styling, skin and nail care, and massage therapy. Hair salons may also contain spa facilities.
931 Quality Restaurant
Quality restaurants are full-service eating establishments with a typical duration of stay of at least
one hour. Quality restaurants generally do not serve breakfast; some do serve lunch; all serve
dinner. This type of restaurant is generally not part of a chain, reservations are often required, and
patrons are served by a waiter/waitress. Some also contain bar/lounge facilities that support the
restaurant.
932 Higher Turnover Restaurant, Including Tavern/Bar
A higher turnover restaurant consists of sit-down eating establishments that generally serve lunch
and dinner, may also be open for breakfast, and are sometimes open 24-hours per day. These
restaurants typically do not offer reservations; rather patrons wait to be seated. Turnover rates
are usually one hour or less. Some facilities contained within this land use may also operate as a
tavern, brewpub, or bar and serve alcoholic drinks.
[Combines ITE use codes 925 Drinking Place and 932 High-Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant.]
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
934 Fast Food Restaurant with or without Drive-Through
This use code includes both restaurants with drive-through windows and those without. These
restaurants are characterized by long hours of service (some are open for breakfast, all are open
for lunch and dinner, some are open late or 24 hours) and high turnover rates for eat-in
customers.
[Combines ITE use codes 933 Fast-Food Restaurant without Drive-Through Window and 934
Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through Window.]
937 Coffee/Donut Shop and Coffee/Donut Drive-Through Establishment
This use code includes single-tenant facilities serving coffee, beverages, pastries, sandwiches,
and a variety of food/snack items and other small, miscellaneous products. This category includes
shops with and shops without drive-through windows, as well as those with and those without
indoor seating.
[Combine ITE use codes 936 Coffee/Donut Shop without Drive-Through Window, 937
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window, and 938 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through
Window and No Indoor Seating.]
941 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Stop
These facilities primarily perform oil change services for vehicles. Other ancillary services
provided may include preventative maintenance, such as fluid and filter changes. Automobile
repair service is generally not provided.
942 Auto Care Center
An automobile care center houses numerous facilities (that may or may not be under common
ownership) that provide a variety of automobile-related services, such as repair and servicing,
stereo installation, and seat cover upholstering.
944 Gasoline/Service Station
The primary activity for these stations is for the fueling of motor vehicles; some facilities may
have ancillary servicing and/or repair services. This use includes service stations without
convenience stores. For purposes of assessing the SDC, the vehicle fueling position is defined
as the maximum number of vehicles that can be fueled simultaneously.
945 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market with or without Car Wash
The primary activity for these stations is for the fueling of motor vehicles and provision of small
food items, beverages and other ancillary convenience-oriented goods. Some facilities may have
ancillary servicing and/or repair services. These facilities may include car washes. For purposes
of assessing the SDC, the vehicle fueling position is defined as the maximum number of vehicles
that can be fueled simultaneously.
[Combines ITE use codes 945 Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and 946
Gasoline/Service Station with Convenience Market and Car Wash]
947 Self-Service Car Wash
Self-service car washes are stand-alone facilities, not co-located with gasoline/service stations,
that allow for the manual cleaning of vehicles by providing stalls for the driver to park and wash
the vehicle.
948 Automated Car Wash
Automated car washes are stand-alone facilities, not co-located with gasoline/service stations,
that allow for the mechanical cleaning of the exterior of vehicles. Manual cleaning and detailing
services may also be available.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
950 Truck Stop
Truck stops are facilities that provide refueling, food, and other services to motorists and truck
drivers. These facilities typically contain convenience stores, showers, restaurants, and on-site
truck parking spaces.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Table A-1
Cross-References for Wastewater & Parks SDCs
Based Upon HUD BPR* Use Code Descriptions
* Bureau of Public Records, Housing and Urban Development
Eugene Wastewater SDC
Use Code
Eugene
Park SDC
Use Code
HUD BPR
Land Use
Codes
Land Use Description
1F SFD 1111 Single Family Housing
1F SFD 1119 Common or Open Area - Typically In Single Family Area
1F Duplex 1120 Two Family Housing Unit-Duplex
1F Duplex 1129 Common or Open Area - Typically In Duplex Structure Area
11 Multifamily 1130 Apartment Under Construction
11 Multifamily 1131 Quad
11 Multifamily 1132 Apartment With 1 To 4 Units
11 Multifamily 1133 Apartment With 5 To 19 Units
11 Multifamily 1134 Apartment With 20 Units or More
11 Multifamily 1139 Common or Open Area - Typically In Multi-Unit Structure Area
1F MH 1150 Mobile Home - Not In Mobile Home Park
1F MH 1151 Mobile Home - Temporary
1F MH 1159 Common or Open Area - Typically In Mobile Home Area
1F MH 1160 Houseboat-Separate
12C per Person 1210 Boarding & Rooming Houses
12C per Person 1221 Fraternity & Sorority Houses
12C per Person 1231 Nurses Home
12C per Person 1232 College Dormitory
12C per Person 1239 Other Residence Halls or Dormitories
12A, B, or C per Person 1241 Retirement Home
12C per Person 1251 Convents
12C per Person 1252 Monasteries
12C per Person 1253 Rectories
12C per Person 1259 Religious Quarters
12C per Person 1290 Group Quarters (Military, Forest Service)
13 per Rm/Multi 1300 Residential Hotel or Motel With 75% or More Permanently Occupied
14 MH 1400 Mobile Home Park or Court
15 A 1510 Hotels, Motels, Lodges, Cabins, Resorts
15 MH 1520 Mobile Home, Temporary Weekly Lodging
15 per Person 1590 Other Transient Lodgings (YMCA or YWCA)
15 MH 1900 Moorages, Houseboat, Commercial
15 SFD 1910 Seasonally Occupied Family Quarters
21 C 2111 Meat Packing Establishments or Slaughtering Plants
21 C 2113 Poultry & Small Game Dressing & Packing
21 C 2120 Creamery Multi-Dairy Products
21 C 2121 Butter, Creamery & Whey / Mfg
21 C 2122 Cheese Natural & Processed
21 C 2123 Condensed & Evaporated Milk / Mfg
21 C 2124 Ice Cream & Frozen Desserts / Mfg
21 C 2125 Milk Processing & Distribution
21 C 2131 Canning & Preserving Of Sea foods / Mfg
21 C 2132 Canning Specialty Foods
21 C 2133 Canning Fruits, Vegetables, Preserves / Mfg
21 C 2134 Drying & Dehydrating Fruits & Vegetables / Mfg
21 C 2135 Pickling Of Fruits & Vegetables
21 C 2137 Frozen Food Processing (Fruits, Vegetables, Specialties) / Mfg
21 C 2140 Grain Mill Products (Prepared, Concentrated, Supplemented Feeds)
21 C 2150 Bakery Products / Mfg
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
21 C 2171 Candy & Other Confectionery Products / Mfg
21 C 2185 Beverages, Nonalcoholic, Bottled or Canned / Mfg
21 C 2195 Roasting Coffee & Coffee Products / Mfg
21 C 2190 Other Food Preparations & Kindred Products / Mfg
2X C 2220 Knit Goods / Mfg
2X C 2330 Women's, Misses, Girl's, Children's, Infant's Outerwear / Mfg
2X C 2361 Leather Tanning & Finishing / Mfg
