HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 3716RESOLUTION NO, 3716
A. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BETHEL-- DANEBO
REFINEMENT PLAN UPDATE AND REPEALING RESO-
LUTION No. 2468,
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
11 In December of 1980 the Eugene Planning Commission ini-
tiated an update of the Bethel -Danebo Neighborhood Refinement Plan
(Phase I) originally adopted in 1975. The plan update was initi-
ated to reflect changes adopted in the Metropolitan Area General
Plan, including the location and refinement of three residential/
commercial development nodes and to address additional issues in
the Bethel- Danebo plan area,
2, The area of the plan update includes the neighborhoods
of the Active Bethel. Citizens and the Bethel Triangle Neighbors
and is defined by Greenhill Road along the west, Barger.Avenue and
the existing city limits line along the north and east, and the
boundary between the residential and industrial zoning along the
south to Terry Street, continuing west to Greenhill Road.
3, At the regular Active Bethel Citizens meeting of Janu-
ary 20, 19 81 ■ the Bethe 1-- Danebo plan area was reviewed to determine
representation on planning teams for the plan area. Because of
the areas size, it was divided into three planning areas. The
following month at a regular Active Bethel Citizens meeting on
February 17, 1981, residents and property owners formed planning
teams for each of the three areas.
4, The planning teams completed work on a draft of the
Bethel- Danebo Refinement Plan Update in April of 1982 and the
draft was mailed to all property owners, residents, and businesses
within the plan area
5, The plan update draft has been reviewed by the planning
teams and the two neighborhood groups within the refinement plan
area. The neighborhood planning team from the Bethel Triangle
area voted unanimously on April 6. 1982 to forward the plan up-
date draft to the Bethel Triangle Neighbors, On May 10, 1982,
that neighborhood association reviewed and recommended that the
plan update draft be ' forwarded to the Eugene Planning Commission.
The planning team members from the Active Bethel Citizens Associ-
ation area recommended the plan update draft to the Active Bethel
Citizens Association on April 8_, 1982, and on May 18, 1982 that
neighborhood organization recommended the plan draft be forwarded
to the Planning Commission.
6. The Eugene Planning Commission held a public hearing on
the draft Bethe 1- Danebo Refinement Plan Update on June 8. 198210
Resolution - 1
3716
Public testimony and issues were presented by residents and prop-
erty owners in the plan area. The Planning Commission identified
revisions to the plan draft in response to public testimony and
tools action at its meeting of June 14, 1982 to recommend a revised
version of the Bethel - Danebo Refinement Plan Update for adoption
by the City Council.
7, The Eugene City Council held a public hearing on the
Bethel - Danebo Refinement Plan Update on September 13 and considered
recommendations from the Planning Commission, representatives of
the Active Bethel Citizens and Bethel Triangle Neighbors, and mem-
bers of the public.,
8. The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed
the Bethel.- Danebo Refinement Plan Update, Based on the findings
herein and the public testimony, the City Council finds that the
Bethel - Danebo Refinement Plan Update is consistent with the Eugene-
Springfield Metropolitan Area General. Plan, the 1974 Co
Goals and. Policies, and the Statewide Planning Goals, and should
be adopted to replace and supercede the prior Bethel - Danebo Neigh-
borhood Refinement Plan (Phase I) adopted by Resolution No. 2468,
Now, therefore, based on the above findings,
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of THE CITY of EUGENE, a
Municipal Corporation of the State of Oregon, as follows:
Section 1 . The policies set forth in the Bethel- Danebo
Refinement Plan Update are hereby adopted as a refinement of the
Eugene - Spring f ield Metropolitan Area General Plan for the Be the 1-
Danebo Refinement Plan area, and the explanatory text following
the policies is recognized as clarifying and explaining the intent
of the policies.
Section 2 . The proposed land-use maps included in the Bethel-
Danebo Refinement Plan Update are hereby adopted as a refinement of
the Eugene - Springfield Metropolitan Area General. Plan diagram.
Section 3 . The proposals set forth in the Bethel -- Danebo Re-
finement Plan Update are hereby recognized as potential means of
reaching or implementing adopted policies, but are not adopted as
City policy.
