The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutParks SDC Presentation 2-26-20Parks & Recreation SDC Methodology Update February 26, 2020 Parks and Recreation System Plan Public Hearing Testimony Impact of fee increase on affordable housing-no fee increase for 2 years 9% administrative fee 2018 bond projects with matching SDC funds Impact of fee increase on multi-family housing Operational funding availability 2018 Bond Measure Campbell Community Center Echo Hollow Pool Striker Field Park Santa Clara Community Park Sheldon Pool Sports Complex Amazon Running Trail Delta Ponds Loop Trail Suzanne Arlie Ridgeline Trail Ferndale Park Mattie Reynolds Park West Bank Park 2018 bond projects with SDC matching funds Recommended Response: Adopt components of the proposed methodology and the proposed project list to enable bond-related projects to be eligible for SDC matching funds *Applies to all fee implementation options Impact on Multi-family Housing Recommended Response: Eliminate the category for 3+ bedroom multi-family units Provide fee adjustments to the 2+ bedroom category that vary with location *Not applicable to Status Quo option Impact on Multi-family Housing Multi-Family Size Persons/ House- hold Current Rate Proposed Rate With Fee Reduction Percent Change 0 Bedroom 1.09 $2,725 $2,640 --2% 1 Bedroom 1.2 $2,725 $2,906 -8% 2+ Bedroom 1/4mile of FTN (30% reduction) 1.99 $2,725 $4,819 $3,373 24% 2+ Bedroom ½ mile of FTN (20% reduction) 1.99 $2,725 $4,819 $3,855 41% 2+ Bedroom All other locations (10% reduction) 1.99 $2,725 $4,819 $4, 337 59% 3+ Bedroom 2.51 $2,725 $6,079 126% Progressive Residential Rate Structure Housing Type/ Size Persons/ house- hold Current Rate Proposed Rate Percent Change ADU 1.25 $3,492 $3,035 -13% 800 sf or less 1.25 $4,308 $3,035 -30% 801-1,500 sf 1.96 $4,308 $4,740 10% 1,501-3,000 sf 2.71 $4,308 $6,561 52% Over 3,000 sf 3.37 $4,308 $8,162 89% Mobile home 1.76 $3,492 $4,262 22% Multi-Family 0 Bedrooms (studio)1.09 $2,725 $2,640 -3% 1 Bedroom 1.20 $2,725 $2, 906 7% 2 Bedrooms (within ¼ mile of FTN)1.99 $2,725 $3,373 24% 2 Bedrooms (within ½ mile of FTN)1.99 $2,725 $3,855 41% 2 Bedrooms (all other areas)1.99 $2,725 $4,337 59% Oregon Cities Rate Comparison $634 $1,041 $1,616 $1,745 $2,044 $2,224 $2,331 $2,672 $3,721 $4,246 $4,613 $4,882 $5,147 $5,162 $5,374 $6,077 $6,238 $8,300 $9,534 $10,616 $11,545 $13,595 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Single Family Rate Comparison Fee Implementation Options Recommended Response: Select one of 4 options Option 1: Original Proposal PROPOSAL- Phase-in proposed fee and rate structure over 2-years ADVANTAGES- SDC matching funds for bond projects Smaller home incentives Future fee/revenue predictability Other priority 1 project funding DISADVANTAGES Not as responsive to testimony Option 2: Delayed Implementation PROPOSAL- Phase-in proposed fee and rate structure over 2-years with a 2-year delay ADVANTAGES- SDC matching funds for bond projects Future fee/revenue predictability Responsive to testimony by delaying fee increase DISADVANTAGES Smaller home incentives delayed for 2- years Other priority 1 project funding is limited Option 3: Phased Implementation PROPOSAL- Phase-in proposed fee and rate structure over 4-years ADVANTAGES- SDC matching funds for bond projects Smaller home incentives Future fee/revenue predictability DISADVANTAGES Partially responsive to testimony with longer phase-in Other priority 1 project funding is limited Option 4: Status Quo PROPOSAL- No fee increase. Review for possible increase and revised rate structure in two years. ADVANTAGES- SDC matching funds for bond projects Responsive to testimony DISADVANTAGES Smaller home incentives delayed for at least 2-years No predictability of future fee/revenue No funding for other priority 1 projects Fee Implementation Options IMPLEMENTATION OPTION SUMMARY Bond project funding Affordable housing incentives Predictability of future fees/ revenue Funding for other project list priorities Responsive- ness to testimony Option 1: Original Proposal Option 2: Delayed Implementation Option 3: Phased Implementation Option 4: Status Quo Administrative Fee Recommended Response: Reduce fee from 9% to 5% *Applies to all fee implementation options Current SDC Reductions for ADUs Fee ADU Fee (800 sq. ft) Reduction Reduction Cap Single Family (1,500 sq. ft) Transportation SDC $1,701 100% Fee Reduction $40k/yr $3,272 Parks SDC (Current) (Proposed) $3,492 $3,035 n/a n/a n/a n/a $4308 $4,740 Stormwater SDC $427 n/a n/a $688 Local Wastewater SDC $552 n/a n/a $649 Regional Wastewater SDC $1,528 14% reduction for homes ≤800 sqft $100k total, sunsets on July 1, 2020. $1780 EWEB SDC $758 66.69% reduction for ADUs n/a $2276 Next Steps Council to provide direction •February Staff to prepare ordinance & resolutions for adoption •March Council action •April Option 5: Hybrid PROPOSAL- Phase-in proposed fee and rate structure over 3-years with a 1-year delay ADVANTAGES- SDC matching funds for bond projects Future fee/revenue predictability Partially responsive to testimony by delaying fee increase DISADVANTAGES Smaller home incentives delayed for 1- year Other priority 1 project funding is limited Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 No increase 1/3 fee increase 1/3 fee increase 1/3 fee increase (full fee)