HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 19776ORDINANCE NO. ~ ~p
AN GRDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD
METRGPGLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN TG ENLARGE
THE URBAN GRGWTH BOUNDARY 4F THE CITY GF
SPRINGFIELD BY ADDING TAX LGTS 401, 40Z, 403 AND
405 QF MAP 17-0~-Z8; APPLY NEw LAND USE
DESIGNATIGNS Ta THE PROPERTY; AMENDING THE
TEXT' OF THE PLAN; AND ADOPTING A SAVINGS AND
SEVERABILITY CLAUSE.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
A. The City Council of the City of Eugene has received a praposal from the
City of Springfield Springfield Journal No. 90-11-177} far the amendment of the Eugene
Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Metro Plan} to add a 75 acre parcel of land
to the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary, to amend the land use designations of the site,
to apply Springfield zoning districts to the site, and to amend the text of the Metro Plan
to add a statement concerning water-related industrial uses.
B. This proposal comes to the City of Eugene for action pursuant to procedures
described in the Metro Plan and Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 for amendment and
refinement of the Metro Plan.
C. The Springfield Planning Commission reviewed the proposal in a public
hearing on December 12, 199, and recommended approval.
D. The Lane County Planning Commission reviewed the proposal in a public
hearing on March 19, 1991, and recommended approval to the Board of County
Commissioners of Lane County.
E. The Eugene Planning Commission reviewed the proposal in a public hearing
on April 2, 1991, and recommended approval to the City Council.
F. Evidence exists within the record indicating the praposal meets the
requirements of Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971, and the requirements of applicable
state and local law.
G. The City Councils of Eugene and Springfield and the Board of County
Commissioners of Lane County conducted a public hearing on April 29,1991, and the City
Council of the City of Eugene is now ready to take action.
Ordinance - 1
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES GRDAIN AS F~LLGWS;
Section 1. The above findings, and the lndings set forth in Exhibit C, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference are adopted.
Section Z. The Springfield Urban Growth Boundary is enlarged by addition of
property identified as Tax Lots 401, 402, 403 and 405 of Map 17-02-28, being
approximately 75 acres in area, as depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by reference.
Section 3. The Metro Plan Diagram land use designation of the property is
amended from "Sand and Gravel" to a combination of "Natural Resource," "Light-Medium
Industrial," and "Sand and Gravel," as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference.
Section 4. The following text is added as a Policy statement in Section III-B of the
Metro Plan ~"Economic Element"~:
Industrial land uses abutting the large aggregate extraction ponds north of
High Banks Road in Springfield shall demonstrate that they require the
location next to water to facilitate the manufacture or testing of products
made on-site.
Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Grdinance is far any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent
jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision,
and such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions hereof.
Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this
1~ day of May, 1991 2,~ day of May, 1991
~.
City Recorder ayor
ordinance - Z
~.
. // ! .
ATTACHMENT A
.~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
. ~ ~ ~•~,
~°r
:~•
~~
,.
~M F
F~iber~ Urchard ~ ~ . ~ .,
' ~ , • C
~ ~
«fi E
• ~ . S
ar r+wrw. ~ r.~r •w.~r ~.r~ ~r•-y w+rw~ rw.M •-.r~ ....s -w.~ w....~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ f M ~ I
a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
f
. !
~ i
. ~ ~l E
s
. pondlabandoned quarry
{
3
..
~•
• E
`N •r r
. f aStUre ~+~~i~-"
r
Boa
Biue Water B0at5 site : ~
~ f
s
• ~ I
pond ............. wwrr~ .......~...~.. .~..~•~.. r..~.~.~.~.. ~' i
.~ E
i
~`,
3
Eugene Sand b Grave#
40Z~r...••••. - - -,~,.~,~
d
P~ ~
ert C~rc~ard
.~.
'--~.~... -- ..na....a. r.. ... ~.
. `~~.M.~...+"~i
Mach~r~e ~ .