2X C 2369 Other Leather Products / Mfg
2X C 2392 House Furnishings (Except Curtains & Draperies) / Mfg
2X C 2393 Textile Bags / Mfg
2X C 2394 Canvas Products / Mfg
2X C 2395 Pleating, Tucking, Decorative & Novelty Stitching For Trade
24 C 2400 Lumber & Paper Co.-Multi-Products
66 C 2410 Logging Camps & Logging Contractors
24 C 2421 Sawmills & Planning Mills, General / Mfg
24 C 2422 Hardwood Dimension & Flooring / Mfg
24 C 2429 Special Sawmill Products (Shingles, Hoops, Staves) / Mfg
24 C 2431 Millwork / Mfg
24 C 2432 Veneer & Plywood / Mfg
24 C 2433 Prefabricated Wooden Buildings & Structural Members / Mfg
24 C 2440 Wooden Containers / Mfg
24 C 2491 Wood Preserving
24 C 2499 Other Lumber & Wood Products (Except Furniture) / Mfg
2X C 2510 Household Furniture / Mfg
2X C 2520 Office Furniture / Mfg
2X C 2540 Partitions, Shelving, Lockers & Store Fixtures / Mfg
2X C 2599 Other Furniture & Fixtures (Cabinets, Carts, Stools) / Mfg
2X C 2620 Paper / Mfg
2X C 2642 Envelopes, Printed or Unprinted, Paper, Glassine, Cello / Mfg
2X C 2646 Pressed & Molded Pulp Goods / Mfg
2X C 2647 Sanitary Paper Products/ Mfg
2X C 2649 Other Converted Paper & Paper Products (Except Containers)/Mfg
2X C 2650 Paperboard Containers & Boxes / Mfg
2X C 2660 Building Paper & Building Board (Fiber, Siding, Felt) / Mfg
2X C 2710 Newspapers, Publishing & Printing or Publishing Only / Mfg
2X C 2720 Periodicals, Publishing & Printing or Publishing Only / Mfg
2X C 2730 Books, Publishing & Printing, or Publishing Only / Mfg
2X C 2740 Commercial Printing / Mfg
2X C 2750 Business Forms, Manifold / Mfg
2X C 2760 Cards, Greeting, Except Hand Painted / Mfg
2X C 2781 Typesetting For The Printing Trade
2X C 2789 Other Printing Trade Service Industries (Decals)
2X C 2790 Other Printing & Publishing (Maps, Directories) / Mfg
3X C 2810 Industrial Inorganic & Organic Chemicals / Mfg
3X C 2820 Plastics, Synthetic Resins, Rubbers & Other Manmade Fibers / Mfg
3X C 2860 Gum & Wood Chemicals / Mfg
3X C 2850 Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels & Allied Products / Mfg
3X C 2870 Agricultural Chemicals (Fertilizers, Herbicides) / Mfg
3X C 2899 Other Chemicals & Allied Products / Mfg
3X C 3140 Miscellaneous Plastic Products / Mfg
3X C 3190 Other Fabricated Rubber Products / Mfg
3X C 3200 Stone, Clay & Glass Products / Mfg
3X C 3229 Other Glass & Glassware Products (Pressed or Blown) / Mfg
3X C 3230 Cement, Hydraulic, Portland, Natural, Masonry, Puzzolan / Mfg
3X C 3249 Structural Clay Products / Mfg
3X C 3259 Pottery & Related Products / Mfg
3X C 3261 Blocks, Concrete & Cinder / Mfg
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
3X C 3262 Concrete Products (Excluding Brick & Block) / Mfg
3X C 3263 Concrete (Ready Mixed) / Mfg
3X C 3270 Cut Stone Products For Building, Ornamental, Paving, / Mfg
3X C 3280 Abrasive, Asbestos & Misc. Nonmetallic Mineral Products / Mfg
3X C 3311 Blast Furnace, Steel Works & Rolling / Mfg
3X C 3320 Iron & Steel Foundries / Mfg
3X C 3360 Nonferrous Foundries (Aluminum, Bronze, Copper, Brass) / Mfg
3X C 3390 Other Primary Metal Industries / Mfg
3X C 3421 Engines & Turbines / Mfg
3X C 3423 Construction, Mining & Materials Handling Machinery & Equipment / Mfg
3X C 3424 Metalworking Machinery & Equipment / Mfg
3X C 3425 Special Industry Machinery (Sawmill Machinery) / Mfg
3X C 3426 General Industrial Machinery & Equipment / Mfg
3X C 3429 Other Machinery Manufacturing (Pistons, Valves)
3X C 3433 Household Electrical Appliances / Mfg
3X C 3435 Radio & Television Receiving Sets / Mfg
3X C 3437 Electronic Components & Accessories / Mfg
3X C 3439 Other Electrical Machinery, Equip. & Supplies Manufacturing
3X C 3441 Motor Vehicles & Equipment / Mfg
3X C 3443 Ship & Boat Building
3X C 3449 Other Transportation Equip. (Campers, Trailers) / Mfg
3X C 3491 Metal Cans / Mfg
3X C 3492 Cutlery, H& Tools & Hardware / Mfg
3X C 3493 Heating Apparatus & Plumbing Fixtures / Mfg
3X C 3494 Fabricated Structural Metal Products (Awnings, Boilers) / Mfg
3X C 3496 Metal Stamping / Mfg
3X C 3497 Coating, Engraving & Allied Services
3X C 3498 Fabricated Wire Products (Misc.) / Mfg
3X C 3499 Other Fabricated Metal Products (Irrigation Equipment, Industrial Patterns).
3X C 3521 Mechanical Measuring & Controlling Instruments / Mfg
3X C 3542 Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies / Mfg
3X C 3913 Lapidary Work, Contract & Other Stone Polishing
3X C 3930 Toys, Amusement, Sporting & Athletic Goods / Mfg
3X C 3950 Costume Jewelry, Novelties, Buttons & Misc. Notions / Mfg
3X C 3997 Signs & Advertising Displays / Mfg
3X C 3999 Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing
4111 Railroad Right-of-Way
4112 Railroad Switching & Marshaling Yard
4X C 4113 Railroad Terminals, Passenger
4X C 4114 Railroad Terminals, Freight
4X C 4115 Railroad Terminals, Passenger & Freight
4X C 4116 Railroad Equipment & Maintenance
4X C 4119 Other Railroad Transportation
4X C 4211 Terminal, Bus Passenger, Intercity
4X C 4214 Maintenance Facilities For Passenger Bus Vehicles
4X 4219 Bus Stops
4X C 4221 Freight Trucking Terminals, With or Without Maintenance Facility
4X C 4222 Motor Freight Garaging & Maintenance Facility
4X E 4223 Moving & Storage, Household
4X C 4229 Other Motor Freight Transportation
4X C 4291 Taxicab Transportation
4X C 4311 Airport & Flying Field Landing/Takeoff Fields
4X C 4312 Airport & Flying Field Terminals (Passenger)
4X C 4313 Airport & Flying Field Terminals (Freight)
4X C 4314 Airport & Flying Field Terminals (Passenger & Freight)
4X C 4315 Aircraft Storage & Equipment Maintenance
4X C 4319 Other Airports & Flying Fields Necessary
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4X C 4391 Heliport Landing/Takeoff Pads
4X C 4399 Other Aircraft Transportation
4500 Highway & Street Rights-of-Way
4508 Bridges - Railroad, Vehicular or Pedestrian
4510 Freeways, (i.e., Routes With No At-Grade Intersections)
4520 Expressways, (i.e. Routes With Grade Intersect Only At Major Streets)
4550 Collector/Distributor Streets
4570 Alleys, Public
4571 Bicycle Path
4575 Pedestrian Walkway, Stairway, Etc.
4580 Rights-Of-Way, Roads-Proposed Roadway
4590 Private Roads
4599 Other Rights-of-Way Related
4X 4600 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Retail)
4X 4601 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Service)
4X 4602 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Government)
4X 4603 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Education)
4X 4604 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Transportation)
4X 4605 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Recreation)
4X 4606 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Industrial)
4X 4607 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Utility)
4X 4608 Automobile Parking (Non-Structure/Religious)
4X 4610 Automobile Parking (Structure/Retail)
4X 4611 Automobile Parking (Structure/Service)
4X 4612 Automobile Parking (Structure/Government)
4X 4613 Automobile Parking (Structure/Education)
4X 4614 Automobile Parking (Structure/Transportation)
4X 4615 Automobile Parking (Structure/Recreation)
4X 4616 Automobile Parking (Structure/Industrial)
4X C 4711 Telephone Exchange Stations
4X C 4719 Telephone Equipment Repair & Servicing
4X D 4721 Radio Telegraph Message Center
4X D 4731 Radio Broadcasting Studios, Commercial & Public Educational
4X D 4732 Radio Broadcasting Transmitters & Towers, Commercial & Public Education
4X D 4739 Other Radio Communication
4X D 4741 Television Broadcasting Studio, Commercial & Public Educational
4X D 4742 Television Transmitters & Towers, Commercial & Public Educational
4X D 4749 Other Television Communication
