HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 19398i
5 ~ ~~
I
--:~}
ORDINANCE No. 3 9 8'
AN ORDINANCE ADAPTING AMENDMENTS To THE
EUGSNE-SPRINGFIELD METRaPOLITAN AREA GENERAL
PLAN.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
1. The E ugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
Metropol itan Plan} was adopted by the Eugene City Council on July
28, 1980 and amendments thereto were subsequently adopted on
February 8, 1 982 by Ordinance No. 19229, on octaber 22, 1984 by
Ordinance No. 19293, on July 17, 1985 by Ordinance No. 19341, on
September 9, 1985 by Ordinance No. 19348, and on April 23, 1986 by
Ordinance No. 19382.
2. Pursuant to ORS 197.640 to 197.650, the Eugene-
Springfield metropolitan area began a periodic review process in
February, 1985.
3. ORS 197.7122}4e} requires the development and adoption
of publlc facility plans for areas within urban growth boundaries
containing a population greater than 2,500 persons. This provi-
sion requires that public facility plans address the provision of
sanitary sewers, storm sewers, water systems and transportation
-.~~~~~ systems .
4. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation
Plan ~TransPlan} serves as the transportation element of the
Eugene~Springfield Metropolitan Area .public Facilities Plan
Public Facilities Plan}.
5. oRS 197.712 ~ 3 } requires that public facility plans
required by oRS 197.712 ~ 1 } ~ e } comply with the provisions of oRS
197.712 , by the first periodic review of the comprehensive plan and
regulations of applicable jurisdictions.
G. The Eugene City Council adapted the TransPlan on April
28, 1986 by Ordinance No. 19835.
7. The Eugene City Council adopted the Final Local Periodic
Review order far the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area on
August 13, 1986, by Resolution No. ~.
8. The Final Local Periodic Review Order far the Eugene
Springfield Metropolitan Area recommends that the Metro olitan
P
Plan be amended to bring the Plan into compliance with all appli~-
cable periodic review criteria of oRS 197.6403}.
9. The TransPlan and the Public Facilities Plan require
~~~~` ~~ policy revisions to the Metropolitan Plan.
-~-'Y T
Ordinance - 1
I ~
((~+
i~
a
lo. Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance which contains ~ y~`''
in leg a. s - ~:~~x.
lative format the revisions to the Metro olitan Plan is into -
p r r
porated herein as though fully set forth.
11. Findings in support of the revisions to the Metropolitan
Plan, as contained in Exhibit "A" to this Ordinance, are contained
in Exhibit "Bfl , Local Periodic Review order for the Eugene--
Springfield Metropolitan Area; Exhibit "C", TransPlan; and Exhibit
"D", Public Facilities Plan.
NQW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY 4F EUGEN$ DIES ORDAIN AS FoLLO~S:
Section 1. Based upon the above f indings, the f indings
contained in the amendments and supporting exhibits, and in the
original Metropolitan Plan, which are hereby adopted and incor-
porated herein by reference, the Metropolitan Area Plan is amended
according to the language contained in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held. in-
valid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,
such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent
provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the :.
remaining portions hereof . ~~ ~ ~.
Passed by the city Council this
Approved by the Mayor this
13th day of August, 1986
Ci Recorder
13th d o Au s , 986
~~ ~
Mayor
~. ..
...
;~_
Ord finance -- 2
~'~' E 1~'1 ~,,
~r ~~+~~
REVISIONS TO
LCDC PERIODIC REVIEW
METRO PLAN AMENDMENTS
Revise the list of LCDC Periodic Review Metro Plan amendments to include the
fallowing:
~. Amend Metro Plan Policy #19, Environmental Resources Element as follows:
Local governments shall develop policies and local controls for
protection and management of wetland areas by cam letion of the next
Metra P1 an UU a~date.
