HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrd. 20607COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 20607
COUNCIL BILL 5190
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
CHARGE METHODOLOGY; AMENDING SECTIONS 7.710, 7.715,
7.720, 7.725, 7.730 AND 7.735 OF THE EUGENE CODE, 1971;
AND ADDING SECTION 7.732 TO THAT CODE.
ADOPTED: November 26, 2018
SIGNED: November 30, 2018
PASSED: 6
REJECTED:
OPPOSED: 1
ABSENT: Evans
EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2019
Eugene
ORDINANCE NO. 20607
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE
METHODOLOGY; AMENDING SECTIONS 7.710, 7.716, 7.720, 7.726,
7.730 AND 7.736 OF THE EUGENE CODE, 1971; AND ADDING
SECTION 7.732 TO THAT CODE.
I1:1=11115d11 WKS] 0XRc]4011=11111Z6] *IW NDIM 101FAM76]I110IT111.
Section 1. Section 7.710(3) and 7.710(5) of the Eugene Code, 1971, are amended
to provide as follows:
7.710 SDC - Methodology.
(1)
The methodology used to establish or modify a reimbursement fee shall
consider the cost of then -existing facilities, prior contributions by then -
existing users, gifts or grants from federal or state governments or
private persons, the value of unused capacity available to future system
users, rate -making principles employed to finance publicly owned
capital improvements, and other relevant factors identified by the
council. The methodology shall promote the objective that future
systems users shall contribute an equitable share of the cost of then -
existing facilities.
(2)
The methodology used to establish or modify the public improvement
charge shall consider the cost of projected capital improvements
needed to increase the capacity of the systems to which the fee is
related and shall provide for a credit against the improvement fee for
the construction of any qualified public improvement.
(3)
The methodology may also provide for a credit, reduction, or
adjustment as authorized in sections 7.730 to 7.732.
(4)
Except when authorized in the methodology as provided in subsection
7.710(3), the fees required by this code which are assessed or
collected as part of a local improvement district or a charge in lieu of a
local improvement district assessment, or the cost of complying with
requirements or conditions imposed by a land use decision are
separate from and in addition to the systems development charge and
shall not be used as a credit against such charge. Nothing in this
subsection shall prevent the collection of a system development charge
in connection with a local improvement assessment or charge in lieu of
a local improvement district assessment.
(6)
The methodologies for establishing the systems development charge
shall be established by resolution of the council and may be adopted
and amended concurrent with the establishment or revision of the
systems development charge. An amendment to a methodology that
Ordinance - Page 1 of 8
changes the amount of a reimbursement fee or an improvement fee
based on the periodic application of an adopted specific cost index or
on a change in the costs of materials, labor or real property applied to
projects or project capacity on a project list adopted pursuant to section
7.715(2) may be adopted by the city manager by administrative order
pursuant to section 2.020 of this code.
Section 2. Section 7.715(2) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.715 SDC - Compliance With State Law.
(1) The revenues received from the systems development charges shall be
budgeted and expended as provided by state law. The accounting of
such revenues and expenditures required by state law shall be included
in the city's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report required by ORS
chapter 294.
(2) The capital improvement plan required by state law as the basis for
expending systems development charge revenues for capital
improvements shall be the Eugene Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
and the comprehensive plan as adopted by the council (Plan), the
Transportation SDC Project Plan, other city facilities plans that may
include SDC -eligible capital projects, or the capital improvement plan
adopted by another governmental body which was used by the city
manager in establishing the methodology for the systems development
charge, provided such capital improvement plan is consistent with the
CIP, the Transportation SDC Project Plan, and the Plan.
Section 3. Section 7.720(6) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended and a new
section 7.720(7) is added to provide as follows:
7.720 SDC - Collection of Charae
(1) After adoption of the applicable methodology, a systems development
charge is payable upon issuance of:
(a) A building permit;
(b) A development permit for development not requiring the issuance
of a building permit; or
(c) A permit to connect to the water, wastewater sewer or stormwater
management facilities or in anticipation of the issuance of such a
permit at the time of levying a local improvement district
assessment for wastewater sewer or stormwater management
facility.
(2) If development is commenced without an appropriate permit or
Ordinance - Page 2 of 8
connection is made to the water system, wastewater sewer system or
stormwater management facility without an appropriate permit, the
systems development charge is immediately payable upon the earliest
date that a permit was required.
(3) The city manager or the manager's designee shall collect the systems
development charges from the permittee. The city manager or the
manager's designee shall not issue any permit or allow connection
described in subsection 7.720(1) until the charge has been paid in full
or until provision for installment payments has been made within the
limits prescribed in subsection 7.190(2).