Section 4 . The neighborhood goals set forth in the Bethel -
Danebo Refinement Plan Update are recognized as statements which
describe the hopes of people in the Bethel- Danebo area for the
future of their neighborhood, but are not adopted as City policy.
Section 5 . The revisions and errata of September 13, 1982, as
set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated by refer-
ence, are adopted as revisions to be incorporated in the Bethel-
Resolution - 2
437/16
Danebo Refinement Plan Update.
Section 6 . The revision of the proposed land -use map for the
plan area as illustrated in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorpor-
ated by reference is adopted as a revision to be incorporated in
the Bethel- Danebo Refinement Plan Update.,
Section 7. The City Council hereby adopts as additional find-
ings the supporting text, data, and maps contained in the Bethel -
Danebo Refinement Plan Update,
Section 8, As adopted herein, the Bethel - Danebo Refinement
Plan Update replaces and supercedes the prior Bethel - Danebo Neigh-
borhood. Refinement Plan, Phase I. and Resolution No. 2468 is hereby
repealed.
1982.
The foregoing Resolution adopted the 13th day of September,
City "Recorder
Resolution - 3.
3
EXHIBIT A
BETHEL- DANEBO REFINEMENT PLAN UPDATE
REVISIONS AND ERRATA
SEPTEMBER 139 1982
Deletions are shown in [brackets]. Additions are underlined Porti ons not
listed remain the same as the April 28, 1982, draft.
1. Add text to the second paragraph of the introduction (Page 1) to clarify the
description of the plan area:
" The Plan Area
The study area on the west is bounded by Greenhill Road, wh i ch is the westerly
limits of the urban growth boundary, then runs east along Barger Avenue to the
existing city limits line, along the city limits line to Beltl i ne Road, and
northwesterly to Highway 99 North. Then the boundary extends south along
Highway 99 North to Jessen Avenue, then south and easterly along the existin
city l i mi is line, wh i ch is adjacent to the Southern Pacific R ai l road yards to
the spur wh'i ch creates the Coos Bay branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad.
The boundary then extends westerly along the boundary between the residential
area south of Roosevelt Boulevard and the industrial area north of Cross Street
to Highway 99 North. From Highway 99 North to the west, the boundary is delin-
eated by the proposed Roosevelt Boulevard and storm channel separating existing
and proposed residential and industrial uses west to [Greenhill Road] Danebo
Avenue. West of Danebo Avenue, the southern boundary is defined b y the
between the existin residential zonin on the north and industrial zoning on
the south to the Amazon Slou h then continues due west to Greenhill Road."
2. Following the second paragraph of the introduction (Pagel), add anew
subsection entitled "Plan Contents" to di scu ss s plan format and the role of
Policies, Proposals, the Land Use Diagram, Neighborhood Goals, and Findings, as
follows:
"Plan Contents
The plan i s divided into three elements: I. Land Use, II. Urban Services and the
Urban Growth Boundary and III. Trans ortati on. Each element includes an intro-
duction, back round material , and recommendations in the form of policies and'
ro osal s . Polices are adopted by the City Council as ui des for decision- -
making related to the plan area. Ci t programs,, actions, and decisions such as
zone changes, traffic pattern changes and ca ital improvements wi 1 be evalu-
ated on the basis of their ability to im l ement these of i ci es as well as
other ado t ed C - ity goal s and of i c i es . Because the are ado ted b the council
as the Cat s ui e for action policies are the most im ortant statements in the
p lan, Proposals are suggestions for im l ementin of icies of this plan. In
g eneral , they wi 11 be further reviewed and studied and may or ma not be im l e-
mented in the form in which they appear in the l an . They are reco n i zed as
ideas which have been suggested after some public discussion as possible was to
implement the plan, but are not adopted as City po 1 icy. The plan also includes
Nei hborhood Goals an Fin in s. Neighborhood goa s are statements in icatin
Be
37/6
the hopes of people in t Bethel - Danebo area for the future of their neighbor
oo s. Fin in s are factual
actua statements resu tin from ata- atherin an
analysis and/or community perce t i on s,
maps are included in the 1 an and appear at the end of various elements or
subsections the rel ate to. The Proposed Land Use maps provide a generalized
ra hic is la of rojected land use and will be treated as a refinement of the
Metropolitan Area General Plan's P l a n Diagram.
