Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 6: Ordinance on TransPlan and Metro Plan Text Amendments
ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY Action: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) to Move Project Nos. 333 and 506 from the Future Roadway Projects List to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects List, to Update the Project Descriptions for Project Nos. 333 and 506 and to Make Related Amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Meeting Date: November 9, 2009 Agenda Item Number: 6 Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Rob Inerfeld www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-5343 ISSUE STATEMENT The council is asked to adopt the attached ordinance and findings approving the following amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (“TransPlan”) and the Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan): Moving Project Numbers 333 and 506 from the Future Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list and to update the project descriptions to make them consistent with the adopted Regional Transportation Plan. The proposed amendments would add to TransPlan’s Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list the following two projects: th A.Project No. 333: West 11 Avenue, Green Hill Road to Terry Street, “Upgrade to urban facility.” B.Project No. 506: North Eugene Transportation Improvements, River Road to Delta Highway, “Improve capacity across Willamette River within N. Eugene Area.” The public hearing on this matter was held on October 19, 2009. Responses to questions asked by the City Council during the hearing are attached. BACKGROUND On November 8, 2007, the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) adopted an update to the federally- required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). This update moved projects from the Illustrative Project List (beyond 20 years) to the Financially Constrained 20-Year Capital Investment Actions List and made several other changes to proposed projects. MPC’s adoption of the updated RTP triggered a state Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requirement that Eugene, Springfield and Lane County adopt amendments to TransPlan that make it consistent with the RTP; the elected bodies of these three jurisdictions chose to do so by developing a work plan that was later approved by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M091109\S0911096.doc The work plan requires, as a first step, that the local jurisdictions amend TransPlan by deleting transportation projects that have been completed and move four ODOT Highway projects from the Future list to the Financially Constrained list (only two of these projects are located in Eugene; the other two are being processed by the City of Springfield). A public hearing on October 19th was held to consider moving the two ODOT highway projects located th in Eugene – West 11 Avenue from Terry Street to Green Hill Road and Beltline Highway from River Road to Coburg Road – from the Future list to the Financially Constrained list. The Eugene Planning Commission recommended approval of these amendments. In response to testimony and Planning Commission recommendations, the project descriptions were made more generic so that the project designs could remain responsive to site conditions and needs of adjoining properties and stakeholders. For instance, in response to testimony received related to natural th resources issues, the project description for Project No. 333 (West 11 Avenue) will not specify the precise number of travel lanes for the roadway. Written public testimony received during the October 19 council hearing and draft minutes of the hearing are attached. City staff is committed to addressing these issues through the facility planning process for West 11th Avenue from Terry Street to Green Hill Road, which is currently neither funded nor scheduled. RELATED CITY POLICIES TransPlan contains the following policies that, on balance, support these proposed amendments: ? Transportation Infrastructure Protection and Management: Protect and manage existing and future transportation infrastructure. ? TransPlan Project Lists: Adopt by reference as part of the Metro Plan the 20-Year Capital Investment Actions project lists contained in TransPlan. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. ? Motor Vehicle Level of Service: Use motor vehicle level of service standards to maintain acceptable and reliable performance on the roadway system. (abridged) ? Prioritization of State and Federal Revenue: Set priorities for investment of Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and federal revenues programmed in the region’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to address safety and major capacity problems on the region’s transportation system. COUNCIL OPTIONS 1.Approve the attached ordinance and findings; 2.Approve the ordinance with modified findings; 3.Separate the two projects to approve only one at this time; or 4.Postpone action. CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION The City Manager recommends Option 1: adoption of the attached ordinance and findings. Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M091109\S0911096.doc SUGGESTED MOTION Move to adopt the draft ordinance attached as Exhibit A amending the text of TransPlan and the Metro Plan, which will move Project Numbers 333 and 506 from the Future Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list. ATTACHMENTS A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit A to Ordinance: Revisions to TransPlan Exhibit B to Ordinance: Findings of Consistency B. Staff responses to Council questions of October 19, 2009 C. Letter from Bureau of Land Management dated October 15, 2009 D. Letter from Friends of Eugene dated October 19, 2009 E. Draft City Council minutes from October 19, 2009 FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Rob Inerfeld, Transportation Planning Manager Telephone: 682-5343 Staff E-Mail: rob.inerfeld@ci.eugene.or.us Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M091109\S0911096.doc ATTACHMENT A ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE- SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN (TRANSPLAN) TO MOVE PROJECT NOS. 333 AND 506 FROM THE FUTURE ROADWAY PROJECTS LIST TO THE FINANCIALLY CONSTRAINED ROADWAY PROJECTS LIST, TO UPDATE THE PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS FOR PROJECT NOS. 333 AND 506 AND TO MAKE RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN. The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that : A. Chapter IV of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) sets forth procedures for amendment of the Metro Plan, which for Eugene are implemented by Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971. B. The Metro Plan identifies the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) as a special purpose or functional plan which forms the basis for the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and guides surface transportation improvements in the metropolitan area. C. The City Council adopted TransPlan by Ordinance No. 19385, enacted on April 28, 1986, which was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 19584, enacted on November 28, 1988, Ordinance No. 19857, enacted on June 8, 1992, Ordinance No. 19872, enacted on September 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 19887 enacted on November 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 20186 enacted on February 14, 2000, Ordinance No. 20234 enacted on September 10, 2001, and Ordinance No. 20258 enacted on July 8, 2002, adopting a revised Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and adopting revisions to TransPlan. D. On November 8, 2007, the Metropolitan Policy Committee adopted an update to the federally-required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); the update included moving Project No. 333 and Project No. 506 from the Illustrative Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list and updating the descriptions and costs for those two projects. On August 13, 2008, the City Council initiated TransPlan and Metro Plan amendments to move these two projects from the Future Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list in TransPlan. E. Following a public hearing on May 5, 2009, the Eugene Planning Commission met on June 29, 2009, and recommended to the Eugene City Council that TransPlan be amended to move Project No. 333 and Project No. 506 from the Future Roadway Projects list to the 20- year Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list, and related amendments to the Metro Plan. F. On October 19, 2009, the City Council conducted a public hearing on these amendments, and is now ready to take action based upon the above recommendations and the evidence and testimony already in the record as well as the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearings held on adopting revisions to TransPlan and to the Metro Plan. G. Substantial evidence exists within the record that the proposal meets the requirements of Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 and the requirements of applicable state and local law as described in the findings adopted in support of this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TransPlan, adopted by Ordinance No. 19385, enacted on April 28, 1986, and amended by Ordinance No. 19584, enacted on November 28, 1988, Ordinance No. 19857, enacted on June 8, 1992, Ordinance No. 19872, enacted on September 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 19887 enacted on November 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 20186 enacted on February 14, 2000, Ordinance No. 20234, enacted on September 10, 2001, and Ordinance No. 20258 enacted on July 8, 2002, is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The revisions to the 20-Year Financially-Constrained Roadway Projects list included in Exhibit A are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of the Metro Plan, as required by Metro Plan Policy F-9, page III-F-7. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. Section 3. The City Council adopts the findings set forth in the attached Exhibit B in support of this action. Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this _____ day of _____________, 2009 _____ day of _____________, 2009 _____________________________ _____________________________ City Recorder Mayor 00230893.DOC;1 Exhibit A 1of 4 Table 1a-Financially Constrained 20-Year Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects Geographic Estimated NameLimitsDescriptionJurisdictionCostLengthNumber Project Category:New Arterial Link or Interchange Status:Programmed West Eugene Seneca Road to Beltline W 11th - Garfield: 4-lane ODOT$17,283,0001.3336 Parkway, (1A)Roadnew construction Status:Unprogrammed West Eugene Garfield Street to Seneca W 11th - Garfield: 4-lane ODOT$34,231,0001.3337Parkway, (1B) Roadnew construction, continued th West Eugene West 11 Avenue to Construct two lanes of future ODOT $30,496,000 2.56 338 Parkway (2A) Beltline Road 4-lane roadway th West Eugene West 11 Avenue to Construct remaining two lanes ODOT $6,545,000 2.56 339 Parkway (2B) Beltline Road Project Category:Added Freeway Lanes or Major Interchange Improvements Status:Unprogrammed I-5@ Beltline HighwayReconstruct interchange ODOT$53,300,0000606 and I-5, upgrade Beltline Road East to 5 lane urban facility, and construct I-5 bike and pedestrian bridge. North EugeneRiver Road to Delta Improve capacity across ODOT$51,292,2001.76506 TransportationHighwayWillamette River within ImprovementsN. Eugene Area Project Category:Arterial Capacity Improvements Status:Programmed Bloomberg McVay Highway to 30th Modification of connection Lane County, $500,0000.4297 ConnectorAvenueof McVay Highway to 30th ODOT Avenue Status:Unprogrammed 6th/7th IntersectionGarfield Street to Provide improvements such ODOT, $520,0000133 ImprovementWashington/Jefferson as additional turn lanes and Eugene Streetsignal improvements; intersections include 6th/7th Exhibit A 2of 4 Avenues at: Garfield, Chambers, Washington/Jefferson Street Bridge Beltline Highway@ Coburg RoadConstruct ramp and signal ODOT$500,0000622 Improvements W. 11th AvenueGreen Hill Road toUpgrade to urban ODOT, $20, 000,0001.51333 Terry StreetfacilityEugene Geographic Estimated NameLimitsDescriptionJurisdictionCostLengthNumber