HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 2-11-19 MeetingFebruary 11, 2019, Meeting
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
February 11, 2019
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
Meeting of February 11, 2019;
Her Honor Mayor Lucy Vinis Presiding
Councilors Betty Taylor, President Emily Semple, Vice President Greg Evans Chris Pryor Mike Clark Claire Syrett Jennifer Yeh Alan Zelenka
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
1. PUBLIC FORUM
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of City Council Minutes
B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda
C. Approval of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (301
Dibblee Lane, Eugene, Oregon; Property Identified as Assessor’s Map
17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 02700)(City File: Kempf, Rodney and Gloria; A 18-
10)
February 11, 2019, Meeting
The Eugene City Council welcomes your interest in these agenda items. This meeting location is wheelchair-accessible. For the hearing impaired, an interpreter can be provided with 48 hours' notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation will also be provided with 48 hours' notice. To arrange for these services, contact the receptionist at 541-682-5010. City Council meetings are telecast live on Metro Television, Comcast channel 21, and rebroadcast later in the week. El consejo de la Ciudad de Eugene agradece su interés en estos asuntos de la agenda. El lugar de la reunión tiene acceso para sillas de ruedas. Se puede proveer a un intérprete para las personas con discapacidad auditiva si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. También se puede proveer interpretación para español si avisa con 48 horas de anticipación. Para reservar estos servicios llame al 541-682-5010. Las reuniones del consejo de la ciudad se transmiten en vivo por Metro Television, Canal 21 de Comcast y son retransmitidas durante la semana.
For more information, contact the Council Coordinator at 541-682-5010, or visit us online at www.eugene-or.gov.
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2A
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Approval of City Council Minutes Meeting Date: February 11, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 2A Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This is a routine item to approve City Council minutes.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to approve the minutes for the January 14, 16 and 22 Work Sessions as well as the January 14 meeting.
ATTACHMENTS A. January 14, 2019, Work Session B. January 14, 2019, Meeting C. January 16, 2019, Work Session D. January 22, 2019, Work Session
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
January 14, 2019
5:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor, Greg Evans Mayor Vinis opened the January 14, 2019, Work Session of the Eugene City Council.
1.Committee Reports and Items of Interest
•Councilor Semple – Requested that the shades be raised during daytime council meetings;asked that council minutes reflect who says what during council meetings; voiced concernthat no progress was being made on downtown day center.
•Councilor Taylor – agreed that opening the window shades would create a moretransparent and welcoming environment; reported constituent frustration about theparking fee increases; supported the elimination of parking meters; asked about the City’sauthority to regulate puppy mills; conveyed comments received about poor air quality andwhether automobile emission inspections could be considered; raised the issue ofpedestrian and traffic safety, particularly along E. Amazon.
•Councilor Yeh – thanked Officer Kidd and Officer Hubbard for hosting her on a ride-alongand sharing their perspectives and experiences.
•Councilor Pryor – reported on the Housing Policy Board meeting and its discussions aboutthe Housing Tools & Strategies initiative, the Technical Assistance Collaborative report, andthe 2019 Legislative Agenda and what the impacts of the government shutdown have beenon HUD activities and projects; recounted a meeting with the City’s legislative delegationcentered around housing, including zoning and tenant protections.
•Councilor Syrett - announced that she had been chosen as Chair of the Lane AreaCommission on Transportation; shared a request made to the Mayor and City Manager toconsider the renaming of the Washington-Jefferson Park in honor of Edwin Smith, who wasinstrumental in securing the land under the I-105 on and off ramps for use as a park, and toinitiate the process for renaming.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Syrett, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to request that the Mayor create an ad hoc committee in accordance with council policy on naming of public facilities, to consider the request to rename Washington Jefferson Park in honor of Edwin Smith. PASSED 6:1, Councilor Semple opposed, Councilor Zelenka absent.
•Mayor Vinis - reminded everyone about the protocols and process laid out by State statutethat will occur in response to a fatal police shooting at Cascade Middle School.
(Councilor Zelenka arrived at 5:46 p.m.)
•Councilor Clark – announced that in response to overwhelming constituent input from allwards and significant safety concerns, he was proposing a motion for council consideration;
ATTACHMENT A
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to direct the City Manager to prepare an ordinance that mirrors Springfield Municipal Code Section 6.112, Unlawful Transfer on Vehicular Portion of the Right-of-Way, and schedule a public hearing. PASSED 6:2, councilors Syrett and Zelenka opposed.
2. WORK SESSION: Housing Tools and Strategies – Construction Excise Tax Planning and Development Director Denny Braud introduced the item and Council Discussion
• Support expressed for the CET in general, but not the inclusion of the systems development charge component; keep it simple and reconsider both the upper and lower limits imposed.
• The proposed CET will have a general negative effect on the General Fund; intent of tax is to lower the cost of building affordable housing.
• Questions asked about how much money will be lost from SDC resources and the General Fund.
• The proposed process will be cumbersome for a couple of years and then simplify; the proposed CET has strong, diverse support and can be adjusted after two years if needed.
• It is important to establish an affordable housing fund and the proposal provides a means to this end; the legislation allows for some flexibility to use the funds for mortgage/rental assistance and emergency repairs.
• The CET makes sense as a good start to the development of more subsidized housing.
• More information requested about the track record of the CET in other communities like Bend, Oregon.
• The CET is a long-term strategy; the first two years will be challenging but can review its effectiveness and make adjustments.
• Only the feasibility of the proposed CET was analyzed by the committee, not the economic impacts; important to have conversation about what types of housing are most needed.
MOTION: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to direct the City Manager to prepare a draft ordinance for council consideration and schedule a Public Hearing to create a Construction Excise Tax to support an Affordable Housing Fund that includes the provisions described in Option 1.
MOTION TO AMEND: Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Syrett, moved to amend the motion add a new Option 1.iii – “1.0 percent tax rate effective July 1, 2021,” and renumber the rest of Option 1 accordingly.
• With this action, council will be creating a financing mechanism for subsidized housing that will fall short on its intended purpose and necessitate a real estate transfer tax.
• Many Oregon communities have already established a one percent tax; confident it will move the dial on the amount of affordable housing developed and the affordability of housing.
• The amount of funds generated through a MUPTE incentive is more than would be generated with a CET.
VOTE ON MOTION TO AMEND: PASSED 5:3, councilors Clark, Taylor and Evans opposed.
VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED: PASSED 6:2, councilors Clark and Taylor opposed.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
3. WORK SESSION: Eugene Public Library – Year 2 Levy Report Library Recreation and Cultural Services Director Renee Grube and Customer Experience Manager LaVena Nohrenberg reviewed the progress made in implementing the programs and services enabled by levy funds. Council Discussion
• Questions asked about what will happen when the levy has expired; conversation should start soon about alternative strategies for funding going forward.
• Expanded services at Sheldon and Bethel branch libraries are particularly appreciated. The meeting adjourned at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beth Forrest City Recorder Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
January 14, 2019
7:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor, Mayor Vinis opened the January 14, 2019, meeting of the Eugene City Council.
1.ACTION: ELECTION OF CITY COUNCIL OFFICERS FOR 2019
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to elect Betty Taylor as President of the City Council for 2019. PASSED 8:0.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to elect Emily Semple as Vice President of the City Council for 2019. PASSED 8:0.
2.PUBLIC FORUM1.Abraham Luedtke – spoke in support of a single-use plastics and polystyrene ban.2.John Ammondson - spoke in support of a single-use plastics and polystyrene ban.3.Terry McDonald – spoke in support of the River Road landbank site development.4.Todd Boyle – spoke in support of addressing the housing needs of the lowest-income residents.5.Adam Kishel – shared concerns about the lack of information on the recent Eugene Police shooting.6.Eric Jackson – supported exploring alternatives to the current homeless camp models.7.Aura – shared her experience in the Camp 99 homeless camp and her desired way of life.8.Kaarin Knudson – conveyed Better Housing Together’s support for the Construction Excise Tax.9.Carmel Snyder – spoke on behalf of AARP in support of efforts to address affordable housing.10.Robin Bloomgarden – spoke against single-use plastics and the proliferation of 5G technology.11.Cindy Allen – opposed the proliferation of 5G in low-density neighborhoods.12.Karyn Kaplan – spoke in support of a single-use plastics ban.13.Donna Riddle – urged the council to provide more assistance to the homeless.14.Cindy Matherly – spoke in support of a single-us plastics ban.15.Brennen Matherly – spoke in support of a single-use plastics ban.16.Bill O’Brien – conveyed frustration with City’s involvement in the demolition of Hayward Field.17.Joshua Caraco – supported more parking for seniors and those with disabilities, not businesses.18.Nicholas Knight – shared his thoughts about the recent Eugene Police shooting.19.Lon Otterby – supported a ban on polystyrene products.20.Deb McGee – supported a ban on single-use plastics.21.Scott Smith – supported a proposal to enact a law that would curb panhandling on busy streets.22.Sara Burant – supported a ban on single-use plastics and Styrofoam.23.Betzi Hitz – spoke in support of a ban on single-use plastics.24.Amanda Ligon – spoke about the need for police racial bias training.25.Loretta Huston – opposed the proliferation of 5G technology.26.Victor Odlivak – spoke in support of efforts to stop the proliferation of 5G.27.Dag Arneson – spoke about the recent Eugene Police shooting.28.Michael Gannon – spoke about pedestrian safety, the police shooting, the CET, and the plastics ban.29.Roman Anderson – supported the implementation of a reasonable CET program.