4X D 4759 Radio & Television Transmitter, Combined, Commercial or Public Education
4X C 4810 Electric & Power Companies
4811 Electric Transmission Right-of-Way
4X C 4812 Electric Generation Plant
4X C 4813 Electricity Regulating Substations
4X C 4819 Other Electric Utility
4X C 4823 Gas Storage Tanks & Distribution Facilities, Mfg or Natural
4X C 4824 Gas Pressure Control Stations
4831 Water Pipeline Right-of-Way (EWEB Canal)
4X C 4832 Water, Domestic Supply, Treatment Plant
4X C 4833 Water Storage (Flood Control Dam, Water Tower)
4X C 4835 Pumping Station, Domestic Water
4X C 4839 Water, Domestic Supply, Aqueduct
4X C 4841 Sewage Treatment Plant
4X C 4842 Sewage Sludge Drying Beds
4X C 4843 Sewage Pressure Control Station
4X C 4852 Garbage Grinding Station, Central
4X C 4853 Composting Plants
4X C 4854 Sanitary Land Fill
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4X C 4855 Refuse Disposal, Except Industrial Wastes
4X C 4856 Industrial Waste Disposal
4X C 4859 Other Solid Waste Disposal
4911 Petroleum Pipeline Right Of Way
4X D 4921 Freight Forwarding Service
4X D 4922 Crating & Packing Service
4X D 4923 Travel Arranging Services (Information, Freight Agencies)
4X D 4924 Transportation Ticket Services (Travel Agency, Ticket Office)
4X D 4990 Other Transportation, Communication & Utilities
51 C 5111 Automobiles & Other Motor Vehicles / Whsle
51 C 5112 Automotive Equipment / Whsle
51 C 5113 Tires & Tubes / Whsle
51 C 5121 Drugs, Drug Proprietaries & Druggist's Sundries / Whsle
51 C 5122 Paints & Varnishes (Shellac, Lacquers, Enamels) / Whsle
51 C 5129 Other Drugs, Chemicals & Allied Products / Whsle
51 C 5131 Dry Goods, Piece Goods & Notions / Whsle
51 C 5132 Apparel & Accessories, Hosiery & Lingerie / Whsle
51 C 5133 Footwear / Whsle
51 C 5141 Groceries, General Line / Whsle
51 C 5142 Dairy Products / Whsle
51 C 5143 Poultry Products / Whsle
51 C 5144 Confectionery / Whsle
51 C 5145 Fish, Fresh / Whsle
51 C 5146 Meat & Meat Products / Whsle
51 C 5147 Fruits & Vegetables / Whsle
51 C 5149 Other Groceries & Related Products / Whsle
51 C 5151 Cotton, Raw / Whsle
51 C 5152 Grain / Whsle
51 C 5153 Hides, Skins & Pelts / Whsle
51 C 5154 Exporters Of Leaf Tobacco
51 C 5155 Wool, Raw / Whsle
51 C 5156 Livestock / Whsle
51 C 5157 Horses / Whsle
51 C 5159 Farm Products, Raw (Except Cotton, Grain or Livestock) / Whsle
51 C 5161 Electrical Apparatus & Equipment; Wiring Supplies & Construction Equipment
51 C 5162 Electrical Appliances, TV & Radio Sets / Whsle
51 C 5163 Electronic Parts & Equipment / Whsle
51 C 5171 Hardware / Whsle
51 C 5172 Plumbing & Heating Equipment & Supplies / Whsle
51 C 5173 Air Conditioning, Refrigerated Equipment & Supplies / Whsle
51 C 5181 Commercial & Industrial Machinery, Equipment & Supplies/Whsle
51 C 5182 Farm Machinery & Equipment / Whsle
51 C 5183 Professional Equipment & Supplies / Whsle
51 C 5184 Equipment & Supplies For Service Establishments / Whsle
51 C 5185 Transportation Equipment & Supplies (Except Motor Vehicles)/Whsle
51 C 5189 Other Machinery, Equipment & Supplies / Whsle
51 C 5191 Metals & Minerals (Except Petroleum Products & Scrap) / Whsle
51 C 5192 Petroleum Bulk Stations & Terminals / Whsle
51 C 5193 Scrap & Waste Materials / Whsle
51 C 5194 Tobacco & Tobacco Products / Whsle
51 C 5195 Beer, Wine & Distilled Alcoholic Beverages / Whsle
51 C 5196 Paper & Paper Products / Whsle
51 C 5197 Furniture & Home Furnishings / Whsle
51 C 5198 Lumber & Construction Materials / Whsle
51 C 5199 Other Wholesale Trade
5X D 5211 Lumber Yards / Ret
5X D 5212 Building Materials / Ret
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
5X D 5220 Plumbing & Heating Equipment / Ret
5X D 5230 Paint, Glass & Wallpaper / Ret
5X D 5240 Electrical Supplies / Ret
5X D 5251 Hardware Stores / Ret
5X D 5252 Farm Equipment / Ret
5X D 5310 Department Stores / Ret
5X D 5320 Mail Order Houses / Ret
5X D 5330 Limited Price Variety Stores / Ret
5X D 5340 Merchandise Vending Machine Operators / Ret
5X D 5350 Selling Organizations, Direct, Headquarters of Door-To-Door
5X D 5391 Dry Goods & General Merchandise / Ret
5X D 5392 General Stores / Ret
54 B 5410 Grocery Stores, With or Without Fresh Meat / Ret
54 D 5421 Meat Markets / Ret
54 D 5422 Sea Food Markets / Ret
54 D 5430 Fruit & Vegetable Stands / Ret
54 D 5440 Candy, Nut & Confectionery / Ret
54 D 5450 Dairy Products Stores / Ret
54 C 5461 Retail Bakeries / Mfg
54 D 5462 Bakeries, Nonmfg, Retail
54 D 5491 Egg & Poultry Dealers / Ret
54 D 5499 Other Retail Trade - Food
55 D 5511 New & Used Cars & Trucks / Ret
55 D 5512 Automobiles, Used Cars & Trucks Only / Ret
55 D 5520 Tires, Batteries & Accessories / Ret
55 D 5530 Automobile Service Stations, With or Without Minor Repair Service
55 D 5591 Marine Craft & Accessories / Ret
55 D 5592 Aircraft Dealers / Ret
55 D 5599 Other Retail Trade - Auto trailers, Mobile Homes, Motorcycles
5X D 5610 Clothing Stores, Men’s & Boy’s / Ret
5X D 5620 Clothing Stores, Women's Ready To Wear / Ret
5X D 5630 Women's Accessories & Specialties / Ret
5X D 5640 Children's & Infant's Wear / Ret
5X D 5650 Family Clothing Stores / Ret
5X D 5660 Shoe Stores, Family, Men's, Women's or Children's / Ret
5X D 5670 Custom Tailors / Ret
5X D 5680 Furriers / Retail
5X D 5690 Other Retail Trade--Apparel & Accessories
5X D 5711 Furniture / Ret
5X D 5712 Floor Covering Stores / Ret
5X D 5713 Draperies, Curtains & Upholstery / Ret
5X D 5714 China, Glassware & Metalware Stores / Ret
5X D 5719 Other Furniture, Home Furnishings & Equipment / Ret
5X D 5720 Household Appliances / Ret
5X D 5731 Radios, TV's, Stereos / Ret
5X D 5732 Music Supplies / Ret
5X D 5733 Calculators, Computers & Other Office Machines / Ret
5A/B/C B 5810 Eating Places (Food & Both Food & Alcoholic Beverages)
5D B 5820 Bars, Drinking Establishments
59 D 5910 Drug & Proprietary / Ret
59 D 5920 Liquor, Wine & Beer (Packaged) / Ret
59 D 5931 Antique Stores / Ret
59 D 5932 Secondhand Merchandise / Ret
59 D 5941 Book Stores, New / Ret
59 D 5942 Stationery Stores / Ret
59 D 5951 Sporting Goods / Ret
59 D 5952 Bicycle & Bicycle Parts Dealers / Ret
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
59 D 5961 Feed Grain & Hay Stores / Ret
59 D 5969 Other Farm & Garden Supplies (Nurseries) / Ret
59 D 5970 Jewelry, Precious & Precious Metals, Including Custom Made/Ret
59 D 5981 Fuel Dealers, Coal, Wood, Ice / Ret
59 D 5982 Fuel Oil Dealers / Ret
59 D 5983 Bottled Gas / Ret
59 D 5991 Florists / Retail
59 D 5992 Cigars & Cigarettes / Ret
59 D 5993 Magazines & Newspapers / Ret
59 D 5994 Camera Shops & Photographic Supply Stores / Ret
59 D 5995 Gift, Novelty & Souvenir Shops (Ceramic Shop) / Ret
59 D 5996 Optical Goods Stores / Ret
59 D 5999 Other Retail Trade--Artist Supply, Luggage Shop, Pet Shop
61 B 6111 Banking Services
61 B 6112 Bank-Related Functions
61 B 6121 Savings & Loan Associations
61 B 6122 Agriculture, Business & Personal Credit Services (Credit Union)
61 B 6129 Other Credit Services (Loan Co.)
61 B 6131 Security Brokers, Dealer & Flotation Services
61 B 6132 Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers Services
61 B 6133 Security & Commodity Exchange
6X B 6141 Insurance Carriers
6X B 6142 Insurance Agents, Brokers & Services
6X B 6151 Real Estate Operators (Except Developers) & Lessors
6X B 6152 Real Estate Agents, Brokers & Management Services
6X B 6153 Title & Trust Companies
6X B 6154 Real Estate Subdividing & Developing Services
6X B 6155 Real Estate Operative Builders
6X B 6159 Other Real Estate & Related Services
6X B 6160 Holding & Investment Services
6X B 6190 Other Finance, Insurance & Real Estate Services
6A3 D 6211 Laundering, Dry Cleaning & Dyeing Services (Except Rug Cleaning)