Project Category:Urban Standards Status:Unprogrammed S. 42nd StreetMain Street to Jasper Reconstruct to 2 to 3-lane ODOT$1,600,0000.8954 urban facility; curbs, sidewalks and bike lanes Project Category:Study Status:Programmed I-5 @ Beltline @ Interchange Project development work ODOT $3,375,000 -- 606 Study & Design Status:Unprogrammed I-5 Interchange Willamette River south Comprehensive study of I-5 ODOT $750,000 -- 250 th Study to 30 Avenue interchanges South Bank Street Mill Street to Hilyard Develop refinement plan for Eugene, $250,0001178 ImprovementsStreetstreet systemODOT Main Street/ I-5 to UGB Access management plan ODOT/Springfield $100,000 6.0 838 Highway 126 Eugene-Springfield I-5 to Main Corridor Study ODOT/Springfield $150,000 6.5 835 Hwy. Main St. and 52nd 52nd to Main Interchange Plans ODOT/Springfield $100,000 1.5 96 St./Hwy 126 Int. Beltline River Rd to Coburg Rd Facility Plan Study ODOT $500,000 3.46 555 Exhibit A 3of 4 Table 1b-Future (Beyond 20-Years) Capital Investment Actions: Roadway Projects Geographic Estimated NameLimitsDescriptionJurisdictionCostLengthNumber Project Category:New Arterial Link or Interchange Status:Future Eugene-Springfieldat Main StreetConstruct interchangeODOT$9,000,000027 Highway (SR-126) Eugene-Springfieldat 52nd StreetConstruct interchangeODOT $9,000,000030 Highway (SR-126) Beltline HighwayWest 11th Avenue to Continue widening to 4 ODOT$17,000,0001.14312 Roosevelt Boulevardlanes; new RR Xing, interchange @ WEP, grade separation @ Roosevelt and turn lanes on West 11th Ave (ODOT: West 11th North City Limits Stage 3) Project Category:Added Freeway Lanes or Major Interchange Improvements Status:Future I-530th Avenue/McVay Interchange reconstruction ODOT$15,000,000257 Highwayto improve operations and safety, reconstruct ramps and bridges to modern standards, and provide for 6 lanes on I-5. I-105Washington/Jefferson Add lane to NB on-ramp ODOT$5,805,0000.75154 Street Bridgefrom 6th Ave, extend third NB lane over bridge to Delta Highway exit ramp Eugene- I-5 to Mohawk BoulevardWiden to 6 lanesODOT$20,124,0002.6 728 Springfield Highway (SR-126) Eugene-SpringfieldPioneer Parkway/Q StreetInterchange improvementsODOT$15,000,0000727 Highway (SR-126) I-105Delta Highway to Coburg Widen to 6 lanesODOT$9,210,6001.19647 Road I-105Coburg Road to I-5Widen to 6 lanesODOT$11,842,2001.53648 Exhibit A 4of 4 Geographic Estimated NameLimitsDescriptionJurisdictionCostLengthNumber I-5I-105 to Highway 58 Widen remaining sections to ODOT$35,000,0005.66260 (Goshen)6 lanes I-5@ Glenwood InterchangeReconfigure interchange, ODOT$10,000,000256 address weaving, provide 6 lanes on freeway I-5 @ Willamette Interchange reconstruction ODOT$25,000,000150 River/Franklin Boulevard to create one full Interchangeinterchange to improve operations and safety, reconstruct ramps and bridges to modern standards, and provide for 6 lanes on I-5 th I-105Washington/Jefferson Add lane to 6 Ave. off-rampODOT$4,300,0000.25151 Street Bridge Project Category:Arterial Capacity Improvements Status:Future Project Category:Urban Standards Status:Future Highway 99Roosevelt Boulevard to Upgrade to urban facilityODOT$4,955,5001.14148 Garfield Street McVay HighwayI-5 to Franklin BoulevardUpgrade to 3-lane urban ODOT$6,500,0001.5833 facility; intersection improvements at I-5 and Franklin Boulevard Jasper RoadS. 42nd Street to Jasper Upgrade to 2 to 3-lane urbanODOT$5,250,0003.560 Road Extension facility; intersection improvement at 42nd Street and Jasper Road Franklin Blvd. Jenkins Drive to Mill St. Upgrade to urban facility Springfield/ODOT $5,000,000 1.2 839 Exhibit B FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY Metro Plan Amendment Criteria Criteria to be used to evaluate amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (TransPlan) and the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) are found in Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3): (a)The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and (b)Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. This application involves amending the project lists in TransPlan and the Metro Plan by moving two projects from the “Future” project list to the “Financially Constrained” project list (“the amendments”). The process for making the amendments to TransPlan, a special purpose functional plan, and the Metro Plan are identical; requiring the City to follow the “Type II” amendment process. To become effective, only the City needs to approve the amendments. Background The City Council held work sessions on September 25, 2006 and October 9, 2006 to discuss transportation priorities in north and west Eugene. At the second work session, the Council passed motions regarding transportation project priorities to identify the Beltline Corridor from River Road to Coburg Road as the City’s top priority for funding in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), West 11th Avenue from Terry Street to Greenhill Road as its second priority, and a study of the Beltline Corridor from Roosevelt Boulevard to West 11th Avenue as a third priority for funding in the STIP. On November 8, 2007, the MPC adopted an update to the federally-required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); the update included deleting from the RTP all projects related to the WEP and moving four ODOT facilities projects from the Illustrative Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list (the four projects included two Springfield projects, the West 11th Ave. from Terry to Greenhill project and the Beltline Hwy from River Road to Delta Highway project). On August 13, 2008, the Eugene City Council initiated TransPlan and Metro Plan amendments to move two projects from the Future Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list in TransPlan: W. 11th Avenue from Greenhill Road to Terry Street, and Beltline Highway from River Road to Delta Highway. Specifically, the City Council passed the following motion: I move to initiate a TransPlan amendment to delete the West Eugene Parkway from the project list and plan as part of the short-term amendments and to add the two ODOT facility projects into the “Constrained” project list, which are the West 11th Avenue from Terry to Greenhill and the Beltline Highway from River Road to Delta Highway. 1 Criterion A. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL CONSISTENCY: Based on the findings set forth below, the amendments are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and interpretive rules. GOAL 1 - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. Eugene has an acknowledged citizen involvement program and acknowledged processes for securing citizen input on all proposed Metro Plan amendments. The City’s code provisions implement Statewide Planning Goal 1 by requiring that notice of the proposed amendment be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption. Consideration of the amendments will begin with a Planning Commission staff introduction, followed by a public hearing on May 5, 2009. Thus, notification of the proposed amendments and opportunities for public participation in these amendments were consistent with the acknowledged citizen involvement program. Notice of these two proposed amendments was given to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development on January 29, 2009. The DLCD notice was revised on March 4, 2009, to reflect a new hearing date. Notice of this public hearing was mailed on April 14, 2009, to all interested parties requesting such notice and owners of property located within 300 feet of the affected street segments, and posted on April 3, 2009, pursuant to Eugene Code 9.7735(3). Notice of this public hearing was published in the Register Guard newspaper on April 15, 2009. We find that the process for adopting these amendments complies with Statewide Planning Goal 1 since it complies with, and surpasses, the requirements of the State’s citizen involvement provisions. GOAL 2 - LAND USE PLANNING: To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to the use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) is the policy tool that provides a basis for decision-making in this area. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the State in 1982 to be in compliance with statewide planning goals. TransPlan is a functional plan of the Metro Plan, which forms the basis for the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and guides surface transportation improvements in the metropolitan area. TransPlan was acknowledged by the State to be in compliance with statewide planning goals. These findings and the record show that there is an adequate factual base for City’s decision concerning the amendments. Goal 2 requires that plans be coordinated with the plans of affected governmental units and that opportunities be provided for review and comment by affected governmental units. The Goal 2 coordination requirement is met when the adopting governmental body engages in an exchange, or invites such an exchange, between the adopting body and any affected governmental unit and when the adopting body uses the information obtained in the exchange to balance the needs of the citizens. To comply with the Goal 2 coordination requirement, the City coordinated the review of these amendments with all affected governmental units. Specifically, notice was mailed to the Oregon Department of Transportation, Lane Council of Government, Downtown Eugene Inc./Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce, Lane County, City of Springfield, Eugene Neighborhood Liaison, and all Eugene neighborhood associations. 2 Additionally, in accordance with EC 9.7735(3), notice was mailed to the owners and occupants of properties that are the subject of the proposed amendments and to property owners of record within 300 feet of the subject property. There are no Goal 2 exceptions required for the amendments. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2. GOAL 3 - AGRICULTURAL LANDS: To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. The amendments will not change or conflict with the policies of the Metro Plan or TransPlan regarding agricultural lands since these amendments continue to reflect the growth planned for and accommodated by the existing, acknowledged Metro Plan and TransPlan. Goal 3 is not relevant and the amendments do not affect the area’s compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 3. GOAL 4 - FOREST LAND: To conserve forest lands for forest use. The amendments will not change any policies or plan diagram designations of the Metro Plan or TransPlan, nor do the amendments impact any forest lands. Goal 4 is not relevant and the amendments do not affect the area’s compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 4. Therefore, the amendments comply with Goal 4. GOAL 5 - OPEN SPACE, SCENIC AND HISTORIC AREAS, NATURAL RESOURCES: To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. The following administrative rule (OAR 660-023-0250) is applicable to this post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) request: (3) Local governments are not required to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a PAPA unless the PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. For purposes of this section, a PAPA would affect a Goal 5 resource only if: (a) The PAPA creates or amends a resource list or a portion of an acknowledged plan or land use regulation adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5; (b) The PAPA allows new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular significant Goal 5 resource site on an acknowledged resource list; or (c) The PAPA amends an acknowledged UGB and factual information is submitted demonstrating that a resource site, or the impact areas of such a site, is included in the amended UGB area. The amendments do not affect a Goal 5 resource. Specifically, the amendments do not create or amend a list of Goal 5 resources, do not amend a plan or code provision adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5, do not allow new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular Goal 5 resource site, and do not amend the acknowledged Urban Growth Boundary. Therefore, Goal 5 does not apply to these plan amendments. 