ATTACHMENT B
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
30. Debbie Jensen – expressed frustration about a personal situation with vehicle towing. 31. D’Arcy Martin – spoke in support of efforts to curb or ban panhandling. 32. Theresa Skotchdopole – supported protecting the area around the River Road housing site. 33. Jen Hornaday – opposed the proposed swale adjacent to the River Road housing site. 34. René Nelson – spoke in support of efforts to stop panhandling. 35. Steve Ochs – spoke in support of the proposed affordable housing funding package. 36. Alyssa Gilbert – spoke in support of a polystyrene ban and other waste issues. 37. Liv Meyer – spoke in support of a polystyrene ban and other environmental initiatives. 38. Stefan Strek – shared his solutions to the issue of homelessness. 39. Rachel McDaid – supported efforts to protect the area around the River Road housing site. 40. Melody Delorme – asked council to adopt a panhandling ordinance similar to Springfield’s. 41. Stephen Carson – opposed the presence of armed guards at public schools. 42. Monique Hall – opposed the proliferation of 5G smart meters. 43. Paul von der Meh – spoke in support of the Homes for Good Project at MLK Commons. Council Discussion
• Pedestrian safety is an issue in this community; unfortunate that there is no driver education requirement for getting a license.
• There is multi-step process for reviewing deadly force incidents; important to not draw conclusions until the facts are known.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of City Council Minutes • November 28, 2018, Work Session • December 10, 2018, Work Session • December 10, 2018, Meeting • December 12, 2018, Work Session B. Approval of Tentative Working Agenda C. Adoption of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (Assessor’s Map 17-03-33-12 Tax Lot 200 — located at 435 Lindley Lane) (City File: Sebring; A 18-9)
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar. PASSED 8:0.
4. ACTION: Approval of Resources for Housing Affordable to Low-Income Persons
Housing Finance Analyst Ellen Meyi-Galloway and Housing Opportunities Team Manager Stephanie Jennings introduced the topic and presented information about the approval process.
Council Discussion
• Working to lower the costs associated with development will result in more units of affordable housing.
• Concerns expressed about the ecological impacts of the proposed development on River Road; support continued efforts to mitigate the impacts on neighboring properties and residents.
• Outreach to community was thorough; project enjoys general support.
• Support expressed for less regimented approach to the development of affordable housing; look at more innovative alternatives and opportunities for collaboration.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to award the property at 1505-1525 River Road and approve use of $725,000 in HOME funds for the construction of River Road Affordable Housing as proposed by St. Vincent de Paul.
PASSED 8:0
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to approve use of $749,534 in HOME funds and $150,466 in Low-Income Housing funds for the construction of the Commons on MLK as proposed by Homes for Good Housing Agency. PASSED 8:0
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beth Forrest City Recorder Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
M I N U T E S
Eugene City Council
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
January 16, 2019
12:00 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Jennifer Yeh, Alan Zelenka, Mike Clark. Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor. Greg Evans
Councilors Absent: Claire Syrett Mayor Vinis opened the January 16, 2019, Work Session of the Eugene City Council.
1.WORK SESSION: Single-Use Containers and UtensilsSolid Waste Analyst Michael Wisth presented information about single-use plastics, theirimpacts on the environment, and potential strategies to reduce or eliminate their use.Council Discussion
•Councilor Semple – supported the proposed ban and said the time is right to take action onthis issue; supported moving the issue to a public hearing and considering a ban that goesfurther than those enacted in test case cities.
•Councilor Clark – expressed frustration that the only option being presented is to vote yesor no; more helpful to outline all pros and cons of those votes; legitimate concerns raised onboth sides of the issue, including sanitary and equity/cost considerations.
•Councilor Zelenka – asked questions about limiting access to plastics at the retail level; dataanalysis about the life cycle of materials; effects of polystyrene ban in Portland.
•Councilor Evans – asked questions about and urged consideration of emerging technologiesthat could replace current materials; best practices in other communities; and organic-based alternatives.
•Councilor Pryor – thanked staff for the good, myth-busting presentation; said it’s importantto act but to consider when and at what scale; expressed concern about the undue negativeconsequence on lower-income population who may rely on the use of banned materials.
•Councilor Taylor – agreed that it’s important to consider the unexpected consequences of aban; noted that not all cardboards are compostable; supported ban on polystyrene.
•Mayor Vinis – stated that the proposed ban represents a request for behavior change; plasticis cheap to manufacture and that factor should be considered when comparing to otherproducts; it will be helpful to recommend alternative when presenting the proposed ban.
•Councilor Zelenka – said that charging for alternative materials adds value to them and helpschange behavior; encouraged addressing food waste to reduce greenhouse gas emissions;noted that most compostable materials must be processed at a commercial facility.
•Councilor Taylor – expressed concern that if restaurants charge for to-go containers,customers will decline to take their leftovers, resulting in more food waste.
•Councilor Clark – said legitimate issues and questions were being raised; encouragedcouncil to return for more robust conversation about the potential impacts of their decisionto ban single-use plastics.
•Councilor Semple – supported providing free bus passes, the use of paper bags and reusablecontainers, and continued efforts on the food waste issue to address climate goals; said apublic hearing will provide the council with good information.
ATTACHMENT C
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
MOTION: Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to direct the City Manager to prepare and schedule a public hearing on an ordinance that prohibits caterers, restaurants, grocery stores, and non-profit food servers from 1) providing plastic straws, except on request; 2) serving or packaging food and beverages in products made of polystyrene or other single-use plastic products, including containers and wrappers, plates, bowls, cups and lids, stirrers and utensils, and condiment packages. Council Discussion
• Councilor Clark – offered a friendly amendment to substitute an additional work session for a public hearing to give staff the opportunity to present information about the pros and cons of potential impacts of a ban.
• Councilor Zelenka – agreed that he was not yet sure about the specifics of a proposed ban and hoped to learn more about the issue to help develop ordinance language; encouraged the public to provide testimony at Public Forums.
• Councilor Evans – suggested looking at practices that create barriers for reusable materials (e.g. sporting events) and then identify strategies for removing those barriers.
• Councilor Pryor – supported continuing the council discussion of alternatives at another work session.
• Councilor Semple – accepted the suggestion to eliminate the specific list of plastic products; supported making a big statement with the council’s proposed legislation.
• Councilor Zelenka – noted that aluminum is a good alternative to plastic as it’s recyclable and readily available.
RESTATED MOTION AND VOTE (including friendly amendment): Councilor Semple, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to direct the City Manager to prepare and schedule a work session on an ordinance that prohibits caterers, restaurants, grocery stores, and non-profit food servers from 1) providing plastic straws, except on request; and 2) serving or packaging food and beverages in products made of polystyrene or other single-use plastic products. PASSED 7:0
2. WORK SESSION: Home Energy Score Waste Prevention and Green Building Analyst Deveron Musgrave, Sustainability Manager Chelsea Clinton, and Climate Recovery Ordinance Analyst Mark Nystrom presented information about the Home Energy Score program and next steps for implementation in Eugene. Council Discussion
• Councilor Evans – asked about the specific emission difference between buildings heated with natural gas and those heated with electricity; that information will be important to convey to the public.
• Councilor Clark – urged consideration of systemic capacity if more homes are converted from gas to electric; important to ensure that council is having its discussion of the issues with accurate data.
• Councilor Zelenka – reported that the natural gas provider is moving quickly towards renewable natural gas; the Home Energy Score is much-needed information for potential home-buyers and renters; allows choices based on information that has significant bottom-line impacts.
• Councilor Taylor – supported moving forward with Home Energy Score program; consider which model would be most effective in Eugene.
• Councilor Semple – agreed that program is valuable and will contribute to City’s climate recovery goals; Home Energy Score will provide valuable information to buyers and renters and incentives to owners to improve energy efficiency.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
• Councilor Zelenka – said Portland’s experience implementing the program provides good lessons for Eugene; costs of program are paid for by the consumer – minimal resources required from City.