(4) Except as provided in this subsection, the obligation to pay the unpaid
systems development charge and interest thereon shall be secured by
a lien against the property upon which development is to occur. Such
liens shall arise upon issuance of the permit requiring the system
development charge and shall be entered on the city's lien docket and
the debt secured thereby may be collected in the same manner as
allowed by law for street improvement assessment liens. In lieu of such
lien, upon application of the permittee the obligation to pay the unpaid
systems development charge and interest thereon may be secured by
property, bond, deposits, letter of credit or other security acceptable to
the city manager or the manager's designee.
(6) When the obligation to pay the unpaid systems development charge is
imposed at the time of levying a local improvement district assessment
for wastewater sewer or of paying an equivalent assessment for
wastewater sewer and the obligation is secured by a lien against the
real property being developed, the person paying the systems
development charge in installments may apply for deferral of the
payments as provided in section 7.195.
(6) Except as provided in this subsection, SDC fees paid are not
refundable and, in the case of an agreement to pay SDCs in
installments, the terms of the agreement may not be modified. A partial
refund of SDC fees will be made or a modification of an installment
agreement will be allowed when an active development permit is
canceled or expires without being used, a change of design of an active
development permit is approved that results in a less intense use of the
property, or property previously developed as a manufactured home
park is partitioned and redeveloped. No portion of the administrative
charge will be refunded, and additional review fees may be imposed to
cover the cost of calculating and processing the partial refund.
(7) The SDC methodology adopted under section 7.710 of this code may
require that a proposed development be reviewed by the city in order to
determine whether the proposed development will result in an increase
in the usage of any capital improvement or will create the need for
additional capital improvements. Development that will have such an
impact will be charged SDCs and associated administrative charges. If
this review determines that the development will not have such an
Ordinance - Page 3 of 8
impact, then only a review fee may be imposed for this review.
Section 4. Section 7.725 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.725 SDC — Exemptions.
(1) Except for the systems development charge attributable to the
wastewater sewer system and the stormwater management facilities, all
development which existed or for which the city had received a
completed building permit application on or before June 30, 1991, or for
which a building permit was issued before that date, is exempt from the
systems development charge imposed in section 7.705.
(2) Housing for low-income persons is exempt from the systems
development charge imposed in section 7.705, subject to the following
limitations:
(a) Commencing with the 1998 fiscal year, and continuing each fiscal
year thereafter, the city manager or designee may waive a base
amount totaling $115,000 annually of system development
charges for housing for low-income persons.
(b) Each fiscal year that there is a change in the rates for the system
development charges for residential development, the base
amount for that fiscal year shall be adjusted in an amount
proportionate to that change.
(c) If any portion of the authorized base amount remains unallocated
at the end of a fiscal year, that portion shall be added to the
authorized base amount for the next fiscal year.
(d) In the event the property for which an exemption is granted
ceases to be utilized for housing for low-income persons or is sold
or transferred for use other than housing for low-income persons
within five years from the date the certificate of exemption is
recorded, the person to whom the exemption was granted shall be
required to pay to the city the amount of the exempted systems
development charges, plus interest at the statutory rate for
interest on a judgment from the date the certificate was recorded.
(e) Upon issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the city shall record
the certificate of exemption documenting the date and amount of
the exemption with the Lane County Recorder's office.
(f) A transfer from an owner to whom an exemption was granted to
the initial lessee under a lease to purchase agreement shall not
be deemed a transfer of ownership for purposes of this
subsection.
(g) The exemption authorized herein does not include an exemption
from the regional wastewater systems development charge.
(h) For purposes of this subsection (2), "low-income persons" means:
Ordinance - Page 4 of 8
1. With regard to rental housing, persons with an income at or
below 60 percent of the area median income as determined
by the State Housing Council based on information from the
United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development; and
2. With regard to home ownership housing and lease to
purchase home ownership housing, persons with an income
at or below 80 percent of the area median income as
determined by the State Housing Council based on
information from the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development.
Section 5. Section 7.730(3) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
7.730 SDC - Credits.
(1)
As used in this section and in the definition of "Qualified public
improvements" in section 7.010, the word "contiguous" means: in a
public way which abuts.
(2)
When development occurs which does not change the use of a building
in its entirety and which must pay a system development charge under
section 7.705 of this chapter, the system development charge for the
existing use(s) shall be calculated and if it is less than the system
development charge for the proposed use(s), the difference shall be the
system development charge. If the change in use results in the system
development charge for the proposed use being less than the system
development charge for the existing use, no system development
charge shall be required; however, no reimbursement or credit shall be
given and an administrative charge shall be imposed.
