Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item C: Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendment
ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY Work Session: Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendment Meeting Date: May 10, 2010 Agenda Item: C Department: Planning & Development Staff Contact: Amanda Nobel Flannery www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5535 ISSUE STATEMENT The council will review comments on a proposed ordinance to amend the Central Eugene Project (Downtown) Urban Renewal Plan received from the public, Planning Commission, and overlapping taxing districts. As a result of the review, the council may direct the City Manager to prepare amendments to the ordinance prior to consideration of the ordinance on May 24. BACKGROUND The council’s discussion of downtown revitalization is part of a larger conversation on local economic development actions. (See Attachment A for a summary of council discussions and actions and public involvement over the past year on fostering a vibrant downtown and boosting the local economy.) On March 8, 2010, the URA Board initiated a process to amend the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan as a funding option for a package of downtown projects. The proposed amendments would: 1)increase the maximum indebtedness (spending limit) by $16.15 million to a total of $49.15 million to cover the four specific projects described below, 2)expand the Downtown District boundary to be able to provide assistance for a potential Veterans Affairs (VA) clinic project, and 3)terminate the Downtown District as soon as sufficient funds are collected to pay for those projects. th The four projects are: 1) assistance to Lane Community College (LCC) for development on the 10 and Charnelton Development Site; 2) additional downtown urban renewal assistance in funding the Broadway Place Garages so that the garages remain available and in good condition to support other development and redevelopment in downtown (and, at the same time, to enable improvements to public th safety downtown); 3) assistance with a VA clinic, if the 12 and Willamette site is selected by the VA; and 4) infrastructure improvements to the Parks Blocks to provide better opportunities for the Farmers’ Market. State law requires a “substantial plan amendment” for the council to increase the maximum indebtedness or to increase the district boundary by more than 1 percent. The substantial amendment process requires a mailed notification to all Eugene property owners; review by the Planning Commission; notification to other impacted taxing districts; and a public hearing. The proposed ordinance for the 2010 amendments is included as Attachment B. (The proposed plan as amended and the report on the plan are included as Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100510\S100510C.doc Exhibit A to the ordinance.) The public record (submitted written comment, copies of the notices, and Planning Commission minutes) is in a binder in the Council Office for review by councilors. (The th public may access the public record at the front desk of the Atrium Building at 99 West 10 Avenue.) Public Comment: A public notice was mailed to Eugene property owners on March 19. On April 19, the council held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance and extended the period for citizens’ comments to May 3. Thirty-one individuals spoke at the hearing. Comments submitted via email and in writing are included as Attachment C. Planning Commission: The Planning Commission discussed the amendments on March 29 and adopted a motion recommending “council approval of the amendments based on the Planning Commission’s review of the proposed new boundary and the four new projects contemplated in the Plan with respect to their consistency with the City’s land use policies. The motion does not include consideration of the financial aspects of the plan.” (Passed 5:1 Warnes opposed). Minutes from the Planning Commission meeting are Attachment D. Taxing Districts: The overlapping taxing districts (School District 4J, Lane Education Service District, Lane Community College, and Lane County) were notified in writing on March 12 of the proposed plan amendments and provided a copy of the plan and report. The School District 4J Board of Directors discussed the Downtown District on April 21 and is scheduled to act on the superintendent’s recommendation to support the plan amendment on May 5. Results of the May 5 meeting will be provided to council prior to the work session. (Information on the fiscal impact to School District 4J from the Downtown Urban Renewal District was provided in the April 19 public hearing Agenda Item Summary.) No comments were received from Lane ESD. The LCC Board of Directors discussed the proposed plan amendment and the Downtown District on March 17. Chief Human Resources Officer Dennis Carr spoke on behalf of LCC in support of the proposed ordinance at the council’s public hearing on April 19. The Board of County Commissioners for Lane County (BCC) reviewed an urban renewal presentation from the County Assessor on April 7 and discussed their response to the City on April 13, 27, and 28. Attachment E includes the two letters that the BCC submitted, dated April 9 and April 28. (Approval of the April 28 letter passed 4:1 with Commissioner Stewart voting in opposition.) RELATED CITY POLICIES Downtown revitalization and the projects referenced in this material are supported by the Downtown Plan, council’s 2009 Vision & Goals, and a number of plans and reports related to downtown. A number of financial policies would guide the creation of the final finance plan, including the City’s debt policies. COUNCIL OPTIONS 1.Vote on the ordinance as written on May 24. 2.Provide modifications to the proposed plan amendment at the May 10 work session, and vote on the revised ordinance on May 24. Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100510\S100510C.doc CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION Based on the comments received, the City Manager recommends moving forward with the proposed plan amendment. SUGGESTED MOTION Information only; no motion is necessary unless council wishes to pursue option #2. ATTACHMENTS A.Summary of Council Discussions/Actions and Public Involvement on Economic Development & Downtown B.Proposed Ordinance Amending the Urban Renewal Plan (Exhibit A: Proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan & Accompanying Report) C.Public Written Comment D.Planning Commission Minutes from March 29, 2010 E.Lane County BCC Written Comment ** NOTE: The public record (submitted written comment, copies of the notices, and Planning Commission minutes) are included in a binder that will be located in the Council Office prior to the May 10, 2010, work session and will also be available at the work session. FOR MORE INFORMATION Development Contact: Amanda Nobel Flannery, Development Analyst Telephone: 541-682-5535 Staff E-Mail: amanda.nobelflannery@ci.eugene.or.us Finance Contact: Sue Cutsogeorge, Finance Director Telephone: 541-682-5589 Staff E-Mail: sue.l.cutsogeorge@ci.eugene.or.us Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100510\S100510C.doc ATTACHMENT A Summary of Council Discussions/Actions and Public Involvement on Economic Development & Downtown City Council’s discussion of downtown revitalization is part of a larger conversation on local economic development actions. Part I provides a summary of discussions and decisions related to downtown from the past year. Part II is a summary of public involvement on downtown revitalization and the proposed downtown urban renewal plan amendments. PART I April 19, 2010: Council held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Thirty-one individuals spoke, including representatives from Eugene Redevelopment Advisory Committee, Lane Community College, Lord Leebrick Theatre Company, Eugene Public Library Foundation, Eugene Association of Realtors, League of Women Voters, PeaceHealth, Downtown Neighborhood Association, Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce, and Downtown Eugene Inc. In response to a request, council extended the comment period by 14 days to May 3 at 5pm (passed 7:0 Solomon absent). March 8, 2010: Council reviewed four funding options for the downtown revitalization projects. Council moved to forward to the Planning Commission and overlapping taxing districts the proposed amendments to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, consistent with the draft plan and report included in Attachments K and L (passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed). Council also requested the City Manager to complete the analysis on the financial impact on 4J and, should there be a financial impact, to come back with ways to keep 4J whole, either through the exchange of services or through financial help (passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed). February 22, 2010: Council resumed discussion of the remaining motions that were already on the table from the February 10 work session and voted as follows: 1.d. Present to the Urban Renewal Agency Board for its review a proposed amendment to the downtown urban renewal plan that would 1) restrict the use of tax increment funds and increase the spending limit to pay for (i) the Broadway Place Garages’ debt, thereby freeing up funds for additional police officers for downtown public safety and property crime reduction, and (ii) not more than three other projects if their inclusion is approved by later motions, and 2) terminate the downtown urban renewal district as soon as the projects are paid for or sufficient funds are collected to fund those projects. In addition, present to the council, at the same time that the City Manager brings forward a draft amendment to the urban renewal plan, an analysis of both a local option levy and a general obligation bond, instead of tax increment financing, to fund the specified projects. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) 1.e. Bring back to council this spring a proposed ordinance requiring vacant properties to pay Downtown Service District fees; and (Passed 7:1 Clark opposed) 1.f. Work with Downtown Eugene, Inc. and the Chamber of Commerce on partnerships and other funding strategies with a goal of achieving $350,000 in revenue. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) 1g: Direct the City Manager to limit new annual expenditures for the downtown safety initiative to $2.2 million. (Passed 7:1 Clark opposed) th 2. Include for the proposed downtown Lane Community College development at 10 and Charnelton $8 million as part of a proposed urban renewal plan amendment, local option levy, and general obligation bond, a portion of which can facilitate a public plaza or open space area at that site and potentially a downtown public safety substation. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) 3. Include as part of a proposed urban plan amendment, local option levy, and general obligation bond, an additional $500,000 for improvements to the Parks Blocks to enhance that area for the Farmers’ Market. (Passed 5:3 Brown, Solomon, Taylor opposed) 4. If the VA pursues PeaceHealth’s Willamette Street site for a new VA Clinic, include the VA Clinic as part of a proposed urban renewal plan amendment, local option levy, and general obligation bond. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) 5. Pursue additional grant opportunities for steam conversion and electric vehicle charging stations. (Passed 8:0) 6. To look for all other possible sources of funding for the LCC project, aside from a GO bond or levy and excluding the use of Facility Reserves, and including the Urban Renewal funds we currently have. (Passed 7:1 Brown opposed) February 10, 2010: Council reviewed the City Manager’s recommendation for downtown projects and funding options. Council adopted three motions prior to postponing the remainder of the discussion to February 22. 1. a. Use $100,000 of one-time existing urban renewal dollars to purchase and install additional lighting downtown and $100,000 of one-time dollars (½ from telecomm and ½ from existing urban renewal) to purchase automated behavior crime reporting software and cameras, but only after the Council approves the Manager’s plan for number, location, use and on-going costs of the cameras, after considering the cameras expected effectiveness in deterring crime. (passed 8:0) 1. b. Pursue use of Springfield jail beds to include the exchange for Springfield’s use of Eugene Fire’s Training Center. (Passed 5:3 Brown, Taylor, Zelenka opposed) 1. c. Include in the Manager’s proposed FY11 budget $500,000 of the City’s HSC contribution for partial funding of the downtown safety initiative, including additional services like Cahoots. (passed 8:0) Moved to postpone (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) January 11, 2010: Council reviewed funding options and discussed connections between options and seven specific projects. December 14, 2009: Council reviewed eight specific projects to implement the four strategies for downtown revitalization. October 21, 2009: Council approved continuing downtown discussions according to a set revitalization process and requested staff to return with specific projects and potential tools to implement four strategies for downtown revitalization. September 14, 2009: On September 14, council reviewed initial results of a downtown revitalization survey conducted by Strategy Research Institute. Similar to the survey conducted the prior year for the road bond, the downtown survey was conducted to provide specific information on the level of community support for particular policies and actions under consideration. The full set of survey questions, response percentages, and a sample cross tabulation by council ward were attached to a memo for council dated October 1. August 10, 2009: At a workshop, council discussed and categorized desired downtown outcomes after reviewing a summary of the current downtown-related policies, plans, and prior public involvement efforts. Following the workshop, staff compiled councilors’ outcomes into collective statements using the model from the City Council Consensus Workshop Report February 6-7, 2009 prepared by Consensus Associates. July 8, 2009: Council held a follow-up work session on methods to reinforce existing programs and businesses downtown and to create a series of stimulus actions to strengthen the City’s role in community economic development. No formal action was taken; however, council did express interest in talking about desired downtown outcomes prior to resuming discussion on the various tools available for achieving those outcomes. April 13 & May 27, 2009: Council completed an initial review of possible local stimulus actions on April 13. On May 27, council approved actions on three economic development related items: 1) sale of surplus City real estate for identified development projects, 2) initiation of amendments to extend the expiration period for approved land use applications, and 3) consideration of an amendment to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan. [On November 9, council approved extending the life of approved land use applications to help projects that may have stalled during difficult economic conditions. The ordinance provides a one-time, automatic three-year extension for certain land use applications that have already gone through a public process and been approved by the City. Council received a memo on strategies for the sale of surplus property dated December 3.] January 2009: Council unanimously approved a City of Eugene Mayor and City Council Economic Development Statement. PART II – Summary of Public Involvement on Downtown Revitalization & Proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments April 2010: As of April 29, www.vibranteugene.org had 1,247 visitors. April 8, 2010: The Eugene Redevelopment Advisory Committee (ERAC) reviewed the proposed amendments and voted in support of the proposed plan amendments. ERAC also indicated that, given the proposed conclusion of the Downtown District, council should begin a process to identify alternative program(s) and tools to support long-term, desirable downtown improvements such as new housing. March 29, 2010: Planning Commission discussed the proposed amendments and adopted a motion recommending council approval of the amendments based on the Planning Commission’s review of the proposed new boundary and the four new projects contemplated in the Plan with respect to their consistency with the City’s land use policies. The motion does not include consideration of the financial aspects of the plan. (Passed 5:1 Warness opposed). January 2010: Staff held two open house events to share information and gather feedback on the potential projects (January 6 and 7) and gathered additional feedback through an online survey. The LCC project received the most support. The downtown parking improvements project received the least amount of support. On January 28, ERAC considered the projects and supported a priority ranking of LCC, Business Assistance & Housing, VA Clinic, and Safety, as the top four projects. Staff also presented the projects to the Sustainability Commission on January 20 and attended the January 21 Downtown Neighborhood Association meeting to provide an update on council’s progress. November 2009: Vibrant Eugene website and surveys were promoted at First Friday Artwalk with an incentive of Hult Center ticket drawing for survey respondents. The local KVAL news station held a televised town hall on downtown revitalization and safety. December 2010: ERAC met to review proposed downtown projects. The Vibrant Eugene website added an online community discussion board (http://vibranteugene.activeboard.com/index.spark). October 2009: Vibrant Eugene website (www.vibranteugene.org) was launched providing information on downtown revitalization efforts and opportunities, an on-line survey to collect public input and a Downtown Eugene twitter (http://twitter.com/DowntownEugene). ERAC reviewed the downtown revitalization survey results and the proposed downtown strategies of jobs and redevelopment, safety, parking, and arts and amenities. The Planning Commission reviewed the downtown revitalization public involvement plan and survey results. September 2009: A random sample telephone survey on downtown revitalization was conducted in late August and early September. Results from the survey mirrored the council’s desire to focus on specific projects as part of a downtown revitalization plan. Survey results indicated that 86% of respondents support the expansion of LCC’s downtown campus, 85% support a Veteran’s Medical clinic, and 70% of respondents support matching grants to improve local businesses. After hearing a specific list of potential downtown revitalization projects, 70% of respondents supported this form of economic development, and 53% reported supporting subsidies for economic development downtown. Other priorities for downtown revitalization mentioned in the survey included adequate/free parking, greater police presence, and easing regulations/providing incentives for locating businesses downtown. August 24, 2009: The Planning Commission received an update on downtown revitalization and reviewed a summary of downtown related plans. July 2009: City Manager presented at a Downtown Neighborhood Association meeting. Previous Years: The City has done public outreach on the potential redevelopment of downtown including creating the Downtown Vision, Downtown Plan, and the West Broadway Advisory Committee Recommendations. ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈú ORDINANCE NO. _________ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN AMENDED URBAN RENEWAL PLAN FOR THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL DISTRICT. The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: A. The Urban Renewal Plan for the Central Eugene Project (“the Plan”) was initially adopted on July 3, 1968, by Resolution No. 257 of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene (“the Agency”), and on December 19, 1968, by Resolution No. 1609 of the Eugene City Council. The Plan has subsequently been amended, most recently on September 13, 2004, by Ordinance No. 20328 of the Eugene City Council. B. The City Council’s 2009 Vision and Goals include a goal to foster a vibrant downtown. The City Council and the Urban Renewal Agency Board of Directors (“the Agency Board”) have determined that the following projects, using urban renewal as a financing tool, are consistent with that goal and will require an amendment of the Plan: (1) Lane Community College’s (“LCC”) new downtown campus. LCC wants to build a new state-of-the-art education facility on the vacant half-block located at th 10 Avenue and Charnelton Street, across from the downtown Eugene Public Library. The new green (LEED Platinum) education facility will include job training programs, the Energy Management program, business development and senior programs, and other LCC educational programming. LCC is also considering the inclusion of student housing in the project. Up to $8 million of urban renewal funds would be used to help LCC build the new Downtown Campus project. (2) Public safety improvements and increased police staffing. Public safety improvements are a key strategy to creating a vibrant and economically healthy place. Increasing public safety services and coordinating with other agencies will make downtown a more welcoming place for everyone. Downtown public safety, including additional police officers, will be funded from dollars freed up by using up to $4.9 million of urban renewal funds to pay off the debt (excluding interest) on the Broadway Place garages. th (3) Veterans Affairs (VA) Willamette Street Clinic. If the VA chooses the 12 Avenue and Willamette Street site for its new clinic, the facility will provide service to veterans in our community, fill a currently underutilized building, and create a medical sector hub for businesses and jobs downtown. The plan amendment proposes to expand the downtown urban renewal boundary to include the site and to spend up to $2.5 million of urban renewal funds to make improvements near that location. (4) Park Blocks improvements for the Farmers’ Market. Improvements to the Park th Blocks along 8 Avenue to make the location more attractive and functional for the Farmers’ Market will support a cornerstone of downtown activity and one of Ordinance - Page 1 of 3 the most significant public event venues in the city. Up to $500,000 of urban renewal funds would be used for this project. C. In accordance with the provisions of ORS 457, the Agency Director prepared amendments to the Plan (“the proposed Plan”) which included: (1) Increasing the maximum indebtedness by $16.15 million, to a total of $49.15 million, to cover the four specific projects itemized in Finding B above; (2) Expanding the Downtown Urban Renewal District boundary by 7% (five acres) to be able to provide assistance for the VA project; (3) Annual review by a community member panel; and (4) Providing for the termination of the Downtown Urban Renewal District as soon as sufficient funds are collected to pay for those projects. D. On March 8, 2010, the Agency Board considered the proposed Plan and the accompanying Report on Urban Renewal Plan for the Downtown Urban Renewal District (“the Report”) and then forwarded it to the City Council for public hearing and possible adoption. E. On March 12, 2010, the proposed Plan and the Report were forwarded to the governing body of each taxing district affected by the Plan with an offer to consult and confer with that district. F. On March 19, 2010, Notice of the proposed Plan amendment was sent to individuals or households as required by ORS 457.120. The Notice included, but was not limited to, the date, time and place of the public hearing, in addition to the website where the proposed Plan and the Report could be viewed. G. On March 29, 2010, the Planning Commission met to review the proposed Plan and Report, and made recommendations to the City Council. H. On April 8, 2010, the Eugene Redevelopment Advisory Committee met to review the proposed Plan and Report. I. After the Notice was mailed pursuant to ORS 457.120, the City Council conducted a public hearing on April 19, 2010, on the proposed Plan. J. Based on the recommendations of the Agency Board and the Planning Commission, and the written and oral testimony before the Planning Commission and the City Council, the City Council specifically finds and determines that: (1) The area defined in the proposed Plan is blighted for the reasons explained in Exhibit B to this Ordinance; (2) The rehabilitation and redevelopment is necessary to protect the public health, safety or welfare of the municipality; (3) The proposed Plan conforms to the Metropolitan Area General Plan, State Land Use Planning Goals, the Downtown Plan, the adopted Growth Management Policies, the Vision for Greater Downtown Eugene, and other adopted City plans Ordinance - Page 2 of 3 and policies, including the City Council’s 2009 Goals, and provides an outline for accomplishing the urban renewal projects proposed in the Plan; (4) No one will be displaced as a result of any of the four projects included in the proposed Plan; (5) No real property will be acquired as a result of the four projects; (6) Adoption and carrying out of the proposed Plan is economically sound and feasible as described in the Report included in Exhibit A; and (7) The City shall assume and complete any activities prescribed by the proposed Plan. THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1 . Based upon the above findings, the Report on the Urban Renewal Plan accompanying the Plan, and the blight findings attached as Exhibit B, all of which are hereby adopted, the Urban Renewal Plan for the Downtown Urban Renewal District attached as Exhibit A is approved and adopted as the urban renewal plan for the area set forth therein. Section 2. The City Recorder is requested to: (a) Publish a notice of the adoption of the amended Plan, in the Register-Guard, a newspaper published within the City of Eugene and having the greatest circulation within the City, no later than four days following the date that this Ordinance is adopted. In accordance with ORS 457.135, the notice shall contain a statement that the amended Plan shall be conclusively presumed valid for all purposes 90 days after its adoption by this Ordinance and that no direct or collateral attack on the action adopting the amended Plan may be commenced thereafter; (b) Forward a copy of this Ordinance and the amended Plan to the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene, which Agency will cause the amended Plan to be recorded in the official records of Lane County, Oregon; and (c) Forward a copy of this Ordinance and the amended Plan to the Lane County Assessor and request that the Assessor perform the duties directed by ORS 457.430 through ORS 457.450. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this _____ day of _________________, 2010 ____ day of ____________________, 2010 __________________________________ __________________________________ City Recorder Mayor Ordinance - Page 3 of 3 ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈû ìÊÍÌÍÉרìÐÛÎûÙÙÍÏÌÛÎÃÓÎÕê×ÌÍÊÈ Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿² º±®¬¸» ܱ©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬ ß¼±°¬»¼Ö«´§ïçêè Ó±¼·º·»¼ Ü»½»³¾»®ïçêè Ü»½»³¾»®ïçèç Ö«²»ïççè Í»°¬»³¾»®ïíôîððì ÁÁÁÁÁôîðïð Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§±º¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ôÑ®»¹±² ËÎÞßÒÎÛÒÛÉßÔÐÔßÒÚÑÎÌØÛÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒËÎÞßÒÎÛÒÛÉßÔÜ×ÍÌÎ×ÝÌ Ì¿¾´»±ºÝ±²¬»²¬ Í»½¬·±²ïðð¬×²¬®±¼«½¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòî Í»½¬·±²îðð¬Ü»º·²·¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòî Í»½¬·±²íðð¬Ô»¹¿´Ü»½®·°¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòí Í»½¬·±²ìðð¬Ù±¿´¿²¼Ñ¾¶»½¬·ª»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòí ßòÙÑßÔÍòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòí ÞòÑÞÖÛÝÌ×ÊÛÍòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòí Í»½¬·±²ëðð¬Ô¿²¼Ë»Ð´¿²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòì Í»½¬·±²êðð¬Ð®±¶»½¬ß½¬·ª·¬·»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòì ßòÔßÒÛÝÑÓÓËÒ×ÌÇÝÑÔÔÛÙÛÒÛÉÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒÝÛÒÌÛÎòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòì ÞòÞÎÑßÜÉßÇÐÔßÝÛÙßÎßÙÛÍúÐËÞÔ×ÝÍßÚÛÌÇ×ÓÐÎÑÊÛÓÛÒÌÍòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòë ÝòÐßÎÕÞÔÑÝÕÍ×ÓÐÎÑÊÛÓÛÒÌÍÚÑÎÌØÛúÆÜÆÂÅÓßÎÕÛÌòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòë ÜòÊßÝÔ×Ò×Ýòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòë ÛòßÜÓ×Ò×ÍÌÎßÌ×ÊÛßÝÌ×Ê×Ì×ÛÍòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòë ÚòÛÈ×ÍÌ×ÒÙßÝÌ×Ê×Ì×ÛÍòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê Í»½¬·±²éðð¬Ó»¬¸±¼º±®Ú·²¿²½·²¹¬¸»Ð®±¶»½¬òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê Í»½¬·±²èðð¬ß²²«¿´Ú·²¿²½·¿´Í¬¿¬»³»²¬Î»¯«·®»¼òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê Í»½¬·±²çðð¬Ý·¬·¦»²Ð¿®¬·½·°¿¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê Í»½¬·±²ïððð¬Ò±²Ü·½®·³·²¿¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòé Í»½¬·±²ïïðð¬Î»½±®¼·²¹±º¬¸·Ð´¿²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòé Í»½¬·±²ïîðð¬Ð®±½»¼«®»º±®Ý¸¿²¹»±®ß³»²¼³»²¬òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòé Í»½¬·±²ïíðð¬Ü«®¿¬·±²¿²¼Ê¿´·¼·¬§±ºß°°®±ª»¼Ð´¿²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòè ßòÜËÎßÌ×ÑÒÑÚÌØÛÐÔßÒ ............................................................................................................................. - 8 - ÞòÊßÔ×Ü×ÌÇ ...................................................................................................................................................... - 8 - Í»½¬·±²ïìðð¬Ó¿¨·³«³×²¼»¾¬»¼²»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòè ÛÈØ×Þ×ÌßæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿°òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòç ÛÈØ×Þ×ÌÞæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ü»½®·°¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïð ×òßÜÑÐÌ×ÑÒ Î»±´«¬·±² Ü¿¬»Ð«®°±» Ò«³¾»® λ±´«¬·±²íÖ«´êèß¼±°¬·±²±º¬¸»Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²º±®¬¸»Ý»²¬®¿´Û«¹»²»Ð®±¶»½¬ø¬¸» Ò±òîëéд¿²÷ò ××òßÓÛÒÜÓÛÒÌÍ ß³»²¼³»²¬ Ü¿¬»Ð«®°±» Ò«³¾»® λ±´«¬·±²ïçÜ»½êèÓ±¼·º·»¼¬¸»Ð´¿²¬±¿´´±©º±®¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´°®±¶»½¬¿®»¯«·®»¼¾§ØËÜ o Ò±òïêð笱®»½»·ª»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´º»¼»®¿´º«²¼ò Ñ®¼·²¿²½»èÒ±ªèçß´·¹²»¼¬¸»Ð´¿²©·¬¸Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²°±´·½·»æ¬®»²¹¬¸»²¬¸»¿®»¿ù o Ò±òïçêìè°±·¬·±²¿¿®»¹·±²¿´»®ª·½»½»²¬»®ô³¿·²¬¿·²¬¸»Û«¹»²»½»²¬®¿´ ¾«·²»¼·¬®·½¬¿¿ª·¬¿´½»²¬»®ô·²½±®°±®¿¬»°®·²½·°´»±º½±³°¿½¬ «®¾¿²¹®±©¬¸ô»²½±«®¿¹»®»¬¿·´¿²¼½±³³»®½·¿´¼»ª»´±°³»²¬·²¬¸» ¼±©²¬±©²¿®»¿ô¿²¼°®±³±¬»¬¸»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º°¿®µ·²¹¬®«½¬«®» ·²¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²½±®»ò Û¨°·®¿¬·±²»¬º±®ÚÇïðò o Ñ®¼·²¿²½»ïÖ«²çèλ°±²¼»¼¬±Ó»¿«®»ë𬱿÷·²½´«¼»¿³¿¨·³«³¿³±«²¬±º o Ò±òîðïîð·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¿²¼¾÷»´»½¬Ñ°¬·±²ïº±®¬¸»½·¬§©·¼»°»½·¿´´»ª§¿ ¬¸»³»¬¸±¼º±®½±´´»½¬·²¹¿¼ª¿´±®»³°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»º±®°¿§³»²¬±º ¼»¾¬®»´¿¬»¼¬±«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´°®±¶»½¬ò Ô·³·¬»¼»¨°»²¼·¬«®»±º²»©º«²¼¬±½±³°´»¬·²¹»¨·¬·²¹°®±¶»½¬¿²¼ o ½±²¬®«½¬·±²±º¿²»©³¿·²´·¾®¿®§ò λ³±ª»¼¬¸»¾«·²»¿·¬¿²½»´±¿²°®±¹®¿³ò o ß°°®±ª»¼¿°´¿²¬±®»¼«½»¼·¬®·½¬¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²½±¬±ª»®¬¸» o º±´´±©·²¹¬¸®»»§»¿®ò Ñ®¼·²¿²½»ïíÍ»°ðìÛ¨°¿²¼»¼¬¸»°®±¶»½¬º±®©¸·½¸¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼½±«´¼¾»«»¼ o Ò±òîðíîèÝ®»¿¬»¼¿°«¾´·½¿¼ª·±®§½±³³·¬¬»» o ß¼¼»¼¬¸»®»¯«·®»³»²¬º±®°»½·º·½ß¹»²½§¿°°®±ª¿´±º°®±¶»½¬ o ¹®»¿¬»®¬¸¿²üîëðôðððø±¬¸»®¬¸¿²´±¿²÷ô¿²¼¿¼¼·²¹¿´·³·¬±º üïððôðð𱲬¸»³¿²¼¿¬»º±®¿°«¾´·½¸»¿®·²¹·²¬¸»»ª»²¬±º¿°´¿² ½¸¿²¹»ø¿°°´·»¬±³·²±®¿³»²¼³»²¬¬¸¿¬½¿²¾»¿°°®±ª»¼¾§¬¸» ËÎß©·¬¸±«¬ÑÎÍìëéòðçë¿°°®±ª¿´¬Í»½¬·±²ïîððôݱº¬¸»îððì д¿²÷ò ß¼¼»¼¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Î»ª·¬¿´·¦¿¬·±²Ô±¿²Ð®±¹®¿³øÜÎÔÐ÷ò o Û¨°·®¿¬·±²»¬º±®îðîìò o Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 1 - ËÎÞßÒÎÛÒÛÉßÔÐÔßÒÚÑÎÌØÛÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒËÎÞßÒÎÛÒÛÉßÔÜ×ÍÌÎ×ÝÌ Í»½¬·±²ïðð¬×²¬®±¼«½¬·±² ̸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬Ð´¿²øº±®³»®´§µ²±©²¿¬¸»Ý»²¬®¿´Û«¹»²»Ð®±¶»½¬ д¿²÷ô©¿«°¼¿¬»¼·²îðï𺱮¬¸»±´»°«®°±»±ºº«²¼·²¹º±«®²»©°®±¶»½¬æøï÷¿·¬¿²½»¬± ¬¸ Ô¿²»Ý±³³«²·¬§Ý±´´»¹»øÔÝÝ÷º±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±²¬¸»±²¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±² Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Í·¬»åøî÷¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¿·¬¿²½»·²º«²¼·²¹¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»åøí÷ ·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ¬±°®±ª·¼»¾»¬¬»®±°°±®¬«²·¬·»º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬å¿²¼ ¬¸ øì÷¿·¬¿²½»©·¬¸¿Ê»¬»®¿²ßºº¿·®øÊß÷½´·²·½ô·º¬¸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»·»´»½¬»¼¾§ ¬¸»ÊßòÒ±±¬¸»®²»©°®±¶»½¬©·´´¾»º«²¼»¼©·¬¸¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬¼±´´¿®ò˰±²¬¸»®»°¿§³»²¬ ±º¼»¾¬®»´¿¬»¼¬±¬¸»»²»©°®±¶»½¬¿²¼°®»ª·±«´§¿°°®±ª»¼°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿² λ²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬©·´´¾»¬»®³·²¿¬»¼ô¿²§«²«»¼¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼©·´´¾»®»¬«®²»¼¬±Ô¿²» ݱ«²¬®§º±®®»¼·¬®·¾«¬·±²¬±±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ô¿²¼±¬¸»®¿»¬¿²¼´·¿¾·´·¬·» ¬®¿²º»®®»¼¬±¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ò Í»½¬·±²îðð¬Ü»º·²·¬·±² ̸»º±´´±©·²¹¼»º·²·¬·±²©·´´¹±ª»®²¬¸·Ð´¿²ò ¬¸ ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»³»¿²¬¸»ß¹»²½§±©²»¼°®±°»®¬§¾±«²¼»¼¾§Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬±² ¬¸ ¬¸»©»¬ôïðߪ»²«»±²¬¸»±«¬¸ô¿²¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬±²¬¸»»¿¬ò̸»¼±©²¬±©²°«¾´·½´·¾®¿®§ ¬¸ ·¼·®»½¬´§¿½®±ïðߪ»²«»º®±³¬¸··¬»ò îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬³»¿²¬¸»«°¼¿¬»¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²¬¸¿¬©¿½±³°´»¬»¼·²îðïðò ß¹»²½§³»¿²¬¸»Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§±º¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ò Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»³»¿²¬¸»¬®«½¬«®»¼°¿®µ·²¹¿¬Þ®±¿¼©¿§¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²¬®»»¬ò ܱ©²¬±©²Ð´¿²Ì¸»Ð±´·½·»·²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ð´¿²©»®»¿¼±°¬»¼¾§¬¸»Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´·² îððì¿¿®»º·²»³»²¬±º¬¸»Û«¹»²»Í°®·²¹º·»´¼Ó»¬®±°±´·¬¿²ß®»¿Ù»²»®¿´Ð´¿²ò д¿²³»¿²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²ò д¿²ß®»¿³»¿²¬¸»°®±°»®¬§·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬¿³±®»º«´´§ ¼»½®·¾»¼·²Í»½¬·±²íððò ¬¸ Ю±¶»½¬³»¿²øï÷¿·¬¿²½»¬±ÔÝݺ±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±²¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»åøî÷ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¿·¬¿²½»·²º«²¼·²¹¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»åøí÷·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µ Þ´±½µ¬±°®±ª·¼»¾»¬¬»®±°°±®¬«²·¬·»º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬å¿²¼øì÷¿·¬¿²½»®»´¿¬»¼¬±¿ ¬¸ ²»©ÊßÝ´·²·½ô·º¬¸»Êß½¸±±»¬¸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 2 - Ì¿¨×²½®»³»²¬Ú·²¿²½·²¹³»¿²¿³»¬¸±¼±ºº·²¿²½·²¹«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´°®±¶»½¬¿¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§ ÑÎÍݸ¿°¬»®ìëéò Í»½¬·±²íðð¬Ô»¹¿´Ü»½®·°¬·±² ̸»Ü± ©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬·²½´«¼»¬¸¿¬¿®»¿±º¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§é뿽®»ò̸»Ð´¿² ß®»¿·²½´«¼»¿´´±º¬¸»´¿²¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»¾±«²¼¿®·»¼»·¹²¿¬»¼±²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿°¿¬¬¿½¸»¼ ¿Û¨¸·¾·¬ß¿²¼¼»½®·¾»¼¿½±²¬¿·²·²¹¿´´´±¬±®°¿®½»´±º°®±°»®¬§ô·¬«¿¬»¼·²¬¸»Ý·¬§±º Û«¹»²»ôݱ«²¬§±ºÔ¿²»ôͬ¿¬»±ºÑ®»¹±²ô¾±«²¼»¼¹»²»®¿´´§¿¼»½®·¾»¼¿´±·²Û¨¸·¾·¬Þò Í»½¬·±²ìðð¬Ù±¿´¿²¼Ñ¾¶»½¬·ª» ßòÙÑßÔÍ Ì¸»¹±¿´±º¬¸»Ð´¿²¿®»¬±æ ïò׳°®±ª»¬¸»º«²½¬·±²ô½±²¼·¬·±²ô¿²¼¿°°»¿®¿²½»±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¬¸®±«¹¸æ ¬¸ ¿òλ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¬¸»»¨½¿ª¿¬»¼ª¿½¿²¬´±¬¿¬¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»å ¾òÓ¿·²¬»²¿²½»±º½®·¬·½¿´°¿®µ·²¹¿»¬å ½ò׳°®±ª»¼¿º»¬§º±®ª··¬±®¬±´±½¿¬·±²¿²¼¾«·²»©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿å ¼ò׳°®±ª»¼·¬»º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬å¿²¼ »òλ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿²«²¼»®«¬·´·¦»¼³»¼·½¿´½´·²·½º±®«»¾§Ê»¬»®¿²ßºº¿·®ò îòÛ´·³·²¿¬»¾´·¹¸¬¿²¼¾´·¹¸¬·²¹·²º´«»²½»å íòͬ®»²¹¬¸»²¬¸»»½±²±³·½½±²¼·¬·±²±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿å¿²¼ ìòÛ²¸¿²½»£_ª?£_ªÅ®±´»¿¬¸»®»¹·±²¿´»½±²±³·½ô¹±ª»®²³»²¬¿´ô¿²¼½«´¬«®¿´½»²¬»® ¿²¼¿½»²¬®¿´´±½¿¬·±²º±®°«¾´·½¿²¼°®·ª¿¬»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿²¼·²ª»¬³»²¬ò ÞòÑÞÖÛÝÌ×ÊÛÍ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¸¿¾»»²·²¬»²¼»¼¬±·³°´»³»²¬¬¸»¿¼±°¬»¼°±´·½·»½±²¬¿·²»¼ ·²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ð´¿²¿²¼¬±¼»ª»´±°¼±©²¬±©²¿¬¸»¸»¿®¬±º¿´·ª¿¾´»ô«¬¿·²¿¾´»½·¬§ò̸» ±¾¶»½¬·ª»º±®¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼»¼Ð´¿²¿®»¬±»²«®»¬¸¿¬æ ¬¸ ïòÔÝÝ·¿¾´»¬±®»¼»ª»´±°¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»©·¬¸¿¾«·´¼·²¹¬¸¿¬©·´´¾®·²¹ ¬¸±«¿²¼±º°»±°´»·²¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿å îò̸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»®»³¿·²¿ª¿·´¿¾´»¿²¼·²¹±±¼½±²¼·¬·±²¬±«°°±®¬±¬¸»® ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿²¼®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬·²¼±©²¬±©²¿²¼ô¿¬¬¸»¿³»¬·³»ô¬±»²¿¾´» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±°«¾´·½¿º»¬§¼±©²¬±©²å íò̸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬½¿²½±²¬·²«»¬±¾®·²¹¸«²¼®»¼±º»³°´±§»»¿²¼®»·¼»²¬·²¬± ¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿å¿²¼ ìòͱ³»´±½¿´°«¾´·½º«²¼¿®»¿ª¿·´¿¾´»¬±³¿¨·³·¦»¬¸»½¸¿²½»¬¸¿¬¬¸»Êß½¸±±»¬¸» ¬¸ ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 3 - Í»½¬·±²ëðð¬Ô¿²¼Ë»Ð´¿² ̸»«»¿²¼¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿´´´¿²¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¸¿´´½±³°´§©·¬¸¬¸»®»¹«´¿¬·±² °®»½®·¾»¼·²¬¸»Ã?Yޱ³°®»¸»²·ª»°´¿²ô¦±²·²¹±®¼·²¿²½»ô«¾¼·ª··±²±®¼·²¿²½»ôÝ·¬§ ½¸¿®¬»®ô±®¿²§±¬¸»®¿°°´·½¿¾´»´±½¿´ôͬ¿¬»±®Ú»¼»®¿´´¿©®»¹«´¿¬·²¹¬¸»«»±º°®±°»®¬§ ©·¬¸·²¿²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿®»¿ò Í»½¬·±²êðð¬Ð®±¶»½¬ß½¬·ª·¬·» ̱¿½¸·»ª»¬¸»±¾¶»½¬·ª»±º¬¸·Ð´¿²ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§³¿§«²¼»®¬¿µ»¬¸»º±´´±©·²¹¿½¬·ª·¬·»ô¿²¼ ²±±¬¸»®ô©·¬¸¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼æ ßòÔßÒÛÝÑÓÓËÒ×ÌÇÝÑÔÔÛÙÛÒÛÉÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒÝÛÒÌÛΠ̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§°»²¼«°¬±üè³·´´·±²±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼ø²±¬½±«²¬·²¹°¿§³»²¬±º¼»¾¬ ·«¿²½»±®·²¬»®»¬½±¬÷¬±¿·¬ÔÝÝ·²¬¸»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿²»©¼±©²¬±©²¾«·´¼·²¹º±®·¬ ¬¸ °®±¹®¿³ô¿¬¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»ò˰±²¿¹®»»³»²¬¾§ÔÝÝ¿²¼¬¸»Ý·¬§ô¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ³¿§·²½´«¼»¿°«¾´·½°´¿¦¿±®±°»²°¿½»¿®»¿¿¬¬¸»·¬»¿²¼°±¬»²¬·¿´´§¿¼±©²¬±©²°«¾´·½ ¿º»¬§¬¿¬·±²ò ÔÝÝ·°®±°±·²¹¬±¾«·´¼¿²»©èðôðð𯫿®»º±±¬³·¨»¼«»¬¿¬»±º¬¸»¿®¬¼±©²¬±©² »¼«½¿¬·±²º¿½·´·¬§ò̸»»¼«½¿¬·±²¾«·´¼·²¹·¬¿®¹»¬»¼º±®ÔÛÛÜд¿¬·²«³½»®¬·º·½¿¬·±²òÔÝÝ· ¬¸ ¿´±½±²·¼»®·²¹¬¸»½±²¬®«½¬·±²±º¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§îðð¾»¼±º¬«¼»²¬¸±«·²¹±²¬¸»ïðú ݸ¿®²»´¬±²·¬»ò̸»²»©¸·¹¸´§«¬¿·²¿¾´»»¼«½¿¬·±²¾«·´¼·²¹·»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¾»¿¬»¿½¸·²¹ ¬±±´º±®âŲ¿¬·±²¿´´§®»½±¹²·¦»¼Û²»®¹§Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬°®±¹®¿³¿²¼¾»½±³»¿³±¼»´º±® «¬¿·²¿¾´»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò̸»²»©»¼«½¿¬·±²º¿½·´·¬§©·´´»½«®»âŰ®»»²½»¼±©²¬±©²º±® »ª»®¿´¼»½¿¼»¿²¼©·´´¾»¿³¿¶±®¿½¬·ª·¬§¹»²»®¿¬±®º±®¼±©²¬±©²òÛ¨·¬·²¹»¼«½¿¬·±² °®±¹®¿³¿²¼²»©°®±¹®¿³¬±¾»·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»²»©¾«·´¼·²¹©·´´¼®¿©¬¸±«¿²¼±º¬«¼»²¬ ¿²¼ª··¬±®¬±¬¸»º¿½·´·¬§»¿½¸§»¿®òß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô²»©¸±«·²¹®»·¼»²¬©·´´¹»²»®¿¬»³±®» ¿½¬·ª·¬§·²¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²½±®»ò̸·´¿²¼³¿®µ¾«·´¼·²¹ô½±«°´»¼©·¬¸¬¸»¿½¬·ª·¬§¹»²»®¿¬»¼ ¬¸®±«¹¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ô©·´´¾»½±³»¿³¿¶±®¿²½¸±®©¸·½¸©·´´«°°±®¬¿¼¶¿½»²¬®»¬¿·´¿²¼»®ª·½»ô »²¸¿²½»¬¸»°»®½»°¬·±²±º¿º»¬§¾§·²¬®±¼«½·²¹¸·¹¸ª±´«³»±º²»©°»¼»¬®·¿²¬®¿ºº·½ô¿²¼ ¿¬¬®¿½¬²»©·²ª»¬³»²¬·²¬¸»¿®»¿ò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§°®±ª·¼»¿·¬¿²½»©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬®»´¿¬»¼ ½±¬º±®¬¸»²»©»¼«½¿¬·±²º¿½·´·¬§¿²¼¸±«·²¹ô·²½´«¼·²¹½±²¬®«½¬·±²¸¿®¼¿²¼±º¬½±¬ô·¬» ·³°®±ª»³»²¬ô·²º®¿¬®«½¬«®»ô±°»²°¿½»ô¹®»»²¾«·´¼·²¹º»¿¬«®»ô¿®¬¿²¼±¬¸»®°®±¶»½¬ ®»´¿¬»¼½±¬ò ̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§¿½¯«·®»¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹ÔÝÝܱ©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®°®±°»®¬§´±½¿¬»¼¿¬ïðëç É·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬ò̸·¿½¯«··¬·±²©±«´¼º¿½·´·¬¿¬»·¬®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿²¼®»«»ò׺¿½¯«·®»¼ô ¬¸»°®±°»®¬§©±«´¼¾»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼º±®»·¬¸»®°®·ª¿¬»±®°«¾´·½«»°»²¼·²¹º«¬«®»¿½¬·±²¾§ ¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼òÍ«½¸®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±«´¼¾»¿½½±³°´·¸»¼»·¬¸»®¬¸®±«¹¸®»¬»²¬·±²ô ®»¿´»ô±®´»¿»¼»°»²¼·²¹±²¬¸»®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°´¿²º±®¬¸»°®±°»®¬§ò׬·¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼¬¸¿¬ ®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¬¸»°®±°»®¬§©±«´¼¾»¿½½±³°´·¸»¼¾§¬¸»»²¼±ºîðïçò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 4 - ÞòÞÎÑßÜÉßÇÐÔßÝÛÙßÎßÙÛÍúÐËÞÔ×ÝÍßÚÛÌÇ×ÓÐÎÑÊÛÓÛÒÌÍ Ý±²¬®«½¬·±²±º°¿®µ·²¹¹¿®¿¹»¸¿¾»»²¿²¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬§º±®¬¸·°´¿²¿®»¿º±® ³¿²§§»¿®òß±²»±º¬¸±»°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§°®»ª·±«´§°®±ª·¼»¼·²·¬·¿´¿·¬¿²½»º±®¬¸» ½±²¬®«½¬·±²±º¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»ò̸»ß¹»²½§²±©³¿§°»²¼«°¬±üìòç³·´´·±²±º ¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼ø²±¬½±«²¬·²¹°¿§³»²¬±º·²¬»®»¬½±¬º±®¬¸»¼»¾¬÷¬±¿·¬¬¸»Ý·¬§·² ®»°¿§·²¹¬¸»¼»¾¬±²¬¸±»¹¿®¿¹»ô°®±ª·¼»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ý·¬§¿¹®»»¬±¿÷½±²¬·²«»¬±³¿µ»¬¸» ¹¿®¿¹»¿ª¿·´¿¾´»º±®¾«·²»»¿²¼®»·¼»²¬¼±©²¬±©²¿²¼¾÷»²¸¿²½»°«¾´·½¿º»¬§·²¬¸» д¿²ß®»¿ò ̸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»°®±ª·¼»¿²»»²¬·¿´°«¾´·½°¿®µ·²¹º¿½·´·¬§¬±»®ª»¬¸»¾«·²»ô ½«¬±³»®¿²¼®»·¼»²¬°¿®µ·²¹²»»¼·²¬¸»Ü·¬®·½¬ò̸»Ü·¬®·½¬·¿°¿®µ·²¹»¨»³°¬¦±²» ©¸·½¸®»´·»ª»°®±°»®¬§±©²»®º®±³¬¸»®»¯«·®»³»²¬¬±°®±ª·¼»·³¾»¼¼»¼°¿®µ·²¹·²²»©¿²¼ ®»¼»ª»´±°»¼°®±°»®¬·»ò̸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»«°°±®¬½±²¬·²«»¼®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬·²¬¸» Ü·¬®·½¬¾§°®±ª·¼·²¹ª·¬¿´°¿®µ·²¹½¿°¿½·¬§ò ÝòÐßÎÕÞÔÑÝÕÍ×ÓÐÎÑÊÛÓÛÒÌÍÚÑÎÌØÛúÆÜÆÂÅÓßÎÕÛÌ Ì¸»ß¹»²½§³¿§°»²¼«°¬±üëððôðð𱺬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼±²·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µ Þ´±½µ·²±®¼»®¬±³¿µ»¬¸¿¬´±½¿¬·±²³±®»¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª»¿²¼º«²½¬·±²¿´º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬ò ÜòÊßÝÔ×Ò×Ý ¬¸ ׺¬¸»Êß½¸±±»¬¸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»º±®·¬²»©ÊßÝ´·²·½ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§³¿§°»²¼«°¬± üîòë³·´´·±²±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼º±®°«¾´·½·²º®¿¬®«½¬«®»²»¿®¬¸¿¬´±½¿¬·±²º±®°¿®µ·²¹ô ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²·³°®±ª»³»²¬ô±®±¬¸»®·²º®¿¬®«½¬«®»·³°®±ª»³»²¬²»½»¿®§¬±»®ª»¬¸¿¬ ·¬»ò̸»°®±°±»¼Êß½´·²·½©±«´¼°®±ª·¼»¿²¿®®¿§±º·³°±®¬¿²¬³»¼·½¿´«°°±®¬»®ª·½»¬± ¬¸»ª»¬»®¿²½±³³«²·¬§òÔ±½¿¬·²¹¬¸·º¿½·´·¬§©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿©±«´¼½®»¿¬»¿²¿½¬·ª» ½±³³»®½·¿´¸«¾©·¬¸»¨¬»²¼»¼¸±«®±º±°»®¿¬·±²ò̸»·¹²·º·½¿²¬²«³¾»®±º½´·»²¬¬±¹»¬¸»® ©·¬¸¬¸»±²¹±·²¹°®»»²½»±º³»¼·½¿´¿²¼«°°±®¬¬¿ºº©±«´¼½±²¬®·¾«¬»¬±½±³³»®½·¿´ ±°°±®¬«²·¬·»¿²¼¬¸»ª¿´«»±º½±³³»®½·¿´°®±°»®¬§©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ò ÛòßÜÓ×Ò×ÍÌÎßÌ×ÊÛßÝÌ×Ê×Ì×ÛÍ ïò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§®»¬¿·²¬¸»»®ª·½»±º·²¼»°»²¼»²¬°®±º»·±²¿´°»±°´»±® ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²¬±°®±ª·¼»¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»±®¬»½¸²·½¿´»®ª·½»«½¸¿æ ¿òЮ»°¿®¿¬·±²±º³¿®µ»¬ôº»¿·¾·´·¬§ô±®±¬¸»®»½±²±³·½¬«¼·»å ¾òЮ»°¿®¿¬·±²±º¼»·¹²ô¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ô»²¹·²»»®·²¹ô´¿²¼½¿°·²¹¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ô °´¿²²·²¹ô¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô±®±¬¸»®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿´¬«¼·»å ½òЮ±ª··±²±º¿½½±«²¬·²¹±®¿«¼·¬»®ª·½»å¿²¼ ¼òß·¬¿²½»©·¬¸°®»°¿®¿¬·±²±º¬¸»¿²²«¿´º·²¿²½·¿´®»°±®¬®»¯«·®»¼«²¼»® Í»½¬·±²èð𱺬¸·Ð´¿²ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 5 - îò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§¿½¯«·®»ô®»²¬ô±®´»¿»±ºº·½»°¿½»¿²¼±ºº·½»º«®²·¬«®»ô»¯«·°³»²¬ô ¿²¼º¿½·´·¬·»²»½»¿®§º±®·¬¬±½±²¼«½¬·¬¿ºº¿·®·²¬¸»³¿²¿¹»³»²¬¿²¼ ·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²±º¬¸·Ð´¿²ò íò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§·²ª»¬·¬®»»®ª»º«²¼·²·²¬»®»¬¾»¿®·²¹¿½½±«²¬±®»½«®·¬·»ò ³±²»§ô¿½½»°¬¿¼ª¿²½»ô´±¿²ô±®¹®¿²¬º®±³¿²§´»¹¿´ ìò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§¾±®®±© ±«®½»ô·«»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¾±²¼¿²¼®»½»·ª»¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬°®±½»»¼¿°®±ª·¼»¼ º±®·²Í»½¬·±²éð𱺬¸·Ð´¿²ò ëò̸»ß¹»²½§¿´±³¿§½±²¬·²«»¬±±°»®¿¬»¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²®»ª·¬¿´·¦¿¬·±²´±¿² °®±¹®¿³òøß´´¼±´´¿®´±¿²»¼³«¬½±³»º®±³¬¸»´±¿²º«²¼¿²¼²±¬º®±³¬¿¨ ·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»ò÷ ÚòÛÈ×ÍÌ×ÒÙßÝÌ×Ê×Ì×ÛÍ Ì¸»ß¹»²½§³¿§½±³°´»¬»°®±¶»½¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼°®·±®¬±¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬ò Í»½¬·±²éðð¬Ó»¬¸±¼º±®Ú·²¿²½·²¹¬¸»Ð®±¶»½¬ ̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§¾±®®±©³±²»§¿²¼¿½½»°¬¿¼ª¿²½»ô´±¿²ô¹®¿²¬ô¿²¼±¬¸»®´»¹¿´º±®³±º º·²¿²½·¿´¿·¬¿²½»º®±³¬¸»Ú»¼»®¿´¹±ª»®²³»²¬ô¬¸»Í¬¿¬»ôÝ·¬§ôݱ«²¬§ô±®±¬¸»®°«¾´·½¾±¼§ô ±®º®±³¿²§±«®½»ô°«¾´·½±®°®·ª¿¬»ôº±®¬¸»°«®°±»±º«²¼»®¬¿µ·²¹¿²¼½¿®®§·²¹±«¬¬¸» Ю±¶»½¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸·Ð´¿²ò ß¼ª¿´±®»³¬¿¨»ô·º¿²§ô´»ª·»¼¾§¿¬¿¨·²¹¾±¼§«°±²¬¸»¬¿¨¿¾´»®»¿´¿²¼°»®±²¿´°®±°»®¬§ ·¬«¿¬»¼·²¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿®»¿ô¸¿´´¾»¼·ª·¼»¼·²¿½½±®¼©·¬¸¿²¼°«®«¿²¬¬±Í»½¬·±²ï½ô ß®¬·½´»×ȱº¬¸»Ñ®»¹±²Ý±²¬·¬«¬·±²¿²¼ÑÎÍìëéòìî𬸮±«¹¸ìëéòìêðô¿²¼«»¼¾§¬¸» ß¹»²½§º±®¬¸»Ð®±¶»½¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸·Ð´¿²ò ̸»ß¹»²½§¸¿´´¿¼±°¬¿²¼«»¿º·½¿´§»¿®»²¼·²¹Ö«²»í𿽽±«²¬·²¹°»®·±¼òÛ¿½¸§»¿®ô¬¸» ß¹»²½§¸¿´´¼»ª»´±°¿¾«¼¹»¬·²½±²º±®³¿²½»©·¬¸¬¸»°®±ª··±²±ºÑÎÍݸ¿°¬»®îç쿲¼ÑÎÍ ìëéòìêðô©¸·½¸¸¿´´¼»½®·¾»±«®½»±º®»ª»²«»ô°®±°±»¼»¨°»²¼·¬«®»ô¿²¼¿½¬·ª·¬·»ò Í»½¬·±²èðð¬ß²²«¿´Ú·²¿²½·¿´Í¬¿¬»³»²¬Î»¯«·®»¼ ߺ·²¿²½·¿´¬¿¬»³»²¬¸¿´´¾»°®»°¿®»¼¿²¼°®±ª·¼»·²º±®³¿¬·±²·²¿½½±®¼¿²½»©·¬¸ÑÎÍìëéò ̸»¬¿¬»³»²¬¸¿´´¾»º·´»¼©·¬¸¬¸»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´¿²¼²±¬·½»¸¿´´¾»°«¾´·¸»¼·²¿½½±®¼¿²½» ©·¬¸ÑÎÍìëéò Í»½¬·±²çðð¬Ý·¬·¦»²Ð¿®¬·½·°¿¬·±² ̸»¿½¬·ª·¬·»¿²¼°®±¶»½¬¼»º·²»¼·²¬¸·Ð´¿²ô¿²¼¬¸»¿¼±°¬·±²±º¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±¬¸·Ð´¿² ¸¿´´¾»«²¼»®¬¿µ»²©·¬¸¬¸»°¿®¬·½·°¿¬·±²±º½·¬·¦»²ô±©²»®ô¬»²¿²¬¿·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ô¿²¼ ±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²©¸±®»·¼»©·¬¸·²±®©¸±¸¿ª»º·²¿²½·¿´·²¬»®»¬©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¬±¹»¬¸»® Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 6 - ©·¬¸¬¸»°¿®¬·½·°¿¬·±²±º¹»²»®¿´®»·¼»²¬±º¬¸»Ý·¬§ò̸»ß¹»²½§Ü·®»½¬±®¸¿´´½±²ª»²»²±¬ ´»¬¸¿²±²½»»¿½¸§»¿®¿½±³³·¬¬»»±º«½¸°»®±²¬±°®»°¿®»¿®»°±®¬¬±¬¸»Ü·®»½¬±®±²¿÷ ¬¸»¿½¬·ª·¬·»±º¬¸»ß¹»²½§º±®¬¸»°®»ª·±«º·½¿´§»¿®ô¿²¼¾÷©¸»¬¸»®¬¸»ÐªYÅ »¨°»²¼·¬«®»±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬¼±´´¿®©¿´·³·¬»¼¬±¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸·Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸» ¿±½·¿¬»¼¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»½±¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸»Ü·®»½¬±®¸¿´´º±®©¿®¼¬¸¿¬®»°±®¬ ¬±¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼«°±²·¬®»½»·°¬ò Í»½¬·±²ïððð¬Ò±²Ü·½®·³·²¿¬·±² ײ¬¸»°®»°¿®¿¬·±²ô¿¼±°¬·±²ô¿²¼·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²±º¬¸·Ð´¿²²±°«¾´·½±ºº·½·¿´±®°®·ª¿¬»°¿®¬§ ¸¿´´¬¿µ»¿²§¿½¬·±²¬±½¿«»¿²§°»®±²ô¹®±«°ô±®±®¹¿²·¦¿¬·±²¬±¾»¼·½®·³·²¿¬»¼¿¹¿·²¬·² ¿³¿²²»®¬¸¿¬ª·±´¿¬»Í»½¬·±²ìòêïí±º¬¸»Û«¹»²»Ý±¼»ôïçéïò Í»½¬·±²ïïðð¬Î»½±®¼·²¹±º¬¸·Ð´¿² ß½±°§±º¬¸»Ý·¬§£kªÃ±Å±®¼·²¿²½»¿°°®±ª·²¹¬¸·Ð´¿²¸¿´´¾»®»½±®¼»¼©·¬¸¬¸»®»½±®¼·²¹ ±ºº·½»®±ºÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§ò Í»½¬·±²ïîðð¬Ð®±½»¼«®»º±®Ý¸¿²¹»±®ß³»²¼³»²¬ ׬·¬¸»·²¬»²¬±º¬¸·Ð´¿²¬¸¿¬ô»¨½»°¬¿°®±ª·¼»¼·²¬¸»º±´´±©·²¹°¿®¿¹®¿°¸ô²±½¸¿²¹»©·´´ ¾»³¿¼»¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸»°«®°±»±º¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬·¬±¿«¬¸±®·¦»¬¸»Ð®±¶»½¬ô¿²¼ ±²½»¬¸±»°®±¶»½¬¿®»½±³°´»¬»¼¿²¼¬¸»¼»¾¬±²¬¸±»°®±¶»½¬·®»°¿·¼ø±®¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ º«²¼¸¿ª»¾»»²¿½½«³«´¿¬»¼«ºº·½·»²¬¬±°¿§¬¸¿¬¼»¾¬©¸»²¼«»÷ô¬¸¿¬¬¸»¼·ª··±²±º¬¿¨» º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿½»¿»ò ÑÎÍìëéòðèëøî÷ø·÷ô¸±©»ª»®ô®»¯«·®»¬¸¿¬¿²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´°´¿²·²½´«¼»¿¼»½®·°¬·±²±º©¸¿¬ ¬§°»±º°´¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬½±²¬·¬«¬»Âk?ª?ñ«ª«ª?Á©¸·½¸®»¯«·®»¬¸»¿³» ²±¬·½»ô¸»¿®·²¹¿²¼¿°°®±ª¿´°®±½»¼«®»®»¯«·®»¼±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´°´¿²ò̸»¬¿¬«¬»¿´± ·¼»²¬·º·»¬©±¬§°»¬¸¿¬³«¬¾»·²½´«¼»¼¿Âk?ª?ñ«ª«ª?Áø·²½®»¿»·²³¿¨·³«³ ·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¿²¼»¨°¿²·±²±º¬»®®·¬±®§·²»¨½»±ºïû÷ò׬·¬¸»·²¬»²¬±º¬¸·Ð´¿²¬¸¿¬ô©·¬¸ ¬¸»»¨½»°¬·±²´·¬»¼¾»´±©ô¬¸»®»¾»²±¿³»²¼³»²¬ô«¾¬¿²¬·¿´±®±¬¸»®©·»òÍ·²½»¬¸» ¬¿¬«¬»®»¯«·®»¿¼»½®·°¬·±²±º«¾¬¿²¬·¿´¿³»²¼³»²¬ô¬¸»Ð´¿²¼»º·²»¿´´¿³»²¼³»²¬¿ «¾¬¿²¬·¿´¿³»²¼³»²¬ô±¬¸»®¬¸¿²¬¸»º±´´±©·²¹ò ̸»º±´´±©·²¹¿³»²¼³»²¬©·´´¾»¬®»¿¬»¼¿³·²±®¿³»²¼³»²¬ô¿²¼³¿§¾»³¿¼»¾§ ®»±´«¬·±²±º¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼æ ïòß³»²¼³»²¬¬±½±®®»½¬½´»®·½¿´±®·³·´¿®»®®±®å îòß³»²¼³»²¬¬±®»°±²¼¬±¿¼»½··±²¾§¿½±«®¬±®¬¿¬»¿¹»²½§·º±³»±²» ½¸¿´´»²¹»¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬¿²¼¬¸·Ð´¿²·®»³¿²¼»¼ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 7 - Í»½¬·±²ïíðð¬Ü«®¿¬·±²¿²¼Ê¿´·¼·¬§±ºß°°®±ª»¼Ð´¿² ßòÜËÎßÌ×ÑÒÑÚÌØÛÐÔßÒ Ì¿¨»³¿§¼·ª·¼»¼«²¼»®¬¸·Ð´¿²±²´§«²¬·´¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¸¿ ¾»»²·«»¼¿²¼°¿·¼±®¬¸»ß¹»²½§¸¿¼»¬»®³·²»¼¬¸¿¬·¬©·´´²±¬·«»¬¸»º«´´¿³±«²¬±º¬¸¿¬ ³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»ô¿²¼¿´´·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¬¸¿¬©·´´¾»·«»¼¸¿¾»»²·«»¼¿²¼°¿·¼ò ɸ»²¬¸¿¬·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¸¿¾»»²°¿·¼¬¸»ß¹»²½§©·´´²±¬·º§¬¸»¿»±®°«®«¿²¬¬±ÑÎÍ ìëéòìëðøî÷¬±½»¿»¼·ª·¼·²¹¬¿¨»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ô¿²¼¸¿´´®»¬«®²¿²§«²«»¼¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ º«²¼¬±Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬®§º±®®»¼·¬®·¾«¬·±²¬±±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬òر©»ª»®ô¬¸·°´¿²³¿§ ®»³¿·²·²»ºº»½¬«²¬·´¬¸»ß¹»²½§¬®¿²º»®¿²§®»³¿·²·²¹¿»¬¿²¼´·¿¾·´·¬·»±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ ¬±¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»òß±º¬¸»¼¿¬»±º¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬ô·¬·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»´¿¬º·½¿´ §»¿®º±®©¸·½¸¬¿¨»©·´´¾»¼·ª·¼»¼·ÚÇîðïéñîðïèò ÞòÊßÔ×Ü×ÌÇ Í¸±«´¼¿½±«®¬±º½±³°»¬»²¬¶«®·¼·½¬·±²º·²¼¿²§©±®¼ô½´¿«»ô»²¬»²½»ô»½¬·±²ô±®°¿®¬±º¬¸· д¿²¬±¾»·²ª¿´·¼ô¬¸»®»³¿·²·²¹©±®¼ô½´¿«»ô»²¬»²½»ô»½¬·±²ô±®°¿®¬¸¿´´¾»«²¿ºº»½¬»¼ ¾§¿²§«½¸º·²¼·²¹¿²¼¸¿´´®»³¿·²·²º«´´º±®½»¿²¼»ºº»½¬º±®¬¸»¼«®¿¬·±²±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ò Í»½¬·±²ïìðð¬Ó¿¨·³«³×²¼»¾¬»¼²» ̸»«³±ºüííôðððôððð©¿»¬¿¾´·¸»¼·²ïçç迬¸»°»²¼·²¹´·³·¬ø³¿¨·³«³¿³±«²¬±º ²»©·²¼»¾¬»¼²»©¸·½¸½±«´¼¾»·«»¼±®·²½«®®»¼º®±³¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼÷«²¼»®¬¸·Ð´¿² ¿º¬»®Ö«²»ïôïççèò̸¿¬º·¹«®»©¿¼»ª»´±°»¼«·²¹¬¸»»¬·³¿¬»¼°®±¶»½¬½±¬ô°´«¿ëû ¿²²«¿´·²º´¿¬·±²º¿½¬±®ò ̸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬·²½®»¿»¼¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¿³±«²¬¾§üïêòïë³·´´·±²ô¬±¿ ¬±¬¿´±ºüìçòïë³·´´·±²ò̸··¾»´±©¬¸»´·³·¬·³°±»¼«²¼»®ÑÎÍìëéòîî𺱮¬¸»³¿¨·³«³ ·²¼»¾¬»¼²»·²½®»¿»¿´´±©»¼©·¬¸±«¬½±²½«®®»²½»±º¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ô©¸·½¸ ©±«´¼¾»¿¬±¬¿´³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º·¹«®»±ºüêéòé³·´´·±²ô¿±ºÓ¿®½¸îðïðò ̸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»´·³·¬»¬¿¾´·¸»¼¾§¬¸·Í»½¬·±²ïìðð¼±»²±¬¿°°´§¬±±®´·³·¬æ ïò̸»±¾´·¹¿¬·±²±º¬¸»ß¹»²½§¬±°¿§·²¬»®»¬±²·²¼»¾¬»¼²»·«»¼±®·²½«®®»¼«²¼»® ¬¸·Ð´¿²å îòß²§·²¼»¾¬»¼²»·«»¼¬±®»º«²¼·²¼»¾¬»¼²»·«»¼±®·²½«®®»¼«²¼»®¬¸·Ð´¿²ô¬± ¬¸»»¨¬»²¬¬¸¿¬¬¸»®»º«²¼·²¹·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¼±»²±¬»¨½»»¼¬¸»°®·²½·°¿´¿³±«²¬±º ¬¸»®»º«²¼»¼·²¼»¾¬»¼²»ô°´«¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º¬¸»®»º«²¼·²¹·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¬¸¿¬· «»¼¬±°¿§½±¬±º¬¸»®»º«²¼·²¹å íòÚ«²¼¬±®»°¿§·²¼»¾¬»¼²»»¨·¬·²¹±²¬¸»¼¿¬»±º¬¸»ïççèß³»²¼³»²¬å¿²¼ ìòÛ¨°»²¼·¬«®»³¿¼»º®±³º«²¼±¬¸»®¬¸¿²¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼ô«½¸¿´±¿²³¿¼» º®±³¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Î»ª·¬¿´·¦¿¬·±²Ô±¿²Ð®±¹®¿³ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 8 - ÛÈØ×Þ×ÌßæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿° Farmers’ Market Improvements Broadway Place Garages th 10 & Charnelton Site Library Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 9 - ÛÈØ×Þ×ÌÞæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ü»½®·°¬·±² ¬¸ Þ»¹·²²·²¹¿¬¬¸»±«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºïïߪ»²«»¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬·² ¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ôÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§ôÑ®»¹±²ô½±³³»²½·²¹²±®¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§ ´·²»±ºÝ¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»°±·²¬±º·²¬»®»½¬·±²±º¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±º¬¸»¿´´»§ ¬¸ ¾»¬©»»²ïðߪ»²«»¿²¼Þ®±¿¼©¿§å øï÷¬¸»²½»ô©»¬»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±º¿·¼¿´´»§¬±¬¸»©»¬´·²»±º Ô·²½±´²Í¬®»»¬å øî÷¬¸»²½»ô²±®¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÔ·²½±´²Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»°±·²¬±º ¬¸ ·²¬»®»½¬·±²±º¬¸»²±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±º¬¸»¿´´»§¾»¬©»»²Þ®±¿¼©¿§¿²¼è ߪ»²«»·º»¨¬»²¼»¼å øí÷¬¸»²½»ô»¿¬»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»²±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±º¿·¼¿´´»§¬±¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º ©¿§´·²»Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬å øì÷¬¸»²½»ô²±®¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÝ¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸» ¬¸ ߪ»²«»¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬å ²±®¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºé ¬¸ øë÷¬¸»²½»ô»¿¬»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»²±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºéߪ»²«»¬±¬¸»²±®¬¸©»¬ ¬¸ ½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºéߪ»²«»¿²¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬å øê÷¬¸»²½»ô²±®¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÑ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»²±®¬¸©»¬ ¬¸ ½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºêߪ»²«»¿²¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬å ¬¸ øé÷¬¸»²½»ô»¿¬»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»²±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºêߪ»²«»¬±¬¸»²±®¬¸»¿¬ ¬¸ ½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºêߪ»²«»¿²¼Ñ¿µÍ¬®»»¬å øè÷¬¸»²½»ô±«¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»»¿¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÑ¿µÍ¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»²±®¬¸»¿¬ ½±®²»®±ºÑ¿µÍ¬®»»¬¿²¼Í±«¬¸Ð¿®µßª»²«»å øç÷¬¸»²½»ô»¿¬»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»²±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÍ±«¬¸Ð¿®µßª»²«»»¨¬»²¼»¼¬± ¬¸»»¿¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÐ»¿®´Í¬®»»¬å øïð÷̸»²½»ô±«¬¸»®´§¿´±²¹¬¸»»¿¬´·²»±ºÐ»¿®´Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»±«¬¸»¿¬½±®²»®±º¬¸» ¬¸ ·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÐ»¿®´Í¬®»»¬¿²¼É»¬ïïߪ»²«»ô ¬¸ øïï÷̸»²½»É»¬¿´±²¹¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïïߪ»²«»¬±¿°±·²¬¾»·²¹ ¬¸ ïîòð𺻻¬»¿¬»®´§±º¬¸»Í±«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÉ»¬ïïߪ»²«» ¿²¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬å øïî÷̸»²½»±«¬¸»®´§®«²²·²¹ïîòð𺻻¬¼·¬¿²¬¿²¼°¿®¿´´»´¬±¬¸»©»¬»®´§®·¹¸¬±º ©¿§´·²»±ºÉ·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬¬±¿°±·²¬¾»·²¹±²¬¸»»¨¬»²·±²±º¬¸»±«¬¸´·²»±º¿ ¬®¿½¬±º´¿²¼±´¼¾§ÜòÎòݸ®·¬·¿²¿²¼©·º»¬±Ò¿¬¸¿²Ùòݱ´»³¿²¾§¼»»¼®»½±®¼»¼ ·²Þ±±µÞôп¹»ììèôÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ñ®»¹±²Ü»»¼Î»½±®¼å øïí÷¬¸»²½»É»¬ïéçòð𺻻¬¬±¬¸»»¿¬¾±«²¼¿®§±ºÝ«®®·»ß¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û«¹»²»Ñ®»¹±² ¿°´¿¬¬»¼¿²¼®»½±®¼»¼·²Þ±±µîôп¹»éïôÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ñ®»¹±²Ð´¿¬Î»½±®¼å øïì÷¬¸»²½»Í±«¬¸¿´±²¹¿·¼»¿¬¾±«²¼¿®§¬±¿°±·²¬¾»·²¹±°°±·¬»±º¬¸»Í±«¬¸»¿¬ ½±®²»®±ºÔ±¬í±º¿·¼Ý«®®·»ß¼¼·¬·±² øïë÷¬¸»²½»É»¬¬±¬¸»Í±«¬¸»¿¬½±®²»®±º¿·¼Ô±¬í±ºÝ«®®·»ß¼¼·¬·±²å øïê÷¬¸»²½»É»¬êðòð𺻻¬¿´±²¹¬¸»±«¬¸´·²»±º¿·¼Ô±¬íå ¬¸ øïé÷¬¸»²½»Í±«¬¸¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïíߪ»²«»å Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 10 - øïè÷¬¸»²½»É»¬¿´±²¹¿·¼®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸»¿¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±² ¬¸ ±ºÑ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼É»¬ïíͬ®»»¬å øïç÷¬¸»²½»Ò±®¬¸¿´±²¹¬¸»Û¿¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±º¿·¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬¬±¿°±·²¬¾»·²¹±² ¬¸»»¨¬»²·±²±º¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïߪ»²«»å øîð÷¬¸»²½»É»¬¿´±²¹¬¸»»¨¬»²·±²±º¬¸»®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïߪ»²«»¬± ¬¸ ¬¸»Í±«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÉ»¬ïîߪ»²«»¿²¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬å øîï÷¬¸»²½»Í±«¬¸¿´±²¹¬¸»©»¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÑ´·ª»¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸©»¬ ¬¸ ½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÑ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼É»¬ïíߪ»²«»å ¬¸ øîî÷¬¸»²½»É»¬¿´±²¹¬¸»Ò±®¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïíߪ»²«»¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸»¿¬ ¬¸ ½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÉ»¬ïíߪ»²«»¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬å øîí÷¬¸»²½»Ò±®¬¸¿´±²¹¬¸»Û¿¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÝ¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»Í±«¬¸©»¬ ½±®²»®±º´±¬êôÞ´±½µî±º×®¿Ø¿©´»§ß¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§¿°´¿¬¬»¼¿²¼ ®»½±®¼»¼·²Þ±±µÙôп¹»ëïîÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ñ®»¹±²Ð´¿¬Î»½±®¼å øîì÷¬¸»²½»Û¿¬¿´±²¹¬¸»±«¬¸´·²»±º¿·¼Ô±¬ê¬±¬¸»Í±«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±ºÔ±¬ëôÞ´±½µ ¬¸»×®¿Ø¿©´»§ß¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§å øîë÷̸»²½»Ò±®¬¸¿´±²¹¬¸»É»¬´·²»±ºÔ±¬ëô쿲¼ï·²Þ´±½µî±º×®¿Ø¿©´»§ ß¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§¬±°±·²¬ïîòð𺻻¬²±®¬¸±º¬¸»Ò±®¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±ºÔ±¬ï ±º×®¿Ø¿©´»§ß¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§å øîê÷̸»²½»Û¿¬°¿®¿´´»´¬±¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïîߪ»²«»¬±¬¸»Û¿¬ ®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÑ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬å øîé÷̸»²½»²±®¬¸¿´±²¹¬¸»»¿¬®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÑ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸©»¬ ½±®²»®±ºÔ±¬éôÞ´±½µß±ºÜ±®®·ß¼¼·¬·±²¿°´¿¬¬»¼¿²¼®»½±®¼»¼·²Þ±±µÎôп¹» íïìÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ñ®»¹±²Ð´¿¬Î»½±®¼å øîè÷̸»²½»Û¿¬¿´±²¹¬¸»²±®¬¸´·²»±º¿·¼Ô±¬é¬±¿°±·²¬¾»·²¹éòð𺻻¬»¿¬±º¬¸» ͱ«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±ºÔ±¬ïôÞ´±½µß±º¿·¼Ü±®®·ß¼¼·¬·±²å øîç÷̸»²½»Ò±®¬¸¬±¬¸»Ò±®¬¸´·²»±º¿·¼Ô±¬ïôÞ´±½µß±ºÜ±®®·ß¼¼·¬·±²å øíð÷̸»²½»Û¿¬¬±¬¸»É»¬»®´§®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬å øíï÷̸»²½»Ò±®¬¸¿´±²¹¿·¼©»¬»®´§®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬¬±¬¸» ¬¸ ͱ«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÉ·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼É»¬ïïߪ»²«»ò ¬¸ øíî÷̸»²½»É»¬¿´±²¹¬¸»±«¬¸®·¹¸¬±º©¿§´·²»±ºÉ»¬ïïߪ»²«»¬±¬¸» ¬¸ ±«¬¸©»¬½±®²»®±º¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÉ»¬ïïߪ»²«»¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²¬®»»¬ ¿´±¾»·²¹¬¸»°±·²¬±º¾»¹·²²·²¹¿²¼¬¸»®»»²¼·²¹ò Ю±°±»¼Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ð´¿²¬Ó¿®½¸îðïð - 11 - ÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒËÎÞßÒÎÛÒÛÉßÔ Ü×ÍÌÎ×ÝÌÎÛÐÑÎÌ Ú±®¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬Ð´¿² Ñ®·¹·²¿´´§ß¼±°¬»¼Ö«´§íôïçêè¾§Û«¹»²»Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òîëé ß³»²¼»¼Ü»½»³¾»®ïçôïçêè¾§Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òïêðç ß³»²¼»¼Ò±ª»³¾»®èôïçèç¾§Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òïçêìè ß³»²¼»¼Ö«²»ïôïççè¾§Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òîðïîð ß³»²¼»¼Í»°¬»³¾»®ïíôîððì¾§Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òîðíîè ß³»²¼»¼ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁôîðïð¾§Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´Ñ®¼·²¿²½»Ò±òÁÁÁÁÁ Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²» ßÝÕÒÑÉÔÛÜÙÛÓÛÒÌÍ Û«¹»²»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´¿²¼Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼ Ó¿§±®Õ·¬¬§Ð·»®½§ ß´¿²Æ»´»²µ¿ôЮ»·¼»²¬ Ó·µ»Ý´¿®µôÊ·½»Ð®»·¼»²¬ Ù»±®¹»Þ®±©² ß²¼®»¿Ñ®¬·¦ Ù»±®¹»Ð±´·²¹ ݸ®·Ð®§±® Ö»²²·º»®Í±´±³±² Þ»¬¬§Ì¿§´±® Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»Í¬¿ºº Ö±²Î«·¦ôÝ·¬§Ó¿²¿¹»® Í«¿²Ó«·®ôÜ·®»½¬±®±ºÐ´¿²²·²¹¿²¼Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ Ù´»²²Õ´»·²ôÝ·¬§ß¬¬±®²»§ Ü»²²§Þ®¿«¼ Í«»Ý«¬±¹»±®¹» λ¾»µ¿¸Ü±¸®³¿² Ò¿²Ô¿«®»²½» ß³¿²¼¿Ò±¾»´Ú´¿²²»®§ Ó·µ»Í«´´·ª¿² η½¸·»É»·²³¿² Í¿®¿¸Æ¿´»µ· ÌßÞÔÛÑÚÝÑÒÌÛÒÌÍ Ý¸¿°¬»®ïæ×²¬®±¼«½¬·±² ......................................................................................................... 