• Councilor Evans – asked questions about how renewal natural gas work and what the net effect is on lowering greenhouse gas emissions.
• Mayor Vinis – appreciated comments about the equity component of the issue and the potential for the program to result in better quality housing. The meeting adjourned at 1:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beth Forrest City Recorder Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
M I N U T E S
Joint Meeting of the
Eugene City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners
Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
January 22, 2019
5:30 p.m.
Councilors Present: Emily Semple, Betty Taylor, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor, Mike Clark
Commissioners Present: Jay Bozievich, Pat Farr, Pete Sorenson, Joe Berney, Heather Buch Mayor Vinis and Commissioner Sorenson opened the January 22, 2019, Joint Meeting of the Eugene City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners.
1.WORK SESSION: Homeless Services Systems Analysis ReportCity Manager Jon Ruiz and County Administrator Steve Mokrohisky provided introductoryremarks and turned the presentation over to Gina Schaak, Elizabeth Stewart, and DouglasTetrault, staff from the Technical Assistance Collaborative to provide the final report.Discussion
•Councilor Clark – said the TAC recommendation won’t solve the issues Eugene is facing;single people living alone is a significant population not addressed in the strategies;consider requiring single people to live in shared housing.
•Councilor Syrett – expressed appreciation for the level of detail in the final report; these arereasonable recommendations that will point the community towards its goal; supportedproposed motions, noting they will require changes to systems currently in place.
•Commissioner Bozievich – said the recommendation to add 40 new Full Time Equivalentpositions is a huge commitment; asked if a data model is available to test the inputassumptions and conclusions.
•Councilor Zelenka – said the report offers a new approach and ideas and an opportunity toget on a glide path to success; requested additional information about operating costs forthe navigation center, the tenancy support concept, and budget gaps.
•Councilor Pryor – noted that most of the items on the list of recommendation have beenconsidered before but the report compiled and integrated them into a system; encouragedmoving from coordination to cooperation.
•Commissioner Berney – said it is hard to contain the passion, knowing the pain anduncertainty of this crisis situation; raised the issue of homeless children and asked how thecommunity can reconcile those statistics against a proposal that targets a completelydifferent population; if the issues facing homeless families with children aren’t addressed,the community will see increases in addictions, criminal behavior and poor health.
•Councilor Semple – encouraged by proposed process which should help other, sub-populations of homeless; asked whether pursuing recommendations was realistic andeconomically feasible; asked if implementation would result in a decrease in the percentageof homelessness or in the actual number of homeless people.
•Councilor Taylor – asked about the availability of publicly supported facilities for peopleother than the proposed low-barrier shelter; important to consider those who experiencesudden homelessness due to inability to pay medical or utility bills.
ATTACHMENT D
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
• Commissioner Farr – commended the program outlined in the report, noting how daunting implementation will be.
• Commissioner Buch – cautioned the group about the price tag of implementation.
• Councilor Clark – asked if there will be any rules at a low-barrier shelter; asked about the percentage of homeless who are unwilling to follow rules and whether a goal of functional zero is possible if this group is included in the shelter strategies.
• Commissioner Sorenson – said the next step in the process must be to engage in conversation about where the money for implementation will come from.
• Councilor Syrett – noted that public dollars are currently underutilized because opportunities for collaboration and cooperation aren’t being maximized; suggested that not following the recommendations will cost the community more money in the long term.
• Commissioner Farr – stated that not having all of the resources and plans needed at present shouldn’t stop efforts to pursue the steps that are immediately within reach.
• Councilor Zelenka – said that it will take an estimated $3-4 million annually for ongoing program costs, but the results will be dramatic, with huge benefits to the whole community.
• Councilor Pryor – urged the group to directly confront cost issues through coordination and cooperation.
• Commissioner Berney – supported exploring a systemic way to collect more resources; while the proposal is an institution-based model, look at community-based models as well.
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to approve the Technical Assistance Collaborative Report. PASSED 7:0
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to direct the City Manager to work with the County Administrator to establish by May 1, 2019, a framework and plan for implementing the recommendations in the TAC report. PASSED 7:0
MOTION AND VOTE: Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Semple, moved to establish a steering committee to provide feedback during development of the implementation plan, with the steering committee comprised of: two elected officials from each jurisdiction; the Lane County Administrator and the Eugene City Manager; and, two representatives from the Poverty and Homelessness Board.
PASSED 7:0
• Councilor Clark – asked about Springfield’s involvement in efforts to address homelessness.
• Commissioner Berney – explained that Springfield’s focus is on children and families experiencing homelessness; their perspective would bring a lot to the conversation.
• Councilor Syrett – noted that Springfield is represented on the Poverty and Homeless Board; they are fully engaged in the discussion.
• Councilor Taylor – asked if it would be possible to redirect marijuana tax money toward efforts to implement the TAC recommendations. The meeting adjourned at 1:44 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Beth Forrest City Recorder
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
Link to the webcast of this City Council meeting: here.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2A
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2B
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Approval of Tentative Working Agenda Meeting Date: February 11, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 2B Department: City Manager’s Office Staff Contact: Beth Forrest
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882
ISSUE STATEMENT This is a routine item to approve City Council Tentative Working Agenda.
BACKGROUND On July 31, 2000, the City Council held a process session and discussed the Operating Agreements. Section 2, notes in part that “The City Manager shall recommend monthly to the council which items should be placed on the council agenda. This recommendation shall be placed on the consent calendar at the regular City Council meetings (regular meetings are those meetings held on the second and fourth Monday of each month in the Council Chamber). If the recommendation contained in the consent calendar is approved, the items shall be brought before the council on a future agenda. If there are concerns about an item, the item may be pulled from the consent calendar at the request of any councilor or the Mayor. A vote shall occur to determine if the item should be included as future council business.” Scheduling of this item is in accordance with the Council Operating Agreements.
RELATED CITY POLICIES There are no policy issues related to this item.
COUNCIL OPTIONS The council may choose to approve, amend or not approve the tentative agenda.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager has no recommendation on this item.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to approve the items on the Tentative Working Agenda.
