Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem A: ODOT/Beltline Highway - River Road to Coburg Road ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY Work Session: Beltline Highway - River Road to Coburg Road - Oregon Department of Transportation Facility Plan Update Meeting Date: April 14, 2010 Agenda Item Number: A Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Chris Henry www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-8472 ISSUE STATEMENT The Eugene City Council will receive a progress update from the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) about the Beltline Facility Plan: River Road to Coburg Road. ODOT staff will discuss the overall facility plan process and present maps illustrating the range of improvement concepts under consideration for Beltline Highway. They will also share results of a concept evaluation process and summary of recent public comment. The council will have an opportunity to ask questions about the improvement concepts, provide feedback, and hear about the next steps in the facility planning process. BACKGROUND The purpose of the Beltline Facility Plan is to develop recommendations for long-range improvements to Beltline Highway functionality between Coburg Road and River Road. Early facility plan work involved community interviews, technical data-gathering and an open house on August 4 and 6, 2008, to identify concerns and develop a project problem statement. The problem statement identifies issues and concerns regarding safety, operation, and capacity of the Beltline Highway in both objective and subjective ways. Additional public open houses were held on July 29, 2009, and March 16, 2010, to both inform and engage the community throughout the facility planning process. Citizens have expressed a range of concerns from protecting the environment to fixing operational problems that would improve safety and traffic flow on the Beltline Highway. Alternative concepts for the Beltline Highway have been developed and presented for public review, comment and refinement. Those concepts have been further evaluated by staff and continue to be considered by the project stakeholder and steering committees. The stakeholder and steering committees will likely make recommendations that narrow the range of alternatives for further consideration based on their evaluation and citizen feedback. The Beltline Facility Plan will recommend project improvement alternatives, within this narrowed range, for further environmental analysis. At a later date, the council will be asked to endorse the Beltline Facility Plan. The Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning Organization (through its Metropolitan Policy Committee) will also be asked to endorse the Beltline Facility Plan before final adoption by the Oregon Transportation Commission. Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100414\S100414A.doc A future environmental analysis, under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), will be conducted following adoption of the Beltline Facility Plan. The NEPA analysis will include more detailed and rigorous analysis of project impacts and recommend a preferred project alternative necessary for federal funding eligibility. Additional project information is available through the ODOT project website at www.beltlineplan.com. RELATED CITY POLICIES The Eugene City Council engaged in a discussion of Transportation Priorities for north and west Eugene on September 25, 2006. That discussion concluded on October 9, 2006, with the council action to set the Beltline Corridor from River Road to Coburg Road as the City’s top priority for funding in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). A study of Beltline Highway between Coburg Road and River Road is also included in the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Transportation System Plan (TransPlan). COUNCIL OPTIONS Receive information and provide feedback to ODOT and staff regarding Beltline Facility Plan development. CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION None. Information only. SUGGESTED MOTION None. ATTACHMENTS A. ODOT Slide Presentation B. ODOT Concept Evaluation Memorandum C. ODOT Open House Summary (March 16, 2010) FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Chris Henry, Transportation Planning Engineer Telephone: (541) 682-8472 Staff E-Mail: chris.c.henry@ci.eugene.or.us Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100414\S100414A.doc Overview •Existing/Future Conditions Analysis •Problem Identification Beltline Facility Plan: Beltline Facility Plan: •Identify Alternatives/Potential Solutions River Road to CoburgRoad River Road to CoburgRoad •Public Involvement –Stakeholder Interviews –Community Forums –Community Meetings –Project Committees Project Management Team Savannah Crawford, ODOT Region Planner Eugene City Council Work Session Stakeholder Advisory Committee April 14, 2010 Steering Committee 12:00p Evaluation processEvaluation Criteria Evaluation processEvaluation Criteria •Mobility, Reliability & Connectivity Range of concepts Ü»½»³¾»® •Safety •Community Livability & Economic Vitality `±k?㪠ֿ²«¿®§ñ Ú»¾®«¿®§ •Environmental Impacts •Cost Effectiveness Û??£_?ªÐ Ó¿®½¸ñ ß°®·´ñÓ¿§ £ø£ª?? Next Steps •Narrow Range of Concepts for Further Study (April-June) •Develop Short Term Solutions (May- July) •Facility Plan Wrap-Up (Fall ’10) •NEPA (TBD) TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ûØÑÉÑÔÏØ÷ÜÚÔÑÔÉÄíÑÜÏíÕÜÊØôôëÔÇØËëÎÜÙÉÎúÎÛÈËÖ ëÎÜÙúÎÏÚØÍÉøÇÜÑÈÜÉÔÎÏíËÎÚØÊÊÜÏÙëØÊÈÑÉÊ Þ»´¬´·²» Ú¿½·´·¬§ д¿² ÐÓÌ PREPARED FOR: Ì»®®¿ Ô·²¹´»§ñÝØîÓ Ø×ÔÔ PREPARED BY: Õ®·­¬·² Ø«´´ñÝØîÓ Ø×ÔÔ COPIES: ͸¿«² Ï«¿§´»ñÕß× Ú»¾®«¿®§ îíô îðïð DATE: ̸·­ ³»³±®¿²¼«³ ¼»­½®·¾»­ ¬¸» ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ «­»¼ ¬± ¼»ª»´±° ¿²¼ »ª¿´«¿¬» ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¼±½«³»²¬»¼ ·­­«»­ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ ݱ¾«®¹ α¿¼ò ̸» º·®­¬ °¸¿­» ±º ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ú¿½·´·¬§ д¿² ©¿­ ¬± ¹¿¬¸»® ¾¿½µ¹®±«²¼ ·²º±®³¿¬·±²ô ½±²¼«½¬ »¨·­¬·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿²¼ ­¿º»¬§ ½±²¼·¬·±²­ ¿²¿´§­»­ô ¿²¼ ¼»º·²» °®±¾´»³­ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¬»½¸²·½¿´ ®»­»¿®½¸ ¿²¼ ½±³³«²·¬§ ·²°«¬ò ̸·­ °®±½»­­ ½±²½´«¼»¼ ·² ѽ¬±¾»® îððè ¿²¼ ®»­«´¬»¼ ·² ¿² ¿°°®±ª»¼ °®±¾´»³ ­¬¿¬»³»²¬ ¾§ ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¿¼ª·­±®§ ¾±¼·»­ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ·² ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ °¸¿­» øи¿­» î÷ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ·­­«»­ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ·² и¿­» ïò ̸·­ ³»³± ·­ ±®¹¿²·¦»¼ ·²¬± ¬¸®»» ­»½¬·±²­æ ¿ ¼»­½®·°¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ °®±½»­­ ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬¸» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ±º ¬¸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² º®¿³»©±®µ ¿²¼ ½±²½»°¬­ô »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ³»¬¸±¼­ «­»¼ ¬± »ª¿´«¿¬» ¬¸» °®±°±­»¼ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ò Concept