HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 20355
=~-
COUNCIL ORDINANCE NUMBER 20355
COUNCIL BILL NUMBER 4912
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A
CHAMBERS SPECIAL AREA ZONE;
AMENDING SECTIONS 9.0500, 9.1030,
9.8030, AND 9.8865 OF THE EUGENE
CODE, 1971; ADDING SECTIONS
9.3050 TO 9.3065 TO THAT CODE;
AMENDING THE EUGENE ZONING
MAP; ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
ADOPTED: December 12, 2005
PASSED: 5:1
REJECTED:
OPPOSED: Kelly
ABSENT: Bettman, Ortiz
EFFECTIVE: January 13, 2006 or upon date of
acknowledgment, whichever is later.
ORDINANCE NO. 20355
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A CHAMBERS
SPECIAL AREA ZONE; AMENDING SECTIONS 9.0500,
9.1030, 9.8030, AND 9.8865 OF THE EUGENE CODE,
1971; ADDING SECTIONS 9.3050 TO 9.3065 TO THAT
CODE; AMENDING THE EUGENE ZONING MAP;
ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The definitions of "Alley Access Lot/Parcel" and "Lot Coverage" in
Section 9.0500 of the Eugene Code, 1971, are amended, and a definition of "Dormer: is
added in alphabetical order therein, to provide:
9.0500 Definitions. As used in this land use code, unless the context requires otherwise,
the following words and phrases mean:
Alley Access Lot/Parcel. A lot or parcel abutting an alley and not abutting a street
and created from the rear portion of an existing lot or parcel. For purposes of EC
9.3050 through 9.3065, an alley access lot or parcel is one that abuts an alley but
does not abut a street.
Dormer. A window or ventilation opening set vertically on a sloping roof. The
dormer has its own roof, which may be flat, arched, or sloped. A dormer mayor may
not have its own sidewalls.
Lot Coverage. That portion of a lot which, when viewed directly from above, would
be covered by a building or structure, or any part thereof, except that the following
structures or parts of structures shall themselves not be included in calculating lot
coverage:
(A) Any part of a structure without a roof.
(8) Roof eaves.
(C) Carports, porches, and balconies that are open at least 50 percent of their
respective perimeter. The percentage calculation for adjacent carports,
porches, and balconies that are separated by a common wall shall be
determined individually for each carport, porch, or balcony.
Section 2. Section 9.1030 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended by adding the
following in alphabetical order to the Table 9.1030 Special Area Zone listing:
Ordinance - 1
9.1030
Establishment and List of Zones. The zones listed in Table 9.1030 Zones are
established as follows:
Broad Zone Cate 0
S ecial
Table 9.1030 Zones
Zone
Chambers S ecial Area Zone
Section 3. The following caption and Sections 9.3050, 9.3055, 9.3060, and
9.3065, are added to the Eugene Code, 1971, to provide:
S-C Chambers Special Area Zone
9.3050 Purpose of S-C Chambers Special Area Zone. The S-C Chambers Special Area
zone is intended to:
(1) Protect and maintain healthy existing residential neighborhoods by ensuring
compatible design for infill development in terms of mass, scale, orientation
and setback to complement patterns in the existing neighborhood;
(2) Promote a general increase in density with a mix of multi-family and single
family residential development that contributes positively to the neighborhood
pattern of single family detached dwellings;
(3) Protect existing commercial businesses, encourage commercial infill,
redevelopment and development with design standards that support the
neighborhood cohesiveness;
(4) Create transitions between higher intensity commercial land uses and
residential neighborhoods, in terms of building heights, set backs and building
facades;
(5) Establish, strengthen, and maintain a high quality urban environment with
compatible commercial, residential and industrial use; and
(6) Create a pedestrian friendly environment.
9.3055 S- C Chambers Special Area Zone Sitina Reauirements. In addition to the
approval criteria in EC 9.8865 Zone Change Approval Criteria, the site must be
included within the area depicted on Map 9.3055 S-C Chambers Special Area Zone
and subareas. When property is rezoned to S-C, as part of the rezoning process,
the city shall identify the subarea designation applicable to the property. Within the
S-C Chambers Special Area Zone, the three subareas are:
(1) S-C/R-1;
(2) S-C/R-2;
(3) S-C/C-2.
The applicable subareas shall be as shown on Map 9.3055 S-C Chambers Special
Area Zone, unless a different subarea designation is found to be consistent with EC
9.3050 Purpose of S-C Chambers Special Area Zone.
9.3060 S-C Chambers Special Area Zone - Land Use and Permit Reauirements and
Special Use Limitations. Except where the standards in EC 9.3065 S-C Chambers
Special Area Zone Development Standards specifically provide otherwise:
Ordinance - 2
9.3065
(1) The land use and permit requirements and special use limitations applicable in
the S-C/R-1 subarea shall be those set out at EC 9.2740 and EC 9.2741 for
uses in the R-1 zone.
(2) The land use and permit requirements and special use limitations applicable in
the S-C/R-2 subarea shall be those set out at EC 9.2740 and EC 9.2741 for
uses in the R-2 zone.
(3) The land use and permit requirements and special use limitations applicable in
the S-C/C-2 subarea shall be those set out at EC 9.2160 and EC 9.2161 for
uses in the C-2 zone.
S-C Chambers Special Area Zone - Development Standards.
(1) Application of Standards. The standards in this section 9.3065 apply to uses
and development established within the S-C Chambers Special Area Zone
after December 12, 2005. As used in this section, "residential building" means
a building containing one or more dwellings. In the event of a conflict between
other provisions of this code and the provisions of this section, the specific
provisions of this section 9.3065 shall control.
(2) Development Standards Applicable in the S-C/R-1 Subarea. Except as
provided in this subsection, the development standards applicable in the S-
C/R-1 Subarea shall be those set forth in EC 9.2750 to EC 9.2777 for the R-1
zone, Special Development Standards for Certain Uses in EC 9.5000 through
EC 9.5850, and the General Standards for all Development in EC 9.6000
through 9.6885.
(a) Lot Size Minimums for Flag Lots. In lieu of any conflicting provisions in
EC 9.2750 to 9.2777 for flag lots in the R-1 zone, the following standards
apply for flag lots in the S-C/R-1 subarea:
1. Single dwellings and attached secondary dwellings: minimum lot
size 4,500 square feet.
2. Detached secondary dwellings: minimum lot size 6,000 square feet.
3. The original lot, prior to creation of the flag lot, is not subject to a
minimum lot size of 13,500 square feet.
In calculating the lot area, only the flag portion of the lot (exclusive of the
pole) is counted.
(b) Detached Secondary Dwellings. In lieu of conflicting provisions in EC
9.2750 to 9.2777 for secondary dwellings in the R-1 zone, in the S-C/R-1
subarea:
1. Detached secondary dwellings are permitted on alley access lots
and flag lots.
2. Building heights for all detached secondary dwellings shall not
exceed 20 feet.
3. A pedestrian walkway from the street or alley to the primary
entrance of the detached secondary dwelling is not required.
(c) Allev Open Space. In lieu of conflicting provisions in this code regulating
alley open space, the following standards apply to all development in the
S-C/R-1 subarea having a residential building that is accessed from an
alley:
1. An open space area of at least 400 square feet is required. Except
as provided in 2. below, the open space area shall abut the alley on
at least 25% of the lot width at the alley property line, be a minimum
Ordinance - 3
of 10 feet in depth at the alley property line, and may include areas
within setbacks. See Figure 9.3065(2)(c)1., Alley Open Space.
2. Alley open space required in 1. above may be placed behind
parallel parking on the lot. See Figure 9.3065(2)(c)1.
(3) Development Standards Applicable in S-C/R-2 Subarea. Except as
provided in this subsection, the development standards applicable in the S-
C/R-2 subarea shall be those set out in EC 9.2750 to 9.2777 for the R-2 zone,
Special Development Standards for Certain Uses in EC 9.5000 through EC
9.5850, and the General Standards for all Development in EC 9.6000 through
9.6885.
(a) Density Standards. In lieu of the density standards for the R-2 zone in
Table 9.2750 and EC 9.2750(1), there is no minimum density requirement
regardless of lot size, and the following maximum density standards
apply:
1. For lots with street access:
a. One dwelling unit if the lot area is less than or equal to 4,500
square feet.
b. Two dwelling units if the lot area is greater than 4,500 square
feet and less than or equal to 9,200 square feet.
c. Three dwelling units if the lot area is greater than 9,200 square
feet.
2. For alley access lots: One dwelling unit regardless of lot size.
(b) Buildina Setbacks. In lieu of the setback standards for the R-2 zone in
Table 9.2750 and EC 9.2751, the following setback requirements apply:
1. Front Yard Setbacks.
a. Alley access lots have no front yard setback requirement.
b. Residential buildings not on an alley access lot:
(1) Minimum setback: Except as allowed by EC 9.6745
Setbacks-Intrusions Permitted, all residential buildings
shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from front lot
lines.
(2) Maximum setback: At least 1 residential building shall
have its main facade within 25 feet of the front lot line the
facade faces. An adjustment to this standard may be
made based on the criteria in EC 9.8030 (2) and (23)(a).
c. Garages and accessory buildings not on an alley access lot.
Garages and accessory buildings shall be set back a minimum
of 18 feet from the front lot lines and a minimum of 6 feet
behind the street-facing facade of the residential building
closest to the street it faces.
2. Interior Yard Setbacks. Except as provided in d through f of this
subparagraph:
a. The interior yard set back from a lot line adjacent to an alley
shall be at least 5 feet.
b. An interior yard setback, or a segment of an interior yard
setback:
(1) For a lot with street access where the interior yard
setback is not adjacent to an alley; and
(2) Where all points on the interior lot line, or segment of lot
line to which the setback applies are located within 60
Ordinance - 4
feet of a front lot line that is perpendicular to the side of
the lot along which the interior lot line lies,
shall be at least 5 feet from the interior lot line and a
minimum of 10 feet from structures on other lots. In
addition, at a point that is 12 feet above grade, the
setback shall slope at the rate of 10 inches vertically for
every 12 inches horizontally (approximately 50 degrees
from vertical) away from the lot line. See Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.b., Interior Yard Setbacks (Front).
c. All other interior yard setbacks, or segments of interior yard
setbacks, not covered in subparagraphs a. and b., shall be at
least 5 feet from the interior lot line and a minimum of 10 feet
from structures on other lots. In addition, at a point that is 8
feet above grade, the setback shall slope at the rate of 10
inches vertically for every 12 inches horizontally
(approximately 50 degrees from vertical) away from the lot
line. See Figure 9.3065(3)(b)2.c., Interior Yard Setbacks
(Rear).
d. All intrusions allowed by EC 9.6745 ("Setbacks-Intrusions
Permitted"), and not explicitly covered by other provisions of
this special area zone standard, are allowed.
e. On a lot with street access, a residential building with a main
roof ridgeline parallel to the front lot line may have a single
gable or hipped portion on each side of the structure intrude
into the sloped portion of the interior yard setback, as long as
the entire intrusion is within 60 feet of the front lot line and the
maximum width of the part of the structure that penetrates the
sloped setback is 35 feet. For lots with more than 1 front lot
line (e.g. corner lots) the 60 foot distance shall be measured
from the shortest front lot line. See Figure 9.3065(3)(b)2.e.,
Interior Yard Setbacks (Gables).
f. A residential building may have a maximum of 4 dormers, with
a maximum of 2 dormers per side of the roof, that intrude into
the sloped portion of an interior yard setback, as long as each
dormer that intrudes on the setback meets the following
req uirements:
(1) Has a minimum setback of 5 feet from interior lot lines
and is a minimum of 10 feet from structures on other lots.