6A1 D 6212 Linen Supply & Industrial Laundry Services
6A1 D 6213 Diaper Service
6A2 D 6214 Laundries, Self-Service
6A3 D 6215 Rug Cleaning & Repairing Plants
62 D 6220 Photographic Services (Including Commercial)
62 D 6231 Beauty Services
62 D 6232 Barber Services
62 D 6241 Funeral & Crematory Services
62 D 6242 Cemeteries
62 D 6251 Pressing & Alteration, & Clothing Repair Shops
62 D 6252 Fur Garments, Cleaning, Repairing, & Storage
62 D 6253 Shoe Repair Shops
62 D 6290 Other Personal Services
62 D 6311 Advertising Agencies
62 D 6312 Outdoor Advertising Services
62 D 6319 Other Advertising Services, NEC
62 D 6320 Collection Agencies , Accounts (Except Real Estate)
62 D 6332 Blueprinting & Photocopying Services
62 D 6339 Stenographic Services & Other Duplicating & Mailing Services
62 D 6341 Window Cleaning Services
62 D 6342 Disinfecting & Exterminating Service
62 D 6349 Building Maintenance, Janitorial, & Similar Services
62 D 6350 News Syndicate Services
62 D 6360 Commercial Employment Agencies
63 D 6371 Farm Product Warehousing & Storage (Barns, Livestock Shelters)
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
63 D 6372 Stockyards (Not Exclusively For Fattening Livestock)
63 E 6373 Refrigerated Warehousing, Except Food Lockers
63 E 6374 Rental Of Cold Storage Lockers
63 E 6375 Commercial Warehousing & Storage
63 E 6379 Industrial Warehousing & Storage
62 D 6391 Research Development & Testing Services
62 D 6392 Business & Management Consulting Services
62 D 6393 Detective & Protective Services
62 D 6394 Equipment Rental & Leasing Services
62 D 6395 Photographic Laboratories, Not Manufacturing
62 D 6396 Trading Stamp Redemption Store
62 D 6397 Automobile & Truck Rental Services
62 D 6398 Motion Picture Distribution & Services
62 D 6399 Other Business Svc (Garbage Collctn; Sewer or Answering Svc)
6B D 6412 Car Wash
64 D 6411 Automobile Repair Shops, General
64 D 6419 Other Automobile Services
64 D 6491 Electric Appliance Repair (Except Radio, TV, or Refrigeration)
64 D 6492 Television & Radio Repair Services
64 D 6493 Watch, Clock & Jewelry Repair Services
64 D 6494 Re-upholstery & Furniture Repair Services
64 D 6499 Other Repair Services (Tool, Locksmith, Musical Instrument, Hydraulic)
6X B 6500 Professional Office Building
65 B 6511 Physicians Services
65 B 6512 Dental Services
65 B 6513 Hospital Services
65 B 6514 Medical Laboratory Services
65 B 6515 Dental Laboratories
65 per person 6516 Convalescent Homes, Sanitariums, Nursing Homes
65 B 6517 Medical Clinic, Out- Patient Service
65 B 6519 Other Medical & Health Services
6X B 6520 Legal Services
6X B 6591 Architectural & Engineering Services
6X B 6592 Scientific & Educational Research Services
6X B 6593 Accounting, Auditing & Bookkeeping Services
6X B 6599 Other Professional Services
66 D 6611 Building Construction--General Contractor Services
66 D 6619 Other General Construction Contractor Services
66 D 6621 Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning Services
66 D 6622 Painting, Paper Hanging & Decorating Services
66 D 6623 Electrical Work / Contractors
66 D 6624 Masonry, Stonework, Tile Setting & Plastering Services
66 D 6625 Carpentry Work / Contractors
66 D 6626 Roofing & Sheet Metal Services
66 D 6627 Concrete Construction, Other Than Paving, Foundation & Excavation
66 D 6628 Water Well Drilling / Contractors
66 D 6629 Other Special Construction Trade Services
67 B 6710 Executive, Legislative & Judicial Functions (Offices, Courts)
67 B 6719 Other Publicly Owned Property
67 B 6721 Police Protection & Related Activities
67 B 6722 Fire Stations, Community Fire Protection
67 B 6729 Other Protective Functions & Their Related Activities
67 B 6730 Post Offices & Related Facilities
67 per person 6741 Prisons, State, Federal or Other Civil Government
67 per person 6749 Other Correctional Institutions
67 B 6755 Recruiting Station, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, etc.
67 B 6759 Other Military Bases & Reservation
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
6X 6810 School District Administration Office
68 6811 Nursery Schools
68 6812 Elementary Schools
68 6813 Junior High Schools
68 6814 Senior High Schools
68 6815 Private Handicap Schools
68 B 6816 Parochial Schools
68 B 6821 Universities & Colleges
68 B 6822 Junior Colleges
68 B 6823 Theological Seminaries
68 B 6831 Vocational or Trade Schools
68 B 6832 Business & Stenographic Schools
68 B 6833 Barber & Beauty Schools
68 B 6834 Art & Music Schools
68 B 6835 Dance Studios & Schools
68 B 6836 Driving Schools
68 B 6839 Other Special Training & Schooling (Language, Modeling)
69 D 6911 Churches, Temples, Sunday School Facilities
69 D 6919 Other Religious Activities (Retreats, Camps, Diocesan Offices)
69 D 6920 Welfare & Charitable Services (Red Cross, Salvation Army)
69 D 6991 Business Associations, (Grange Halls, Trade or Farm Assn.)
69 D 6992 Professional Membership Organizations
69 D 6993 Labor Unions & Similar Labor Organizations
69 D 6994 Civic, Social & Fraternal Associations
69 D 6999 Misc. Services (Historical Clubs, City Clubs, Youth Projects)
68 D 7111 Libraries
68 D 7112 Museum, Historical Exhibit
68 D 7113 Art Galleries
68 D 7119 Other Cultural Activities
68 D 7123 Arboreta & Botanical Gardens
7X D 7212 Theater, Motion Picture, Indoor
7X D 7213 Drive-In Motion Picture Theater
7X D 7214 Theater, Legitimate Stage
7X D 7219 Other Entertainment Assembly
7X D 7221 Stadium, Football, Baseball, Track & Field or Other
7X D 7223 Race Track Operation, Horse, Dog, Automobile
7X D 7231 Auditorium
7X D 7232 Exhibition Hall
7X D 7239 Other Miscellaneous Assembly
7X D 7290 Other Public Assembly
7X D 7311 Fairground
7X D 7312 Amusement Park
7X D 7391 Penny Arcades
7X D 7393 Golf Driving Ranges
7X D 7399 Other Amusements (Pool Hall, Shooting Range)
7X D 7411 Golf Course, Without Country Club
7X D 7412 Golf Course, With Country Club
7X D 7413 Tennis Courts
7X D 7414 Ice Skating Rinks
7X D 7415 Roller Skating Rinks
7X D 7416 Riding Stable
7X D 7417 Bowling Alleys
7X D 7419 Other Sports Activities
7X D 7421 Play Lot or Tot Lot (Preschool or Elementary School-Aged Children)
7X D 7422 Playground, Equipped (Not Part of Another Facility)
7X D 7423 Play Fields or Athletic Fields
7X D 7424 Recreation Center, General
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
7X D 7425 Gymnasiums & Athletic Clubs
7X D 7429 Other Playground & Athletic Areas
7X D 7431 Swimming Beach, Designated
7X D 7432 Swimming Pool, Indoor or Covered (Not Part of Residential Use)
7X D 7442 Boat Rentals & Boat Access Sites
7X D 7449 Other Marinas
7X D 7491 Camping & Picnicking Areas
7X D 7499 Other Recreation Not Elsewhere Classified
7X D 7520 Group or Organized Camps (Girl Scout & Boy Scout, etc.)
7X D 7620 Park, Ornamental (Plaza or Monument or Traffic Circle, etc.)
7X D 7625 Park, Private Leisure
7X D 7630 Open Space, Natural Area, Wetland
7X D 7690 Other Parks
7X D 7900 Other Cultural, Entertainment & Recreational Activities
C 8010 Orchards, Tree Fruit or Nut
C 8020 Intensive Grain or Field Crop
C 8030 Bush, Fruit, Berries
C 8040 Pasture, Cows, Sheep, Cattle
C 8120 Farm, Predominant Crop - Cash Grain (Wheat, Corn, etc.)
C 8130 Farm, Predominant Crop - Field Crop Except Cash Grain or Fiber
C 8141 Farm, Predominant Crop - Tree Fruits (Pear, Date, Lemon, etc.)
C 8142 Farm, Predominant Crop - Tree Nuts
C 8143 Farm, Predominant Crop - Vegetables, Ground Fruits
C 8150 Farm, Predominant Product - Dairy Goods (Milk, Cheese, etc.)
C 8161 Farm, Predominant Activity - Cattle Raising
C 8170 Farm, Predominant Activity - Poultry Raising (Incl. Egg Products)
C 8180 Farm, General, No Predominant Crop or Activity
C 8192 Farm, Predominant Activity - Nursery or Flower Stock
C 8194 Farm, Predominant Activity - Horse Raising
C 8199 Other Agricultural & Related Activities
C 8213 Grist Milling Services
C 8219 Other Agricultural Processing Services
82 B 8221 Veterinarian Service
82 B 8222 Animal Hospitals & Other Veterinary Service
C 8223 Poultry Hatcheries
C 8229 Animal Breeding & Other Husbandry Services (Worm Hatchery)
C 8310 Timberlands
C 8321 Forest Nurseries
C 8390 Guard Station, Game Management Area & Other Forestry Activities
C 8542 Quarrying - Crushed & Broken Stone Including Riprap
C 8543 Quarrying - Sand & Gravel
C 8553 Crude Petroleum & Gas Field Services
C 8900 Other Resource Production & Extraction
9100 Vacant, Unused, Undeveloped Land
9101 Broadleaf Brush
9102 Stump Land, Cutover Land
9103 Sand Dunes
9220 Non-reserve Forests
9310 Rivers, Creeks, Streams
9320 Lakes, Ponds, Reservoirs
9390 Other Water Areas (Swamps)
9395 Sand Bars
9400 Unused Building or Structure
9410 Vacant Shop or Office
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
City of Eugene
System Development Charge Methodologies
Appendix B
Transportation
System Development Charge
System-Specific Methodology and Details
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Transportation System Development Charge Detail
Transportation SDC Methodology
The transportation system development charge (SDC) methodology is based on a system-wide
cost per trip, where the costs associated with meeting future growth needs are divided by the
projected growth in trips. The methodology includes both improvement and reimbursement SDC
components.
Development of the SDC includes the following basic steps:
Determine growth in trips
Determine growth share of system costs
Calculate the system-wide costs per trip
Develop SDC rate schedule
These steps are discussed further below.
1.0 Growth in Trips
To evaluate the roadway capacity needs and the amount of vehicle trips that are generated by
growth, the regional travel demand model was utilized. Table B-1 shows the projected growth in
the number of trip ends for the 2035 Transportation System Plan period, broken down by trip ends
that have both an origin and destination within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) (internal-
internal), and trip ends that have one end outside of the UGB (internal-external & external-
internal).
Like most infrastructure systems, roadway systems are designed to accommodate peak rates of
use, which typically occur during the weekday afternoon period between the hours of 4 and 6 p.m.
(the “PM peak”). Therefore, roadway system capacity is typically measured by trip generation
during the average weekday PM peak hour.
Table B-1
Model Vehicle Weekday PM Peak Hour Trip Ends (within the City’s Currently Acknowledged UGB)
Internal-Internal
Internal-External &
External-Internal Total
Existing Trip Ends 104,128 52,818 156,949
Projected Trip Ends 131,128 66,790 197,918
Growth Trip Ends 27,000 13,972 40,972
Source: Lane Council of Governments EMME travel demand model for the Eugene 2035
Transportation System Plan
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.0 Growth Share of System Costs
Future development capacity needs will be met by a combination of existing system available
capacity and future improvements that increase the level of performance of existing facilities, or
add new facilities. The value of existing system capacity is referred to as the reimbursement fee
cost basis, while the value of future growth-related improvements is referred to as the
improvement fee cost basis.
The development of the improvement and reimbursement cost bases are summarized below.
2.1 Reimbursement Fee
Determination of the reimbursement fee cost basis includes the following steps:
1. Reserve capacity of existing roadways is determined,
2. The existing system value net of contributions is estimated, and
3. The existing system value for growth in the planning period (the reimbursement fee
cost basis) is determined.