~. Add a new policy to the Parks Element as follows:
The City of Eugene shall cooperate with the University of aregon in
the resol ut~ on of any lass of recreati anal facilities associated
with development i n the Ri verf rant Park.
pl tbmpre
~.
t ,~
4
EXHIBIT A
J u ! y 14, ] 985
SUBJECT: LDCD PERIaDiC REVIEW METRO PLAN AMENDMENTS
During the Periodic Review process a set of Metro Plan amendments were enerate
9 d
primarily to ensure consistency among the Metro Plan, TransPlan, and the Public
Facility Plan. This document contains the amendments in le illative form:
additions and deletions g
[ ] Changes are based on the 1982 Plan, the 1984 and
1985 amendments as printed in November 1985, and the Mid-Periad Revie
w
amendments as the basis for these changes. ~On June 26, 1986, the Lane Council
of Governments Board ratified the Mid-Period Review amendments as ado ted b the
three local governments, P y
• Reorganize the Plan in conjunction to include four sections of the Plan whit
h
are most 1 i kely to change be separated into Append? ces A, B, C, and D as fol 1 owl:
Appendi x A -Public Faci 1 i ty Plan Pra j ect Lists and Maps
Mater, Storm Sewers, Sanitary Sewers and Transportation
Appendi x B -List of Refinement and Functional P1 ans and Ma
The ma would be a re ' ~ ~ ~ p
P v~ si on of exi sty ng Aux 1 ~ ary Map No. 4
Appendi x C -List of Except? on s and Maps
The maps would be the site specific maps from the working a ers
Pp
Appendi x D - Auxi 1 i ary Maps
The maps would be revisions of the existing Auxiliary Ma s with the
PFP services removed as ~ p
per Appendi x A
These Appendices will be published under se orate cover to facilit
p ate
reproduction on a routine basis. Future changes made to the text Burin the
semi-annual Metro Plan amendment rocess g
p can be handled by an insert,
Page lw1, Amend the second paragraph under "B. Purpose!', as fallaws;
The Plan is intended to designate a sufficient amount of urbanizable lan
d
to accommodate the need for further urban expansion, takin into account
the growth olio of the g
p y area to accommodate a population of 293,10x. The
Plan also identifes the major ublic facilities re wired to meet the la
use needs deli not - ~` - ~
..._. _____ ed within the urban rowth boundary.
Page l-1, amend the list by adding a new #11, as follows;
11. identifies the major trans ortation sanitar and storm sewer a
-~-..-- - _~ Y nd
water ro~ects needed to serve ~a futur
------ _. e o u l a t i o n o f 29 3 700 .
---
Page I -3, Add a new section titled "Appendices", and include the fallo in
w g
language;
1
There are four appendices to this Plan:
Appendi x A Public Faci 1 i ty Plan Project Lists and Maps for Water,
Storm Sewers, Sanitary Sewers and Transportation
Appendix B List of Refinement and Functional Plans and Map of
Refinement Plan Boundaries
Appendix C List. of Exceptions and Maps of Site Specific Exception
Area Boundaries .
Appendi x D Auxi 1 i ary Maps Showing the Fol 1 owl ng:
fire station l acati ons
solid waste site
electrical substations and transmission 1 i nes
airport zones
urban growth boundary
Greeni~ay boundary
school s
parks
Page i-4, "E. Relationship to Cther Plans and Policies", amend the first
paragraph as follows:
"....and it is important that it be [augmented su lemented by more
detailed refinement plans.....
Page l-~, Section H amend the title and substance of of this section as follows:
"Relationship to the Technical Sup lenient, ~and~ Working Papers, and
Public Facilities Plan Technical Re ort" .
...~
Combine paragraphs two and three of this section .
Page l-7', amend paragraph 3 as follows:
These findings, in turn, formed an important share of the basis for
updating the goals, objectives, and [recommendations of each of the 1990
General Plan el ements~ dal i c~ es i n this P
Page I -?, add a new paragraph, as follows:
The Public Faci 1 i ti es P1 an Technical Re~aort a1 so serves as a back round
information document su artin the Metropolitan Plan. The only ortions
of the Pub1i ~ ~ '""~ - ~ ~"
c Fac~l~t~es Plan which establish ublic olic are
_______
incorporated i n Metropoi_i tan P1 an of i cy and i n A endi x A.