(2) Maximum width.
(a) There is no maximum width for a dormer that has
an end (face) wall that does not face a street and is
setback at least 30 feet from the nearest lot line the
end wall faces.
(b) The maximum width for all other dormers that
intrude into the setback is 10 feet measured
between the sidewalls or maximum roof opening,
whichever is greater.
(3) The dormer's sidewalls (if any) are setback a minimum of
2 feet from the nearest parallel outer wall of the main
structure to which the dormer is attached. See Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.f., Interior Yard Setbacks (Dormers).
Ordinance - 5
g. Standards in this subsection 2. may be adjusted if consistent
with the criteria of EC 9.8030(23)(b).
3. Window Setback Above First Floor. Windows above the first floor
shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from interior lot lines that are
not adjacent to an alley. Windows that are within 60 feet of the front
lot line of a lot with street access, and that are in a gable end of a
residential building with a main roof ridgeline parallel to the front lot
line are excluded from this setback requirement. For lots with more
than 1 front lot line (e.g. corner lots) the 60 foot distance shall be
measured from the shortest front lot line. See Figure
9.3065(3)(b)3., Interior Yard Setbacks (Windows).
(c) Building Heiaht. In lieu of the building height standards for the R-2 zone
in Table 9.2750 and EC 9.2751, the following apply:
1. For lots with street access:
a. The maximum height of any part of a residential building within
60 feet of the front lot line is 27 feet. For lots with more than 1
front lot line (e.g. corner lots) the 60 foot distance shall be
measured from the shortest front lot line. Adjustments to the
standard in this subsection (c)1.a may be made based on the
criteria of EC 9.8030(23)(c).
b. The maximum height of any part of a residential building other
than within the area specified by subparagraph a. is 18 feet.
c. The maximum height of any part of a garage or accessory
building is 18 feet.
2. For alley access lots, the maximum height of any part of any type of
structure is 18 feet.
3. The height of any part of a structure shall be measured as its
distance above grade.
4. Chimneys on residential buildings may exceed the maximum height
limits by no more than 5 feet.
(d) Residential Building Standards. In lieu of conflicting development
standards in this code for residential buildings within the R-2 zone,
residential buildings shall comply with the following standards:
1. All roof surfaces on residential buildings over 200 square feet, other
than as provided for porches and dormers in subparagraphs a. and
b., shall have a minimum slope of 6 inches vertically for every 12
inches horizontally unless adjusted based on the criteria of EC
9.8030(23)(d), and a maximum slope of 12 inches vertically for
every 12 inches horizontally.
a. Dormers meeting the following criteria have no minimum roof
slope requirement:
(1) Dormers less than 10 feet wide, as measured between
sidewalls or maximum roof opening, whichever is
greater.
(2) Dormers on the rear (Le., the side opposite the street the
residential building faces) of the residential building
closest to the street.
b. Residential building porches meeting the following criteria
have no minimum roof slope requirement:
(1) Porches less than 100 square feet.
Ordinance - 6
Ordinance - 7
(2) Porches on the rear (Le., the side opposite the street the
residential building faces) of the residential building
closest to the street.
2. Front Entries.
a. The residential building closest to the street shall include a
main entry oriented to and visible from the street.
b. On corner lots with multiple residential buildings, all residential
buildings shall include a main entry oriented to and visible from
a street.
(e) Garaqe and Accessory Buildinqs Standards. In lieu of conflicting
standards in this code applicable to garage and accessory buildings
within the R-2 zone, the following standards apply:
1. Garage door widths.
a. Except for a garage oriented to an alley, only 1 garage door,
with maximum width of 9 feet and maximum height of 8 feet, is
allowed within 30 feet of the front lot line.
b. For a garage oriented to an alley, 1 garage door 18 feet wide
and 8 feet high or 2 garage doors 9 feet wide and 8 feet high,
are permitted.
2. Accessory buildings over 200 square feet in area shall have a
minimum roof pitch of 6 inches vertically for every 12 inches
horizontally.
(f) Drivewav Standards. In lieu of conflicting standards in this code
applicable to driveway and curb cut requirements within the R-2 zone, the
following standards apply:
1. Street Access Driveway Width.
a. The maximum driveway width for a single-car garage is 13
feet.
b. No driveway shall be wider than 13 feet within 30 feet of the
front property line.
c. The maximum curb cut width is limited to 13 feet for each lot.
d. If a driveway is to be located adjacent to an existing driveway
on adjacent property, the maximum shared driveway width
shall be 24 feet.
Walkways adjacent to a driveway shall be included in calculating the
driveway width.
2. Alley Access Driveway Width. The maximum driveway width is 20
feet within the first 30 feet of the alley property line.
3. Adjustment. The driveway width standards in this subsection (f)
may be adjusted based on the criteria of EC 9.8030(23)(e).
(g) Allev Open Space. In lieu of conflicting provisions in this code regulating
alley open space, the following standards apply to all development in the
S-C/R-2 subarea having a residential building that is accessed from an
alley:
1. An open space area of at least 400 square feet is required. Except
as provided in 2. below, the open space area shall abut the alley on
at least 25% of the lot width at the alley property line, be a minimum
of 10 feet in depth at the alley property line, and may include areas
within setbacks. See Figure 9.3065(2)(c)1., Alley Open Space.
2. Alley open space required in 1. above may be placed behind
parallel parking on the lot. See Figure 9.3065(2)(c)1..
(h) Lot Standards. In lieu of conflicting lot standards for the R-2 zone in
Table 9.2760 and EC 9.2761 Special Standards for Table 9.2760, the
following minimum standards apply to all new lots created after December
12,2005 or requests for property line adjustments to existing lots that are
submitted after that date:
1. Minimum lot frontage: 45 feet. For alley access lots, lot frontage is
that portion abutting the alley.
2. Minimum lot width on street or alley: 45 feet.
3. Minimum lot depth (interior yard): 45 feet.
4. Maximum lot size: 13,500 square feet.
5. Alley access lots are permitted, subject to the development
standards of this section.
6. Flag lots are not permitted.
7. The following special limitations shall apply:
a. Lot Aggregation: 2 or more lots or parcels shall not be
combined or reconfigured such that the resulting number of
lots or parcels is reduced. This requirement includes, but is
not limited to partition or subdivision replats and property line
adjustments.
b. Property line adjustments: Property lines may be adjusted up
to 5 feet, measured perpendicularly from the existing property
line, provided that all other provisions of this section and EC
9.8400 through EC 9.8420, Property Line Adjustments, have
been met.
(i) Adiacent Lot Development. Developments that span 2 or more adjacent
lots must meet standards for each individual lot (e.g. density, setbacks,
etc.).
U) Vehicle Use Area. The total vehicle use area shall not exceed 20 percent
of the lot size.
(4) Development Standards Applicable in the S-C/C-2 Subarea. Except as
provided in this subsection, the development standards applicable in the S-
C/C-2 subarea shall be those set forth in EC 9.2170 to 9.2181 for the C-2 zone,
Special Development Standards for Certain Uses in EC 9.5000 through EC
9.5850, and the General Standards for all Development in EC 9.6000 through
9.6995.
(a) Street Facades. Ground floor facades that are 15 feet or closer to the
front property line shall have windows, arcades, colonnades, display
windows, entry areas, awnings, canopies or other similar features along
no less than 50% of their horizontal length.
(b) Heiaht Limitation. No portion of a building located within 50 feet of a
residential zone shall exceed the maximum height in that residential
zone's or overlay zone's accessory building height limit.
Section 4. A new Subsection (23) is added to Section 9.8030 of the Eugene
Code, 1971, to provide:
9.8030 Adiustment Review - Approval Criteria. The planning director shall approve,
conditionally approve, or deny an adjustment review application. Approval or
Ordinance - 8
conditional approval shall be based on compliance with the following applicable
criteria.
(23) S-C Chambers Special Area Zone. The following standards applicable within
the S-C Chambers Special Area Zone may be adjusted upon a finding that the
adjustment is consistent with the criteria of subparagraphs (a) through (e). In
all cases, proposed adjustments to the standard shall be the minimum
necessary to implement the development proposal:
(a) Residential Buildina Maximum Front Yard Setback. The maximum front
yard setback for residential buildings as established in EC
9.3065(3)(b)1.b.(2) may be adjusted if the proposed setback adjustment
is consistent with the overall front yard setback pattern of the
neighborhood, particularly with existing dwellings on both sides of the
front yard and within the immediate block.
(b) Interior Yard Setbacks. An adjustment may be granted to the interior yard
setback requirements of EC 9.3065(3)(b)2. if the proposed adjustment is
consistent with the purpose of EC 9.3050 and is necessary for
development on a constrained site. However, in no case is an interior
yard setback allowed that is less than 5 feet from the interior lot line or
less than 10 feet from structures on other lots.
(c) Buildina Heiaht. The building height standards of EC 9.3065(3)(c)1.a. for
residential buildings within 60 feet of the street may be increased to a
height of up to 30 feet if the applicant can demonstrate that the requested
adjustment meets all of the following criteria:
1. The proposed dwelling is shown to be compatible with other
dwellings in the immediate vicinity, in terms of scale, mass and
setbacks.
2. The additional height will not adversely impact the immediate
neighbor's privacy, considering backyard privacy, location of second
story windows facing adjacent yards and dwellings, etc.
3. Constraints on the property necessitate the adjustment in height,
with consideration being given to protecting existing mature trees,
lot configuration, and existing structures on site.
(d) Roof Pitch. The minimum roof pitch standard of EC 9.3065(3)(d)1. may
be adjusted if the proposed adjustment conforms with prevailing
neighborhood context of roof pitch and articulated roof massing. The
applicant shall submit examples of other roof forms in the immediate
vicinity with the adjustment application.
(e) Drivewav Standards. An adjustment to the driveway width standards of
EC 9.3065(3)(f) may be granted if the proposed adjustment is necessary
for development on a constrained site taking into consideration unique
situations such as existing structures on the lot, joint driveway access,
and existing mature landscaping.
Section 5. Subsection (4) of Section 9.8865 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is
amended by adding a new subparagraph (g) thereto, and relettering the current
subparagraphs (g) through (q) to (h) through (r), to provide:
Ordinance - 9
9.8865
Zone Chanae Approval Criteria. Approval of a zone change application, including
the designation of an overlay zone, shall not be approved unless it meets all of the
following criteria:
(4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting
requirements set out for the specific zone in:
(g) EC 9.3055 S-C Chambers Special Area Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(h) EC 9.3105 S-CN Chase Node Special Area Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(i) EC 9.3205 S-DW Downtown Westside Special Area Zone Siting
Requirements.
U) EC 9.3305 S-E Elmira Road Special Area Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(k) EC 9.3705 S-RP Riverfront Park Special Area Zone SitinQ
Requirements.
(I) EC 9.3805 S-RN Royal Node Special Area Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(m) EC 9.3905 S-W Whiteaker Special Area Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(n) EC 9.4205 /EC East Campus Overlay Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(0) EC 9.4715 /wP Waterside Protection Overlay Zone SitinQ
Requirements.
(p) EC 9.4915 /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone Siting
Requirements (only for the purposes of adding the overlay zone. See
EC 9.4960.).
(q) EC 9.4815 /WB Wetland Buffer Overlay Zone SitinQ Requirements.
(r) An uncodified ordinance establishing a site specific S-H Historic Special
Area Zone, a copy of which is maintained at the city's planning and
development department.