1 ݸ¿°¬»®îæÜ»½®·°¬·±²±ºÐ¸§·½¿´ôͱ½·¿´ôÛ½±²±³·½ô¿²¼Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´Ý±²¼·¬·±²·² ¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ ....................................................................................................... 2 ݸ¿°¬»®íæÛ¨°»½¬»¼×³°¿½¬ôײ½´«¼·²¹Ú·½¿´×³°¿½¬ô±º¬¸»Ð´¿²·²Ô·¹¸¬±ºß¼¼»¼ Í»®ª·½»±®×²½®»¿»¼Ð±°«´¿¬·±² ........................................................................... 5 ݸ¿°¬»®ìæÎ»¿±²º±®Í»´»½¬·±²±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ ................................................................... 6 ݸ¿°¬»®ëæÎ»´¿¬·±²¸·°Þ»¬©»»²Û¨·¬·²¹Ý±²¼·¬·±²¿²¼Û¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬ß½¬·ª·¬§ ˲¼»®¬¿µ»²·²¬¸»Ð´¿² ......................................................................................... 7 ݸ¿°¬»®êæÛ¬·³¿¬»¼Ì±¬¿´Ý±¬±ºÛ¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬±®ß½¬·ª·¬§ôͱ«®½»±ºÓ±²»§ô¿²¼ ß²¬·½·°¿¬»¼Ý±³°´»¬·±²Ü¿¬»º±®Û¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬±®ß½¬·ª·¬§ ......................................... 9 ݸ¿°¬»®éæÛ¬·³¿¬»¼ß³±«²¬±ºÓ±²»§¿²¼ß²¬·½·°¿¬»¼Ç»¿®·²É¸·½¸×²¼»¾¬»¼²» ©·´´¾»Î»¬·®»¼±®Ñ¬¸»®©·»Ð®±ª·¼»¼Ú±®Ë²¼»®ÑÎÍìëéòìîð¬±ìëéòìêð ............... 12 ݸ¿°¬»®èæÚ·²¿²½·¿´ß²¿´§·±º¬¸»Ð´¿²©·¬¸Í«ºº·½·»²¬×²º±®³¿¬·±²¬±Ü»¬»®³·²» Ú»¿·¾·´·¬§ .......................................................................................................... 14 ݸ¿°¬»®çæÚ·½¿´×³°¿½¬Í¬¿¬»³»²¬¬¸¿¬Û¬·³¿¬»¬¸»×³°¿½¬±º¬¸»Ì¿¨×²½®»³»²¬ Ú·²¿²½·²¹ôÞ±¬¸Ë²¬·´¿²¼ßº¬»®¬¸»×²¼»¾¬»¼²»·Î»°¿·¼ô˰±²ß´´ Û²¬·¬·»Ô»ª§·²¹Ì¿¨»Ë°±²Ð®±°»®¬§·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ ........................................... 15 ݸ¿°¬»®ïðæÎ»´±½¿¬·±²Î»°±®¬ ............................................................................................... 18 ݸ¿°¬»®ïïæß°°»²¼·¨ ........................................................................................................... 19 Û¨¸·¾·¬ßæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÞæÆ±²·²¹Ü·¬®·½¬Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÝæÝ»²«Þ±«²¼¿®·»Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÜæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿°©·¬¸îðïðÛ¨°¿²·±²ß®»¿Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬»¼ Û¨¸·¾·¬ÛæÐ®±¶»½¬»¼Î»ª»²«»¿²¼Û¨°»²¼·¬«®»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ Û¨¸·¾·¬Úæ×³°¿½¬±ºË®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´±²¿²×²¼·ª·¼«¿´Ì¿¨Þ·´´ Û¨¸·¾·¬Ùæ×³°¿½¬±º¬¸»Ð´¿²±²Ñª»®´¿°°·²¹Ì¿¨·²¹Ö«®·¼·½¬·±² ×ÒÜÛÈÑÚÌßÞÔÛÍ Ð¿¹» Ì¿¾´»ïÙ»²»®¿´·¦»¼Ô¿²¼Ë»úß½®»î Ì¿¾´»îƱ²·²¹úß½®»î Ì¿¾´»íر«»¸±´¼Ó»¼·¿²×²½±³»í Ì¿¾´»ìß»»¼Ê¿´«»±º¬¸»Ú®±¦»²Þ¿»ì Ì¿¾´»ëÔ·¬±ºÐ®±¶»½¬ß½¬·ª·¬·»¿²¼Û¬·³¿¬»¼Ý±¬ïï Ì¿¾´»êЮ±¶»½¬»¼Î»ª»²«»¿²¼Û¨°»²¼·¬«®»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿îí Ì¿¾´»é׳°¿½¬±ºË®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´±²¿²×²¼·ª·¼«¿´Ì¿¨Þ·´´îì Ì¿¾´»è׳°¿½¬±²Ñª»®´¿°°·²¹Ì¿¨·²¹Ö«®·¼·½¬·±²îë ÎÛÐÑÎÌÑÒÌØÛÜÑÉÒÌÑÉÒËÎÞßÒ ÎÛÒÛÉßÔÜ×ÍÌÎ×ÝÌÐÔßÒ Ý¸¿°¬»®ïæ×²¬®±¼«½¬·±² ̸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬Ð´¿²ø¬¸»ÂɱªÁ¡³¿µ»¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹½¸¿²¹»¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²æ Ͱ»½·º·»º±«®°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»¬±¾»«²¼»®¬¿µ»²·²¬¸»Ð´¿²¿²¼®»³±ª»´¿²¹«¿¹»¬¸¿¬ ¿´´±©»¼º±®º´»¨·¾·´·¬§·²°®±¶»½¬»´»½¬·±²å Í»¬¿²·²½®»¿»·²¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¬±¿´´±©º±®¬¸±»°»½·º·½°®±¶»½¬å Û¨°¿²¼¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬¾±«²¼¿®§¬±¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¬¸»ÊßÝ´·²·½°®±¶»½¬å¿²¼ »½¬¿¬·±²¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬©·´´¾»¬»®³·²¿¬»¼¿º¬»® Í»¬¬¸»»¨° ®»°¿§³»²¬±º¿´´¼»¾¬·«»¼¬±º«²¼¬¸»´·³·¬»¼»¬±º°®±¶»½¬ò ̸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»¸¿°®»°¿®»¼¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ô±®·¹·²¿´´§¿¼±°¬»¼±²Ö«´§ïçêè ¿²¼³±¼·º·»¼Ü»½»³¾»®ïçêèôÜ»½»³¾»®ïçèçôÖ«²»ïççèô¿²¼Í»°¬»³¾»®îððìòÝ·¬§Ý±«²½·´ ½±²·¼»®»¼¼±©²¬±©²±ª»®¬¸»½±«®»±ºîððç©·¬¸¬¸»¼»·®»¬±º±¬»®¿ª·¾®¿²¬¼±©²¬±©² ©¸·´»¿´±°®±ª·¼·²¹²»¿®¬»®³»½±²±³·½¬·³«´«òÝ·¬§Ý±«²½·´¼·½«»¼¼»·®»¼¼±©²¬±©² ±«¬½±³»ô»´»½¬»¼º±«®µ»§¬®¿¬»¹·»ô¿²¼ô«´¬·³¿¬»´§ô»´»½¬»¼°»½·º·½°®±¶»½¬ò̸·Î»°±®¬ ¿½½±³°¿²·»¬¸»Ð´¿²¿²¼½±²·¬±º¬»¨¬ô¬¿¾´»ô¿²¼¿°°»²¼·½»ò ̸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬¿®»¿½±²¬¿·²¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§é뿽®»ø¬¸»Âɱª?Á¡È ̸»´»¹¿´¼»½®·°¬·±²º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿··²Í»½¬·±²íð𱺬¸»Ð´¿²¿²¼·º«®¬¸»®¼»½®·¾»¼±² ¹®¿°¸·½»¨¸·¾·¬·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»Ð´¿²¿²¼·²¬¸»¿°°»²¼·¨¬±¬¸·Î»°±®¬ò 1 ݸ¿°¬»®îæÜ»½®·°¬·±²±ºÐ¸§·½¿´ôͱ½·¿´ôÛ½±²±³·½ô¿²¼ Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´Ý±²¼·¬·±²·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ Ò±¬»æÌ¸·¼»½®·°¬·±²¿²¼¿»³»²¬·±²´§½«®®»²¬¬±¬¸»·¼»²¬·º·»¼¼¿¬»ò ßòи§·½¿´Ý±²¼·¬·±² ïòÔ¿²¼ß®»¿ ̸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿»²½±³°¿»¿¾±«¬é뿽®»ô¿º¬»®¬¸»ë¿½®»¾±«²¼¿®§»¨°¿²·±² ·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬òøÍ»»ß°°»²¼·¨ôÛ¨¸·¾·¬ßº±®¿³¿°±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ò÷ ̸»¬±¬¿´·²½±®°±®¿¬»¼´¿²¼¿®»¿º±®¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ô±ºÓ¿®½¸îðïðô·îèôðëêò̸» д¿²ß®»¿®»°®»»²¬¿¾±«¬ðòîé°»®½»²¬±º¬¸»Ã?YŬ±¬¿´´¿²¼¿®»¿ò̸·¿®»¿ ½±³¾·²»¼©·¬¸¬¸»Î·ª»®º®±²¬Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬±º¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ïé追®»ô»¯«¿´ îëí¿½®»·²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬ô©¸·½¸·´»¬¸¿²±²»°»®½»²¬±º¬¸»Ã?YŬ±¬¿´´¿²¼¿®»¿ò ̸·±²»°»®½»²¬·©»´´¾»´±©¬¸»ïë°»®½»²¬³¿¨·³«³¿´´±©»¼¾§Ñ®»¹±²Í¬¿¬»´¿©ò îòÛ¨·¬·²¹Ô¿²¼Ë»¿²¼Æ±²·²¹ Ì¿¾´»ï¾»´±©¸±©¹»²»®¿´·¦»¼´¿²¼«»¿±ºÓ¿®½¸îðïð¾§½¿¬»¹±®§òÌ¿¾´»î¸±© ¬¸»¦±²·²¹¿±ºÓ¿®½¸îðï𾧦±²·²¹¼·¬®·½¬òß¼»½®·°¬·±²±º»¿½¸«»°»®³·¬¬»¼· º±«²¼·²¬¸»Ý·¬§Ô¿²¼Ë»Ý±¼»òøÌ¸»¦±²·²¹³¿°·´±½¿¬»¼·²¬¸»ß°°»²¼·¨ôÛ¨¸·¾·¬Þò÷ Ì¿¾´»ïÌ¿¾´»î Ù»²»®¿´·¦»¼Ô¿²¼Ë»úß½®»Æ±²·²¹úß½®» Ô¿²¼Ë»Ü»·¹²¿¬·±²ß½®»Æ±²·²¹Ü»·¹²¿¬·±²Æ±²·²¹ß½®» ß´´»§ôÉ¿´µ©¿§ôÞ·µ»°¿¬¸îòè ݱ³³«²·¬§Ý±³³»®½·¿´Ýî ðòé ݱ³³«²·½¿¬·±²ðòé Ø·¬±®·½ÍØ ðòï Û¼«½¿¬·±²¿´ðòè Ó¿¶±®Ý±³³»®½·¿´Ýí ìíòç Ù»²»®¿´Í»®ª·½»ïíòç Ы¾´·½Ô¿²¼ÐÔ îòí Ù±ª»®²³»²¬ëòð Ò±²Æ±²»¼ ײ¼«¬®·¿´ðòî îèòð Ы¾´·½Î·¹¸¬±ºÉ¿§ п®µïòî ̱¬¿´ éëòð λ½®»¿¬·±²êòî Data: March 2010 λ´·¹·±«ôݸ¿®·¬¿¾´»ðòï λ·¼»²¬·¿´ôÓ«´¬·º¿³·´§ëòç λ¬¿·´Ì®¿¼»ïèòë α¿¼îêòï Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Î»´¿¬»¼ïòè Ê¿½¿²¬ðòç ̱¬¿´èìòí Data: March 2010 (Total does not equal Downtown Urban Renewal District acreage of 75 due to rounding and vertical land use designation, i.e. parking below residential.) 2 íòÍ¿²·¬¿®§Í»©»®Í§¬»³ ̸»¿²·¬¿®§»©»®§¬»³©¿«°¹®¿¼»¼¿°¿®¬±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´®»²»©¿´°®±¶»½¬ò̸· «°¹®¿¼·²¹½±²·¬»¼±º®»´·²·²¹¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹´·²»©·¬¸°´¿¬·½°·°»´·²»®òÛ¿½¸¾«·´¼·²¹ ©¿®»½±²²»½¬»¼¿¬¬¸¿¬¬·³»ò̸»»²¹·²»»®·²¹¿²¿´§·¸±©»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹ ½¿°¿½·¬§©¿«ºº·½·»²¬ò ìòÉ¿¬»®Ü»´·ª»®§Í§¬»³ ß½½±®¼·²¹¬±¬¸»Û«¹»²»É¿¬»®¿²¼Û´»½¬®·½Þ±¿®¼ô¬¸»©¿¬»®¼»´·ª»®§§¬»³ ¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬··²«ºº·½·»²¬½±²¼·¬·±²¿²¼ ±º«ºº·½·»²¬½¿°¿½·¬§¬±«°°±®¬¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ò ëòͬ»¿³Ë¬·´·¬§Í§¬»³ Ü«»¬±¸·¹¸§¬»³´±»¬¸®±«¹¸¿²¿¹·²¹·²º®¿¬®«½¬«®»ô°®·½»º´«½¬«¿¬·±²º±®º«»´ô ¿²¼¿²»®±¼·²¹½«¬±³»®¾¿»ô¾«·´¼·²¹¬¸¿¬«»¬»¿³º±®¸»¿¬·²¹º¿½»¿²«²º¿ª±®¿¾´» »½±²±³·½»²ª·®±²³»²¬ò̸»Û«¹»²»É¿¬»®úÛ´»½¬®·½Þ±¿®¼°´¿²¬±¼»½±³³··±²¬¸» ¬»¿³«¬·´·¬§ô©¸·½¸»®ª»¿´³±¬é𽫬±³»®·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ô¾§Ö«²»îðïîò ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´´§ô¬¸»½±¬±º¬»¿³±°»®¿¬·±²·²½®»¿»º±®¬¸»®»³¿·²·²¹½«¬±³»®¿»¿½¸ ¾«·´¼·²¹´»¿ª»¬¸»§¬»³ò êòͬ®»»¬ôß´´»§ôÍ·¼»©¿´µô»¬½ò Ó¿¶±®°±®¬·±²±º¬¸»¬®»»¬ô¿´´»§¿²¼·¼»©¿´µ©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿©»®»«°¹®¿¼»¼ ¿°¿®¬±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´®»²»©¿´°®±¶»½¬¿²¼®»³¿·²·²¹±±¼½±²¼·¬·±²ò Þòͱ½·¿´Ý±²¼·¬·±² ïòر«·²¹ Ý»²«îðð𼿬¿®»°±®¬¬¸¿¬¬¸»®»¿®»îé踱«·²¹«²·¬·²Ý»²«Þ´±½µ¬¸¿¬½±ª»® ¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿òײ¿îððìд¿²²·²¹¿²¼Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬¿²¿´§·ô¬¸®»»³¿¶±® ¸±«·²¹¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°®±ª·¼»¿¬±¬¿´±ºïç긱«·²¹«²·¬©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿òÝ»²« îðð𼿬¿®»°±®¬¬¸¿¬¸±«·²¹·²¬¸»¿®»¿·°®»¼±³·²¿²¬´§®»²¬¿´ô©·¬¸±ª»®ççû±º ¸±«·²¹®»²¬»®±½½«°·»¼ò îòͱ½·±Û½±²±³·½ ß±ºÝ»²«îðððôííï°»±°´»©»®»´·ª·²¹·²Ý»²«Þ´±½µ¬¸¿¬½±ª»®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿òײ ¿²¼«®®±«²¼·²¹¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ô¬¸»³»¼·¿²·²½±³»©¿«¾¬¿²¬·¿´´§´±©»®¬¸¿²¬¸»Ý·¬§ ³»¼·¿²·²½±³»òÍ»»Ì¿¾´»í¾»´±©òÍ»»ß°°»²¼·¨Û¨¸·¾·¬Ýº±®¿³¿°±º½»²« ¾±«²¼¿®·»ò Ì¿¾´»í¬Ø±«»¸±´¼Ó»¼·¿²×²½±³» Ý·¬§üíëôèëð üîíôëéïüïëôðéê Ý»²«Ì®¿½¬íçðð Þ´±½µÙ®±«°ïÞ´±½µÙ®±«°î Ü¿¬¿æÝ»²«îðððôÜÐïôÍÚíôÌ¿¾´»Ðëíå 3 íòÛ³°´±§³»²¬ ײ߰®·´îððèô¬¸»®»©»®»îç绳°´±§»®©·¬¸ìôéçﻳ°´±§»»·²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿² λ²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬ò̸»´¿®¹»¬»³°´±§»®·²¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬©»®»Ð®±º»·±²¿´ôͽ·»²¬·º·½ô¿²¼ Ì»½¸²·½¿´Í»®ª·½»øïèòìû÷ôØ»¿´¬¸Ý¿®»¿²¼Í±½·¿´ß·¬¿²½»øïëòèû÷ôÙ±ª»®²³»²¬ øïîòêû÷ô¿²¼ß½½±³³±¼¿¬·±²¿²¼Ú±±¼Í»®ª·½»øïîòíû÷ øÜ¿¬¿æÔ¿²»Ý±«²½·´±ºÙ±ª»®²³»²¬ô Ñ®»¹±²Û³°´±§³»²¬Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬îððèÏ«¿®¬»®´§Ý»²«±ºÛ³°´±§³»²¬¿²¼É¿¹»øÏÝÛÉ÷÷ò ÝòÛ½±²±³·½Ý±²¼·¬·±² ïòÊ¿´«»±ºÐ®±°»®¬§ ̸»ÚÇîððçñîðï𬿨¿¾´»¿»»¼ª¿´«»º±®¬¸»»²¬·®»Ý·¬§·üïïôêííôðîìôèëîò̸» ¬±¬¿´¿»»¼ª¿´«»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿±ºÚÇîððçñîðïð·üïëìôçèðôðíêò̸»¬¿¾´» ¾»´±©¼»³±²¬®¿¬»¬¸¿¬¬¸»º®±¦»²¾¿»º±®¬¸»½±³¾·²»¼«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬· ©»´´©·¬¸·²¬¸»ïëû´·³·¬·³°±»¼¾§ÑÎÍìëéò Ì¿¾´»ì¬ß»»¼Ê¿´«»±º¬¸»Ú®±¦»²Þ¿» ܱ©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î·ª»®º®±²¬Ë®¾¿²Ì±¬¿´¿¿û ̱¬¿´ λ²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬±ºÝ·¬§ßÊ Ú®±¦»²Þ¿»üíïôíèêôççïüëðôêðçôììèüèïôççêôìíçðòéû ߺ¬»®»¨°¿²·±²±º¬¸»¾±«²¼¿®§º±®¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ô¬¸»º®±¦»²¾¿»©·´´·²½®»¿»¾§ ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§üïì³·´´·±²ô¾®·²¹·²¹¬¸»¬±¬¿´º®±¦»²¾¿»º±®¿´´¼·¬®·½¬¬±ðòèû±º ¿»»¼ª¿´«»·²¬¸»Ý·¬§ò îòλ´¿¬·±²¸·°±º¬¸»Ê¿´«»±º×³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ê¿´«»±ºÔ¿²¼ ̸»½«®®»²¬®¿¬·±±º·³°®±ª»³»²¬ª¿´«»¬±´¿²¼ª¿´«»©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ô¾¿»¼±² îððç¿»³»²¬®»½±®¼¿²¼»¨½´«¼·²¹¿´´¬¿¨»¨»³°¬°®±°»®¬§ô·íòí¬±ïò̸» ¿½½»°¬»¼·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±´¿²¼ª¿´«»®¿¬·±±º¸»¿´¬¸§ôª·¿¾´»ô¿²¼°®±°»®±«¿®»¿·² Ñ®»¹±²½·¬·»¿®»ë¬±ï¿²¼¹®»¿¬»®ò ÜòÛ²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´Ý±²¼·¬·±² Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´½±²¼·¬·±²©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿®»²±¬»¨°»½¬»¼¬±½¸¿²¹»ò̸»¿®»¿¸¿¾»»² ¿²»¬¿¾´·¸»¼½±³³»®½·¿´¾«·²»¿®»¿º±®³¿²§§»¿®òÓ±¬¬®»»¬ô·¼»©¿´µô¿´´»§ô¿²¼ »©»®¿®»·²°´¿½»¿²¼©·´´¾»«°¹®¿¼»¼¿²¼³¿·²¬¿·²»¼ò̸»°«¾´·½°¿®µ¿®»¿©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿² ß®»¿©·´´¾»«°¹®¿¼»¼¿²¼³¿·²¬¿·²»¼¿²»»¼»¼ò 4 ݸ¿°¬»®íæÛ¨°»½¬»¼×³°¿½¬ôײ½´«¼·²¹Ú·½¿´×³°¿½¬ô±º¬¸»Ð´¿²·²Ô·¹¸¬±º ß¼¼»¼Í»®ª·½»±®×²½®»¿»¼Ð±°«´¿¬·±² ̸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬¿´´±©º±®º±«®°»½·º·½°®±¶»½¬ø¼»½®·¾»¼·²³±®»¼»¬¿·´·²Ý¸¿°¬»®ë÷ ¬¸¿¬©·´´·³°®±ª»¬¸»º«²½¬·±²ô½±²¼·¬·±²ô¿²¼¿°°»¿®¿²½»±º¬¸»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿®»¿¬¸®±«¹¸æ λ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿²»¨½¿ª¿¬»¼ª¿½¿²¬´±¬·²¬±¿²»©Ô¿²»Ý±³³«²·¬§Ý±´´»¹» ܱ©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®å Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»±º½®·¬·½¿´°¿®µ·²¹¿»¬å ׳°®±ª»¼¿º»¬§º±®ª··¬±®¬±´±½¿¬·±²¿²¼¾«·²»©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿å ׳°®±ª»¼·¬»º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬å¿²¼ λ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿²«²¼»®«¬·´·¦»¼³»¼·½¿´½´·²·½º±®«»¾§Ê»¬»®¿²ßºº¿·®ò ̸»»º±«®°®±¶»½¬¿´±«°°±®¬¬¸»Ð´¿²¹±¿´¬±¬®»²¹¬¸»²¬¸»»½±²±³·½½±²¼·¬·±²±º¬¸» д¿²ß®»¿òѲ»³»¿«®»±º¬¸·¹±¿´·¬¸»»¨°»½¬»¼·²½®»¿»·²¬¸»¬¿¨¿¾´»°®±°»®¬§ª¿´«» ½¿«»¼¾§¬¸»°®±¶»½¬òß®»¿¿¼¶¿½»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿®»¿´±»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¾»½±³»³±®» ª·¿¾´»òÚ®±³ÚÇîðïðñîðïטּ®±«¹¸¬¸»»¬·³¿¬»¼®»³¿·²·²¹´·º»±º¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬øÚÇîðïèñîðïç÷ô °®±°»®¬§ª¿´«»·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿®»»¬·³¿¬»¼¬±·²½®»¿»¾§¿¾±«¬üìë³·´´·±²ò̸»°®±¶»½¬ ©·´´¿´±½±²¬®·¾«¬»¬±¬¸»¹±¿´±º»²¸¿²½·²¹£_ª?£_ªÅ®±´»¿¬¸»®»¹·±²¿´»½±²±³·½ô ¹±ª»®²³»²¬¿´ô¿²¼½«´¬«®¿´½»²¬»®¿²¼½»²¬®¿´´±½¿¬·±²º±®°«¾´·½¿²¼°®·ª¿¬»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿²¼ ·²ª»¬³»²¬ò ̸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬°®±¶»½¬¿®»²±¬»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¸¿ª»¿·¹²·º·½¿²¬·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»Û«¹»²»ì¶ ͽ¸±±´Ü·¬®·½¬ò̸»¦±²·²¹½®·¬»®·¿±ºÝ¼Ýí¼±²±¬»²½±«®¿¹»®»·¼»²¬·¿´¸±«·²¹ò ¬¸ ر©»ª»®ô¬¸»ÔÝݲ»©¼±©²¬±©²½»²¬»®°®±¶»½¬±²¬¸»ïðúݸ¿®²»´¬±²Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Í·¬» ³¿§·²½´«¼»¸±«·²¹òÓ±¬´·µ»´§¬¸»¸±«·²¹©±«´¼¾»º±®½±´´»¹»¿¹»¼¬«¼»²¬±®¿¼«´¬ò כּ¨°»®·»²½»¿´±¸±©®»·¼»²¬·¿´½±³°´»¨»¼»ª»´±°»¼¿®±«²¼¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¸¿ª» º±½«»¼±²¿¼«´¬¸±«·²¹òÞ¿»¼±²âŰ®»´·³·²¿®§°´¿²¿²¼¬¸»°®·±®»¨°»®·»²½»ô¬¸»²»© ¼±©²¬±©²½»²¬»®¸±«´¼¸¿ª»²±±®³·²·³¿´·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»Û«¹»²»ì¶Í½¸±±´Ü·¬®·½¬ò̸» ¿¼¼»¼¿¼«´¬°±°«´¿¬·±²½®»¿¬»¼¾§¬¸·¸±«·²¹°®±¶»½¬³¿§·³°¿½¬ÔÝÝô°¿®¬·½«´¿®´§¬¸» ܱ©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®ô¿²¼¬¸»Ë²·ª»®·¬§±ºÑ®»¹±²©·¬¸·²½®»¿»¼®»¹·¬®¿¬·±²ò̸»±¬¸»®°®±¶»½¬ ·²¬¸»Ð´¿²¿®»²±¬»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¸¿ª»¿²§·¹²·º·½¿²¬·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»Û«¹»²»ì¶Í½¸±±´Ü·¬®·½¬ò ß´´º±«®±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ô´·µ»¿´´¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°®±¶»½¬ô¿®»»¨°»½¬»¼¬±·³°¿½¬°±´·½»»®ª·½»ô ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ô«¬·´·¬·»ô¿²¼±¬¸»®°«¾´·½»®ª·½»òЮ±¶»½¬©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿©»®»½¸±»² º±®¬¸»©¿§·²©¸·½¸¬¸»§«°°±®¬®»½»²¬Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´¬®¿¬»¹·»º±®¼±©²¬±©²¿²¼°´¿²²·²¹ »ºº±®¬º±®¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²¿®»¿ô«½¸¿¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ð´¿²ò̸»»°´¿²²·²¹¼±½«³»²¬©»®» ¾¿»¼±²¿«³°¬·±²¿¾±«¬¬¸»»¨°»½¬»¼²»»¼º±®²»©¿²¼·³°®±ª»¼»®ª·½»¼«»¬± °±°«´¿¬·±²¹®±©¬¸¿²¼±¬¸»®º¿½¬±®ò̸»Ð´¿²·»¨°»½¬»¼¬±º¿½·´·¬¿¬»·³°®±ª»³»²¬©·¬¸·² ¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ô¬¸»®»¾§·³°´»³»²¬·²¹¬¸»¹±¿´±º¬¸»°´¿²²·²¹¼±½«³»²¬ò̸»®»º±®»ô¬¸» °®±¶»½¬«²¼»®¬¸»Ð´¿²¼±²±¬®»«´¬·²¿²·²¬»²·º·½¿¬·±²±º¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¾»§±²¼¬¸¿¬ °®»ª·±«´§¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼«²¼»®¬¸»°´¿²²·²¹¼±½«³»²¬ò 5 ̸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬º±´´±©¬¸»°¿¿¹»±ºÞ¿´´±¬Ó»¿«®»ë𿲼·¬·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²®«´»ò ײ¬¸»Ó»¿«®»ë𻲪·®±²³»²¬ô¬¿¨·²¹¾±¼·»Âø£?УÁ®»ª»²«»°®±¼«½»¼¾§¬¸»¹®±©¬¸·² ª¿´«»±ª»®¿Ð´¿²?ź®±¦»²¾¿»ò̸»Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§©·´´«»¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ ®»ª»²«»¬±½¿®®§±«¬¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸»«»±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»©·´´¿ºº»½¬¬¸»°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨ ®»ª»²«»¿²¼¾±²¼»¼¼»¾¬¬¿¨®¿¬»±º±¬¸»®¬¿¨·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²¬¸¿¬¸¿®»¿»»¼ª¿´«»©·¬¸ kЪÅË®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§ò̸»°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨·³°¿½¬¿®»¼»½®·¾»¼·²Ý¸¿°¬»®çò ݸ¿°¬»®ìæÎ»¿±²º±®Í»´»½¬·±²±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ ̸»±®·¹·²¿´Ð´¿²ß®»¿©¿¿¼±°¬»¼·²ïçêè©·¬¸¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§é𿽮»ò̸·¿®»¿©¿ »´»½¬»¼¿º¬»®½±³°®»¸»²·ª»½±³³«²·¬§°®±½»«²¼»®¬¸»¹«·¼¿²½»±º¬¸»Ú»¼»®¿´ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬±ºØ±«·²¹¿²¼Ë®¾¿²Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬øØËÜ÷òײîðïðô¬¸»ËÎßÞ±¿®¼°®±°±»¼¿² »¨°¿²·±²¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¾§ë¿½®»¬±·²½´«¼»¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´ÊßÝ´·²·½¿®»¿òøÍ»»Û¨¸·¾·¬Üº±® ¿³¿°±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿©·¬¸¬¸»»¨°¿²·±²¿®»¿¸·¹¸´·¹¸¬»¼ò÷Ì©±±º¬¸»º±«®¹±¿´±º¬¸»Ð´¿² ¿®»ï÷·³°®±ª·²¹¬¸»º«²½¬·±²ô½±²¼·¬·±²ô¿²¼¿°°»¿®¿²½»±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿²¼î÷®»¼«½·²¹ ¾´·¹¸¬¿²¼¾´·¹¸¬·²¹·²º´«»²½»ò ß½½±®¼·²¹¬±ÑÎÍìëéòðïðôþ¾´·¹¸¬»¼¿®»¿þ³»¿²¿®»¿¬¸¿¬ô¾§®»¿±²±º¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²ôº¿«´¬§ °´¿²²·²¹ô·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»±®·³°®±°»®º¿½·´·¬·»ô¼»´»¬»®·±«´¿²¼«»±®¬¸»»¨·¬»²½»±º«²¿º» ¬®«½¬«®»ô±®¿²§½±³¾·²¿¬·±²±º¬¸»»º¿½¬±®ô¿®»¼»¬®·³»²¬¿´¬±¬¸»¿º»¬§ô¸»¿´¬¸±®©»´º¿®» ±º¬¸»½±³³«²·¬§òß¾´·¹¸¬»¼¿®»¿·½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¦»¼¾§¬¸»»¨·¬»²½»±º±²»±®³±®»±º¬¸» º±´´±©·²¹½±²¼·¬·±²æ ø¿÷̸»»¨·¬»²½»±º¾«·´¼·²¹¿²¼¬®«½¬«®»ô«»¼±®·²¬»²¼»¼¬±¾»«»¼º±®´·ª·²¹ô½±³ ³»®½·¿´ô·²¼«¬®·¿´±®±¬¸»®°«®°±»ô±®¿²§½±³¾·²¿¬·±²±º¬¸±»«»ô¬¸¿¬¿®»«²º·¬±® «²¿º»¬±±½½«°§º±®¬¸±»°«®°±»¾»½¿«»±º¿²§±²»±®¿½±³¾·²¿¬·±²±º¬¸»º±´´±©·²¹ ½±²¼·¬·±²æ øß÷Ü»º»½¬·ª»¼»·¹²¿²¼¯«¿´·¬§±º°¸§·½¿´½±²¬®«½¬·±²å øÞ÷Ú¿«´¬§·²¬»®·±®¿®®¿²¹»³»²¬¿²¼»¨¬»®·±®°¿½·²¹å øÝ÷Ѫ»®½®±©¼·²¹¿²¼¿¸·¹¸¼»²·¬§±º°±°«´¿¬·±²å øÜ÷ײ¿¼»¯«¿¬»°®±ª··±²º±®ª»²¬·´¿¬·±²ô´·¹¸¬ô¿²·¬¿¬·±²ô±°»²°¿½»¿²¼®»½®»¿¬·±² º¿½·´·¬·»å±® øÛ÷Ѿ±´»½»²½»ô¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²ô¼·´¿°·¼¿¬·±²ô³·¨»¼½¸¿®¿½¬»®±®¸·º¬·²¹±º«»å ø¾÷ß²»½±²±³·½¼·´±½¿¬·±²ô¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²±®¼·«»±º°®±°»®¬§®»«´¬·²¹º®±³º¿«´¬§°´¿²²·²¹å ø½÷̸»¼·ª··±²±®«¾¼·ª··±²¿²¼¿´»±º°®±°»®¬§±®´±¬±º·®®»¹«´¿®º±®³¿²¼¸¿°»¿²¼ ·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»·¦»±®¼·³»²·±²º±®°®±°»®¬§«»º«´²»¿²¼¼»ª»´±°³»²¬å ø¼÷̸»´¿§·²¹±«¬±º°®±°»®¬§±®´±¬·²¼·®»¹¿®¼±º½±²¬±«®ô¼®¿·²¿¹»¿²¼±¬¸»®°¸§·½¿´ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¬·½±º¬¸»¬»®®¿·²¿²¼«®®±«²¼·²¹½±²¼·¬·±²å ø»÷̸»»¨·¬»²½»±º·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»¬®»»¬¿²¼±¬¸»®®·¹¸¬±º©¿§ô±°»²°¿½»¿²¼«¬·´·¬·»å 6 øº÷̸»»¨·¬»²½»±º°®±°»®¬§±®´±¬±®±¬¸»®¿®»¿¬¸¿¬¿®»«¾¶»½¬¬±·²«²¼¿¬·±²¾§©¿¬»®å ø¹÷ß°®»ª¿´»²½»±º¼»°®»½·¿¬»¼ª¿´«»ô·³°¿·®»¼·²ª»¬³»²¬¿²¼±½·¿´¿²¼»½±²±³·½ ³¿´¿¼¶«¬³»²¬¬±«½¸¿²»¨¬»²¬¬¸¿¬¬¸»½¿°¿½·¬§¬±°¿§¬¿¨»·®»¼«½»¼¿²¼¬¿¨®»½»·°¬ ¿®»·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»º±®¬¸»½±¬±º°«¾´·½»®ª·½»®»²¼»®»¼å ø¸÷ß¹®±©·²¹±®¬±¬¿´´¿½µ±º°®±°»®«¬·´·¦¿¬·±²±º¿®»¿ô®»«´¬·²¹·²¿¬¿¹²¿²¬¿²¼«²°®± ¼«½¬·ª»½±²¼·¬·±²±º´¿²¼°±¬»²¬·¿´´§«»º«´¿²¼ª¿´«¿¾´»º±®½±²¬®·¾«¬·²¹¬±¬¸»°«¾´·½ ¸»¿´¬¸ô¿º»¬§¿²¼©»´º¿®»å±® ø·÷ß´±±º°±°«´¿¬·±²¿²¼®»¼«½¬·±²±º°®±°»®«¬·´·¦¿¬·±²±º¬¸»¿®»¿ô®»«´¬·²¹·²·¬º«®¬¸»® ¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²¿²¼¿¼¼»¼½±¬¬±¬¸»¬¿¨°¿§»®º±®¬¸»½®»¿¬·±²±º²»©°«¾´·½º¿½·´·¬·»¿²¼ »®ª·½»»´»©¸»®»ò ݸ¿°¬»®ëæÎ»´¿¬·±²¸·°Þ»¬©»»²Û¨·¬·²¹Ý±²¼·¬·±²¿²¼Û¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬ ß½¬·ª·¬§Ë²¼»®¬¿µ»²·²¬¸»Ð´¿² ß´´°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»»¬º±®¬¸·²Í»½¬·±²êð𱺬¸»Ð´¿²¿®»·²¬»²¼»¼¬±½±®®»½¬¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹ ¼»º·½·»²½·»·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿¿¼»½®·¾»¼·²¬¸·®»°±®¬øÍ»»Ý¸¿°¬»®î÷ò ̸»°®±°±»¼îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»¿®»æ ¬¸ ï÷ß·¬¿²½»¬±ÔÝݺ±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±²¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Í·¬»å î÷ß¼¼·¬·±²¿´¿·¬¿²½»·²º«²¼·²¹¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»å í÷׳°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ¬±°®±ª·¼»¾»¬¬»®±°°±®¬«²·¬·»º±®¬¸»ú?«?