2.1.1 Existing System Reserve Capacity
The LCOG EMME travel demand model was used to determine the portion of
the existing roadway network that has reserve capacity for growth in the
planning period. The reserve capacity of the roadway system was determined
by comparing the traffic volume on each roadway to the capacity of that
roadway (based on level of service E). If the future volume was less than
capacity, the amount available for growth was calculated as a simple ratio of the
future volume less the existing volume to the capacity of the particular roadway.
If the total volume in 2035 exceeded the capacity, the amount of capacity
available for growth was calculated as a ratio of the capacity less the existing
daily traffic volume to the capacity.
A weighted average reserve capacity was determined for each roadway
classification (excluding local streets and state highway facilities). The resulting
calculations are shown in Table B-2. This shows the reimbursement fee is
based, in part, on the value of unused capacity available to future users.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.1.2 Existing System Valuation
The Geographic Information System (GIS) was used to produce an inventory of
existing arterial and collector roadways. The inventory included the necessary
data to determine the replacement cost of each roadway segment, broken down
into the following cost components:
Right of way
Pavement (rehabilitation and new construction costs)
Curb and gutter
Sidewalk
Bike lanes
Street lights
Traffic signals
For roadways transferred to the City from other agencies, only the costs of
recent reconstruction improvements are included in the system value, since the
original construction was not funded by the City. Local streets are excluded
from the reimbursement fee cost basis, as local streets are generally funded by
developers or assessments. By excluding local street value, the reimbursement
fee excludes prior contributions by existing users consistent with ORS
223.304(1)(a)(B).
As for roadways, GIS data was used to develop an inventory of off-street bike
and pedestrian facilities, as well as on- and off-system bridges. The current
value of each facility was estimated by applying the growth in the Engineering
News Record Construction Cost Index since the time of construction to the
original facility cost.
The existing system value for all facilities is reduced by estimated assessments
and other funding sources (grants and contributions), to determine the net
system value. These estimates are provided in the “Assessable Cost” and
“Other Funding” columns on Table B-2.
2.1.3 Growth Share of Existing System Value (Reimbursement Fee
Cost Basis)
The reimbursement fee cost basis for roadways is determined by applying the
existing system reserve capacity for growth within the planning period,
(calculated by multiplying the net system value by the average reserve capacity
for each road classification). For bridges, the growth share is assumed to be
the system average reserve capacity (across all roadway classifications).
The existing system value associated with active travel modes (bicycle and
pedestrian facilities) is excluded from the reimbursement fee cost basis, as
there is no reserve capacity. As is discussed later in Section 2.2.2.4, the
planned level of service for bicycle and pedestrian facilities is higher than the
existing level of service; therefore, the existing system facilities are not
adequate to meet the needs of existing development (i.e., there is no reserve
capacity for future growth).
The reimbursement fee cost basis is provided in Table B-2.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.2 Improvement Fee
The improvement fee is calculated to obtain the cost of capital improvements for the
projected transportation system needs of future users. Determination of the improvement
fee cost basis includes the following steps:
1. The portion of project costs related to increasing system capacity is determined.
2. New capacity costs are allocated between growth and existing development,
based on the portion of each project that relates to providing capacity for growth
vs. addressing an existing deficiency or future service level enhancement related
to existing development.
3. Capacity costs are reduced by any external funding sources (assessments,
grants, contributions by other agencies) that are projected to cover a portion of
growth’s new capacity costs.
The improvement fee cost basis is shown in Table B-3.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.2.1 New Capacity Costs
Detailed cost estimates for each project included in the Transportation SDC
Project Plan were reviewed to determine what portion of project costs related to
replacement of existing capacity versus expanding existing facilities or
constructing new facilities. Existing facility replacement costs included overlay
or reconstruction of existing pavement, as well as replacement of existing
facilities (e.g., bridges or other crossings). This shows that, in calculating the
improvement fee, the City considered the projected costs of the capacity-
increasing capital improvements identified on the Transportation SDC Project
Plan.
2.2.2 Growth Share of Capacity Costs
For purposes of determining SDC-eligibility, individual projects from the
Transportation SDC Project List (“Project List”) are analyzed to determine first,
the portion of costs that expand or provide new capacity, versus replacing
existing system capacity. Second, the new capacity costs are further analyzed
to determine the portion of costs related to meeting the needs of future growth
(the “growth share”) versus costs associated with raising the level of service for
existing development.
The general methods used for determining the growth share of costs for each
project on the Project List are summarized below. These methods show that, in
calculating the improvement fee, the City considered the increased capacity
needed to meet the demands of future transportation system users.
2.2.2.1 New Roadways
New roadways and expansions driven by future development capacity
requirements are allocated 100% to growth, since the capacity is needed
entirely for new development.
2.2.2.2 Upgrades to Roadways and Intersections
Improvements to existing facilities to address safety, modernization, and
other performance considerations provide capacity for growth and
enhanced performance for existing development, so the costs are
allocated in proportion to the utilization of the facilities. Specifically,
weekday PM peak hour travel demand data by roadway link (from the
LCOG travel demand model) are used to quantify growth’s utilization of
future roadway and intersection capacity. The growth share is estimated
based on the growth in trips over the planning period, as a percentage of
total future trips for individual roadway links. If a link provides regional
‘through’ traffic capacity, an adjustment to the growth share is made to
exclude the portion of trips that represent “through” versus local trips.
2.2.2.3 Operational Improvements
Capacity enhancing improvements include new traffic signals, as well as
improvements that enhance intersections performance (accessible
pedestrian signals and master traffic communications plan). The growth
share for these improvements is determined based on growth’s share of
future person trips, as estimated from the LCOG travel demand model.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.2.2.4 New Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Active Modes)
The growth share for bike and pedestrian facilities is determined based
on the planned level of service (LOS) for each facility type. The planned
LOS for purposes of this analysis is defined as the quantity of future
facilities per capita served.
The following equation shows the calculation of the planned LOS for
bicycle and pedestrian facility analysis:
LOSPlannedServedPopulationFuture
QPlannedQExisting
Where:
Q = quantity (miles of bicycle or pedestrian facilities)
The existing and future miles of bicycle and pedestrian facilities are
shown in Table B-4, based on the Project List. Population data for the
estimated base year and future year (2035) are presented in Table B-5.
Table B-4
Existing and Future Bike and Pedestrian Facilities (miles)
Existing
New
(Project
List)1
Future
(Total)
Shared Use Path 43.3 9.5 52.8
Bicycle Facilities 160.2 121.4 281.6
Pedestrian Facility 223.2 77.4 300.6
1 Includes multimodal and stand-alone bicycle and pedestrian projects
Table B-5
Population Growth
Base Year Future Year (2035) Population Growth
Population 177,332 219,060 41,728
Source: Table 3-1 Transportation System Plan, February 2017
Table B-6 presents the existing and planned LOS for each facility type,
based on the existing and planned future facilities presented in Table B-4,
divided by the estimated existing and projected population presented in
Table B-5. (For purposes of this analysis, population figures are divided
by 1,000 in order to show the planned LOS per 1,000 population in Table
B-6.)
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Table B-6
Existing and Planned LOS (miles per 1,000 population)
Existing LOS Planned LOS
Shared Use Path 0.244 0.241
Bike Facility 0.903 1.286
Pedestrian Facility 1.259 1.372
The capacity requirements, or number of miles, needed for the existing
population and for the growth population are estimated by multiplying the
planned (future) LOS for each facility type (from Table B-6) by the
estimated population (in 1,000’s) of each group (from Table B-5).
These calculations are shown in Table B-7; each column is then
described following the table.
Table B-7
Existing and Growth Capacity Needs for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities (Miles)
Existing
Population
Need (1)
Existing
Inventory
(2)
Existing Need from
Project Improvements
(3)
Growth Need from
Project Improvements
(4)
Multimodal
Projects
Stand-Alone
Projects
Multimodal
Projects
Stand-Alone
Projects
Shared Use Paths 42.7 43.3 0 0 0 9.5
Bicycle Facility 228.0 160.2 24.6 43.2 24.7 28.9
Pedestrian Facility 243.4 223.0 21 0 22.6 34.6
(1) Existing Population Need
The need for the existing population is equal to the planned LOS multiplied by the
estimated base year population (from Table B-5) in 1,000’s.
(2) Existing Inventory
Existing users’ needs are assumed to be met first by the existing inventory of facilities;
column (2) shows the existing facility miles from Table B-4.
(3) Existing Need from Project Improvements
The difference between columns 1 and column 2 is the portion of existing development’s
need that will be met by the Project List improvements. Some of the need is met through
the multimodal projects that add bicycle and pedestrian facilities; the remainder will be met
through the stand-alone bicycle and pedestrian improvements on the Project List.
(4) Growth Need from Project Improvements
The total facility need required by growth is equal to the planned LOS (from Table B-6)
multiplied by the projected increase in population over the planning period (from Table B-5)
in 1,000’s.
Table B-8 shows the existing and growth shares for the stand-alone
bicycle and pedestrian improvements by project type.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Table B-8
Existing and Growth Share of Stand-Alone Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Total Stand-
Alone
Improvements
(TSDC Project
List)
Existing
Share
Existing % Growth
Share
Growth %
Shared-Use Path 9.5 0 0% 9.5 100%
Bicycle Facility 72.2 43.2 60% 28.9 40%
Pedestrian Facility 34.6 0 0% 34.6 100%
2.2.3 Growth Share of Project List Cost (Improvement Fee Cost
Basis)
The improvement fee cost basis is determined by applying the growth share of
new capacity costs for each project, by the project new capacity costs, and
deducting any other funds to be applied. Other funding sources include
assessments which are likely to pay for a portion of development-driven (based
on the City’s current assessment policy), and grants for bicycle and pedestrian
facilities.