Section 6. Map 9.3055, S-C Chambers Special Area Zone, and Figures
9.3065(2)(c)1., Alley Open Space, 9.3065(3)(b)2.b., Interior Yard Setbacks (Front),
9.3065(3)(b)2.c., Interior Yard Setbacks (Rear), 9.3065(3)(b)2.e. Interior Yard Setbacks
(Intrusions), 9.3065(3)(b)2.f. Interior Yard Setbacks (Dormers), and 9.3065(3)(b)3.,
Interior Yard Setbacks (Windows), as referenced in this Ordinance are attached hereto,
to be numerically incorporated in Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971.
Section 7. The Legislative Findings set forth in the attached Exhibit A serve as
support for this ordinance, but are not adopted.
Ordinance - 10
Section 8. The Eugene Zoning Map is amended to remove the existing zones
from the properties identified on Exhibit B attached hereto and to replace those zones
with the S-C Chambers Special Area Zone.
Section 9. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the concurrence of the
City Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any reference errors contained
herein or in other provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971, to the provisions added,
amended or repealed herein.
Section 10. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent
jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof.
Section 11. Notwithstanding the effective date of ordinances as provided in the
Eugene Charter of 2002, this Ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of
its passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor, or upon the date of its
acknowledgment as provided by ORS 197.625, whichever is later.
12th day of December, 2005
Approved by the Mayor this
14th day of December, 2005
Passed by the City Council this
-1.'\J\a\;~~
~ty Recorder
1:-- ~ fu.. ~
Mayor
Ordinance - 11
Map 9.3055
5 -( (hambers 5 pecial Area Zone and 5 ubareas
~
,
, ,
.; V1"1 .
I ' ,
,-0 ; I
IQi ! i
ice'" .
, n:l .--
1<1 :~ i
; L. _1- j i
7th Ave"
1'"
. .~. --.;. '"\
"I
I
, ' ,
'- ._.... ~_ ".,.,(
,9!b A.ve.,'
I ; I
I i I'
r 1 I :_'H'
:C'. ;;' ':::.' .,J,..
1_,.. ~__ ,..:__..1._: ~~
! '
_ i.. "
: i
""li
,..
: r-I..
I:
\1
I : ...A ;
J~,,~~L~,:,~1'(1i~,l ~:.
: :E:
L:<cL_,..._.. _.
[ -.
I
I
L.
:J
"f--I" --,-
i
,_-.-::~: -=;r_, . -'. "
,
, I: .-"
... 13th Ave
~ t~- ~". ~-i
'.;ti(T
'"Oi j
wi
"'If:"
..'tBc
. L
~": 14th Av~
I"" --'; ~"r
;Vi'
:1._"... ' ID I
.;>. .
..,;~"....
"--,- - ..~"
... .... 13th...Ave_ .
. V'l!
~ V) i
". ; Q; I
~~I
. /0'
"6'
'i11h.A'LEi
. '-T' - t'
"
Ii
.....'.
V'l,
J ~t!~~: .Ci".
.' ~ .
"-"'"1~,'''''''
iV'll
. . "j......C ~ ..1
'1/01 !
'....
'(9:
.,-.\ !
1'-
j
i_
__.1,_
___.l
"~~
". _ A_ ',-_, ,~_\
. - -" -I
',-
,.-.;
"'l- .
I
i
. . ..._,....
C Chambers Special Area Zone Boundary
I S-C/R-1 t Low Density Residential 1
__ Medium Density Residential Areas affected by
_ C 't C . I proposed zone change
ommunI y ommercla
...
N
Figure
9.3065(2)( c)1
Alley Open Space
5'.0"--i-J..- ~
Interior'!
Setback I !
, ,
Structure
~"
I' Interior
Setback
i
i
i
i
,
5'-0"~
Interior 'I I
Setback :
.
~
~"
i Interior
I Setback
____ 1_' _____________'
t= 56'-0" Property Width
EXAMPLE A
~
bQ~
_I '-..0
.1205
-tE.OO
0>.
.' (I)
'=t=
.-<(
->1<--
~
b.Q~
, ....c
I .l~~
... i ..t+
: ,"0'-0' M"""l" --
D. 0 >.
flveway .;. ~
---561:<yprop~rty:~;rh'- ~~
EXAMPLE B
5'-0" ---J.--J..
Interior 'I
Setback
,
~
~"
I I' Interior
: Setback
! i
: .
~
bQ~
~-'~~
E.OO
.. -..
----.-- --
. .
. 14'-0" db >.
____~50(~Of.Lot~id~~__1~
56'-0" Property Width
EXAMPLE C
Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.b
Interior Yard Setbacks
(Front)
Iw
'Z
I:J
.~
10:
'W
10..
,0
0:
0..
~Q (j-+-,'
~ ~,\<b~,
~~~t::J~'
~'\~~~, ,
'1it::J'"
,
r
I
I
I
, 12
" 110
,
,
,
,
,
" .
I
,.
I
Iw
'Z
I:J
'~
10:
'W
10..
,0
0:
0..
v
12' (WITHIN 60' OF STREET PROPERTY LINE.)
5'-0" INTERIOR YARD SETBACK
GROUND PLANE
1
!
I
FRONT SECTION I ELEVATION DIAGRAM
..,.-
,'" I"'"
.",..,'\r...... I"'"
..,."" , ,,'C" I"
....-- ,','" I "
..... " " '" - - 4- - _.... "
A_ ,',' .".~., I -_....__',
" , , _--, '- I _ ~~_"
" --(, ---- " -~--- --~...
- ",,'-- '~~ "..l..~--- .,.--
...,-- #__.-=--~_~ ---:::.~~~-:, I
" - -- '\ ..,. ~~ -- - I _
" -' -:--- -- ..,."" -'1"""""" ~ - -:.. =:--;--.>00---
Adjacent Lot I .........._~__-..,...,...,. ..,."" ;::.__- -___
I ...~;~...-*itI*- L.....-- ..__-:.......
~:.;::;;~>- ~I ..,. '"': :::.'---
-- -~<:~~~. ..1k.. ....: ..,. ..,. ;::.:- ..;::.~
Street Sid~ ~ -'---~.-:.:.-' ~O'
Property Lme -~
Interior Yard
Sloped Setback
at "Side" Property
Line
Adjacent Lot
PERSPECTIVE DIAGRAM
Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.c
Interior Yard Setbacks
(R ea r)
Iw
'Z
l::i
'~
10:
'W
In.
,0
0:
n.
'" ,
v
~() (jot-" 12
~,~~~' ''l1O
~~()~, ,
.~.:<"~R~ , ,
~~o "
~, ,
, ,
, ,.
I f
II
GROUND PLANE
Iw
'Z
l::i
'~
10:
'W
In.
,0
0:
n.
8' (NOT WITHIN 60' OF STREET PROPERTY LINE.)
5'-0" INTERIOR YARD SETBACK
1
I
I
REAR SECTION/ELEVATION DIAGRAM
/ Interior Yard
Sloped Setback
At "Rear" Interior
"'" "'" "'" 7" Property Line
~...,'...... ,"
......-- ,',~~ I',
...... ,," I "
...... ,',' '" _,,4--_ "
,.-..., ,',' _..>~- I ---___ ........
, . ... ',_--- \.'-. I .- ----....----t
,.\ _--f,:_-- \\ ~:~::::: -;...- I
,'........._...~, lo. .-.-:--.;:~~-L.-<:::..,,;;;:...~-:"''''" ~I 8'
~'--''''''':'' --~.--_....-- ~\ ...,... -----::~ ..",.".
Adjacent Lot >..". -. . - - - "'" "'" 1"'" - - .. >C.-
. .................\---- "'" "'" "'" "'" "'" "'".-. .-.-
I' ~.~.C$a...~'""'''''.-','::",......''' ""....... .-;:..",."...."".,..
.Jr;~.........,,;.:"'''' '...' : :1 ... -:,.",."..""""
.......-......."'."".,. 100. ..1 ......~_.
--... ..... """"..
~.-._. .~ "'"~"'" :;:'::'.-.0'
Street Side -'-.~.-. .
Property Line . - Adjacent Lot
Note: Interior Slope
Setback Is Not
Applicable To Interior
Yards On Alleys. See
EC 9.3065(3)(b)2.a.
PERSPECTIVE DIAGRAM
Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.e
Interior Yard Setbacks
(Gables)
..
, \
/ ,
1f7 \
~ \
,:~ \
,. ,"" ,
,'",'!.( \
r ;',."'4. ,
,f "" 1'\ \
.".... /.~.... /-l~' \
'... /./. \~'-.. \
,'/ -'// /" ........._~ \ ---~ ,
,.,/," /',," "",-- -. 4
';"~ , \\~_--... ,
" /' " ,- - -. , I
" ',\\ ----,~.--L..
\.' ,'....-J, '";>'
'\,' " ",'
,11, '.
... , '"
, ,
, ,'"
Gable Roof May Intrude
Interior Yard Sloped
Setback No More Than
35' In Width.
PERMITTED GABLE ROOF INTRUSIONS
Figure
9.3065(3)(b)2.f
Interior Yard Setbacks
(Dormers)
....'"
'/ ,
,~... ,
",,'...' ,
~"" ,
''''.1(', ... ,
,'.../ ",/ \ ,,'" ,
," 1'''' )( , ,
" ,,/.../ ',\ "
, "
" ,
, , '
-'- ,~
'\. - - '--:::--. -;-e: I
, - -,. - _ .-.1....
" --.J '>
, .
,--
,
,
,
"
~'
r
I
1" -----__ , ' /' ,,' /"
,.,. 1----. ,// , ~.
./" a.:'....._______ _I 'J- '//' ,'~.'
.... -,.',,---. -. ....'"
__ .... --. -'-'''.. I // "--,"
---."'""- -"'-... ------..",' /' ," .'
--- -.... "./
.---.......... ---...&." /-
-----/.
PERMITTED DORMER INTRUSIONS
Two Dormers May
Intrude Into Interior
Yard Sloped Setback
(No More Than 1 0'
Wide Per Dormer).
The Dormers Must
Be Setback A
Minimum Of 2' From
Nearest Parallel
Outer Wall.
Figure
9.3065(3)(b )3
Interior Yard Setbacks
(Windows)
10'.0"
Setback To Exterior
Surface Of Upper
Level Windows
10'.0"
Setback To Exterior
Surface Of Upper
Level Windows
t- 5'.0"
.
EXAMPLE A
-f-S'.O"
.
EXAMPLE B
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 20355
Legislative Findings
(CA 04-5 and Z 05-14)
Establishment of the Special Area Zone
9.3020 Criteria for Establishment of an S Soecial Area Zone. Before adopting an
ordinance establishing a S Special Area Zone, the city council shall find that the
proposal is in compliance with following criteria:
(1) The area to which the S Special Area Zone is being applied meets at least one of
the following criteria:
(a) Is identified in the Metro Plan or a refinement plan as appropriate for
nodal development or for a special range of uses or development that can best
be achieved with the use of a special area zone; or
(b) Possesses distinctive buildings or naturalfeatures that require special
consideration to ensure appropriate development, preservation, or
rehabilitation. In order to be considered distinctive, it must be demonstrated
that:
1. The area is characterized by buildings that merit preservation in
order to protect their special features; or
2. The area contains natural features that have been identified by
the city as worthy of special treatment or preservation.
The Chambers area meets criterion (l)(a) above. This area is identified as area 1.C. on the
unadopted advisory map entitled "Potential Nodal Development Areas for the Eugene-
Springfield Metro Area" in TransPlan.
(2) An analysis of the area demonstrates how the uses and development standards
of the S Special Area zone ordinance will facilitate implementation of the
planned use of the property or the preservation or rehabilitation of distinctive
buildings or natural features of benefit to the community.
The proposed amendment meets this criterion. The report, Chambers Reconsidered: Promoting
Compatible Development in a Mature Neighborhood (2005) provides an analysis of the area that
demonstrates how the proposed development standards of the Chambers Special Area Zone will
facilitate the planned uses in the area. The ETN, R-1 and C-2 subareas each have specific
development standards that implement the recommendations of the analysis, which allows for
compatible infill development within the neighborhood.