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2B
ATTACHMENTS A. Tentative Working Agenda
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: bforrest@eugene-or.gov
Work Session Action Public Hearing Public Forum Consent Calendar
Committee Reports/Items of Interest Ceremonial Matters Pledge of Allegiance
Updated January 31, 2019Meeting Location: Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue, unless otherwise noted
February 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
11‐Feb Monday 5:30 pm Committee Reports and Items of InterestJoint Meeting with EWEB (Work Session) 90 mins Ethan Nelson, CS
7:30 pm Public Forum Resolution Annexing Land at 301 Dibblee Lane (Kempf, Rodney and Gloria; A 18‐10) (Consent Calendar) Nick Gioello, PDD
Expected absences for 2/11: none 13‐Feb Wednesday 12 pm Community Safety Revenue Update (Work Session) 90 mins Kristie Hammitt, CS
Expected absences for 2/13: none
19‐Feb Tuesday
5:30 pm Joint Meeting w/LTD Board on MovingAhead (Work Session) Downtown Riverfront Update (Work Session)
60 mins
30 mins
Chris Henry, PW
Michael Kinnison,PDD
7:30 pm Ordinance Revising Nuisance Codes (Public Hearing) Ordinance Providing for Withdrawal of Annexed Properties from Special Districts (Public Hearing) Ordinance on Construction Excise Tax (Public Hearing) Ordinance on Unlawful Transfer on Vehicular Portion of the Right‐ of‐Way (Public Hearing)
Rachelle Nicholas, PDD
Jenessa Dragovich, PDD
Stephanie Jennings, PDD
Lt. Jen Bills, EPD
Expected absences for 2/19: none
ATTACHMENT A
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
2
20‐Feb Wednesday 12 pm Accessory Dwelling Units (Work Session) 90 mins Alissa Hansen, PDD
Expected absences for 2/20: none 20‐Feb Wednesday 5:30 pm Budget Committee Meeting on CIP
Twylla Miller, CS
Expected Absences: none Note: Budget Committee Meeting Added, B/T Room 23‐Feb Saturday 9 am City Council Annual Goals Workshop
Becky DeWitt, CS
Expected absences for 2/23: none 25‐Feb
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest Police Commission, Sustainability Commission, Human Rights Commission Updates (Work Session)
90 mins
Jeremy Cleversey, EPD Chelsea Clinton, CS Jen Van Der Haeghen, CS
7:30 pm
Public Forum Resolution Annexing Land at 3510 Walton Lane (A‐18‐8) (Consent Calendar) Resolution Annexing Land at 503 Sunnyside Drive (A 18‐11) (Consent Calendar) Ord. on Withdrawal of Annexed Properties from Special Districts (Consent Calendar)
Rodney Bohner, PDD Rodney Bohner, PDD Jenessa Dragovich, PDD
Expected absences for 2/25: Vinis, Syrett 27‐Feb
Wednesday
12 pm
Ordinance on Unlawful Transfer on Vehicular Portion of the Right‐ of‐Way (Work Session & Possible Action) Rest Stop Program (Update)
45 mins 45 mins
Lt. Jen Bills, EPD Jason Dedrick, CS
Expected absences for 2/27: Vinis, Syrett
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
3
March 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact 11‐Mar
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest River Road‐Santa Clara Neighborhood Plan (Work Session) Single‐Use Plastics (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Eric Brown, PDD Michael Wisth, PDD 7:30 pm Ceremonial Matters – Eugene Police Accreditation Public Forum Capital Improvement Program (Public Hearing and Action) Ord. Revising Nuisance Codes (Action)
Mike Streepey, CS Rachelle Nicholas, PDD
Expected absences for 3/11: Taylor, Evans 13‐Mar
Wednesday
12 pm
Housing Tools & Strategies Follow‐Up (Work Session) Renter Protections (Work Session)
60 mins 30 mins
Michael Kinnison, PDD Stephanie Jennings, PDD
Expected absences for 3/13: Taylor, Evans
Council Break: March 14 – April 8
April 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact
8‐Apr Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest Bond Measure to Fix Streets/2019 Pavement Management Report (Work Session) Riverfront Steamplant Proposal (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Matt Rodrigues, PW Amanda D’Souza, PDD 7:30 pm Public Forum Ord. on Construction Excise Tax (Action)
Stephanie Jennings, PDD
Expected absences for 4/8: none 10‐Apr Wednesday 12 pm Vision Zero Update (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Matt Rodrigues, PW
Expected absences for 4/10: none February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
4
15‐Apr
Monday
5:30 pm Highway 99/Bethel Urban Renewal District (Work Session) 90 mins Michael Kinnison, PDD
7:30 pm Ordinance on Presiding Judge (Public Hearing) Keri Beraldo, CS
Expected absences for 4/15: none 17‐Apr
Wednesday
12 pm Presiding Judge (Work Session) Inclusionary Zoning (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Keri Beraldo, CS Stephanie Jennings, PDD
Expected absences for 4/17: none 22‐Apr
Monday
5:30 pm Boards and Commissions Interviews 90 mins 7:30 pm Public Forum
Expected absences for 4/22: 24‐Apr Wednesday 12 pm Boards and Commissions Interviews 90 mins
Expected absences for 4/24:
May 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact 8‐May Wednesday 12 pm Commercial Setbacks (Work Session) Zone of Benefit/Reimbursement District (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Denny Braud, PDD Matt Rodrigues, PW
Expected absences for 5/8: none 13‐May
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest Homeless Services Systems Analysis Report Implementation (Work Session)
90 mins
7:30 pm Public Forum MWMC Budget Ratification (Consent Calendar)
John Huberd, PW
Expected absences for 5/13: none 15‐May Wednesday 12 pm Urban 3 Mapping Value (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
60 mins 30 mins
Chad Cramer, PDD
Expected absences for 5/15: none
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
5
20‐May
Monday
5:30 pm Clear & Objective Housing Approval Criteria (Work Session)
90 mins Jenessa Dragovich, PDD
7:30 pm TBD (Public Hearing)
Expected absences for 5/20: none 22‐May Wednesday 12 pm Data Collection Policy/Protection of Individuals and Groups (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Jen Van Der Haeghen, Becky DeWitt, CS
Expected absences for 5/22: none 28‐May
Tuesday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
7:30 pm Public Forum
Expected absences for 5/28: none Location: Bascom‐Tykeson Room, Library 29‐May Wednesday 12 pm TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Expected absences for 5/29: none
June 2019
Date Day Time Title Length Dept. Contact 10‐Jun
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
7:30 pm Public Forum
Expected absences for 6/10: none 12‐Jun Wednesday 12 pm Urban Reserves Update/Next Steps (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
60 mins 30 mins
Rebecca Gershow, PDD
Expected absences for 6/12: none
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
6
17‐Jun
Monday
5:30 pm TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
7:30 pm TBD (Public Hearing)
Expected absences for 6/17: none 19‐Jun Wednesday 12 pm TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Expected absences for 6/19: none 24‐Jun
Monday
5:30 pm
Committee Reports and Items of Interest TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
7:30 pm
Public Forum Supplemental Budget 2 (Public Hearing and Action) URA Supplemental Budget 2 (Public Hearing and Action) FY20 Proposed Budget (Public Hearing and Action) URA – FY20 Proposed Budget (Public Hearing and Action)
Jamie Garner, CS Jamie Garner, CS Jamie Garner, CS Jamie Garner, CS
Expected absences for 6/24: none 26‐Jun Wednesday 12 pm TBD (Work Session) TBD (Work Session)
45 mins 45 mins
Expected absences for 6/26: none
Work Session Action Public Hearing Public Forum Consent Calendar
Committee Reports/Items of Interest Ceremonial Matters Pledge of Allegiance
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
7
Approved Work Session Polls to be Scheduled Councilor Date Approved
Hwy 99/Bethel Urban Renewal District – scheduled 4/15/19 Evans 11/9/17
Data Collection Policy/Protection of Individuals and Groups – scheduled 5/22/19
Single‐Use Plastics Ban – scheduled 2/27/19
Potential Regulation of Natural Gas in Eugene – scheduled 1/30/19
Revisit City Code Regarding Alley Access Rules
Syrett
Semple
Semple
Semple
7/19/18
10/04/18
10/11/18
10/11/18
Follow‐Up Work Sessions to be Scheduled
TAC Report ($1 Million Shelter) – scheduled May 13
Commercial Setbacks – scheduled 5/8/19
Inclusionary Zoning – scheduled 4/17/19
SB1051/ADUs – scheduled 2/20/19
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2B
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2C
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Approval of a Resolution Annexing Land to the City of Eugene (301 Dibblee Lane, Eugene, Oregon; Property Identified as Assessor’s Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 02700) (City File: Kempf, Rodney and Gloria; A 18-10) Meeting Date: February 11, 2019 Agenda Item Number: 2C Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Nicholas R. Gioello
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5453
ISSUE STATEMENT This item is a request to annex approximately 8.42 acres (366,775 square feet) of land located at 301 Dibblee Lane. No public right-of-way is proposed for annexation as part of this request. A vicinity map is provided as Attachment A. The property is zoned AG Agricultural with /WR Water Resources Conservation and /UL Urbanizable Land overlays. Both the Metro Plan and the applicable refinement plan, the River Road – Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan, designate the subject property for Low Density Residential use. The property is located within the Urban Growth Boundary, and is contiguous on the west and south property boundaries to other properties within the City limits. Annexation will allow for future development consistent with the property’s land use designation and the Eugene Code. For this property to further develop as residential property, a zone change to R-1 Low-Density Residential will be necessary. Specific plans for future development of the site are not included as part of this annexation application.
BACKGROUND To encourage compact urban growth and sequential development within Eugene’s UGB, the Metro Plan provides that ultimately all land within the UGB will be annexed into the City and provided with a minimum level of urban services. Approval of annexation requests are based on the criteria at Eugene Code 9.7825 which requires that (1) the land proposed to be annexed is within the City’s UGB and is contiguous to the City limits or separated from City limits only by a right-of-way or water body; (2) the proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refinement plans; and (3) the proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimal level of key urban facilities and services can be provided in an orderly, efficient and timely manner. Findings demonstrating that the annexation request is consistent with these approval criteria are included as Exhibit C to the attached draft resolution (Attachment B). To provide nearby property owners and residents an opportunity to review and comment on this annexation request, public notice was provided to all owners and occupants of property within
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2C
500 feet of the subject property and the affected neighborhood association (Santa Clara Community Organization), consistent with Eugene Code requirements. No testimony has been received to date regarding the proposed annexation of this property. Referral comments were provided by affected agencies including City of Eugene Public Works, Lane County Transportation Planning and Eugene Water & Electric Board. These referral comments confirm there are no concerns with the proposed annexation and the property can be provided with the minimum level of key urban services consistent with the approval criteria. Additional background information regarding this request, including relevant application materials, is included for reference as Attachment C. A full copy of all materials in the record is also available at the Permit and Information Center located at 99 West 10th Avenue.
RELATED CITY POLICIES The Metro Plan contains the policies that are related to this annexation request. The applicable refinement plan is the River Road – Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan. The policies applicable to this request are addressed in the Planning Director’s findings and recommendation (Exhibit C to Attachment B).