The improvement fee cost basis is provided in Table B-3.
3.0 System-Wide Cost per Trip
The system wide costs per trip (also known as “costs per vehicle trip” or “costs per trip end”) are
determined by dividing the improvement and reimbursement fee cost bases (as shown in Tables
B-2 and B-3) by the projected growth in weekday PM peak hour trip ends (shown in Table B-1).
3.1 Reimbursement Fee
Table B-2 shows the result of this calculation for the reimbursement fee in the column
entitled “SDC per Vehicle Trip”.
3.2 Improvement Fee
The improvement fee SDC per trip is shown in Table B-3 in the column entitled “SDC per
Vehicle Trip”.
4.0 SDC Rate Calculations
4.1 Formula
The transportation SDC for an individual development is based on the total cost per trip
(including the reimbursement and improvement components) and the number of weekday
PM peak hour trips attributable to a particular development. This calculation is as follows:
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Cost per Trip X Number of Development Trips = SDC for Development
Where:
Cost per Trip = Cost per Trip (reimbursement) + Cost per Trip (improvement),
and
Number of Development Trips = Trip Generation Rate X Pass-by Adjustment X
Development Size (based upon the unit of measure).
Table B-9, which is located in Appendix F, shows the assumptions for the SDC rate
schedule, including the total cost per trip and the trip rates and adjustments by land use
category.
4.2 Assigned Trip Generation Rates
The standard practice in the transportation industry is to use information contained in the
Trip Generation Manual, as published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) to
calculate the SDCs for individual developments. ITE trip rates by land use category are
based on studies from around the country, and, in the absence of local data, represent the
best available source of trip data for specific land uses.
Pass-by trip adjustments to ITE trip rates have been applied to the ITE trip rates. Also
referred to as linked trips or trip chaining, pass-by trips refer to trips that occur when a
motorist is already on the roadway (as in the case of a traveler stopping by a fast food
restaurant on the way home from work.) In this case, the motorist making a stop while
“passing by” is counted as a trip generated by the restaurant, but it does not represent a
new trip on the roadway.
Pass-by adjustments are provided for those uses included in the Trip Generation Manual.
An applicant may choose to submit a request for an alternative pass-by adjustment through
the Alternate Calculation method.
Except when the City Engineer has approved an applicant’s election to use the Alternate
Trip Generation Calculation method or an alternative pass-by adjustment, the City
Engineer shall apply rates included in the Transportation Trip Rates table, Table B-9, which
is located in Appendix F. Descriptions for the land use categories included in Table B-9 are
included in Appendix A and are based upon ITE land use categories. A land use category
may be assigned by the City Engineer should a proposed use not be accurately
represented by one of the published transportation use codes. In addition, trip rates for
published use codes may be alternatively assigned as best available information in the
case that a revised ITE trip rate is published prior to an administrative modification to the
Transportation Trip Rates Table (Table B-9).
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4.3 Alternate Trip Generation Calculation
Prior to the issuance of a permit requiring payment of Transportation SDCs, an applicant
may elect to use the alternate calculation method (ACM) of determining the trip generation
for the type of development proposed, as provided here. This election must be by written
application to the City Engineer, must be accompanied with payment or the agreement to
pay the transportation SDC using the standard calculation and must be approved by the
City Engineer. Issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for the development will be
contingent on a final decision by the City Engineer on the alternate calculation submitted
for review. In the absence of the City Engineer's approval of the applicant's election to use
an alternate calculation, the standard calculation shall be used. All calculations shall be
based on the site’s trip generation that occurs concurrently with the PM peak hour of the
City’s transportation system (as defined as the peak one-hour period between 4 PM and 6
PM).
4.3.1 Existing Traffic Study Standards
If an applicant provides previously performed traffic studies that meet the
standards in section 4.3 and have been approved by the City Engineer, the trip
rate based upon those studies may be used to calculate the transportation
SDC. Except that the studies may come from geographic locations other than
those listed in section 4.3.3.3 the studies shall meet the standards set in section
4.3.3 and shall not be more than ten years old.
4.3.2 Independent Traffic Study
If an applicant does not want to use the trip generation rates in section 4.2 or to
have the rate determined under section 4.3.1, with the prior written approval of
the City Engineer by complying with the standards in section 4.3.3 below, the
applicant may conduct an independent survey of the proposed development's
trip generation rate.
4.3.3 Transportation Traffic Study Criteria
To be used to calculate the Transportation SDC for a proposed development
under this section 4.3.3, a transportation study must meet the following
standards unless the City Engineer modifies them because of unique
circumstances:
4.3.3.1 Qualifications of Study
The completed study must be stamped by either a licensed civil engineer
qualified to conduct traffic studies or a licensed transportation engineer,
who has been approved by the City Engineer.
4.3.3.2 Development Specifications
The study shall be based upon analyses of the trip-making characteristics
of similar facilities, both in size and type of land uses operating at full
occupancy/capacity.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4.3.3.3 Specifications for Number of Sites
A minimum of five local sites with comparable land use shall be proposed
for the study and approved by the City Engineer. If, in the sole discretion
of the City Engineer, there are insufficient local sites, the City Engineer
will consider alternate sites within the states of Idaho, Oregon or
Washington. The sites shall have land uses that are of comparable
general description to that proposed upon build-out.
4.3.3.4 Specifications for Traffic Study Scope
The assumptions, parameters and methodology included in the traffic
study shall be scoped in accordance with both the methodology
described in the current edition of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers Trip Generation Manual, and direction provided by the City
Engineer.
4.3.3.5 Specifications for Description and Drawings
The request to use the alternate calculation shall include a detailed
description and drawing of the proposed development site, a description
and drawing of each sampling site, a description of why these sites are
representative of the impact likely to be generated by the proposed
development and such other information as may be required by the City
Engineer.
4.3.3.6 Specifications for Report Format
The completed report of the study shall be in a form approved by the City
Engineer and upon its completion shall be submitted to the City Engineer
for approval.
4.3.4 Approval & Outcome of Alternate Calculation Traffic Study
The City Engineer may approve, approve with conditions, or reject the trip
generation rate calculated in a report prepared under section 4.3 hereof. Upon
approval, the trip rate for the proposed development shall be used to calculate
the transportation SDC. In the event that the alternate calculation results in a
transportation SDC less than the standard calculation, upon approval of the
alternate calculation by the City Engineer, the City shall refund the excess
transportation SDC collected to the applicant or reduce the amount the
applicant agreed to pay. If the approved alternate calculation results in a
transportation SDC greater than the standard calculation, the applicant shall
pay the underage to the City or modify the agreement to pay to include the
underage. In the event the applicant fails to promptly pay the underage to the
City or to promptly modify the agreement to pay, the City may suspend the
permit for the development until payment is made or the agreement to pay is
modified to include the underage.
4.4 Compact Development Adjustments
As part of the City’s strategies to promote compact development and the goals of Envision
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Eugene, certain types of compact development may receive one or more adjustments to
reduce their calculated Transportation SDC. These compact development adjustments fall
within one of the following categories, as summarized in Table B-10:
Location-Based
o Eugene Downtown Plan boundary
o West University Commercial District
o Residential or mixed-use development along a key corridor
o Nodal development
Transit Proximity
o Frequent Transit Network (FTN)
Transportation demand management (TDM)
Secondary Accessory dwelling units (SADUs)
The location-based and transit proximity compact development adjustments are
geographically based adjustments. The areas in which these geographic adjustments may
apply are shown on the maps in Appendix B of the Transportation SDC Project Plan.
Compact development adjustments:
Shall be applied to the calculated base transportation SDC fee, prior to the
application of any credits or impact reductions;
Are cumulative (using the categories listed in Table B-10), not to exceed 100% of
the transportation SDC; and
May not to be applied to single-family detached or duplex housing; and
Are subject to annual caps. See section 7.3 of General Methodology and section
4.4.4, below.
4.4.1 Location-Based Compact Development Adjustments
There are four types of location-based compact development adjustments. The city
will not approve more than one type of location-based compact development
adjustment for a development, even if the development meets the criteria for more
than one type.
4.4.1.1 Development within the Eugene Downtown Plan Boundary
Development within the boundary of the Eugene Downtown Plan shall be
given a compact development adjustment when at least one of the following
criteria is met.
A. Re-development of Existing Building or Tenant Space with a
Use Generally Found in a Shopping Center
A 100% reduction to the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted
for re-development located within the Downtown Plan Boundary that
changes the use of an existing commercial tenant space or building from
a use generally found in a shopping center to another use also generally
found in a shopping center.
For purposes of this adjustment, a “use generally found in a shopping
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
center” includes commercial/retail stores and non-merchandising
facilities as described in the definition of Shopping Center in Appendix A
to the General Methodology.
Development is not eligible to receive this compact development
adjustment if it:
o Changes use from a shopping center use to a non-shopping-center
use or vice-versa (e.g., commercial to residential), or
o Includes a new building, or
o Includes a building addition (the addition of floor area).
B. Development Subject to Density and/or FAR Requirements
A 30% reduction of the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted
for new commercial or mixed-use buildings, building additions, and
changes of use not consistent with section 4.4.1.1A above if such
development is:
o Located within the Downtown Plan boundary; and
o Located within a zone or overlay zone (e.g., /TD Overlay) that
requires density and/or minimum floor area ratios (FAR); and
o Meets the minimum land use code requirements for the zoning
area (e.g., FARs that are adjusted to a lower ratio will not receive
the compact development adjustment).
