HomeMy WebLinkAbout1-21-20 Presentation on ADUsAccessory Dwelling Units
January 21, 2020 City Council Work Session
1
Aug 2017 Senate Bill 1051 became effective
Jan 2018 Council initiated two-phase process to implement SB 1051
April 2018 Council hearing on Phase 1 ordinances (the “where” phase)
June 2018 Council adopted Phase 1 ordinances
June 2018 Phase 1 ordinances appealed to Land Use Board of Appeals
Nov 2018 LUBA remanded Phase 1 back to Council for additional work
Feb 2019 Council work session to discuss remand/provide preliminary input
May 2019 Council hearing on draft ordinance
June 2019 LUBA order regarding owner/occupancy
June 2019 HB 2001 adopted by State Legislature
Sept 2019 Council work session
Oct 2019 Council work session: direction provided to revise ordinance
Jan 1, 2020 HB 2001 provisions on owner/occupancy & parking became effective
2
Summary of Proposed Changes
•Replaces all references of
“secondary dwelling” with
“accessory dwelling”
•Clarifies that accessory
dwellings are not accessory
buildings
•Aligns the definition of
accessory dwelling with that
provided in the 2017 state law
Summary of Proposed Changes
•Adds accessory dwellings as an explicitly
permitted uses in the following zones:
o AG Agricultural
o R-2 Medium Density Residential
o R-3 Limited High-Density Residential
o R-4 High Density Residential
o S-E Elmira Road Special Area Zone
o S-HB Blair Boulevard Historic
Commercial
•Clarifies that accessory dwellings are
allowed in the S-JW Jefferson Westside
Special Area Zone and S-C Chambers
Special Area Zone but are referred to as
additional “one-family dwellings”
Rainbow Valley Design and Construction
Summary of Proposed Changes
•Applies the R-1 Low Density
Residential zone standards for
accessory dwellings in the following
zones:
o AG Agricultural
o R-2 Medium Density Residential
o R-3 Limited High-Density
Residential
o R-4 High Density Residential
o S-E Elmira Road Special Area Zone
Summary of Proposed Changes
Removes regulations that:
•Prohibit accessory dwellings on new flag lots
•Require owner/occupancy of either the accessory or primary dwelling
•Limit the maximum number of bedrooms in an accessory dwelling
•Limit the maximum number of occupants in an accessory dwelling based on the number of occupants in the primary dwelling
•Regulate dog keeping
•Require or regulate off-street parking for accessory dwellings *
Summary of Proposed Changes
Implements Council’s motion passed on
October 23, 2019 to:
•remove barriers to above-garage
accessory dwellings in the AG, R-1, R-2, R-
3, R-4 and S-E zones by adjusting the
standards for building height and interior
setback
•remove barriers to accessory dwellings
on sloped lots in the AG, R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4
and S-E zones by adjusting the standards
for building height and interior setback
Rainbow Valley Design and Construction
Above Garage Accessory Dwellings
Photos here
Accessory Dwellings on Sloped Lots
Accessory Dwelling Units
January 21, 2020
10
Current Standards
11
Above Garage
Accessory
Dwellings
Proposed Standards
12
Current Standards
13
Current Standards
14
Accessory
Dwellings on
Sloped Lots
Proposed Standards
15
16
Accessory
Dwellings on
Sloped Lots
Dormer allowances for
accessory dwellings
above-garage and on
sloped lots
17
18
19
20
Accessory
Dwellings on
Sloped Lots
21
Accessory
Dwellings on
Sloped Lots
22
Accessory
Dwellings on
Sloped Lots
23
Staff Recommendation: Retain in Land Use Code & Justify in Findings
Staff Recommendation: City Council Input Needed
24
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
Minimum Lot Size
25
Maximum Density
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
26
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
Lot Dimentisons
27
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
Parking Requirement
28
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
Alley Access Parking/Driveway
29
Options:
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Remove from Land Use Code
Building Height/Sloped Setback
30
Staff Recommendation: City Council Input Needed
31
Staff Recommendation: Remove from Land Use Code
32
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Prohibition on New Flag Lots
33
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Vehicle Use Area
34
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Owner/Occupancy Requirement
35
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Maximum Bedroom Limitation
36
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Maximum Occupancy
37
Options:
Remove from Land Use Code
Retain in Land Use Code and justify how it’s a “reasonable standard relating to
siting and design”
Dog Keeping
38
Staff Recommendation: Remove from Land Use Code
39