3 GOAL 6 - AIR, WATER, AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY: To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. Goal 6 addresses waste and process discharges from development, and is aimed at protecting air, water and land from impacts of those discharges. TransPlan currently contains policies related to nodal development, transportation demand management and the encouragement of additional alternative modes of transportation, including transit, bicycles and pedestrian use. These policies are related to the need to maintain and improve the air quality in the metropolitan area. The amendments will not impact any of these policies and no new projects are proposed; the project list amendments consist only of moving two projects from the Future list to the Financially Constrained list. Projects already identified in TransPlan will be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 6. GOAL 7 - AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS: To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. Goal 7 requires that local government planning programs include provisions to protect people and property from natural hazards such as land slides. The amendments do not address potential natural disasters. Further, the amendments do not affect the current restrictions on development in areas subject to natural hazards, nor allow for new development that could result in a natural hazard. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 7. GOAL 8 - RECREATIONAL NEEDS: To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destinations resorts. Goal 8 ensures the provision of recreation facilities to Oregon citizens and is primarily concerned with the provisions of those facilities in non-urban areas of the State. The amendments do not affect the current provisions for recreation areas, facilities or recreational opportunities, nor will the amendments affect access to existing or future recreational facilities. Further, the amendments do not change the Metro Plan and TranPlan policies that support access to recreational facilities with the Metropolitan area and to recreations opportunities outside the area or delete any planned transportation projects that would make recreational facilities more available. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 8. GOAL 9 - ECONOMY OF THE STATE: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. The amendments will not impact the supply of industrial or commercial lands and will not change or conflict with the economic policies of Metro Plan. The amendments do not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan policies directed toward enhancing the economic opportunity available within the Eugene- Springfield area by assuring adequate public facilities and infrastructure to provide a transportation system that is efficient, safe, interconnected and economically viable and fiscally stable. Additionally, the amendments do not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan policies related to the movement of goods; those policies adopted to further the goal of using the public facilities infrastructure to support responsible economic development. The Oregon Transportation Plan recognizes that goods movement of all types makes a significant contribution to the region’s economy and wealth and contributes to residents’ quality 4 of life. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 9. GOAL 10 – HOUSING: To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the state. The amendments will not impact the supply of residential lands and will not result in any change or conflict with the housing policies of the Metro Plan. Additionally, the amendments will not change any of the policies in TransPlan and the Metro Plan related to nodal development and transit-supportive land use patterns and development; those policies adopted to expand housing opportunities for the region’s citizens. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 10. GOAL 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. The Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area has an acknowledged Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The amendments will not result in any change or conflict with the PFSP. GOAL 12 – TRANSPORTATION: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0000, et seq. The proposed amendments are consistent with all applicable provisions of OAR 660-012-0016. Further, the amendments are consistent with, and required by, the Regional Transportation Work Plan approved pursuant to OAR 660-012-0016(2)(b) by the Land Conservation and Development Commission on October 16, 2008. The TPR requires compliance with certain performance measures by either meeting a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction target or obtaining approval of alternative measures. In May, 2001, the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area sought, and obtained, the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s approval of an alternative standard to accomplish reduced reliance on the automobile pursuant to OAR 660-012-0035(5). The approved standard consists of six performance measures designed to reduce automobile reliance and increase transportation choices. The six performance measures focus on nodal development, bus rapid transit, transportation demand management and priority bikeway miles. The proposed amendments will not interfere with the region’s ability to meet the approved alternative performance standards. Further, the proposed amendments are necessary to comply with OAR 660-012-0015(3); that TPR provision requiring cities to prepare, adopt and amend TSPs for lands within their planning jurisdiction to establish a system of transportation facilities and services adequate to meet identified local transportation needs. Specifically regarding the proposed amendment related to Project No. 333, a recent study showed that West 11th at Terry Street (where the highway narrows from four lanes to two), is functioning at a Volume to Capacity ratio (V/C) of 1.06, LOS E during the PM peak hour; below ODOT’s mobility standard for this intersection of V/C 0.80 (Statewide highway, designated Freight Route) and City of Eugene LOS standards are D or better. The TPR states that when amendments to a functional plan would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility the local government shall put in place measures to assure that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standards (level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. Adoption of the amendments will not significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. 5 Based on these findings, the amendments are consistent with Goal 12. GOAL 13 - ENERGY CONSERVATION: To conserve energy. The Energy Goal is a general planning goal that calls for land and uses developed on the land to be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based upon sound economic principles. The proposed amendments will not change the Metro Plan or TransPlan provisions related to promoting more compact development, encouraging the use of alternate modes of transportation and providing a transportation system design to increase the efficiency of travel wherever possible. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 13. GOAL 14 – URBANIZATION: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use. The amendments will not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan provisions adopted to preserve the distinction between urban and rural uses through the development of policies and programs that provide for more efficient urban uses within the UGB, thus preserving rural lands for rural uses. Accordingly, the amendments comply with Goal 14. GOAL 15 - WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway. The Willamette River Greenway area with the Urban Growth Boundary is governed by existing local provisions that have been acknowledged as complying with Goal 15. Those provisions will be unchanged by the amendments. The amendments will not change TransPlan’s and the Metro Plan’s provisions related to the protection and maintenance of the scenic, historical, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River. Further, the amendments will not affect TransPlan’s and the Metro Plan’s compliance with Goal 15. Therefore, the amendments comply with Goal 15. GOALS 16-19 – COASTAL GOALSEstuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelines, Beaches and : ( Dunes, and Ocean Resources) There are no estuarine resources, shorelines, beaches, dunes, or ocean resources located within the Metro Plan or TransPlan boundary. Accordingly, Goals 16, 17, 18, and 19 are not applicable. Criterion B. Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. TransPlan guides regional transportation system planning and development in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. The region covered by TransPlan is the “TransPlan Study Area”, which is an area extending beyond the UGB and Metro Plan boundary that is used for transportation modeling purposes. The proposed amendments to the Metro Plan and TransPlan will not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. Specifically, the Metro Plan and TransPlan projects lists will be simultaneously amended to ensure that the two plans have identical lists. Additionally, the amendments are consistent with the one applicable Metro Plan finding discussed below. 6 F.9 Adopt by reference, as part of the Metro Plan, the 20-Year Capital Investment Actions project lists contained in TransPlan. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. The proposed amendments to the project lists contained in TransPlan will be adopted by reference into the Metro Plan. CONCLUSION The proposed amendments meet all applicable standards and criteria in EC 9.7730(3). 00226377.DOC;2 7 ATTACHMENT B Responses to Testimony and City Council Questions th TransPlan/Metro Plan Amendments: West 11 Avenue between Terry Street and Greenhill Road Following the public hearing on October 19, 2009, the Mayor and City Council requested responses to testimony and to several specific questions. Has staff had conversations with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)? 1. Yes, City staff has met with the Bureau of Land Management and a few other natural resources agencies th regarding the W. 11 Avenue project including the Army Corps of Engineers and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. During this meeting, the BLM provided maps and other documentation regarding species of concern. Staff concurs that these present environmental constraints could potentially affect ultimate project design. However, the project could potentially be constructed completely within ODOT’s 80-foot right of way and there is no reason to presume that natural th resources issues would prevent a road improvement project from being implemented on W. 11 Avenue. As owners of property adjacent to the right of way and as a regulatory agency, BLM will be involved in facility planning and environmental review. Staff from BLM and the other agencies expressed appreciation for having an opportunity to meet with City and ODOT staff th regarding the potential project on W. 11 Avenue and requested that they be involved in future processes for planning any improvements to this street. May the Council see maps of the project area? 2.Yes. They have been provided with this memorandum. Is the City “operating on policy direction that has shifted”? 