(3)
When development occurs that demolishes an entire building or will
change the use(s) of a building in its entirety and which must pay a
system development charge under section 7.705 and/or an
administrative charge per the SDC methodology adopted under section
7.710 of this chapter, the system development charge for the previous
most intense verifiable use per system (i.e. parks, stormwater,
transportation, wastewater) shall be calculated and if it is less than the
system development charge for the proposed use, the difference shall
be the system development charge. If the change in use results in the
system development charge for the proposed use being less than the
system development charge for the previous most intense verifiable use
per system, no system development charge shall be required for that
system; however, no reimbursement or credit shall be given and an
administrative charge shall be imposed.
(4)
A credit shall be given for the cost of a qualified public improvement
Ordinance - Page 5 of 8
associated with a development. The credit provided for by this
subsection shall apply only to the improvement fee imposed for the type
of improvement being constructed, and shall not exceed the
improvement fee even if the cost of the capital improvement exceeds
the applicable improvement fee. Credit may be granted only for the
cost of that portion of such improvement that exceeds the government
unit's minimum standard facility size or the capacity needed to serve
the particular development project or property.
(6) The methodology may provide for a credit against the public
improvement fee, the reimbursement fee, or both, for a capital
improvement constructed as part of the development that reduces the
development's demand upon existing capital improvements or the need
for future capital improvements or that would otherwise have to be
constructed at city expense under the then -existing council policies.
(6) Except to the extent that a capital improvement for which a credit is
given is part of the phasing of a larger project and that the credit
received against the systems development charge is greater than the
charge for the phase where the capital improvement is constructed,
credit shall not be transferable from one development to another.
(7) Credit shall not be transferable from one type of capital improvement to
another.
Section 6. Section 7.732 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is added to provide as follows:
7.732 SDC — Impact Reductions and Compact Development Adiustments.
(1) The methodologies may include provisions pertaining to a reduction in a
development's calculated SDC for one or more of the city's capital
systems if the development incorporates private physical improvements
or programs that will permanently reduce the impact the development
has upon that capital system.
(2) The methodologies may include provisions pertaining to an adjustment
to a development's calculated transportation SDC for specific types of
compact development.
(3) The impact reductions and compact development adjustments
approved for reduction or adjustment of the calculated SDC for one type
of capital system shall not be transferable to reduce or adjust the SDC
for another type of capital system.
Section 7. Section 7.735(2) of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide as
follows:
Ordinance - Page 6 of 8
7.735 SDC -Appeal Procedures
(1) As used in this section, "working day" means a day when the general
offices of the city are open to transact business with the public.
(2) A person aggrieved by a decision required or permitted to be made by
the city manager or the manager's designee under sections 7.700 to
7.732 or a person challenging the propriety of an expenditure of
systems development charge revenues may appeal the decision or the
expenditure by filing with the public works staff at the city's permit
center a written request for consideration by the hearings officer and by
paying the fee for an appeal established under section 2.020 of this
code. Such appeal shall describe with particularity the decision or the
expenditure which the person appeals and shall comply with subsection
(4) of this section.
(3) An appeal of an expenditure must be filed within two years of the date
of alleged improper expenditure. Appeals of any other decision must
be filed within 15 working days of the date of the decision.
(4) The appeal shall state:
(a) The name and address of the appellant;
(b) The nature of the determination being appealed;
(c) The reason the determination is incorrect; and
(d) What the correct determination of the appeal should be or how the
correct determination should be derived.
An appellant who fails to file such a statement within the time permitted
waives his/her objections, and his/her appeal shall be dismissed.
(5) Unless the appellant and the city agree to a longer period, an appeal
shall be heard by a hearings officer within 15 working days of the
receipt of the notice of intent to appeal. At least ten working days prior
to the hearing, the city shall mail notice of the time and location thereof
to the appellant.
(6) The hearings officer shall hear and determine the appeal on the basis
of the appellant's written statement and any additional evidence he/she
deems appropriate. At the hearing the appellant may present testimony
and oral argument personally or by counsel. The rules of evidence as
used by courts of law do not apply.
(7) The appellant shall carry the burden of proving that the determination
being appealed is incorrect and what the correct determination should
be or how a correct determination should be derived.
(8) The hearings officer shall issue a written decision within ten working
days after the hearing date and the decision of the hearings officer shall
be final.
Section 8. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the consent of the City
Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained herein,
Ordinance - Page 7 of 8
Section 8. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the consent of the City
Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained herein,
or in other provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971, to the provisions added, amended or
repealed herein.
Section 9. This Ordinance shall become effective on January 1, 2019.
Passed by the City Council this
261h day of November, 2018
City Recorder
Ordinance - Page 8 of 8
Approved by the Mayor this
day of? 'r- ' , , 2018
/Mayor