C. Development Not Subject to Density and/or FAR
Requirements
A 30% reduction of the calculated transportation SDCs shall be granted
for new commercial or mixed-use buildings, building additions, and
changes of use not consistent with section 4.4.1.1A above if such
development:
o Is located within the Downtown Plan boundary; and
o Is not located inside a zone or overlay zone (e.g., /TD Overlay)
that requires additional density standards; and
o Has a floor area of at least 0.65 square feet for each 1 square
foot of lot area.
For the purposes of calculating the floor area for the adjustment
described in 4.4.1.1.C, floor area shall be defined as the entire floor area
of the building, as measured from the outside of the exterior walls,
including that portion of the basement that is designed and constructed
as permanent underground parking, office, or retail use; stairs and
elevator shafts shall be counted once per every two floors that they
service.
D. Residential-Only Buildings
A 30% reduction to the calculated Transportation SDC shall be granted
for new residential-only buildings, additions to existing residential-only
buildings, or changes of use of existing buildings to residential-only uses
which are located in the Downtown Plan boundary and which are
designed with a minimum of twenty (20) residential dwelling units per net
acre.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4.4.1.2 Location-Based Adjustment for Development within the
West University Commercial District
A 100% reduction to the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted
for re-development that:
o Is located within the West University Commercial District; and
o Changes the use of an existing commercial tenant space or
building from a use generally found in a shopping center to
another use also generally found in a shopping center.
For purposes of this adjustment, a “use generally found in a shopping
center” includes commercial/retail stores and non-merchandising
facilities as described in the definition of Shopping Center in Appendix A
to the General Methodology.
Development is not eligible to receive this compact development
adjustment if it:
o Changes use from a shopping center use to a non-shopping-
center use or vice-versa (e.g., commercial to residential), or
o Includes a new building or
o Includes a building addition (the addition of floor area).
4.4.1.3 Location-Based Adjustment for Residential or Mixed-Use
Development along a Key Corridor
The Envision Eugene Plan has identified key transportation corridors that
are intended to have transit service connecting downtown to numerous core
commercial areas.
A 15% reduction to the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted for
multi-family apartments and condominiums, rowhouses, townhouses, and
mixed-use development that:
o Is located on property with frontage on identified key corridors; and
o Provides pedestrian corridors from the development to the key
corridor right-of-way.
Single-family detached and duplex housing are not eligible to receive this
adjustment.
4.4.1.4 Location-Based Adjustment for Nodal Development
The General Plan (Metro Plan) recognizes the plan designation of “Nodal
Development Area (Nodes)”. The intent of this designation is to establish
areas for mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly development that will reduce
reliance on the automobile. There is evidence that shows that this type of
development can result in reduced automobile trip generation rates.
Furthermore, the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), in OAR 660-
012-0060(5) states in part that:
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
. . . local governments shall give full credit for potential reduction in
vehicle trips for uses located in mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly
centers . . .
and,
. . . local governments shall assume that uses located within a
mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center, or neighborhood, will generate
10% fewer daily and peak hour trips than are specified in available
published estimates, such as those provided by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. . .
A 10% reduction to the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted for
commercial development, multi-family apartments and condominiums,
rowhouses, and townhouses in Nodal Development Areas.
Single-family detached and duplex housing are not eligible to receive this
adjustment.
4.4.2 Transit Proximity Compact Development Adjustments - Frequent
Transit Network
The Frequent Transit Network (FTN), as defined by Lane Transit District, provides
transit service for at least 16 hours per day with an average trip frequency of 15
minutes or better. The City FTN area is shown on the maps in Appendix B of the
Transportation SDC Project Plan, which show the rights-of-way included in the
Frequent Transit Network and the centerlines for the FTN corridors.
The FTN includes both current and future routes that will provide the above defined
level of service. Multi-family apartments and condominiums, rowhouses,
townhouses, and mixed-use development will be granted a reduction of the
calculated transportation SDC based on the following proximities to the centerlines
of the FTN corridors:
A. Proposed development located wholly or partially within 0.25 miles of the
FTN centerline will be granted a 10% reduction, unless a physical condition
(e.g. a water body or intervening development) precludes direct pedestrian
access between the development and the FTN; OR
B. Proposed development located wholly or partially within 0.5 miles of the
FTN centerline will be granted a 5% reduction, unless a physical condition
(e.g. a water body or intervening development) precludes direct pedestrian
access between the development and the FTN.
The city will not approve more than one type of transit proximity compact
development adjustment for a development, even if the development meets the
criteria for more than one type.
Single-family detached and duplex housing are not eligible to receive this
adjustment.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
4.4.3 Transportation Demand Management Compact Development
Adjustments
A development that qualifies for one of the location and/or transit proximity
adjustments listed above may also be eligible for a Transportation Demand
Management (TDM) compact development adjustment.
A 10% reduction to the calculated transportation SDC shall be granted for TDMs
that meet the following TDM criteria:
o Have a signed TDM agreement with the City, pursuant to EC 9.8030(10);
o Meet one of the location and/or transit proximity criteria described above; and
o Reduce the number of parking spaces otherwise required by code. TDMs used
to increase the number of parking spaces are not granted adjustments.
A TDM that has been additionally reviewed by the City Engineer as a transportation
impact reduction, per the SDC Methodology, to reduce the demand from the
development for the future construction of identifiable capital improvements may
receive the 10% TDM reduction (in addition to the approved impact reduction), if it
meets the TDM criteria above.
4.4.4 AccessorySecondary Dwelling Unit Compact Development
Adjustments
As part of the City’s strategies to further efficient housing options and the goals of
Envision Eugene, new secondaryaccessory dwelling units (SADUs) shall be
granted a reduction equal to 50100% of the calculated transportation SDC, prior to
the application of any credits or other adjustments. This reduction will be in addition
to any of the applicable location, transit proximity, and/or TDM adjustments listed
above. This reduction is available to any structure meeting the definition of
“Accessory Dwelling Unit” provided in Appendix A to the City of Eugene’s System
Development Charge Methodologies, regardless of whether the structure is referred
to as an “accessory dwelling unit” or an additional “one-family dwelling” on the
same lot as another.
Commencing with the 2019 fiscal year, and continuing each fiscal year thereafter,
the City may grant a base amount totaling $40,000.00 annually for accessory
dwelling unit compact development adjustments. Each fiscal year there is a change
in the rate for the system development charges for residential development, the
base amount for that fiscal year shall be adjusted in an amount proportionate to that
change. If any portion of the authorized base amount remains unallocated at the
end of a fiscal year, that portion shall be added to the authorized base amount for
the next fiscal year.
Table B-10 – Compact Development Adjustments
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Criteria1 % Reduction of
Transportation SDC3
Location (only one applies)
Commercial, residential1, or mixed-use2 development in the Eugene Downtown Plan
boundary
o Re-development of existing building or tenant space
from and to a use generally found in a shopping center
100%
o Commercial or mixed-use development meeting either
(1) land use code density and/or FAR requirements, or
(2) SDC-imposed 0.65 floor area ratio (for sites outside
zoning areas with minimum requirements)
30%
o Residential–only buildings 30%
Re-development of existing building or tenant space within
the West University Commercial District from and to a use
generally found in a shopping center
100%
Residential or mixed-use development fronts on a key
corridor
15%
Development is located within one of five nodes 10%
Transit Proximity (only one applies)
Residential or mixed-use development is within ¼ mile of an
adopted LTD Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Route
10%
Residential or mixed-use development is within ½ mile of an
adopted Frequent Transit Network (FTN) Route
5%
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) (only applicable to developments qualifying
under at least one of the above criteria)
Development has a signed transportation demand
management (TDM) agreement with the City
10%
SecondaryAccessory Dwelling Unit (SDU) 50100%
1 Single-family detached and duplex housing are not eligible for compact development
adjustments. See the Methodology for specific requirements for each adjustment.
2 A mixed-use development is a development that includes a combination of commercial
and certain residential uses, as defined in Appendix A.
3Adjustments are subject to annual caps. See General Methodology section 7.3 and section
4.4.4, above.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Appendix F
Local SDC System Formulas
and
General Fee Schedule
City of Eugene
System Development Charge Methodologies
Appendix F
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Local System Formulas & General Fee
Schedule
1.0 Local System Formulas, Calculation Details, and Rates
1.1 General Rate Setting, Cost of Service Formula
1.2 Transportation System Cost and Rates
1.2.1 Transportation System Cost of Service
General Formula
Calculation
Initial cost per trip calculations at the time of the Transportation System
Development Charge Methodology adoption (shown in the box below) employ a
cost per trip calculation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number (or
dollar) and was based upon 2014 project costs.
SDC Eligible Costs
——————————
Impact Measurement
= SDC per Unit of Service
Cost Basis / Growth Trips = Cost per Trip
Cost per Trip Calculation Using Original Cost Basis Amounts in Tables B-2
and B-3, Appendix B, Based upon 2014 Project Costs
Reimbursement:
$7,675,471 / 40,972 = $187 per Trip
Improvement:
$113,721,290 / 40,972 = $2,776 per Trip
Total Allocated Cost per Trip =
$187 + $2,776 = $2,963 per Trip
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
As part of the adoption of the Transportation System Development Charge
Methodology in 2018, the calculated “total allocated cost per trip” shown in the box
above was adjusted for inflation using the 20-city national average construction
cost index (CCI), as published by Engineering News-Record (ENR), to reflect then
current day costs at the time of adoption. This adjusted amount, as shown in the
box below, was rounded to the nearest whole number (or dollar) and was included
in Section 2.0 of this Appendix F.
Subsequent adjustments to the cost per trip (i.e., fee changes adopted per Section
2.4 of the General Methodology) shall round to the nearest hundredth (or penny).
See Section 2.0 of this Appendix F for current rates.