(3) Except for areas zoned S-H Historic Special Area zone, the area to be classified
S Special Area includes at least ~ acre in area.
Exhibit A-I
The proposed amendment meets this criterion. The area included in the S-C Special Area Zone
is 81 acres in size.
(4) The application of the zone to the properties proposed for inclusion in the S
Special Area zone and the required provisions of a special area zone ordinance are
consistent with the criteria required for approval of a zone change, according to EC
9.8865 Zone Change Approval Criteria.
Compliance with the zone change criteria is outlined below.
Application of the Special Area Zone to the Site
9.8865 Zone ChanJ!e Approval Criteria. Approval of a zone change application,
including the designation of an overlay zone, shall not be approved unless it meets all
of the following criteria:
(1) The proposed change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan.
The written text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro Plan diagram
where apparent conflicts or inconsistencies exist.
The proposed change is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Metro Plan.
Applicable Metro Plan Policies
Residential Densitv Policv A-9 {(Establish density ranges in local zoning and
development regulations that are consistent with the broad density categories of this
plan. "
Low density: Through 10 dwelling units per gross acre (could translate up to 14.28 units
per net acre depending on each jurisdictions implementation measures and land use and
development codes).
Medium density. Over 10 through 20 dwelling units per gross acre (could translate to
over 14.28 units per net acre through 28.56 units per net acre depending on each
jurisdictions implementation measures and land use and development codes.
High density. Over 20 dwelling units per gross acre (could translate to over 28.56 units
per net acre depending on each jurisdiction's implementation measures and land use and
development codes.)
The proposed zone is consistent with Metro Plan density policies. The zone will provide for
residential densities up to 14.28 units per net acre within the area designated for Low Density
development; and will provide for a density level of approximately 15 units per net acre within
the area designated for Medium Density Residential development.
Exhibit A - 2
Residential Densitv Policv A-IO. "Promote higher residential density inside the urban
growth boundary that utilizes existing infrastructure, improves the efficiency of public
services and facilities, and conserves rural resource lands outside the urban growth
boundary. "
The proposed amendments are consistent with this policy. Infill and redevelopment projects
allowed within this zoning district will utilize existing infrastructure, improve efficiency of
public services and facilities, and conserve rural resource lands.
Residential Density Policy A-II. "Generally locate higher density residential
development near employment or commercial services, in proximity to major
transportation systems or within transportation-efficient nodes. "
The proposed amendments are consistent with this policy. The amendments will encourage the
development of higher density development within areas that are within walking distance of
employment areas, commercial services, and major transit facilities.
Residential Densitv Policv A-I3. "Increase overall residential density in the metropolitan
area by creating more opportunities for effectively designed in-ftll, redevelopment, and
mixed use while considering impacts of increased residential density on historic, existing
and future neighborhoods. "
The proposed zone change will provide opportunities for additional development within the
affected area thereby increasing overall residential densities while reducing development impacts
to existing neighborhood character.
Residential Densitv Policv A-I4. "Review local zoning and development regulations
periodically to remove barriers to higher density housing and to make provisions for a full
range of housing options. "
The Chambers Reconsidered project reviewed existing zoning regulations intended focusing on
elements of the code that affect the compatibility of new development with existing
development. By providing a greater degree of assurance that new development within the area
will be compatible with the existing neighborhood, resident opposition to development should be
diminished, thus removing - or at least reducing - an existing barrier to higher density housing.
Residential Densitv Policv A-IS. "Develop a wider range of zoning options such as new
zoning districts, to fully utilize existing Metro Plan density ranges. "
The proposed regulations implemented by this zone change represent a new approach to
increasing the acceptance of in fill and redevelopment projects in existing neighborhoods. The
City's range of zoning options will be broader upon its adoption.
Exhibit A - 3
Residential Housim! Tvpes and Tenure Policv A-17 "Provide opportunitiesfor afull
range of choice in housing type, density, size, cost, and location.
The proposed zone change will expand opportunities for a range of choices in housing type, density,
size and cost by providing for certainty and reduced opposition to new residential development
within the study area.
Residential Housin1! Tvpes and Tenure Policv A-20 "Encourage home ownership of all
housing types, particularly for low-income households. "
The proposed regulations will encourage the development of smaller housing units in the area.
Those units will be more affordable than larger units, thus encouraging home ownership for
lower income households.
Residential Desien and Mixed Use Policv A-23 "Reduce impacts of higher density
residential and mixed use development on surrounding uses by considering site,
landscape, and architectural design standards or guidelines in local zoning and
development regulations. "
The proposed amendments support this policy. The development standards in the Chambers
Special Area zone, specifically in the S-C/R-2 subarea provide for new development at higher
densities than currently exists. The development standards include requirements for limits on
building heights, building setbacks, window placement, lot size and allowable number of units
on lots. These standards are intended to reduce the impacts of infill development on the existing
neighborhoods. Additional standards in the S-C/C-2 subarea will require lowered building
heights for commercial buildings adjacent to residentially zoned property. These development
standards will lessen the impact to the existing neighborhood. Generally, the proposed
amendments will influence the form and character of new development by addressing the site,
the landscape in which new buildings will be placed, and the architectural details of those new
buildings.
Residential Desi1!n and Mixed Use Policv A-24 "Consider adopting or modifying local
zoning and development regulations to provide a discretionary design review process or
clear and objective design standards, in order to address issues of compatibility,
aesthetics, open space, and other community concerns. "
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers Special Area zone regulations
included clear and objective design standards. Those standards address compatibility, aesthetics,
open space and "other community concerns."
Transportation Policv F.l Apply nodal development strategy in areas selected by each
jurisdiction that have identified potential for this type of transportation-efficient land use
paUern.
Exhibit A - 4
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers study area is one of38 areas
identified in TransPlan as having potential for applying the nodal (mixed use) development strategy.
The proposed amendments address one of several identified barriers to implementing the mixed use
concept in the study area. The process of removing barriers to implementation of the mixed use
concept is consistent with this policy.
Transportation Policv F.2 Support application of the nodal development strategy in
designated areas through information, technical assistance or incentives.
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers area received a technical assistance
grant from the Oregon Department of Transportation to recommend code changes and for this
mixed use area The Chambers Reconsidered process supported the application of the strategy
through the development and dissemination of information and the provision of technical assistance.
Transportation Policv F.3. Provide for transit-supportive land use patterns and
development, including higher intensity, transit-oriented development along major
transit corridors and near transit stations, medium-and high-density residential
development within ~ mile of transit stations, major transit corridors, employment
centers, and downtown areas; and development and redevelopment in designated areas
that are or could be well served by existing or planned transit.
The proposed amendments support this policy. The area is served by several transit routes to the
north on 8th Avenue and to south on 11th and 13th Avenues. Areas designated for medium and high-
density residential development are well-served by existing transit lines. The amendments provide
greater certainty that new development within the study area will be compatible with existing
development thereby reducing neighborhood opposition to continued densification of the area.
Transportation Policv F.4. Require improvements that encourage transit, bicycles, and
pedestrians in new commercial, public, mixed-use, and multi-unit residential
development.
The Chambers Reconsidered process included an Operational and Pedestrian Safety Analysis that
recommends a number of operational improvements to study area intersections and streets for the
purpose of improving conditions for pedestrians and bicyclists. Those street improvement
recommendations have been forwarded to the City Council for consideration.
Transportation Policv F.5 Within three years of Trans Plan adoption, apply the ND, Nodal
Development, designation to areas selected by each jurisdiction, adopt and apply
measures to protect designated nodes from incompatible development and adopt a
schedule for completion of nodal plans and implementing ordinances.
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers study area is identified as a potential
nodal area. Adoption ofthe Chambers Special Area zone works toward implementation of this
policy although additional actions will be necessary to fully implement the policy.
Exhibit A - 5
(2) The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable adopted refinement
plans. In the event of inconsistencies between these plans and the Metro Plan, the
Metro Plan controls.
Westside Neif!hborhood Plan Policies
2. Support improving existing housing and reducing the number of substandard
units.
The proposed amendments support this policy. The residential development standards contained
within the Chambers Special Area zone support the improvement of existing housing in the area,
including substandard housing. The standards will encourage the improvement of substandard
housing by requiring specific design standards for alterations to existing housing.
3. The City shall continue to recognize this area (Central Residential Area) as
appropriate for medium-density residential development and shall discourage
non-residential uses. This policy applies to all portions of the Central Residential
Area, even those properties abutting major arterials such as Chambers Street and
West 11th Avenue."
The proposed amendments support this policy. The allowable densities are within the range
allowed within the medium-density designation. The list of allowable land uses within the area
is not proposed to be changed.
4. The City shall encourage actions that will preserve existing residential structures,
including rehabilitation, block planning, infilling, and shared housing.
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers Special Area zone focuses on the
preservation of the character of the existing neighborhood, while allowing compatible infill
development. Reductions in allowable densities within the study area and limits on lot
aggregations will serve to limit the construction oflarger multi-family residential complexes,
such as apartment buildings, within that portion of the study area to be zoned S-C/R-2. Existing
structures are more likely to be preserved through the application of the density limits and other
provisions of the draft code.
Jefferson Far West Refinement Plan Policies
Residential Policv 1. 0 "Encourage both public and private actions that will improve the
overall appearance of the area and the condition of residential structures. "
The proposed amendments support this policy. The development standards contained within the
Chambers Special Area zone include provisions that will improve the appearance of new
residential structures built in the area. For example, the height and setback requirements, fayade
Exhibit A - 6
orientation, garage location and driveway width are all directed at improving the character and
appearance of new residential construction.
Residential Policv 2.0 "Increase the opportunity for home ownership within the area. "
· Reduce minimum lot size for ownership
· Encourage new res. Develop that provide opportunity for home ownership
· Explore ownership opportunities that might be available to persons with low
incomes.
· Allow cottage units, alley housing and shared housing.
The proposed amendments support this policy. Opportunities for home ownership should be
improved through the provision of smaller-scale housing on alleys and through the provision for
generally smaller-scale housing throughout the residential area. Opportunities for home ownership
are directly influenced by housing costs, which in turn are, to some extent, influenced by the size of
the structures being sold. Generally, the proposed amendments support the construction of smaller-
scale housing within the study area.
Residential Policv 3.0 "Encourage a mixture of housing densities and types to allow a
diverse population group to live within the area. "
The proposed amendment support this policy. The area is already quite diverse in its demographic
makeup, housing densities and housing types. The amendments will have no negative affect the
range of housing types that will be allowed within the study area but are likely to promote additional
alley access units and cottages throughout the area.
Commercial Policv 2.0 "Encourage both public and private actions which will improve
the overall appearance of commercial areas and the condition of non-residential
structures. "
The proposed amendments support this policy. The Chambers Special Area zone contains
development standards for the S-C/C-2 subarea that will promote improvements to the overall
appearance of commercial developments along major streets and local streets. The proposed
standards also address the form and appearance accessory buildings and garages and should
improve the general condition of those structures over time.
North Low-Densitv Residential Area (Broadwav to 1 rI' west of Chambers) "The City
shall continue to recognize the area as suitable for low-density housing. Efforts shall be
made to maintain and improve the existing housing stock through both public and private
investments. In an effort to allow additional residential units and yet maintain the
character of the area, the City shall encourage block planning, infilling, and shared
housing. Access to housing units off of alleys shall be accommodated when not in
conflict with other policies and goals. "
Exhibit A - 7
The proposed amendments support this policy. The area remains suitable for low-density
housing. New development standards applicable to the S-CIR-l subarea will promote the
development of additional accessory dwelling in this zone, thus promoting infill development in
the area. Access to alley housing units is provided for in these amendments.