COUNCIL OPTIONS City Council may consider the following options: 1. Adopt the draft resolution 2. Adopt the draft resolution with specific modifications as determined by the City Council 3. Deny the draft resolution 4. Defer action until after the council holds a public hearing on the proposed annexation
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager recommends that the City Council adopt the draft resolution by finding that the request complies with all applicable approval criteria, and that the annexation be approved.
SUGGESTED MOTION Move to adopt a resolution approving the proposed annexation request consistent with the applicable approval criteria.
ATTACHMENTS A. Vicinity Map B. Draft Annexation Resolution with Exhibits A through C Exhibit A: Map of Annexation Request Exhibit B: Legal Description Exhibit C: Planning Director Findings and Recommendation C. Application Materials for Annexation Request
February 11, 2019, Meeting – Item 2C
FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Nicholas R. Gioello Telephone: 541-682-5453 Staff E-Mail: ngioello@eugene-or.gov
Caution:This map is based on imprecise sourcedata, subject to change, and forgeneral reference only.
Kempf, Rodney & Gloria (A 18-10)
RIVER LOOP 1
BANTON AVE
GRIZZLY AVE
DIBBLEE LN
TA
I
T
O
S
T
EC
H
O
L
N
LAZY AVE MI
L
E
S
W
A
Y
GERALD AVE
AZALEA DR
SILVER MEADOWS DR
DA
L
E
W
O
O
D
S
T
WEDGEWOOD DR
E ANCHOR AVE
SAL
T
Y
W
A
Y
ZA
N
E
L
N
MYOAK DR
K
E
N
D
R
A
S
T
LE
N
O
X
R
D
COMMODORE ST
AD
M
I
R
A
L
S
T
PA
U
L
A
C
T
´
January 2019
Subject Property
UGB
0 500250Feet
Legend
Eugene UGB Subject Property Taxlots City Limits
Subject Property
City Limits
City Limits
UGB
^
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Resolution - Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. _____
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION ANNEXING LAND TO THE CITY OF
EUGENE (ASSESSOR’S MAP 17-04-12-20, TAX LOT 2700—LOCATED AT
301 DIBBLEE LANE).
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
A. An annexation application was submitted on November 14, 2018, by Rodney G.
Kempf and Gloria J. Kempf in accordance with the provisions of Section 9.7810 of the Eugene
Code, 1971, (“EC”) to annex property identified as Assessor’s Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 2700,
to the City of Eugene.
B. The property proposed to be annexed is depicted on the map attached as Exhibit A
to this Resolution. The legal description of the property proposed to be annexed is attached to this
Resolution as Exhibit B.
C. The City’s Planning Director has submitted a written recommendation that the
application be approved based on the criteria of EC 9.7825. The Planning Director’s Findings and
Recommendation is attached as Exhibit C.
D. On December 28, 2018, a notice containing the street address, the assessor’s map
and tax lot number for the property, a description of the land proposed to be annexed, and the
Planning Director’s preliminary recommendation was mailed to the applicant, owners and
occupants of property within 500 feet of the perimeter of the subject property, and the Santa Clara
Community Organization. The notice advised that the City Council would consider the Planning
Director’s full recommendation on the proposed annexation on February 11, 2019.
E. After considering the Planning Director’s recommendation, the City Council finds
that the application should be approved.
NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1. Based on the above findings and the Planning Director’s Findings and
Recommendation which are attached as Exhibit C and are adopted in support of this Resolution, it
is ordered that the land identified as Assessor’s Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 2700, which is depicted
on the map attached as Exhibit A, and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit B, is
annexed to the City of Eugene.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Resolution - Page 2 of 2
Section 2. This Resolution is effective immediately upon its passage by the City Council.
The annexation and the automatic rezoning of the land pursuant to EC 9.7820(3) from AG
Agricultural with /UL Urbanizable Land and /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlays to AG
Agricultural with /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay shall become effective in
accordance with State law.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the ____ day of February, 2019.
______________________________________
City Recorder
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
Legal Description for the Annexation of the Kempf Property
to the City of Eugene
NW 1/4 of SECTION 12, T17S, R4W, W.M.
Lane County Assessor's Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 2700
A parcel of land situated in the Northwest One Quarter of Section 12, Township 17 South, Range 4 West
of the Willamette Meridian, in Lane County, Oregon, said parcel being that property described in Bargain
and Sale Deed recorded June 18, 2015, Reception No. 2015-028358, Lane County Deeds and Records,
and being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of that property described in Deed recorded June 18, 2015, Reception
No. 2015-028358, Lane County Deeds and Records, said Point of Beginning being West, 2829.05 feet
record = 2829.98 feet) and South, 1303.70 feet (record = 1303.25 feet) and South 89°45'40" East,
1033.56 feet and South 0°04'20" West, 613.04 feet (record = 612.66 feet) from the Northeast corner of
the L. Poindexter Donation Land Claim No. 52, Township 17 South, Range 4 West of the Willamette
Meridian; from the Point of Beginning run thence South 88°55'34'' East, 722.59 feet to an iron pipe;
thence North 2°34'00" West, 143.43 feet to the Westerly line of THIRD ADDITION TO RIVERSIDE
VISTA, as platted and recorded in Book 44, Page 24, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence along
said Westerly line South 32°19'35" East, 430.34 feet; thence leaving said Westerly line run South
57°26'00" West, 194.11 feet; thence South 41°26'00" West, 66.00 feet; thence South 2°34'00" East,
66.00 feet to a point on a Boundary Agreement Line as marked on the ground and recorded in Book 200,
Page 163, Lane County Oregon Deed Records; thence along said Boundary Agreement Line North
89°42'33" West, 502.17 feet to an iron pin; thence leaving said Boundary Agreement Line and running
parallel with and 3.45 feet North of, when measured at right angles to, the North line of a certain tract of
land as determined by Circuit Court Case No. 36727, as filed in Volume 95, Page 333, Records of Lane
County Oregon, North 89°37' 14" West, 158.25 feet to a point on the East line of a certain tract conveyed
by Deed from Donald B. and Erma L. Kempf to Lane County, a political subdivision of the State of
Oregon, as recorded on Reel No. 237-D, Reception No. 46272, Lane County Oregon Deed Records;
thence along the East line of said tract North 0°04'20" East, 36.50 feet to the Northeast corner thereof,
said Northeast corner being the Southeast corner of a certain tract of land conveyed by Deed recorded on
Reel No. 221, Reception No. 14055, Lane County Oregon Deed Records; thence along the East line of
said tract North 0°04'20" East, 120.00 feet to the Northeast corner thereof, thence along the North line of
said tract, North 89°35' 15" West, 82.00 feet to the Northwest corner thereof; thence North 0°04'20"
East, 293.11 feet to the Point of Beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
Containing 8.42 acres, more or less.
Bearings and distances in the foregoing description are based on that Boundary Survey by SSW
Engineers Inc. filed June 22, 2018 as County Surveyor's File No. 44379.
REGISTERED
PROFESSIONAL
LAND SURVEYOR
OREGON
JULY 11, 2000
MICHAEL R, DAl-1RENS
60052
RENEVJAL DATE: 12.31.20/9 February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Exhibit C
Kempf, Rodney & Gloria (A 18‐10) January 2019 Page 1
Planning Director’s Findings and Recommendation
Annexation Request for Kempf, Rodney and Gloria
(City File: A 18‐10)
Application Submitted: November 14, 2018
Applicant: Kempf, Rodney & Gloria
Property Included in Annexation Request: Tax Lot 2700 of Assessor’s Map 17‐04‐12‐20
Zoning: AG Agricultural with /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay and /UL Urbanizable Land
Overlay
Location: 301 Dibblee Lane
Representative: Jason Goshert, SSW Engineers, Inc.
Lead City Staff: Nicholas Gioello, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541‐682‐5453
EVALULATION:
Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies
with Eugene Code (EC) Section 9.7805 Annexation ‐ Applicability. As such, it is subject to review and
approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through
9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and
conclusions following each.
EC 9.7825(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary and is:
(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or
(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other
body of water.
Complies Findings: The annexation area is within the City’s urban growth boundary (UGB), and is
contiguous to the City limits along the west and south property lines, consistent with
subsection (a). YES
NO
EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in
any applicable refinement plans.
Complies Findings: Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by
encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service
provisions within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth
Management section (in italic text):
Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be converted from urbanizable to urban only
through annexation to a city when it is found that:
a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the
area in an orderly and efficient manner.
b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services
and facilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be
consistent with the Metro Plan. (page II‐C‐4)
Policy 10. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the
highest priority. (page II‐C‐5).