1.2.2 Transportation SDC Rates
Except when the City Engineer has approved an applicant’s election to use the
Alternate Trip Generation Calculation method or an alternative pass-by
adjustment, the City Engineer shall apply rates included in the Transportation Trip
Rates table, Table B-9, located below. Descriptions for the land use categories
included in Table B-9 are included in Appendix A and are based upon ITE land use
categories.
Inflationary Adjustment to 2014 Calculations, Prior to Methodology
Adoption
2014 Cost per Trip X (1 + Increase in ENR CCI (Between Dec 2014 and April
2018) = Current Cost per Trip
Increase in ENR CCI (Between Dec 2014 and April 2018) = 10.42%
$2,963 X (1.1042) = $3,272 Cost per Trip
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Table B-9 -- Transportation Trip Rates
Eugene
Trans Use
Code
Description Unit of Measure Trip
Rate
%
Pass-by
Adjusted Trip
Rate
820 SHOPPING CENTER PER TSFGLA 3.71 34%2.45
823 FACTORY OUTLET CENTER PER TGSF 2.29 0%2.29
826 SPECIALTY RETAIL CENTER & OTHER PER TSFGLA 2.71 34%1.79
841 AUTOMOBILE SALES PER TGSF 2.62 0%2.62
843 AUTOMOBILE PARTS SALES PER TGSF 5.98 43%3.41
848 TIRE STORE PER TGSF 4.15 28%2.99
850 SUPERMARKET PER TGSF 9.48 36%6.07
851 CONVENIENCE MARKET (open 24 hours)PER TGSF 52.41 51%25.68
852 CONVENIENCE MARKET (open ~ 15-16 hours)PER TGSF 34.57 63%12.79
854 DISCOUNT SUPERMARKET PER TGSF 8.34 21%6.59
857 DISCOUNT CLUB PER TGSF 4.18 37%2.63
862 HOME IMPROVEMENT SUPERSTORE PER TGSF 2.33 42%1.35
863 ELECTRONICS SUPERSTORE PER TGSF 4.50 40%2.70
864 TOY/CHILDREN'S SUPERSTORE PER TGSF 4.99 34%3.29
875 DEPARTMENT STORE PER TGSF 1.87 0%1.87
876 APPAREL STORE PER TGSF 3.83 0%3.83
879 ARTS AND CRAFTS STORE PER TGSF 6.21 34%4.10
880 PHARMACY/DRUGSTORE W/OUT DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW PER TGSF 8.40 53%3.95
881 PHARMACY/DRUGSTORE WITH DRIVE-THROUGH WINDOW PER TGSF 9.91 49%5.05
890 FURNITURE STORE PER TGSF 0.45 53%0.21
911 WALK-IN BANK PER TGSF 12.13 0%12.13
912 DRIVE-IN BANK PER TGSF 24.30 26%17.98
918 HAIR SALON PER TGSF 1.45 0%1.45
931 QUALITY RESTAURANT PER TGSF 7.49 44%4.19
932 HIGHER TURNOVER REST, INCL TAVERN/BAR (925 & 932)PER TGSF 9.85 43%5.61
934 FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH OR WITHOUT DRIVE-THROUGH PER TGSF 32.65 50%16.33
937 COFFEE/DONUT SHOP / COFFEE ESTABLISHMENT (936, 937, & 938)PER TGSF 42.80 89%4.71
941 QUICK LUBRICATION VEHICLE STOP PER SERV.POS.5.19 0%5.19
942 AUTO CARE CENTER PER TSFGLA 3.11 0%3.11
944 GASOLINE/SERVICE STATION PER VEH.FUEL.POS.13.87 42%8.04
945 GASOLINE/SERVICE STATION W/CONVENIENCE MARKET (W/ OR W/OUT CAR WASH)PER VEH.FUEL.POS.13.51 56%5.94
947 SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH PER STALL 5.54 0%5.54
948 AUTOMATED CAR WASH PER TGSF 12.12 0%12.12
950 TRUCK STOP PER TGSF 13.63 0%13.63
NOTE: TGSF = Thousand Gross Square Feet
TSFGLA = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leasable Area
DU = Dwelling Unit
SERV. POS. = Service Position
VEH. FUEL. POS. = Vehicle Fueling Position
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
City of Eugene SDC Methodologies Fee Schedule & Formulas, Page F-6
{00294420;4 }
1.3 Wastewater System Cost of Service:
1.3.1 Local Wastewater System Cost of Service
Determination of Flow Estimation Formula for Residential Development
Graphical comparison of water consumption per month to square foot of living area results in a
slope of 0.951 gallons per month per square foot and a base flow per dwelling unit of 3,946 gallons
per month.
Gallons per Month
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
370 1195 1977 2780 4000
0 816 1585 2382 3280
Total A re a Li ving Sp ace
Projected
Sampled Actual Data
Base Flow
Intercept,
Gal. / Month
3,946
Slope
0.951 gal/mo/sq ft
Gal. / Day (GPD)
--30 day month--
132
Days per Month
30
Cost per Gal/Day $3.5030 Slope / 30 Days 0.032
Base Charge =
GPD x Cost per Gal.
$462.40
Cost per Gal/Day
$3.5030
Cost per sq ft =
Daily usage factor x Cost per
Gal.
$0.1121
The implementation of this rate structure results in each new single family dwelling being
charged a local wastewater SDC that is comprised of a base rate of $462.40 plus an
additional charge of $0.1121 applied to the total proposed living space area of the
dwelling.
Reimbursement:
Formulas for Non-Residential Development
Calculations for Non-Residential Development
1.4 Stormwater System Cost of Service:
General Formulas
$17,073,927
——————
=
$0.1096 per sq. ft.
155,770,560 sq. ft. impervious surface area
Non-Assessable System Valuation
(Value of Existing + Value of Planned)
Build-out Capacity (mgd)
= Cost per Unit of Capacity
Per Unit of Capacity X Flow per PFU for Development Type X
Number of PFUs for Development = SDC for Development
$156.249662 + $15.324095M ------------------------------------
49.0 mgd = $3.5030 per Gallon per Day
$3.5030 X Gallon per PFU (varies by development type) X
Number of PFUs = SDC for Development
SDC eligible costs
——————————
Total additional impervious
surface area using capacity (sq. ft)
= Unit cost per square foot of
impervious surface area
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
Improvement:
General System Capacity
LID System Capacity
General System Capacity Total Unit Cost per Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface Area =
(Reimbursement + Improvement) = $0.1096 + $0.1207 = $0.2303
Total Unit Cost per Sq. Ft. Impervious Surface Area with LID System Capacity =
(Reimbursement + Improvement + LID) = $0.1096 +$0.1207 +$1.8309 = $2.0612
$18,800,662
—————— = $0.1207 per sq. ft.
155,770,560 sq. ft. impervious surface area
$8,513,629
——————
=
$1.8309 per sq. ft.
4,650,000 sq. ft. impervious surface area
1.5 Parks System Cost of Service:
General Formulas:
Residential – costs and equivalent population densities per dwelling unit
type vary
Nonresidential – costs and equivalent population densities per
development category type vary
Cost per Person
OR
X Persons per TGSF
=
Cost per TGSF
Cost per Person X Persons per Room = Cost per Room
TGSF = Thousand Gross Square Feet of floor area
Calculations: Vary; see Table 17
Cost per person X Persons per Dwelling Unit Type = Cost per DU
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.0 Adopted SDC Fee Schedule: Current Rates
2.1 Transportation System:
Cost per trip
$3,272.00
2.2 Local Wastewater System:
Residential dwelling unit base fee
$462.40
Residential dwelling unit total living area multiplication factor
Non-Residential rate per gal/day per land use type per PFU
$0.1121
Varies
2.3 Regional (MWMC) Wastewater System:
Residential dwelling unit
$1709.67
Non-Residential rate per gal/day per land use type per FEU Varies
2.4 Stormwater System:
General System Capacity
Small Residential (building footprint < 1,000 sq. ft.) $414.54
Medium Residential (building footprint > 1,000 sq.ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $667.87
Small Duplex (unit building footprints < 1,000 sq. ft.) $829.08
Medium Duplex (unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $1,335.74
Manufactured Home Park
Per space (assumes 1,684 sq. ft. per space) $387.83
plus
Per sq. ft. actual impervious surface area, addt’l common areas $0.2303
All Other Development
Per sq.ft. actual impervious surface area and/or equivalent $0.2303
LID System Capacity
Small Residential (building footprint < 1,000 sq. ft.) $3,710.16
Medium Residential (building footprint > 1,000 sq.ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $5,977.48
Small Duplex (unit building footprints < 1,000 sq. ft.) $7,420.32
Medium Duplex (unit building footprints >1,000 sq. ft. and < 3,000 sq. ft.) $11,954.96
Manufactured Home Park
Per space (assumes 1,684 sq. ft. per space) $3,471.06
plus
Per sq. ft. actual impervious surface area, addt’l common areas $2.0612
All Other Development
Per sq.ft. actual impervious surface area and/or equivalent $2.0612
Continuation of Current Rates on next page.
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4
2.5 Parks System:
Residential (per Dwelling Unit)
Single Family $4,246.00
Duplex/Town Home/Mobile Home/Accessory DU $3,442.00
Multifamily $2,686.00
Nonresidential (unit varies – see Table 19 for Class description)
Class A (per Room) $1,697.00
Class B (per thousand gross square feet or TGSF) $1,134.00
Class C (per TGSF) $694.00
Class D (per TGSF) $413.00
Class E (per TGSF) $167.00
2.6 AdministrationCharges:
City of Eugene if based on percentage 9.0%
City of Eugene if based on flat rate $80.00
2.7 Appeal Fee: City of Eugene per SDC appeal $100.00
November 26, 2018, Meeting - Item 4