Central Low-Densitv Residential Area, (J Zh -1 jh, Garfield to Chambers) "The low-
density designation recognizes existing residential development and land uses. The City
shall continue to recognize the residential character of the area and provide incentives for
public and private rehabilitation of rundown structures. In addition, the City shall
encourage block planning, infilling and shared housing. Access to housing units off of
alleys shall be accommodated when not in conflict with other policies and goals. "
The proposed amendments support this policy. The area remains suitable for low-density
housing. New development standards applicable to the S-CIR-1 subarea will promote the
development of additional accessory dwelling in this zone, thus promoting infill development in
the area. Access to alley housing units is provided for in these amendments.
(3) The uses and density that will be allowed by the proposed zoning in the location
of the proposed change can be served through the orderly extension of key urban
facilities and services.
New development occurring within the area can be served through the orderly extension of key
urban facilities and services.
(4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting requirements
set out for the specific zone in:
(a) EC 9.2150 Commercial Zone Siting Requirements.
***
(P) An un codified ordinance establishing a site specific S-H Historic Special
Area Zone, a copy of which is maintained at the city's planning and
development department.
EC 9.8865(4) does not include reference to siting requirements for the S-C Special Area Zone
because that zone is being created as part of this action. See below for discussion of amendment
to EC 9.8865(4) to add a reference to the siting requirements for this new special area zone. The
application of the S-C Special Area Zone to the proposed properties is consistent with the siting
standards proposed to be adopted for the special area zone.
Exhibit A - 8
Code Amendment
9.8065 Code Amendment Approval Criteria. If the city council elects to act, it may, by
ordinance, adopt an amendment to this land use code that:
(1) Is consistent with applicable statewide planning goals as adopted by the
Land Conservation and Development Commission.
Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement. To develop a citizen involvement program that insures
the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process.
The City has acknowledged provisions for citizen involvement which insure the opportunity for
citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process and set out requirements for such
involvement. The action taken did not amend the citizen involvement program. The process for
adopting these amendments complied with Goal 1 since it complied with, and surpassed the
requirements of, the citizen involvement provisions. Specifically, the following actions were
taken to insure adequate citizen participation in the project:
· Proiect Notification: Staff provided notification of the project to both the Jefferson
Westside and Far West neighborhood organizations through newsletter articles prior to
the project's commencement. This was followed by a project-specific newsletter to all
property owners, residents and tenants within the Chambers Study area announcing the
project and the first project meeting. The notices were mailed to more than 1700
addresses within the study area as well as to several hundred other interested parties who
live outside of the study area but who requested notification.
. Proiect Newsletters Following the initial newsletter mailing, project newsletters were
mailed to all 1700 addresses in the study area prior to the October and November general
meetings. After the November meeting, newsletters were mailed only to those who had
attended previous meetings and others who had requested that their names be placed on
the project notification list.
. Backf!round Information. Maps and Proiect Information. All background maps
produced for the 1998 Existing Conditions Report were updated to show current
conditions for each factor mapped. All tables and text in the report were evaluated for
currency and were updated where necessary. The full Existing Conditions Report and a
Summary of the full report were made available to the public prior to the first meeting.
. Bicvcle Tour. On October 19, just before conducting the Neighborhood Design
Preferences Survey, staff and consultants joined about 20 area residents for a bike tour of
the neighborhood. We began by following the tour map but responded to participants
suggestions to view other buildings that were not on the tour route.
. Neighborhood Meetings. Five general neighborhood meetings were held; one each in
September, October and November and two in April. Meeting attendance grew from
about 20 to nearly 50 participants by November and remained fairly constant throughout
the remainder of the project. The September neighborhood meeting was held to explain
the project, field questions and stimulate discussion; the October and November meetings
were dedicated to conducting and translating the Neighborhood Design Preferences
Exhibit A - 9
Survey. The two April meetings were held to present the draft standards and guidelines
and the conclusions of the traffic study to area residents.
· Neighborhood Design Preferences Survev The survey is a unique public participation
tool. The survey allows a given audience to provide preference feedback (likes and
dislikes) on visual images that illustrate a set of physical characteristics. The images can
be standardized for multiple presentations or customized to focus on a unique set of
conditions. Surveys can be done citywide, as was done in the 1994 TransP1an process, or
for a smaller area like a neighborhood, as was done for the Chambers project.
The Chambers Reconsidered Neighborhood Design Preferences Survey was crafted to
identify local preferences related to commercial and residential infill and redevelopment
in the Chambers area. The survey design responded to a criticism of the traditional visual
preference survey that, in the traditional survey, the viewer of an image does not
necessarily know what, specifically, is being evaluated. The Chambers survey was
modified to ask respondents to judge the image in the context of a stated topic. All
images in the slide show were identified as having a theme or topic ("mass and scale",
"parking", etc.) that provided a clue about what information we were seeking.
The survey was given to the group on October 19; the results were presented on
November 16. The results presentation was formatted to identify tentative "conclusions"
reached by the consultants, while allowing the group to comment on those conclusions.
Sometimes the group added new information; sometimes they corrected the consultant's
or staffs impressions about what was meant or what was said. The November meeting
was intended to provide an additional interaction between participants, consultants and
staff that would result in a refined, mutual understanding of the project's objectives.
Information derived from the survey was fed directly into the development of draft codes
( standards) and guidelines.
· Focus Group On Friday March 18, 2005, the consultant team and City staff conducted
an all-day workshop in which the draft standards and guidelines were introduced and
discussed. Half of the day was committed to work on residential standards; half was
committed to commercial standards. While there was an attempt to include testing of the
draft standards as part of each half-day meeting, that part of the program was less
successful than anticipated due to the complexity of the task and the amount of discussion
between participants that was necessary to proceed with testing. The discussions
between participants, consultants and staff however, were very productive and enabled
the consultants and staff to move forward with drafting the standards and guidelines.
Several months before the workshop, City staff created an event application form to
insure that a full range of neighborhood interests were represented in the process. That
form was distributed at the November neighborhood meeting, was posted on the City's
Mixed Use Development website and was available at the Permit Information Center.
The form asked applicants to disclose which interest groups they represented and why
they would like to serve on the group. The application process was left open between
November 16, 2004 and January 28,2005.
Exhibit A-I 0
Twenty-seven applications were received. Thirteen of the applicants indicated an interest
in attending the residential focus group; 8 indicated a preference for the commercial
focus group, and 6 indicated an interest in attending both. On February 24,2005 the
Planning Commission approved all 27 applications to serve on the focus group and
participate in the workshop.
. Interaction and additional meetings with interested parties. This project generated an
unusually high number of e-mail exchanges between neighborhood residents, consultants
and city staff. Most of the e-mail dialogue was carried on between City staff and
members of Chambers Area Families for Healthy Neighborhoods (CAFHN), an
organization of area residents who were very active in this planning process. Staff
received approximately 300 e-mails between September and May, many of which
requested data, information, or answers to questions. In addition to the scheduled
meetings with all interested parties, staff and consultants met with representatives of
CAFHN on two occasions to discuss code concepts for the "East Traditional
Neighborhood" area that was of greatest interest to CAFHN members.
. Internet Postings. All materials relating to this project have been posted on the Planning
and Development Department Mixed Use Development website
Therefore, the process followed is consistent with Goal 1.
Goal 2 - Land Use PlanninI!. To establish a land use planning process and policy
framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure
an adequate factual basis for such decisions and actions.
The record shows that there is an adequate factual base for the actions.
The Goal 2 coordination requirement is met when the City engages in an exchange, or invites
such an exchange, between the City and any affected governmental unit and when the City uses
the information obtained in the exchange to balance the needs of the citizens. To comply with
the Goal 2 coordination requirement, the City engaged in an exchange about the subject of this
action with all of the affected governmental units (i.e."those local governments, state and federal
agencies and special districts which have programs, land ownerships, or responsibilities within
the area included in the plan.'1 Specifically, the City met several times with the Oregon
Department of Transportation to insure that transportation-related investigations affecting State
Highways within the study area were consistent with the State's needs. Notice of the planning
process and proposed amendments have also been provided to School District 4-J; the City of
Springfield, Lane Transit District, and Lane County.
There are no Goal 2 Exceptions required for this action. Therefore, the amendments are
consistent with Goal 2.
Exhibit A-II
Goal 3 - Al!ricultural Lands. To Preserve Agricultural Lands.
The amendments are for property located within the urban growth boundary and do not affect
any land designated for agricultural use. Therefore, Goal 3 does not apply.
Goal 4 - Forest Lands. To conserve forest lands.
The amendments are for property located within the urban growth boundary and do not affect
any land designated for forest use. Therefore, Goal 4 does not apply.
Goal 5 - Open Spaces. Scenic and Historic Areas. and Natural Resources. To conserve
open space and protect natural and scenic resources.
These amendments do not create or amend the city's list of Goal 5 resources, do not amend a
code provision adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific
requirements of Goal 5, do not allow new uses that could be conflicting uses with a significant
Goal 5 resource site and do not amend the acknowledged UGB. Therefore, Goal 5 does not
apply.
Goal 6 - Air. Water and land Resource Oualitv. To maintain and improve the quality
of the air, water and land resources of the state.
The amendments to not affect the City's ability to provide for clean air, water or land resources.
Therefore, Goal 6 does not apply.
Goal 7 - Areas Subiect to Natural Disasters and Hazards. To Protect life and property
from natural disasters and hazards.
The actions do not effect the City's restrictions on development in areas subject to natural
disasters and hazards. Further, they do not allow for new development that could result in a
natural hazard. Therefore, Goal 7 does not apply.
Goal 8 - Recreational Needs. To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the
state and visitors, and where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary
recreational facilities including destination resorts.
The plan amendments do not effect the city's provisions for recreation areas, facilities or
recreational opportunities. Therefore, Goal 8 does not apply.
Goal 9 - Economic Development. To provide adequate opportunities throughout the
state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of
Oregon's citizens.
Exhibit A - 12
The amendments do not impact the supply of industrial or commercial lands. Therefore, the
amendments are consistent with Goal 9.
Goal] 0 - Housinf!. To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state.
The amendments do not impact the supply of residential lands. Therefore, the amendments are
consistent with Goal 1 O.
Goal 11- Public Facilities and Services. To plan and develop a timely, orderly and
efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for
urban and rural development.
The plan amendments do not effect the City's provlSlon of public facilities and servIces.
Therefore, Goal 11 does not apply.
Goal]2- Transportation. To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic
transportation system.
Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012-0060) contains the following requirement:
(1) Amendments to . . . land use regulations which significantly affect a transportation
facility shall assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity,
and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility....
(2) A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if
it:
(a) Changes the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation
facility;
(b) Changes standards implementing afunctional classification system;
(c) Allows types or levels of land uses which would result in levels of travel or access
which are inconsistent with the functional classification of a transportation facility; or
(d) Would reduce the performance standards of the facility below the minimum acceptable level
identified in the TSP
The proposed amendments are consistent with Goal12. The proposed amendments will not
change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility. Nor will
they change standards implementing a functional classification system. Further, the amendments
will not allow types or levels of land uses which would result in levels of travel or access which
are inconsistent with the functional classification of a transportation facility; or reduce the
performance standards of the facility below the minimum acceptable level identified in the TSP.
Goal]3 - Enerl!V Conservation. To conserve energy.
The amendments do not concern energy conservation. Therefore, Goal 13 does not apply.
Exhibit A - 13
Goal 14 - Urbanization. To providefor an orderly and efficient transition from rural
to urban land use.