~~ _
Page l-9, "General Findings", amend the second sentence of finding #Z as
follows
2. Such coordination can be enhanced through use of the Pu Faci 1 i ti es
. Plan and scheduling of priorities. ~ """""'°""~~
Section II-E, move Section $ "Exceptions" list ~~954 and X985 Plan Amendments)
to Appendix C, and add the fallowing sentence:
The 1 i st of exceptions and si to s eci f i c m_, aps, which are amendments to the
P_1an, are contained in Appendix C.
Page I1-E-11, Amended Section 8, "Exceptions" list, (1984 and 1985 Plan
Amendments3 should be amended to list another exception. This amendment to
the "Exceptions" list would be relocated in Appendix C along with all the
exceptions:
other exceptions
1. 6th-lth Avenue Extension from the urban rg awth boundary westward
to the P1 an Boundary.
Page 11-E-15 -Delete section #14. As part of the integration of the Public
Facilities Plan into the Metropolitan Plan and as part of the Mid-Period Review,
it was determined that future transportation facilities, like the other public
facilities, would not be shown on the Plan diagram.
[I4. Major Trans ortati on Corridors and Other Public Faci 1 i ti es
~.~____
Recognising the close interrelationship between transportation facilities
and land use, the major existing and planned streets and highways included
in the adopted Eugene-Springfield Area 2Cn0 Transportation Plan are shown
on the Plan diagram. ~
Rage II-E-16, "Plan Diagram Auxiliary Maps", move this section to Appendix D
and amend this section as follows:
In addition to the urban growth boundary, other factors are important as
they interface with land use patterns. They are illustrated on the four
fol 1 owl n "Plan Diagram Auxi 1 i ary Maps" and the Public Facility P1 an
ro~ect mays contained in A endix A. hand they] The auxiliary mays
include major ~uti 1 ity corridors, sewer .trunk 1 i nes, electr~i cal
substations, the boundaries of the Willamette River Greenway, and
identification of areas subject to neighborhood refinement or community
plans adopted subsequent to adoption of the 199a Plan in 1972. Areas far
which refinement plans are in process but not adopted in March 1982, are
also shaven on Auxiliary Map 4 ublic facilities and areas which affect
ur an develo ment. For trans ortation storm and sanitary sewer, water
facilities refer to A endix A. The eneral location of facilities shown
on the auxiliary maps is information which su orts the Metropolitan Plan
but does not establish up b~ic olicy. The eneral locations of the
foci 1 i ti es shown on these sma 11 scale mates are not intended to ref 1 ect the
reci se conf i urati on or 1 o ion of f aci 1 i i es which wi 1 l be determined
thrauc~h additional lann~ en ineeri~ studies roject desi~gn~ or
envy ronmental revs eve.
Move Auxiliary Map 4 to Appendix B. The list of refinement and functional plans
which support the Metropolitan Plan and the accompanying map showing
refinement plan boundaries will be included in Appendix B.
Delete the language describing the Street and Highway Network from the
auxiliary maps,
3
Items that will remain on the auxiliary maps in the appendices after PFP
information is removed, include:
- fire station location
- solid waste site
- electrical substations and transmission lines w
- airport pones
- Urban Growth Boundary
- Greenway boundary
- schools
- parks
• refinement plan boundaries in Appendix B
Page (I-E-23 Delete the reference to future streets and highways from the Plan
diagram.
Page 111-B-5, amend policy #15 as follows:
15. Encourage the development of transportation facilities which would
improve access to industrial and ~:ammercial areas and improve freight
movement capabilities by implemening the alicies d recommended]
projects i n the Eugene-Spry ngri eld Metro~p_o_l,,i tan Area ~ZOOa]
Transportation Plan TransPlan and therMahlon Sweet Field Master
Plan, as outlined i n Chapter 8~a}, "Qn Airport Land Use,"
Page III-C-11 Add a new policy #37 as follows:
37. Prior to the completion of the next Plan U..pdate, the air, water and
land resource ual ity of the metro of itan area will be reassessed.
Page I I ! -C-11 Add a new policy #38 as follows:
38. A metropo~itan~-wide inventory of naise_ sources and cam taints shall
be addressed du~~ ea h ~~P1 an U date and Periodic Review roc se s . . .