This l an, when adopted, will provide a of is framework and vide for s ecific
decision-making, In that wa , the 21an provides a guideline for short -- and 1 on -
range decisions."
30 Revise text in the Introduction, page 1, paragraph 3 of the plan update draft
as f o l l o w s : "The potential for residential growth within the Bethel - Danebo area
[involves land inside the city limits just east of Terry Street and is] primarily
involves the area west of Terry Street but within the urban growth boundary."
4. Add map reference to paragraph 3, page 2 as f o l l o w s : "other land uses for
the development nodes have similarly been reviewed as to location and land use
pattern (see map on page 4) , "
5, Correct text on page 2, heading [Policies] Policy. [1.1
6. Revise Policy 1, page 2 as follows: "The following land use designations in
the Eugene -- Springfield Metropolitan Area General P l a n [should] shat 1 ' be main-
tained: . 6 O
7. The Proposed Land Use Map for the plan area on page 4 will be corrected to
reflect the Metropolitan Area General Plan designation and existing zoning and
land uses located west of Danebo Avenue along the southerly boundary of the plan
area. (See Exhibit B for corrected Proposed Land Use Map.)
8, Insert map reference last paragraph, page 5. "The Barger- -Beltl i ne develop-
ment node involves approximately 92 acres of land which includes , and 71
acres of medium-density residential (see map on page 9) , "
9. Revise Policy on page 7 ' as f o l l o w s : "A commercial/residential node,
[should] shall be developed . (see map on page 9),,"
10. Correct Proposal 2. page 7 as f o l l o w s : "In an effort to . , both
[Elizabeth] Cubit Street . 0 ."
11. Correct Proposal 3, page 8 as f o l l o w s : "It appears appropriate , to
the extensions of [Elizabeth] Cubit Street and . . , the only exception would be
9 . , of the [special study area development_ node
12. The order of proposals on pages 7 and 8 of the plan update draft will be
changed to group similar proposals. Proposals 1 , 3, and 10 w i l l become 1, 2,
and 3 and the rest of the proposals will be renumbered accordingly,
IVAI
3 7/6
o
13 . Propos 4, page 8 (which will be new proposal #5) should be revised to
read: "[The present efforts by] The Eugene Parks Department should continue its
efforts to acquire [ a five-acre] additional ark land for the park site north of
Barger Avenue between Be l t l i ne Road and Highway 99 North."
14. Proposal 7, page 8 (new proposal 8) will be corrected to read: "Effective
screening, berms, or landscaping should be provided along all arterials--
Bel tl i ne Road, Barger Avenue, and Highway 99 North--in an effort to minimize
exi sting and future negative impacts [existing and future] from these arterials.'"
..III .I _
15. Proposal 8, page 10 (new Proposal 9) will be corrected to read: "A profile
. of . . [must] should be considered."
16, Proposal 13, page 10 will be corrected to read: "Based on the . site
review procedures [are] should provide an adequate o il
17. Revise Policy, page 12 to read: "A residential node [should] shall be
developed . . ."" _
18. on page 12, revise proposal 1 to read: "[Require] Site review procedures
should be requi for the commercial portion . . . and planned unit development
proce ures required for the residential portion of the node,
19. on page 12, revise proposal 2 to read: "[Provide] Adequate and safe auto- -
m o b i l e ingress and egress from Royal Avenue and D anebo Avenue should_ be provided
taking into consideration the possibi lty of a future Royal- -Beltl ine bypass. �
20. on page 12, revise proposal 3 to read.: "[Provide] Safe and adequate
pedestrian -- and bicycle -- oriented access should be provided between the commer-
cial portion of the development node . . in the immediate
mme i ate and general area
north of Royal Avenue."