The amendments do not affect the City's provisions regarding the transition ofland from rural to
urban uses. Therefore, Goal 14 does not apply.
Goal 15 - Willamette River Greenwav. To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the
natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands
along the Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway.
The amendments do not contain any changes that affect the regulation of areas within the
Willamette River Greenway. Therefore, Goal 15 does not apply.
Goal 16: Estuarine Resources, Goal 17: Coastal Shorelands, Goal 18: Beaches and
Dunes, and Goal 19: Ocean Resources.
Goals 16 through 19 apply to Coastal Resources. The requirement that a site-specific historic
zone be applied only to an area that is consistent with that zone's siting requirements does not
implicate Goals 16-19.
(2) Is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and applicable
adopted refinement plans.
Applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and adopted refinement plans are addressed above.
(3) In the case of establishment of a special area zone, is consistent with EC 9.3020
Criteria for Establishment of an S Special Area Zone.
The criteria at EC 9.3020 are addressed above.
Exhibit A - 14
Exhibit B
Chambers Special Area Zone
Subject to Zone Change
Tax Lot Current Zone ProDosed Zone Owner
1704362105600 C-2 S-C/C-2 KIEFER JOHN P 1/ & CORINNE R
1704362105500 C-2 S-C/C-2 HAMMER JOHN P
1704361213200 C-2 S-C/C-2 MARSHALL JAMES 0 & LAURA C
1704361214100 C-2 S-C/C-2 MARSHALL JAMES 0 & LAURA C
1704361214200 C-2 S-C/C-2 COLTRIN LEWIS TE
1704361214900 C-2 S-C/C-2 ORCHARD DONALD L TE
1704361215000 C-2 S-C/C-2 RODE GEORGE
1704361215700 C-2 S-C/C-2 LEE DAVID E
1704361216000 C-2 S-C/C-2 KALBERER COMPANY
1704361216300 C-2 S-C/C-2 ROPCHAN GEORGE & WILMA W
1704361216400 C-2 S-C/C-2 PRICHARD DENNIS R
1704361216500 C-2 S-C/C-2 PRICHARD DENNIS R
1704361217600 C-2 S-C/C-2 LEHNER JOACHIM J & KARIN
1704361219100 C-2 S-C/C-2 WELLS FARGO BANK
1704361215100 C-2 S-C/C-2 BRYSON THEODORE J
1704361216600 C-2 S-C/C-2 PRICHARD DENNIS R
1704362105700 C-2 S-C/C-2 KIEFER JOHN P 1/ & CORINNE R
1704361216100 C-2 S-C/C-2 NWH PROPERTIES LLC
1704361216900 C-2 S-C/C-2 PRICHARD DENNIS R
1704361217000 C-2 S-C/C-2 AUKERMAN ROBERT W & JULIE 0
1704362105800 C-2 S-C/C-2 GEIDIS HOLDING INC
1704361216200 C-2 S-C/C-2 RAPPAPORT RICHARD I
1704362401901 C-2 S-C/C-2 PEARSON COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES LLC
1704362401900 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPICER JAMES I
1704362402000 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPICER JAMES I
1704362402100 C-2 S-C/C-2 WOOD TECH SERVICES
1704362410400 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPROAT CHERYL A TE
1704362410500 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPROAT CHERYL A TE
1704362410700 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPROAT CHERYL A TE
1704362410600 C-2 S-C/C-2 SPROAT CHERYL A TE
1704361318701 C-2 S-C/C-2 MILL RACE LLC
1704362410800 C-2 S-C/C-2 UNIT SUPPL Y CO
1704362410900 C-2 S-C/C-2 UNIT SUPPL Y CO
1704362411000 C-2 S-C/C-2 GABER MICHAEL L & JAMIE A
1704362412400 C-2 S-C/C-2 HUNT DENNIS M & MYRA J
1704362412802 C-2 S-C/C-2 G & G ASSOCIATES LLC
1704362412900 C-2 S-C/C-2 L1N RICHARD T
1704362413200 C-2 S-C/C-2 B & A INC .
1704362413300 C-2 S-C/C-2 SMITH CARLA C
1704361318702 C-2 S-C/C-2 MILL RACE LLC
1704362412800 C-2 S-C/C-2 SIMRELL ROBERT 0 & VICKIE K
1704362410802 C-2 S-C/C-2 OLSON FAMILY PROPERTIES LLC
1704362412801 C-2 S-C/C-2 MATTSON FAMILY LLC
1704362410801 C-2 S-C/C-2 INGAR PROPERTIES
1704362411300 C-2 S-C/C-2 STEBBEDS TONY A TE
1704362411900 C-2 S-C/C-2 CAG FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1704362412000 C-2 S-C/C-2 CAG FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1704362412100 C-2 S-C/C-2 CAG FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1704362412600 C-2 S-C/C-2 GRACEN JAMES & BELINDA
1704362412701 C-2 S-C/C-2 COLLEGE PLY INC
1704362413000 C-2 S-C/C-2 UN RICHARD T
1704362413100 C-2 S-C/C-2 B & A INC
! Tax Lot I Current Zone I Proposed Zone I Owner I
1704362413301 C-2 S-C/C-2 SUPER SITES LLC
1704361318600 C-2 S-C/C-2 COCHRANE GERRY 0
1704361318500 C-2 S-C/C-2 ALEXANDER CATHERINE V
1704361318703 C-2 S-C/C-2 ZELEN DONALD J & JEANNE L
1704363104600 C-2 S-C/C-2 PETERSEN MARCIA G TE
1704363104700 C-2 S-C/C-2 PETERSEN RONALD 0
1704363103600 C-2 S-C/C-2 MADRONE ENTERPRISES LLC
1704363103200 C-2 S-C/C-2 ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY
1704363103500 C-2 S-C/C-2 ST VINCENT DEPAUL SOCIETY
1704363102200 C-2 S-C/C-2 MALK LLC
1704363102100 C-2 S-C/C-2 YAMANAKA VERN & MARY C
1704363101500 C-2 S-C/C-2 SEMASKO JOHN E TE
1704363101700 C-2 S-C/C-2 SEMASKO JOHN E TE
1704363101800 C-2 S-C/C-2 SEMASKO JOHN E TE
1704363101900 C-2 S-C/C-2 HOL VERSTOTT TREV A
1704363100100 C-2 S-C/C-2 MOORE JACK L
1704364205800 C-2 S-C/C-2 JONGEWARD SNElL TE
1704364206100 C-2 S-C/C-2 KLOHS EUGENE L & ELSIT A G
1704364205600 C-2 S-C/C-2 LOSCO MARK A
1704364205200 C-2 S-C/C-2 DIVINE & HAMMER LLC
1704363103700 C-2 S-C/C-2 MADRONE ENTERPRISES LLC
1704363102000 C-2 S-C/C-2 HAMMER JOHN P 3-4
1704363103802 C-2 S-C/C-2 MADRONE ENTERPRISES LLC
1704363102300 C-2 S-C/C-2 HASTINGS VICTOR 0
1704364205000 C-2 S-C/C-2 GRAY GREGORY W
1704363101400 C-2 S~C/C-2 SEMASKO JOHN E TE
1704364205100 C-2 S-C/C-2 RAYMOND G WOLFE REV TR
1704364206000 C-2 S-C/C-2 KLOHS EUGENE L
1704363100600 C-2 S-C/C-2 MOORE JACK L
1704364206300 C-2 S-C/C-2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FEDERAL
1704363100700 C-2 S-C/C-2 KLOCEK STELLA A TE
1704363100800 C-2 S-C/C-2 R & R PERKINS LLC
1704364206400 C-2 S-C/C-2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FEDERAL
1704362402800 R-1 S-C/R-1 JACOBSON RICHARD A
1704362403300 R-1 S-C/R-1 NORTH AMERICAN ISLAMIC
1704362403600 R-1 S-C/R -1 NORTH AMERICAN ISLAMIC
1704362403700 R-1 S-C/R-1 NORTH AMERICAN ISLAMIC
1704362404000 R-1 S-C/R-1 JOHNS BETTY K
1704362404600 R-1 S-C/R-1 MOFFETT JAMIE W & JUDY K
1704362404700 R-1 S-C/R-1 BOLING ROGER
1704362405000 R-1 S-C/R-1 MACBEAR STEVE E
1704362405100 R-1 S-C/R-1 FELLOWS VIRGINIA J
1704362405500 R-1 S-C/R-1 STANFORD SUSANNE N & THAD C
1704362405600 R-1 S-C/R-1 MORRIGAN KENDRA
1704362405900 R-1 S-C/R-1 DEVORE SARAH
1704362406000 R-1 S-C/R-1 CLARK ARDETH J
1704362402700 R-1 S-C/R-1 ZUBER JOHN R & LEE M
1704362406100 R-1 S-C/R-1 LUCAS SHIRLEY
1704362402500 R-1 S-C/R-1 STONEBURNER WILLIAM E & C F
1704362402600 R-1 S-C/R-1 KERR TODD 0
1704362403000 R-1 S-C/R-1 GOLAN AMIR
1704362403100 R-1 S-C/R-1 WRIGHT REBECKAH F
1704362403400 R-1 S-C/R-1 FINCH ORSON J & BEULAH B
1704362403500 R-1 S-C/R-1 GAZLEY LAURENCE 0 & KAREN A
1704362403800 R-1 S-C/R-1 SWIFT DALE E & CHRISTINE M
1704362403900 R-1 S-C/R-1 HUNTINGTON CELESTE L
1704362404300 R-1 S-C/R-1 IDAVIS KATYA
Tax Lot Current Zone Proposed Zone Owner
1704362404500 R-1 S-C/R-1 GOODWIN HEATHER N J
1704362404800 R-1 S-C/R-1 VELAZQUEZ ROBERTO
1704362404900 R-1 S-C/R-1 BIBLE IRENE H
1704362405200 R-1 S-C/R-1 BARTHELEMY E PAUL
1704362405300 R-1 S-C/R-1 HANSEN HAROLD R
1704362405700 R-1 S-C/R-1 THOMPSON ANGELA M
1704362405800 R-1 S-C/R-1 HUME ARVILLA E
1704362406200 R-1 S-C/R-1 CONLIN ANDRE LEE
1704362404400 R-1 S-C/R-1 DUGAN MARY ANN
1704362406300 R-1 S-C/R-1 LOUIE JACK & ILLlNE
1704362410200 R-1 S-C/R-1 SPROAT CHERYL A TE
1704362410201 R-1 S-C/R-1 FRIEND GRACE ELEANOR TE
1704362409900 R-1 S-C/R-1 APPIAH BEN
1704362409800 R-1 S-C/R-1 SUNDQUIST JOHN 0 & ROSE
