HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance No. 19474ORDINANCE N0. ~ql~,~
AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING ASSESSMENTS FOR PAVING ON ROOSEVELT
' BOULEVARD FROM BERTELSEN ROAD TO BELTLINE ROAD; AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 19295, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
On November 1.9,.1984, there was passed by the Council and approved by the
Mayor, Ordinance No. 19295, levying an estimated assessment against the
properties listed on the Assessment Roll attached thereto for paving on
Roosevelt Boulevard from Bertelsen Raad to Beltline Road.
Final costs of the project have been calculated, and pursuant to the
provisions of Section 7.240 of the Eugene Code, 1971, the assessment roll
attached to Ordinance No. 19295 should be amended to reflect the reduced
assessments for the assessment accounts.
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 7.240 of the Eugene
Code, 1971, Ordinance No. 19295 passed by the Council and approved by the Mayor
an November 19, 1984, is hereby amended by correcting the Assessment Roll
attached hereto to reflect the reduced assessments for the remaining accounts
listed thereon.
Section 2. The finance officer is directed to make the above corrections
to the docket of city liens and to send a corrected notice of assessment to the
property owners set forth in Section 1 above.
Section 3. Except as herein specifically amended, all other provisions of
Ordinance No. 19295 and the assessments provided for therein remain in full
force and effect.
Section 4. It is necessary that the above corrections be made as scan as
possible, and therefore, an emergency is hereby declared to exist, and this
Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage by the City Council
and approval by the Mayor.
Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this
~~~~ y of May , 1987. 11 day of Ma 1987.
ity Recorder Mayor
::; ,
ORDINANCE NO, _ -~
AN ORDNANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR PAVING OF ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD FROM BERTELSEN
ROAD TO BELTLINE ROAD.
in the City of Eugene, Lane County, Oregon.
RECITALS
The City Counci 1 of the City of Eugene did by Resal uti on No. 38~, adopted March 14
19 $4 ,determine to PAVE ROOSEVELT BOULEVARD FROM BERTELSEN ROAD TO BELTLINE ROAD.
The ~ity Council authorized the execution of a contract for the. construction of the local
improvements an MAY 16 , 19~,,;
The estimated cost thereof is ascertained, and the initial amount to be assessed in accordance
with applicable provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971 has been determined to be,
Item 1. Assessable portion Contract # 84-500 S 133,144.70
of State contract contract #
Item 2. Maintenance Retainage
Item 3. Other Costs Describe)
Item 4. Deferred Assessments (Type) $ 159,173.65
Item 5. Amount of Remaining Warrants Issued to Complete Contract
Item 6. Estimated amount for Contract #84-500 ~ ~ 133,144.70
Item 7. Less - City's Share of Cost far Completed Contract
Item a, Plus -
a, DUE TO WARRANT REDEMPTION FUND
Item 9, amount to Which City Charges are applied 133,144.70
Item lD. Plus -Unpaid Balance of City`s Share See Item 24 Below)
Item 11. Lets - Liquidated Damages
Item 12. Less -Other Casts Describe) Assessable portion 133,144,70
of State contract
Item 13. Plus = Overpayment to Contractor by Warrant - --
Item 19~. ASSESSMENT WORK IN PROCESS $ 0.00
Item 15. Plus - Overpayment to Contractor in Cash
Item 16. P1 us - 15~ City Charge far Engineering 19, 971.71
. Plus - 5~ Ci t.Y Charge far Internal Service 6, 657 , 24
Plus - ,~Jarrant Interest Charge
$ 26,628.95
a, DUE TO WARRANT REDEMPTION FUND
26,628.95
Item 17. Plus - DUE TO 5EWER UTILITY for l/2~ SPECIAL 5EWER LEVY
Item 18. Plus - DUE TD SEWER UTILITY .for Lateral Sewer
Equivalent of Trunk Sewer System
Item 19. Plus - DUE TO WARRANT REDEMPTION FUND for Engineering
Charges on City's Share of Costs
Item 20. Plus - Other Costs Describe) Assessable portion $ 133,44.70
of State Contract
Item 21, Plus _ Liquidated Damages
Item 22. Less - DUE FROM CONTRACTOR far Overpayment
$ 159,773.65
Item 23, M RECEIVABLE - TOTAL •INITIAL ASSESSMENTS
INITIAL ASSESS ENT
per Ordinance
Item 24, Ci : 's Share of Cost for Cary leted Contract: ,
' Account Contract
Eng'r, Cost
TOTAL ~,
~~a.
., ,. .. ,
p.W,ENGR,ADM D7O 1/$~
~~. '?: ..
`
°~ ;
:'~': R~ ~;~~
..., ~
~ .. ,.
V~ J
~~:~
-?~ ~
'
~~ ..:.
.,
~3} " E
~~
,~
i"•.!
`v'
r
~~~
~'"
P
-
~~~
'-~'~'
~~.'.
' ~ !:.
I ~ ~'
~R~ !'^; a ~~~
~ ~ i!~l
f.~ ~•f
~ ~ r
I g-
,;y~
~;;t" t~`
~~~, ~'" -
~{:
~,:.~.
~:'~ f f
ye
~
r
.~
~" ~ _
k~ C,i~.
~~ ~ ~~
~~, ~,
_~, 4~
~-a
f r1 ~„ b~ ~,~ '~~ t~w
J'7 f'"`~ ! kj
%;J ifi'• R ~,r
ill ~r s~ %~,~ ~ '
~.~ ~:J G:~, R,~ t;-~ C~:
~.~? ~
1,.1I r~" ~ w~
~l
T~^y ~.~
~~
~~
c~,,9
t^+ ~:~:
r~~ ~!tE
1
r
~
4d ~~Y.
(~ ~k
`~~ 1
om
~ ..
t
.
\~ ~ \~
~~
_ [~
~`
``~ y
{
~
'..
r,
rr
;~,
S~.w
~~
~
1
~~
~~~ µ
j
•
~g. ~ ~^^
4.~,
. ~_~
`
~~ * IF~A
(t
, .
y~
any ~.~~ Gar
r
. .
~~~ ~jry
~~ ~ ~,~,
'' ~ :;.
;;' ;,
c `;
~ ,. ,.
.
;> ..
,°;
'~
~~ .. >
sir ~;:,
~ ~ ~w~:
t ;:
t ~3 .
i,i
"~
~~.~
'?
~~
r:;; ~~
<.
«~,
„z
~~~ ~` '
~t
-
t~
~:~
~''
C"'
~~
M~
~~
Rw
7
~~- C;
~~
4 44 ~ ~ !! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p
f'~', _ ~
;~ ~ ~
~
m. (~
~
~. ~
p ~.,
R,~
o-~ ,~„~
r,~ 1.~'~ t,l.l ...~` ~~ 1~~ lad ~° ",~' ~~ ,~-
`~ ~~`+ ~ ` cn ~ ~ C'~
~~t t ~ ~# ~? ~ ~ y
~sl
~~
~'