The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutOrdinance No. 20360 ORDINANCE NO. 20360 AN ORDINANCE LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTING OF ALLEY PAVING LOCATED IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD GENERALLY BOUNDED BYWILLAMETTE STREET, II.. AVENUE, KINCAID STREET, AND FRANKLIN BOULEVARD; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. (CONTRACT 2005-28, 2005-29, AND 2005-30) (JOB # 4309, 4310, AND 4172) The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: A. On the 12th day of January, 2004, the City Council, by motion duly passed, initiated the proposed local improvements consisting of alley paving located in the West University Neighborhood generally bounded by Willamette Street, 19th Avenue, Kincaid Street, and Franklin Boulevard. B. After due notice and a public hearing before the hearing official on April 20, 2005, the City Council formed the Local Improvement District and authorized construction of the local im- provements on the 9th day of May, 2005. c. The actual cost of the local improvements is ascertained to be $1,851,144.98, and the amounts to be assessed to, and borne by, the specially benefitted property, and to be borne by the City or others, have been determined in accordance with applicable provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971 (UE.C."), as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. D. The City Council has established the method of calculating local improvement assessments in E.C. 7.170 and 7.175. E. A public hearing on the ordinance, as required by Section 28(2) of the Eugene Charter of2002, was scheduled before the hearing official as authorized by Section 2.007(4) of the Eugene Code, 1971, on January 30, 2006. At least ten days prior to the scheduled public hearing before the hearing official, a notice containing the information required by E.C. 7.185 was posted on a public bulletin board at City Hall and given by certified mail to the owners of the parcels of real property subject to the assessment. At the time and place specified therein, the hearings official considered the assessment report of the City Engineer and Finance Officer and the testimony and evidence presented at the hearing. F. At least ten working days prior to the Council meeting, notice of the Council's consideration of this Ordinance"was published in the Register Guard, and the Ordinance was posted on the City's web site on the same date, as required by Section 28(1) of the Eugene Charter of2002. G The Council has reviewed and considered the assessment report of the City Engineer and Finance Officer and the hearings official's findings and summary, and based thereon, Ordinance - 1 THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The hearings official's summary is hereby made a part of the Council's record in these proceedings, and the hearings official's findings, including those regarding compliance with E.C. 7.160 to 7.190, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby adopted. Section 2. The actual assessable cost of the local improvements consisting of alley paving located in the West University Neighborhood generally bounded by Willamette Street, 19th Avenue, Kincaid Street is $1,752,827.44 which is hereby assessed against the parcels of property hereinafter described in the amounts set opposite, respectively. Section 3. The City Council does hereby determine and assess each lot and part of lot within the described local improvement district as set forth on the assessment roll attached as Exhibit C hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which includes those properties whose owners qualified for the Street Subsidy Program. Section 4. The City Council does hereby determine that each parcel of land or lot herein above described is specially benefitted to the extent of the assessment set forth. The Finance Officer shall give notice of the assessments to the owners of the assessed parcels advising them the assessment may be paid in full, without interest, within ten days of the effective date of this ordinance. Assessments that remain unpaid after the ten day period are declared to be liens upon the respective lots, parts of lots or parcels of land against which said several amounts are assessed, and may be paid, with interest on the unpaid principal amount commencing ten days after the effective date of this ordinance: 4.1 In up to twenty semi-annual installments, including principal and interest at the rate set by the City Manager as provided in E.C. 2.022 through 2.024. 4.2 If the property owner so elects, in 120 monthly installments, including principal and interest at the rate set by the City Manager as provided in E.C. 2.022 through 2.024 plus a service charge determined by the City Manager as provided in E.C. 2.020. Section 5. The City Recorder is directed to enter in the docket of City Liens a statement in connection with each unpaid assessment containing the following: 5.1 A description of each lot, part of lot or acreage specially benefitted by the local improvements; 5.2 The name of the owner or reputed owner thereof, or that the name of the owner is unknown; and 5.3 The sum assessed upon said property, the amount and date from which interest accrues, and the date of entering the same in the docket of City Liens. Section 6. Upon enactment of this ordinance, the City Finance Officer shall send notice of the assessments by first class mail to the owners of the assessed parcels containing the information required by E. C. 7.190 and enclose therewith an app lication for paying the assessment in installments according to the terms set fort.h in Section 4 of this ordinance. Ordinance - 2 Section 7. Any assessment remaining unpaid and for which no application for installment payments has been received may be foreclosed as provided by law. The proceeds from the payment or foreclosure of assessments levied by this ordinance shall be deposited to the city funds which advanced the cost of construction, engineering and related expenses or which are used to retire any indebtedness incurred by the City for these improvements. Section 8. An immediate effective date of this Ordinance is necessary to allow the City to begin immediate collection of the assessments that will be used to pay the obligations the City has incurred for this project. Enabling the City to begin collecting assessments will avoid increased interest costs and conserve limited City resources. Therefore, this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage by the City Council and approval by the Mayor, retention by the Mayor for more than ten days, or readoption over a Mayoral veto by two-thirds of all members of the City Council. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this 13th day of February, 2006. >' < 1~~' ~ ;.0:.. _ ;' ; :'", ~~,~, ; . !, \:' : ,:~ : ;: '" :,-< J:c, ;...,~ - -~ /. - ~ -- "', '; ,,:':; . 'j:'< ;; ,:~ :';:' ~.~;. :' .~; '~':"'~". - - - ~ - - -- ,_,',::' ~:" ,:~/:,_~;~- U"- ,',,: - -- - . Ordinance - 3 CITY OF EUGENE (PROD) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM EXHIBIT A 93004172 .. 'NEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS PROJECT LEGAL: ALLEY PAVING LOCATED IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD GENERALLY BOUNDED BY WILLAMETTE STREET, 19TH AVENUE, KINCAID STREET, AND FRANKLIN BOULEVARD CONTRACT NUMBER: 2005-00030 JOB NUMBER: 93004172 ASSESSABLE: ASSBSSABLB TOTALS: 160 PENDING o ON HOLD o LIEN DEFERRED 160 CITY SHARE: CITY PAVING CITY SANITARY CITY STORM LOW INCOME SUBS IDY CITY SHARE TOTALS: $98,31.7.5( TOTAL COST OP PROJBCT: $1,851,144.98 -Qi... EXHIBIT B FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUBJECT: PROPOSED FINAL ASSESSMENT FOR IMPROVEMENTS CONSISTING OF ALLEY PAVING LOCATED IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD GENERALLY BOUNDED BY WILLAMEITE STREET, 19TH AVENUE, KINCAID STREET, AND FRANKLIN BOULEVARD (CONTRACT 2005-30, 2005-29, AND 2005-28) (JOB #4172,4310 AND 4309) BACKGROUND The West University Neighborhood area, generally bounded by WiIlamette Street, 19th Avenue, Kincaid Street, and Franklin Boulevard, is adjacent to downtown and is the City's most densely populated neighborhood. The alleys of the West University Area are an important element in the character of the area. Some businesses in effect front on the alleys, and numerous residences of both single and multi-family character use the alleys as the primary means of access. Due to an increase in criminal activity and nuisance behaviors in the last few years, the riot of 2002, and concerns about the decline in appearance of the area, former Eugene Mayor Jim Torrey and University of Oregon President Dave Frohnmayer formed the West University Neighborhood (WUN) Task Force to develop immediate and long-term solutions to the safety and livability issues facing the area. The task force was comprised of neighborhood stakeholders, such as residents, local business owners, and non-profit organizations. Representatives from the Eugene City Council, Planning Commission, Police Commission, and the Associated Students of the University of Oregon were also included, as was staff from the City and University. The meetings were open to the public and run in an informal manner to invite broad participation by other interested members of the public. One outcome of the West University Neighborhood Task Force was an evaluation of needed improvements to reverse negative trends in the area. The Task Force identified the unimproved or deteriorated condition of some of the area's alleys as a part of the problem. One of the high priority recommendations of the Task Force Report was improvements to those aIIeys in the neighborhood that were deteriorated below standards. The Eugene City Council received the Task Force Report and held several work sessions on the recommendations. One of the outcomes was a series of actions regarding alley improvements. The City Council held a work session on November 24, 2003 to review a report from the City Engineer covering feasibility and estimated cost to improve the unimproved alleys, funding sources, possible assessments, assessment code issues, design standards, timing and a proposed implementation plan. City Council directed staff to proceed with the implementation plan to improve the unimproved alleys, and to pursue other potential additional funding sources to replace Community Development Block Grant monies for the non-assessable costs~o~ improvements. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 1 --=- ----=--=-- --=---=----- =- -~ - -- ~ -= - - - - - -- --- - =- ---=--=-- -=---=-- -- -=- -- - -- ~ - ~ -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~- -=---- --- -- - ~ =--=--=-- =:----==--=-- -===---=-~ On January 12, 2004, City Council adopted a motion directing staff to proceed with design and bidding of a project to improve the unimproved alleys within the WUN. On March 8, 2004 City Council held a work session on proposed changes to the assessment code pertaining to alleys. On Apri112, 2004, a public hearing was held before the City Council on proposed changes to the assessment code pertaining to alleys. Various assessment methods were considered using examples which showed the financial impact of each method to properties on the West University Alleys. On May 24, 2004 City Council took final action approving changes to the assessment code pertaining to alleys. The 23 alleys in the WUN Local Improvement District were separated into three bidding contracts. The low bidders were 2G Construction for Job #4172, & Job #4310 and Brown Contracting Job #4309. Property owners were notified of a public hearing regarding formation of the proposed LID and the public hearing was held on April 20, 2005. The City formed the Local Improvement District (LID) on May 9, 2005. Construction of the project has been completed, final actual costs have been tabulated, and final assessment costs have been calculated. The property owners were notified of the proposed assessments and the pending assessment hearing ten (10) days prior to the hearing. PRO.TEeT There are 23 alleys in the project. The total length of the alley frontage is approximately 6,300 linear feet. There are 160 tax lots that front the alleys. The City design standards were used to improve the alleys; to develop all deteriorated alleys in the project area to a standard 14-foot wide concrete alley including catch basins and piping from catch basins to the City stormwater system. ASSESSMENTS In accordance with the Eugene Code, each alley block is considered as a separate element of the project. The cost for each block is calculated separately and the properties along the alley are subject to assessment based on the characteristics of the property. During initial consideration of the issues that led to this project, the Council examined the Eugene Code and made changes to the alley assessment provisions. The assessable cost for each alley is calculated and then one half of the assessable costs are apportioned to the properties based on their front footage abutting the alleys, and one half of the assessable costs are apportioned to the properties based on the area of the properties within 160 feet of the alley. The assessable front foot costs are calculated based on the existing use of each parcel. The assessable area costs are based on the most intensive use allowed under the property's zoning. Weighting factors were applied to the front footage and area of each property depending on the use and zoning of the property. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 2 -- . - Single family dwelling or duplex Other residential Commercial or General Office Industrial Other 1.0 3.0 10.0 10.0 1.0-10.0* * According to the most intensive use of the parcel most comparable to the use listed above as determined by the city engineer. The Eugene Code calls for the costs of alley construction to be assessed to the property abutting the alleys. Estimated Costs Based on the low bids received, the Engineer estimated the costs of the project to be: Estimated Total Assessable Cost Estimated Total City Cost $1,670,779 $ 3,670 Estimated Total Project Cost $1,674,449 Actual Costs. The final actual costs were higher than the estimated costs. Total Assessable Cost Non-assessable City Cost Total Project Cost $1,852,322 The non-assessable City share for this project is funded from Transportation Utility Fund, Stormwater Utility Fund and Wastewater Utility Fund in the amount of $63,720. The Transportation Utility Fund portion is $24,961 and included repair of several existing alley driveways and street pavement preservation work. The Stormwater Utility Fund amount is $18,453 and included repair of existing stormwater systems. The work funded by the Wastewater Utility Fund cost $20,306 and included repair to existing wastewater systems. The final project costs were higher than estimated. This was due to higher staff costs than expected for engineering and public involvement. Also, there were additional construction costs for overexcavation to stabilize the base prior to paving, extra tree preservation work, unexpected underground utility conflicts and additional repair work to existing pavements, the storm drain system and the wastewater system. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 3 Adiustments After the proposed assessments were prepared, the City engineering staff received numerous petitions requesting that the proposed assessments be adjusted. Three of the petitions concerned the area calculation, and offered proof that the area of the parcel in question had changed since the City compiled its information. The City Engineer proposes modification of the proposed assessment to correctly reflect the current property area. To avoid having to recalculate all the assessments, the City Engineer recommends that the difference be absorbed by the city. The Hearings Officer concurs with this recommendation. The Eugene Code specifies a series of weighting factors and includes a grant of discretion to the City Engineer to determine the most appropriate weighting factor for property other than residential, commercial or industrial by use or zoning. Several petitions or requests were submitted to the City Engineer, requesting a different weighting factor be applied. One petition concerned a difference in use, where the property had been weighted based on the assumption that it was a commercial use. When evidence was supplied that it was actually used primarily as a residence, the City Engineer determined that it was appropriate to recalculate the weighting assigned under the use category for the front footage component of the assessment (but not the area - zoning calculation). This determination appears to be a valid exercise of the City Engineer's authority, and the hearings officer supports the City Engineer's determination that the assessment be recalculated, and that the different costs be absorbed by the City. A number of other petitions were submitted, seeking a change in the applicable weighting factors. The most common request was for property owned by non-profit organizations to be given a lesser weighting than otherwise similar for-profit commercial property. The City Engineer determined that the Code did not allow such a distinction because the Code speaks only of a general zoning category, where there is no distinction between non-profit and for-profit commercial uses. This is a determination by the City Engineer that he lacks the authority under the code to go beyond the actual categories set forth in the code; that is, that his authority extends only to categories of use that do not fit within the categories listed. This reasonable interpretation was, at lest implicitly, confirmed by the Council in this case when it had before it the proposed formation of this local improvement district and the request by the Garden Club to be reclassified because of their non-profit status. The Council's intent on this is also demonstrated by the fact that when they were considering the adopted code language they also had before detailed illustrations of how the proposed code language would apply to the West University Neighborhood PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public involvement in this project has been extensive. The project originated with the West University Neighborhood Task Force. The Council has also been extensively involved in both the evaluation of the Task Force Report, and in work sessions considering the Code, and LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 4 initiation of the project. This public involvement included decisions on which alleys needed attention. The public involvement continued with a well attended public hearing leading to the formation of the local improvement district. Public involvement continued, and has culminated in a well attended public hearing on the proposed assessments. Minutes of that meeting are to be found in the attached Exhibit A. While the members of the public who appeared at the public hearing described in Exhibit A objected to at least a portion of the assessment proposed for their property, few expressed any doubts about the need for the alley improvements. A few members of the public who appeared suggested that, rather than their property being assessed the entire cost of the improvements, the City should pay a portion of the costs of the improvements. Most of the arguments suggesting that the City pay some of the costs focused on the allegation that the improvements were motivated by the need to correct problems leading to and associated with civil unrest in the area. These property owners argued that, because the motive behind the improvement was to address a problem that concerned either the entire neighborhood or the City as a whole, the costs of the improvements should be shared more broadly. The allocation of the benefits of a public improvement is a difficult policy decision, one that the Council must make. In this case the Council was responding to the civil problems in the West University Neighborhood when it examined alley assessments and established the current policy. After discussing the improvements needed in the West University Neighborhood, the Council looked at the Code policies and made it even more clear that adjacent property owners were to pay the entire cost of the alley assessments. It is difficult to imagine a more clear affirmation that the present assessments reflect Council policy. Calculating and assigning benefits looks at tangible matters such as present and future use of the public improvement. But it also looks at other, less easily measured elements of the overall benefit of a public improvement. The question is not whether others might benefit from a public improvement, the question that the Council must decide is whether the benefits received by the properties to be assessed are reflected in the assessments they receive - whether the properties to be assessed are sufficiently benefited to justify the assessable costs levied on them. Of course the public in general benefits from public improvement projects, that is why the projects are initiated as a public improvement. There are many public improvement projects where there are no assessments levied. This is no doubt in part because of a determination that no particular property benefits more than any other property. Where it is possible to identify properties that do benefit more than the general run, then it is possible to consider assessing these properties. In the case of the alley improvements, it is true that the West University Ta~k Force recommended alley improvements because this would help address problems of the West University area as a whole. The problem of unrest in the area was one important factor, although not the only one. Certainly the neighborhood and the City can benefit from improvements that are designed to lessen the risk of unrest. But who among all the property owners in the City are LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 5 the first and primary beneficiaries of actions that reduce the likelihood of civil unrest taking place in the West University alleys? As a part of the extensive evaluation of the proposed improvements that led to this point of final assessment, the Council several times affirmed its judgment that the primary beneficiaries would be the property owners along the alleys. There were many requests to look at individual cases, and arguments that others might use the alleys more than the property owners making the argument. The City Charter requires that assessment policy be set by a general ordinance. A case-by-case analysis of benefit based on use would not only be impractical, it would be impermissible under the Eugene Charter and Code. The Code assigns costs based on the Council's decision about benefits, which presumably includes easily measurable and less easily measurable benefits. The only discretion left with regard to alley assessments is the determination as to which of several categories any individual property best fits. The major change in the code leading up to the assessment for the alley project was a reduction in the number of categories available. While other allegations were, incorrectly, raised concerning Constitutional violations, a Constitutional violation would be more likely if there were unfettered discretion to consider each property on its own merits, or perceived lack of merit. Beginning with a decision by the Council that the primary beneficiaries of alley improvements are the adjacent property owners, the policy directives lead to this point where the question before the Council is whether the benefits of this improvement are assessable to these property owners under current policy. Because the current policy was set after considerable examination of the conditions and implications of needed improvements in the West University Area, it seems clear that the proposed assessments are a valid implementation of the Eugene Code. Several property owners challenged the methodology of assessing costs. It was suggested that some of the costs should not have been included because they could not be characterized as "actual costs" which are the only types of costs allowed by the Oregon Constitution. The costs challenged included the engineering costs and the administrative costs. Actual costs are costs actually incurred in the process of making the improvement, and that is all that has been included in these proposed assessments. Some questioned the validity of including those engineering costs which occurred before the Council approved the local improvement district. If one examines the totality of the improvement process, one can see that it would be inappropriate to not include these costs. Improvements are constructed mainly by private contractors who bid for the opportunity to do the work. The opening of the bids is the event that initiates the local improvement district, but it is not the first work involved in the project. Before the bidding is possible, design work must be done, so that there is something upon which the bids can be based. The work by the City engineers to prepare the design for the bidding is a necessary and direct expense of the improvement project, because, without this work there would be no improvement project at alL The Eugene Code documents this logic. Section 7.170 of the Eugene Code provides that the includable direct costs extend to engineering costs. The practice of allocating costs to projects LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 6 ~==.--~ - --=-----===.--=-- --=-=---=-- --====---===-- ==::::::;;.. -~------=- =-------=-~ =---=- -=--=-=----~ --==----==- -------------- ----=-=- ~ -~- =---- - ---=--=----------=-- -- - ~ ---=-- - - - -- - - ~- - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - - --- -- - -= - - ~--= - ~----=-- ----= __ ~ _ _ _ ~~ _ -=- = ~ "-----L.. __=--- _ _.~ __ _ -=------ _ _ ____-__ according to the work performed to further the project is the standard practice within the City's engineering section, and it has withstood independent examination in the past. There is no reason to suspect that it was done in anything less than a completely professional manner in this project. Another property owner questioned the legitimacy of using the engineering costs set by the City Manager's administrative order. Establishing costs for City services by consideration of the factors that the City Manager used in establishing the engineering costs is a standard procedure. In any large organization, there are other costs for personnel besides the salary or wages paid to the person. It is legitimate to include these costs, because they are costs to the City for the engineering services provided by City personnel, and that is the purpose of the City Manager's order. It makes no difference that the administrative order discusses charges for private improvements. The City cannot charge different rates for the engineering services it provides to private individuals than it charges to itself. The final challenge to included costs was a challenge to the City's inclusion of administrative costs, which are calculated by using a standard five percent of the other costs. These administrative costs are actual costs of the improvement. They are costs that are difficult to calculate during the implementation of the project, since they include costs which are not finally capable of being calculated until the project is completed and the assessments are levied. Rather than increasing the cost by delaying the assessment until all these costs are fixed, the City has chosen the process of calculating a standard cost for these elements, and assigning that standard to each project. Since this calculation is based on a large number of projects, the five percent standard is a reflection of the experience and is the best reflection possible of actual costs. There is no better available means to calculate these costs. The method reflects, with the accuracy of experience, actual costs of the improvement project. To exclude these costs would be inappropriate, because it would mean excluding actual costs of the project. All of these costs, engineering and administrative and similar costs, are what some objectors referred to as "soft" costs, as opposed to the "hard costs" reflecting the payments made to the construction contractors. Nothing in the Constitutional limits on assessments, or state laws or the Eugene Code makes a distinction between "hard" and "soft" costs. Both types of costs exist because they are actual costs, without which the project would not be accomplished. The Eugene Code clearly establishes that all actual costs, hard and soft, should be included in the assessment. The final argument raised by property owners concerned a challenge to the timing of the charges included in the assessment. The Eugene Charter provides that amendments to Eugene's assessment ordinances go into effect six months after adoption, and can apply only to improvements authorized by the Council after the effective date of the amendments. The Council was careful of its timing when it began its progress toward completing the alley improvements. As it first considered proposed amendments to the assessment ordinance, the necessary procedures and time limits to accomplish the