Å Ó¿®µ»¬å¿²¼ ¬¸ ì÷ß·¬·²¹©·¬¸¿Êß½´·²·½ô·º¬¸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»·»´»½¬»¼¾§¬¸»Êßò ¬¸ ï÷ÔÝÝÒ»©Ü±©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®æ ̸»ß¹»²½§±©²¬¸»ï𿲼ݸ¿®²»´¬±²Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Í·¬» ¬¸ ¾±«²¼»¼¾§Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬±²¬¸»©»¬ôïðߪ»²«»±²¬¸»±«¬¸ô¿²¼Ñ´·ª»Í¬®»»¬±² ¬¸»»¿¬ò̸»·¬»··¹²·º·½¿²¬´§«²¼»®«¬·´·¦»¼·²·¬°®»»²¬½±²º·¹«®¿¬·±²¬¿¯«¿®¬»®¾´±½µ ±º«®º¿½»°¿®µ·²¹¿²¼¿¯«¿®¬»®¾´±½µ®»³²¿²¬º®±³¼»³±´·¬·±²±º¬¸»º±®³»®Í»¿® ¼»°¿®¬³»²¬¬±®»ò ÔÝÝ¿°°®±¿½¸»¼¬¸»ß¹»²½§®»¹¿®¼·²¹¿½¯«··¬·±²±º¬¸»°®±°»®¬§º±®¿²»©¼±©²¬±©² º¿½·´·¬§òѲֿ²«¿®§îëôîðïðô¬¸»ËÎßÞ±¿®¼°®±ª·¼»¼¼·®»½¬·±²¬±»²¬»®·²¬±¿²»¨½´«·ª» ²»¹±¬·¿¬·±²©·¬¸ÔÝÝô²»¹±¬·¿¬»¿°«®½¸¿»¿²¼¿´»¿¹®»»³»²¬ô¿²¼®»¬«®²¬±¬¸»ËÎß Þ±¿®¼º±®º·²¿´¿°°®±ª¿´±º¬¸»¬»®³òÔÝݸ¿°®±ª·¼»¼»¼«½¿¬·±²¿´»®ª·½»º®±³ ¼±©²¬±©²º±®±ª»®í𧻿®¿¬ïðëçÉ·´´¿³»¬¬»Í¬®»»¬ò̸»½«®®»²¬º¿½·´·¬§²±´±²¹»®³»»¬ ¬¸»²»»¼±º¬¸»½±´´»¹»ô¿²¼ÔÝÝ·²¬»²¼¬±¾«·´¼¿²¼±©²¿²»©ô³·¨»¼«»¾«·´¼·²¹º®±³ ©¸·½¸¬±±ºº»®»¼«½¿¬·±²¿´¿²¼±¬¸»®»®ª·½»·²¼±©²¬±©²Û«¹»²»ò̸»»¨¬»²·ª»¸±«®±º ±°»®¿¬·±²©·´´½®»¿¬»¾±¬¸¼¿§¬·³»¿²¼»ª»²·²¹¿½¬·ª·¬§¿¬¿µ»§·²¬»®»½¬·±²±º¼±©²¬±©²ò Û½±²±³·½±°°±®¬«²·¬·»º±®½«®®»²¬¿²¼º«¬«®»¼±©²¬±©²¾«·²»»©·´´¾»½®»¿¬»¼¿ ¬«¼»²¬ô»³°´±§»»ô¿²¼ª··¬±®«°°±®¬®»¬¿«®¿²¬ô®»¬¿·´ô»®ª·½»¿²¼½«´¬«®¿´ª»²«»ò ײ¿¼¼·¬·±²¬±Û²»®¹§Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬ôÞ«·²»Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ô½±²¬·²«·²¹»¼«½¿¬·±²ô¿²¼¿ ª¿®·»¬§±º±¬¸»®½´¿»ô¬¸»³«´¬·«»º¿½·´·¬§©·´´·²½´«¼»°¿½»º±®¬»²¿²¬¿²¼±¬¸»® 7 ½±³³«²·¬§«»ô°±·¾´§¿°«¾´·½¿º»¬§¬¿¬·±²ò̸»®»·¿´±¿°±·¾·´·¬§¬¸¿¬¬«¼»²¬ ¸±«·²¹½±«´¼¾»·²½±®°±®¿¬»¼¿°¿®¬±º¬¸»®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°´¿²ò ¬¸ ̸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ð«¾´·½Ô·¾®¿®§ô·³³»¼·¿¬»´§¿½®±ïðߪ»²«»ô·¿½±³³«²·¬§¿»¬¬¸¿¬ ©·´´¾»²»º·¬¹®»¿¬´§º®±³¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±²¬¸»ß¹»²½§±©²»¼·¬»ô»°»½·¿´´§¬¸» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°®±°±»¼¾§ÔÝÝò̸»ß¹»²½§·²ª»¬»¼·¹²·º·½¿²¬´§·²¬¸»Ô·¾®¿®§ò̸» ܱ©²¬±©²Û«¹»²»Ð«¾´·½Ô·¾®¿®§°®±¶»½¬©¿¾«·´¬¿²¼»¯«·°°»¼º±®¶«¬±ª»®üíê³·´´·±²ò ß¾±«¬¸¿´º±º¬¸¿¬¿³±«²¬½¿³»º®±³Ý·¬§¼»¾¬±¾´·¹¿¬·±²¬¸¿¬©»®»·«»¼·²îðð𠬸®±«¹¸¿°¿®¬²»®¸·°©·¬¸¬¸»Û«¹»²»Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ß¹»²½§øËÎß÷ò̸»°¿§³»²¬±²¬¸» ¼»¾¬±º¿¾±«¬üîòë³·´´·±²°»®§»¿®½¿³»º®±³¬¸»ËÎßòÞ»¹·²²·²¹·²ïççíô¬¸»ËÎß °«®½¸¿»¼¬¸»´¿²¼±²©¸·½¸¬¸»´·¾®¿®§©¿¾«·´¬º±®üèéëôðððò̸»Ý·¬§¾±®®±©»¼üïèòë ³·´´·±²©¸·½¸©¿¬±¾»®»°¿·¼º®±³¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬¼±´´¿®º®±³¬¸»ËÎßò̸»ËÎß¿´± ½±²¬®·¾«¬»¼¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´½¿¸¬±¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ô©·¬¸¿¬±¬¿´±º¿¾±«¬üîë³·´´·±²±º¬¸»üíê ³·´´·±²°®±¶»½¬½±³·²¹º®±³ËÎßô®»°®»»²¬·²¹²»¿®´§éð°»®½»²¬±º¬¸»½¿°·¬¿´½±¬º±®¬¸» ²»©Ô·¾®¿®§ò̸»®»³¿·²·²¹íð°»®½»²¬½¿³»º®±³¿½±³¾·²¿¬·±²±º±«®½»ô·²½´«¼·²¹üë ³·´´·±²®¿·»¼¾§¬¸»Û«¹»²»Ð«¾´·½Ô·¾®¿®§ú£kª?ãªÅÝ¿°·¬¿´Ý¿³°¿·¹²ô¿´»±º¿»¬ô ¿²¼°®±½»»¼º®±³¿´±½¿´±°¬·±²°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨´»ª§±ºüïòç³·´´·±²ò î÷Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»æ ̸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿·°¿®µ·²¹»¨»³°¬ô©¸·½¸³»¿²¬¸¿¬°®±°»®¬§ ±©²»®¿®»²±¬®»¯«·®»¼¬±°®±ª·¼»°¿®µ·²¹òÇ»¬°¿®µ·²¹¿ª¿·´¿¾·´·¬§·½®·¬·½¿´¬±¬¸» »½±²±³·½«½½»±º¼±©²¬±©²òß«½¸ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§¸¿°¿®¬·½·°¿¬»¼·²»ª»®¿´°®±¶»½¬¬± °®±ª·¼»¬®«½¬«®»¼°¿®µ·²¹±°°±®¬«²·¬·»©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿òѲ»«½¸°®±¶»½¬©¿¬¸» Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»òݱ²¬·²«»¼°®±ª··±²±ºÞ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»°¿®µ·²¹©·´´«°°±®¬âÅ Ò»©Ü±©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®°®±¶»½¬¿²¼±¬¸»®®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿´±²¹É»¬Þ®±¿¼©¿§ô«½¸¿ Ô±®¼â?ôŰ®±°»®¬§òÙ·ª»²Ý·¬§¾«¼¹»¬¿®§·«»ô½±²¬·²«»¼±°»®¿¬·±²¿²¼¬¿¾·´·¬§±º ¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»©·´´¾»»²¸¿²½»¼¾§¬¸»ß¹»²½§¿«³·²¹¬¸»¼»¾¬®»°¿§³»²¬ ±²¬¸»¹¿®¿¹»ò׬©±«´¼¿´±³¿µ»·¬°±·¾´»º±®¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹º«²¼¬±°®±ª·¼»º·²¿²½·¿´ «°°±®¬º±®·²½®»¿»¼¿º»¬§»®ª·½»ò Þ¿½µ¹®±«²¼æ ̸»ß¹»²½§¿»³¾´»¼¬¸»¬©±¸¿´º¾´±½µ¬¸¿¬©»®»«»¼¬±¼»ª»´±°¬¸» Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»³·¨»¼«»°®±¶»½¬òß¹»²½§º«²¼·²¬¸»¿³±«²¬±ºüîòê³·´´·±²©»®» ½±²¬®·¾«¬»¼¬±¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¬®«½¬«®»½±²¬®«½¬·±²½±¬ò̸»Ý·¬§±´¼¼»ª»´±°³»²¬®·¹¸¬ º±®¸±«·²¹¬±¾»½±²¬®«½¬»¼±²¬±°±º¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¬®«½¬«®»ò̸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»³·¨»¼ «»°®±¶»½¬·²½´«¼»ïéð¿°¿®¬³»²¬«²·¬ô¹®±«²¼º´±±®½±³³»®½·¿´°¿½»ô¿²¼éì𠬮«½¬«®»¼°¿®µ·²¹°¿½»ò׬·¿³¿¶±®¿²½¸±®º±®¬¸»©»¬»²¼±º¼±©²¬±©²¿²¼¿ °±°«´¿®®»·¼»²¬·¿´¼»¬·²¿¬·±²©·¬¸ª»®§´±©ª¿½¿²½§®¿¬»òߪ¿·´¿¾·´·¬§±º°¿®µ·²¹©¿¿ ½±²¬®·¾«¬·²¹º¿½¬±®¬±Û²¬»®°®·»Î»²¬ßÝ¿®´±½¿¬·²¹¼±©²¬±©²¿²¼»³°´±§·²¹íðð°»±°´»ò í÷п®µÞ´±½µ×³°®±ª»³»²¬º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬æ ̸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬ ±°»®¿¬»³«´¬·°´»¬·³»°»®©»»µ¼«®·²¹¬¸»°®·²¹ô«³³»®ô¿²¼º¿´´±²¿°±®¬·±²±º¬¸» п®µÞ´±½µòß´¬¸±«¹¸¬¸»ß¹»²½§¸¿½±³°´»¬»¼»ª»®¿´·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µô ¬¸»Ú¿®³»®ÅÓ¿®µ»¬½±²¬·²«»¬±»²½±«²¬»®·«»©·¬¸¬¸»°¿½»ô«½¸¿¿½½»¬± »´»½¬®·½·¬§¿²¼´»ª»´¿²¼°¿ª»¼«®º¿½»ò׳°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ¿²¼»¨°¿²·±²±º ¿ª¿·´¿¾´»°¿½»©·´´«°°±®¬¿½±®²»®¬±²»±º¼±©²¬±©²¿½¬·ª·¬§¿²¼±²»±º¬¸»³±¬ 8 ·¹²·º·½¿²¬°«¾´·½»ª»²¬ª»²«»·²¬¸»½·¬§ò̸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ¿®»¬¸»¸·¬±®·½½»²¬»®¿²¼³±¬ ·¼»²¬·º·¿¾´»°«¾´·½°¿½»·²¼±©²¬±©²òÚ±®¬¸»°¿¬º»©§»¿®ô¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬¸¿ »¨°®»»¼¿²»»¼¿²¼¼»·®»¬±»¨°¿²¼·¬±ºº»®·²¹¬±³¿·²¬¿·²º·²¿²½·¿´ª·¿¾·´·¬§¿²¼ °±¬»²¬·¿´´§±°»®¿¬»§»¿®®±«²¼ò̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´·³°®±ª»¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ·²±®¼»®¬±³¿µ» ¬¸¿¬´±½¿¬·±²³±®»¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª»¿²¼º«²½¬·±²¿´º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬ò ¬¸ ì÷ÊßÝ´·²·½æ ̸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»·½«®®»²¬´§±©²»¼¾§Ð»¿½»Ø»¿´¬¸òر©»ª»®ô¬¸» ³¿¶±®·¬§±º¬¸»¾«·´¼·²¹·²±©ª¿½¿²¬ò̸»®»º±®»ôл¿½»Ø»¿´¬¸¸¿»¨°®»»¼¿²·²¬»®»¬·² »½«®·²¹¿¬»²¿²¬º±®¬¸··¬»ò̸»Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬±ºÊ»¬»®¿²ßºº¿·®øÊß÷·½«®®»²¬´§»»µ·²¹ ¿«·¬¿¾´»·¬»©¸»®»·¬½¿²´±½¿¬»¿²»¨°¿²¼»¼½´·²·½ò̸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿³¿§¾»·¼»¿´º±®¬¸»Êß ½´·²·½¾»½¿«»±º¬¸»½»²¬®¿´´±½¿¬·±²¿²¼°®±¨·³·¬§¬±Ô¿²»Ì®¿²·¬Ã??Ã?ÅÛ«¹»²»Í¬¿¬·±² ¿²¼¬¸»Ù®»§¸±«²¼Í¬¿¬·±²ò̸»¾«·´¼·²¹·´¿®¹»»²±«¹¸¬±¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¬¸»·¦»¼»·®»¼ ¾§¬¸»Êßø¿²»¬·³¿¬»¼ïïðôðððïîðôðð𯫿®»º»»¬÷ò̸»·¬»¿´±¸¿¿¼»¯«¿¬»±²·¬» °¿®µ·²¹ò л¿½»Ø»¿´¬¸¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¬¸¿¬¬¸»Åλ¯«»¬º±®Ð®±°±¿´¬±»´»½¬¿²»©·¬»ô±²½» ·«»¼ô©·´´º¿ª±®¿¾«·´¼·²¹©·¬¸³±¼»®²§¬»³¿²¼«¬¿·²¿¾´»º»¿¬«®»ò̸» л¿½»Ø»¿´¬¸½´·²·½·½«®®»²¬´§½±³°®·»¼±º¿¾«·´¼·²¹¬¸¿¬©¿½±²¬®«½¬»¼·²¬¸»3+24ÅË 3+/4Å¿²¼3+.4ÅÈÍ«¾¬¿²¬·¿´®»¸¿¾·´·¬¿¬·±²·²»»¼»¼¬±«°¼¿¬»¬¸»¾«·´¼·²¹¿²¼¬± °±¬»²¬·¿´´§³¿µ»·¬ÔÛÛܽ»®¬·º·»¼òß²»©ØÊßݧ¬»³©±«´¼®»°´¿½»¬¸»ÛÉÛÞ«°°´·»¼ ¬»¿³§¬»³¿²¼²»©»²»®¹§»ºº·½·»²¬´·¹¸¬·²¹©±«´¼²»»¼¬±¾»·²¬¿´´»¼ò̸»²»©½´·²·½ ©·´´´·µ»´§·²½´«¼»¿º«´´°¸¿®³¿½§¿²¼´¿¾±®¿¬±®§ò ¬¸ ̸»®»º±®»ô¬¸»Ð´¿²°®±°±»¬¸¿¬·º¬¸»Êß»´»½¬¬¸»ï¼É·´´¿³»¬¬»·¬»º±®·¬½´·²·½ô ¬¸»²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´º«²¼½±«´¼¾»«»¼¬±«°°±®¬¬¸»Êß·²´±½¿¬·²¹¼±©²¬±©²ò̸»Êß Ý´·²·½¼±©²¬±©²°®±¶»½¬·«°°±®¬»¼¾§¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ð´¿²ø×³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²Í¬®¿¬»¹§Üæ ɱ®µ©·¬¸´±½¿´ô¬¿¬»¿²¼º»¼»®¿´±ºº·½»¬±´±½¿¬»ô®»³¿·²±®»¨°¿²¼¼±©²¬±©²å ׳°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²Í¬®¿¬»¹§ÚæÉ±®µ©·¬¸³¿¶±®³»¼·½¿´°®±ª·¼»®¬±´±½¿¬»¬¸»·®º¿½·´·¬·»·² ¿²¼²»¿®¼±©²¬±©²÷¿²¼¬¸»Ù®±©¬¸Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬Ð±´·½·»ò ݸ¿°¬»®êæÛ¬·³¿¬»¼Ì±¬¿´Ý±¬±ºÛ¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬±®ß½¬·ª·¬§ôͱ«®½»±º Ó±²»§ô¿²¼ß²¬·½·°¿¬»¼Ý±³°´»¬·±²Ü¿¬»º±®Û¿½¸Ð®±¶»½¬±® ß½¬·ª·¬§ ̸·Î»°±®¬±²¬¸»îðïðд¿²ß³»²¼³»²¬·²½´«¼»¿¬¿¾´»¸±©·²¹¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»¬±¾» ½¿®®·»¼±«¬º±´´±©·²¹¬¸»¿¼±°¬·±²±º¬¸»¿³»²¼³»²¬¿²¼¬¸»»¬·³¿¬»¼½±¬òÌ¿¾´»ë¸±© ¬¸¿¬«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´º·²¿²½·²¹·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬±°®±ª·¼»üïé³·´´·±²ø±®¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ìçû÷±º º«²¼·²¹±«¬±º¿²»¬·³¿¬»¼¬±¬¿´±ºüíìòë³·´´·±²±º°«¾´·½¿²¼°®·ª¿¬»·²ª»¬³»²¬º®±³ ÚÇîðïðñîðïטּ®±«¹¸ÚÇîðïèñîðïçò Ì¿¾´»ë´·¬¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»Ð´¿²òÞ»´±©·¿¸±®¬¼»½®·°¬·±²±º»¿½¸±º ¬¸»Ð´¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬°®±¶»½¬ò 9 Ô¿²»Ý±³³«²·¬§Ý±´´»¹»Ò»©Ü±©²¬±©²Ý»²¬»®æ ̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´½±²·¼»®¬¸»¬»®³º±®¿² ¿¹®»»³»²¬¾»¬©»»²¬¸»ß¹»²½§¿²¼Ô¿²»Ý±³³«²·¬§Ý±´´»¹»øÔÝÝ÷ò̸»°»½·º·½°®±¶»½¬ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»¬±¾»«²¼»®¬¿µ»²©·´´¾»¼»º·²»¼¾§¬¸»ß¹»²½§ô»¬±«¬·²¬¸»¿¹®»»³»²¬©·¬¸ÔÝÝô ¿²¼³¿§·²½´«¼»·²¬»¹®¿¬·±²±º¿°«¾´·½¿º»¬§¬¿¬·±²¿²¼ñ±®±°»²°¿½»©·¬¸·²¬¸» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°®±¶»½¬òÔÝݽ«®®»²¬´§¸¿üïéòë³·´´·±²·²±¬¸»®º«²¼¬±½±²¬®·¾«¬»¬±¬¸» °®±¶»½¬òÔÝÝ·«²¼»®¹±·²¹¿º»¿·¾·´·¬§¿²¿´§·¬¸¿¬©·´´°®±ª·¼»¿¼»¬¿·´»¼½±¬»¬·³¿¬»º±®¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ò̸»¬±¬¿´°®±¶»½¬½±¬·»¨°»½¬»¼¬±·¹²·º·½¿²¬´§»¨½»»¼¬¸»üïéòë³·´´·±²¬¸¿¬¸¿ ¾»»²»½«®»¼¬±¼¿¬»òݱ²¬®«½¬·±²·¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼¬±¬¿®¬·²»¿®´§îðïïôº±®½±³°´»¬·±²²±´¿¬»® ¬¸¿²îðïíò Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»æ ̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´«°°±®¬¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»Ù¿®¿¹»¾§³¿µ·²¹¬¸» ¿²²«¿´¼»¾¬°¿§³»²¬ø¾±¬¸°®·²½·°¿´¿²¼·²¬»®»¬÷ô©¸·½¸©·´´»½«®»¬¸»º·²¿²½·¿´¬¿¾·´·¬§±º ¬¸»¹¿®¿¹»ô»²¸¿²½»¿º»¬§»®ª·½»¿²¼®»´·»ª»¬¸»¬®«¹¹´·²¹Ð¿®µ·²¹Ú«²¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ý·¬§±º Û«¹»²»ò̸»«°°±®¬©·´´¬¿µ»°´¿½»¬¿®¬·²¹·²ÚÇîðïðñîðïïò ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬Í°¿½»×³°®±ª»³»²¬±²¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µæ ̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´°»²¼«°¬± üëððôððð±²·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»Ð¿®µÞ´±½µ·²±®¼»®¬±³¿µ»¬¸¿¬´±½¿¬·±²³±®»¿¬¬®¿½¬·ª» ¿²¼º«²½¬·±²¿´º±®¬¸»ú?«?ÅÓ¿®µ»¬ò̸»·³°®±ª»³»²¬©·´´¬¿®¬·²ÚÇîðïðñîðïïò ÊßÝ´·²·½æ ̸»Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬±ºÊ»¬»®¿²ßºº¿·®øÊß÷·°´¿²²·²¹¬±´±½¿¬»¿²»¨°¿²¼»¼½´·²·½·² ²·½ò̸» ´»¿»¼°¿½»·²¬¸»Û«¹»²»¿®»¿òܱ©²¬±©²Û«¹»²»³¿§¾»¿²·¼»¿´¿®»¿º±®¬¸»½´· ´»¿»¿©¿®¼·»¬·³¿¬»¼º±®¬¸»´¿¬¯«¿®¬»®±ºîðï𱮬¸»º·®¬¯«¿®¬»®±ºîðïïò׺¬¸» ¼±©²¬±©²´±½¿¬·±²·»´»½¬»¼ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§©·´´½±²·¼»®¬¸»¬»®³º±®¿²¿¹®»»³»²¬¾»¬©»»² ¬¸»ß¹»²½§¿²¼Êß¿²¼ñ±®¬¸»°®±°»®¬§±©²»®ò̸»°»½·º·½°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»¬±¾»«²¼»®¬¿µ»² ©·´´¾»¼»º·²»¼¾§¬¸»ß¹»²½§¿²¼»¬±«¬·²¿²¿¹®»»³»²¬òß´¬¸±«¹¸²±»¬·³¿¬»©¿«»¼º±® °®·ª¿¬»°¿®¬§±®Êß½±²¬®·¾«¬·±²ô±¬¸»®«½¸½±²¬®·¾«¬·±²©±«´¼¾»¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼ò̸»Êß°´¿² ¬±±½½«°§¬¸»²»©´±½¿¬·±²ø¿»´»½¬»¼¬¸®±«¹¸¬¸»ÎÚÐ÷¾§Ü»½»³¾»®îðïîò Ю±¶»½¬Ü»´·ª»®§ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²æ ß½¬·±²º±®¬¸·¿½¬·ª·¬§·²½´«¼»°®±¹®¿³¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²ø°®± ¶»½¬³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ôº·²¿²½·¿´»®ª·½»ô¼»¾¬·«¿²½»¿²¼¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²÷å´»¹¿´»®ª·½»å®»°±®¬·²¹ ø¾«¼¹»¬ôº·²¿²½·¿´÷å°®»°¿®¿¬·±²±º³¿®µ»¬ôº»¿·¾·´·¬§ô±®±¬¸»®»½±²±³·½¬«¼·»å°®»°¿®¿¬·±² ±º¼»·¹²ô¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ô»²¹·²»»®·²¹ô´¿²¼½¿°·²¹¿®½¸·¬»½¬«®¿´ô°´¿²²·²¹ô¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô±® ±¬¸»®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿´¬«¼·»å°®±ª·¼·²¹¿½½±«²¬·²¹±®¿«¼·¬»®ª·½»å°®±ª·¼·²¹°»½·¿´®»¸¿¾ ·´·¬¿¬·±²ô®»¬±®¿¬·±²ô±®®»²±ª¿¬·±²º»¿·¾·´·¬§¿²¼½±¬¿²¿´§·¬«¼·»å¿·¬·²¹·²°®»°¿®¿¬·±² ±º¬¸»¿²²«¿´º·²¿²½·¿´®»°±®¬®»¯«·®»¼«²¼»®Í»½¬·±²èð𱺬¸»Ð´¿²å°®±ª·¼·²¹°®±°»®¬§ ¿½¯«··¬·±²¿°°®¿·¿´å¿²¼»ª¿´«¿¬·±²±º¬¸»°´¿²¿²¼¬¸»«½½»±º·¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»ò̸»ß¹»²½§ ³¿§¿´±¿½¯«·®»ô®»²¬ô±®´»¿»±ºº·½»°¿½»¿²¼±ºº·½»º«®²·¬«®»ô»¯«·°³»²¬ô¿²¼º¿½·´·¬·» ²»½»¿®§º±®·¬¬±½±²¼«½¬·¬¿ºº¿·®·²¬¸»³¿²¿¹»³»²¬¿²¼·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²±º¬¸·°´¿²ò Ю±¶»½¬·±²º±®¼·¬®·½¬¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²¿«³»¬¸¿¬±²½»¬¸»ÔÝÝ¿²¼Þ»¿³°®±¶»½¬¿®» ½±³°´»¬»ô¼·¬®·½¬¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²»¨°»²»©·´´¾»®»¼«½»¼¬±¿³·²·³¿´´»ª»´¬¸¿¬©·´´¾» «ºº·½·»²¬¬±»²«®»¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²±º±«¬¬¿²¼·²¹¼»¾¬ô¾«¼¹»¬¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô¿²¼º·²¿²½·¿´ ®»°±®¬°®»°¿®¿¬·±²òͰ»½·º·½¿´´§ô¬¸»¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²°®±¶»½¬·±²·²½´«¼»¬¿ºº·²¹¿¬ïòìÚÌÛº±® §»¿®ÚÇïטּ®±«¹¸ÚÇïíº±´´±©»¼¾§ðòïìÚÌÛº±®§»¿®ÚÇï쬸®±«¹¸ÚÇïçòß¼¼·¬·±²¿´·¬»³·² 10 ¬¸»°®±¶»½¬·±²·²½´«¼»´»¹¿´¿²¼½±²«´¬·²¹º»»²»½»¿®§¬±°®±¬»½¬¬¸»Ý·¬§ñß¹»²½§¿²¼½±³ °´»¬»¬¸»Ð´¿²Ð®±¶»½¬ô¼»¾¬·«¿²½»½±¬²»»¼»¼º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ô¿²¼°®±°»®¬§³¿²¿¹»³»²¬ò Table 5 List of Project Activities and the Estimated Cost Total Project Activity Estimated Cost LCC New Downtown Center $ 8,000,000 Broadway Place Garages & Public Safety Improvements $ 4,810,000 Park Block Improvements for the Farmers' Market $ 500,000 VA Clinic $ 2,500,000 Project Delivery Administration (through FY2018/2019) $ 1,190,000 Projects Funded from Urban Renewal Agency $ 17,000,000 Projects Funded from Private Sources and Other Federal, State and Local Government $ 17,500,000 TOTAL Funding for All Projects $ 34,500,000 Ю±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»©·´´¾»¹·²·²ÚÇîðïðñîðïïòÜ»½··±²±²°®·±®·¬·»±ºº«²¼·²¹º±®°®±¶»½¬ ¿½¬·ª·¬·»©·´´¾»³¿¼»¾§¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼·²·¬¿²²«¿´¾«¼¹»¬°®±½»¿²¼¿¬®»¹«´¿®ß¹»²½§ Þ±¿®¼³»»¬·²¹ô¿´´±º©¸·½¸¿®»±°»²¬±¬¸»°«¾´·½òݱ²¬®«½¬·±²±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬½±²¬»³°´¿¬»¼ ·²¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬·»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¾»½±³°´»¬»¼¾§îðïíòÜ»¾¬·«»¼¬±º«²¼¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬±¾»°¿·¼±ºº¾§ÚÇîðïèñîðïçò ̸»ß¹»²½§Ü·®»½¬±®¸¿´´½±²ª»²»²±¬´»¬¸¿²±²½»»¿½¸§»¿®¿½±³³·¬¬»»±º«½¸°»®±²¬± °®»°¿®»¿®»°±®¬¬±¬¸»Ü·®»½¬±®±²¿÷¬¸»¿½¬·ª·¬·»±º¬¸»ß¹»²½§º±®¬¸»°®»ª·±«º·½¿´§»¿®ô ¿²¼¾÷©¸»¬¸»®¬¸»ÐªYÅ»¨°»²¼·¬«®»±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬¼±´´¿®©¿´·³·¬»¼¬±¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸·Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸»¿±½·¿¬»¼¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»½±¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»¼¾§¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸» Ü·®»½¬±®¸¿´´º±®©¿®¼¬¸¿¬®»°±®¬¬±¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼«°±²·¬®»½»·°¬ò 11 ݸ¿°¬»®éæÛ¬·³¿¬»¼ß³±«²¬±ºÓ±²»§¿²¼ß²¬·½·°¿¬»¼Ç»¿®·²É¸·½¸ ײ¼»¾¬»¼²»©·´´¾»Î»¬·®»¼±®Ñ¬¸»®©·»Ð®±ª·¼»¼Ú±®Ë²¼»® ÑÎÍìëéòìîð¬±ìëéòìêð ̸»¬±¬¿´½±¬±º¿´´°®±¶»½¬·»¬·³¿¬»¼¿¬üïéôðððôðð𾻬©»»²ÚÇîðïðñîðï￲¼ ÚÇîðïèñîðïçò̸»°®±¶»½¬©·´´¾»º«²¼»¼©·¬¸¿½±³¾·²¿¬·±²±º«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ º·²¿²½·²¹«²¼»®ÑÎÍìë鿲¼±¬¸»®±«®½»ò̸»ß¹»²½§³¿§¿°°´§º±®º«²¼·²¹º®±³±¬¸»® º»¼»®¿´ô¬¿¬»ô¿²¼´±½¿´¹®¿²¬·²±®¼»®¬±½±³°´»¬»¬¸»°®±¶»½¬òÒ±²Ý·¬§¼»ª»´±°»®©·´´º«²¼ ±³»±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬½±¬òײ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô¬¸»°«¾´·½º¿½·´·¬·»·²½´«¼»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²³¿§¿´±¾» º«²¼»¼·²°¿®¬©·¬¸±¬¸»®°«¾´·½º«²¼ô«½¸¿§¬»³¼»ª»´±°³»²¬½¸¿®¹»¿²¼¹»²»®¿´ ±¾´·¹¿¬·±²¾±²¼ô¿³±²¹±¬¸»®±«®½»ò Ñ®»¹±²Î»ª·»¼Í¬¿¬«¬»®»¯«·®»¬¸¿¬»¿½¸«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬¬¸¿¬®»½»·ª»°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨» ·²½´«¼»¿Â«Zëk«Ãª?ªÁ´·³·¬·²¬¸»·®«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´°´¿²òÂÜZëk« ê?ªÁ·¿®»¯«·®»¼°»²¼·²¹½¿°º±®¿´´°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»¨°»²¼·¬«®»±ª»®¿°»®·±¼±º ¬·³»òÂÜZëk«Ãª?ªÁ·²±¬¿´»¹¿´¼»¾¬´·³·¬ò׬·³±®»´·µ»¿°»²¼·²¹´·³·¬ò ß¼±°¬·²¹¿³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º·¹«®»¼±»²±¬¿«¬¸±®·¦»±®±¾´·¹¿¬»¬¸»ß¹»²½§¬±°»²¼ ³±²»§±®»²¬»®·²¬±¼»¾¬ò É·¬¸·²¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»´·³·¬¿¬·±²ô¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼¸¿ ¬¸»¿¾·´·¬§¬±º«²¼°®±¶»½¬±ª»®¬·³»ô»·¬¸»®©·¬¸½¿¸±®¾§·«·²¹¼»¾¬ò Ý»®¬¿·²»¨°»²¼·¬«®»¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿²¼½»®¬¿·²»¨°»² ¼·¬«®»¿®»»¨½´«¼»¼òÚ±®·²¬¿²½»ô½¿¸°¿§³»²¬º±®°®±¶»½¬¿²¼¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»»¨°»²»¿®» ·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»½¿´½«´¿¬·±²ô¾«¬»¨°»²¼·¬«®»³¿¼»º®±³±«®½»±¬¸»®¬¸¿²¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ ®»ª»²«»¿®»²±¬·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»°»²¼·²¹´·³·¬ô«½¸¿Ü±©²¬±©²Î»ª·¬¿´·¦¿¬·±²Ô±¿²Ð®±¹®¿³ º«²¼òײ¿¼¼·¬·±²ô·²¬»®»¬±²¼»¾¬·²±¬·²½´«¼»¼·²³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»ô²±®·¬¸» ®»º·²¿²½·²¹±º»¨·¬·²¹·²¼»¾¬»¼²»ò̸»°»½·º·½´·³·¬¿¬·±²±º¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²» ¿³±«²¬¿®»°»´´»¼±«¬·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ò ̸»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´¿³»²¼»¼¬¸»Ð´¿²·²ïçç謱·²½´«¼»¿³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»´·³·¬±ºüíí ³·´´·±²ò̸»üíí³·´´·±²º·¹«®»®»°®»»²¬»¼¬¸»¿³±«²¬¬¸¿¬¬¸»ß¹»²½§©¿¿´´±©»¼¬± ½«³«´¿¬·ª»´§°»²¼·²¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»¬¿®¬·²¹·²ïççèò̸¿¬º·¹«®»©¿¾¿»¼±²¬¸» »¬·³¿¬»¼½±¬±º¾«·´¼·²¹¿²»©³¿·²´·¾®¿®§ô°´«½±²¬·²«¿¬·±²±º¬¸»¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»½±¬·² ¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ô°®»°¿®·²¹¿²²«¿´º·²¿²½·¿´¬¿¬»³»²¬ô¼·°±·²¹±º¬¸»º±®³»®Í»¿®¾«·´¼·²¹±² ¬¸ ïðߪ»²«»¿²¼Ý¸¿®²»´¬±²Í¬®»»¬ô±ª»®»»·²¹½±³°´»¬·±²±º¬¸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»¿²¼Ñª»®°¿®µ »´»ª¿¬±®°®±¶»½¬ô¿²¼¿¼³·²·¬»®·²¹¬¸»´±¿²°±®¬º±´·±ò׬·²½´«¼»¼¿²¿²²«¿´·²º´¿¬·±²º¿½¬±®±º ëû±²°®±¶»½¬½±¬ô¿²¼»¨½´«¼»¼»¨·¬·²¹¼»¾¬ò ß±ºÚÇïðô¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»´·³·¬±ºüíí³·´´·±²¸¿¿´³±¬¾»»²º«´´§°»²¬±®½±³ ³·¬¬»¼ô©·¬¸¬¸»¾«´µ¸¿ª·²¹¾»»²°»²¬±²¾«·´¼·²¹¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²´·¾®¿®§ò̸»¿³±«²¬±º ®»³¿·²·²¹³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¿¬¿²§¹·ª»²¬·³»·¿²»¬·³¿¬»¾¿»¼±²¾±¬¸¿½¬«¿´ ¸·¬±®·½°»²¼·²¹¿²¼»¬·³¿¬»¼º«¬«®»½±³³·¬³»²¬ò̸»¿³±«²¬½«®®»²¬´§®»³¿·²·²¹ «²½±³³·¬¬»¼·»¬·³¿¬»¼¿¬¿¾±«¬üèëðôðððô¿º¬»®¬¿µ·²¹·²¬±¿½½±«²¬¼·¬®·½¬¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±² 12 ¬¸®±«¹¸ÚÇîðïðñîðïïòß¼¼·¬·±²¿´°®±¶»½¬º±®¬¸»¼±©²¬±©²¿º»¬§·²·¬·¿¬·ª»¿®»»¨°»½¬»¼¬± «»±³»±º¬¸¿¬®»³¿·²·²¹½¿°¿½·¬§°®·±®¬±¬¸»îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬ò ײ¬¸»îððç´»¹·´¿¬·ª»»·±²ôØÞíðëê©¿¿°°®±ª»¼¿²¼·²½´«¼»½¸¿²¹»¬±ÑÎÍìëéô¬¸» «®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¬¿¬«¬»òѲ»±º¬¸±»½¸¿²¹»·¬¸¿¬·²½®»¿»·²³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»³¿§ ²±¬»¨½»»¼¿²¿¹¹®»¹¿¬»±ºîðû±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»±º¬¸»°´¿²ô·²½´«¼·²¹¿² ï ̸»·²¼»¨¬¸¿¬³¿§¾»«»¼·¬¸»·²º´¿¬·±²®¿¬» ·²¼»¨·²¹º®±³Ö«´§ïôïçç謱֫´§ïôîððçò ·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»·²·¬·¿´³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»½¿´½«´¿¬·±²ò˲¼»®¬¸»°®±ª··±²±º¬¸·²»© ¬¿¬«¬»ô¬¸»üíí³·´´·±²±®·¹·²¿´³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»©±«´¼·²½®»¿»¬±üëêòì³·´´·±²ô«·²¹ ¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´ëû·²º´¿¬·±²®¿¬»º®±³Ö«´§ïôïçç謱֫´§ïôîððçò̸»¹®»¿¬»¬³¿¨·³«³ ·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º·¹«®»¿´´±©»¼ø©·¬¸±«¬±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬½±²½«®®»²½»÷ô·²½´«¼·²¹¿îðû ·²½®»¿»º®±³¬¸¿¬¿³±«²¬ô©±«´¼¾»üêéòé³·´´·±²ò ײ±®¼»®¬±½±³°´»¬»¬¸»º±«®°®±¶»½¬ô·¬·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬¸¿¬¿²·²½®»¿»±ºüïêôïëðôððð·²»»¼»¼ ·²¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»´·³·¬ò̸»·²½®»¿»·½¿´½«´¿¬»¼¿º±´´±©æ ÔÝÝЮ±¶»½¬üèôðððôððð ÊßÝ´·²·½îôëððôððð Ú¿®³»®Ó¿®µ»¬ëððôððð Ù¿®¿¹»Ü»¾¬ø°®·²½·°¿´±²´§÷ìôèïðôððð Ô»¹¿´ñÜ»¾¬×«¿²½»ñß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²ïôïçðôððð ̱¬¿´Ú«²¼Ò»»¼»¼º±®Ð®±¶»½¬üïéôðððôððð Ô»æß³±«²¬Î»³¿·²·²¹Ë²¼»®Ý«®®»²¬Í°»²¼·²¹Ý¿°èëðôððð Ò»¬ß³±«²¬±ºÓ¿¨·³«³×²¼»¾¬»¼²»×²½®»¿»üïêôïëðôððð Ò±¬×²½´«¼»¼·²Ó¿¨·³«³×²¼»¾¬»¼²»Ý¿°æ ײ¬»®»¬±²ÔÝÝЮ±¶»½¬Ü»¾¬ø»¬·³¿¬»¼÷îôîððôððð ײ¬»®»¬±²Ð¿®µ·²¹Ù¿®¿¹»Ü»¾¬ïôëððôððð ö׬¸±«´¼¿´±¾»²±¬»¼¬¸¿¬©¸»²¬¸»¹¿®¿¹»¼»¾¬·°¿·¼±ººô¬¸»Ã?YÅп®µ·²¹Ú«²¼©·´´½±²¬·²«»¬± °¿§º±®¬¸»½±¬±º°±´·½»±ºº·½»®ò̸¿¬¿³±«²¬·²±¬·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»½¸¿®¬¿¾±ª»ò ̸»·²½®»¿»·²³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»±ºüïêôïëðôðð𩱫´¼®»«´¬·²¿®»ª·»¼³¿¨·³«³ ·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º·¹«®»±ºüìçôïëðôðððô©¸·½¸®»°®»»²¬½«³«´¿¬·ª»°»²¼·²¹·²¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©² Ü·¬®·½¬º®±³ïçç謱¬¸»»²¼±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸·®»ª·»¼³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»¿³±«²¬·¬¸» »¬·³¿¬»¼¿³±«²¬²»»¼»¼¬±¿½½±³°´·¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬«²¼»®¬¸»½«®®»²¬°®±¶»½¬¿«³°¬·±² ¿²¼¬±°®±ª·¼»º±®¼·¬®·½¬¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·±²ò׬·©·¬¸·²¬¸»´·³·¬»¬¿¾´·¸»¼«²¼»®ÑÎÍìëéòìéðò Ì¿¾´»ê·²Û¨¸·¾·¬Û·²½´«¼»·²º±®³¿¬·±²¿¾±«¬º«¬«®»®»ª»²«»¿²¼»¨°»²¼·¬«®»·²¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ò ̸»¬·³·²¹¿²¼¿³±«²¬º±®·²¼·ª·¼«¿´°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»©·´´¾»¼»¬»®³·²»¼¾§¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼ »¿½¸§»¿®¼«®·²¹¬¸»¿²²«¿´¾«¼¹»¬°®±½»òݱ³°´»¬·±²¼¿¬»º±®·²¼·ª·¼«¿´¿½¬·ª·¬·»³¿§¾» ï ̸·°®±ª··±²³¿§¾»½¸¿²¹»¼·º©®·¬¬»²½±²½«®®»²½»·±¾¬¿·²»¼º®±³¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¬¸¿¬ ·³°±»¿¬´»¿¬éëû±º¬¸»¬¿¨»«²¼»®°»®³¿²»²¬®¿¬»´·³·¬·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ò 13 ¿ºº»½¬»¼¾§½¸¿²¹»·²¬¸»°´¿²±º±¬¸»®°®·ª¿¬»±®°«¾´·½°¿®¬²»®ô´±½¿´»½±²±³·½¿²¼³¿®µ»¬ ½±²¼·¬·±²ô½¸¿²¹»·²¬¸»¿ª¿·´¿¾·´·¬§±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼ô¿²¼½¸¿²¹»·²°®·±®·¬·»º±® ½¿®®§·²¹±«¬°®±¶»½¬¿½¬·ª·¬·»ò̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´½±²ª»²»¿½±³³·¬¬»»¿¬´»¿¬±²½»»¿½¸§»¿®¬± °®»°¿®»¿®»°±®¬±²»¨°»²¼·¬«®»º®±³¬¸»°®»ª·±«º·½¿´§»¿®·²½±³°¿®·±²¬±¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸» Ü·®»½¬±®¸¿´´º±®©¿®¼¬¸¿¬®»°±®¬¬±¬¸»ß¹»²½§Þ±¿®¼«°±²·¬®»½»·°¬ò Ý«®®»²¬°®±¶»½¬·±²¸±©¬¸¿¬¬¸»¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»¸±«´¼¾»«ºº·½·»²¬¬±°¿§º±®¬¸» °®±¶»½¬¿²¼¿±½·¿¬»¼¼»¾¬¾§ÚÇîðïèñîðïçò̸»¼·¬®·½¬©±«´¼¬»®³·²¿¬»±²½»¬¸»¼»¾¬· ®»°¿·¼òøÌ¸»¼·¬®·½¬·²±¬»¨°»½¬»¼¬±²»»¼¬±½±´´»½¬¬¿¨®»ª»²«»·²¬¸»º·²¿´§»¿®ôÚÇîðïçò÷ ݸ¿°¬»®èæÚ·²¿²½·¿´ß²¿´§·±º¬¸»Ð´¿²©·¬¸Í«ºº·½·»²¬×²º±®³¿¬·±²¬± Ü»¬»®³·²»Ú»¿·¾·´·¬§ ̸»º·²¿²½·¿´¿²¿´§·±º¬¸»°´¿²¸±©²·²Ì¿¾´»ê·²Û¨¸·¾·¬Û·²½´«¼»¬¸»¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼¬¿¨ ·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»±ª»®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»¼®»³¿·²·²¹´·º»±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ò̸»¿²¿´§·¸±©¬¸¿¬¬¸» ¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»¿®»¾¿»¼±²®»¿±²¿¾´»°®±¶»½¬·±²±º²»©¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ¿²¼¿°°®»½·¿¬·±²·²»¨·¬·²¹°®±°»®¬§ª¿´«»ò̸»°®±¶»½¬·±²±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»·¾¿»¼ ±²¬¸»º±´´±©·²¹¿«³°¬·±²æ ̸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿©·´´¾»»¨°¿²¼»¼·²ÚÇïîô·²½®»¿·²¹¬¸»º®±¦»²¾¿»¾§¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§üïì ³·´´·±²ò Ю±°»®¬§¿»»¼ª¿´«»©·´´·²½®»¿»¾§îû°»®§»¿®ô©¸·½¸·²½´«¼»·²½®»¿»±²»¨·¬·²¹ °®±°»®¬§¿©»´´¿¿³¿´´¿³±«²¬±º²»©·²ª»¬³»²¬·²»¨·¬·²¹¼±©²¬±©²¿®»¿ °®±°»®¬·»ò Ѳ»·¹²·º·½¿²¬ô²»©¬¿¨¿¾´»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬·¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼¼«®·²¹¬¸»®»³¿·²¼»®±º¬¸»´·º»±º ¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬òÞ»¿³Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬·½«®®»²¬´§©±®µ·²¹±²®»¸¿¾·´·¬¿¬·²¹¬¸»Ý»²¬®»Ý±«®¬ ¾«·´¼·²¹ô¿¬É·´´¿³»¬¬»¿²¼Þ®±¿¼©¿§ò̸»°®±¶»½¬·±²¿«³»¬¸¿¬¬¸·°®±¶»½¬· ½±³°´»¬»¼¿²¼¹»²»®¿¬»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¬¿¨¿¾´»ª¿´«»©·¬¸·²¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ò ̸»Þ®±¿¼©¿§Ð´¿½»`±£?