Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks SDC Methodology Presentation 10-9-19Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update October 9, 2019 Parks and Recreation System Plan 12,000 individuals contributed -Developing a long-range vision for the future -Being realistic about what can be achieved 2018 Bond Measure Tugman Park Berkeley Park Striker Field Park Campbell Community Center Echo Hollow Pool Amazon Running Trail Delta Ponds Loop Trail Habitat Restoration Basic SDC Formula Project Costs Supporting Growth Equivalent Population (# of new people/ visitors/employees) Cost per Population Equivalent SDC Project List $380 million 1.Parks and Recreation System Plan 30-year vision $226 million 2.Reduce by $154m in priority 3 projects $172.7 million 3.Exclude $53.3m in projects funded through bond, etc. $95.1 million 4.Remove $77.6m in project costs that don’t support growth $87.3 million 5.Apply $7.8m SDC balance available Improvement Fee Prior Investments Supporting Growth “Reimbursement Fee” 7 Existing System Value for Growth = $30 m Prior land acquisition (for future development) Developed park land (Metropolitan Parks) Basic SDC Formula Costs Supporting Growth Equivalent Population (# of new people/ visitors/employees) $2,422 per Population Equivalent $87.3 m + +30 m = $117 m 48,469 Resident Equivalents SDC Assessment - Residential $2,422 People per unit Equivalency SDC per Unit Single Family Residential Example $2,422 X 2.51 X 1= $6,077 Multifamily Residential Example $2,422 X 1.76 X 1= $4,262 OPTION: Progressive Residential Rate Structure Housing Type/ Size Persons/ household Current Rate Updated Rate Percent Change Single-family (avg)2.51 $4,246 $6,077 43% ADU 1.25 $3,442 $3,035 -12% 800 sf or less 1.25 $4,246 $3,035 -29% 801-1,500 sf 1.96 $4,246 $4,740 12% 1,501-3,000 sf 2.71 $4,246 $6,561 55% Over 3,000 sf 3.37 $4,246 $8,162 92% Mobile home 1.76 $3,442 $4,262 24% Multi-family (avg)1.76 $2,686 $4,262 59% 0 Bedrooms (studio)1.09 $2,686 $2,640 -2% 1 Bedroom 1.20 $2,686 $2, 906 8% 2 Bedrooms 1.99 $2,686 $4,819 79% 3+ Bedrooms 2.51 $2,686 $6,079 126% Oregon Cities Rate Comparison $634 $1,041 $1,745 $2,331 $2,672 $3,721 $4,246 $4,613 $5,147 $5,162 $5,374 $6,077 $6,238 $8,300 $9,534 $10,616 $11,545 $13,595 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Single Family Rate Comparison SDC Assessment - Nonresidential $2,422 People per unit Equivalency SDC per Unit Office Example (unit = 1,000 sf. ft.) $2,422 X 3.3 X 0.2= $1,599 Hotel Example (unit = room) $2,422 X 2.3 X 0.44= $2,451 Commercial Rates Development Type Units Current Rate Updated Rate Percent Change Hotel/ Motel Room $1,697 $2,451 44% Office, Eating & Drinking TGSF $1,134 $1,599 41% Industrial TGSF $694 $986 42% Retail, General Services TGSF $413 $578 40% Warehousing TGSF $167 $235 41% TGSF = Thousand Gross Square Feet City Council Priorities Affordable Housing Public Safety Climate Recovery Ordinance Livability Envision Eugene Pillars Housing Affordability Climate Change and Energy Resiliency Neighborhood Livability Natural Resources OPTION: 2-Year Phasing Plan Development Type Current Rate Year One Year Two (Full Rate) Single-family Average $4,246 $5,162 $6,077 Annual Increase 22%18% Multi-family Average $2,686 $3,474 $4,262 Annual Increase 29%23% IMPLICATION: Delaying implementation of the full rate means the revenue collected will not support the prioritized project list, pushing more projects out into Phase 3 and beyond. ASSUMPTION: Development types that see an overall rate decrease would realize the full decrease in year one. Timeline Work session #2 October •Publish draft methodology for review in November Work session #3 January •Review methodology Public Hearing January •Revise methodology if needed Work session #4 & Possible Action February