West University alley improvements were laid before the Council, and the Council took pains to act appropriately within the time LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 7 limits set by the Charter. There is an established process regarding the development of any improvement undertaken by the City. Council initiation is always the first step. As discussed above, the first stage is to have the Council designate the project as appropriate for initial development. That allows the Engineer to begin design of the project. Only after the project is designed and the costs are estimated, does the question of its categorization as a public improvement subject to assessment come into play. Not all projects that involve public improvements are of a type where the Council chooses to make the project into one where assessments are levied. If the Engineer determines that the project is appropriate for the Council's consideration as a public improvement subject to assessment, the Engineer will initiate the process that will take the project to the Council for the Council's consideration and, if the Council approves, for Council authorization as a public improvement subject to assessment. It is at Engineer initiation, before Council authorization, that the particular processes called for in the Code for assessable public improvements begin. These processes include notice, a public hearing and an opportunity to remonstrate. The objection to the process for this alley project was raised as a due process violation. There is no evidence of a due process violation. The process is one that is well established, clear and affords property owners opportunities to be heard. Although assessments may include costs incurred prior to the Council's authorization of the improvement, property owners have several opportunities to be heard on the project, on the decision to proceed with it as an assessable improvement, and then also with regard to the amount of the assessment. In this case there was greater than usual opportunity for involvement, including observation or participation in the work of the West University Task Force. The Council had before it the process, including the degree of public involvement, when it considered the project in light of the Code changes to the assessment process, and again nearly a year later when they authorized the improvement as a project subject to assessment. There was ample process. Certainly, no property owner is eager to pay an assessment. The decision on the distribution of the costs of public improvements is a policy decision taken at the highest level. Local improvement district assessments are a traditional and commonly used process of sharing the cost of improvements. The decisions in this matter concerning the policy changes that set the assessment procedures to be followed, the initiation of the project, the creation of the district and the final assessments, were all made at the high policy level, or were made in accordance with those policy directives. No matter how they are articulated, the objections all ultimately are objections to the policies set by the Council and followed carefully in this proceeding. Because the Council's policy decisions were made while they were using the West University area as the model to illustrate the impacts of their policy choices, it is very clear that the requirements of the ordinances, as well as state law and the Oregon constitution, were followed exactly as the Council intended. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 8 ~-=---=-===-==- - ~-=-======--===--=~-======~-=---~ -==---=------=-- ===-=- -==----------=- - -=-=----=-~ =--- --=--~ -=---~ --=-- --- - -~ - -=-- -=- ~ -- --- - - ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ - - - - ~ ---=- ~""=-- ~- - --= - - ~- - -- --------- --- --- -- - ---- .- . - -~-=- ~- - .-- -. - -. - -. -- FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION With regard to the proposed final assessment, the Hearings Official finds that notice of the public hearing was provided and all the property owners were given an opportunity to participate in the hearings. Letters informing property owners of the hearing and notification to property owners of the intent of the City to characterize the assessment as an assessment, not a tax, as required by ORS 305.583(5), were mailed to the property owners. The overall cost of the project was greater than originally estimated. This is quite possible in such a complex project involving numerous locations, each with poetically unique characteristics. The increase was not excessive, and is justified by the city engineer's report. The Hearings Officer finds that the project is one for which the assessments are for local improvements as set forth in ORS 310.410 because 1. The assessments do not exceed actual costs; 2. The assessments are imposed for a capital construction project that provides a specific benefit for a specific property or rectifies a problem caused by a specific property 3. The assessments are imposed in a single assessment upon completion of the project; and 4. The assessments allow the property owners to elect to pay the assessment with interest over at least ten (10) years. The Hearings Official also finds that the proposed final assessment, calculated and recommended by the City Engineer is reasonable and consistent with the Eugene Code. The Hearings Official recommends that the Council act in accord with the City Engineer's recommendations, adopting the ordinance prepared for the public hearing, levying the assessment as set forth by the City Engineer. Dated: February 6, 2006 LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ASSESSMENTS FOR ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD Page 9 REPORT 10: RPT236SP MASTER PROJECT #: 2005-01001 PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION - 17033141-00100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033141-00200 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-00400 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033141-00500 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-00700 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-01600 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-02000 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-13100 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033141-13200 000 PROPERTY DBSCRXPTXON 17033144-04700 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-04800 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-04900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-05000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-05100 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033144-05200 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-05300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSES,SMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - VVEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS EXHIBIT- C CONTRACT #: 2005 00030 JOB #: 93004172 ALLEY PAVING LOCATED IN THE WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOOD GENERALLY BOUNDED BY WILLAMETTE STREET, 19TH AVENUE, KINCAID STREET, .AND FRANKLIN BOULEVARD TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMO'ONT - - ~~ . ~ ~{ ~ r I ~~ ~ r ~~ ~ I' -''';J\ !:~:)~1~ ;,"~'r.. t;\~t' ~~.. ~~/ ~ ? > - ;!,:'~: ,( \ , ;. ),' fl,'~ {:......... _<.... l ..., ~:-') ~ ~!;;.