Development Process и¿­» î ±º ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ú¿½·´·¬§ д¿² ¾»¹¿² ·² ß°®·´ ±º îððçò ׬­ °«®°±­» ·­ ¬± ¹»²»®¿¬» ¿²¼ »ª¿´«¿¬» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ­±´«¬·±²­ô ¿²¼ ¬± ·¼»²¬·º§ ­»ª»®¿´ ª·¿¾´» ·¼»¿­ º±® ¼»¬¿·´»¼ ­¬«¼§ò ݱ²½»°¬­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¿²¼ ©·´´ ¾» »ª¿´«¿¬»¼ ©·¬¸ ¸»´° º®±³ ¬¸» °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ ´±½¿´ ­¬¿µ»¸±´¼»®­ô ÑÜÑÌô Ý·¬§ ±º Û«¹»²»ô Ô¿²» ݱ«²½·´ ±º Ù±ª»®²³»²¬­ô ÔÌÜô ¿²¼ Ô¿²» ݱ«²¬§ò Evaluation Framework Þ»º±®» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ½±²½»°¬­ ±® ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ô ¿² »ª¿´«¿¬·±² º®¿³»©±®µ ©¿­ ½®»¿¬»¼ ¬± ·¼»²¬·º§ ¿ °®±½»­­ ¿²¼ ­»¬ ±º ½®·¬»®·¿ ¬± »ª¿´«¿¬» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» °«®°±­» ­¬¿¬»³»²¬ ³»²¬·±²»¼ ¿¾±ª»ò ̸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² º®¿³»©±®µ ·­ ¾¿­»¼ ±² °®±¶»½¬ ¹±¿´­ ¿²¼ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ô ¿²¼ ©¿­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¾»º±®» ¾®¿·²­¬±®³·²¹ °±¬»²¬·¿´ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± »²½±«®¿¹» ¿² ±°»² ¿²¼ «²¾·¿­»¼ »ª¿´«¿¬·±² °®±½»­­ò ̸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² º®¿³»©±®µ ©¿­ ½®»¿¬»¼ ©·¬¸ ·²°«¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ÍËÎÓØÚÉiÊíËÎÓØÚÉðÜÏÜÖØÐØÏÉéØÜÐíðé ͬ¿µ»¸±´¼»® ß¼ª·­±®§ ݱ³³·¬¬»» øÍßÝ÷ô ¿²¼ Ю±¶»½¬ ͬ»»®·²¹ ݱ³³·¬¬»» øÐÍÝ÷ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 1 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS ülÚÎÏÊÈÐØËËØÍÎËÉÊkËÜÉÔÏÖÊÚÜÑØÆÜÊÈÊØÙ¬± ½±³°¿®» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ò ̸» ­½¿´» ·­ ·²½´«¼»¼ ¾»´±©  ëÜÉÔÏÖ ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ¿¼¼®»­­»­ ¬¸» ½®·¬»®·±² ¿²¼ñ±® ³¿µ»­ ­«¾­¬¿²¬·¿´ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ·² ¬¸» ½®·¬»®·¿ ½¿¬»¹±®§ ̸» ½±²½»°¬ °¿®¬·¿´´§ ¿¼¼®»­­»­ ¬¸» ½®·¬»®·±² ¿²¼ñ±® ³¿µ»­ ­±³» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ·² ¬¸» ½®·¬»®·¿ ½¿¬»¹±®§ ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ²»·¬¸»® ³»»¬­ ²±® ¼±»­ ²±¬ ³»»¬ ·²¬»²¬ ±º ½®·¬»®·±²ò ß´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ¸¿­ ²± »ºº»½¬ô ±® ½®·¬»®·±² ¼±»­ ²±¬ ¿°°´§ ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ¼±»­ ²±¬ ­«°°±®¬ ¬¸» ·²¬»²¬ ±º ¿²¼ñ±® ²»¹¿¬·ª»´§ ·³°¿½¬­ ¬¸» ½®·¬»®·¿ ½¿¬»¹±®§ Ë­·²¹ ¬¸» ¿¾±ª» ®¿¬·²¹ ³»¬¸±¼ô ¿ ­»¬ ±º »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ½®·¬»®·¿ ©¿­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ô ½±²­·­¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¹±¿´­ ¿²¼ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ ¿­ ±«¬´·²»¼ ·² и¿­» ï ±º ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ò ̸»­» ½®·¬»®·¿ ¿®» ·²¬»²¼»¼ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ·³°±®¬¿²¬ »´»³»²¬­ ±º ¬¸·­ °®±¶»½¬ò ̸»§ ¿®» ´·­¬»¼ ¾»´±© ·² ²± °¿®¬·½«´¿® ±®¼»®å ¿ ©»·¹¸¬ ·­ ²±¬ ·²¬»²¼»¼ ¬± ¾» ¿°°´·»¼ ¬± ¬¸»­» ª¿®·±«­ ½¿¬»¹±®·»­ò ïò ðÎÛÔÑÔÉÄËØÑÔÜÛÔÑÔÉÄÜÏÙÚÎÏÏØÚÉÔÇÔÉÄ îò êÜ×ØÉÄ íò úÎÐÐÈÏÔÉÄÑÔÇÜÛÔÑÔÉÄÜÏÙØÚÎÏÎÐÔÚÇÔÉÜÑÔÉÄ ìò øÏÇÔËÎÏÐØÏÉÜÑÔÐÍÜÚÉÊ ëò úÎÊÉØ××ØÚÉÔÇØÏØÊÊ Creating Alternative Concepts ß´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¾»¬©»»² Ö«´§ îððç ¿²¼ Ü»½»³¾»® îððç ©·¬¸ ·²°«¬ º®±³ ¬¸» °«¾´·½ô ¬¸» ÐÓÌô ÐÍÝ ¿²¼ ÍßÝò Ю±¶»½¬ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿ ¬¸®»» ­¬»° °®±½»­­æ ïòléØÅÉÛÎÎÒkêÎÑÈÉÔÎÏÊ÷ÔËÊÉÉÕØÍËÎÓØÚÉÉØ¿³ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ¬¸» ¬»¨¬¾±±µ ­±´«¬·±²­ ¬± ¬¸» µ·²¼­ ±º °®±¾´»³­ ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò îò÷ÜÐÔÑÔØÊÎ×úÎÏÚØÍÉÊnïØÅÉÉÕØÊØÖØÏØËÜ´ ­±´«¬·±²­ ©»®» ¿°°´·»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ½±®®·¼±® ¬± »¨¿³·²» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ·³°¿½¬­ »¿½¸ ©±«´¼ ¸¿ª» ¿²¼ ¬± «²¼»®­¬¿²¼ ¬¸» ¿½½»°¬¿¾·´·¬§ ±º »¿½¸ ¿°°®±¿½¸ò íòß´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ݱ²½»°¬­ ó Ú·²¿´´§ô ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ½±³¾·²»¼ ¿¬¬®·¾«¬»­ ±º ¬¸» º¿³·´·»­ ±º ½±²½»°¬­ ©¸·´» ³·²·³·¦·²¹ «²¿½½»°¬¿¾´» ·³°¿½¬­ò ̸·­ °®±½»­­ ·­ ­¸±©² ·² º·¹«®» ï ¿²¼ ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ·² ¼»¬¿·´ ¾»´±©ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 2 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Figure 1 Alternative Development Process Textbook Solutions Ѳ½» ¬¸» Ûª¿´«¿¬·±² Ú®¿³»©±®µ ©¿­ ¿¹®»»¼ «°±²ô ¬¸» ¬»½¸²·½¿´ ­¬¿ºº ½®»¿¬»¼ ¸·¹¸ ´»ª»´ô lÉØÅÉÛÎÎÒkÊÎÑÈÉÔÎÏÊÉÕÜÉÆÎÈÑÙÛØÉÄÍÔÚÜ´´§ «­»¼ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ·­­«»­ º±«²¼ ±² º¿½·´·¬·»­ ´·µ» ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ô ¿²¼ ¾®·²¹ ·¬ ½´±­»® ¬± ½«®®»²¬ »²¹·²»»®·²¹ ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ ¿²¼ ¾»­¬ °®¿½¬·½»­ò ̸» ¬»¨¬¾±±µ ­±´«¬·±²­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ ©»®»æ ͧ­¬»³ ݱ²­·¼»®¿¬·±²­ô Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ Ý¿°¿½·¬§ô ¿²¼ ײ¬»®½¸¿²¹» Ý¿°¿½·¬§ò ½±²­·¼»® ¸±© ¬¸» ­¬®»»¬ ²»¬©±®µ ½¿² ¾» ·³°®±ª»¼ êÄÊÉØÐÚÎÏÊÔÙØËÜÉÔÎÏÊÉØÅÉÛÎÎÒÊÎÑÈÉÔÎÏÊ ¬± ®»¼«½» ½±²¹»­¬·±² ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸» ­§­¬»³ ½±²­·¼»®¿¬·±²­ º±® ¬¸» º¿³·´§ ±º ½±²½»°¬­ ·²½´«¼»¼ ©»®»æ Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ͧ­¬»³ ¿²¼ Ü»³¿²¼ Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬ øÌÍÓ ¿²¼ ÌÜÓ÷ô ²»¬©±®µ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ô ¿²¼ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ®·ª»® ½®±­­·²¹­ò ·²½´«¼» ¿¼¼·²¹ ´¿²»­ ¬± ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ò ûØÑÉÑÔÏØõÔÖÕÆÜÄÚÜÍÜÚÔÉÄÉØÅÉÛÎÎÒÊÎÑÈÉÔÎÏÊ ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ´¿²»­ ½±«´¼ ·²½´«¼» ·²½®»¿­·²¹ ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ ¬± ¿ ¬±¬¿´ ±º ¬¸®»» ¾¿­·½ ´¿²»­ ·² »¿½¸ ¼·®»½¬·±²ô ¿¼¼·²¹ ¿«¨·´·¿®§ ´¿²»­ º±® ³»®¹·²¹ ¿²¼ ©»¿ª·²¹ô ±® ¿¼¼·²¹ ¿ ½±´´»½¬±®ó ¼·­¬®·¾«¬±® ®±¿¼©¿§ ¬± ®»³±ª» ³»®¹·²¹ ¿²¼ ©»¿ª·²¹ º®±³ ¬¸» º¿½·´·¬§ ¿²¼ °´¿½·²¹ ·¬ ±² ¿ ­»°¿®¿¬» ®±¿¼©¿§ò ­¬®·ª» ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ­¿º»¬§ ½±²½»®²­ ôÏÉØËÚÕÜÏÖØÚÜÍÜÚÔÉÄÉØÅÉÛÎÎÒÊÎÑÈÉÔÎÏÊ º±«²¼ ±² ¬¸» ±²ó ¿²¼ ±ººó®¿³°­ º±® ¬¸» ½´±­»´§ ­°¿½»¼ ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ò ̸·­ ·²½´«¼»­ «°¹®¿¼·²¹ ¬¸» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ ¿¬ ¿´´ ´±½¿¬·±²­ ¬± ¾®·²¹ ¬¸»³ ¬± ½«®®»²¬ »²¹·²»»®·²¹ CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 3 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS ­¬¿²¼¿®¼­ô ®»³±ª·²¹ ­»´»½¬»¼ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ ±® ®¿³°­ ¬± °®±ª·¼» ³±®» ­°¿½» ¾»¬©»»² ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ô ¿²¼ ¿¼¼ ¿ °¿®¬·¿´ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ¬± ¼®¿© ¬®¿ºº·½ ¿©¿§ º®±³ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ½±²¹»­¬»¼ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ò Families of Concepts ̸» ¬»¨¬¾±±µ ­±´«¬·±²­ ©»®» ¼·­½«­­»¼ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ÐÓÌô ÍßÝô ¿²¼ ÐÍÝ ¿²¼ º«®¬¸»® ®»º·²»¼ ·²¬± º¿³·´·»­ ±º ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ­°»½·º·½¿´´§ ¿°°´·»¼ ¬± ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸»­» º¿³·´·»­ ·²½´«¼» ¿ ο³° Þ®¿·¼ ±°¬·±²ô ©¸·½¸ ©±«´¼ °¸§­·½¿´´§ ­»°¿®¿¬» ¬¸» ±² ¿²¼ ±ºº ®¿³°­ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ô ¿ ݱ´´»½¬±®óÜ·­¬®·¾«¬±® øÝóÜ÷ ®±¿¼ ±°¬·±² ©¸·½¸ ©±«´¼ ®»³±ª» ¬¸» ³»®¹»ñ¼·ª»®¹» º®·½¬·±² ¬± ¿ ­»°¿®¿¬» °¿®¿´´»´ ®±¿¼©¿§ô ¿²¼ ¿ λ³±ª» ο³°­ ±°¬·±² ©¸·½¸ ©±«´¼ ½´±­» ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«»ñÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» ±² ¿²¼ ±ºº ®¿³°­ò ̸» ÍßÝ ³»³¾»®­ ¿²¼ 窻® α¿¼ Þ«­·²»­­»­ ¿¹®»»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¼·­½«­­·±² ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ®»³±ª» ®¿³°­ ½±²½»°¬ ©±«´¼ ²±¬ ¾» ½¿®®·»¼ º±®©¿®¼ô ¿­ ¿½½»­­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ³¿·²¬¿·²»¼ º±® ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«» ¾«­·²»­­»­ ¿²¼ ¬»½¸²·½¿´ ¿²¿´§­·­ ®»ª»¿´»¼ º¿¬¿´ º´¿©­ ·² ¬®¿ºº·½ ±°»®¿¬·±²­ ±² 窻® α¿¼ ¼«» ¬± ¼·ª»®¬»¼ ¬®¿ºº·½ ·º ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«»ñÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» ±² ¿²¼ ±ºº ®¿³°­ ©»®» ½´±­»¼ò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô ¬¸» ®¿³° ¾®¿·¼ ½±ÏÚØÍÉÆÜÊÚÎÏÊÔÙØËØÙÛÄÉÕØêüúÉÎÛØlÎÇØËÛÈÔÑÙÔÏÖkÜ ­±´«¬·±² ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¼«» ¬± ¬¸» ´¿®¹» º±±¬°®·²¬ ®»¯«·®»¼ ¿²¼ °±¬»²¬·¿´ ¾«­·²»­­ ¿²¼ ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ·³°¿½¬­ò ̸» ο³° Þ®¿·¼ º¿³·´§ ©¿­ ¿´¬»®»¼ ¬± ®»¼«½» ·³°¿½¬­ô ¿²¼ ©¿­ °®»­»²¬»¼ ¿¹¿·² ¿­ ´±©»®ó·³°¿½¬ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬ò ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¬± ¬¸»­» Ø·¹¸©¿§ º¿³·´§ ½±²½»°¬­ô ¬©± ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ½±²½»°¬­ ©»®» ¼»ª»´±°»¼ º±® ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ñÞ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¿ ­§­¬»³ ­»®ª·½» øº´§±ª»®÷ ½±²½»°¬ ­·³·´¿® ¬± ¬¸» ×óëñÞ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ º´§±ª»®ô ¿²¼ ¿ °¿®¬·¿´ ½´±ª»®´»¿ºô ©¸·½¸ ©±«´¼ ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ´±±° ®¿³°­ ±² ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ º®±³ ¬¸®»» ¬± ¬©±ò ̸» ÍßÝ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ÐÓÌ ¼»½·¼»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ­§­¬»³ó­»®ª·½» ½±²½»°¬ º±® ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ñÞ»´¬´·²» ײ¬»®½¸¿²¹» ©±«´¼ ¸¿ª» ³¿¶±® »²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ·³°¿½¬­ ¿²¼ ½®»¿¬» ¿ ´¿®¹» ­¬®«½¬«®» ¬¸¿¬ ³·¹¸¬ ¬± ±«¬ ±º ½±²¬»¨¬ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ­«®®±«²¼·²¹ ½±³³«²·¬§ô ¿²¼ ¿¹®»»¼ ¬± ­»¬ ¬¸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ¿­·¼»ò Alternative Concepts ̸» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ¿®» ¬¸» ½«´³·²¿¬·±² ±º ·²°«¬ º®±³ ¬¸» ª¿®·±«­ ¿¼ª·­±®§ ¹®±«°­ º±® ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ô ¿²¼ ¿¬¬»³°¬ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¾±¬¸ ¬»½¸²·½¿´ ½±²½»®²­ ¿²¼ ½±³³«²·¬§ ²»»¼­ò ̸» Ю±¶»½¬ Ì»¿³ ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ³±­¬ ±º ¬¸» º¿³·´§ ½±²½»°¬­ ®»¯«·®» ¿ ´¿®¹»® º±±¬°®·²¬ ¿²¼ ÊÉËÈÚÉÈËØÊÜÏÙÙØÇØÑÎÍØÙÜËÜÏÖØÎ×lÑÎÆÛÈÔÑÙkÜÑÉØËÏÜÉÔÇØÚÎÏÚØÍÉÊÉÎØÇÜÑÈÜÉØ ¿´±²¹­·¼» ¬¸» ¸·¹¸»® ¾«·´¼ ¼«» ¬± ¬¸» ®»¿´·¬§ ¬¸¿¬ ½«®®»²¬ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² º«²¼·²¹ ·­ ­½¿®½» ¿²¼ °®±¶»½¬»¼ ¬± ¼»½®»¿­» ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ²»¨¬ î𠧻¿®­ò ̸®»» ´±© ¾«·´¼ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ô ¿´±²ÖÆÔÉÕÉÆÎlÐØÙÔÈÐÛÈÔÑÙkÚÎÏÚØÍÉÊÆØËØ ¿¼¼»¼ ¬± ¬¸» ®¿²¹» ¬± ¾» »ª¿´«¿¬»¼ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ²»»¼ º±® ¿ ´»­­ ½±­¬´§ ®¿²¹» ±º ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ò ̸» ÐÓÌô ÍßÝô ¿²¼ ÐÍÝ ¿°°®±ª»¼ ¬¸» º«´´ ®¿²¹» ±º ½±²½»°¬­ °®·±® ¬± ¾»¹·²²·²¹ ¬¸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² °®±½»­­ò Û´»ª»² ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ©»®» »ª¿´«¿¬»¼ ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¬¸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² º®¿³»©±®µæ ұ󾫷´¼ CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 4 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS ÌÜÓñÌÍÓ ³»¿­«®»­ ±²´§ Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ݱ²½»°¬ ï Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ݱ²½»°¬ î Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ݱ²½»°¬ í ׳°®±ª» Û¨·­¬·²¹ Ô±½¿´ ß®¬»®·¿´ ß«¨·´·¿®§ Ô¿²» Í°´·¬ Ü·¿³±²¼ ݱ´´»½¬±®óÜ·­¬®·¾«¬±® ο³° Þ®¿·¼ Ü»¬¿·´»¼ ¼»­½®·°¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ¾»·²¹ ½±²­·¼»®»¼ ½¿² ¾» º±«²¼ ·² ß°°»²¼·¨ ßò Evaluation Methods ̸» ¹±¿´­ ©»®» ¬¸»² «­»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¬»¿³ ¬± »ª¿´«¿¬» ¬¸» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ½±²½»°¬­ ¿²¼ ·¼»²¬·º§ ¬¸» ®»´¿¬·ª» ·³°¿½¬­ ¿²¼ ¾»²»º·¬­ ±º »¿½¸ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»ò Û¿½¸ ¹±¿´ ¸¿­ ¾±¬¸ ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ ¿²¼ ³»¿­«®»­ò ß ®¿¬·²¹ ­½¿´» ©¿­ ¼»ª»´±°»¼ º±® »¿½¸ ³»¿­«®» ¿²¼ ¬¸» ®¿¬·²¹­ º±® »¿½¸ ³»¿­«®» ©·´´ ¾» ­«³³¿®·¦»¼ ¬± ¿ ¬±¬¿´ ®¿¬·²¹ º±® »¿½¸ ±¾¶»½¬·ª» ¿²¼ °®»­»²¬»¼ ¬± ¬¸» °«¾´·½ò ̸» ¹±¿´­ô ±¾¶»½¬·ª»­ô ³»¿­«®»­ô ¿²¼ ®¿¬·²¹­ ¿®» ·¼»²¬·º·»¼ ¾»´±©æ Mobility, reliability and connectivity ׳°®±ª» º«¬«®» ³±¾·´·¬§ô ®»´·¿¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ ½±²²»½¬·ª·¬§ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ô °¿®¬·½«´¿®´§ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò Objectives: Ü»­·¹² º±® °®±¶»½¬»¼ º«¬«®» ¬®¿ºº·½ ª±´«³»­ ¿­ ¿ ®»­«´¬ ±º º«¬«®» ¹®±©¬¸ ¿²¼ ´¿²¼ «­» ½¸¿²¹»­ Ó·²·³·¦» ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ±°¬·³·¦» ¬®¿ºº·½ º´±© ±² ¬¸» ³¿·²´·²»ô ·² ¬¸» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ¿®»¿­ô ¿²¼ ±² ½®·¬·½¿´ ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ®±¿¼©¿§­ Ю±ª·¼» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ®»¼«½» ¬®·° ´»²¹¬¸ ¿²¼ °±¬»²¬·¿´ ¬®¿ª»´ ¬·³»­ º±® ¬®¿ª»´ ³±¼»­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ·²½´«¼·²¹ ³±¬±® ª»¸·½´»­ô º®»·¹¸¬ô ¬®¿²­·¬ô ¾·½§½´»­ ¿²¼ ©¿´µ·²¹ Ю±ª·¼» ·³°®±ª»¼ ½±²²»½¬·ª·¬§ ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» É·´´¿³»¬¬» 窻® º±® ³±¬±®·­¬­ô ¾·½§½´·­¬­ ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ Measures: ùØÐÜÏÙÉÎÚÜÍÜÚÔÉÄùúnÍÑÜÏÏÔÏÖÑØÇØÑ ¿²¿´§­·­ ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ¬¸» ¿¾·´·¬§ ±º ¬¸» ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ­§­¬»³ ¬± ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ¬¸» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ª»¸·½«´¿® ¼»³¿²¼ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ³¿·²´·²»ô ¿²¼ ±² ±¬¸»® ½®·¬·½¿´ ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ®±¿¼©¿§­ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 5 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Ì®¿ºº·½ ±°»®¿¬·±²­ º±® ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ®¿³°­ ¿²¼ ®¿³° ¬»®³·²¿´ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ô ¿­ »ª¿´«¿¬»¼ ¾¿­»¼ ±² ®¿³° ­°¿½·²¹ ¿²¼ñ±® »´·³·²¿¬·²¹ ±® ·³°®±ª·²¹ ³»®¹»ô ¼·ª»®¹»ô ¿²¼ ©»¿ª·²¹ ³¿²»«ª»®­ ®»´¿¬·ª» ¬± ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ Ì®·° ´»²¹¬¸ ¿²¼ ¬®¿ª»´ ¬·³» ¾»¬©»»² µ»§ ±®·¹·²­ ¿²¼ ¼»­¬·²¿¬·±²­ º±® ¿´´ ³±¼»­ ·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ׳°®±ª» ´±½¿´ ½±²²»½¬·ª·¬§ º±® ¿´´ ³±¼»­ Measure Rating Demand to capacity (D/C) D/C under 1.0 on the Beltline Highway D/C between 1.0-1.4 (better than no build) mainline (Evaluated at the Willamette River bridge) No