3. No. TransPlan’s adopted objectives encourage improved mobility, increased safety, and environmental responsibility. th Properties along West 11 Avenue are designated for development (with recognition that some properties have been provided with additional protection for natural resources). The adopted policies in TransPlan and the Metro Plan also encourage higher density nodal development throughout the urban growth boundary (including two Potential Nodal Development Areas along th West 11 Avenue west of Terry Street) and the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian improvements th necessary to serve them along this corridor. Currently, west of Terry Street, West 11 has no pedestrian, bicycle or transit facilities. This project would allow the possibility to extend th pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities to this underdeveloped area. This section of West 11 Avenue continues to be a state highway and will continue to feel the pressure of increased traffic as the region grows. The City’s Growth Management Policies support growth in this area. Here are three examples: Policy 1 Support the existing Eugene Urban Growth Boundary by taking actions to increase density and use existing vacant land and under-used land within the boundary more efficiently. Policy 11 Increase the use of alternative modes of transportation by improving the capacity, design, safety, and convenience of the transit, bicycle, and pedestrian transportation systems. Policy 13 Focus future street improvements on relieving pressure on the City’s most congested roadways and intersections to maintain an acceptable level of mobility for all modes of transportation. The City Council’s only policy change in this arena has been to halt support of the West Eugene Parkway. It can be argued that without the West Eugene Parkway, additional pressure will be th placed on West 11 Avenue, increasing the need for street improvements proposed by this project description. Through its initiation of these TransPlan amendments and support of the West Eugene Collaborative (WEC) process, the Council has continued to explore transportation options in west Eugene while accommodating planned growth. The Council has adopted no new policy to reduce development potential in west Eugene. Would placement of this project on the Financially Constrained list allow development 4. that would then mandate large street improvements? In other words, “is the cart before the horse?” Staff does not believe so. Both transportation planning and land use planning in west Eugene are proceeding according to adopted, integrated plans. Current land use designations and th zoning allow considerable additional development proximate to West 11 Avenue. Public facilities (e.g., sanitary sewer) are being extended to support this planned growth. Growth (and th traffic) are also likely to continue increasing in areas west of the city. The West 11 Avenue project description has been revised, to remove any inherent assumptions about the future capacity and number of travel lanes of the improved roadway, thereby allowing the project study to proceed cautiously and prudently. Whereas the Regional Transportation Plan and current TransPlan description of the project is “Upgrade to 5-lane urban facility”, the proposed TransPlan description is “Upgrade to urban facility.” Placement of this project on the Financially Constrained list increases the chances for state funding for an ODOT facility planning process that will provide a conceptual project design. As with other facility plans, such th as that underway for Beltline, the facility plan for W. 11 would only become official if approved by the Council. It is not expected that this TransPlan amendment will result in any improvements being installed th in this segment of West 11 Avenue before other local planning endeavors are further along (e.g., comprehensive land assessment, Opportunity Siting). By moving this project to the constrained list, the Council will increase the chances that state funds could be applied to a facility planning study at an earlier date, which would help keep pace with projected growth. Is this proposal consistent with the WEC’s recommendations? 5. Staff believes so. The th WEC did not make specific recommendations for this section of West 11 Avenue between Terry Street and Green Hill Road, but it recognized the existence of this study. The WEC th recommended significant improvement to West 11 east of Beltline and recommended further study west of this project boundary, all the way to Veneta. From the WEC’s Final Report: “The medium term (within ten years) ideas are estimated in the range of $45 Improvements to West 11th million to $65 million, or about 25% of the budget. Avenue, from Terry St. to Greenhill Road, are being studied by the City and those improvements are currently budgeted at $20 million. The majority of the 2 WEC’s proposed financial investment would be made along West 11th Avenue from Garfield to Beltline via the construction of a multiway boulevard (over a period of 15 to 35 years).” ***** “Finally, the majority of our work has been on our area of focus, which is around West 11th from Chambers to Green Hill Road, but it should not be assumed that Our area of interest most our concern lies only within those boundaries. certainly would extend west all the way to Veneta, and theWEC is fully supportive and recommends that efforts currently underway to enhance transportation, land use and the environment along that corridor be a top priority. To that end, the WEC has already supported an effort for funding a full analysis of that corridor and encourages the completion of that analysis.” Emphasis ( added by City staff) The WEC recommended studying how to make OR126 function better from Green Hill Road to Veneta. Both this section of OR126 and W. 11th from Terry to Green Hill are two lane facilities. It only makes sense to study OR126 to Veneta if there would also be a study of the closer in section east of Green Hill Road and one of the best ways to increase the chances of such a study taking place is to move the W. 11th project to the Financially Constrained list in TransPlan. How does the timing of this project relate to the changes in the federal Endangered 6. th Species Act? Testimony was provided at the public hearing that the addition of this West 11 Avenue project to TransPlan occurred only a few weeks before changes to the federal law in th 2007. The West 11 project has been included in TransPlan as an “Arterial Capacity Improvement” or “Upgrade to 5-lane urban facility” on the Project map and Future Projects list, respectively, since at least 2002, when the latest version of TransPlan was adopted. The Council action in 2007 was to initiate the move of the project from the Future Roadway Projects list to the Financially Constrained Roadway Projects list in TransPlan in order to make TransPlan consistent with the RTP Can the City Council act on the two transportation projects separately? 7. Yes. The th Council may direct staff to modify the ordinance so that action on the West 11 Avenue project listing may occur separately from the North Eugene Transportation Improvements. 3 ÌÑæ Û«¹»²» ß·®°±®¬ ÌÑæ Í¿´»³ ᮬ´¿²¼ × ó ïðë ÉÛÍÌ ÛËÙÛÒÛ ÉÛÌÔßÒÜÍ ÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒ ÌÎßÒÍ×Ì ÍÌßÌ×ÑÒ ÌÑæ Ú»®² η¼¹» λ»®ª±·®ô Ê»²»¬¿ô ¿²¼ Ú´±®»²½» ËÒ×ÊÛÎÍ×ÌÇ ÌÑæ Þ»²¼ ÑÚ ÑÎÛÙÑÒ ÌÑæ ÝßÓÐËÍ Î±»¾«®¹ ðëððïððð Ú»»¬ Þ»´¬´·²» α¿¼æ 窻® α¿¼ ¬± Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ Û«¹»²»ô ÑÎ ÌÑæ Û«¹»²» ß·®°±®¬ ÌÑæ Í¿´»³ ᮬ´¿²¼ × ó ïðë ÉÛÍÌ ÛËÙÛÒÛ ÉÛÌÔßÒÜÍ ÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒ ÌÎßÒÍ×Ì ÍÌßÌ×ÑÒ ÌÑæ Ú»®² η¼¹» λ»®ª±·®ô Ê»²»¬¿ô ¿²¼ Ú´±®»²½» ËÒ×ÊÛÎÍ×ÌÇ ÌÑæ Þ»²¼ ÑÚ ÑÎÛÙÑÒ ÌÑæ ÝßÓÐËÍ Î±»¾«®¹ ðëððïððð Ú»»¬ É»¬ ïטּ ߪ»²«»æ Ì»®®§ ͬ®»»¬ ¬± Ù®»»² Ø·´´ α¿¼ Û«¹»²»ô ÑÎ Ö Ê Ó × Î Ø É Í Ö × Ç Õ × Î × íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ Ù Í ñÇÊÈ ã×ÓÈ×Ê å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× íÊ×ÕÍÎ ÑÇÊÈÏÃ×ÓÈ×ÊüÙÓ×ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÇÉ ê× è×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ÖÍÊ ìÇÚÐÓÙ ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ óÈ×Ï ÍÎ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ åÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ø×ÛÊ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ÛÎØ ùÓÈà éÈÛÖÖ èÔÛÎÑ ÃÍÇ ÖÍÊ Ê×Ù×ÓÆÓÎÕ ÈÔÓÉ È×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ÍÎ Û ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÍÊØÓÎÛÎÙ× ÈÍ ÏÍÆ× ÈÅÍ ÊÍÛØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ× öÇÈÇÊ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× öÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÐà ùÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×Ø ÐÓÉÈ ÛÎØ ÛÏ×ÎØ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ îÍ å ÈÔ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÖÊÍÏ õÊ××Î ôÓÐÐ êÍÛØ ÈÍ è×ÊÊà éÈÊ××È ÛÎØ îÍ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÖÊÍÏ êÓÆ×Ê êÍÛØ ÈÍ ø×ÐÈÛ ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÷ÇÕ×Î× lÐ× ïû éÌ×ÙÓlÙÛÐÐà öÊÓ×ÎØÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÉ Û ÎÍÎÌÊÍlÈ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÛÎØ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÅÛÈÙÔØÍÕ ÍÊÕÛÎÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÉ Å×ÐÐ ÛÉ ó ÛÉ Û ÌÊÓÆÛÈ× ÓÎØÓÆÓØÇÛÐ ÖÍÊ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×É ÍÖ ÉÈÛÎØÓÎÕ ÅÓÉÔ ÈÍ ÍÌÌÍÉ× ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐ ÈÍ ÌÇÉÔ ÇÌ ÈÔ× ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÊÍÛØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÈÍ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ðà ØÍÇÚÐ× ÈÔ× ÅÓØÈÔ ÍÖ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ Ú×ÈÅ××Î è×ÊÊà ÛÎØ õÊ××ÎÔÓÐÐ èÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× É×Æ×ÊÛÐ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉ ÎÍÈ ÈÍ ÇÌÕÊÛØ× ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎ ÉÈÛÈÇÉ ÍÖ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÛÈ ÈÔÓÉ ÈÓÏ× èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÇÈÉ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×Ø ÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÖÍÊ Û Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà ÐÓÉÈ×Ø ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É èÔÓÉ ÓÉ ÉÓÏÌÐà ÈÔ× ÔÓÕÔ×ÉÈ Ð×Æ×Ð ÍÖ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÍÊ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÍÇÊ ÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÉÃÉÈ×ÏxÃ×È ÈÍ ØÛÈ× ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÇÚÐÓÙ åÍÊÑÉ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÔÛÉ ÚÛÊ×Ðà ÕÓÆ×Î ÓÈ ÎÍÈÓÙ× Ð×È ÛÐÍÎ× ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÓÈ ÓÎ ÛÎà ÉÓÕÎÓlÙÛÎÈ ÅÛà èÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÎÍ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÆ× lÎØÓÎÕÉ ÍÊ ÍÈÔ×Ê ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÏÛØ× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÈÔÛÈ ÒÇÉÈÓl×É ÈÔ× Î××Ø ÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉ ÊÍÛØ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÓÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÍÖ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× ÓÉ ÓÎ ØÓÊ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÛØÓÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÍ ÈÔ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ× ÆÓÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÎÕ ÓÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÙÐÍÉ×Ê ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ÙÍÊ× èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÍÇÈ ÍÖ ÈÇÊÎ ÅÍÇÐØ ÌÊ××ÏÌÈ ÈÔ× ×Æ×ÎÈÇÛÐ ÙÍÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ É×Æ×ÊÛÐ ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÛÊ× ÛÐÊ×ÛØà ÇÎØ×ÊÅÛà èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈx×Æ×Î ÓÎ ÛØÆÛÎÙ× ÍÖ ÛÎà ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÉÈÇØà Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎxÅÍÇÐØ ÛÐÐÍÅ wÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏv Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ ÉÇÊÕ× ÛÔ×ÛØ ÌÊ×ØÓÙÈÛÚÐà ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕ Û ÖÛÓÈÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈxÐ×È ÛÐÍÎ× ÓÈÉ ÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎxÙÛÎ Ú× Ê×ÛØÓÐà ÌÊ×ØÓÙÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÏÓÐ×É ÈÊÛÆ×Ð×Ø ÈÔ× ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈ ÛÎØ ÏÍÉÈ ØÓÖlÙÇÐÈ ÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÓØ× ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ å×tØ ÐÓÑ× ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÉÍÏ× Ø×ÈÛÓÐÉ ÚÛÙÑÓÎÕ ÇÌ ×ÛÙÔ ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× ÌÍÓÎÈÉ ÷ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø éÌ×ÙÓ×É ùÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ôÛÚÓÈÛÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÙÇÈÉ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈ×Ø ÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÖÍÊ Û Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà ÐÓÉÈ×Ø ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×É èÔÓÉ ÓÉ ÉÓÏÌÐà ÈÔ× ÔÓÕÔ×ÉÈ Ð×Æ×Ð ÍÖ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÍÊ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÍÇÊ ÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÉÃÉÈ×ÏxÃ×È ÈÍ ØÛÈ× ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÇÚÐÓÙ åÍÊÑÉ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÔÛÉ ÚÛÊ×Ðà ÕÓÆ×Î ÓÈ ÎÍÈÓÙ× Ð×È ÛÐÍÎ× ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÓÈ ÓÎ ÛÎà ÉÓÕÎÓlÙÛÎÈ ÅÛà èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÊÓÕÔÈ ÍÖ ÅÛà ÈÔÊ×ÛÈ×ÎÉ ÍÖlÙÓÛÐ åÓÐÐÛÏ×ÈÈ× ØÛÓÉà ÙÊÓÈÓÙÛÐ ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ× ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÛÊ× ÌÛÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÊÇÊÛÐ ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×Ê ÍÖ ÍÇÈ×Ê å×ÉÈ ÈÔ óÉ ÈÔÛÈ Ê×ÛÐÐà ÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÓÎ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÅÛÎÈÉ ÈÍ Ú× Ô×ÛØÓÎÕý ùÓÈà ÉÈÛÖÖ ÔÛÆ× ÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÙÍÎÈÊÛØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÏÓÕÔÈ Ú×ÉÈ Ú× ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×Ø Úà ÛØÆÛÎÙÓÎÕ ÓÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ óÎÉÈ×ÛØ öÊÓ×ÎØÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÔÍÌ× ÈÔÛÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÍÖlÙÓÛÐÉ ÙÛÎ ÉÔÍÅ ÈÔ× Ð×ÛØ×ÊÉÔÓÌ Î××Ø×Ø ÈÍ ×ÏÚÊÛÙ× ÈÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÖÛÙÈÉ ÇÌ ÖÊÍÎÈ ÛÎØ ÛÆÍÓØ ÛÎ ×ÄÌ×ÎÉÓÆ× ÛÎØ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊÓÐà ÖÊÇÓÈÐ×ÉÉ Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ×Ä×ÊÙÓÉ× îÍ öÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÍÖ î××Ø èÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÎÍ lÎØÓÎÕÉ ÍÊ ÍÈÔ×Ê ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÏÛØ× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÈÔÛÈ ÒÇÉÈÓl×É ÈÔ× Î××Ø ÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉ ÊÍÛØ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ óÈtÉ Û ÙÐÛÉÉÓÙ ×ÄÛÏÌÐ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÍÇÈØÛÈ×Ø ÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔ ÈÍ ÈÊÛÖlÙ ×ÎÕÓÎ××ÊÓÎÕ ÇÎØ×Ê ÅÔÓÙÔ ÊÍÛØÅÛÃÉ ÛÊ× ÅÓØ×Î×Ø ÛÉ Û ÏÛÈÈ×Ê ÍÖ ÙÍÇÊÉ× ÅÓÈÔ ÐÓÈÈÐ× ÈÔÍÇÕÔÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÙÍÎÉ×ËÇ×ÎÙ×É óÈ ÏÛà Ú× ØÓÖlÙÇÐÈ ÈÍ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÈ× ÛÙÈÇÛÐ Î××Ø ÛÎØ ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÉ Ú×Î×lÈ ÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ x ÓÈ ÒÇÉÈ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÉ ÍÇÈ ÈÍ ÏÓÐ×É ÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÓÙÈ×Ø ÈÅÍÐÛÎ× ÊÇÊÛÐ ÔÓÕÔÅÛà ûÈ ÈÔÓÉ Æ×Êà ÈÓÏ× ÍÇÊ Ð×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÍÊÉ ÛÊ× ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÍÖ ÖÇÎØÓÎÕ Û ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÆ× ÉÈÇØà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÅÔÍÐ× Ð×ÎÕÈÔ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÖÊÍÏ å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÈÍ æ×Î×ÈÛ èÔÛÈ ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÉÈÇØà ÓÖ ØÍÎ× Å×ÐÐ ÓÉ ÐÓÑ×Ðà ÈÍ ÉÔÍÅ ÈÔÓÉ ÊÍÛØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÓÉ ÇÎÎ×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà ×Æ×Î ÖÍÊ ÈÊÛÖlÙ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ûÎØ ÓÖ ÓÈ ÉÔÍÅ×Ø ÍÈÔ×ÊÅÓÉ× ÈÔ×Ê×tÉ ÛÐÅÛÃÉ ÈÓÏ× ÈÍ ÚÇÓÐØ ÈÔ× Î×Å ÐÛÎ×É ÐÛÈ×Ê ÅÔÓÐ× ÓÈ ÓÉ ÆÓÊÈÇÛÐÐà ÓÏÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× ÈÍ ÈÇÊÎ ÈÔ×Ï ÚÛÙÑ ÍÊ ÈÔ×ÓÊ ÛÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ×Ø ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÎÙ× ÈÔ×à ÛÊ× Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×Ø ÛÎØ ÚÇÓÐÈ èÔ× ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÌÊÍÚÐ×ÏÉ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÊ× ÙÐ×ÛÊ ûÊ× ÈÔ×Ê× ÉÇÖlÙÓ×ÎÈÐà ÉÈÊÍÎÕ ÛÎØ ÙÐ×ÛÊ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉ ÊÍÛØ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÈÍ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐÐà ÒÇÉÈÓÖà ÈÛÑÓÎÕ ØÛÎÕ×ÊÍÇÉ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÊÓÉÑÉ ÅÓÈÔ ×ÎØÛÎÕ×Ê×Ø ÉÌ×ÙÓ×Éý ù×ÊÈÛÓÎÐà ÎÍ ÉÇÙÔ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ×ÄÌÊ×ÉÉ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÍÊØ ÈÍ ØÛÈ× ùÍÎÈÊÛØÓÙÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× å÷ù æÓÉÓÍÎ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÓÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÍÖ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× ÓÉ ÓÎ ØÓÊ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÛØÓÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÍ ÈÔ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ× å÷ù ÆÓÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈÓÎÕ ÓÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÙÐÍÉ×Ê ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ÙÍÊ× óÎ ÓÈÉ ÙÍÎÉ×ÎÉÇÉ lÎÛÐ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÈÔ× å÷ù ÓÎÈ×ÎÈÓÍÎÛÐÐà ÙÍÎÙ×ÎÈÊÛÈ×Ø ÓÈÉ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×Ø ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÓÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÛÈ ÛÎØ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ Û Ì×ÊÓÏ×È×Ê Ø×lÎ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× ôÓÕÔÅÛà èÔ× ÚÛÉÓÉ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ×É× ÙÔÍÓÙ×É ÓÉ ÉÔÍÅÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ× å÷ùtÉ ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÆ× ÌÊ×ÙÍÎÉ×ÎÉÇÉ ÅÍÊÑ ÌÊÍØÇÙÈ ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÍÎÐÓÎ× ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ èÔ× å÷ù Ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÛÐÉÍ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉ wø×lÎ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ Ñ×à ÔÛÚÓÈÛÈ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉ ÓÎ Å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÊ×Û ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Å×ÈÐÛÎØÉ ÛØÒÍÓÎÓÎÕ Å×È ÌÊÛÓÊÓ× ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÈÔ ÍÛÑ ÉÛÆÛÎÎÛÔ ÛÎØ ÖÍÊ×ÉÈv ìÊ××ÏÌÈÓÎÕ ùÓÈà ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ çÎØ×ÊÅÛà èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÍÇÈ ÍÖ ÈÇÊÎ ÅÍÇÐØ ÌÊ××ÏÌÈ ÈÔ× ×Æ×ÎÈÇÛÐ ÙÍÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ É×Æ×ÊÛÐ ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÛÊ× ÛÐÊ×ÛØà ÇÎØ×ÊÅÛà èÔ×É× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×É ÓÎ ÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÛÏÍÎÕ ÍÈÔ×ÊÉ ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ùÍÊÊÓØÍÊ éÈÇØà ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÛÎØ ðùíõ ÅÍÊÑ ÌÐÛÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÍ ÇÌØÛÈ× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ æïè ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉ ÈÍÅÛÊØ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÛÙÔÓ×Æ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ûÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ× ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÷Î×ÊÕà ûÙÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ ù÷ûì óÎ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎ ÈÔ× ÔÍÌ×ØÖÍÊ ÉÈÇØà ÍÖ ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÖÊÍÏ å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÈÍ æ×Î×ÈÛ ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÔÓÕÔÐà Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÈÍ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔÓÎÕ ÈÔ× Ê×ÛÐ Î××ØÉ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÙÍÊÊÓØÍÊ ÷ÎÛÚÐÓÎÕ ìÊÍÚÐ×Ï ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈx×Æ×Î ÓÎ ÛØÆÛÎÙ× ÍÖ ÛÎà ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÉÈÇØà Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎxÅÍÇÐØ ÛÐÐÍÅ wÇÌÉÈÊ×ÛÏv Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ ÉÇÊÕ× ÛÔ×ÛØ ÌÊ×ØÓÙÈÛÚÐà ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÎÕ Û ÖÛÓÈÛÙÙÍÏÌÐÓ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ øÛÏÛÕÓÎÕ ÷ÇÕ×Î×tÉ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ïÓÈÓÕÛÈÓÍÎ ÷ÖÖÍÊÈÉ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈÓÂÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈxÐ×È ÛÐÍÎ× ÓÈÉ ÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎxÙÛÎ Ú× Ê×ÛØÓÐà ÌÊ×ØÓÙÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÏÓÐ×É ÈÊÛÆ×Ð×Ø ÈÔ× ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈ ÛÎØ ÏÍÉÈ ØÓÖlÙÇÐÈ ÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃÅÓØ× ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ðÛÎØ ÓÏÏ×ØÓÛÈ×Ðà ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ùÓÈà ÊÓÕÔÈ ÍÖ ÅÛà èÔÓÉ ÓÉ Û È×ÊÊÓÚÐ× ÉÌÊÛÅÐÓÎØÇÙÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Û Ê×ÛÐ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉÚÐÍÛÈ×Ê ÈÔÛÈ ÅÍÇÐØ ÛØØ Î×Å ÐÛÎ× ÏÓÐ×É ÍÖ ÊÍÛØÅÛà ÖÛÊ ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ óÈtÉ ÈÔ× Î×ÄÈ ÉÈ×Ì ÓÎ ÛÎ ÍÚÉÍÐ×È× É×ÊÓ×É ÍÖ ÉÌÊÛÅÐ ØÍÏÓÎÍÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÅÍÇÐØ ÍÌ×Î ÇÌ ÈÔ× Å×ÉÈ×ÊÎ ×ØÕ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× çõú ÖÍÊ Û ÚÓÕ ÚÐÛÉÈ ÍÖ ÓÎÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐ ÓÉ ÙÐ×ÛÊÐà ÙÍÎÈÊÛÊà ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÓÎÈ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ð×ÈÈ×Ê ÍÖ É×Æ×ÊÛÐ ÉÈÛÈ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÕÍÛÐÉ ÛÉ Å×ÐÐ ÛÉ ÙÐ×ÛÊÐà ÙÍÎÈÊÛÊà ÈÍ É×Æ×ÊÛÐ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î×tÉ ÍÅÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÍÖ ÊÇÊÛÐ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ÅÍÇÐØ ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐà ÓÎØÇÙ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ×ÄÛÙÈÐà ÈÔ× ÅÊÍÎÕ ÌÐÛÙ×É ÙÍÎÈÊÛÊà ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉÌÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É óÎlÐÐ ÎÍØÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É ÓÎ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×ÎÉÓÈà ÛÊÍÇÎØ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ×ØÕ× x ÓÎ ÍÇÈÐÃÓÎÕ ÔÓÕÔæïè ÌÛÊÈÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÊ×Û x ÛÊ× ÙÍÇÎÈ×ÊÌÊÍØÇÙÈÓÆ× ÓÎ ÈÔ× É×ÎÉ× ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×à ÙÊ×ÛÈ× ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ Î×ÕÛÈÓÆ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÅÔÓÐ× ÖÛÓÐÓÎÕ ÈÍ ÛÙÔÓ×Æ× ÈÔ× ÌÍÉÓÈÓÆ× ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×É ÍÖ ÓÎlÐÐ õÓÆ×Î ÈÔ× Î×ÕÛÈÓÆ× ÙÍÉÈÚ×Î×lÈ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÈÃÌ× ÍÖ ÓÎlÐÐ ÛÉ Û ÏÛÈÈ×Ê ÍÖ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÍÐÓÙà ÛÎØ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÈ ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÛÆÍÓØ×Ø èÍ ØÓÊ×ÙÈ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ×Ðà ÅÔÓÐ× Ï××ÈÓÎÕ ÉÈÛÈ×ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÈÛÊÕ×ÈÉ ÈÔ× ÌÊÓÍÊÓÈà ÖÍÙÇÉ ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÉÔÓÖÈ×Ø ÛÅÛà ÖÊÍÏ ÓÎlÐÐ ÓÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ÈÍÅÛÊØ ÏÇÐÈÓÉÈÍÊà Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÏÓÄ×ØÇÉ× ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÐÛÊÕ× ÖÊÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÇÊÚÛÎ ÙÍÊ× ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐà ÂÍÎ×Ø ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔà ÓÉ öÇÎØÛÏ×ÎÈÛÐ èÔ× Î×ÕÛÈÓÆ× ÙÐÓÏÛÈ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÍÖ ÍÇÈ×Ê å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÙÛÎ Ì×ÊÔÛÌÉ Ú×ÉÈ Ú× ÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÍØ ÓÎ È×ÊÏÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐ Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔà ÍÖ æïè ÓÎ ÛÎØ ÛÊÍÇÎØ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ûÎØ Å× ÙÛÎtÈ Ê×ÛÐÐà ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ ÈÔ× Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔà ÍÖ æïè ÅÓÈÔÍÇÈ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÖÇÈÇÊ× ÕÊÍÅÈÔ óÎ ÖÛÙÈ ÈÔ× ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÖÇÈÇÊ× ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÓÉ ÈÔ× ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÌÊÓÏÛÊà ÖÛÙÈÍÊ ÈÔÛÈ ÅÓÐÐ ØÊÓÆ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×tÉ ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐ æïè ÇÌÅÛÊØ ÍÊ ØÍÅÎÅÛÊØ ÛÉ ÈÔ× ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É éÓÎÙ× ÈÔ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÙÍØ× ÇÌØÛÈ× ðçùç ÍÖ ÍÇÊ ÐÍÙÛÐ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÔÛÆ× ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ø Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎlÐÐ úÇÈ Å× ÑÎÍÅ ÈÔÛÈ ÛÉ Å×ÐÐ ÛÉ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈÓÎÕ ÉÍÏ× ÛÏÍÇÎÈ ÍÖ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎlÐÐ ÛÐÉÍ ÙÛÇÉ×É ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÎ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ùÐ×ÛÊÐà Å× ÛÊ× ÎÍÈ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕ ÓÎlÐÐ ÖÍÊ ÓÈÉ ÍÅÎ ÉÛÑ× ÚÇÈ ÖÍÊ ÉÌ×ÙÓlÙ ÉÈÛÈ×Ø Ê×ÛÉÍÎÉ óÎlÐÐ ÓÉ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ø ÓÎ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÓÎ ÍÊØ×Ê ÈÍ Ï××È ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà ÕÍÛÐÉ ×ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐÐà ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× Ú×Î×lÈÉ ÍÖ Ø×ÎÉÓlÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÌÛÙÈ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ óÎ ÈÔ× íÊ×ÕÍÎ ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ÈÔ×É× Ú×Î×lÈÉ ÛÊ× ÐÛÊÕ×Ðà ÍÊÕÛÎÓÂ×Ø ÛÊÍÇÎØ ÈÔ× ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ ÛÎØ Ï×ÛÉÇÊÛÚÐ× ÕÍÛÐ ÍÖ Ê×ØÇÙÓÎÕ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×É ÏÓÐ×É ÈÊÛÆ×Ð×Ø æïè åÔÛÈ ÓÖ ÈÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÅÔ×Ê× ÓÈ ÙÛÎ Ú× ÉÔÍÅÎ ÉÃÉÈ×ÏÛÈÓÙÛÐÐà ÈÔÛÈ ÓÎlÐÐ ØÍ×ÉÎtÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ× ÈÍ ÏÍÉÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà Ú×Î×lÈÉ ÍÖ ÙÍÏÌÛÙÈ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÎØ ×Æ×Î ÔÛÉ Î×ÕÛÈÓÆ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÉý óÖ ÈÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÉÇÙÔ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÅÔÛÈ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ× ÅÍÇÐØ Ú× É×ÊÆ×Ø Úà ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕ ÍÊ ÛÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÓÎlÐÐ ÓÎ ÈÔ×Ïý ðÍÙÛÈÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÎÕ ÓÎlÐÐ ÓÉ Û ÚÛÐÛÎÙÓÎÕ ÛÙÈ Ú×ÈÅ××Î ÉÍÏ× Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà Ú×Î×lÈÉ ÍÎ ÍÎ× ÔÛÎØ ÛÎØ ÉÍÏ× ÐÍÙÛÐ ÛÎØ ÙÇÏÇÐÛÈÓÆ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÍÈÔ×Ê ÔÛÎØ åÔ×Ê× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÙÙÇÊÉ ÓÉ ÖÇÎØÛÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÈÍ æïè óÎ ÙÍÊ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ÈÔ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÖ ÓÎÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ× ÓÎlÐÐ ÙÛÎ Ú× É×ÊÓÍÇÉ Ø×ÕÊÛØÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÔÛÊÛÙÈ×Ê ÛÎØ ËÇÛÐÓÈà ÍÖ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ÛÎØ ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐ ÖÛÚÊÓÙÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÛÊ× ÉÍÏ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÕÊ×ÛÈ×ÉÈ ÙÍÐÐ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÛÉÉ×ÈÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× óÎ ×ØÕ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ÈÔ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÖ ÓÎlÐÐ ÙÛÎ ÛÐÉÍ Ú× É×ÊÓÍÇÉ ÐÍÙÑÓÎÕ ÓÎ Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙÛÐÐÃÚÛÉ×Ø ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÛÏÍÇÎÈ ÍÖ ØÊÓÆÓÎÕ Ì×Ê Ì×ÊÉÍÎ ÓÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÅÔ×Ê× ÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ× ÏÍØ×É ÍÖ ÏÍÚÓÐÓÈà ÛÊ× ÛÐÉÍ ØÓÖlÙÇÐÈ ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ×ÖlÙÓ×ÎÈÐà óÈ ÓÉ Å×ÐÐ ÑÎÍÅÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÉÏÛÊÈ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà ÈÔÛÈ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×ÎÉÓÈà È×ÎØÉ ÈÍ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ× ÅÛÐÑÛÚÐ× Ê×ØÇÙ×Øæïè íÇÊ ÕÊ××Î ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà Î××ØÉ ÈÍ ÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÇÎØ×ÊÐÃÓÎÕ ÚÛÉ×É ÖÍÊ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÔ×ÎÍÏ×ÎÍÎ ÛÎØ ÇÉ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÈÍ ØÓÊ×ÙÈ ÛÎØ Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÈÍ Ô×ÐÌ Ê×ØÇÙ× ÊÛÈÔ×Ê ÈÔÛÎ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ øÊÓÆÓÎÕ øÓÉÈÛÎÙ×É ÛÎØ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ× ìÐÛÎÉ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÍÐÓÙà ÛÎØ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÙÍØ× Å× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ ÓÎ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÈÍØÛà ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÛÓÏ×Ø ÛÐÍÎÕ ÅÓÈÔ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÍÚÒ×ÙÈÓÆ×É ÛÈ Ï××ÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÕÍÛÐÉ ÖÍÊ ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÉ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ ×ÎÛÙÈ×Ø ÓÎ íÊ×ÕÍÎ ÐÛÉÈ Ã×ÛÊ ôú ÉÓÕÎ×Ø ÍÎ ûÇÕÇÉÈ ÍÖ Û Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ú×ÐÍÅ Ð×Æ×ÐÉ Úà ÛÎØ Û Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ú×ÐÍÅ Ð×Æ×ÐÉ Úà éÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Î××Ø×Ø èÔ× ÌÊÓÏÛÊà ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÍÊ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÓÉ Ê×ØÇÙ×Ø ØÊÓÆÓÎÕ Ó× Ê×ØÇÙ×Ø æïè ÓÎ ÚÍÈÔ ÈÔ× Ì×Ê ÙÛÌÓÈÛ ÛÎØ ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐ ÈÍÈÛÐ É×ÎÉ× óÎ ÖÛÙÈ ÈÔ× õÍÆ×ÊÎÍÊtÉ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ× óÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈÓÍÎ õÊÍÇÌ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ wê×ØÇÙÓÎÕ æïè ÓÉ ÉÓÏÌÐà ÈÔ× ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÏÍÉÈ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÅÛà ÈÍ Ê×ØÇÙ× ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉv öÓÎÛÐ ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× õÍÆ×ÊÎÍÊ û öÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ÖÍÊ ûØØÊ×ÉÉÓÎÕ êÛÌÓØ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ× éÈÛÈ× ÍÖ íÊ×ÕÍÎ òÛÎÇÛÊÃ Ì èÔ× wõÍÆ×ÊÎÍÊtÉ æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÷ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ åÍÊÑÕÊÍÇÌ ê×ÌÍÊÈv ÎÍÈ×É ÈÔÛÈ wèÔ× íÊ×ÕÍÎ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎtÉ íøíè ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× Î×ÄÈ È×Î Ã×ÛÊÉ ÓÉ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× ÛÎÎÇÛÐ æïè ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÎÍÎÙÍÏÌÍÇÎØ×Ø æïè ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÓÉ Û ÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÎØ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÓÎ æïè Ì×Ê ÙÛÌÓÈÛv îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê Ì èÍ ÛÙÔÓ×Æ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ Å× Î××Ø ÈÍ Ê×ØÇÙ× Ì×ÊÙÛÌÓÈÛ ÇÉÛÕ× Ó× æïè Ø××ÌÐà ×ÎÍÇÕÔ ÈÍ ÙÍÇÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈ ÈÔ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈ ÍÖ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ åÔÓÐ× ÈÔ× ÐÛÈ×ÉÈ ÙÐÓÏÛÈ× ÉÙÓ×ÎÙ× ÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ Û Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÓÉ ÌÊÍÚÛÚÐà ÎÍÈ Û Ø××Ì ×ÎÍÇÕÔ ÙÇÈ ÈÍ ÉÈÛÚÓÐÓÂ× ÈÔ× ÕÐÍÚÛÐ ÙÐÓÏÛÈ× ÈÔÛÈ ÕÍÛÐ ÓÉ ÖÛÊ ×ÎÍÇÕÔ ÛÅÛà ÈÔÛÈ ÓÎÔ×Ê×ÎÈ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÇÎÙ×ÊÈÛÓÎÈÓ×É ÏÛÑ× ÈÔ× ØÓÖÖ×Ê×ÎÙ× Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×Ðà ÇÎÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÉÔÍÊÈ È×ÊÏ óÖ Å× ÙÛÎ ÌÐÛÎ ÎÍÅ ÖÍÊ ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÉÈ×ÌÉ ÈÍ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÉÈÛÈ×ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÛÎØ ÕÍÛÐÉ Å× ÅÓÐÐ ÛÈ Ð×ÛÉÈ Ú× Ô×ÛØ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÊÓÕÔÈ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎ û ÚÊÍÛØÐà ÛÙÙ×ÌÈ×Ø ÕÇÓØÓÎÕ ÌÊÓÎÙÓÌÐ× ÖÍÊ ÕÊ××ÎÔÍÇÉ× ÕÛÉ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÓÉ ÈÔÛÈ ×ÛÙÔ É×ÙÈÍÊ ÉÔÍÇÐØ ÌÐÛÎ ÈÍ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ× ÓÈÉ ÍÅÎ ÉÔÛÊ× ÍÖ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ öÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÊÓÎÙÓÌÐ× ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ É×ÙÈÍÊ ÓÈÉ×ÐÖ ÉÔÍÇÐØ ÈÛÊÕ×È ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÏÛÈÙÔÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ×ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É èÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ É×ÙÈÍÊ Ô×ÛÆÓÐà ØÍÏÓÎÛÈ×Ø Úà ÌÊÓÆÛÈ× ÏÍÈÍÊ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ×É Ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ ÛÚÍÇÈ ÔÛÐÖ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÈÍÈÛÐ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ûÐÐ ÙÊ×ØÓÚÐ× ÛÎÛÐÃÉ×É ÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈ ÈÔÛÈ ÌÊ×ØÓÙÈÛÚÐ× ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÚÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÓÎÎÍÆÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× È×ÙÔÎÍÐÍÕÓ×É ÚÓÍÖÇ×ÐÉ ÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê ×Î×ÊÕà ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÛÎØ ØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎÉ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ× ÉÇÚÉÈÛÎÈÓÛÐÐà ÚÇÈ ÎÍÈ Î×ÛÊÐà ×ÎÍÇÕÔ ÈÍ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÕÍÛÐÉ èÔ×Ê× ÓÉ Û Æ×Êà ÉÈÊÍÎÕ ÓÎÈ×ÊÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ØÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔ æïè èÔ× ÐÛÊÕ×ÉÈ ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ÍÖ æïè ÅÓÈÔ Ê×ÕÛÊØ ÈÍ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÓÉ ÈÔ× ØÓÉÈÛÎÙ× Ú×ÈÅ××Î ×ÛÙÔ ØÅ×ÐÐÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ Ù×ÎÈ×Ê ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×ÎÉÓÈà ÛÉ ÉÇÙÔ ÛÎØ ÅÛÐÑÛÚÐ× ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ Ö××È ÈÍ ÖÇÐÐ É×ÊÆÓÙ× lÄ×Ø ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÛÊ× ÓÏÌÍÊÈÛÎÈ É×ÙÍÎØÛÊà ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÉ ðùíõ ÈÊÛÖlÙ ÉÈÇØÓ×É ÔÛÆ× ÙÍÎlÊÏ×Ø ÈÔ× Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙ ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎ ÍÖ æïè ÓÎ È×ÊÏÉ ÍÊ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÐÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ èÔ× æïè Ì×Ê ÙÛÌÓÈÛ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÙÓÈà Ù×ÎÈ×Ê ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÓÉ Ð×ÉÉ ÈÔ×Î ÔÛÐÖ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× èÔ×Ê× ÓÉ ÛÎ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÛÚÍÇÈ ÏÓØÅÛà Ú×ÈÅ××Î ÈÔ× ÙÓÈà Ù×ÎÈ×Ê ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà íÇÈ ÛÈ ÈÔ× ÇÊÚÛÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà æïè ÆÛÊÓ×É ÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ÍÊ ÏÍÊ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ ïÍÊ× ÉÌ×ÙÓlÙÛÐÐà Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎlÐÐ ÛÎØ ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÍÈÔ×Ê ×ØÕ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÛÊ× ÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø íçèéóø÷ ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÛÎØ ÖÛÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔÛÎ t ÖÊÍÏ ÖÇÐÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ× lÄ×Ø ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÓÐÐ È×ÎØ ÈÍ óîùê÷ûé÷ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè Ì×Ê ÙÛÌÓÈÛ ûÎØ ÓÎ ÙÍÎÈÊÛÉÈ ÍÈÔ×Ê Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÉÇÙÔ ÛÉ ÏÇÐÈÓÉÈÍÊà Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÏÓÄ×Ø ÇÉ× ÅÔÓÙÔ ÓÉ ÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø óîéóø÷ ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÅÓÐÐ È×ÎØ ÈÍ ø÷ùê÷ûé÷ ÈÔ× ÍÆ×ÊÛÐÐ ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè Ì×Ê ÙÛÌÓÈÛ ê×ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÎÕ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÛÅÛà ÖÊÍÏ ÓÎlÐÐ ÛÎØ ÓÎÈÍ Ø×ÎÉ× ÏÇÐÈÓÉÈÍÊà ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÏÓÄ×Ø ÓÎ ÙÍÊ× ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ Û ÔÇÕ× ÛÎØ ÆÓÈÛÐ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ÈÍ Ê×ØÇÙ× Ì×ÊÙÛÌÓÈÛ æïè ×Æ×Î ÛÉ ÍÇÊ Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ×É ÈÍ ÕÊÍÅ ÓÎ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ûÉ ÉÓÎÙ× ÔÛÉ Ú××Î ÅÓØ×Ðà ÍÚÉ×ÊÆ×Ø Úà ÙÐÓÏÛÈ× ×ÄÌ×ÊÈÉ Å× Î××Ø ÈÍ ØÍ ÷æ÷êãèôóîõ ÈÔÛÈ Å× Ö×ÛÉÓÚÐà ÙÛÎ ÈÍ ÐÍÅ×Ê ÍÇÊ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Å× Î××Ø ÈÍ ÈÛÑ× ÛØÆÛÎÈÛÕ× ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÉÔÍÅ ÈÔÛÈ æïè Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÎÕ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÈÍ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× ×ÉÉ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎ Ê×ÛÐÓÉÈÓÙ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÈÍ Ï××È ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ×ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÕÍÛÐÉ éÍÏ× ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÐÛÊÕ× ÛÎØ ÉÏÛÐÐ ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÌÛÈÓÚÐ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎlÐÐ ÉÈÓÐÐ Ê×ÏÛÓÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÐÛÊÕ× ÛÊ×Û ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ åÓÈÔ ÖÇÐÐ ÛÎØ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÈÍ ÉÛÖ×ÕÇÛÊØ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ÈÔ×É× ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÙÛÎ Ú× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ø ÅÔÓÐ× ÛÙÈÇÛÐÐà ÓÏÌÊÍÆÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÃtÉ ÙÛÊÚÍÎ ÖÍÍÈÌÊÓÎÈ úÇÈ ÈÔ×à ÛÊ× ÍÎÐà ÐÓÑ×Ðà ÈÍ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ× Û ÉÏÛÐÐ ÖÊÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ èÔ× Ê×ÛÐ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ÛÊÊÓÉ×É ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÐÛÊÕ× ÖÊÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÐÛÎØ ÓÎÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÓÉ ÂÍÎ×Ø ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÓÎlÐÐ Ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ Û Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×Ðà ÉÏÛÐÐ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ÖÍÊ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈÓÎÕ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÅÔÓÐ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÏÓÄ×Ø ÇÉ× ÓÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÐÃÂÍÎ×Ø ÛÊ×ÛÉ Ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ Û Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ×Ðà ÐÛÊÕ× ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà óÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÎ Û ÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÉÙÛÐ× ÉÇÕÕ×ÉÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÓÕÔËÇÛÐÓÈà ÏÇÐÈÓÖÛÏÓÐà ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÓÉ ÇÎØ×Ê ÉÇÌÌÐÓ×Ø Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ× ÈÍ Ø×ÏÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÈÊ×ÎØÉ ÅÔÓÐ× Ø×ÈÛÙÔ×Ø ÉÓÎÕÐ× ÖÛÏÓÐà ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÓÉ ÍÆ×ÊÉÇÌÌÐÓ×Ø Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÏÛÊÑ×È Ø×ÏÛÎØ èÔÓÉ ÎÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ Ì×ÊÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÍÎ ÈÔ× Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ× Î××Ø ÖÍÊ ÆÛÊÓÍÇÉ ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÈÃÌ×É ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÙÍÎlÊÏ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ× ÷ùðû ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÛÐÍÎÕ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÆÛÊÓÍÇÉ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÛÎØ Ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ÍÖ ÐÛÎØ ÐÍÈ ÈÃÌ×É ÛÎØ ÂÍÎÓÎÕ ÓÎÉÓØ× ÛÎØ ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ× ûæïèù ìÍÉÓÈÓÆ× ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ óÎÉÈ×ÛØ ÍÖ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÊÇÊÛÐ å×ÉÈ ÈÔ ÈÍ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ÉÌÊÛÅÐ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ×ØÕ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× çõú ÛÎØ ×Æ×ÎÈÇÛÐÐà Ú×ÃÍÎØ Å× ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÈÛÑÓÎÕ ÌÍÉÓÈÓÆ× ÉÈ×ÌÉ ÈÍ ÕÊÍÅ ÛÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕ ÈÍ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÐÍÙÛÐ ÕÍÛÐÉ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÉ ÇÎØ×ÊÉÈÍÍØ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÐÓÕÔÈ ÍÖ ÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ× Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕ ÙÐÓÏÛÈ× ÙÔÛÎÕ× û èÍ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ× ÍÎÕÍÓÎÕ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÓÎ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÖÇÐlÐÐ ÈÔ× Ø×ÉÓÊ× ÖÍÊ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É Å× ÉÔÍÇÐØ ÖÍÙÇÉ ÍÎ Ê×ÛÐÓÂÓÎÕ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÓÎÈ×ÎÉÓÆ× Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÏÓÄ×ØÇÉ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐÐà ÂÍÎ×Ø ÙÍÊ× ÛÊ×ÛÉ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ ú å× ÉÔÍÇÐØ ÛÐÉÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÓÎlÐÐ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÖÍÊ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÈÊÛØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Î×ÓÕÔÚÍÊÔÍÍØÉ ÛÎØ ÖÍÊ Ê×ÏÛÓÎÓÎÕ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÛÉ ÈÔ×É× ÓÊÊ×ÌÐÛÙ×ÛÚÐ× ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈà ÛÉÉ×ÈÉ ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ×Ø ÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ× ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉÓÎÕ ÊÓÉÑ ÍÖ ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÙÍÊ× Ø×ÎÉÓÈà ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ×É ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ÈÛÑ×Î ÈÍ ÏÓÎÓÏÓÂ× ÛÎØ ÌÊ×Æ×ÎÈ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Ø×ÎÉÓlÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× æïè ÙÍÎÈÍÇÊ ÉÇÙÔ ÛÉ Û ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÓÍÎ ÍÎ ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÊÍÛØÚÇÓÐØÓÎÕ ÍÊ ÅÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Û ÌÊÍÔÓÚÓÈÓÍÎ ÍÎ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ ÈÔÛÈ ÇÊÚÛÎ ÖÊÓÎÕ× ÛÊ×Û éÇÙÔ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÏÛà ÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÐÓÏÓÈÓÎÕ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ× ûæïèù ÈÍ ê ×ÄÙ×ÌÈ ÖÍÊ ÖÇÐÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÛÆÍÓØÓÎÕ ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÌÛÊÈÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÉÇÚØÓÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÔÓÕÔ æïè ÛÊ×Û ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÍÖ ÖÇÐÐÉ×ÊÆÓÙ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÛÎØ Ê×ÈÓÊÓÎÕ ÎÍØÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÌÐÛÎÉ ÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ× ûæïèù ÅÔ×Ê× ÉÏÛÊÈ ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÅÍÇÐØ Ú× ÛÎÃÈÔÓÎÕ ÚÇÈ û ÅÓØ×ÐÃÊ×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×Ø Ñ×à ÐÓÈÏÇÉ È×ÉÈ ÖÍÊ ÍÖ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÊÍÛØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÍØÛà ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÎÍ Î×Å ÐÛÎ×ÏÓÐ×É ÍÖ ÊÍÛØ óÎ ÐÓÕÔÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÖÛÙÈÚÛÉ×Ø ÌÊ×ÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎ ÈÔÛÈ Î×Å ÊÍÛØÉ ÛÊ× Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÚÐà ÛÎØ ÓÎ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÙÐÓÏÛÈ×ÚÇÉÈ×ÊÉ ÖÍÊ ÛÎà Î×Å ÐÛÎ×ÏÓÐ×É ÍÖ ÊÍÛØ ÈÍ Ú× ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÖÇÎØÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÏÇÉÈ ÌÛÉÉ ÈÔ× Æ×Êà ÔÓÕÔ×ÉÈ Ð×Æ×ÐÉ ÍÖ ÉÙÊÇÈÓÎà ÛÎÛÐÃÉÓÉ ÛÎØ Ê×ÆÓ×Å èÔÓÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÔÛÉ ÎÍÈ å× ÙÛÎÎÍÈ ÛÖÖÍÊØ ÈÍ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÈÔ× ÊÍÛØÉ Å×tÆ× ÛÐÊ×ÛØà ÚÇÓÐÈ ÎÍÊ ÙÛÎ Å× ÛÖÖÍÊØ ÈÔ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÈÊÛÖlÙ ÇÌÍÎ ÈÔ×Ï ôÍÅ ÙÛÎ Å× ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐà ÛÖÖÍÊØ ÈÍ ÔÛÎÕ ÛÎà ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÛÐÚÛÈÊÍÉÉ×É ÛÊÍÇÎØ ÍÇÊ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ Î×ÙÑÉý ê×ÉÌ×ÙÈÖÇÐÐà ñ×ÆÓÎ ïÛÈÈÔ×ÅÉ ìÊ×ÉÓØ×ÎÈ öÊÓ×ÎØÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÏÛÈÈÔ×ÅÉüÛÊÈÓlÙ×ÙÍÏ ìí úÍÄ ÷ÇÕ×Î× íê ÆÍÄ ÖÛÄ ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ×É wõÊÍÅÓÎÕ ùÍÍÐ×Êv çÊÚÛÎ ðÛÎØ óÎÉÈÓÈÇÈ× éÈÛÈ× ÍÖ íÊ×ÕÍÎ ×ÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ð×ÕÓÉÐÛÈÓÍÎ ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× õÍÆ×ÊÎÍÊtÉ ùÐÓÏÛÈ× ùÔÛÎÕ× èÛÉÑ öÍÊÙ× wû î×Å æÓÉÓÍÎ ÖÍÊ å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î×v èÔ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍÐÐÛÚÍÊÛÈÓÆ× ïÛÊÙÔ ìÛÕ× ÍÖ ÅÅÅöÊÓ×ÎØÉÍÖ÷ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÕ ATTACHMENT E M I N U T E S Eugene City Council Public Hearing Council Chamber 777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon October 19, 2009 7:30 p.m. COUNCILORS PRESENT: Alan Zelenka, Mike Clark, George Brown, George Poling, Chris Pryor, Jennifer Solomon, Betty Taylor. COUNCILORS ABSENT: Andrea Ortiz. Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. 1. PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance Amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) to Move Project Nos. 333 and 506 from the Future Roadway Projects List to the Financially Con- strained Roadway Projects List, to Update the Project Descriptions for Project Nos. 333 and 506 and to Make Related Amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. City Manager Jon Ruiz stated that the amendment would move two Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) th West 11 Avenue projects from the future projects list to the fiscally constrained list in TransPlan in accordance with a work plan approved by the joint elected officials and the Land Conservation and Development Commission in order to achieve compliance with State planning requirements. The council was scheduled to take action on the amendment th at its November 9 meeting. Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and reviewed the procedures for providing testimony. She noted that several people had submitted written testimony on the matter. Pat Johnston, representing the Bureau of Lane Management (BLM), read testimony that had been submitted in th writing. She said BLM was concerned about activities related to the widening of West 11 Avenue between Green Hill Road and Terry Street, which had the potential to affect land and water conservation properties in the West Eugene wetlands and impact threatened and endangered species on BLM-administered lands. She said the proposed widening project would cross critical habitat for the Willamette daisy, which was protected under the federal Endangered Species Act. She said BLM could not allow any disturbance on BLM surfaces outside the City right-of- way in critical habitat and there could be issues related to how the road improvements would affect hydrology on the adjacent BLM-administered wetlands. th Jeff Musgrove , Bryceler Drive, Eugene, stated that his family owned two cemeteries on West 11 Avenue and he th supported the amendment. He said the intersection of West 11 Avenue and Terry Street was substandard and MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2009 Page 1 Public Hearing urgently needed the improvements planned in Project No. 333. He said adoption of the amendment would not impede th ongoing planning efforts for portions of West 11 Avenue to the east of the project. Kevin Matthews , president of Friends of Eugene, stated that the project was included in TransPlan just prior to the formal designation of critical habitat by relevant federal agencies. He said the relationship of critical habitat to the project was subsequently missed because the environmental screening maps only showed critical habitat for salmon- related issues. He said the project should not move forward and would not be built. He said advancing the priority of the project would allow development projects to use it as a planned transportation facility and it should not be placed on the fiscally constrained list until the environmental work was completed. He briefly reviewed his written testimony, which listed six categories of reasons the project should not advance. Mayor Piercy closed the hearing and called for comments from councilors. Councilor Brown asked if the council could vote separately on the two projects included in the amendment. City Attorney Emily Jerome said staff would prepare separate motions. Councilor Zelenka asked that staff provide maps of the terrain showing critical habitat and environmental work that remained to be done when the amendment came before the council for action. He also asked for information on how the projects would reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Mayor Piercy asked staff to also provide information on discussions that had taken place with BLM and whether the amendment was based on a policy direction that had shifted over time. She questioned whether the amendment was being proposed prematurely. 2. PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance Concerning Time Extensions for Approved Developments; and Providing an Effective Date Mr. Ruiz explained that the ordinance would provide a one-time automatic three-year time extension for approved land use applications that had not yet expired. As a part of the City’s economic stimulus efforts the proposal would allow projects that had already undergone an extensive public process and received City approval more time to be completed. He said council action on the item was scheduled for November 9. Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and reviewed the procedures for providing testimony. Jared Mason-Gere, Willamette Street, Eugene, representing the Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce, stated that the building industry was facing difficult financial times because of the economic downturn and a shortage of lenders, tenants and buyers. He said implementing the ordinance would not cost the City and would benefit a large number of people in the community. He said adoption of the ordinance would send a positive, business-friendly message to the community and those who were struggling financially. Phil Farrington, Monroe Street, Eugene, representing the Lane County Home Builders Association, expressed support for the ordinance. He said the planning process was rigorous and local economic conditions needed to be given consideration by allowing developers who had completed that process and secured approval additional time to finish their projects. He said other communities had enacted similar ordinances to help provide support during difficult financial periods and rejecting the proposal would cause hardship. He urged the council to approve the ordinance as nothing was better than the gift of time. MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2009 Page 2 Public Hearing Mayor Piercy closed the hearing and called for comments from councilors. Councilor Zelenka asked why the extension had changed from the initial proposal of two years to a three-year period. Gabe Flock, Planning Division, replied that the Planning Commission had considered testimony presented to it during a public hearing on the ordinance and recommended expanding the extension from two years to three years. He said the original proposal was based on State legislation that would have extended applications or permit approvals for a two-year period, but the Planning Commission chose to expand that based on testimony and evidence of the continuing economic downturn. He said the State legislation did not pass because of concerns related to Home Rule, but several jurisdictions had taken local action to grant extensions. Councilor Zelenka asked if other jurisdictions had granted two- or three-year extensions. Mr. Flock replied that it varied among jurisdictions and most had several different expiration periods based on the type of permit. Staff would provide that information to the council. Mayor Piercy affirmed the City’s long-term commitment to economic development. 3. PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance Concerning Citation Authority of University of Oregon Department of Public Safety and Amending Section 4.035 of the Eugene Code, 1971 Mr. Ruiz said the code amendment would increase citation authority for the University of Oregon Department of Public Safety (DPS) officers to enforce misdemeanors on University property, in addition to the authority they received in 2003. He said misdemeanors, unlike violations, were crimes for which the offenders could potentially be sentenced to jail or assessed fines. The amendment would streamline services, freeing Eugene police for other calls for service and reducing the number of officers assigned to the University. Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and reviewed the procedures for providing testimony. st Malcolm Wilson, East 21 Avenue, Ward 3, Eugene, representing South University Neighbors, stated that the neighborhood association favored the amendment, which would reduce duplication of services between DPS and the Eugene Police Department (EPD) and keep more Eugene officers on City streets and allow DPS officers to respond more effectively on campus. Both departments would be better able to preserve quality of life on campus and in the neighborhoods. He said South University Neighbors joined EPD in supporting the proposed code change. Emma Kallaway , Orchard Street, Eugene, University of Oregon student body president spoke in support of the code amendments. She said felt the amendment would help build more positive relationships between students and DPS and benefits of the code change included allowing DPS officers to operate more efficiently by being able to issue citations without having to wait for a Eugene police officer, then move on to other campus duties. She said it was important to work within the University’s conduct code and giving DPS more enforcement authority would allow them more leeway when dealing with students. She said of particular importance to students was allowing DPS officers to escort off campus quickly any unwelcome non-students who violated a trespassing code. She urged the council to adopt the ordinance so that DPS officers could focus on crime prevention and use their time as wisely as possible while supporting University students. Phil Farrington, Monroe Street, Eugene, representing PeaceHealth and the University Small Business Association, supported the ordinance. He said passage of the ordinance would allow EPD resources to be better spent elsewhere MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2009 Page 3 Public Hearing in the community. He commended the efforts of EPD and the University to craft a strategy that met public safety objectives in the most efficient manner possible and benefited the entire community, as well as those who lived and shopped in the University area. Paul Shang , Wendover Street, Eugene, assistant vice president of student affairs and dean of students at the University of Oregon, spoke on behalf of the University. He asked for the council’s support of the ordinance to grant enhanced citation authority to DPS officers. He said the ordinance was in the best interests of everyone concerned as it would free Eugene police officers for other service and allow campus officers to cite and release individuals, instead of detaining them until an EPD officer arrived. He said it would enable the University to take enforcement action oriented to the campus environment and aid students by allowing DPS officers to enforce the misdemeanors that impacted students – theft and trespass being high among them. He said student government and student leadership were involved in the development of the ordinance, which had a high level of student support. He thanked the council for its time and consideration. th Doug Tripp , East 15 Avenue, Eugene, University of Oregon director of public safety, said the ordinance modifica- tion being sought by DPS and EPD was very important for both the City and the University. It was the next logical step in the University’s efforts to shoulder a greater burden to address crimes and violations on campus and in the edge of campus area. He said expansion of DPS officers’ citation authority to include certain misdemeanor offenses would help the University be more effective in responding to the needs of students, faculty, staff and guests by being able to direct immediate response to criminal activity on campus. EPD would gain greater efficiencies through elimination of the duplication that had existed. He submitted written testimony and thanked the council for considering the additional enforcement tool for DPS officers. He affirmed that the University would continue to collaborate with EPD as a partner in public safety. Mayor Piercy closed the hearing and called for comments from councilors. Councilor Clark complimented the University and EPD for their collaborative work to develop a strategy to increase public safety in an efficient way. He hoped that a similar collaborative effort could result in public safety options for the downtown area. In response to questions from Councilor Brown, EPD Capt. Rich Stronach said that DPS officers were employees of the University and were not armed. Their primary responsibility was with University property, but DPS officers also spent time in the near campus area because of the high concentration of student housing. He explained what constituted minor in possession and trespass violations and related enforcement activities. He said currently if DPS wanted to cite someone for trespass, EPD had to be contacted and dispatch an EPD officer to respond and write the citation; the ordinance modification would allow a DPS officer to issue the citation to the offender. Councilor Brown asked if the modification would have any impact on game days. Capt. Stronach said that it would allow DPS officers to write open container citations. Councilor Zelenka asked if the ordinance modification would cover all of the violations listed in EC 4.035. Capt. Stronach said the ordinance would grant DPS the authority to issue citations for certain violations; the city manager would determine which violations would be included in the intergovernmental agreement (IGA) granting that citation authority. He said there were some violations that would be inappropriate or inapplicable to the IGA. He stated that the police chief supported the ordinance. MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2009 Page 4 Public Hearing In response to comments from Councilor Poling, Capt. Stronach clarified that DPS officers had the authority to stop and search and make arrests on probable cause anywhere, not just on University property, but in practice did not engage in enforcement activities outside of the near campus area. Councilor Poling commended DPS for moving forward and assuming more responsibility for public safety on campus and in adjacent areas. Mr. Ruiz noted that while campus officers had the authority to take action on probable cause under State law, the ordinance would only apply if a violation occurred on University property. Councilor Taylor questioned how trespass could occur if the University campus was open to the public. Capt. Stronach explained that the University of Oregon was private property, but the premises were open to the public. He said DPS did not contact all campus visitors; officers concentrated on those who appeared to be engaged in inappropriate or criminal behavior. He said enforcement would be similar to the downtown exclusion ordinance, which required a violation before someone was excluded from the area. Mayor Piercy said the ordinance would be a tool for increasing public safety on and near campus and addressing the concerns of adjacent neighborhoods about the interface with students living in the area. She was pleased with the collaboration between the University and EPD and the support of neighbors for the proposed ordinance modification. She regarded it as a step toward community policing. Councilor Zelenka asked for a copy of the IGA and a list of violations that would be covered under the ordinance to be included in agenda materials when the item came before the council for action. Police Chief Pete Kerns said the violations the University of Oregon would be authorized to issue citations for had not yet been determined; those would be set forth in the IGA signed by the city manager and the University. The initial list would be limited to those where there was the greatest need, such as criminal trespass, and expanded if necessary in the future. He said the ordinance would authorize the City to expand that agreement with the University. Councilor Zelenka asked that the agenda packet contain the current IGA and included violations, in addition to the violations that would be in the expanded list. Mayor Piercy stated that the hearings and public records were closed for items 1 and 2, which were land use matters. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jon Ruiz City Manager (Recorded by Lynn Taylor) MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 19, 2009 Page 5 Public Hearing