- rY~"" 1 ~...\.:...;':........ I I ~.:.:t .... ;;z; \J ~ r{ ..... ~ -.J I .;:-~-:,. r':.-t~ ~>>~ '~/ ~\.":- .....::f, ~....r ~...."'\r ;..-;;r ~ ->~... - - - - - OWNER INFORMATION 2SCH LLC 375 W 4TH AVE STE201 EUGENE OR 97401 OCONNELL MICHAEL R SR 859 WILLAMETTE ST STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 MCCREA ROBERT J & KATHLEEN S 1147 HIGH ST EUGENE OR 97401 KNOX DAVID F 2131 MCMILLAN ST EUGENE OR 97405 BARTLE MILDRED C 341 E 12TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 TURNER PROPERTIES PTRSHP 19223 DEHAVILLAND DR SARATOGA CA 95070 KERSEY DAVID & PATRICIA LYNN PO BOX 70314 EUGENE OR 97401 BECKLEY-ANDERSON LLC PO BOX 848 EUGENE OR 97440 TURNER PROPERTIES PTRSHP 19223 DEHAVILLAND DR SARATOGA CA 95070 SARAH LAND COMPANY 280 E 11TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 KH.A. INVESTMENTS 1515 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 SARAH LAND CO 1515 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 SQUARE ONE INVESTMENTS 159 E 15TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 VALDEZ CORP 159 E 15TH AVE STEl EUGENE OR ...g7401 LOCHNER NANCY 1690 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 OLRICH FAMILY REV TRUST 4849 LOWRY RD OAKLAND CA 94605 REPORT ID: RPT236SP - 17033144-05400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-06300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-06400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-07800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-07900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-08000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-08100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-08400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-08500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-08600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ~7033144-08900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-09200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-09300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-09400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-09500 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033144-09800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT - (~~ ~~~~~"}, ~ ~ /~ ~~~ : ~t(~~ f~~ ~""'~ ::..\:t~ L~~~"'3 r~ ._~ :<.-/"':::...&1 -::/< ~L;~r-;:- - ".....!: j: "'..-_ }~/ \I/J~~~ J"" (0:;; ... ~~ .f ~!.-;' ~~;'I,,"~:~ l ....)\>~ \""/~;t :: ~ Ji~ - - - - ~ ~(:~ _I \~~: r~:~ r:)~ ~~~~~~r~ ~~:~"~~-~l~ I:\:~~. ~~~~::;~ ~ r~~~:~f ; ~H~; Uf ~ ~;~ - ~ ~ ~~::\ ~~. (~l;~~ ~~~2 ~~: ~ r~}~- ~~~ -""'-I"~Az~;'fl;: ~;'~r;~ ~~ ~~/\:~ ---:(~ :i/~l<\ f PAGE: 2 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INPORMATION KEATING STEPHEN G 934 LAUREL ST JUNCTION CITY OR 97448 JACA INVESTMENT LLC 240 E 15TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 CORE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 4682 PORTLAND OR 97208 BENNETT ROBERT C & JOYCE E 355 CHERRY DR EUGENE OR 97401 M & A INVESTMENTS LLC 32 E 11TH AVENUE EUGENE OR 97401 ASHLEY DONALD H 1349 A ST HAYWARD CA 94541 MCELROY DONALD RAY 120 W 30TH AVE EUGENE OR 97405 SQUARE ONE INVESTMENTS 159 E 15TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 EUGENE GARDEN CLUB 1645 HIGH ST EUGENE OR 97401 LEUALLEN HARRY N & JACKIE PO BOX 50058 EUGENE OR 97405 FREY DARLENE K & HALWORTH RAYBURN 82993 N CLOVERDALE RD CRESWELL OR 97426 PEPPERMINT PROPERTIES LLC 1345 OLIVE ST EUGENE OR 97401 CORVALLIS MUSKETEERS LLC PO BOX 5387 EUGENE OR 97405 PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF LANE COUNTY 360 E 10TH AVE STE104 EUGENE OR 97401 PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF ~ COUNTY 360 E 10TH AVE STE104 EUGENE OR 97401 BURKE SHIRLEY L 40016 VIA GRAZIANA MURRIETA CA 92562 REPORT ID: RPT236SP -- 17033144-09900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10700 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-10800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-11700 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-14600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-14800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-14900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-15000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-15100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-15200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033144-15300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - \'VEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT - - - - - - - I~''f..~,~ -l [~~ \~ ,(~I ) ~ ~v:\~/ [f ,":~r <- .>>.~~ J~ :\'~~ I ~~: rL ;/T-;~ ~~ - - - - - - PAGE: 3 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INPORMATION PEARL STREET PROPERTIES LLC 111 W 7TH AVE STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 PEARL STREET PROPERTIES LLC 111 W 7TH AVE STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 PEARL STREET PROPERTIES LLC 111 W 7TH AVE STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 PFUNDER RICHARD R & KAREN H 2052 S SHASTA LP EUGENE OR 97405 CALCIANO FRANK 1780 POLK #A EUGENE OR 97402 1577 PEARL STREET LLC 3354 KING EDWARDS CT EUGENE OR 97401-8513 1577 PEARL STREET LLC 3354 KING EDWARDS CT EUGENE OR 97401-8513 VERANO ALVARO J REV LIVING TRUST 88844 EVERS RD ELMIRA OR 97437 OAK INVESTMENT INC 280 E 11TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 BMJ PROPERTIES LLC 13750 SW 27TH CT BEAVERTON OR 97008 WRIGHT DAVID E & DEBRA J 1397 HAMMOCK ST EUGENE OR 97401 BAKER GEORGE F 4350 N SHASTA LP EUGENE OR 97405 BJO PROPERTIES INC 1390 GROSBEAK CT REDMOND OR 97756 SYRIOS TRUST 1247 VILLARD EUGENE OR 97403 ANDERSON BRENT H & CONSTANCE H 85520 APPLETREE CT EUGENE OR 97405 ANDERSON BRENT H & CONSTANCE H 85520 APPLETREE CT EUGENE OR 97405 REPORT 10: RPT236SP - 17033144-15400 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-06400 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-06600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-06800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-06900 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033223-07000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-07700 000 PROPBRTY DB SCRIPTION 17033223-09300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-09400 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033223-09800 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL J:MPROVBMENT AMOtrNT - - - - - - - ~ ~ "O-~ - r.:.-<: lr. ~ - r ....r;; ~ t:! :'.< / 1 .....