3
q43
.~.~
Pasture
. ~ ~~
l~= ,,,, ~ oo ~o~ r
I
~0'~l1 ~ a
C ~
~ ~ ~
~y ~ ' Odd Filbert Drthard
..., ~ its
. ,~
900 ~. ~ ~ ~
~h
and
e ~ ~~ ~
.l ~tS ~ 1~.,wa
N ~ ~
.. ~~
~ • Water
~' ~ 2
1 . l~ 15" Sewer •
~ZG~p ~. 30' Stnfm Qra+n ~ x
f~ ~~ ~7
~~ 4,r ~
~ ~7 ~
,r
y" ~/ 0 O
' ~ !Ig Car ~ ~' '' n
` x ~,
~~
. ~ C''+ 1 T 1"" A ~ ~ r~
ti
.,~
~.t ~
. •: ' ~• `•
«.•t
~~ ~
•~
..... .o i 2 3 ~. S~
,. ,~ ' ,'
.~
' ~.
•
• .
l ~.
•
e ~
.~ ~ ~
+~ r #AI+• N 1{ ~ ~ «•~+r war «ir ...... ~~~ ~ ~~ ~
~1'
..~ .
~r~r~
.
TT`AC
H~1~~y
TB
I
• .. ~
~, ~
,,,
~,~
`s
c ~ f
. ~ y5' {
• ~~ t
.,
• ~ i
. . ~+ i
•. j,/Ca~
• " ~ i
• ~
~ ~
~ • t
AG ; ; e
~~
,,
f
• ~ a
.
~' ~ ~
~ I~I1 f+~~ . ~~
............ :.~ t+~11'~ ' +41M a ~~
~ES4UACE {
'.•:4: ~~~ ~ • 4
. ~
~ f ~ . I
t ~ ~ ~ i
L~ t ~ ii , ~ `
~ ~ ~ ~
.~ •
1 ~ . ,
w ~
-f. ~lMI~ `1 •
~ ,, '. e
I
~ AG E
.•
. a
~. ~ ~ .u~%
.,
~•.~~ t • i
r•
• ~: ~
ti.
~~~
~ ~ ~ ~~w ~~ ~y /r~rw Irwr~ ~. . !
' ' • i ~ ~~ ~rrry rwrr~ wr~r~ *+rM~ ~rwrrr+ ~
~rr • i
~ ~ I
r , ~ ~ ~,
•... ~ Lot ~
.~;,.: t
.~• I ~
..
~;~ ~~ ~ '.
.•
w ,1 ~*~ • ' ~ ' ~
^
fly AM ~r
' Iy~~ Nir"'u g
.r
.. ~~
,.
. i
1
3
s
AGAICULTUAE ~AG~
~~ 400 ~~~
,o~]~
~ c.,
~~v r~~ ~
.. a~ ts,
t ST~~~ t~W DENS TY RCS~DENT ~ ~ ; E.
~ ~ ~f
c ~.
~Ov •~
~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~'~ ~ ~ ' ~ s
~+ : E
~ ~~i~
~ ',
ti ~•~~
~ ~'~
~,~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ p~
r~ ~
ti
rte, ~ ' ~ y ~~• ~ .. ~ tS~ r ~o p ' .
.~ ~r r14, ~ ~ ~I Q~ 20
~ _ ~ ~/ ~ •
u v Y ~ ~''~
ATTACNi'~ENT C A
FINDINGS IN SUPPQRT qF THE LAND USE DECISION
Summary Listing of Specific Findings
1. The Springfield Staff Repart and Findings Attachment D}, including Maps A-F;
2. The Findings of Fact prepared by David J. Newton, Associates Exhibits 1, Parts A and
B}, including attachments'
3. The Letter from Dr. Thomas Pringle of Emerald Wetland Consulting to Mr. Greg
Winterowd, Planning Consultant, concerning wetland values and dated February 11,
1991;
4. "Wildlife Values and Use of the 52nd Street Ponds", the last two pages of Exhibit 4}
the Goa! 5 Inventory prepared by Mr. William J. Castillo, District Wildlife Biologist for
the gregon Department of Fish and Wildlife;
5. "Concerns with Blue Water Boat Amendment and Applicant's Response to the
Concerns," Exhibit 6}, prepared by the City of Springfield Planning and Development
Department;
6. Blue Water Boat Plan Amendment, Flaod PlainlFloodway," Exhibit 2} prepared by
Branch Engineering;
7. "Analysis of L-COG Parcel File Data," Exhibit 10};
S. "Addendum tolNorking Paper, Developed and Committed Lands,"October,1989, Lane
County;
9. "Wildlife Protection and Mitigation Plan," agreed to by ODFW, the City of Springfield
and Blue Water Boats, Inc. 4Exhibit 7}.