«ª?ÅÓ«´¬·Ë²·¬Ð®±°»®¬§Ì¿¨Û¨»³°¬·±²©·´´»¨°·®»ô¿²¼¬¸» °®±¶»½¬©·´´¬¿®¬°¿§·²¹¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¬¿¨»¾»¹·²²·²¹·²ÚÇïïò Ì¿¨®¿¬»¿°°´·½¿¾´»¬±¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬¿®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±¹±¼±©²±ª»®¬·³»ô¼«»¬± ¬¸»Ñ®»¹±²¬¿¬«¬»¬¸¿¬¿§¬¸¿¬½»®¬¿·²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´°´¿²³¿§±²´§½±´´»½¬¬¿¨ ·²½®»³»²¬±²°»®³¿²»²¬¬¿¨®¿¬»±®¾±²¼¿²¼´»ª·»¿°°®±ª»¼¾§ª±¬»®°®·±®¬±Ñ½¬±¾»® êôîððïòײ°¿®¬·½«´¿®ô¾±²¼»¼¼»¾¬¬¿¨®¿¬»¿°°´·½¿¾´»¬±¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬©·´´¾» ®»¼«½»¼¿¾±²¼¿°°®±ª»¼¾§ª±¬»®°®·±®¬±Ñ½¬±¾»®êôîððï¿®»®»¬·®»¼ò ̸»°®±¶»½¬·±²®»«´¬·²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¬¿¨®»ª»²«»¾»¬©»»²ÚÇîðïðñîðï￲¼ÚÇîðïèñîðïç ±º¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§üïé³·´´·±²ò̱¹»¬¸»®©·¬¸±¬¸»®®»ª»²«»¿²¼»¨·¬·²¹º«²¼¾¿´¿²½»ô¬¸»» 14 î ®»ª»²«»©·´´«°°±®¬¬¸»üïêôïëðôðð𱺷²½®»¿»¼³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»°®±°±»¼«²¼»® ¬¸·Ð´¿²ß³»²¼³»²¬òײ¿¼¼·¬·±²¬±¬¸»®»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»®»ª»²«»©·´´¾»«ºº· ½·»²¬¬±°¿§º±®¿¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»¿½¬·ª·¬·»ô·²½´«¼·²¹¿²¿´´±½¿¬·±²±º½»²¬®¿´»®ª·½»±ª»®¸»¿¼ ½±¬ò̸±»½±¬¿®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±·²½®»¿»±ª»®¬·³»¼«»¬±·²º´¿¬·±²¿¬¿®¿¬»±ºîû°»®§»¿®ò ̸»ß¹»²½§©·´´¿´±½¿®®§¿®»»®ª»±²±«¬¬¿²¼·²¹¾±²¼«²¬·´¬¸±»¾±²¼¿®»º«´´§°¿·¼±ººô ¿©»´´¿¿¾¿´¿²½»»¯«¿´¬±¬©±³±²¬¸±º±°»®¿¬·²¹½±¬»¿½¸§»¿®ô°»®Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²» º·²¿²½·¿´°±´·½§ò ݸ¿°¬»®çæÚ·½¿´×³°¿½¬Í¬¿¬»³»²¬¬¸¿¬Û¬·³¿¬»¬¸»×³°¿½¬±º¬¸»Ì¿¨ ײ½®»³»²¬Ú·²¿²½·²¹ôÞ±¬¸Ë²¬·´¿²¼ßº¬»®¬¸»×²¼»¾¬»¼²»· λ°¿·¼ô˰±²ß´´Û²¬·¬·»Ô»ª§·²¹Ì¿¨»Ë°±²Ð®±°»®¬§·²¬¸»Ð´¿² ß®»¿ Ì¿¨·²¹¾±¼·»¬¸¿¬±ª»®´¿°©·¬¸¬¸»ß¹»²½§¿®»¿ºº»½¬»¼¾§¬¸»«»±º¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º«²¼¬± ·³°´»³»²¬¬¸»Ð´¿²òɸ»²¿¼·¬®·½¬·º·®¬½®»¿¬»¼ô¬¸»¿»»¼ª¿´«»©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿· »¬¿¾´·¸»¼¿¬¸»Âø?£TªÈÁ̸··¿©¿§±ºµ»»°·²¹¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ Â_Æ£±Á¿±º¬¸»¼¿¬»¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬·½®»¿¬»¼òײ¬¸»±®§ô·º«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´»ºº±®¬ ¿®»«½½»º«´ô¬¸»ª¿´«»±º¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬©·´´¹®±©¿¾±ª»¬¸»¾¿»ò̸¿¬·²½®»¿»·½¿´´»¼¬¸» Âê?«ª?±`±kÁ±®ÂZ`±kÈÁЮ±°»®¬§¬¿¨»º®±³¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±² ø½¸±±´ô¹»²»®¿´¹±ª»®²³»²¬ô¾±²¼÷¿®»¬¸»²¼·ª·¼»¼¿³±²¹¬¸»¶«®·¼·½¬·±²¬¸¿¬½±²¬·²«» ¬±®»½»·ª»¬¿¨»±²¬¸»º®±¦»²¾¿»ò̸»ËÎß®»½»·ª»¬¿¨»±²¬¸»·²½®»³»²¬¿´ª¿´«»ò̸·¸¿ ¿²·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º®»ª»²«»¬¸¿¬¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²®»½»·ª»ôª»®«©¸¿¬ »¼·º¬¸»®»©»®»²±«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬·²»ºº»½¬ò ¬¸»§©±«´¼¸¿ª»®»½»·ª ׳°¿½¬±²Ì¿¨Þ·´´æ×²¿¼¼·¬·±²¬±¬¸»·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²ô«®¾¿² ®»²»©¿´¿´±³¿µ»·²¼·ª·¼«¿´¬¿¨¾·´´´±±µ¼·ºº»®»²¬ò Ë®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬¼±²±¬·³°±» ²»©¬¿¨»å®¿¬¸»®ô¬¸»§®»¼·¬®·¾«¬»¬¿¨»º®±³±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¬±¬¸»«®¾¿² ®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬ò ̸»®»¿®»¬©±¾¿·½¬»°¬±«²¼»®¬¿²¼¸±©¿²·²¼·`Ãk±Å¬¿¨¾·´´· ¿ºº»½¬»¼¾§¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º·²¿²½·²¹·²Ñ®»¹±²ò̸»º·®¬¬»°¼»¬»®³·²»¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º °®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»¬¸¿¬¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿¹»²½§¸±«´¼®»½»·ª»ô¿²¼¬¸»»½±²¼¬»°¼»¬»®³·²» ¸±©¬¸»¬¿¨»¿®»¿½½±«²¬»¼º±®±²°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨¬¿¬»³»²¬ò ̸»º·®¬¬»°·²¼»¬»®³·²·²¹¸±©¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º·²¿²½·²¹¿ºº»½¬¿²ÃªÃ`Ãk±Å¬¿¨¾·´´½±²·¬ ±º¿°°´§·²¹¬¸»¬¿¨®¿¬»±º¬¸»¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ø«½¸¿¬¸»½·¬§ô½±«²¬§¿²¼½¸±±´¼·¬®·½¬÷¬± ¬¸»·²½®»³»²¬¿´ª¿´«»±º¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬ò̸¿¬°®±¼«½¬·¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º¬¿¨»¬¸¿¬ ¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿¹»²½§¸±«´¼®»½»·ª»ò̸»»½±²¼¬»°¼»¬»®³·²»¸±©¬±¼·ª·¼»±®°´·¬ 2 ̸»°®±°±»¼îðïðß³»²¼³»²¬ô·²½´«¼·²¹¬¸»³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»·²½®»¿»ô©·´´¾»®»ª·»©»¼¾§Ð´¿²²·²¹ ݱ³³··±²ô¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ô¿²¼¬¸»¹»²»®¿´°«¾´·½òߺ¬»®¬¸·®»ª·»©ô¬¸»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´³¿§ ½¸±±»¿¼·ºº»®»²¬³¿¨·³«³·²¼»¾¬»¼²»º·¹«®»ò 15 ¬¸»¬¿¨®¿¬»±º¬¸»¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬±¬¸¿¬©¸»²¬¸±»ÂÃ`Ã??Á¿®»¿°°´·»¼¬±¿´´¬¿¨¾·´´ ·²¬¸»Ý·¬§ô¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿¹»²½§®»½»·ª»·¬¸¿®»ô¿²¼¬¸»¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬®»½»·ª»¬¸» ®»³¿·²¼»®ò ̸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ß»±®¼»¬»®³·²»¸±©¬¸»¬¿¨®¿¬»º±®¬¸»½¸±±´ô½·¬§ô¿²¼½±«²¬§¸±«´¼ ¹»¬¼·ª·¼»¼¾»¬©»»²¬¸»¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¿²¼¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬òß±ºÜ»½»³¾»®îðïðô ¬¸»®»¿®»»ª»²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬·²Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§òß¿²»¨¿³°´»ô¬¸»Ã?YŰ»®³¿²»²¬ ¬¿¨®¿¬»·üéòððëè°»®üïôðð𱺿»»¼ª¿´«»ò̸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ß»±®¼·ª·¼»¬¸¿¬¬¿¨®¿¬» ·²¬±¬¸®»»°·»½»æüêòçðëê¹±»¬±¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»ôüðòðéìì¹±»¬±¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿² λ²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬ô¿²¼üðòðîëè¹±»¬±¬¸»Î·ª»®º®±²¬Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬ò̸·½¿´½«´¿¬·±²· ¼±²»º±®»¿½¸¬¿¨®¿¬»±²¬¸»¬¿¨¾·´´ò ߺ¬»®¬¿µ·²¹¬¸»·²º±®³¿¬·±²º®±³¬¸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ß»±®¿¾±«¬¬¸»¼·ª··±²±º¬¿¨®¿¬»ô¿² ¿²¿´§·½¿²¼»¬»®³·²»¸±©¿²·²¼·ª·¼«¿´¬¿¨¾·´´·¿ºº»½¬»¼¾§«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·ª··±²±º¬¿¨ò Ú±®¬¸»³»¼·¿²Û«¹»²»¸±³»¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ß»±®½¿´½«´¿¬»¼º±®ÚÇîððçñîðïðô¬¸· ³»¼·¿²¬¿¨°¿§»®©±«´¼»»²¬·¿´´§°¿§¬¸»¿³»¿³±«²¬±º¬±¬¿´¬¿¨»¾»º±®»±®¿º¬»®«®¾¿² ®»²»©¿´¼·ª··±²±º¬¿¨»ò̸»¼·ºº»®»²½»·¬¸¿¬¬¸»¬¿¨®»ª»²«»¿®»®»¿´´±½¿¬»¼º®±³¬¸» ±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¬±¬¸»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼·¬®·½¬òÌ¿¾´»é·²Û¨¸·¾·¬Ú»¬±«¬¬¸· ½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»¿ª»®¿¹»¬¿¨°¿§»®·²Û«¹»²»òß½¿²¾»»»²ô¬¸»¾»º±®»¿²¼¿º¬»®«®¾¿² ®»²»©¿´ª·»©±º¬¸·?Z?Y?ž·´´¿®»©·¬¸·²±²»°»²²§±º»¿½¸±¬¸»®ò ̸¿¬°»²²§ ®»°®»»²¬¬¸»»ºº»½¬±º¬®«²½¿¬·±²¿²¼®±«²¼·²¹ò ׳°¿½¬±²Ì¿¨Î¿¬»æ Ë®¾¿²®»²»©¿´²±³·²¿´´§¿ºº»½¬ª±¬»®¿°°®±ª»¼´±½¿´±°¬·±²´»ª·»¿²¼ ¾±²¼¾»½¿«»¬¸»¿ºº»½¬»¼¼·¬®·½¬¸¿´»°®±°»®¬§ª¿´«»¬±´»ª§¬¿¨»¿¹¿·²¬ô®»«´¬·²¹·² ´·¹¸¬´§¸·¹¸»®¬¿¨®¿¬»òÞ¿»¼±²¬¸»ÚÇîððçñîðï𬿨®¿¬»ô¬¸»»¬·³¿¬»¼·³°¿½¬±º¬¸· ´·¹¸¬¬¿¨®¿¬»·²½®»¿»º®±³¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬·¿¾±«¬üïòê꺱®¬¸» ¿ª»®¿¹»Û«¹»²»¬¿¨°¿§»®ô©¸·½¸®»°®»»²¬´»¬¸¿²ðòðëû±º¬¸»¬±¬¿´¬¿¨¾·´´±ºüîôçíè·² ÚÇîððçñîðïðò ׳°¿½¬±²Ñª»®´¿°°·²¹Ì¿¨·²¹Ü·¬®·½¬Î»ª»²«»æ Ú±®¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²ô¿ ¸¿®»±º°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»º®±³¬¸»ÂZ`±kÁ±®Âê?«ª?±`±kÁ·²±¬½±´´»½¬»¼¾§¬¸» ±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²¼«®·²¹¬¸»°»®·±¼±º¿²¿½¬·ª»¼·¬®·½¬ô©¸·½¸®»¼«½»®»ª»²«»ò̸» ·²½»²¬·ª»º±®¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¬±«°°±®¬«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´·¸·¹¸»®°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨®»ª»²«» ·²¬¸»´±²¹®«²òɸ»²¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬·»²¼»¼ô¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬¿®»¿¾´»¬±¬¿¨¬¸» »²¬·®»ª¿´«»©·¬¸·²¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬ò˲¼»®¬¸»¬¸»±®§±º«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´ô¬¸·ª¿´«»·¸·¹¸»®¬¸¿²·¬ ©±«´¼¸¿ª»¾»»²·º¬¸»®»¸¿¼¾»»²²±¼·¬®·½¬·²»ºº»½¬òײ¹»²»®¿´ô«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¼±»²±¬ ¼·®»½¬´§¿ºº»½¬¿²·²¼·ª·¼«¿´½¸±±´Y?«Å¾«¼¹»¬¾»½¿«»½¸±±´¿®»º«²¼»¼¾§¬¸»¬¿¬»±² ¿°»®°«°·´¾¿·ò ̸»»¬·³¿¬»¼¿³±«²¬±º«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¬¿¨»¬±¾»¼·ª·¼»¼±ª»®¬¸»®»³¿·²·²¹¬»®³±º¬¸» д¿²ø²»¬±º¼·½±«²¬ô¼»´·²¯«»²¬ô»¬½ò÷·¸±©²·²Ì¿¾´»è·²Û¨¸·¾·¬ÙòѲ´§¬¸»°»®³¿²»²¬ ¬¿¨®¿¬»±º¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¶«®·¼·½¬·±²¿®»½±²·¼»®»¼·²¬¸·¿²¿´§·¾»½¿«»¬¸»®»¿®»²± ´±½¿´±°¬·±²´»ª·»·²½´«¼»¼·²«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´®»ª»²«»º±®¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´ 16 Ü·¬®·½¬ô¿²¼¾±²¼»¼¼»¾¬¬¿¨®¿¬»©·´´¾»®»¼«½»¼º®±³§»¿®¬±§»¿®«²¬·´¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹¾±²¼ ¿®»°¿·¼±ººò ß½¿²¾»»»²·²Ì¿¾´»èô·²ÚÇîððçñîðïðô·¬·»¬·³¿¬»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»©±«´¼º±®»¹± ¿¾±«¬üèïðôðð𱺮»ª»²«»¾»½¿«»±º¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ë®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´Ü·¬®·½¬¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬ º·²¿²½·²¹òײÚÇîðïèñîðï翺¬»®¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º·²¿²½·²¹·¬»®³·²¿¬»¼ô¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»· »¬·³¿¬»¼¬±®»½»·ª»üïôïìðôðð𱺿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¬¿¨®»ª»²«»°»®§»¿®òÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§·»¬·³¿¬»¼ ¬±º±®»¹±üïëðôðð𱺮»ª»²«»·²¬¸»º·®¬º·½¿´§»¿®ô¿²¼¬±¾»²»º·¬¾§üîïðôðð𱺿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ¬¿¨®»ª»²«»°»®§»¿®¿º¬»®¼·ª··±²±º¬¿¨·¬»®³·²¿¬»¼·²ÚÇîðïèñîðïçò̸»½±³¾·²»¼½¸±±´ ¼·¬®·½¬¿®»»¬·³¿¬»¼¬±º±®»¹±üêëðôðð𱺮»ª»²«»·²¬¸»º·®¬º·½¿´§»¿®ô¿²¼¬±¾»²»º·¬¾§ üçîðôðð𱺿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¿²²«¿´¬¿¨®»ª»²«»¿º¬»®¬¸»¼·¬®·½¬·¬»®³·²¿¬»¼·²ÚÇîðïèñîðïçòß ³»²¬·±²»¼¿¾±ª»ô¸±©»ª»®ô¬¸»·³°¿½¬±²½¸±±´·®»¿´´§¿²·³°¿½¬±²¬¸»??ž«¼¹»¬ ¾»½¿«»½¸±±´¿®»³¿·²´§º«²¼»¼±²¿°»®°«°·´º«²¼·²¹º±®³«´¿®¿¬¸»®¬¸¿²¾§¬¸»´»ª»´±º °®±°»®¬§¬¿¨¼±´´¿®¹»²»®¿¬»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»·®¾±«²¼¿®·»ò ̸»²»¬·³°¿½¬±º¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬±²´±½¿´½¸±±´·¿´±±º¿¾±«¬üíïôððð°»®§»¿® ø¾¿»¼±²ÚÇïð÷¿º¬»®¿½½±«²¬·²¹º±®¬¸»Â??ŧ¬»³º±®½¸±±´º«²¼·²¹ò̸»Í¬¿¬» ¼»¬»®³·²»¸±©³«½¸³±²»§³«¬¾»¿´´±½¿¬»¼º±®¬¸»»¼«½¿¬·±²±º»¿½¸°«°·´¿½®±¬¸» ¬¿¬»ò׺¬¸»³±²»§·²±¬¿ª¿·´¿¾´»º®±³´±½¿´°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»ô¬¸»Í¬¿¬»©·´´³¿µ»«°¬¸» ½»òײÚÇïðô¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬¼·ª»®¬»¼üêëðôðð𱺴±½¿´°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»¬¸¿¬ ¼·ºº»®»² ©±«´¼¸¿ª»¹±²»¬±»¼«½¿¬·±²ò̸»Í¬¿¬»³¿¼»«°¬¸»¼·ºº»®»²½»ò ׺¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬¸¿¼²±¬¼·ª»®¬»¼¬¸±»º«²¼ô¬¸»Í¬¿¬»©±«´¼¸¿ª»¸¿¼¬¸»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ üêëðôðð𬱿´´±½¿¬»¿·¬½¸±»òײ±¬¸»®©±®¼ô¬¸»Í¬¿¬»½±«´¼¸¿ª»½¸±»²¬±¿´´±½¿¬»¬¸» ³±²»§¬±»¼«½¿¬·±²±®¬±±³»±¬¸»®¾«¼¹»¬¿®§°®·±®·¬§òØ¿¼¬¸»Í¬¿¬»½¸±»²¬±µ»»°¬¸» ³±²»§·²»¼«½¿¬·±²ô±³»±º¬¸¿¬³±²»§©±«´¼¸¿ª»®»¬«®²»¼¬±Û«¹»²»½¸±±´¾¿»¼±²¬¸» ¿°°´·½¿¾´»¬¿¬»©·¼»½¸±±´º«²¼·²¹º±®³«´¿ò˲¼»®¬¸»º±®³«´¿ôÛ«¹»²»Í½¸±±´Ü·¬®·½¬ì¶ ©±«´¼¸¿ª»®»½»·ª»¼¿¾±«¬üîðôðððåÔÝÝ©±«´¼¸¿ª»®»½»·ª»¼¿¾±«¬üïðôððð忲¼Ô¿²» Û¼«½¿¬·±²Í»®ª·½»Ü·¬®·½¬©±«´¼¸¿ª»®»½»·ª»¼¿¾±«¬üïôðððò ß¿®»«´¬±º¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬ô¬¸»Í¬¿¬»°®±ª·¼»¼¿²»¬üêîçôðð𺱮°»²¼·²¹·²Û«¹»²»ò É·¬¸±«¬¬¸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬º·²¿²½·²¹ô¬¸±»º«²¼©±«´¼¾»«»¼¬±º«²¼ ½¸±±´¼·¬®·½¬¬¸®±«¹¸±«¬¬¸»¬¿¬»ò λ¼«½»¼Î¿¬»Ð´¿²æ ̸»Ü±©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬·¿Â?k®¿¬»?±ªÁ«²¼»®¬¸»¬¿¬«¬»ô©¸·½¸ ³»¿²¬¸¿¬¬¸»°®±°»®¬§¬¿¨»¬¸¿¬³¿§¾»«»¼¬±º«²¼«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿½¬·ª·¬·»·´·³·¬»¼¬± ¬¸»°»®³¿²»²¬¬¿¨®¿¬»¿²¼¿²§¾±²¼±®´±½¿´±°¬·±²´»ª·»¬¸¿¬©»®»¿°°®±ª»¼¾§ª±¬»® °®·±®¬±Ñ½¬±¾»®îððïò̸»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬¿¨®¿¬»«»¼¬±¹»²»®¿¬»«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´®»ª»²«»º±®¬¸» ܱ©²¬±©²Ü·¬®·½¬©·´´¾»®»¼«½»¼±ª»®¬·³»¿¾±²¼¿°°®±ª»¼¾§ª±¬»®¾»º±®»Ñ½¬±¾»®îððï ¿®»°¿·¼±ººòË®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¬¿¨·²½®»³»²¬®»ª»²«»·½±«²¬»¼¬±©¿®¼¬¸»Ó»¿«®»ë¹»²»®¿´ ¹±ª»®²³»²¬¬¿¨®¿¬»½¿°±ºüïð°»®üïôðð𱺿»»¼ª¿´«»òײ۫¹»²»ô¬¸»¹»²»®¿´ ¹±ª»®²³»²¬½¿¬»¹±®§±º¬¿¨»·²±¬½«®®»²¬´§·²Ó»¿«®»ë¬¿¨®¿¬»½±³°®»·±²ô±¬¸··²±¬ ¿·¹²·º·½¿²¬º¿½¬±®·²»ª¿´«¿¬·²¹¬¸»·³°¿½¬±º«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´±²¬¸»±ª»®´¿°°·²¹¬¿¨·²¹¼·¬®·½¬ ®»ª»²«»ò 17 ݸ¿°¬»®ïðæÎ»´±½¿¬·±²Î»°±®¬ ßòλ¯«·®»³»²¬ ß²¿²¿´§·±º¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹®»·¼»²½»±º¾«·²»»®»¯«·®»¼¬±®»´±½¿¬»°»®³¿²»²¬´§±® ¬»³°±®¿®·´§¿¿®»«´¬±ºß¹»²½§¿½¬·±²«²¼»®ÑÎÍìëéòïéðò λ°±²» Ò±°»½·º·½®»´±½¿¬·±²¿½¬·ª·¬§··¼»²¬·º·»¼·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ò׺«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿·¬¿²½»®»«´¬·² ®»´±½¿¬·±²®»¯«·®»³»²¬ô¿®»´±½¿¬·±²°´¿²©·´´¾»¼»ª»´±°»¼º±®¬¸¿¬°«®°±»òλ´±½¿¬·±² ¿½¬·ª·¬·»¿²¼¿·¬¿²½»©±«´¼¾»°®±ª·¼»¼·²¿½½±®¼¿²½»©·¬¸ÑÎÍîèïòðì문®±«¹¸ îèïòïðëò Þòλ¯«·®»³»²¬ ß¼»½®·°¬·±²±º¬¸»³»¬¸±¼¬±¾»«»¼º±®¬¸»¬»³°±®¿®§±®°»®³¿²»²¬®»´±½¿¬·±²±º °»®±²´·ª·²¹·²¿²¼¾«·²»»·¬«¿¬»¼·²ô¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿·²¿½½±®¼¿²½»©·¬¸ÑÎÍîèïòðìë ¬¸®±«¹¸îèïòïðëò λ°±²» Ò±°»½·º·½®»´±½¿¬·±²¿½¬·ª·¬§··¼»²¬·º·»¼·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ò׺«®¾¿²®»²»©¿´¿·¬¿²½»®»«´¬·² ®»´±½¿¬·±²®»¯«·®»³»²¬ô¿®»´±½¿¬·±²°´¿²©·´´¾»¼»ª»´±°»¼º±®¬¸¿¬°«®°±»òλ´±½¿¬·±² ¿½¬·ª·¬·»¿²¼¿·¬¿²½»©±«´¼¾»°®±ª·¼»¼·²¿½½±®¼¿²½»©·¬¸ÑÎÍîèïòðì문®±«¹¸ îèïòïðëò Ýòλ¯«·®»³»²¬ ß²»²«³»®¿¬·±²ô¾§½±¬®¿²¹»ô±º¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹¸±«·²¹«²·¬·²¬¸»°´¿²¿®»¿¬±¾» ¼»¬®±§»¼±®¿´¬»®»¼¿²¼²»©«²·¬¬±¾»¿¼¼»¼ò λ°±²» Ò±°»½·º·½»¨·¬·²¹¸±«·²¹«²·¬¿®»°®±°±»¼¬±¾»®»³±ª»¼¾§¿½¬·±²±º¬¸»Ð´¿²ò Üòλ¯«·®»³»²¬ ß¼»½®·°¬·±²±º²»©®»·¼»²¬·¿´«²·¬©¸·½¸¿®»´·µ»´§¬±¾»½±²¬®«½¬»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿² ß®»¿ò λ°±²» ͱ³»²»©®»·¼»²¬·¿´«²·¬¿®»»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¾»½±²¬®«½¬»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ò 18 ݸ¿°¬»®ïïæß°°»²¼·¨ Û¨¸·¾·¬ßæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÞæÆ±²·²¹Ü·¬®·½¬Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÝæÝ»²«Þ±«²¼¿®·»Ó¿° Û¨¸·¾·¬ÜæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿°©·¬¸îðïðÛ¨°¿²·±²ß®»¿Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬»¼ Û¨¸·¾·¬ÛæÐ®±¶»½¬»¼Î»ª»²«»¿²¼Û¨°»²¼·¬«®»º±®¬¸»Ð´¿²ß®»¿ Û¨¸·¾·¬Úæ×³°¿½¬±ºË®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´±²¿²×²¼·ª·¼«¿´Ì¿¨Þ·´´ Û¨¸·¾·¬Ùæ×³°¿½¬±º¬¸»Ð´¿²±²Ñª»®´¿°°·²¹Ì¿¨·²¹Ö«®·¼·½¬·±² 19 Û¨¸·¾·¬ß¬Ð´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿° 20 Û¨¸·¾·¬Þ¬Æ±²·²¹Ü·¬®·½¬Ó¿° 21 Û¨¸·¾·¬Ý¬Ý»²«Þ±«²¼¿®·»Ó¿° 22 Û¨¸·¾·¬ÜæÐ´¿²ß®»¿Ó¿°©·¬¸îðïðÛ¨°¿²·±²ß®»¿Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬»¼ 23 Û¨¸·¾·¬Úæ×³°¿½¬±ºË®¾¿²Î»²»©¿´±²¿²×²¼·ª·¼«¿´Ì¿¨Þ·´´ Ì¿¾´»é Comparison of Tax Bill Before and After Urban Renewal Reallocation For Median Eugene Home in FY10 - 2009 Tax Year Taxes Before Taxes Billed Urban RenewalTaxes Directed to:After Urban Renewal ReallocationTaxing DistrictsDowntown URRiverfront URReallocationDifference School Taxes Eugene School District$752.39$739.20$9.79$3.39$739.20($13.18) Eugene School District LOL$237.67$236.61$0.00$1.06$236.61($1.06) Lane Community College$98.09$96.72$1.03$0.35$96.72($1.38) Lane ESD$35.37$34.87$0.36$0.13$34.87($0.49) $1,123.52$1,107.40$11.19$4.93$1,107.40($16.11) General Government Taxes City of Eugene$1,110.05$1,094.17$11.79$4.09$1,094.17($15.88) City of Eugene Library Levy$36.73$36.60$0.00$0.13$36.60($0.13) Lane County$202.70$199.82$2.14$0.74$199.82($2.88) $27.03 Eugene Downtown UR$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$27.03 $11.75 Eugene Riverfront UR$0.00$0.00$0.00$0.00$11.75 $1,349.48$1,330.59$13.93$4.96$1,369.37$19.90 Bonded Debt Taxes Lane County Bond$18.67$18.41$0.19$0.06$18.41($0.25) Eugene Bond I$52.08$51.35$0.54$0.19$51.35($0.73) Eugene Bond II$136.17$135.68$0.00$0.49$135.68($0.49) Eugene 4J Bond I$92.03$90.43$1.19$0.41$90.43($1.60) Eugene 4J Bond II$128.67$128.10$0.00$0.57$128.10($0.57) LCC Bond$37.12$37.00$0.00$0.13$37.00($0.13) $464.74$460.97$1.92$1.85$460.97($3.77) $27.03$11.74$0.01 Total Taxes$2,937.73$2,898.96$2,937.74 Source: Based on tax rates per the Lane County Assessor, Levy Child/Parent Detail Report, Tax Year 2009, TCA 00400 Assessed Value for Median Home in Eugene$158,447 Any slight differences of $0.01 are due to truncation and rounding. 