~ 1") ~ ,~?;. I - - PAGE: 4 RUN DATE: 217/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INPORMATION HODGES CECIL M 1670 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 KREBS FRANK LEWIS JR TE 1410 W 25TH AVE EUGENE OR 97405 WILSON CARRIE LINK 235 W 10 AVE EUGENE OR 97401 DIAMOND JOEL & JULIE 1297 HIGH ST EUGENE OR 97401 PEACE HEALTH POBOX 10905 EUGENE OR 97440 TROTTER BETTY 41496 MCKENZIE HWY SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 TROTTER BETTY 41496 MCKENZIE HWY SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 DIAMOND JOEL R & JULIE 3161 ELLIOTT AVE SEATTLE WA 87121 HUNT LAWRENCE J & BONNIE JO 777 NE 2ND ST CORVALLIS OR 97330 CARMICHAEL ARTHUR C JR & JEAN 1585 GRANT RD LOS ALTO CA 94024 CARMICHAEL BETA HOUSE LLC 1585 GRANT RD LOS ALTOS CA 94024 DIAMOND PARKING INC 3161 ELLIOTT AVE SEATTLE WA 98121 CHI PSI ASSOC OF ALPHA ETA DELTA 12700 SW 72ND AVE TIGARD OR 97223 WINGARD GAIL A 84320 N ENTERPRISE RD PLEASANT HILL OR 97455 BENNETT ROBERT D & NORMA J PO BOX 10342 EUGENE OR 97440 HULT & ASSOCIATES LLC PO BOX 1340 EUGENE OR 97440 REPORT 10: RPT236SP -- 17033223-09900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033223-10000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-03200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-03300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-03400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-07800 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033231-07900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-08100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-08500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-08501 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033231-08502 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-00300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-00400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-00800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-16300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-16400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL I:MPROVEMBNT AMOUNT - - - - - - - - - - - - PAGE: 5 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION KENNY LIAM 20 MCQUEEN ST KATONAH NY 10536 STAFFORD MOLLY R 437 E 11TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 PRESBYTERY OF THE CASCADES 245 SW BANCROFT STED PORTLAND OR 97239 MCKENZIE RIVER LODGE #195 850 E 14TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 OREGON BETA CHAPTER OF SIGMA ALPHA EPSILON FRAT 1699 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 ALDER ASSOCIATES OF EUGENE 2201 WILLAMETTE ST STEB EUGENE OR 97405 WENTWOOD SH LP PO BOX 11126 EUGENE OR 97440 WENTWOOD SH LP PO BOX 11126 EUGENE OR 97440 HUGHES LELAND G & J S PO BOX 5332 EUGENE OR 97405 HUGHES LELAND G & J S PO BOX 5332 EUGENE OR 97405 UNIVERSITY MANOR LLC 111 W 7TH ST STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 OREGON STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION PO BOX 488 CORVALLIS OR 97339 PEACEHEALTH MEDICAL POBOX 10905 EUGENE OR 97440 PEACEHEALTH MEDICAL POBOX 1090S EUGENE OR 97440 BURRI DENNIS A PO BOX 826 PLEASANT HILL OR 97455 BURRI DENNIS A PO BOX 826 PLEASANT HILL OR 97455 REPORT 10: RPT236SP - 17033232-16500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-16600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-16900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-17800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-17900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-18000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-18100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033232-18400 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033232-19500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-00100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-00200 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-00400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-00500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-00600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-00700 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-01700 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT - - - ~? ~.. ~~./"'" 1"" .... -"ji ~... ::.J<-'- ~~{ ':;--)";~ l.......~~...I~{.I..<r~JJ:I~1 <, ,'~ ,~C~:< ,.:,'~'j ~_~~r ~~ ; ~~ \ ~~::~ ~ i K ~~ ~ ~~ ~; ~~~~{~r ~ - - - - - - j I" . ~:~ ~~ ~- ~:? ~ ~'~; f: ~ \,~;.. ) -:' /;f ') :; ~ <- ~ - - PAGE: 6 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION ZIMMER SHAWNITA E & JAMES R PO BOX 829 CRESWELL OR 97426 NEURELIUS LLC PO BOX 7608 EUGENE OR 97401 BERG DONALD A 40063 LITTLE FALL CREEK RD FALL CREEK OR 97438 QUINNEY ROBERT S & LESLIE 1924 KIMBERLY DR EUGENE OR 97405 LAVE ROY E TE 690 UNIVERSITY LOS ALTOS CA 94022 EUGENE CITY OF CITY HALL II 858 PEARL ST EUGENE OR 97401 EUGENE CITY OF CITY HALL II 858 PEARL ST EUGENE OR 97401 QUINNEY ROBERT S & LESLIE 1924 KIMBERLY DR EUGENE OR 97405 DIAMOND PARKING INC 3161 ELLIOTT AVE 0928 SEATTLE WA 98121 VIGELAND CHRIS 35608 CAMP CREEK RD SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 FILLOY RICHARD A TE 3350 FILLMORE EUGENE OR 97405 OBa ENTERPRISES LLC 1390 GROSBEAK CT REDMOND OR 97756 OBO ENTERPRISES LLC 1390 GROSBEAK CT REDMOND OR 97756 OLSON WILLIAM & JANA L 1390 GROSBEAK ST REDMOND OR 97756 VIGELAND CHRIS 35608 CAMP CREEK RD SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 BERG DONALD A 40063 LITTLE FALL CREEK RD FALL CREEK OR 97438 - - =---- ---=---~ ----==-----===---====- ~ - - ---------=====----- -=-----=--- ----=======---- - =-- --~ ~ -= ~ -=- -- ~ ~ -=--=-- ----=-=- -----==--- ==== - -=-- ~ - -=-- ----- - ~- -- - - - - =- - - ~ - - ~ - ----= - = - - - -~ -- - =----=- --=- -= -~-~~--=- - -- - -- -- - ~ -= - - ---- - - - -- ~-----=-- ----= -- REPORT 10: RPT236SP CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - VVEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS - TOTAL :IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT 17033233-01900 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION - 17033233-02000 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION r" '".., _ ..;J --..:.,-:, f 1: - ~ rtr: ~ -,..~....~J I~ ~-..-"( ;f.:~/~; "!.~'<. ~".~~~~~\ /~"/ ~~~... . ,,"::.,. 17033233-02200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-02900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-03000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-03100 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-03200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-03400 801 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION r ~..... ~~ 'U . \' ...).... ,I ~";." 1 ( _ ~,.. \. ~ If-~:'.... .... ~..c: ' ~ ...~ ~i'{ ~ ~ :~~ ~ 17033233-03500 801 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-03800 000 PROPERTY DESCR~PTION - 17033233-03900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-04100 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION - 17033233-04200 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-04400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-04500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION - 17033233-04600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PAGE: 7 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION WHITEHURST JOHN R 1913 STATE ST SANTA BARBARA CA 93101 LOUIE JACK PO BOX 2617 EUGENE OR 97402 PURVIS MATTOX L JR 880 W 38TH AVE EUGENE OR 97405 KNUDSEN LUCILLE S TE PO BOX 2374 FLORENCE OR 97439 DROUET LOUI S DOUGLAS JR TE PO BOX 25712 EUGENE OR 97402 SYRIOS TRUST 1247 VILLARD EUGENE OR 97403 JOY LIMITED PTRSHP 2042 HARRIS ST EUGENE OR 97405 KLINGENSMITH PHILIP M 24600 LAWRENCE RD JUNCTION CITY OR 97448 KLINGENSMITH PHILIP N 1-2 24600 LAWRENCE RD JUNCTION CITY OR 97448 BERG BRENDA L 85408 S WILLAMETTE ST EUGENE OR 97405 SERENITY LANE HEALTH SRVCES 616 E 16TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 NEURELIUS LLC PO BOX 7608 EUGENE OR 97401 NEURELIUS LLC PO BOX 7608 EUGENE OR 97401 BERG DALE A 367 W 13TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 BIRCH MANOR APTS 1001 RIVER LP 1 EUGENE OR 97404 NEURELIUS INC 32910 E PEARL ST COBURG OR 97408 . REPORT 10: RPT236SP --- 17033233-04700 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-04900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-05001 