YES
NO
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Exhibit C
Kempf, Rodney & Gloria (A 18‐10) January 2019 Page 2
Policy 15. Ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and provided with
the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. While the time
frame for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions
from urbanizable to urban. (page II‐C‐5)
The following policy from the Residential Element of the Metro Plan is also applicable:
Policy A.2 Residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned consistent with
the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing
agricultural zoning may be continued within the area between the city limits
and UGB until rezoned for urban uses.
The Metro Plan designates the property to be annexed as appropriate for low‐density
residential use. The River Road ‐ Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP) is the
adopted refinement plan for the subject property and also designates the area for
residential uses. The property is zoned AG Agricultural with /WR Water Resources
Conservation and /UL Urbanizable Land overlays. The current zoning of AG is intended to
allow agricultural uses within the UGB until land is converted to urban use. Agricultural
uses are considered interim uses until public facilities and services can be provided. In
order for this property to further develop as residential property in the future, a zone
change to R‐1 Low Density Residential will be necessary. The /UL overlay will be
automatically removed from the zoning following annexation approval.
With regard to applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, none of the general “Residential
Land Use Policies” at Section 2.2 appear to be directly applicable to the subject request.
The “Public Facilities and Services Element” policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed at
local government; however, the premise of these policies (regarding the provision of
urban services) is the assumption that property within the UGB will be annexed.
As previously discussed in this subsection, and further detailed under subsection (3)
below, the proposed annexation is consistent with Metro Plan growth management
policies and can be served by the minimum level of key urban services. The annexation
procedures beginning at EC 9.7800 are consistent with State law and therefore, as found
throughout this report, the annexation is consistent with State law.
Therefore, based on the findings above, the proposal is consistent with the applicable
policies of the Metro Plan and RR/SC UFP refinement plan.
EC 9.7825(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be provided in an
orderly, efficient, and timely manner.
Complies Findings: Consistent with this criterion, the proposed annexation will result in a
boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be
provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner as detailed below:
YES
NO
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Exhibit C
Kempf, Rodney & Gloria (A 18‐10) January 2019 Page 3
Wastewater
There is an 8‐inch public wastewater line terminating at the subject property within
Dibblee Lane. As an informational item, there is a waste water assessment for this tax
lot which will need to be paid prior to any additional development on this tax lot.
Stormwater
There is a 24 inch Public stormwater line that runs east to west through the middle of
this lot. Records show that the soils are mapped as Type B, indicating fairly good
infiltration. Testing may be required at the time of development to demonstrate
adequate percolation rates and the applicant must discharge its stormwater runoff from
impervious surfaces to an approved point of discharge and demonstrate the
downstream capacity for stormwater disposal.
Transportation
Both Dibblee Lane and Grizzly Avenue terminate along the west property boundary.
Both streets are paved, local roads owned and maintained by Lane County Public Works.
Access management and street standards will be evaluated at the time of future
development.
Comments from Lane County Transportation Planning indicate no concerns with the
proposed annexation request. Any redevelopment or new development of the property
must demonstrate compliance with the requirements of Lane Code Chapter 15. A review
for compliance with Lane County road requirements will apply at the time the property is
developed.
Solid Waste
Collection service is provided by private firms. Regional disposal sites and the Short
Mountain Landfill are operated by Lane County.
Water and Electric
EWEB Water staff state no objection to the annexation. EWEB Electric staff also state no
objection to the annexation. Water and electric services can be extended to the subject
property in accordance with EWEB policies and procedures.
Public Safety
Police protection can be extended to this site upon annexation consistent with service
provision through the City. Fire protection will be provided by the Eugene Springfield
Fire. Emergency medical services are currently provided on a regional basis by the cities
of Eugene and Springfield to central Lane County and will continue in the same manner
upon annexation.
Parks and Recreation
Parks and recreation programs are provided on a City‐wide basis. The inclusion of the
subject property in the City is sufficient evidence to demonstrate the minimum level of
this key urban service is met.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Exhibit C
Kempf, Rodney & Gloria (A 18‐10) January 2019 Page 4
Planning and Development Services
Planning and building permit services are provided for all properties located within the
urban growth boundary by the City of Eugene. The Eugene Code, Chapter 9, will provide
the required land use controls for future development of the subject property upon
annexation.
Communications
A variety of telecommunications providers offer communications services throughout
the Eugene/Springfield area.
Public Schools
The subject property is within Eugene School District 4J and is within the district
boundary of Awbrey Park Elementary School, Madison Middle School, and North Eugene
High School. As access to schools is evaluated on a district wide basis, the property’s
location within the school district is sufficient evidence to demonstrate the minimum
level of this key urban service is met.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the above findings, information submitted to date, and the criteria set forth in EC 9.7825, the
proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable approval criteria. A map and legal description
showing the area subject to annexation are included in the application file for reference. The effective
date is set in accordance with State law.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 1 of 6
ANNEXATION APPLICATION
Property Location: 301 Dibblee Lane, Eugene, OR 97404
Assessor’s Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 2700
Situated East of the Easterly termini of Dibble Lane and
Grizzly Avenue, between Dibblee Lane and River Loop 1
Owner / Applicant: Rodney G. Kempf & Gloria J. Kempf
91355 Triple Oaks Drive
Eugene, OR 97408
Applicant’s Representative: Jason Goshert
SSW Engineers Inc.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-485-8383
jasong@sswengineers.com
Surveyor: Michael R. Dahrens, PLS
SSW Engineers Inc.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 541-485-8383
miked@sswengineers.com
Current Base Zoning: AG “Agricultural”
Overlay Zone(s): /WR “Water Resources Conservation”
/UL “Urbanizable Land”
Metro Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Applicable Refinement Plan: River Road – Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan
Neighborhood: Santa Clara Community Organization
Request: Annexation to the City of Eugene
(WRITTEN STATEMENT IS ON FOLLOWING PAGES)
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 2 of 6
WRITTEN STATEMENT
This written statement describes how this annexation request is consistent with the applicable
approval criteria referenced in Section 9.7825 of the Eugene Code. Approval criteria are shown
in italics, with subsequent findings / responses shown in regular text.
9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria. The city council shall approve, modify and
approve, or deny a proposed annexation based on the application’s consistency with
the following:
(1) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city’s urban growth boundary
and is:
(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or
(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay,
lake or other body of water.
The land proposed for annexation (hereinafter referred to as the “subject property”) is located
within the City of Eugene’s urban growth boundary (UGB), the nearest segment of which is
contiguous with the southeasterly boundary of adjacent Tax Lot 2600 located to the southeast of
the subject property. The subject property is contiguous to the current city limits on portions of
two (2) of its sides. More specifically, the adjacent properties currently comprised of Tax Lots
2910, 2911, 2912, and 2917 (City-owned access restriction strip at easterly terminus of Grizzly
Avenue) immediately adjacent to the west side of the subject property were formally annexed
into the City of Eugene in 1993 (Annexation No. 93-43), and the adjacent property currently
comprised of Tax Lot 3500 immediately adjacent to the south side of the subject property was
formally annexed into the City of Eugene in 1995 (Annexation No. 95-39). Therefore, the
proposed annexation satisfies EC 9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (1) & (1)(a).
9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria. (continued)
(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro
Plan and in any applicable refinement plans.
Several policies from the Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by encouraging
compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service provisions within the
UGB, including the following policies from the Growth Management section:
Metro Plan Policy 1 states that the UGB and sequential development shall continue to be
implemented as an essential means to achieve compact urban growth, and that the provision of
all urban services shall be concentrated inside the UGB. The subject property is located within
the UGB, and the minimum level of urban services are already available to the subject property
as discussed below in response to EC 9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (3). Therefore, the
proposed annexation of the subject property is consistent with Metro Plan Policy 1.
Metro Plan Policy 8 provides for conversion of land from urbanizable to urban through
annexation when a minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided. This
policy is the subject of EC 9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (3), which is addressed in
detail below.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 3 of 6
Metro Plan Policy 10 states that annexation to the city through this normal process shall be the
highest priority. As such, the proposed annexation of the subject property is consistent with this
policy.
Metro Plan Policy 15 states that ultimately, land within the UGB shall be annexed to a city and
provided with the required minimum level of urban facilities and services. It further states that
while the timeframe for annexation may vary, annexation should occur as land transitions from
urbanizable to urban. The subject property is located within the UGB and the UL “Urbanizable
Land” overlay zone and therefore, based on this policy, should be annexed. Nearby lands in the
vicinity of the subject property have already transitioned from urbanizable to urban with the
benefit of at least the minimum level of urban facilities and services. The minimum level of
urban facilities and services are also already available to the subject property as discussed below
in response to EC 9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (3). Therefore, the proposed
annexation of the subject property is consistent with Metro Plan Policy 15.