24 EXHIBIT B: Property Analysis Report (4-5-10) Urban Renewal Amendment Documentation of Blighted Areas The tax lots within the existing area and proposed expansion area of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan District were evaluated in Fall 2009. A description and photos of each of the properties within the existing Urban Renewal Plan District and the proposed expansion area are provided below. Map identification numbers have been assigned to individual tax lots within the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan District Map (Attachment 1 to Exhibit B). Properties have been assessed for characteristics of “blight” as the term is defined per ORS 457.010(1). ORS 457.010(1) defines “Blighted areas” as those “that, by reason of deterioration, faulty planning, inadequate or improper facilities, deleterious land use or the existence of unsafe structures, or any combination of these factors, are detrimental to the safety, health or welfare of the community. A blighted area is characterized by the existence of one or more of the following conditions: (a) The existence of buildings and structures, used or intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial or other purposes, or any combination of those uses, that are unfit or unsafe to occupy for those purposes because of any one or a combination of the following conditions: (A) Defective design and quality of physical construction; (B) Faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing; (C) Overcrowding and a high density of population; (D) Inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces and recreation facilities; or (E) Obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses; (b) An economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of property resulting from faulty planning; (c) The division or subdivision and sale of property or lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size or dimensions for property usefulness and development; (d) The laying out of property or lots in disregard of contours, drainage and other physical characteristics of the terrain and surrounding conditions; (e) The existence of inadequate streets and other rights of way, open spaces and utilities; (f) The existence of property or lots or other areas that are subject to inundation by water; (g) A prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments and social and economic maladjustments to such an extent that the capacity to pay taxes is reduced and tax receipts are inadequate for the cost of public services rendered; (h) A growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas, resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare; or (i) A loss of population and reduction of proper utilization of the area, resulting in its further deterioration and added costs to the taxpayer for the creation of new public facilities and services elsewhere. A total of 152 properties are included with the existing District boundaries. The Blight Findings Matrix (Attachment 2 to Exhibit B) includes a row for each property, identified by Map ID number and tax lot number. The Matrix includes columns relating to each of the nine criteria at ORS 457.010(1) with five sub-criteria under (a). If a property was determined to meet a particular criterion from the definition/criteria at ORS 457.010(1), it is indicated on the Matrix and the basis for that determination is set out in this Property Analysis Report. The Matrix identifies each criterion met by a particular Ú·²¼·²¹ï property. In some cases, the Matrix indicates that a particular property does not meet any of the blight criteria. However, in many cases, a property meets more than one criterion. For a determination that a property is “blighted,” only one criterion need be met. The final column on the Blight Findings Matrix includes a “Y” or “N” to indicate whether the property has attributes that make it “blighted” under the definition/criteria at ORS 457.010(1). The determination of blight for a particular property is not an indication that that property is slated for improvement or for demolition, but an indication of the character of the area and substantiation of the need for reinvestment and improvement in the district. While not every individual property is blighted (some properties have improved due to urban renewal projects), taken as a whole, the City concludes that the urban renewal area is a blighted area. This conclusion is supported by substantial evidence, as discussed below. General Findings ORS 457.010(1)(a) The language in the statute that defines blight under ORS 457.010(1)(a) specifies that properties must be unfit or unsafe to occupy for their intended purposes due to one or more of the conditions listed in ORS 457.010(1)(a) (A – E). The statute does not elaborate on what “unfit” or “unsafe to occupy” means, nor does it state that the building must be literally unusable or uninhabitable. The City concludes that a building that meets the criteria under (A) – (E) evidences conditions that indicate that the structure is “unfit” for its intended purpose or “unsafe to occupy,” even if the building is in fact occupied and otherwise habitable. These conditions are described below. Information for buildings on individual tax lots was gathered primarily from visual surveys of the buildings’ exteriors and, in some cases, sources familiar with the entire edifice. ORS 457.010(1)(a)(A) Properties identified on the Blight Findings Matrix as meeting (a)(A) were determined to have structures that are unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy because of defective design and quality of physical construction. This was the case with the following publicly-owned properties in the current boundaries of the Urban Renewal District: 27, 45, 51, 84, 125, 143, 149, 150,151 and 152. These buildings were considered blighted per this criterion due to seismic concerns. Information on these buildings has been made available from City of Eugene Public Works, indicating that every public building built prior to 1998 is out of compliance with current seismic code requirements. While every private building built prior to 1998 is also likely out of compliance, it is possible that some of those structures would meet today’s code. Without a detailed inspection for each structure, in most cases it is not feasible to assess current seismic code compliance. ORS 457.010(1)(a)(B) None of the properties within the existing District or the proposed expansion area were determined to have structures that are unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy because of faulty interior arrangement and exterior spacing. ORS 457.010(1)(a)(C) None of the properties within the existing District or the proposed expansion area were determined to have structures that are unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy due to overcrowding and a high density of population. Ú·²¼·²¹î ORS 457.010(1)(a)(D) None of the properties within the existing District or the proposed expansion area were determined to have structures that are unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy due to inadequate provision for ventilation, light, sanitation, open spaces and recreation facilities. ORS 457.010(1)(a)(E) Properties identified on the Blight Findings Matrix as meeting (a)(E) were determined to have structures that are unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy because of obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses. The properties listed below were identified under (a)(E) due to obsolescence resulting from a dependency on steam (indicated in the property-specific findings, below).Steam dependency is a factor because the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) has begun plans to decommission their steam plant, requiring buildings on the steam system to convert to another heating source at their own expense. Buildings relying on steam therefore demonstrate a condition of obsolescence. This was the case with the following properties in the current boundaries of the Urban Renewal District: 5, 11, 20, 23, 24, 26, 27, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 61, 62, 65, 66, 75, 78, 79, 80, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 100, 102, 124, 125, 131, 132, 143, 145, 146, 149, 150, 151, and 152. This was also the case with Map ID # 153 in the proposed District expansion area. With respect to building conditions, each building has been given a rating in the property-specific findings below, based upon the following scale: + “” New, near new, or well-maintained older buildings ± “” Buildings needing rehabilitation (for visible damage or wear, structural cracks, seismic upgrading, water infiltration, etc.) and improved maintenance (for peeling exteriors, graffiti, broken windows, torn awnings, etc.); – “” Dilapidated buildings which appear to be beyond an ability to be economically rehabilitated A number of properties were identified under (a)(E) because they show deterioration or dilapidation. Properties that have buildings with a “±” or “–” rating exhibit conditions leading them to be unusable or uninhabitable, and were therefore found to be unfit for their intended purpose or unsafe to occupy because of obsolescence, deterioration, dilapidation, mixed character or shifting of uses. The following properties in the current boundaries of the Urban Renewal District exhibited the characteristics listed above: 1, 2, 6, 11, 14, 20, 23, 26, 27, 45, 48, 50, 51, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 69, 70, 71, 78, 80, 83, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 95, 97, 99, 100, 101, 121, 123, 125, 132, 143, 148 and 152. This was also the case with the following properties in the proposed District expansion area: 153, 155, 164 and 167. The specific conditions are indicated in the property-specific findings, below. ORS 457.010(1)(b) None of the properties in the current or proposed District boundaries are characterized by the existence of an economic dislocation, deterioration or disuse of property resulting from faulty planning. ORS 457.010(1)(c) Properties identified on the Blight Findings Matrix as meeting (c) were determined to be characterized by land divisions and sales that have resulted in lots of irregular form and shape and inadequate size or Ú·²¼·²¹í dimensions for property usefulness and development. This was the case with the following properties in the current boundaries of the Urban Renewal District: 70, 71 and 142. None of the properties in the proposed District expansion area are so characterized. ORS 457.010(1)(d) None of the properties in the current or proposed District boundaries are characterized by the existence of property or lot layouts in disregard of contours, drainage or other physical characteristics of the terrain and surrounding conditions. ORS 457.010(1)(e) None of the properties in the current or proposed District boundaries are characterized by the existence of inadequate streets and other rights of way, open spaces and utilities. ORS 457.010(1)(f) None of the properties within the current or proposed boundaries of the Urban Renewal District are characterized by the existence of property or lots or other areas that are subject to inundation by water. ORS 457.010(1)(g) Properties identified on the Blight Findings Matrix as meeting (g) were determined to be characterized by a prevalence of depreciated values, impaired investments and social and economic maladjustments to such an extent that the capacity to pay taxes is reduced and tax receipts are inadequate for the cost of public services rendered. These properties were determined to evidence depreciated values due to an analysis of the property’s improvement to land value ratio. Properties with a ratio of less than 4:1 were considered depreciated. This ratio was utilized based on a comparison of analyses completed by other communities in the state, including Springfield, Tillamook and Portland. Properties that are not intended to be developed, such as public open space or public plazas, are indicated as p/p, although any structures associated with those tax lots may be evaluated separately. Properties that are composed of multiple ownerships (such as condominium units were not considered for this analysis; for these cases, ) an indication of n/a is shown on the Blight Findings Matrix. For a very limited number of properties, adequate information was not available from the tax assessor’s office for this analysis; for these cases, i/i is indicated on the Blight Findings Matrix. Within the existing District boundaries, the following Map ID # met this criterion, : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 20, 23, 24, 25, 27, 45, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 71, 73, 75, 80, 81, 82, 83, 87, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 100, 108, 109, 112, 115, 116, 117, 118, 123, 124, 125, 127, 128, 129, 132, 133, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 146, 147, 148, 149, and 151. Information was not available for Map # 28, 29 and 70. Within the proposed expanded District boundary, Map ID # 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166 and 167 met this criterion. ORS 457.010(1)(h) Properties identified on the Blight Findings Matrix as meeting (h) were determined to be characterized by a growing or total lack of proper utilization of areas, resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to the public health, safety and welfare. This determination was based on a review of the building’s vacancy (such as empty storefronts) or site’s vacancy (such as undeveloped lots or surface parking lots). A property that has a 50% or higher vacancy was determined to meet criterion (h), indicating that potential utilization of the property is less than half its current utilization. Within the existing District boundaries, the following Map ID # met this criterion: 4, 5, 11, 12, 14, 15, 52, 53, 54, 55, 66, 67, 68, 73, 75, 81, 82, 84, 92, 93, 99, 101, 108, 109, 115, 116, 117, 118, 127, 128, 131, 135, 136, 138, 139, 140, and 144. This was also the case with the Ú·²¼·²¹ì following properties in the proposed District expansion area: 153, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 165,166 and 167. A comparison of the allowable development to the existing development is a further indication of the lack of proper utilization of the area and indication of blight per ORS 457.010(1)(h). Nearly all of the properties within the existing District and the properties proposed for inclusion into the District are zoned C-3 Major Commercial, with a maximum allowed height of 150 feet. Properties containing buildings having only a single-story (26 properties), as identified in the descriptions below, present further evidence of underutilization of the property in the commercial core of downtown. ORS 457.010(1)(i) None of the properties within the current or proposed boundaries of the Urban Renewal District are characterized by a loss of population and reduction of proper utilization of the area, resulting in its further deterioration and added costs to the taxpayer for the creation of new public facilities and services elsewhere. PROPERTIES WITHIN EXISTING DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN DISTRICT The following are property-specific findings substantiating the general findings, above. Map ID# 1 and 2 —Tax lots 11300 and 11200 of Map 17033114 (Firestone Tire):The building has cracks in the exterior walls, especially on the north side. The building is single-story use. Improvement to land ratio: 1.23 and .01; Building rating: ± Map ID# 3 and 4 —Tax lots 12000 and 11700 of Map 17033114 (Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union and DocuTrack Imaging): Single-story building. The building takes up approximately 1/3 of tax lot 117000; the remainder is surface parking and drive-thru access. Improvement to land ratio: 1.67 and .59; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹ë Map ID# 5 —Tax lot 12100 of Map 17033114 (Wachovia Securities, Beecher Carlson and Mediation Services): EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed for the property. Two-thirds of lot is surface parking. Improvement to land ratio: 1.23 and .01; Building rating: + Map ID# 6 —Tax lot 12800 of Map 17033114 (Lane Community College Downtown Center):Building shows some wear and lack of maintenance (peeling exterior, graffiti) LCC has announced plans to build a new downtown center and to vacate this building. Upper floors have very few windows. Improvement to land ratio: 8.3; Building rating: ± Map ID# 7 —Tax lot 12900 of Map 17033114 (small commercial businesses including The Tattoo Parlor, Emerald City Skates, The Pita Pit, and Willamette Street Market). Single-story building. One of the storefronts is currently vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 1.18; Building rating: + Map ID# 8 through 10 —Tax lots 2000, 2100, 2200 of Map 17033113 (LTD Eugene Bus Station): Also associated with Map ID #18, 19, 21, and 22. Bus station and related structures are in good condition. Old police substation in Map ID #10 is currently vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 1.93, 2.88 and 5.05; Ú·²¼·²¹ê Building rating: + Map ID# 11 —Tax lot 5900 of Map 17033113 (McAyeal’s and The Shoe Doctor): Structure evidences cracks in exterior walls, broken windows in the rear, loose debris, and graffiti. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Building is single-story and occupies approximately 50% of the tax lot, with the remainder used for surface parking. Improvement to land ratio: .88; Building rating: ± Map ID# 12 and 13 —Tax lots 6000 and 6100 of Map 17033113 (Kiva and associated parking lot): One tax lot is surface parking; the other contains the Kiva grocery store. The structure is single-story and appears in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: .04 and 1.08; Building rating: + Map ID# 14 and 15 —Tax lot 6200 and 6300 of Map 17033113 (Formerly the Health Spa): Tax lot 6200 contains a vacant commercial structure, covering less than 50% of the tax lot, with the remainder used for surface parking; tax lot 6300 is vacant and used as a surface parking lot. The predominantly single-story structure evidences structural cracks; makeshift doors; graffiti; inconsistent surface painting; stains on the structure due to defective downspouts; and signs of homeless use. Improvement to land ratio: .18 and .04; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹é Map ID# 16 —Tax lot 6400 of Map 17033113 (Andreason’s Cremation and Burial Services): The building appears to be in good condition and is fully-occupied with mixed-use residential and commercial.Improvement to land ratio: 4.07; Building rating: + Map ID# 17 —Tax Lot 6500 of Map 17033113 (Eugene Public Library): Library is in good condition and well maintained. Improvement to land ratio: 27.57; Building rating: + Map ID# 18, 19, 21, and 22 —Tax Lots 2300, 2400, 2500, and 1901 of Map 17033113 (LTD Eugene Bus Station): associated with Map ID #8, 9, and 10. Bus station and related structures are in good condition. Improved public plaza; Building rating: + Map ID# 20 —Tax lot 1700, Map 17033113 (Downtown Athletic Club - Newberry Childcare and offices): Old J.J. Newberry Co. building. Rust stains from tie-rods along the side of the building, eroding brick work, and peeling paint. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: .3.2; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹è Map ID# 23 —Tax lot 1900 of Map 17033113 (McDonald Theatre building and associated shops): Some visible cracks in walls (esp. on west side). EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 1.15; Building rating: ± Map ID# 24 —Tax lot 12700, Map 17033114 (Funk and Levis): notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 2.83; Building rating: + Map ID# 25 —Tax lot 12600 of Map 17033114 (Harlequin Beads): Building appears in good condition. Single-story use. Improvement to land ratio: 2.78; Building rating: + Map ID# 26 —Tax lot 12500 of Map 17033114 (Shaffer Building): Building appears in good condition overall but window frames deteriorating and paint peeling. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Third floor appears vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 9.14; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ç Map ID# 27Map ID# 45 —Tax lot 12300 of Map 17033114 (Overpark structure): Also associated with . Per City of Eugene Public Works, work required includes sealing exterior faces of walls, installing replacement deck coating, upgrading the elevator. Structure not compliant with current seismic code requirements. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Some vacancies evident. Improvement to land ratio: 2.73; Building rating: ± Map ID# 28 and 29 —Tax lots 11500 and 11600 of Map 17033114 (Qwest Building): Upper floors have very limited access to daylight, otherwise building is in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: No information available; Building rating: + Map ID# 30 —Tax lot 11400 of Map 17033114 (Pearl St. garage): Structure is in good condition and commercial spaces are fully-occupied. Improvement to land ratio: 6.92; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹ïð Map ID# 31 through 43 —Tax lots 7401 thru 7413 of Map 17033114 (Private garage/Brushfire Pottery): Structure appears in good condition; two commercial spaces are vacant. Improvement to land ratio: information on individual spaces not available; Building rating: + Map ID# 44 —Tax lot 6900 of Map 17033114 (Key Bank building): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 15.92; Building rating: + Map ID# 45Map ID# 27 —Tax lot 5800 of Map 17033114 (Overpark garage): Associated with . Per City of Eugene Public Works work required to repair and upgrade the structure includes sealing exterior faces of walls, installing replacement deck coating, upgrading the elevator. Structure is not compliant with current seismic code requirements. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Former Tiffany’s Drugs store space is vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 2.35; Building rating: ± Map ID# 46 and 47 —Tax lot 5600 and 5700 of Map 17033114 (DAC): Building appears in good condition. