HomeMy WebLinkAbout1-13-20 Process Work Session SlidesCouncil Process Session
Eugene City Council
January 13, 2020
1
Public Forum Themes
•Purpose of Forum
•Equity & Access
•Community Member Behavior
•Length of Meeting
2
Purpose of Forum
•Current Purpose Statement
•“Members of the public may speak about any topic during the
Public Forum, except as provided below…”
•Purpose Statement Themes
•Important component of public involvement
•Purpose seems unclear to community members
•Testimony has varying degrees of utility for Council
in informing decisions
•Quantity versus quality
3
Equity & Access
•Wait times to testify are discouraging,
particularly for newcomers
•People with luxury of time and mode of
transportation can attend regularly and/or
testify early
•First-come queuing process is
problematic
•Desire to hear from new voices
4
Community Member Behavior
•Current environment is not welcoming for
all community members
•Some do not feel comfortable and choose
not to testify
•There are some safety (or perception of
safety) issues that could be addressed
•Managing behavior can be challenging
5
Length of Meeting
•Length of Public Forum can impact the
ability to address other Council business
•Positive response to 2 minute testimony
•Consistency for community members
•Suggestions about limiting:
•Number of speakers/session length
•Number of speakers per topic
•Number of PF per month
•Amount of testimony per year/per speaker
6
Public Forum in Other Cities
7
City Frequency Speaker Time Forum Time Limit
Springfield 2x/mo.3 min 20 min
Roseburg 2x/mo.6 min 30 min
Salem 2x/mo.3 min --
Portland 2x/mo.5 min 25 min
Gresham 2x/mo. 3 min --
Hillsboro 2x/mo. 3 min --
Berkeley 2x/mo.1-2 min 10 min/no limit
Boulder 2x/mo.2-3 min 45 min
Summary of Actions
•Administrative
•Post new signage with behavior expectations
•Revise Mayor’s script at beginning of forum
•Provide suggestions on effective testimony
•Prohibit handouts to Council or audience (place in
box at podium)
•Increase outreach to community about public forum
•Staff explore feasibility of convening public forum
away from Harris Hall occasionally (cost/logistics)
8
Summary of Actions
•Suggested
•Move to 2-minute time limit on testimony as a pilot
to evaluate
•Needs More Discussion
•Revise Public Forum purpose statement
•Considering randomizing order of speakers
•Consider grouping speakers by topic area
•Consider having community members sign
statement agreeing to expectations
•Consider increased security
9
Questions & Comments
10