Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutClimate Action Plan 2.0 PresentationCLIMATE ACTION PLAN 2.0 UPDATE-JANUARY 30, 2019 City Manager’s Office *Fort Collins, Providence and Knoxville are included as cities of comparable size to Eugene. Seattle and Portland are also included to provide a regional perspective. **Sector-based accounting is used in these charts except where otherwise noted. Eugene is one of a handful of communities in the nation to publish a consumption-based inventory and the only community that staff is aware of to base its climate goals on this accounting methodology. *Fort Collins, Providence and Knoxville are included as cities of comparable size to Eugene. Seattle and Portland are also included to provide a regional perspective. **Sector-based accounting is used in these charts except where otherwise noted. Eugene is one of a handful of communities in the nation to publish a consumption-based inventory and the only community that staff is aware of to base its climate goals on this accounting methodology. City Community GHG Reduction Goals Seattle, WA 58% by 2030 100% by 2050 Eugene* 350 ppm by 2100** 67% by 2030** 93% by 2050 99.9% by 2100 Portland, OR 40% by 2030 80% by 2050 Fort Collins, CO 80% by 2030 100% by 2050 Providence, RI 100% by 2050 Knoxville, TN 20% by 2020 *Eugene is the only City represented to base goals on a consumption-based accounting methodology. Sector Based Buckets Sector vs Consumption CRO Related Projects Moving Ahead Love Food Not Waste PeaceHealth Rides Fix It Fairs Advanced Metering (EWEB) Updated TSP LTD Electrification of bus system SCORE and rEV-UP Sustainable Procurement Policy Responsible Events Safe Routes to School Mayors Bold Steps Integrate CRO + CIP Envision Eugene LED Streetlights Banking RFP Process Natural Gas discussions Addressing the Gap Projected GAP GAP Strategy 2030 Goal-Sector 450,000 MTCO2e Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide equivalent Annually Sector Based GAP DESCRIPTION SCALE (MTCO2E- ANNUALLY) COST Transportation Fuels 1. More aggressive TSP goals 30,000-70,000 2. Electrify passenger vehicles/light trucks/commercial fleets rapidly. Save $9,000 over life of car a. 25,000 beyond TSP 110,000 b. 50,000 beyond TSP 220,000 c. 75,000 beyond TSP 330,000 3. Increase use of low-carbon fuels Included in TSP 4. Advocate for more aggressive Federal vehicle fuel economy standards Included in TSP DESCRIPTION SCALE (MTCO2E- ANNUALLY) COST Energy Used in Buildings 1. Electrify heating systems through regulation of natural gas 130,000 2. Additional natural gas actions a. Reduce carbon intensity of gas 80,000 b. Offset gas emissions (50- 100%) 160,000-310,000 Increase of $50- $20,000 yr c. Regulate Infrastructure 20,000-40,000 3. Home Energy Score Policy 20,000 Other 4. Oregon Cap and Trade Legislation 430,000 5. Reduce or offset refrigerant loss 80,000 $18/yr per household 6. Improve landfill gas capture 10,000-20,000 Sector Based GAP Figure 4 : C onsumption-based emissons and existing policy forecast. Consumption Based GAP GAP Strategy 2030 Goal- Consumption 2,000,000 MTCO2e Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide equivalent Annually Consumption Based GAP DESCRIPTION SCALE COST 1. International action to implement Paris Accord at 25% by 2030 270,000 2. Reduce average square footage of new single-family detached homes. 20,000 3. Move to plant based diets 10,000-170,000 4. Reduce all possible food waste. 50,000 5. Eugene optimizes the waste system toward zero waste. 90,000 6. Reduce carbon intensity of concrete products. Household Action It’s going to take everyone to reach our goals. Phase Two of CAP2.0 is focused on Individual Action. Communications: Developing a Community Wide Campaign based on CAP2.0 research CAP2.0 Next Steps Questions and Discussion Emissions from Energy Used In Buildings -Forecast 2017 Energy Used in Building-related GHGs reductions for specific actions. Emissions from Transportation Fuels -Forecast 2017 Transportation Fuels GHGs and emissions reductions for planned action.