change in D/C from no build (~1.4) D/C above 1.4 (Worse than no build) Merge/diverge operations Merge/diverge is removed from the mainline on the ramps/interchanges Ramps/interchange operations generally are improved (increased spacing and/or improved geometry), but still merging/diverging on the mainline No change from no build Ramps/interchanges are worse than the no build Trip Length and Travel Time Reduced travel times and/or trip lengths for all types of trips using the Beltline Highway Some improvements to trip time and travel length for specific O/D pairs, such as local trips between Green Acres and Santa Clara No measurable change to system wide trip time and travel length N/A Connectivity for all modes New multimodal facilities New Highway connectivity – with ability to add an adjacent pedestrian and bicycle facility if the Willamette River Bridges are updated No new local connectivity Worse connectivity than no build CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 6 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Safety Ю±ª·¼» ¿ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ²»¬©±®µ ¬¸¿¬ ¸¿­ ¬¸» °±¬»²¬·¿´ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ­¿º»¬§ º±® ¿´´ ³±¼»­ò Objectives: ׳°®±ª» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ¿®»¿­ ·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ­¿º»¬§ º±® «­»®­ ¿²¼ ®»¼«½» ½®¿­¸ º®»¯«»²½§ ¿²¼ ­»ª»®·¬§ô ¬¸»®»¾§ ·³°®±ª·²¹ ®»´·¿¾·´·¬§ ݱ²­·¼»® ¬¸» ²»»¼­ ±º »³»®¹»²½§ ®»­°±²­» ª»¸·½´»­ Measures: д¿½»­ ·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ ©¸»®» ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ±® ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ ª·±´¿¬» µ²±©² »²¹·²»»®·²¹ ¾»­¬ °®¿½¬·½»­ ±® ¼»­·¹² ¹«·¼»´·²»­ ¿­ ®»´¿¬»¼ ¬± ­¿º»¬§ λ¼«½» ½±²º´·½¬ °±·²¬­ º±® ³±¬±®·­¬­ ¿²¼ ¾»¬©»»² ³±¬±®·­¬­ ¿²¼ ¾·½§½´·­¬­ ±® °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ Ю±ª·¼» ­§­¬»³ ®»¼«²¼¿²½§ ¿²¼ñ±® »²¸¿²½»¼ ³±¾·´·¬§ º±® »³»®¹»²½§ ®»­°±²­» ®±«¬»­ ¿²¼ ª»¸·½´»­ Measure Rating Places in the study area Improvement to geometric deficiencies in multiple areas and where the Beltline Highway movements or interchanges violate Some improvement to geometric deficiencies known engineering best practices or design Does not address geometric deficiencies guidelines Worsens geometric deficiencies Conflict points for bicyclists Not applicable at this level of design. Further design may limit or and pedestrians with decrease conflict points for bicyclists and pedestrians with motorists motorists. Conflict points between Separates weaving, merging and diverging movements motorists on Beltline Removes weaving conflicts between Delta Highway loop Highway ramp(s) No change Increase conflict points System redundancy and/or New river crossing for use in event of bridge closure or enhanced mobility for updated Willamette River Bridges with auxiliary lanes or C/D emergency response routes roads and vehicles No new river crossing capacity, but Beltline mainline capacity is added, enhancing emergency vehicle mobility No new river crossing capacity N/A CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 7 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Community livability and economic vitality Í«°°±®¬ô ­«­¬¿·²ô ¿²¼ »²¸¿²½» ½±³³«²·¬§ ´·ª¿¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ °®±¬»½¬ ¬¸» ¯«¿´·¬§ ¿²¼ ·²¬»¹®·¬§ ±º ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¿²¼ ¾«­·²»­­ ¿®»¿­ ²»¿® ¬¸» ½±®®·¼±®ò Í«°°±®¬ ±® ³¿·²¬¿·² ¬¸» ª·¬¿´·¬§ ±º ¿®»¿ ¾«­·²»­­»­ ¿²¼ ½±³³«²·¬·»­ò Objectives: Í«°°±®¬ ´±½¿´ ¿²¼ ®»¹·±²¿´ ¹±¿´­ º±® ³±¼» ½¸±·½»­ ø»ò¹ò ¾·½§½´»ô ¬®¿²­·¬ô °»¼»­¬®·¿² ±® °®·ª¿¬» ª»¸·½´»÷ ݱ²­·¼»® °±­·¬·ª» ¿²¼ ²»¹¿¬·ª» »ºº»½¬­ ±² ¿¼¶¿½»²¬ ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ¿²¼ ¾«­·²»­­ ¿®»¿­ Í»®ª» »¨·­¬·²¹ ¿²¼ °´¿²²»¼ ´¿²¼ «­»­ ß½½±³³±¼¿¬» º®»·¹¸¬ ³±ª»³»²¬ Ý®»¿¬» ¿ º¿½·´·¬§ ¼»­·¹² ¬¸¿¬ ·²­¬·´´­ ½±³³«²·¬§ °®·¼» Measures: Ó·²·³·¦» ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ ·³°¿½¬­ ݱ²­·­¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ½±³³«²·¬§ ¿²¼ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ ¹±¿´­ øÓ»¬®± д¿²ô Ì®¿²­Ð´¿²ô Ü»´¬¿ б²¼­ Ê·­·±²ô 窻®­ ¬± η¼¹»­ Ê·­·±²ô 窻® α¿¼óÍ¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ Ú¿½·´·¬·»­ д¿²ô Ô¿²» ݱ«²¬§ ÌÍÐô ÎÌÐô Ý·¬§ ±º Û«¹»²» Ù®±©¬¸ Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬ д¿²ô ɸ·¬»¿µ»® Í°»½·º·½ д¿²ô ¿²¼ É·´´¿µ»²¦·» ß®»¿ д¿²÷ Ò»© ±® ·³°®±ª»¼ ³«´¬·³±¼¿´ º¿½·´·¬·»­ Ó·²·³·¦» ¾«­·²»­­ ¼·­°´¿½»³»²¬­ ß½½»­­ ¬± ¬¸» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ¿®»¿ ¾«­·²»­­»­ ¬¸¿¬ ·­ ¾±¬¸ ­¿º» ¿²¼ ½±²ª»²·»²¬ ݱ²­·­¬»²¬ ©·¬¸ ­¬¿¬» °´¿²²·²¹ ¹±¿´­ CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 8 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Measure Rating Impacts to residential N/A properties N/A No change Some residential property impacts Impacts to business N/A properties N/A No change Some business property impacts Consistency with community N/A goals Improvement in consistency with local goals No change Less consistent with community goals New or improved New multimodal connectivity multimodal facilities New highway connectivity No new local connectivity N/A Access to the interchange N/A area businesses that is both Access improvements in terms of improved geometry and safe and convenient maintained freeway access No change N/A State Planning Goal issues N/A State Planning Goals are enhanced No State Planning Goals are impacted Would have State Planning Goal impacts Environmental impacts Ю±ª·¼» ¿ º¿½·´·¬§ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ª±·¼­ ±® ³·²·³·¦»­ ¿¼ª»®­» ·³°¿½¬­ ¬± ²¿¬«®¿´ ¿²¼ ­±½·¿´ ®»­±«®½»­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¿®»¿ò ײ ¿®»¿­ ©¸»®» ·³°¿½¬­ ½¿²²±¬ ¾» ¿ª±·¼»¼ô »²­«®» ¬¸¿¬ ³·¬·¹¿¬·±² ·­ ´·µ»´§ ¬± ¾» º»¿­·¾´»ò ×¼»²¬·º§ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­ ¬± »²¸¿²½» ²¿¬«®¿´ ®»­±«®½» ¿²¼ ®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 9 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Objectives: ߪ±·¼ ±® ³·²·³·¦» ·³°¿½¬­ ¬± ¬¸» ²¿¬«®¿´ »²ª·®±²³»²¬ ·²½´«¼·²¹ ®·ª»®­ ¿²¼ ©¿¬»® ¾±¼·»­ô ®·°¿®·¿² ¦±²»­ô ©»¬´¿²¼­ ¿²¼ ¸¿¾·¬¿¬ ¿®»¿­ Ó·²·³·¦» ·³°¿½¬­ ¬± ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ »²ª·®±²³»²¬ ¿­ ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ·² ¬¸» ½±³³«²·¬§ ´·ª¿¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ »½±²±³·½ ª·¬¿´·¬§ ¹±¿´­ Í«°°±®¬ ´±½¿´ ­«­¬¿·²¿¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ ¹®»»²¸±«­» ¹¿­ ®»¼«½¬·±² ¹±¿´­ Ü»­·¹² º»¿¬«®»­ ¬¸¿¬ »²¸¿²½» ¿»­¬¸»¬·½ ¿°°»¿®¿²½» ¿²¼ ¿«¹³»²¬ ¬¸» ª·­«¿´ »²ª·®±²³»²¬ ©¸»®» °±­­·¾´» ×¼»²¬·º§ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»­ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ±® »²¸¿²½» °¿®µ ¿²¼ ®»½®»¿¬·±²¿´ ¿®»¿­ ±® ²¿¬«®¿´ ®»­±«®½»­ò Measures: ݸ¿²¹»­ ¬± ­§­¬»³ó©·¼» ª»¸·½´» ³·´»­ ¬®¿ª»´»¼ ø°®±¨§ º±® ÙØÙ ·³°¿½¬÷ ݸ¿²¹»­ ¬± ­§­¬»³ó©·¼» ª»¸·½´» ¼»´¿§ ø°®±¨§ º±® ÙØÙ ·³°¿½¬÷ ׳°¿½¬­ ¬± ©»¬´¿²¼­ ¿²¼ µ²±©² ¸¿¾·¬¿¬­ ׳°¿½¬­ ¬± °¿®µ­ ¿²¼ ¬®¿·´­ ׳°¿½¬­ ¬± É·´´¿³»¬¬» Ù®»»²©¿§ Ñ°°±®¬«²·¬§ ¬± ·²¬»¹®¿¬» ­¬¿¬» ­«­¬¿·²¿¾·´·¬§ ¹±¿´­ ·²¬± º¿½·´·¬§ ø»ò¹ò ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ®»«­» ±º ³¿¬»®·¿´­ô »¬½ò÷ ׳°¿½¬­ ¬± ½«´¬«®¿´ ¿²¼ ¸·­¬±®·½ ®»­±«®½»­ CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 10 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Measure Rating System wide Vehicle Miles Significant decrease in system VMT relative to no-build (> 1%) Traveled (VMT, as Modest decrease in system VMT relative to no-build (< 1%) measured in forecast regional travel demand No change in system VMT relative to no-build model) Proxy for Greenhouse Gas emissions Modest increase in system VMT relative to no-build (< 1%) System wide vehicle delay Significant decrease in system VHD relative to no-build (VHD, as measured in Modest decrease in system VHD relative to no-build forecast regional travel demand model) Proxy for No change in system VHD relative to no-build Greenhouse Gas emissions Modest increase in system VHD relative to no-build Impact to wetlands and N/A sensitive habitats Wetland areas are enhanced No wetland or habitat impacted Would have wetland and habitat impacts Impacts to parks and trails Non differentiator; all have minor impacts to isolated pieces of West Bank Trail and trail on the east side of the river, which could be mitigated in the design phase. Consistency with ODOT Cannot be evaluated at this time; sustainability goals focus on sustainability best practices construction methods, which will be considered during the design and construction phase. Impacts to historic and There are no known structures with historic status in the project cultural resources area, nor are there known cultural resources. Any alternative would undergo a cultural inventory before construction. Cost effectiveness Ю±ª·¼» ­±´«¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» ½±­¬ó»ºº»½¬·ª» ¿²¼ ½¿² ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ±ª»® ¬·³»ò Objectives: Ю±ª·¼» ­±´«¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ ½¿² ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ·² °¸¿­»­ ¬¸¿¬ °®±ª·¼» ·²½®»³»²¬¿´ ¾»²»º·¬ Ю±ª·¼» ¬·³»´§ ¿²¼ ½±­¬ó»ºº»½¬·ª» °®±¶»½¬ ­±´«¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ °»®º±®³ ¿­ ¼»­·¹²»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬ ¬¸»·® »¨°»½¬»¼ ¼»­·¹² ´·º» Ó·²·³·¦» ±²¹±·²¹ ±°»®¿¬·±²­ ¿²¼ ³¿·²¬»²¿²½» ½±­¬­ Measures: Ý¿² ¾» ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ·² °¸¿­»­ ¬¸¿¬ °®±ª·¼» ·²½®»³»²¬¿´ ¾»²»º·¬­ ݱ²­¬®«½¬·±² ½±­¬ Ñ°»®¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ³¿·²¬»²¿²½» ½±­¬ CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 11 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Measure Rating 1 N/A Ability to be phased Project that can be phased One phase project that is lower cost High cost that cannot be phased Construction cost Low – No new bridge structures required Medium – Some new bridge structures High – Major roadway/interchange reconstruction with new bridge structures Operation and maintenance Cannot be evaluated at this time cost Concept Evaluation ̸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬¿¾´» ­¸±©­ ¸±© »¿½¸ ±º ¬¸» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ ©»®» »ª¿´«¿¬»¼ ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¬¸» ¿¾±ª» ³»¿­«®»­ò 1 Phasing, by definition requires that each phase provides benefit and independent utility. CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 12 CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 14 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Appendix A: Alternative Concept Descriptions CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 15 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Low Build Concepts ̸» ´±© ¾«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ¿¬¬»³°¬ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ »¨·­¬·²¹ ¼»º·½·»²½·»­ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» «­» ±º ³·²·³¿´ ·²º®¿­¬®«½¬«®» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ò ̸®»» ´±© ¾«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ¿®» ½±²­·¼»®»¼ô ¿­ ¼·­½«­­»¼ ¾»´±©ò Low Build 1 Û¨¬»²¼­ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ ©»­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» ±ººó®¿³°­ ¬± Ü»´¬¿ íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò Ý«´ó¼»ó­¿½­ Ϋ¾§ ߪ»²«» ¿¬ 窻® α¿¼ ¬± ·³°®±ª» 窻® α¿¼ ¬®¿ºº·½ ±°»®¿¬·±²­ ø³¿§ ¿´´±© »³»®¹»²½§ ª»¸·½´» ¿½½»­­÷ò Low Build 2* * Low-build 2 treatments are shown in blue in the graphic above. Red treatments reflect those described in low-build 1.  ײ ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¬± ¬¸» Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ï ¬®»¿¬³»²¬­ô ¬¸·­ ½±²½»°¬ »¨¬»²¼­ ¬¸» íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» ±²ó®¿³°­ º®±³ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸» »¿­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¬± ²±®¬¸¾±«²¼ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ´±±° ø½´±ª»®÷ ©±«´¼ ¾» ³±¼·º·»¼ ¬± ·³°®±ª» ¼®·ª»® ´·²» ±º ­·¹¸¬ò ̸» »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ±²ó®¿³° ¬± Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ º®±³ 窻® ߪ»²«» ©±«´¼ ¾» ½´±­»¼ ¼«®·²¹ °»¿µ °»®·±¼­ ¬± ®»¼«½» ³»®¹·²¹ ½±²º´·½¬­ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ °±¬»²¬·¿´´§ ®»¼«½» ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª» ­¿º»¬§ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 16 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Low Build 3* * Low-build 3 treatments are shown in green in the graphic above. Blue treatments reflect those described in low-build 2. Red treatments reflect those described in low-build 1. ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ©±«´¼ ¿¼¼ ¿² »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²» íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ±² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«»óÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ô ©¸·½¸ ·­ ¬¸» ³±­¬ ½±²¹»­¬»¼ °±®¬·±² ±º ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ©±«´¼ ®»°´¿½» ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ±ººó®¿³° ¿¬ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ø½«®®»²¬´§ ¿ ´±±° ®¿³°÷ ©·¬¸ ¿ ²»© ¼·¿³±²¼ó­¬§´» ±ººó®¿³°ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ »´·³·²¿¬» ¬¸» ­¸±®¬ ³»®¹»ó ¼·ª»®¹» ³±ª»³»²¬ ¬¸¿¬ ±½½«®­ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ¬±¼¿§ò ̸·­ ²»© ±ººó®¿³° ´±½¿¬·±² ©±«´¼ ®»¯«·®» ¿ ­·¹²¿´·¦»¼ ·²¬»®­»½¬·±² ±² Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ½±³¾·²»¼ ©·¬¸ °±®¬·±²­ ±º Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ï ¿²¼ îò Medium Build Concepts Ó»¼·«³ ¾«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ¸¿ª» ´¿®¹»® º±±¬°®·²¬­ ¬¸¿² ¬¸» ´±© ¾«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ¿²¼ ®»¯«·®» ³±®» ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ¿²¼ ½¸¿²¹»­ ¬± ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ¸·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ò ̸»®» ¿®» ¬©± ½±²½»°¬­ ·² ¬¸» Ó»¼·«³ Þ«·´¼æ ׳°®±ª»¼ Û¨·­¬·²¹ ¿²¼ Ô±½¿´ ß®¬»®·¿´ò Medium Build: Improve Existing ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ °®±ª·¼»­ ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²» »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ 窻® α¿¼ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ®»½±²º·¹«®»­ ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ñÞ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ®¿³°­ ¬± ­·³°´·º§ ³»®¹» ¿²¼ ¼·ª»®¹» ³¿²»«ª»®­ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ­°¿½·²¹ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ´»²¹¬¸»²­ ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«»ó Ü·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ®¿³°­ ¬± ¿´´±© º±® ¿¼»¯«¿¬» ¿½½»´»®¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ¼»½»´»®¿¬·±² ¼·­¬¿²½»­ô ¿²¼ ©±«´¼ ¿´­± ·²½®»¿­» ®¿³° ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¿¬ 窻® α¿¼ ¬± ³»»¬ ¹®±©·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¼»³¿²¼­ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 17 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Medium Build: Local Arterial ˲¼»® ¬¸·­ ½±²½»°¬ô ¿ ²»© ¿®¬»®·¿´ ®·ª»® ½®±­­·²¹ ©±«´¼ ¾» íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ¶«­¬ ²±®¬¸ ±º ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿´·¹²³»²¬ò ̸·­ ©±«´¼ °®±ª·¼» ¿ ´±½¿´ ½±²²»½¬·±² ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ ¿²¼ Ù®»»² ß½®»­ ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼­ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ·²½´«¼»­ ³±¼·º·½¿¬·±²­ ¬± ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ñÞ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ®¿³°­ ¾«¬ ¼±»­ ²±¬ ¿¼¼ ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¬± ¬¸» ³¿·²´·²» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò Highway Corridor Concepts Ú±«® ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ®»¯«·®» ­·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ®»½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ¿²¼ ·²ª»­¬³»²¬ ·² ¬¸» ½±®®·¼±® ¿®» ½±²­·¼»®»¼ô ·²½´«¼·²¹æ Í°´·¬ Ü·¿³±²¼ô ß«¨·´·¿®§ Ô¿²»ô ݱ´´»½¬±®óÜ·­¬®·¾«¬±® α¿¼©¿§ô ¿²¼ ο³° Þ®¿·¼ ݱ²½»°¬ò Û¿½¸ ±º ¬¸»­» ½±²½»°¬­ ¿®» ¼·­½«­­»¼ ¾»´±©ò Split Diamond  ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ®»°®»­»²¬­ ¿ ½±³¾·²¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ³»¼·«³ ¾«·´¼ íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸»®»¾§ ½®»¿¬·²¹ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ³¿·²´·²» ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¿²¼ »²¸¿²½·²¹ ¬¸» ´±½¿´ ­¬®»»¬ ­§­¬»³ º±® ¿´´ ³±¼»­ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ¿´­± ½®»¿¬»­ ¿ ²»© ¹®¿¼»ó­»°¿®¿¬»¼ ±ª»®½®±­­·²¹ ±º Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ º±® 窻® ߪ»²«»óÜ·ª·­·±² ߪØÏÈØÚËØÜÉÔÏÖÉÕØlÊÍÑÔÉÙÔÜÐÎÏÙkÊÉÄÑØ ¿½½»­­ ©·¬¸ 窻® α¿¼ô °¿®¬·½«´¿®´§ ·² ¬¸» ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¼·®»½¬·±²ò ̸» Þ»´¬´·²» CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 18 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS Ø·¹¸©¿§ñÜ»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹» ©±«´¼ ¿´­± ¾» ®»ó½±²º·¹«®»¼ ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬¸» ³»®¹»ô ¼·ª»®¹» ¿²¼ ©»¿ª·²¹ ·­­«»­ò ̸»®» ¿®» ¿´­± ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² Þ»´¬´·²» ¿²¼ Ù±±¼°¿­¬«®» ×­´¿²¼ α¿¼ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ »¨·­¬·²¹ ±°»®¿¬·±²¿´ ¼»º·½·»²½·»­ ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» ¬©± ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ò Auxiliary Lane  ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ¿¼¼­ ¿² ¿«¨·´·¿®§ ¬®¿ª»´ ´¿²» ±² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·² íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ ¾±¬¸ ¼·®»½¬·±²­ ¾»¬©»»² 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ ¿ ²»© ³«´¬·³±¼¿´ ¿®¬»®·¿´ ®·ª»® ½®±­­·²¹ ¶«­¬ ²±®¬¸ ±º ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿´·¹²³»²¬ò ׬ ¿´­± ·²½´«¼»­ ®¿³° ®»½±²º·¹«®¿¬·±²­ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ »¨·­¬·²¹ ¼»º·½·»²½·»­ ¿­ ©»´´ ¿­ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ Ù±±¼°¿­¬«®» ×­´¿²¼ α¿¼ò Collector-Distributor éÕÔÊÚÎÏÚØÍÉÚËØÜÉØÊÜlÚÎÑÑØÚÉÎËÙÔÊÉËÔÛÈÉÎËkúùËÎÜÙÆÜÄ íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ °¿®¿´´»´ ¬± Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ º®±³ 窻®óÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» »¿­¬ ±º Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸·­ ÝóÜ ®±¿¼ ©±«´¼ º¿½·´·¬¿¬» ¬¸» ³»®¹·²¹ ¿²¼ ¼·ª»®¹·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸»­» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ ¬¸»®»¾§ ®»³±ª·²¹ ¬¸» º®·½¬·±² º®±³ ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ³¿·²´·²» ·² ¬¸·­ ­»¹³»²¬ò ̸» CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 19 BELTLINE FACILITY PLAN PHASE II: RIVER ROAD TO COBURG ROAD: CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS ½±²½»°¬ ©±«´¼ ¿´­± ®»½±²º·¹«®» ¬¸» ®¿³°­ ¿¬ ¬¸»­» ¬©± ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª» ±°»®¿¬·±²­ ¿´±²¹ ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ Ù±±¼ п­¬«®» ×­´¿²¼ α¿¼ò Ramp Braid  ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ °¸§­·½¿´´§ ¹®¿¼» ­»°¿®¿¬»­ ®¿³° ¬±ñº®±³ Ü»´¬¿ íËÎÓØÚÉùØÊÚËÔÍÉÔÎÏ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ 窻®óÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«» ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»­ô ¬¸»®»¾§ ­³±±¬¸·²¹ ±«¬ ¬®¿ºº·½ º´±©­ ·² ¬¸» ­¬«¼§ ¿®»¿ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ ½®»¿¬»­ ²»© Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ½¿°¿½·¬§ ¾»¬©»»² 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª»­ ±°»®¿¬·±²­ ±² ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò CONCEPT EVALUATION PROCESS_FEB23.DOC 20 Meeting Summary ûØÑÉÑÔÏØõÔÖÕÆÜÄ÷ÜÚÔÑÔÉÄíÑÜÏîÍØÏõÎÈÊØ BELTLINE HIGHWAY FACILITY PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 SUMMARY ¬¸·­ ­«³³¿®§ô ¾«¬ ¼± ²±¬ ¿ºº»½¬ ¬¸» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ ½±²½»°¬­ ¾»·²¹ ¼·­½«­­»¼ º±® ¬¸» Ú¿½·´·¬§ д¿²ò Summary of comments ̸·­ ¿²¼ ¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹ ½±³³»²¬­ ¿®» ­«³³¿®·»­ ±º ½±²ª»®­¿¬·±²­ô ½±³³»²¬­ ®»½»·ª»¼ ±² ¬¸» º´·° ½¸¿®¬­ô ©®·¬¬»² ½±³³»²¬ º±®³­ô ¿²¼ »³¿·´­ ¬± °®±¶»½¬ ­¬¿ººò ß º«´´ ®»½±®¼ ±º ¬¸» ½±³³»²¬ º±®³­ô ±²´·²» ­«®ª»§ ®»­°±²­»­ô ¿²¼ »³¿·´­ ­«¾³·¬¬»¼ ¿®» ¿¬¬¿½¸»¼ ¿­ ¿² ¿°°»²¼·¨ ¬± ¬¸·­ ³»³±ò ﮬ·½·°¿²¬­ ¿¬ ¬¸» ±°»² ¸±«­» ¸¿¼ ¿ ½¸¿²½» ¬± ©®·¬» ¬¸»·® ½±³³»²¬­ ®»¹¿®¼·²¹ ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ·² ¹»²»®¿´ò ̸»®» ©¿­ ¿ º´·° ½¸¿®¬ ©·¬¸ ³¿®µ»®­ ¬± ¿´´±© °»±°´» ¬± ½±³³»²¬ò ̸» ½±³³»²¬­ º®±³ ¬¸» º´·° ½¸¿®¬ ¿®» ·²½´«¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» ­«³³¿®§ò Evaluation Criteria ̸» ©®·¬¬»² ¿²¼ ±²´·²» ½±³³»²¬ º±®³ ¿­µ»¼ ©¸·½¸ »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ½®·¬»®·¿ ©¿­ ¬¸» ³±­¬ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¬± ®»­°±²¼»²¬­ò ̸» »ª¿´«¿¬·±² ½®·¬»®·¿ ½¿¬»¹±®·»­ ¿®» ´·­¬»¼ ¿­ ³±­¬ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¬± ´»¿­¬ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¿­ ·²¼·½¿¬»¼ ¾§ ®»­°±²­»­ ±² ¬¸» ©®·¬¬»² ½±³³»²¬ º±®³­æ Ó±¾·´·¬§ô ®»´·¿¾·´·¬§ô ¿²¼ ½±²²»½¬·ª·¬§ øïé÷ Í¿º»¬§ øïí÷ ݱ­¬ »ºº»½¬·ª»²»­­ øê÷ Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ·³°¿½¬­ øë÷ ݱ³³«²·¬§ ´·ª¿¾·´·¬§ ¿²¼ »½±²±³·½ ª·¬¿´·¬§ øí÷ Concepts to Study Further ̸» ©®·¬¬»² ¿²¼ ±²´·²» ½±³³»²¬ º±®³ ¿²¼ ¿² ±°»² ¸±«­» ¼·­°´¿§ ¿­µ»¼ ¿¬¬»²¼»»­ ¬± ·²¼·½¿¬» ¸±© ·²¬»®»­¬»¼ ¬¸»§ ©»®» ·² ©¸·½¸ ±º ¬¸» ¬»² ½±²½»°¬­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ­¬«¼·»¼ º«®¬¸»®ò íÜËÉÔÚÔÍÜÏÉÊÚÎÈÑÙÊØÑØÚÉ×ËÎÐlùØ×ÔÏÔÉØÑÄklðÜÄÛØklùÎÏiÉÊÉÈÙÄkÜÏÙlïÎÎÍÔÏÔÎÏk ̸» Ô±½¿´ Þ®·¼¹» ½±²½»°¬ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¬¸» ³±­¬ lùØ×ÔÏÔÉØÑÄÊÉÈÙÄkÇÎÉØÊ×ÎÑÑÎÆØÙÛÄÉÕØ ß«¨·´·¿®§ Ô¿²» ¿²¼ ׳°®±ª» Û¨·­¬·²¹ ½±²½»°¬­ò ̸» Í°´·¬ Ü·¿³±²¼ ¿²¼ ݱ´´»½¬±®ó Ü·­¬®·¾«¬±® ½±²½»°¬­ ¿´­± ®»½»·ª»¼ ­«°°±®¬ò Ú±® ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ­¸±«´¼ ²±¬ ¾» ­¬«¼·»¼ º«®¬¸»®ô Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ï ¿²¼ Ô±© Þ«·´¼ î ®»½»·ª»¼ ¬¸» ³±­¬ ª±¬»­ô º±´´±©»¼ ¾§ ¬¸» ο³° Þ®¿·¼ ½±²½»°¬ò ̸» º±´´±©·²¹ ¬¿¾´» ­¸±©­ ¬¸» ¬¿¾«´¿¬·±²­ º®±³ ¬¸» ½±³³»²¬ º±®³­ ¿²¼ ¬¸» ¼·­°´¿§ ª±¬·²¹ ¾±¿®¼ô ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ®»½»·ª»¼ ¬¸» ÐÎÊÉÇÎÉØÊÔÏÛÎÉÕÉÕØlùØ×ÔÏÔÉØÑÄÊÉÈÙÄkÜÏÙlùÎÏiÉÊÉÈÙÄkÕÔÖÕÑÔÖÕÉØÙ OPENHOUSE2SUMMARYMARCH30_SAV.DOC 2 BELTLINE HIGHWAY FACILITY PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 SUMMARY Of the ten concepts presented, which do you think should be studied more in the future? Definitely 2121241322 7 8 2 2 11 Maybe 9 4 7 7 7 11 5 8 7 5 Don’t 51411 7 4 2 5 8 5 13 study No opinion 1 4 4 2 0 0 1 0 1 3 Concerns with Concepts Ó¿²§ ±º ¬¸±­» ©¸± ½±³³»²¬»¼ ©»®» ½±²½»®²»¼ ¿¾±«¬ ½±­¬ò Í»ª»®¿´ °»±°´» ©¿²¬»¼ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ³±²»§ ¬± ¾» «­»¼ »ºº·½·»²¬´§ô ¿²¼ ©¿²¬»¼ ¿ ½±³°®»¸»²­·ª» »²±«¹¸ ­±´«¬·±² ­± ³±®» ³±²»§ ©±«´¼ ²±¬ ¸¿ª» ¬± ¾» ­°»²¬ ¿¬ ¿ ´¿¬»® ¼¿¬»ò Ѭ¸»® ½±³³»²¬­ ·²½´«¼»¼ ½±²½»®²­ ¿¾±«¬ ¬¸» ¸·¹¸ ½±­¬ ±º ³±­¬ ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ ¿­ ¬¸»®» ·­ ²± ³±²»§ ¿´´±¬¬»¼ º±® ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ¿¬ ¬¸·­ ¬·³»ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ©¿­ ½±²½»®²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ º´§±ª»® º®±³ ²±®¬¸¾±«²¼ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¬± ©»­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ©¿­ ²±¬ ¾»·²¹ ½±²­·¼»®»¼ò Ì©± ±¬¸»® ¿¬¬»²¼»»­ ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬»³°±®¿®§ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ©»®» ²±¬ ¿ ¹±±¼ ·¼»¿å ¾·¹ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ©±«´¼ ¸¿²¼´» ¬®¿ºº·½ º±® ¬¸» ²»¨¬ íðóì𠧻¿®­ ¿®» ²»»¼»¼ò ß²±¬¸»® °»®­±² ©¿²¬»¼ ¬¸» ¾®·¼¹»­ ¾«·´¬ ²±© ©·¬¸±«¬ ¿²§ º«®¬¸»® ·³°¿½¬ ­¬«¼·»­ò Ѳ» ½±³³»²¬»® ©¿­ ·²¬»®»­¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ½±²­·¼»®·²¹ ¿ ®·ª»® ½®±­­·²¹ ²±®¬¸ ±® ­±«¬¸ ±º ݱ¾«®¹ º®±³ ×óë ¬± 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ççò Ѳ» ½±³³»²¬ ±² ¬¸» ÌÜÓñÌÍÓ ½±²½»°¬ ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ³»¿­«®»­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ²±© ¬± ¸»´° ¿´´»ª·¿¬» ¬®¿ºº·½ °®±¾´»³ «²¬·´ ¿² ¿°°®±°®·¿¬» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª» ·­ ­»´»½¬»¼ò ø̸·­ º¿½·´·¬§ °´¿² ©·´´ ½±²­·¼»® ­¸±®¬ ¬»®³ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ·²½´«¼» ÌÜÓñÌÍÓ ³»¿­«®»­ ¿¬ ¬¸» »²¼ ±º ¬¸» °®±½»­­÷ò Ú±® ¬¸» Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ô ¿¬¬»²¼»»­ ©»®» ½±²½»®²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ²±¬ »¨°¿²¼·²¹ ¬¸» É·´´¿³»¬¬» 窻® ¾®·¼¹» ©±«´¼ ²±¬ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ·­­«»­ ±² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô º±«® °»±°´» ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ±°¬·±²­ ¼± ²±¬ º·¨ ¬¸» °®±¾´»³­ ¿²¼ ¼± ²±¬ ¿¼¼ ¿²§ ½¿°¿½·¬§ º±® º«¬«®» ¹®±©¬¸ò ß²±¬¸»® °»®­±² ¼·¼ ²±¬ ©¿²¬ ¬± ­»» ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«» ±²ó®¿³° ¬± Þ»´¬´·²» õÔÖÕÆÜÄÚÑÎÊØÙnËØÍÎËÉÔÏÖÉÕÜÉÔÉÆÜÊÙÔ××ÔÚÈÑɬ± ³¿µ» ¿ ´»º¬ ¿¬ ¬¸» ´·¹¸¬ ±² 窻® α¿¼ ¬± ¹»¬ ±²¬± ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ô ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿ ²«³¾»® ±º «­»®­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ¿¬ ¿ ¼·­¿¼ª¿²¬¿¹»ò Ì©± ½±³³»²¬»®­ ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ½´±­·²¹ Ϋ¾§ ߪ»²«» ·² Ô±© Þ«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ©±«´¼ ¿¼¼ ³±®» ¬®¿ºº·½ ±²¬± 窻® α¿¼ò Ѳ» ½±³³»²¬ ±² ¬¸» ß«¨·´·¿®§ Ô¿²» ½±²½»°¬ ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ­¿²¼ ¿²¼ ¹®¿ª»´ ¬®«½µ­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ­´±© «­·²¹ ¬¸» ±ª»®½®±­­·²¹ ¿¬ 窻® ߪ»²«»ñÜ·ª·­·±² ߪ»²«»ò Ѳ» °»®­±² º±«²¼ ¬¸» Í°´·¬ Ü·¿³±²¼ ½±²º«­·²¹ ¿²¼ ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿¼¼·²¹ ³»¬»®»¼ ®¿³°­ ©±«´¼ ¾» ³±®» ½±­¬ »ºº»½¬·ª»ò OPENHOUSE2SUMMARYMARCH30_SAV.DOC 3 BELTLINE HIGHWAY FACILITY PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 SUMMARY ݱ²½»®²­ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ο³° Þ®¿·¼ ±°ÉÔÎÏÆØËØÉÕÜÉÔÉÆÜÊlÎÇØËÛÈÔÑÙÔÏÖkÜÏÙÉÕÜÉÉÕØÉÔÐØÜÏÙ »¨°»²­» ±º ¬¸» ±°¬·±² ­¸±«´¼ ¾» »²±«¹¸ ¬± ®»³±ª» ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬ º±® º«®¬¸»® ½±²­·¼»®¿¬·±²ô ­·²½» ¬¸» ±¬¸»® ½±²½»°¬­ ¸¿ª» ¾»¬¬»® ¾»²»º·¬­ ©·¬¸ ´»­­ ½±­¬ ¿²¼ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² ¬·³»ò Ѭ¸»® ½±³³»²¬»®­ ©»®» ½±²½»®²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»®» ©¿­ ¿ ¸·¹¸ »²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ·³°¿½¬ ¿­­±½·¿¬»¼ ©·¬¸ ¬¸·­ ½±²½»°¬ô ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ·¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ½±²º«­·²¹ º±® «­»®­ ±² ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ¯«»­¬·±²»¼ ¬¸» ²»»¼ º±® ¿ ²»© ¾®·¼¹» ±ª»® ¬¸» ®·ª»® ¿²¼ ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ «°¹®¿¼·²¹ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ¾®·¼¹» ¬± ¸¿²¼´» ¬®¿ºº·½ò ß²±¬¸»® ½±³³»²¬»® ©®±¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¿´´ ¬¸» ´¿®¹»® ½±²½»°¬­ ¬»¿® «° ³±®» ´¿²¼ º±® ¿«¬±³±¾·´»­ô °±¬»²¬·¿´´§ ¼»­¬®±§·²¹ ·¬ º±® °»¼»­¬®·¿²­ ¿²¼ ¾·½§½´»­ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ©¿­ ½±²½»®²»¼ ©·¬¸ ¿ ´·¹¸¬ ±² Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ º±® ²±®¬¸¾±«²¼ ¬®¿ºº·½ ½±³·²¹ º®±³ »¿­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸» ½±²½»®² ©¿­ ¬¸» ±°»®¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸» ­¬±° ´·¹¸¬­ ¿²¼ ª»¸·½´» ¾¿½µ«°­ ±² ¬¸» ¸·¹¸©¿§ò Concepts to Study More No Build Ѳ» °»®­±² ©®±¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ²± ¾«·´¼ ±°¬·±² ©¿­ º«´´§ º«²¼»¼ò TDM/TSM Measures ̸®»» ¿¬¬»²¼»»­ ½±³³»²¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ÌÜÓñÌÍÓ ³»¿­«®»­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ²±© ½·¬·²¹ ¬¸» ´±© ½±­¬ ¿²¼ ·³³»¼·¿¬» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ´·ª¿¾·´·¬§ ­¸±«´¼ º±½«­ ±² ³±¼»­ ±¬¸»® ¬¸¿² ¿«¬±³±¾·´»­ò Low Build Ѳ» °»®­±² ½±³³»²¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ´±© ¾«·´¼ î ¿²¼ í ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬®¿ºº·½ ·­­«»­ò Improve Existing Ѳ» ¿¬¬»²¼»» ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ·³°®±ª» »¨·­¬·²¹ ½±²½»°¬ ½±«´¼ ¾» ·³°´»³»²¬»¼ ­±±²»® ¿²¼ ©±«´¼ ¾» ½±­¬ »ºº»½¬·ª»ô ´»­­ ¼·­®«°¬·ª»ô ©±«´¼ ¿ª±·¼ ±ª»® ¾«·´¼·²¹ò ̸·­ ½±²½»°¬ ½±«´¼ ´»¿ª» º«²¼·²¹ ¿ª¿·´¿¾´» º±® ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¾·µ»ñ°»¼»­¬®·¿² ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ò Arterial Bridge Í·¨ °»±°´» ½±³³»²¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ©±«´¼ ´·µ» ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ ¬»¿³ ¬± ­¬«¼§ ¬¸» ¿®¬»®·¿´ ¾®·¼¹» º«®¬¸»®ò ̸»§ ´·µ»¼ ¬¸» ´±½¿´ ½±²²»½¬·±² ±°¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¾®·¼¹» ©±«´¼ °®±ª·¼» ¿²¼ ¸¿ª·²¹ ¿² ¿´¬»®²¿¬» ®±«¬» ¬± ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ É·´´¿³»¬¬» 窻® ¾®·¼¹»­ò Ѭ¸»® ½±³³»²¬»®­ ´·µ»¼ ¬¸» ¿¾·´·¬§ ¬± ¿¼¼ ¾·½§½´» ¿²¼ °»¼»­¬®·¿² º¿½·´·¬·»­ ¿²¼ ¬®¿²­·¬ ¬± ¬¸» ¿®¬»®·¿´ ¾®·¼¹»ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¿¼¼·²¹ ¿ ­·¹²¿´ ¿¬ Ù®»»² ß½®»­ º±® ©»­¬¾±«²¼ ¿²¼ ²±®¬¸¾±«²¼ Ü»´¬¿ ¬®¿ºº·½ò Split Diamond Ì©± °»±°´» ´·µ»¼ ¬¸» ­°´·¬ ¼·¿³±²¼ ½±²½»°¬ô ¾«¬ ±²» °»®­±² ¸¿¼ ½±²½»®²­ ©·¬¸ ¬¸» ±ª»®¿´´ ½±­¬ò Auxiliary Lane Ѳ» °»®­±² ´·µ»¼ ¬¸» ·¼»¿ ±º ¬¸» ¿«¨·´·¿®§ ´¿²» ½±²½»°¬ò Increasing Lanes over the River OPENHOUSE2SUMMARYMARCH30_SAV.DOC 4 BELTLINE HIGHWAY FACILITY PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 SUMMARY Ú±«® ½±³³»²¬»®­ ¼·¼ ²±¬ °·½µ ¿ ­°»½·º·½ ½±²½»°¬ ¬± ­¬«¼§ º«®¬¸»®ô ¾«¬ ³»²¬·±²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ©±«´¼ ´·µ» ³±®» ´¿²»­ ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» ®·ª»®ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ©®±¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ¾®·¼¹» ·­ ¿ ¼¿²¹»®±«­ ¾±¬¬´»²»½µô ¿²¼ ­¿º»¬§ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ­¸±«´¼ ¾» ¿¼¼»¼ô ¿²±¬¸»® ¬¸±«¹¸¬ ¬¸¿¬ ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬¸» ¿³±«²¬ ±º ³»®¹·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ©±«´¼ ·³°®±ª» ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ß º»© ±¬¸»® ½±³³»²¬»®­ ©»®» ·²¬»®»­¬»¼ ·² ®»°´¿½·²¹ ¿²¼ ©·¼»²·²¹ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ É·´´¿³»¬¬» 窻® ¾®·¼¹»­ ¬± ·²½®»¿­» ­¿º»¬§ ¿²¼ ·³°®±ª» ½±²¹»­¬·±²ò Other suggestions Ѳ» °»®­±² º»´¬ ¬¸¿¬ ²±²» ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ ¿­ °®»­»²¬»¼ ©»®» ¾§ ¬¸»³­»´ª»­ ¬¸» ¾»­¬ ­±´«¬·±²ò ̸» ­«¹¹»­¬·±² ©¿­ ¬± ®»¼»­·¹² ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬ °´¿²­ ¾§ ·²¬»¹®¿¬·²¹ ¬¸» ¾»­¬ ·¼»¿­ º®±³ »¿½¸ô ¿²¼ ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ º±½«­·²¹ ±² ¬¸» ¿®»¿ ±² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¾»¬©»»² ݱ¾«®¹ô 窻® α¿¼ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ·²¬»®½¸¿²¹»ò ̸·­ °»®­±² ­«°°±®¬»¼ ¿² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¾®·¼¹» ±ª»® ¬¸» ®·ª»® ·² ²±®¬¸ Û«¹»²» ¿²¼ ­¬±° ´·¹¸¬­ ¬± ®»¹«´¿¬» ¬®¿ºº·½ º´±© ±²¬± Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ©¿­ ·²¬»®»­¬»¼ ·² °¸¿­·²¹ ¬¸» ´±©»® ½±­¬ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ øÌÜÓ ³»¿­«®»­ ­«½¸ ¿­ ®¿³° ³»¬»®·²¹ô »¬½÷ ©·¬¸ ³±®» »ºº»½¬·ª»ô ´±²¹»® ¬»®³ ¾«·´¼ ±°¬·±²­ ¬¸¿¬ ¿¼¼®»­­ °®±¾´»³­ ±º ½±²¹»­¬·±² ¿²¼ ³±¾·´·¬§ô ¾«¬ ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ ²»»¼ ¬± ¾» »¨°´±®»¼ º«®¬¸»® ©·¬¸ ³±®» ¼»¬¿·´ò ̸» ³±­¬ »ºº»½¬·ª» ¾«·´¼ ½±²½»°¬­ ©±«´¼ ®»¾«·´¼ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ¾®·¼¹» ±ª»® Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¿¬ Ù±±¼°¿­¬«®» ×­´¿²¼ α¿¼ô ¿²¼ ´±±µ·²¹ ¿¬ »¨¬»²¼·²¹ ¿ ¾®·¼¹» ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» ®·ª»® ¿¬ ¬¸» Ê¿´´»§ 窻® Ý»²¬»®ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¿²§ ±º ¬¸» ¸·¹¸»®ó¾«·´¼ ±°¬·±²­ ©±«´¼ ¿¼¼®»­­ ¬¸» ¬®¿ºº·½ ·­­«» ±² Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ô ²±¬·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ ¿²§¬¸·²¹ ´»­­ ¬¸¿² ¼±«¾´·²¹ ¬¸» ´¿²»­ ±º ¬®¿ºº·½ º®±³ 窻® α¿¼ ¬± Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ©±«´¼ ²±¬ ­·¹²·º·½¿²¬´§ ·³°®±ª» ½±²¹»­¬·±²ò ß²±¬¸»® °»®­±² ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ±² ®¿³°­ º®±³ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¬± ©»­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ²»»¼ ¬± ¾» ·³°®±ª»¼ô ¿²¼ ¬¸» 窻® ߪ»²«» ¬± »¿­¬¾±«²¼ Þ»´¬´·²» ®¿³°­ ²»»¼»¼ ¬± ¾» »¨¬»²¼»¼ò ß ¬¸·®¼ °»®­±² ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ¿¼¼·²¹ ´¿²»­ ·² »¿½¸ ¼·®»½¬·±² ¿¬ ¬¸» Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ײ¬»®½¸¿²¹»ò üÏÎÉÕØËÍØËÊÎÏÊÈÖÖØÊÉØÙÐÜÒÔÏÖÉËÜ××ÔÚlÑÎÚÜÑkÐÎÇÔÏÖÆÔÉÕÔÏÜÑÔÐÔÉØÙËØÖÔÎÏÐÜÒÔÏÖ ¼®·ª·²¹ ³±®» »²¶±§¿¾´» ¿²¼ »²¸¿²½·²¹ ¿ ­»²­» ±º ½±³³«²·¬§ ±® ²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ò General Comments ß º»© °»±°´» ­«¹¹»­¬»¼ ±¬¸»® ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± ¿¼¼®»­­ ½±²¹»­¬·±² ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ̸»­» ¿®» ¾»´±©æ ùÎÏÎÉÚÑÎÊØÎÏËÜÐÍëÔÇØËüÇØÏÈØnÊÉËÔÍØÉÕØËÎÜÙÆÜÄÜÏÙÜÙÙÊÔÖÏÜÖØÑÔÒØùØÑÉÜ Ø·¹¸©¿§ò Ûª»®§±²» ¬®»¿¬­ ·¬ ¿­ ¿ ³»®¹»ò Þ«·´¼ ¿² ×óë ½±²²»½¬·±² ²±®¬¸ ±® ­±«¬¸ ±º ݱ¾«®¹ ¿½®±­­ ¬¸» ®·ª»® ¬± 窻® α¿¼ò з½µ «° ¬®¿ºº·½ º®±³ Ø·¹¸©¿§ ççò ̸·­ ©·´´ ¾» ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¿º¬»® ¬¸» ¶¿·´ ¿²¼ ¸±­°·¬¿´ ¾«·´¼·²¹­ ¿®» ½±²­¬®«½¬»¼ ¬± ®»´·»ª» ¬®¿ºº·½ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ò ͬ¿½µ Þ®·¼¹»­ ±ª»® ¬¸» ®·ª»® ±²» »¿­¬ô ±²» ©»­¬ Þ«·´¼ ¿ ¾®·¼¹» º®±³ ݸ¿³¾»®­ ¬± Ê¿´´»§ 窻® ¿®»¿ò Ì®¿ºº·½ º®±³ ¬±©² ½±«´¼ «­» ¬¸¿¬ ®±«¬» ¿²¼ ¬¸» ÒÉ »¨°®»­­©¿§ ¬± ¹»¬ ¬± Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ô ®»¼«½·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ ±² 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ ´»­­ ¬®¿ºº·½ ±² ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» ¿²¼ Ü»´¬¿ Ø·¹¸©¿§­ò Ò± α«²¼¿¾±«¬­ò OPENHOUSE2SUMMARYMARCH30_SAV.DOC 5 BELTLINE HIGHWAY FACILITY PLAN OPEN HOUSE #2 SUMMARY ùØÊÔÖÏÜÉØÉÕØÚØÏÉØËÑÜÏØÊÎ×ÛËÔÙÖØÜÊlðÔÏÔÐÈÐ ÐÍÕkÜÑÑÎÆÔÏÖÉËÜ××ÔÚÉÎ×ÑÎÆ ¾»¬¬»®ò Û¨¬»²¼ ¬¸» »¿­¬¾±«²¼ ³»®¹·²¹ ´¿²» ­¬®·°·²¹ º«®¬¸»® »¿­¬ ±² 窻® ߪ»²«»ò ׳°®±ª» §·»´¼ ­·¹²¿¹» ¿¬ 窻® ߪ»²«» ±² ®¿³° ©·¬¸ ­¬®·°»­ ¿²¼ ­·¹²­ Ѭ¸»® ½±³³»²¬­ ©»®» ½±²½»®²»¼ ©·¬¸ ³¿·²¬¿·²·²¹ ¬¸» ®·ª»® ¬®¿·´ ¿²¼ ¾·µ» °¿¬¸ô ©¸·½¸»ª»® ½±²½»°¬ ·­ ½¸±­»²ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ²±¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ °»¼»­¬®·¿² ­¿º»¬§ ¿¬ 窻® α¿¼ ¿²¼ Í·´ª»® Ô¿²» ©¿­ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ ¾»½¿«­» ±º ¬¸» ¸·¹¸ ­½¸±±´ò ß²±¬¸»® ¿¬¬»²¼»» ©¿­ ½±²½»®²»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» °´¿²²·²¹ ·­ ¾»·²¹ ¼±²» ©·¬¸±«¬ ½±²­¬®«½¬·±² º«²¼·²¹ò Ѳ» ½±³³»²¬»® ©¿­ ½±²½»®²»¼ ¿¾±«¬ °±­­·¾´» ¼±«¾´» ´»º¬­ñ®·¹¸¬­ ¿¬ Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ ߪ»²«» ¿²¼ 窻® α¿¼ô »­°»½·¿´´§ ·³°¿½¬­ ¬± ¬¸» ÐØÓÙ Í¿²¬¿ Ý´¿®¿ Ý´·²·½ò ׳°®±ª»¼ ³±¾·´·¬§ ¿´±²¹ Þ»´¬´·²» ·­ ·³°±®¬¿²¬ º±® º®»·¹¸¬ô »³»®¹»²½§ ª»¸·½´» ¿½½»­­ ¿²¼ ¹»²»®¿´ »½±²±³·½ ª·¬¿´·¬§ò ß² ¿¬¬»²¼»» ©®±¬» ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸» ±°»² ¸±«­» ©¿­ ¿ ¹±±¼ »ª»²¬ô ¿²¼ ¿°°®»½·¿¬»¼ ¬¸» °®»­»²¬¿¬·±² ±º ¼·ºº»®»²¬ ±°¬·±²­ò ̸» ½±²½»°¬ »ª¿´«¿¬·±²­ ©»®» ª»®§ ¸»´°º«´ ·² ©±®µ·²¹ ¬¸®±«¹¸ ¬¸» ¼»½·­·±² ³¿µ·²¹ °®±½»­­ò Ѳ» °»®­±² ©¿²¬»¼ ¬± º±½«­ ±² ³»¬¸±¼­ ¬± ®»¼«½» ¬®¿ºº·½ ·²­¬»¿¼ ±º ¾«·´¼·²¹ ³±®» ®±¿¼­ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ®»¼«½» °±°«´¿¬·±²ô ·²½®»¿­» ¾·µ»ñ°»¼»­¬®·¿² ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±²ô ¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» «­»®ó º®·»²¼´§ ¿®»¿­ô ¿²¼ ·²½®»¿­» ¬®¿²­·¬ ®·¼»®­¸·°ò Build it now Ú±«® °»±°´» ©¿²¬»¼ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬­ ¬± ¾»¹·² ·³³»¼·¿¬»´§ô ¿²¼ ¼·¼ ²±¬ ©¿²¬ ¬± ©¿·¬ º±® ¬¸» °´¿²²·²¹ °®±½»­­ò Ó±­¬ ½·¬»¼ ¬¸» »¨·­¬·²¹ ²»»¼ò Renaming Û·¹¸¬ °»±°´» ½±³³»²¬»¼ ¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»§ ¼·¼ ²±¬ ¿¹®»» ©·¬¸ ¬¸» »ºº±®¬ ¬± ®»²¿³» ¬¸» Þ»´¬´·²» Ø·¹¸©¿§ ¬¸» ο²¼§ п°» Þ»´¬©¿§ò Ó±­¬ °»±°´» ¬¸±«¹¸¬ ¬¸¿¬ ­¬¿¬» º«²¼­ ½±«´¼ ¾» «­»¼ ·² ±¬¸»® ©¿§­ò OPENHOUSE2SUMMARYMARCH30_SAV.DOC 6