21. On page 12, revise proposal 4 to read: " [Provide] An adequate transition
from density in building height should be provided between low-density
residential development."
22. on page 12, revise proposal 5 to read* "[Do not allow in the development]
Through access should not be allowed in the devel which will circumvent
the intersection of Royal Avenue and Danebo Avenue."
23, on page 14, paragraph 1, revise the text to read: " [ It is the intent that]
A floating node [like other nodes will] is intended to reflect the energy and
transportation [ p o l i c y ] o f i c i es [intent of the Metropolitan Area General Plan
. and proposed res i dent i a rev e l opment . "
24, on page 15, correct paragraph 2 as follows: "In evaluating the floating
node [considered] two other locations were considered;"
25. On pages 15 to 17, revise the policy statement to read; "When develop-
ment patterns indicate the need for an additional commercial/residential node
it [should] shall be located . . . residential . 11
1911
37/6
On page 17, revise proposal 1 to read* "[Require] Site review procedures
should be requ i red for review . . portion of the node."
27. On page 17, revise proposal 2 to read: "[Provide] Adequate automobile
access should be re u i red [into] to serve the residential area . avoiding
Ein] a through automobile traffic movement within a residential area."
28. On page 17, revise proposal 3 to read: "[Provide] Safe and adequate pedes-
trian and bicycle access should be Y prov i ded either within the public right-of-
way or as an independent easement or route,"
29. on page 19, revise policy 1 to read: "Highest priority [should] shall be
given to preserving housing in the Bethel Triangle area. It [should] sha1T be
recognized [for what] that it is an irreplaceable resource . Support for its
continued viability [should] shall be provided along . . ."
30. On page 19, revise Policy 2 to read:
"Any changes in zone within the Bethel Triangle area [should] shall conform to
the following guidelines:
a. Industrial development [should not occur where it would take access
from the same local street which serves existing residential develop-
ment in areas where land use proposed in this plan includes retention
of existing residential development] within and on the periphery of
the Bethel Triangle [must] shall give due consideration to minimizing
[development] impact on- residential development."
31. on page 20, delete proposal 1b.
32. on page 20, revise proposal lc (now proposal lb) to read: "[c] b rezoning
of residentially zoned parcels . . . to the east E.],[To] to minimize impact on
. west side of Aberdeen Street."
33. on pages 22 and 23, revise existing and proposed land use maps for the
Bethel Triangle area to reflect commercial land uses between Highway 99 North
and the Burlington Northern Railroad
34, On page 27, revise policy 1 to read: "The Eugene Parks and Recreation
Department [should] shall continue . . . facilities."
35. On page 27, revise policy 2 to read: "Private developers [should] shall be
encouraged . . . for Parks."
36, on page 28, revise policy 3 to read: "Landscape buffer [should] shall be
provided . . . etc."
37. On page 27, revise policy 5 to read: "A community center or centers
[should] shall be . . . whole."
38, on page 27, revise policy 6 to read: "Acquisition and development . .
[should] shall receive . . . the city,"
4-
39. On. page 28, add a new Policy 7 as follows: "In reviewing the Parks Master
Plan the City shall consider:
a. identifying park devel o ment as a _ priority for the Bethel - Danebo area
in the first phase of the Master Plan; and -
b, retainin2 Bethel Park at its resent location south of the A -2 storm
channel,, between East Irwin wa and West Irwin Wa .'I
40. On page 27, change order of Parks Policies, Policies 5 and 6 from
page 28 will now be Policies 1 and 2 on page 27. New Policy 7 (Item 39) w i l l
be P o l i c y 3 on page 28. P o l i c i e s 1 and 2 from page 27 and P o l i c i e s 3 and 4 on
page 28 will be renumbered 4, 5, 6, and 7 respectively.
41. On page 32, revise policy 1 to read: "Decisions regarding new school . .
[should] shall continue . . students."