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-05002 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-05300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-05400 000 PROPERTY DBSCRXPTXON 17033233-05401 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTXQN 17033233-06000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-06100 000 PROPERTY DESCRXPTXON 17033233-06200 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-06300 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-06500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-06600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-07000 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTXON 17033233-07001 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-07400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - VVEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT - - - - - - - - - - - PAGE: 8 RUN DATE: 2f1/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION NEURELIUS INC 32910 E PEARL ST COBURG OR 97408 WHITELEY GREGORY T 1430 WILLAMETTE ST 220 EUGENE OR 97401 BAKER GEORGE F 4350 N SHASTA LP EUGENE OR 97405 BAKER GEORGE F 4350 N SHASTA LP EUGENE OR 97405 SOMMER LOUIS J TE 555 E 40TH AVE EUGENE OR 97405 BAKER GEORGE F 4350 N SHASTA LP EUGENE OR 97405 HACK BETTE J TE 558 E 16TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 WHITELEY GREGORY T 1430 WILLAMETTE ST 220 EUGENE OR 97401 OBO ENTERPRISES LLC 1390 GROSBEAK CT REDMOND OR 97756 OLSON WILLIAM & JANA L 1390 GROSBEAK ST REDMOND OR 97756 NEURELIUS LLC PO BOX 7608 EUGENE OR 97401 REYNOLDS JANET G 35 CHURCH ST PITTSFORD NY 14534 TINDALL BRADLEY C 2701 E WILSHIRE DR EUGENE OR 97405 STRINGFIELD MARK A 3887 MEADOW VIEW DR EUGENE OR 97408 STEVENSON CYRIL A & WENDY 1388 WILLAMETTE ST EUGENE OR 97401 GALLIC GORDAN 1247 VILLARD EUGENE OR 97403 REPORT ID: RPT236SP -- 17033233-10600 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-10700 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-10800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-10900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-11000 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-11100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-11200 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-11600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-11702 000 PROPBRTY DBSCRIPTION 17033233-11800 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-14600 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-14900 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-15000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-15100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-15200 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033233-19400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - \NEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT - : ..- <"; ~ ~~ Jtl~ -t:;;-' c~..:~,~ (~\ \(~\~?'~ J~ ~~~~:~~~_-=~~:~~~/;~;~~( ~ :t~~~:;\ ~-~~;ll~~~ l ~:r~ "~/ i(~~~~ f{~,::',- ~ ~:?~~ ~ ~~ J ~ ~ ~?~ Yo &~~~~ ~~: ~ ::l ~;~~ ~~:~:=-: ^ .; ;~: ~~ t~ f~:/~ "1- )\ ~ ~) ,I ~ t& ... ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ;.. -..; ~ ~~,.. f~ - f:Jl~~~~ :l:__:ftrj; ~~: ... ~ / ~ ~ 1. 'i~ '>,I~:;!\~ .l c; (1 .... ~ ' ~ l _ .... ~ ~ - - - - - - - PAGE: 9 RUN DATE: 217/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION HAPPY HIPPO LLC 90832 SUNDERMAN RD SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 MAINWARING SAM ARNOLD TE 970 N PARK AVE EUGENE OR 97404 GRANADA WILLOWS LLC 453 COVEY LN EUGENE OR 97401 GRANADA WILLOWS LLC 453 COVEY LN EUGENE OR 97401 GRANADA WILLOWS LLC 453 COVEY LN EUGENE OR 97401 DEGENEAULT & ANSLOW INC 1953 GARDEN AVE EUGENE OR 97403 CARMACK ROY J JR & ROSALIND 7655 THURSTON RD SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 OLSON WILLIAM & JANA L 1390 GROSBEAK ST REDMOND OR 97756 ROEHL SITTNER & ROEHL HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 11810 EUGENE OR 97401 HACK BETTE J TE 558 E 16TH AVE EUGENE OR 97401 PADGETT LILA M 6177 PARKINSON LN COLUMBUS OH 43232 SCHNIDER JILL 1755 PATTERSON ST EUGENE OR 97401 DEGENEAULT LEWIS ALLEN REVOCABLE LIV TR 3875 MEADOW VIEW DR EUGENE OR 97408 DEGENEAULT LEWIS ALLEN REVOCABLE LIV TR 3875 MEADOW VIEW DR EUGENE OR 97408 THOMPSON MARGARET PEGGY 212 LAUREL ST STE202 SANTA CRUZ CA 95060 SYRIOS TRUST 1247 VILLARD EUGENE OR 97403 REPORT 10: RPT236SP - 17033234-00100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-00200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-00300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-00400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-00900 801 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033234-01100 000 PROPERTY DBSCRIPTION 17033234-01200 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-01300 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-01400 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 17033234-01500 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-01300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-01600 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-01700 000 PROPBRTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-02000 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-02100 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 18030522-03300 000 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT ~ "):: ~:~(.}~~~::~~~~ ~~~ ;~,,~~! ~l~<= -\l~ '~1f~:';~ .." ()L ~ y \'( J,~\\{ ~ - - ~~ :;~~f~~~.r. ::j-~~ ~ i~-f:;~ : :~::;y(~ ./ / ~~- /'s:_~...1~1 ~~" : l,~1~:(.1 r/ : . jJ ,-.$.:..) ~ :. ~<., ~: ;r -~~~ ~~ ~~~ , ok J :L>;.~..... ~ \":.l ~:"" -.' k. .... ~ (~ Y';. - - - - - - - - - - - PAGE: 10 RUN DATE: 217/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION DELTA SIGMA FRATERNITY 1699 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 FRICHETTE/SCHAEFER LLC PO BOX 50937 EUGENE OR 97405 FRICHETTE/SCHAEFER LLC PO BOX 50937 EUGENE OR 97405 PSI ALPHA OF CHI OMEGA 76351 MOSBY CREEK RD COTTAGE GROVE OR 97424 SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF BAHAIS PO BOX 10743 EUGENE OR 97440 MAK RI CK & MARGARET FAYE 1597 HACKAMORE WAY EUGENE OR 97401 UNIVERSITY MANOR LLC 111 W 7TH ST STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 UNIVERSITY MANOR LLC 111 W 7TH ST STE320 EUGENE OR 97401 FOX MURIEL C TR 1669 COPPING ST EUGENE OR 97404 CHRISTIE JUDITH ANN 771 W 52ND AVE EUGENE OR 97405 HODGES CECIL M & HELEN 1670 OAK ST EUGENE OR 97401 GRAY EALIE BERNICE 12115 NW 10TH AVE VANCOUVER WA 98685 VANNETT MICHAEL 2526 34TH ST SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 SCHAFLER N & M 2610 BAKER BLVD EUGENE OR 97403 HELIKSON LLOYD W & DORIS 2550 LAWRENCE ST EUGENE OR 97405 ALLEN SHERYL 1601 HARPER ST SANTA CRUZ CA 95062 ~ - - - - - -=-~~ -----=--- -=-----=====-- -==--- -----=--====------- -=--- -~ - -=- -~-- - =--- - --=----::::::= -----~-- - -- ----=----- ------ --- - ---=---=- - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - -- -- ~ --= - --- - - - -- ~---=-- ----= ~ - - - -- --- - -~ - -- -~~ =----- ~ REPORT 10: RPT236SP CITY OF EUGENE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM ASSESSMENT REGISTER (CITY COUNCIL) 93004172 - WEST UNIVERSITY NEIGH. ALLEYS ..... TOTAL IMPROVEMENT AMOUNT TOTAL ACCOUNTS = 160 TOTAL AMOUNT: $1,752,827.44 PAGE: 11 RUN DATE: 2n/2006 RUN TIME: 12:34:22 PM OWNER INFORMATION