Page ! I 1-~ -11 Add a new poi icy #39 as follows
3g. Pry or to the cam letion of the next Phan Update, the Gaodpasture
island Gre t Blue Heronry shall be inventoried and assessed for its
s~c~n~f~cance as a Goal 5 resource. A Goal 5 ESEE analysis shall be
conducted, ~ f requi red. ~ ~ ~`~` - `~ ` ~`
Page Ill-d-5, add a new policy #13 as follows:
13. The ta_. ki n9 of an exce ti on shall be re ui red i f a nan--water-de endent
transportation facility re wires lacin of fill w~thin~~~ the
Willamette River Greenway setback. ~`
__.~__~
Page III-F-1, amend the second paragraph as follows:
The Eugene~Springfield Metrv olitan Area ~2o00~ Transportation Plan
TransPlan farms the basis for the surface transportation part of this
element in describing future needs for people and goods movement.
Projections of increased population and employment were translated into
trips through the transportation planning process. This forecasted demand
4
r
M
and other considerations, such as safety, served as the rationale for the
policies, facilities, and services contained in TransPlan the
Transportation Plan]. TransPlan The Transportation Plan] also outlines
specific transportation goals, objectives and policies ~, and
recommendations] necessary to meet metropolitan transportation needs for a
o ul ati on of 293, 704 through the year 2400] .
Page 1 # 1-F-1, replace the second paragraph with the following;
The Eu ene-S rin field Metro olitan Bikeway Master Plan serves as the
basis far the metropolitan bikeway needs in the area. Originally adopted
in 1975, this plan needs to be updated to reflect the substantial bikeway
improvements made since 1915, to resolve some conflicts with the
Transportation Plan, and to respond tv continued community interest in
bicycling.]
TransPlan contains a metropolitan scale bicycle element which re laces the
1975~~~Eu ene~-S rin f i e~ d Metro of ~ tan Bikeway Master Plan .
Page 111-F-2- The following findings should be amended to reflect changes to T-
. zooo, the Bikeway Master Plan and the emphasis on a population bevel rather
than a f utu re year
Findin s;
1Z. A number of the policies contained in the Eugene-Springfield
Metro~o~ i tan Area X2000] Transportati an Plan TransPlan are directed
toward increasing the efficiency of existing transportation systems.
15.. Local [and metropolitan] bikeway plans have been adopted which
outline the future needs of the metropolitan area. Metro olitan
bikeway needs are contained i n TransPlan .
1 7, Current levels of local, state, and federal funding are inadequate to
meet the surface transportation needs forecasted for the future
o ulation of Z93_,70a~ X2000.]
~15. TransPlan meets all the S ublic facilit tannin requirements
wi th~~~ the exce ti on of a eneral condition assessment wh~~ch _,.~.~.i s
..~ ____
cvntai ned i n the Publ i c Faci 1 iti es P1 an Technical Re ort.
Renumber the remaining findings accordingly.
Page III-F-3, amend finding #22 to be consistent with Lane Countyts Rural
Comprehensive Plan:
2Z. 1n addition to the General Plan and the Mahlon Sweet Field Master
Plan, Lane County's General [Willamette-Long Tom Subarea] Plan
affects the land uses within the airport environs within
approximately five miles of the airport proper} .
Page Ill-F-4, amend policy #1 to delete. reference to T-ZOOO and the Bikeway
Master Plan and replace with reference to TransPlan;
5
1. The goals, objectives policies, ~recommendativns,] and ~proposed~
facilities and services contained in the adopted Eugene~-Springfield
Metropolitan Area [2000 Transportation Plan TransPlan~ hand the
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Bikeway Master Plan] shall serve as
the basis for guiding surface transportation improvements in the
metropolitan area. TransPlan i s ado ted as up bl ~c o_P 1 icy by reference
i n thi s Plan, but s,pec~ fical ly excluded as ubl i c of i cy ~ the
following: hasin cat estimates, and raject justification
contained in the raject lists and the Financial Section Ix Those
arts of TransPlan are informational only and are not ado ted as
of i cy i n TransPl an or by reference i n this Plan . ~`
Page I ! ! ~ F-5, amend policy #fi to delete reference to T-2aD0 and replace it with
reference to TransPlan:
6 . Because i t i s recognized [, ~ that the Eugene-Springfield Metro~pol i tan
Area [2000 Transportation Plan TransPlan is a component of this
Metropolitan Area General Plan, TransPlan the Transportation Plan
should be evaluated and revised, if necessary, to maintain
consistency and assure transportation facilities are available to
serve 1 and uses included i n the Metropolitan Area General Plan .