Metro Plan Policy 16 states that Eugene and Springfield and their respective utility branches,
Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) and Springfield Utility Board (SUB), shall be the water
and electric service providers within the UGB. The proposed annexation of the subject property
is not in conflict with Metro Plan Policy 16. In fact, the subject property already receives EWEB
electric service, as well as EWEB water services via a contract agreement with the Santa Clara
Water District (SCWD).
Metro Plan Policy 17 applies to local government as opposed to the applicant, in that it concerns
dissolution of special service districts after annexation and consideration of intergovernmental
agreements with affected special service districts. The proposed annexation of the subject
property is not inconsistent with this policy.
Metro Plan Policy 19 states that annexation of territory to existing service districts within the
UGB shall occur only when immediate annexation to a city is not possible because the required
minimum level of key urban facilities and services cannot be provided in a timely manner
(within 5 years) and, except for areas that have no fire protection, affected property owners have
signed consent to annex agreements. As addressed below in response to EC 9.7825 Annexation
– Approval Criteria (3), the minimum level of key urban facilities and services are already
available to the subject property such that immediate annexation to the City is possible. Metro
Plan Policy 19 is therefore not applicable to the proposed annexation of the subject property.
Metro Plan Policy 20 states that when unincorporated territory within the UGB is provided with
any new urban service, that service shall be provided by the following method (in priority order):
a) Annexation to a city; b) Contractual annexation agreements with a city; c) Annexation to an
existing district; or d) creation of a new service district. Annexation to the City of Eugene is
being proposed to allow connection to, and/or continued utilization of existing City utilities and
urban services by the subject property consistent with this policy.
The following policy from the Metropolitan Residential Land Use and Housing Element of the
Metro Plan is also applicable:
Metro Plan Policy A.2 states that residentially designated land within the UGB should be zoned
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 4 of 6
consistent with the Metro Plan, and applicable plans and policies; however, existing agricultural
zoning may be continued within the area between the city limits and UGB until rezoned for
urban uses. The current Metro Plan land use designation applicable to the subject property is
“Low Density Residential”. The River Road – Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan (RR/SC UFP)
is the adopted refinement plan for the subject property and also designates the area for “Low
Density Residential” use. The subject property is currently zoned Agricultural (AG) with Water
Resource Conservation (/WR) and Urbanizable Land (/UL) overlay zoning. The /UL overlay
zoning will automatically be removed from the subject property following annexation approval,
however the Agricultural (AG) base zoning shall remain pursuant to Metro Plan Policy A.2, the
provisions at EC 9.7820(3), as well as Policy 2 at Section 4.2 (Urban/Agricultural Fringe Areas)
of the “Environmental Design” element of the RR/SC UFP which states that in the event of
annexation or incorporation, agricultural zoning shall be maintained on land to which it is
currently applied until the property is needed for urban levels of development.
In regards to other applicable policies of the RR/SC UFP, the subject property is not located
within any of the defined subareas thereof. Further, none of the general “Residential Land Use
Policies” at Section 2.2 are directly applicable to the proposed annexation of the subject
property. The “Public Facilities and Services” element policies of the RR/SC UFP are directed
at local government; however, the premise of these policies (regarding the provision of urban
services) is the assumption that property within the UGB will be annexed. Therefore, the RR/SC
UFP in general supports the annexation, urbanization, and provision of urban facilities and
services to properties within its boundaries.
In consideration of the above, as well as relevant portions of the statements below addressing EC
9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (3), the proposed annexation is consistent with applicable
policies in the Metro Plan and applicable refinement plans and therefore satisfies EC 9.7825
Annexation – Approval Criteria (2).
9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria. (continued)
(3) The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level
of key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, can be
provided in an orderly, efficient, and timely manner.
The Metro Plan defines the “Minimum Level” of “key urban facilities and services” as including:
“…wastewater service, stormwater service, transportation, solid waste
management, water service, fire and emergency medical services, police
protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service,
land use controls, communication facilities, and public schools.”
Wastewater Service: City of Eugene / Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission
wastewater service is available to the subject property via existing 8” public wastewater mains
located within the adjacent portions of Dibblee Lane and Grizzly Avenue.
Stormwater Service: Stormwater service is available to the subject property via an existing 24”
public stormwater line running west to east through the subject property. Current City of Eugene
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 5 of 6
stormwater management policies require that stormwater be retained on site if possible, and that
any necessary post-development run-off into the public system shall be limited to pre-
development flows. Therefore, any future development of the subject property will require on-
site stormwater management facilities complying with the requirements of the City of Eugene
Stormwater Management Manual in effect at that time. More specifically, said future facilities
will likely be comprised of on-site private stormwater collection and conveyance systems
directing run-off into approved on-site private pre-treatment and infiltration and/or detention
facilities, with any overflow directed into the above referenced existing 24” public stormwater
line, or future public stormwater infrastructure connecting thereto. Per the USDA Soil Survey of
Lane County the site is predominantly comprised of soil type 96 – Newberg Loam, with smaller
areas comprised of soil types 24 – Chapman Loam and 97 – Newberg-Urban Land Complex.
Said soil types are classified within Hydrologic Group B, which is theoretically suitable for on-
site infiltration per current City of Eugene stormwater management policies, subject to future on-
site infiltration testing to demonstrate adequate percolation rates at the time of development.
Transportation: The subject property currently takes access from Dibblee Lane and has the
potential to also be accessed via Grizzly Avenue, both of which in turn provide connectivity to
local and regional street, road and state highway networks. Public transportation is also available
via existing Lane Transit District (LTD) bus routes along nearby River Road, with the nearest
bus stops located near the intersection of River Road and River Loop 1 approximately 0.45 miles
to the west of the subject property. Therefore, with respect to transportation, the subject property
is already served by this type of “key urban facility”.
Solid Waste Management: Garbage and recycling services are available from local and
regional private firms which collect and transport solid waste to landfills managed by Lane
County, therefore the subject property is already served by this type of “key urban service”.
Water Service: Water service is already provided to the subject property by Eugene Water and
Electric Board (EWEB) under contract with the Santa Clara Water District (SCWD) via an
existing 6” water main within Grizzly Avenue, and future additional water service(s) may also be
available via an existing 6” water main within Dibblee Lane.
Fire and Emergency Medical Services: According to the Regional Land Information Database
of Lane County (RLID), fire protection is currently provided by the Santa Clara Rural Fire
Protection District and ambulance/emergency medical services are currently provided by the
Eugene Fire & Emergency Medical Services Department (West/Central District). Following
annexation, ambulance/emergency medical services will continue to be provided by Eugene Fire
& EMS, and fire protection services will either continue to be provided by the Santa Clara Rural
Fire Protection District via agreement with the City of Eugene, or will be provided directly by
Eugene Fire & EMS. Therefore, the subject property is already served by this type of “key urban
service”.
Police Protection: Following annexation, police protection will be provided by the Eugene
Police Department, which currently provides police protection to properties within the city limits
of Eugene. Therefore, the subject property can be provided with this type of “key urban
service”.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
Written Statement for Annexation SSW Job #18-7587 Page 6 of 6
City-Wide Parks and Recreation Programs: The subject property is located within the urban
growth boundary (UGB) of the City of Eugene, and is therefore included in the City of Eugene
Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Comprehensive Plan area. According to the 2017
City of Eugene “Parks, Open Space & Rec Map” the following existing and planned parks are
located within approximately one (1) mile of the subject property: Lone Oak Park, Ruby Park,
Ferndale Park, Terra Linda Park, Santa Clara Community Park, and Whitely Landing (Lane
County Park). Following annexation, recreation programs and facilities will be available to
residents of the subject property via the City of Eugene Recreation and Cultural Services
Departments (at incorporated City resident rates) and via the River Road Park and Recreation
District (at “out-of-district” rates). Therefore, with respect to city-wide parks and recreation
programs, these types of “key urban facilities and services” are available to the subject property.
Electric Service: Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) electric service is already provided
to the subject property via existing overhead electric distribution facilities within Dibblee Lane,
and future additional electric service(s) may also be available via existing underground electric
distribution facilities within Grizzly Avenue.
Land Use Controls: The subject property is currently subject to the land use controls of the
City of Eugene, and will continue to be following annexation.
Communications Facilities: A variety of communications facilities and services (e.g. phone,
cellular, data, cable TV, etc.) are available in the area, to which the owner(s) of the subject
property can subscribe/connect to as they wish. Therefore, the subject property can be served by
these types of “key urban facilities and services”.
Public Schools: The subject property is located within the Eugene 4J School District and is
currently within the district boundaries of Awbrey Park Elementary, Madison Middle School and
North Eugene High School. Therefore, the subject property is already served by these types of
“key urban facilities and services”.