1704362409500 R-1 S-C/R-1 ODEN GRACE F
1704362409400 R-1 S-C/R-1 PAOLO CAROL W
1704362409300 R-1 S-C/R-1 MOORE THADDEUS
1704362408900 R-1 S-C/R-1 NEWMAN DAVID L
1704362408500 R-1 S-C/R -1 SINGER STANLEY A
1704362408400 R-1 S-C/R-1 MERWIN DAVID 0 & SARAH S
1704362408100 R-1 S-C/R-1 GOFF ANNE
1704362408000 R-1 S-C/R-1 SUNDQUIST NEAL & ANGELA
1704362407600 R-1 S-C/R-1 WILLIAMS SEAN B
1704362407500 R-1 S-C/R-1 RICH JAMES W
1704362407100 R-1 S-C/R-1 OLDAKER WAYNE H & MARY JANE
1704362407000 R-1 S-C/R-1 ADAMS ROBERT C
1704362406900 R-1 S-C/R-1 PARK RODNEY & MANUELA
1704362406400 R-1 S-C/R -1 GRAY LILLIAN A
1704362406500 R-1 S-C/R-1 CHARTERS RICHARD 0 & CHLOE F
1704362410100 R-1 S-C/R-1 HOWE ROBERT N
1704362410000 R-1 S-C/R-1 SOGN DOUGLAS
1704362409700 R-1 S-C/R-1 ROSSI MARCELLO
1704362409600 R-1 S-C/R-1 SMITH SHIRLEY J TE
1704362409200 R-1 S-C/R-1 SMITH SHIRLEY J
1704362409100 R-1 S-C/R-1 BROCKETT DAVID W
1704362408800 R-1 S-C/R-1 MILETO JULIE MARIE
1704362408300 R-1 S-C/R -1 MACE LESLIE E & MARY
1704362408200 R-1 S-C/R-1 LAWS ERIC JASON
1704362407900 R-1 S-C/R-1 WOLLASTON GREGORY J & CORL YN K
1704362407800 R-1 S-C/R-1 WOLLASTON GREGORY J & CORL YN K
1704362407700 R-1 S-C/R-1 BRADFORD GLORIA
1704362407300 R-1 S-C/R-1 HARRIS MARK C
1704362407200 R-1 S-C/R-1 WHITBREAD JONATHAN DAVID
1704362406800 R-1 S-C/R-1 MCCOY JAMES RHEA
1704362406600 R-1 S-C/R-1 DAHLSTROM L YN
1704362406700 R-1 S-C/R-1 BREEDEN FLORENCE E
1704362411100 R-1 S-C/R-1 CHAN PHILLIP S K TE
1704362411500 R-1 S-C/R-1 KAOKEPT VIVA T
1704362411600 R-1 S-C/R-1 KAOKEPT VIVA T
1704362411700 R.1 S-C/R-1 LOHMAN SCOTT
1704362412700 R-1 S-C/R-1 ESTRADA GEORGE & L M
1704362411200 R-1 S-C/R-1 CHAN KAREN M TE
1704363103800 R-1 S-C/R-1 ROEHL NICHOLAS & SUZANNE
1704363104300 R-1 S-C/R-1 ZACATENCO JOSE L
1704363104200 R-1 S-C/R-1 LEMON HERBERT C & JANE C
I Tax Lot I Current Zone I Proposed Zone I Owner I
1704363104100 R-1 S-C/R-1 ROGERS DAVID C
1704363104000 R-1 S-C/R-1 KAVANEY PATRICK
1704363105700 R-1 S-C/R-1 DEFOE ALAN PAUL
1704363105900 R-1 S-C/R-1 HARRIS JACK & LAURA MAY
1704363106000 R-1 S-C/R-1 CHAMNESS SHARON L
1704363104801 R-1 S-C/R-1 BROWN RUTH IDA
1704363104800 R-1 S-C/R-1 CATHOLIC COMMUNITY
1704363107100 R-1 S-C/R-1 WEAVER BRIAN D
1704363107200 R-1 S-C/R-1 KAISER TIMOTHY A
1704363106200 R-1 S-C/R-1 KAPSALlS D SHIRLEY
1704363107000 R-1 S-C/R-1 TIRRILL DONALD H
1704363104900 R-1 S-C/R-1 SKY CATHRYN S
1704363106300 R-1 S-C/R-1 QUIGLEY SHASTA D
1704363105600 R-1 S-C/R-1 FORE ROBERT D & JUDY D
1704363105000 R-1 S-C/R-1 KIMBERLEY STEPHEN D
1704363105500 R-1 S-C/R-1 HARRINGTON RICHARD P & LINDA R
1704363105400 R-1 S-C/R-1 MORNINGSTAR REX & CHERISE
1704363106400 R-1 S-C/R-1 PETERSEN MYRA L
1704363106900 R-1 S-C/R-1 FOLSTON WILLIAM
1704363106800 R-1 S-C/R -1 FOLSTON WILLIAM
1704363106700 R-1 S-C/R-1 ALLENBAUGH TIMOTHY E
1704363108500 R-1 S-C/R-1 PETERSEN GREGORY A & MYRA L D
1704363108400 R-1 S-C/R-1 BRAINARD RONALD C & R C
1704363108300 R-1 S-C/R-1 MCNETT JANET E
1704363108200 R-1 S-C/R-1 HA TZIKALFAS JOHN & BROWN ALICE A
1704363108100 R-1 S-C/R-1 CAMPBELL SCOTT D & MARY E
1704363108000 R-1 S-C/R-1 CAMPBELL SCOTT D & MARY E
1704363105100 R-1 S-C/R-1 RICHMAN LINDA S
1704363105200 R-1 S-C/R-1 YUN HAE SHIK & OCK HEE
1704363106500 R-1 S-C/R-1 SWANSON-CALL CYNTHIA J
1704363106600 R-1 S-C/R-1 HASKELL SHARIE L
1704363107900 R-1 S-C/R-1 CAMPBELL SCOTT D & MARY E
1704361304100 R-2 S-C/R-2 SEAVER ORION & DAPHNE
1704361304000 R-2 S-C/R-2 KERSEY DAVID M
1704361303900 R-2 S-C/R-2 KERSEY DAVID M
1704361303800 R-2 S-C/R-2 SOGN PAUL & RACHELLE
1704361303700 R-2 S-C/R-2 KIERAN ROBERT G & FRANCES I CHRISTIE
1704361303100 R-2 S-C/R-2 GORDON CHRISTINE CHALMERS
1704361303000 R-2 S-C/R-2 PRENDERGAST TIMOTHY J
1704361302900 R-2 S-C/R-2 HANSON CAROL D
1704361302500 R-2 S-C/R-2 STAUB CAROLYN T
1704361302400 R-2 S-C/R-2 HILL RAYMOND & SUSAN STOKES
1704361301800 R-2 S-C/R-2 GRANTHAM HAROLD L & PEGGY R
1704361301700 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZWICK FRED N
1704361301600 R-2 S-C/R-2 STEPANOVICH DOREEN RUTH
1704361301500 R-2 S-C/R-2 HIRONS SHARON L
1704361300900 R-2 S-C/R-2 THOMAS CATHERINE W
1704361300200 R-2 S-C/R-2 ALBRECHT KURT & ALISON V
1704361300100 R-2 S-C/R-2 SIMONE DAVID W
1704361305200 R-2 S-C/R-2 PRAGER SHARON LYNN
1704361303101 R-2 S-C/R-2 FALSGRAF MITSUKO
1704361302800 R-2 S-C/R-2 FISHMAN ADAM
1704361301900 R-2 S-C/R-2 PARMAN ALICE TE
1704361301400 R-2 S-C/R-2 LINDSEY ROBIN A
1704361301000 R-2 S-C/R-2 CANTRELL SHANNON
1704361300300 R-2 S-C/R-2 HOROWITZ HAROLD & AUDREY
1704361305400 R-2 S-C/R-2 FARMER SANFORD
Tax Lot Current Zone Proposed Zone Owner
1704361303300 R-2 S-C/R-2 FRALICK CHRISTOPHER J
1704361302700 R-2 S-C/R-2 STAMBAUGH BONNIE S
1704361302302 R-2 S-C/R-2 SYRIOS WILLIAM L & TERESA S
1704361302300 R-2 S-C/R-2 SYRIOS WILLIAM L & TERESA S
1704361302000 R-2 S-C/R-2 LEE THEODORE & DEBORAH PTNRS
1704361300800 R-2 S-C/R-2 JORDAN JAMES A
1704361300400 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROSENBERG STACY R
1704361301100 R-2 S-C/R-2 HALBERT CATHLEEN L
1704361301300 R-2 S-C/R-2 KIRKPATRICK SCOTT D
1704361305504 R-2 S-C/R-2 BOLMAN ROBERT
1704361303500 R-2 S-C/R-2 MOSTKOFF DALE A
1704361303400 R-2 S-C/R-2 BONTE MARY BETH
1704361302200 R-2 S-C/R-2 THOMPSON ALICE CARY TE
1704361302100 R-2 S-C/R-2 TORRANCE JULIA E
1704361301200 R-2 S-C/R-2 PURVIS MATTHEW R 111
1704361300700 R-2 S-C/R-2 DRESSEKIE SADIE A
1704361300500 R-2 S-C/R-2 RINGER GREGORY D
1704361305505 R-2 S-C/R-2 GEORGE ALICE JEANNE
1704361303600 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROOKS CHERYL ANN
1704361300600 R-2 S-C/R-2 VIERRA NANCY
1704361307300 R-2 S-C/R-2 GERMANI JANE A
1704361307200 R-2 S-C/R-2 NEWINGHAM LARRY A
1704361308600 R-2 S-C/R-2 BEAUCHAMP MARK S & MARY A
1704361308800 R-2 S-C/R-2 STOUT ODILE C
1704361310200 R-2 S-C/R-2 CARRELCONSTANCEL
1704361310300 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROBERTS ELIZABETH TANNER
1704361308700 R-2 S-C/R-2 GERMANI JANE A
1704361310400 R-2 S-C/R-2 RASMUSSEN DAVID A
1704361310500 R-2 S-C/R-2 KARLE KRISTEN M
1704361310600 R-2 S-C/R-2 SELPH STEPHEN L & LAURA
1704361310700 R-2 S-C/R-2 THOMAS JACK R & JUDY F
1704361311700 R-2 S-C/R-2 STEVENS PATRICK L
1704361311800 R-2 S-C/R-2 MAY BARBARA DALE
1704361311900 R-2 S-C/R-2 SZMIT MIECZYSLAW L
1704361312200 R-2 S-C/R-2 PRESCOTT ALISON
1704361312300 R-2 S-C/R-2 DAVIS LOIS LIANNA
1704361312400 R-2 S-C/R-2 VIERRA LISA MAE
1704361308900 R-2 S-C/R-2 MARCUS HELENA E
1704361312500 R-2 S-C/R-2 OVERMAN RICHARD C JR
1704361307100 R..2 S-C/R-2 EWING TOM N & LISETTE S
1704361307400 R-2 S-C/R-2 VAZQUEZ DAVID
1704361308500 R-2 S-C/R-2 FINE KAREN H
1704361309000 R-2 S-C/R-2 PLUMMER JONANTHAN S
1704361310800 R-2 S-C/R-2 DAWNING JONI/HICKS DAVID CHARLES
1704361311600 R-2 S-C/R-2 SINNAMON SHANDRA S
1704361312600 R-2 S-C/R-2 LEFTON ENID D
1704361307000 R-2 S-C/R-2 BRUSCATOJACQUELlNE
1704361307500 R-2 S-C/R-2 HUMPHREY JOSHUA B & JENNY ANN
1704361308400 R-2 S-C/R-2 WEST COAST INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
1704361309100 R-2 , S-C/R-2 RUSSIAL JOHN T
1704361310900 R-2 S-C/R-2 CUNNINGHAM M DIANNE
1704361309200 R-2 S-C/R-2 KEIM JOSHUA A
1704361312700 R-2 S-C/R-2 KRESKO MICHAEL J
1704361308401 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROSSITER NEIL
1704361310000 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZORN MARK A & KATHLEEN J
1704361306900 R-2 S-C/R-2 ENGELMANN THERESE
1704361307600 R-2 S-C/R-2 KARLIK JOHN N
, Tax Lot I Current Zone IProposed Zone I Owner I
1704361311500 R-2 S-C/R-2 KIGER HUGH C