Page f f f-F-fi, amend policy #l5 as follows:
~5. The City of Eugene and Lane County shall adapt] maintain up-to-date
airport safety ordinances whi c~h regulate the height of structures,
electromagnetic and/or visual i nterference with aircraft, and other
hazards to airport safety.
Page f f l-G~~, defete the final sentence from the second paragraph, and add the
folfowing paragraphs:
~n ~an~ing and ro rammin for ublic .utilities, services, a d
fac~l~t7es, resent and near future needs of the metr~~oolitan area should
be t ~ n a coord~ Hated manna„r, reco n~ zi n~the 1 ong- berm, ul t~mate needs
d service area. This metro~litan-wide coo eration i rs effected in the
State mandated Public Facilities Plan. Major u~ biic facilities from the
Public Facilities Plan are incor orated as Plan op licy in Appendix A.
Generally, constructi yn of ro je is i s based won the hasi n orti an of
the Public Facilities Plante but actual decisions on timin and financin
are controlled solely by the ca ital imQrov,e,ments ro rammin and bu, dget
rocesses of individual jurisdictions.
Amendments to either the ro ject 1 i sts or mays i n A endi x A are amendments
tv th s Plan and re uire simultaneous amendments to this Plan and to
affected functional fans. Chan es to the hasin cost estimates and
raject justification will be made from time to time in conjunction with
the semi-annual amendment and u_~pdate rocesses; th so e changes can be made
throw h the bud etin and ca ital im~rovemen rocesses d do not
necessitate amendments to TransPlan or the Metro olitan Plan, Because the
Public Facilities Plan Technical Report is a background document and all
ubicl op icy as acts are incar orated directly into the Metro olitan
an , chap es to the Public Faci l i t~i es Plan Technical Report can occur at~ a
~. w_r_.~___
1 ater time duri ~~ semi -annual amendment d u date processes ~ ~-
6
'~ T
Y
Page Ill-G-3, add a new finding #~8, as follows:
1$. State 1 aw re ui res dev_el o_pment of a Public Faci 1 i ti es P1 an
to coordinate im lamentation of farmed Ovate sanitary sewer storm
sewer and transportation rejects.
Page 111-G-6, add a new policy #18, as follows:
~$. The water, sanitary and storm sewer sections of the Metro olitan
Pu Faci 1 i ti es Phan shahserve as the basis for uidi n water
sanitary d storm sewer i m rovements i n the metropolitan re ion .
_. ..~..
Page 111-G-fi, add a new policy #19, as follows:
~9. Additions to or deletions from the roject 1 i st or si n~ i ficant ch_._ an9e
to roject 1 ocati on requires amendi n the Pu~ b1~i c Facilities P1 an .
Page III-G-fi, add a new policy #~a, as follows;
~0. Chan es to roject hasin schedules or antici ated costs and
• financin shah be made in accordance with budgeter and ca ital
i m rovement ro ram rocedures of the affected jurisdictions .
Page 1 ! 1-~-~, add a new policy #2~ , as follows:
Z1. Project ti. ~min9 and financ__n9 modifications do not require amendment
of the Public Facilities Plan. Modifications should be reflected in
the Public Facilities P~ an at the next re ul ar1 schedul ed u date .
..r_ ~.
. Page III-G-6, add a new policy #22, as follows:
ZZ. Both t~.mi ng and financin rovi si ons for ubl i c foci 1 i ti es are not
considered land use decisions, and then fore, cannot be the basis of
meal i n accordance with State 1 aw.
Page 1 I 1-G-6, add a new policy #~3, as follows;
Z3. Pr__ i or to the cympl,eti on of the next P1 an Update, the Lane Cou~nty_ Sow d
Waste Management Pi an shall be revised to reflect the _requi rements of
the Re~~ q ortunity Act and than es in the inventory of~~~~olid
waste sources and sites , ~ ~" ~"'
p 1 tbp ram
1