In consideration of the above, the proposed annexation satisfies EC 9.7825 Annexation –
Approval Criteria (3), as well as relevant components of applicable Metro Plan policies pursuant
to EC 9.7825 Annexation – Approval Criteria (2).
Prepared by:
SSW Engineers Inc.
Jason Goshert, Project Manager
Survey & Land Use Planning Technician
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C
1 of 4
SummaryofUrbanServiceProvision
Thisformisintendedasaguidetoassistapplicantsindemonstratingthataminimumlevelof
keyurbanservicescanbeprovidedtotheareaproposedforannexation.Spaceisprovidedon
thisformforyoutoprovidedetailedinformationonserviceprovision.Pleaseaddadditional
pagesifnecessarytoprovidedetailsofservicingissuesrelatedtotheareayouareannexing.To
assistyouinprovidingthisinformation,somecontactsarelistedbelow.Forlargeordifficultto
serveproperties,youmaywishtocontactaprivatelanduseplanningconsultanttoprepare
yourapplication.
PropertyOwner(s)Name:
___________________________________________________________________
Assessor’sMapandTaxLotNumbersforPropertiesProposedforAnnexation
(Forexample:Map17Ͳ03Ͳ19Ͳ31,TaxLot100)
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
WastewaterͲͲAllnewdevelopmentmustconnecttothewastewater(sanitarysewer)system.
Iswastewaterserviceavailabletoservetheareaproposedforannexation?(Formore
information,contacttheEngineeringstaffattheCityofEugenePermitandInformationCenter
orcall541Ͳ682Ͳ8400.)
Theproperty(ies)inthisannexationrequest:
______willbeservedfromanexistinggravitywastewaterline.
Locationandsizeofexistingwastewaterline:
___________________________________________________
______willbeservedbyanextensionofanexistinggravitywastewaterline.
Wherewillawastewaterlinebeextendedfrom?Whenwillitbeextended?Bywhom?
___________________
______________________________________________________________________________
StormwaterͲͲSiteplansforallnewdevelopmentmustprovidefordrainagetoanapproved
systemconsistentwiththeComprehensiveStormwaterManagementPlan.Cityapprovalfor
stormdrainagewillberequiredaspartofthedevelopmentprocess.(Formoreinformation,
contacttheEngineeringstaffattheCityofEugenePermitandInformationCenterorcall541Ͳ
682Ͳ8400.)
Isthesitecurrentlyservedbyanapprovedstormwatersystem?
_______________________________________
RODNEY G. KEMPF and GLORIA J. KEMPF
Map 17-04-12-20, Tax Lot 2700
8" line within Dibblee Lane & 8" line within Grizzly Avenue
No, but an existing 24" public stormwater line runs west to east through the subject property.February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
2 of 4
Ifyes,
location?_______________________________________________________________________
Ifno,howwillstormwaterbehandledafterdevelopment?Ͳ
__________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Streets–Whatexistingstreetsprovideaccesstothissite.Listexistingstreetsthatprovide
accesstothissitefromRiverRoad,theNorthwestExpressway,orBeltline
Highway._____________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
WilldedicationforadditionalstreetrightͲofͲwayberequireduponfurtherdevelopmentofthis
site?
______Yes ______No ______Unknown
Willexistingstreetsbeextendedornewstreetsconstructeduponfurtherdevelopmentofthis
site?
______Yes ______No______Unknown
(Formoreinformation,contacttheCityofEugenePublicWorksstaffat(682Ͳ6004.)
Parks,Recreation,andCulturalServices
SystemsDevelopmentrevenuesgeneratedbynewdevelopmentandBallotMeasure20Ͳ30,
whichauthorizedtheissuanceof$25.3millioningeneralrevenuebonds,willhelptofundfuture
Cityparkacquisitionanddevelopmentinthisareaandthroughoutthecity.Pleaselisttheparks
andrecreationfacilitiesthatalreadyexistorareplannedinthegeneralvicinityofthe
property(ies)includedinthisannexation:
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Keyservices,definedbytheMetropolitanPlanasparksandrecreationprograms,willbe
availabletonewcityresidentsinthisareaonanequalbasiswithresidentsthroughoutthecity.
PublicSafety
PoliceservicesͲPoliceprotectioncanbeextendedtothissiteuponannexationconsistentwith
serviceprovisionthroughoutthecity.
Collection, pre-treatment, and infiltration (and/or detention if necessary) via on-site public and/or
existing 24" public stormwater line running west to east through the subject property.
private stormwater management facility(ies), with overflow directed into the above referenced
FROM RIVER ROAD: East on River Loop 1, continue East on Dibblee Lane.
FROM NORTHWEST EXPRESSWAY: East on Irving Road, North on River Road, East on River Loop 1, East on Dibblee.
FROM BELTLINE HIGHWAY: North on River Road, East on River Loop 1, continue East on Dibblee Lane.
Per the City of Eugene 2017 "Parks, Open Space & Rec Map", the following existing and planned parks
are located within approximately one mile of the subject property: Lone Oak Park, Ruby Park, Ferndale
Park, Terra Linda Park, Santa Clara Community Park, and Whitely Landing (Lane County Park).
(Re: new streets
& extension of
existing streets)
(Re: widening
of existing street
right-of-ways)
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
3 of 4
ForRiverRoad/SantaClaraareaͲ
PoliceservicesͲPoliceprotectioncanbeextendedtothissiteuponannexation
consistentwithserviceprovisionthroughoutthecity.PolicecurrentlytravelalongRiver
RoadtoprovideservicetoareasthroughouttheRiverRoadandSantaClaraarea.Infill
annexationsanddevelopmentinthisareawillincreasetheefficiencyofservicedelivery
tothisarea.
Fireandemergencyservices(Pleaseindicatewhichfiredistrictservessubjectproperty.)
_______SantaClaraͲFireprotectionservicesarecurrentlyprovidedtothe
subjectpropertybytheSantaClaraRuralFireProtectionDistrict.
_______RiverRoadͲFireandemergencyservicesͲFireprotectioniscurrently
providedtothesubjectpropertybytheRiverRoadWaterDistrictundercontract
withtheCityofEugene.Uponannexation,fireprotectionwillbeprovideddirectly
bytheCityofEugeneFire&EMSDepartment.
Emergencymedicaltransport(i.e.,ambulance)servicesarecurrentlyprovidedonaregional
basisbyEugene,Springfield,andLaneRuralFire/RescuetocentralLaneCounty,includingthe
RiverRoadandSantaClaraareas.Afterannexation,thisservicewillcontinuetobeprovidedby
thecurrentprovider.Allambulanceserviceprovidershavemutualaidagreementsandprovide
backͲupserviceintotheotherproviders’areas.
PlanningandDevelopmentServicesͲͲPlanningandbuildingpermitservicesareprovidedtothe
areaoutsidethecitylimitsbutwithintheurbangrowthboundarybytheCityofEugene.This
servicewouldcontinueafterannexation.
EWEB(EugeneWaterandElectricBoard)currentlyprovideswaterandelectricserviceinthe
EugeneareaandcanprovideservicetonewdevelopmentintheRiverRoadandSantaClara
areauponannexation.SomepropertiesinnorthernEugenereceiveelectricservicefromEPUD
(EmeraldPeople’sUtilityDistrict).SomepropertiesinsouthEugenereceiveelectricservices
fromtheLaneElectricCooperative;pleasenoteifthisisthecaseforyourproperty.Formore
informationcontactEWEB,ph.484Ͳ2411,EPUD,ph.746Ͳ1583orLaneElectricCoͲop,484Ͳ1151.
ElectricService–Whichelectriccompanywillservethissite?
___________________________________.
WaterServiceͲͲPleaseprovidethesizeandlocationofthewatermainclosesttoyour
property.__________________.
______________________________________________________________________________
__________________.
SolidWasteͲͲSolidwastecollectionserviceisprovidedbyprivatefirms.Regionaldisposalsites
andtheShortMountainLandfillareoperatedbyLaneCounty.
Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB)
EWEB Water Service (Via contract with Santa Clara Water District (SCWD))
Existing 6" water main within Dibblee Lane & existing 6" water main within Grizzly Avenue.
Fire & emergency services currently provided by Lane Rural Fire / Rescue.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
4 of 4
NaturalGasͲͲNorthwestNaturalGascanextendservicetonewdevelopmentinthisarea.
CommunicationsͲͲUSWestCommunicationsandavarietyofothertelecommunications
providersoffercommunicationsservicesthroughouttheEugene/SpringfieldArea.
February 11, 2019, Meeting - Item 2C
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
1
,
2
0
1
9
,
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
-
I
t
e
m
2
C