1704361312000 R-2 S-C/R-2 NEMIR MARIE L
1704361311000 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZORN MARK A & KATHLEEN J
1704361308300 R-2 S-C/R-2 TREVARROW WILLIAM W & EVA
1704361309300 R-2 S-C/R-2 PETH ICK STEPHEN J
1704361312900 R-2 S-C/R-2 DEGENEAUL T LEWIS ALLEN
1704361309600 R-2 S-C/R-2 CONTE PAUL T
1704361312800 R-2 S-C/R-2 PATTEN WILLIAM D & ELVA M
1704361309700 R-2 S-C/R-2 FOSS ESTHER
1704361306800 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZELAZEK CHRISTINA
1704361309800 R-2 S-C/R-2 WRIGHT CRAIG A
1704361309900 R-2 S-C/R-2 CURRY CAROL D
1704361307700 R-2 S-C/R-2 FARRELL ERIN M
1704361311100 R-2 S-C/R-2 BLACK WADE C & CYNTHIA A 1-2
1704361311200 R-2 S-C/R-2 SAC KEY JOHN B & RHONDA K
1704361311300 R-2 S-C/R-2 INMAN DEAN P
1704361311400 R-2 S-C/R-2 JOHNSTONE ART & TERRI TE
1704361313000 R-2 S-C/R-2 ANDERSON JERRY VERN
1704361306700 R-2 S-C/R-2 SPENCE CRAIG S
1704361307800 R-2 S-C/R-2 DOMINY JOHN W
1704361312100 R-2 S-C/R-2 BUSH JUDITH M
1704361308200 R-2 S-C/R-2 LYNCH JANET M
1704361309500 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROFSKY RICHARD I
1704361309400 R-2 S-C/R-2 EWERS SUSAN
1704361313100 R-2 S-C/R-2 STRAND VICTORIA R
1704361306600 R-2 S-C/R-2 SMOOT LISBETH ANNE
1704361307901 R-2 S-C/R-2 SCARBOROUGH JAMES W
1704361307900 R-2 S-C/R-2 KIRSCH AUDREY C
1704361306500 R-2 S-C/R-2 MCLAUGHLIN ALlSA
1704361308000 R-2 S-C/R-2 ARDEN-GENDEL WAKEROBIN
1704361308100 R-2 S-C/R-2 WEINSTEIN LESLIE A
1704361316401 R-2 S-C/R-2 COLLINS DANIEL S
1704361316300 R-2 S-C/R-2 SEIFERLlNG ERIKA
1704361315600 R-2 S-C/R-2 CABELL J NORTON & HOLLY H
1704361315400 R-2 S-C/R-2 HANSON lELAND E & KA THI E
1704361315300 S-H S-C/R-2 FELDMAN JACK & ANNE-MARIE L1ZET-
1704361313600 R-2 S-C/R-2 COLVIN F WARREN
1704361313500 R-2 S-C/R-2 SUVA DONALD CARL & LESLIE M
1704361318100 R-2 S-C/R-2 EICHBAUM FAMILY LIVING TRUST
1704361313300 R-2 S-C/R-2 FENECH JOSEPH
1704361313200 R-2 S-C/R-2 BAILEY ROGER F
1704361318000 R-2 S-C/R-2 WETHERBEE MARY R
1704361316700 R-2 S-C/R-2 KARMYKEL MARBEL
1704361316402 R-2 S-C/R-2 BUEL-MCINTIRE STEVEN & CRYSTAL
1704361313800 R-2 S-C/R-2 FENECH JOSEPH
1704361318200 R-2 S-C/R-2 ALVARADO JESSICA S
1704361317900 R-2 S-C/R-2 DAWSON SCOTT A & MELANIE J
1704361316800 R-2 S-C/R-2 WILLIAMS CATHERINE A
1704361316200 R-2 S-C/R-2 STEIN ALAN L
1704361315200 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROEHL NICHOLAS
1704361313700 R-2 S-C/R-2 FODOR ALEX & MIRAH
1704361313701 R-2 S-C/R-2 THORNTON OLIVER CROMWELL
1704361313900 R-2 S-C/R-2 CRECINE JOHN PATRICK
1704361317800 R-2 S-C/R-2 WISSIG RAYMOND W & KAREN K
1704361318300 R-2 S-C/R-2 WILLIAMS RICHARD D
1704361316900 R-2 S-C/R-2 MAHER MICHELLE
1704361316001 R-2 S-C/R-2 WALKER JOHN LAWRENCE
I Tax Lot I Current Zone I Proposed Zone I Owner I
1704361315900 R-2 S-C/R-2 AGUILAR-RICE SUSANA D
1704361315800 R-2 S-C/R-2 NAEGLE VANCE
1704361315700 R-2 S-C/R-2 HEIN EUGENE L & PATRICIA L
1704361315100 R-2 S-C/R-2 RONZIO ALAN J & CAMILLE J
1704361315000 R-2 S-C/R-2 HELM DAVID M & CHRISTINE E
1704361318400 R-2 S-C/R-2 HASS lONE TE
1704361314900 R-2 S-C/R-2 BANNON ALBERT J
1704361317700 R-2 S-C/R-2 HINGEL KAREN J
1704361317400 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROWN MARK ALAN
1704361317100 R-2 S-C/R-2 FULLBRIGHT THOMAS E
1704361314600 R-2 S-CfR-2 JAST AD GARY C
1704361314400 R-2 S-C/R-2 POSTLES ANNABELLE
1704361314300 R-2 S-C/R-2 W ADDUPS CHARLES F
1704361314100 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZINNKER MARK W & STACEY M
1704361317600 R-2 S-C/R-2 LANGFORD GREGORY B
1704361317500 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROWN CAROL A
1704361316000 R-2 S-CfR-2 BEVER EVA WRIGHT
1704361317200 R-2 S-CfR-2 MCNEELEY CAMERON
1704361314800 R-2 S-C/R-2 CARON-LONG TERRY
1704361314200 R-2 S-C/R-2 BIKE LORETTA Y T & ROBERT L
1704361314000 R-2 S-C/R-2 DONOHUE NORMAND A JR & PATRICIA A
1704361314500 R-2 S-C/R-2 PERRYMAN PAMELA J
1704361317300 R-2 S-C/R-2 PAGE JUDITH ANN
1704361314700 R-2 S-C/R-2 LAMONS KENNETH 0
1704364204600 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROWN MARK ALAN
1704364403800 R-2 S-CfR-2 SRIJUNY ANONT EKASIT
1704364203700 R-2 S-C/R-2 HANNON TIFFANY LYNN
1704364203500 R-2 S-C/R-2 COLE HOWARD P & PATRICIA J
1704364203400 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROWN MARK A
1704364203300 R-2 S-C/R-2 SHAPITKA JOSEPH U TE
1704364201700 R-2 S-C/R-2 KRAMARAE CHERIS
1704364201600 R-2 S-C/R-2 ST ALBOW ROBERT A
1704364201500 R-2 S-C/R-2 OSTEN GLORIA G TE
1704364201400 R-2 S-C/R-2 EYMAN GAIL D
1704364200400 R-2 S-C/R-2 HAYDEN CEDRIC L & MARILYN A
1704364200300 R-2 S-C/R-2 HAYDEN CEDRIC L & MARILYN A
1704364200100 R-2 S-C/R-2 CAMPBELL LENA
1704364203900 R-2 S-C/R-2 PAULSEN GERRY
1704364201800 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZIBELMAN S J & SHERMAN S R
1704364201900 R-2 S-C/R-2 BROWN DANIEL T
1704364204700 R-2 S-C/R-2 NICHOLS DAVID ALAN & KRISTINE LYNN
1704364203600 R-2 S-C/R-2 CARY-HOBBS JESSE
1704364204000 R-2 S-C/R-2 HILTY JEFFREY R & GRETA E
1704364201300 R-2 S-C/R-2 EYMAN GARY R & GAIL
1704364202100 R-2 S-C/R-2 FRAUMAN-PRICKEL MAXINE
1704364202000 R-2 S-C/R-2 MOBLEY RYAN
1704364200502 R-2 S-C/R-2 NIEMEYER FRED
1704364200501 R-2 S-CfR-2 W ALTERS PETE & DORRINDA
1704364204801 R-2 S-CfR-2 CARLlER DAVID GASTON
1704364204500 R-2 S-C/R-2 CARLlER DAVID G
1704364204100 R-2 S-C/R-2 COX NATHAN
1704364203100 R-2 S-C/R-2 SABALA ELLE A
1704364203200 R-2 S-C/R-2 ' BIRZER RANDY E
1704364202701 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROBERTS TERRY A & LINDA L
1704364202200 R-2 S-CfR-2 IVY VERNA LEA
1704364202300 R-2 S-C/R-2 HARRISON PAMELA A
1704364200600 R-2 S-C/R-2 FEHSENFIELD ROBIN NYBERG
Tax Lot Current Zone Proposed Zone Owner
1704364201200 R-2 S-C/R-2 EYMAN GAIL D
1704364200900 R-2 S-C/R-2 CROOK MARJORIE ANN
1704364204800 R-2 S-C/R-2 ZEGAR ELIZABETH
1704364203000 R-2 S-C/R-2 HAGER ROBERT T
1704364204400 R-2 S-C/R-2 HERBST NINA K
1704364204300 R-2 S-C/R-2 FUEHRING DAN ALAN
1704364204200 R-2 S-C/R-2 FROHBACH LINDA L
1704364201100 R-2 S-C/R-2 SCHMAEDICK RONALD A & MARY
1704364200700 R-2 S-C/R-2 DIEZ MIGUEL ALONSO
1704364200701 R-2 S-C/R-2 ALMAR LLC
1704364202702 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROBERTS AMY R
1704364202600 R-2 S-C/R-2 WILLETT BETTYE JANE
1704364202900 R-2 S-C/R-2 HALL COLLIN B
1704364202800 R-2 S-C/R-2 DREAMCRAFTERS LLC
1704364202400 R-2 S-C/R-2 POTTER MARILYN A TE
1704364200800 R-2 S-C/R-2 CABLE STEVEN P
1704364201000 R-2 S-C/R-2 LODGE CAROLYN S
1704364206600 R-2 S-C/R-2 RICE SANFORD D & MARILYN M
1704364207100 R-2 S-C/R-2 SCHMAEDICK MARY JO
1704364207200 R-2 S-C/R-2 STEVENS TUCK & W AL TER
1704364207900 R-2 S-C/R-2 ROWLES MARGARET MARY
1704364208000 R-2 S-C/R-2 MORAN MARK S & ELIZABETH
1704364208100 R-2 S-C/R-2 JOHNSTON RONALD D & MARIA T
1704364206700 R-2 S-C/R-2 SMYTHE ROBERTA L
1704364207300 R-2 S-C/R-2 REEVES BEVERLY JUNE
1704364208202 R-2 S-C/R-2 GRAHAM ROBERT D
1704364208201 R-2 S-C/R-2 SARIA BARBARA B
1704364206800 R-2 S-C/R-2 VOLK BRANDI N
1704364207400 R-2 S-C/R-2 BRIGGS JANET
1704364208203 R-2 S-C/R-2 GRAHAM ROBERT D
1704364208204 R-2 S-C/R-2 NEWHALL ELIZABETH P
1704364206900 R-2 S-C/R-2 BETTERTON LARRY R & TAMMY L
1704364207600 R-2 S-C/R-2 PROCRUSTEAN SOLUTIONS
1704364208400 R-2 S-C/R-2 TURNER PROPERTIES PTRSHP
1704364208500 R-2 S-C/R-2 HUFF DANILE & JULIE
1704364207700 R-2 S-C/R-2 BARLOW M B
1704364207000 R-2 S-C/R-2 SMITH CRAIG A
1704364207800 R-2 S-C/R-2 KEITH FAMILY TRUST 12-14-90
1704364208600 R-2 S-C/R-2 FUNKHOUSER LAURIE ANN