42. On page 32, revise policy 2 to read: "Where existing arterials . . . [the
need to find elementary students] alternative means of crossing these barriers
shall be considered i nc 1 ud i n overpasses or pedestrian-activated signals
should be investigated],"
43* on page 33, correct paragraph 2 to read: "Station #4 is . . . This station
provides backup . Elmira Road and [Bertelson] Berntzen Road,"
44, on page 33, correct paragraph 3 to read: "Station 8 is located near the
intersection of Elmira Road and EBertelsen] Berntzen Road,"
45. on page 33, correct the policy to read: "Additional . The [undevelopment]
undeveloped area west of . . . from stations number 4 and number 8,"
46, On page 34, correct policy 1 to read:, "The service and distribution .
by the City of Eugene and [or] the Eugene water and Electric Board . "
47. On page 38, policy 11: Mechanisms shall be em 1 o ed to encoura a [T] t hrough
truck traffic . . . Bert 1 eson Road and Elmira Road should to use the Roosevelt
Extension once it is completed.
48. Add a new proposal, proposal #8 on page 39 as follows: " The City sh al 1
work with 2roperty owners and residents of the Bethel Tri an 1 e Neighborhood on
the planned improvement of Roosevelt Boulevard and consider the fear i bi l i tv of
turn ockets at ma i ntersections as an alternative to a cont i nous center turn
1 ane. Cons eratlons shall c u
Inde the streets ability to safe hand e the
p rojected volumes and mix of automobile and bike traffic . 1 '
49, On page 43, the bikeways map will be corrected to show an on-- street bike
route on Bethel Drive.
50. Change references to "Goals" on pages 36, 39, and 41 to `lNe orhood
Goals."
WF :bm /PL115bl2
-5_
3 716
EXHIBIT B
BETHEL-DANEBO REFINEMENT PLAN UPDATE
a)
(no
�.
a)
-
0
...
M
a)
L
a)
am
'D
3
E)
a !
L
r
as
sm
L
am
L
m ,
V
a
13
r.
Sm
r.
E
13
a r.
m.
3
au
E
3
w -
M
E
c
L
c
am
13
a)
C
M
E
w
>
�'
Jc
0
am
I
U
0
E9
M
3:
saw M
J
cj
Hi
w
N
w
.......... .
... .... ...
... .........
ir
it
.. ....... ... ..
... ........
... ..... .
............
®�
Mal
. ..............
------ - ------
Bonn=
AeN=z I to N
-----------
. ... . ... . .... .
X.X:
X: X.
00to Iyaulls.U1301
.x
X ...... . ...
. ... ............ ....
x, El
........... . .... .. .......
...........
ID
. . . . .
: :ti ; :
. . . . . . . . .
........ .. . . . .......
x
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X
..... ......
........ .......
-x- ... ...... ........
.1 ......... ...... .
0 0 1 —
...... 813FYVC
..... .....
y
............. X le
4**;,4+..-.-.-.*�-,�,....4,�4�4.*..� .......... . . ......
.................... ......
X
...... .. .. . .. . ....... .
..............
......... . .....
. . .............
X
............. ...
..... ....... ..........
-x
... .. ... x.
........ ........ .
-------- -----
....... ..... ... . ..........
S.
■
. . ..... . .....
...
. . .......
-X
te
. ............... . . . .. .. ...
. .. .....
. .. .....
..... .. ...
.. ..... .
. . . ........ . ......
....... .. ......
X.
'x` . ....
. .. .. .. .... ... . . . . . .
......... .......
. . .......
.... . ....
.................................
.. . . .... ..... .......
..... . . ......... . ...
. ..... ...... . . .
............
....... . .
X., .....
. .................
. .. . ...................
. . .... ..... ..... .. ..
..........
. ...........
. .........
is ........... . . .. .
..........
................
.......... ......
.. . .. .
...... • x: .... .. _ ?r
..........
..... ..... .....
.........
.... ..... ....
................... . . ....
..... ............. ... . . ..... . . .... . .....
.%X
................... ... o"':
NX ... .. ..
"Ve". ......
-- ------- -- .....
.. .. ... . ...
...........
..... ............
.............. . . . .
...........
...........
............
... ...... X.
PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
SEPTEMBER 13, 1982
O
-laid
tf%fo
a wj