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 8.92 and 7.12; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹ïï Map ID# 48 —Tax lot 5500 of Map 17033114 (Shoe-a-Holic): Building evidences water damage on exterior, missing bricks, cracks in marble façade, graffiti, exposed external wiring. Recent upgrades completed to front façade only. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 2.06; Building rating: ± Map ID# 49 —Tax lot 1600 of Map 17033113 (Harry Ritchie’s Jewelers): Building appears in good condition. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 3.85; Building rating: + Map ID# 50 —Tax lot 1800 of Map 17033113 (Actor’s Cabaret of Eugene/Poppi’s Anatolia): Single- story building with cracking and missing downtown spouts and water damage, paint peeling. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: .97; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ïî Map ID# 51 —Tax lot 2600 of Map 17033113 (Atrium Building): Per City of Eugene Public Works improvements/maintenance needed on building include repair to skylights and elevator upgrade needed. Structure is not compliant with current seismic code requirements. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 4.52; Building rating: ± th Map ID# 52 through 55 —Tax lots 5100, 5200, 5300, and 6600 of Map 17033113 (10 and Charnelton Site): Surface parking lot and vacant subsurface lot. Improvement to land ratio: .04, .04, 07 and .00 Map ID# 56 through 59 —Tax lots 16200, 16400, 16600, and 16900 of Map 17033113 (Broadway Place - South): Also associated with Map ID# 103-107. Buildings in good condition. Corner space along Lincoln is vacant. Improvement to land ratio: Information on individual spaces not available; Building rating: + Map ID# 60 —Tax lot 6700 of Map 17033113 (Shawmed/Lord Leebrick). Single-story building in need of rehabilitation (painting, sealing, canopy repair). Poor access to daylight (no windows on west or south side). One empty storefront. Improvement to land ratio: .70; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ïí Map ID# 61 —Tax lot 4900 of Map 17033113 (Diva, etc.): Single-story building. Roofline repairs needed, awnings deteriorated or missing. One vacancy on western end. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 2.19; Building rating: ± Map ID# 62 —Tax lot 5000 of Map 17033113 (Bradford’s store): Single-story building in good condition. West portion of store is vacant (approximately one-third of structure). EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 1.18; Building rating: + Map ID# 63 —Tax lot 2700 of Map 17033113 (Imagine Hair Salon): Building in need of maintenance (paint peeling, siding pulling off in places). Improvement to land ratio: 3.6; Building rating: ± Map ID# 64 —Tax lot 2800 of Map 17033113 (Luckey’s): Single-story building. Awnings (glass and fabric) need cleaning, sealing and repair; window frames peeling and deteriorating. Improvement to land ratio: 2.09; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ïì Map ID# 65 —Tax lot 2900 of Map 17033113 (Washburne Building): Building has surface cracking and chipping. Awnings need repairs. One vacancy in building front. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 3.63; Building rating: ± Map ID# 66 —Tax lot 1300 of Map 17033113 (Center Court Building): Building in considerable disrepair, internally and externally. Needs major renovations to make it fit for occupancy. Building is currently completely vacant. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 1.17; Building rating: ± Map ID# 67 and 68 —Tax lot 1400 of Map 17033113 (subsurface lot- old Woolworth’s Building): Vacant development site. Improvement to land ratio: 0.0 Map ID# 69 through 71 —Tax lots 5400, 5300, 4800 of Map 17033114 (Persian Rugs & Imports/Farouz Salon): Irregular paint job in back, graffiti present. Map ID # 70 and 71 are inadequately Ú·²¼·²¹ïë sized parcels; 70 has no right-of-way access. Improvement to land ratio: 1.98 (#69), 1.25 (#71) (Inadequate information is available for #70); Building rating: ± Map ID# 72 —Tax lot 4801 of Map 17033114 (Kesey Square): Improved public plaza. Map ID# 73 —Tax lot 4900 of Map 17033114 (Formerly 20 East): Vacant single-story building, exterior in good shape. Improvement to land ratio: 3.17; Building rating: + Map ID# 74 —Tax lot 5200 of Map 17033114 (The Broadway Building- Café Maroc, Adams Place, Pacific University): Building in good condition. Rear commercial space vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 4.75; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹ïê Map ID# 75 —Tax lot 6200 of Map 17033114 (Summit Bank, other offices): Building in good condition. Vacancy along Broadway. Approximately 50% of lot is dedicated to parking. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 1.6; Building rating: + Map ID# 76 —Tax lot 6800 of Map 17033114 (Ulum Group): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 5.67; Building rating: + Map ID# 77 —Tax lot 6700 of Map 17033114 (La Follette Gallery): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 5.19; Building rating: + Map ID# 78 —Tax lot 6500 of Map 17033114 (Wells Fargo/Oak St. Speakeasy): Concrete shell of building has considerable staining, stucco peeling from upper levels. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 4.83. Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ïé Map ID# 79 —Tax lot 6600 of Map 17033114 (Passionflower/Pewter Rabbit/Eugene Professional Building): Appears in good condition. Recently remodeled. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 9.42; Building rating: + Map ID# 80 —Tax lot 7500 of Map 17033114 (Quackenbush Building and Ambrosia): Front of building in good condition; concrete in rear of structure recently sealed; brick work needs cleaning, repair and repointing. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed for Ambrosia portion. Improvement to land ratio: 3.62; Building rating: ± Map ID# 81 and 82 —Tax lot 7700 and 7600 of Map 17033113 (surface parking): Surface parking lot. Improvement to land ratio: .04 and .04 Map ID# 83 —Tax lot 2800 of Map 17033114 (Café Zenon and other shops): Single-story building. Some cracks in the west wall, and stucco peeling. Improvement to land ratio: 2.53; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹ïè Map ID# 84 —Tax lot 2700 of Map 17033114 (Formerly City of Eugene Public Works): Vacant building, for sale by City. In good condition, but not compliant with current seismic code requirements per City of Eugene Public Works. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 10.53; Building rating: + Map ID# 85 —Tax lot 2900 of Map 17033114 (Parkview Place): Building in good condition. Building occupies approximately 75% of lot, parking area accounts for remainder. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 7.75; Building rating: + Map ID# 86 —Tax lot 3300 of Map 17033114 (Wells Fargo Building) Building occupies approximately 75% of lot, parking area accounts for remainder. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 11.94; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹ïç Map ID# 87 —Tax lot 3900 of Map 17033114 (Oveissi/Rowell Brokaw Architects): Building in good condition. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 3.4; Building rating: + Map ID# 88 —Tax lot 4000 of Map 17033114 (Fenario Gallery): Back side of building has cracking/eroding bricks. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 5.24; Building rating: ± Map ID# 89 —Tax lot 4400 of Map 17033114 (LCOG building): Some ground floor vacancies. Brickwork in rear needs cleaning, repair and repointing. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 10.2; Building rating: ± Map ID# 90 and 91 —Tax lot 900 and 1000 of Map 17033113 (Scan Design): Exterior siding pulling from frame on the front of the building. Improvement to land ratio: 4.66 and 3.47; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹îð Map ID# 92 —Tax lot 1100 of Map 17033113 (Taco Time Building): Cracking, staining from downspouts, torn awning. Vacancy on corner of Broadway and Willamette. Graffiti on back of building. Improvement to land ratio: 1.33; Building rating: ± Map ID# 93 —Tax lot 3400 of Map 17033113 (vacant former gallery): Appears vacant. Single-story building with oxidizing roof, peeling exterior wall paint and substantial graffiti. Improvement to land ratio: 1.75; Building rating: ± Map ID# 94 —Tax lot 3300 of Map 17033113 (Lazar’s Bazaar): Recent cosmetic upgrades. Single-story building appears in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 3.66; Building rating: + Map ID# 95 —Tax lot 3200 of Map 17033113 (John Henry’s): Single-story building with peeling paint, graffiti on back. Improvement to land ratio: 1.93; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹îï Map ID# 96 —Tax lot 3100 of Map 17033113 (formerly Lazar’s Bazaar): Single-story building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 2.71; Building rating: + Map ID# 97 —Tax lot 3000 of Map 17033113 (Horsehead Bar): Single-story building. Roof repair and maintenance needed; brick work needs repair. Vacancy along Olive St. Improvement to land ratio: 0.59; Building rating: ± Map ID# 98 —Tax lot 4600 of Map 17033113 (Duvall Building-Law Offices): Recently remodeled and in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 3.45; Building rating: + Map ID# 99 —Tax lot 4700 of Map 17033113 (860 Olive St.): Vacant ground floor. Wood siding needs repair, paint peeling in places. Improvement to land ratio: 8.43; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹îî Map ID# 100 —Tax lot 4800 of Map 17033113 (Jameson’s/Glamour Girls & Guys): Paint peeling, marquee cracked, window boarded, water staining. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 2.10; Building rating: ± Map ID# 101 —Tax lot 4500 of Map 17033113 (former Symantec building): Vacant. Deteriorated awning/broken windows, entries boarded up. Improvement to land ratio: 4.97; Building rating: ± Map ID# 102 —Tax lot 6800 of Map 17033113 (Enterprise Call-Center/ISTE): Building in good condition, recently remodeled. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 5.45; Building rating: + Map ID# 103 through 107 —Tax lots 16100, 16300, 16500, 16700, 16800 of Map 17033113 (Broadway Place- North): Also associated with Map ID# 56-59. Buildings in good condition. One commercial space is vacant. Improvement to land ratio: Information not available; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹îí Map ID# 108 —Tax lot 6900 of Map 17033113 (vacant- surface parking): Large surface parking lot (private) occupying a full quarter-block. Improvement to land ratio: .06 Map ID# 109 —Tax lot 4200 of Map 17033113 (vacant- surface parking): Surface parking lot associated with Rogue Brewery and Starlight Lounge. Improvement to land ratio: .15 Map ID# 110 —Tax lot 4100 of Map 17033113 (SCS Building- Law Offices): Building appears in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 7.20; Building rating: + Map ID# 111 —Tax lot 4000 of Map 17033113 (KLCC): Building is in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 4.54; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹îì Map ID# 112 —Tax lot 3900 of Map 17033113 (Shoe Repair business/Full House Poker/Former Police th Auditor): Single-story building in good shape. Vacancy on corner of Olive and 8. Improvement to land ratio: 2.57; Building rating: + Map ID# 113 —Tax lot 4300 of Map 17033113 (Starlight Lounge): Single-story building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 4.10; Building rating: + Map ID# 114 —Tax lot 4400 of Map 17033113 (Eugene City Brewery): Single-story building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 4.30; Building rating: + Map ID# 115 through 118 —Tax lot 3800, 3700, 3600, and 3500 of Map 17033113 (surface parking lot): Large parking lot occupying a full quarter-block. Improvement to land ratio: .08 for each tax lot Ú·²¼·²¹îë Map ID# 119 —Tax lot 700 of Map 17033113 (US Bank Center): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: Building rating: + Map ID# 120 —Tax lot 4600 of Map 17033114 (Cascade Title Co.): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 12.46; Building rating: + Map ID# 121 —Tax lot 4700 of Map 17033114 (Park Blocks- South): Structures evidence cracking and paint peeling from canopy covering. Improved public plaza. Building rating: ± Map ID# 122 —Tax lot 9400 of Map 17033111 (Tiffany Building): In good condition. Improvement to Ú·²¼·²¹îê land ratio: 8.64; Building rating: + Map ID# 123 —Tax lot 9300 of Map 17033111 (US Tae Kwon Do College): Some deterioration of building (broken windows, cracks in structure on back side). Improvement to land ratio: 2.05 (Building ) rating: ± Map ID# 124 —Tax lot 9200 of Map 17033111 (Smeed Hotel Building): Appears in good condition. Fully-occupied. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 3.10; Building rating: + Map ID# 125Map ID# 143 —Tax lot 16801 of Map 17033112 (Parcade): Also associated with . Per City of Eugene Public Works, walls and parapet need sealing, deck coatings need replacement, cracks need to be sealed and seal along slab joints above ramps need to be resealed; not compliant with current seismic code requirements. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 1.89; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹îé Map ID# 126 —Tax lot 16100 of Map 17033112 (MJ Plaza/Mac Store): Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 4.81; Building rating: + Map ID# 127 and 128 —Tax lot 15900 and 16000 of Map 17033112 (vacant- surface parking): Large th surface parking lot (private) associated with MJ Plaza and occupying 1/8 of a block. Improvement to land ratio: .06 and .06 Map ID# 129Map IDs —Tax lot 15800 of Map 17033112 (M. Jacobs Furniture): Also associated with #141, 142 and 144. Building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 1.61; Building rating: + Map ID# 130 —Tax lot 15500 of Map 17033112 (Lane County Visitors Center): Building in good condition. Appears partially vacant. Improvement to land ratio: 5.25; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹îè Map ID# 131 —Tax lot 15300 of Map 17033112 (Eugene Symphony/Logic Tools?): Building in good condition. Upper floors appear vacant. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 4.53; Building rating: + Map ID# 132 —Tax lot 15400 of Map 17033112 (Brennar’s): Awning needs repair, paint peeling, exposed wood at top. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 2.10; Building rating: ± Map ID# 133 —Tax lot 14900 of Map 17033112 (Studio B/Brennar’s Green Living): Building appears in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: 2.73; Building rating: + Map ID# 134 —Tax lot 14800 of 17033112 (Cozmic Pizza/The Strand): Single-story building appears in good condition. Fully-occupied. Improvement to land ratio: 4.23; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹îç Map ID# 135 and 136 —Tax lots 14700 and 14600 of Map 17033112 (surface parking): Large surface th parking lot (private) occupying 1/8 of a block. Improvement to land ratio: .02 and .02 Map ID# 137 —Tax lot 15100 of Map 17033112 (Goodyear Tire): Single-story building in good condition. Improvement to land ratio: .71; Building rating: + Map ID# 138 —Tax lot 15200 of Map 17033112 (vacant- access drive and surface parking): Parking appears associated with Goodyear Tire store. Improvement to land ratio: .09 Map ID# 139 and 140 —Tax lots 15201 and 15202 of Map 17033112 (mostly vacant- surface parking/Dutch Bros.): Large surface parking lot occupying nearly a full quarter-block. Map ID# 139 has drive-thru coffee shop located on a portion of it. Improvement to land ratio: .14 and .09; Building rating: + Ú·²¼·²¹íð Map ID# 141 and 142 —Tax lots 15600 and 15602 of Map 17033112 (M. Jacobs Furniture): Also associated with Map ID# 129 and 144. Building in good condition and fully-occupied. Tax lot 15602 is substandard and located at the rear of the building. Improvement to land ratio: 1.46 and .06; Building rating: + Map ID# 143Map ID# 125 —Tax lot 16800 of Map 17033112 (Parcade): Also associated with . Per City of Eugene Public Works, walls and parapet need sealing, deck coatings need replacement, cracks need to be sealed and seal along slab joints above ramps need to be resealed; not compliant with current seismic code requirements. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio; 0.0; Building rating: ± Map ID# 144 —Tax lot 15601 of Map 17033112 (surface parking): Also associated with Map ID# 129, th 141, and 142. Surface parking lot associated with M. Jacobs occupies 1/8 of a block. Improvement to land ratio: .06 Map ID# 145 —Tax lot 9001 of Map 17033111 (Baden & Co.): Building in good condition. EWEB Ú·²¼·²¹íï notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 6.48; Building rating: + Map ID# 146 —Tax lot 9000 of Map 17033111 (Barber Shop/Attorney offices): Single-story building in good condition. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 3.50; Building rating: + Map ID# 147 —Tax lot 8800 of Map 17033111 (Rock n Rodeo): Single-story building. Surface parking occupies approximately 33% of lot. Improvement to land ratio: 1.18; Building rating: + Map ID# 148 —Tax lot 9500 of Map 17033111 (Butterfly Parking structure): Slightly above-grade parking structure. Visible concrete deterioration, chipping and staining. Improvement to land ratio: .08; Building rating: ± Ú·²¼·²¹íî Map ID# 149 and 151 —Tax lots 7600 and 7700 of Map 17033111 (Eugene Conference Center): EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Not compliant with current seismic code requirements per City of Eugene Public Works. Improvement to land ratio: 2.38 and 2.12; Building rating: + Map ID# 150 —Tax lot 7601 of Map 17033111 (Eugene Hilton): Building appears in good condition. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Not compliant with current seismic code requirements per City of Eugene Public Works. Improvement to land ratio: 14.37; Building rating: + Map ID# 152 —Tax lot 6400 of Map 17033112 (Hult Center and associated parking garage): Hult Center in good condition, elevator upgrade required for parking garage, not compliant with current seismic code requirements per City of Eugene Public Works. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 14.54; Building rating: ± PROPOSED EXPANSION AREA: The proposed expanded Plan area contains 15 tax lots. The Agency has undertaken an evaluation of these tax lots and finds evidence of blighting conditions as defined by ORS 457.010(1) to exist in all of these tax lots, or 100% of the expanded Plan area. Map ID# 153 —Tax lot 700 of Map 17033142 (Peace Health Clinic Site): The building on this tax lot is currently less than 50% occupied. Per information from Peace Health, the structure needs rehabilitation specifically in the areas of system upgrades, including new HVAC equipment, chillers, boilers, and Ú·²¼·²¹íí ductwork and asbestos abatement. EWEB notes that steam conversion is needed. Improvement to land ratio: 15.07; Building rating: ± Map ID# 154 —Tax lot 800 of Map 17033142 (Espresso PRN Café/Peace Health Optical, Gerontology offices): Single-story building appears in good condition and is currently fully-occupied. Improvement to land ratio: 2.71; Building rating: + Map ID# 155 —Tax lot 900 of Map 17033142 (Style Connection/Herbs): Single-story building has some structural issues (eroding walls, broken windows, makeshift doors). Improvement to land ratio: .98; Building rating: ± Map ID# 156 through 158 —Tax lots 1000, 1100, and 1200 of Map 17033142 (Peace Health Clinic surface parking lots): The tax lots are vacant and used for surface parking. Improvement to land ratio: .10, .08 and .11 Map ID# 159 through 163 —Tax lots 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, and 2000 of Map 17033142 (Peace Ú·²¼·²¹íì Health Clinic surface parking lots): The tax lots are vacant and used for surface parking. Improvement to land ratio: .11, .12, .08, .11 and .16 Map ID# 164 —Tax lot 2100 of Map 17033142 (Peace Health storage): Single-story building is used for storage. Cracks in wall, paint and stucco peeling, graffiti. Improvement to land ratio: .65; Building rating: ± Map ID# 165 through 167 —Tax lots 2200, 2300, and 2400 of Map 17033142 (Peace Health surface parking—East): Single-story structure on tax lot 2400 is vacant, with cracks in wall, exposed boards, broken foundation. Improvement to land ratio: .09, .09 and .05; Building rating: – Ú·²¼·²¹íë ܱ©²¬±©² Ë®¾¿² λ²»©¿´ д¿² Ü·¬®·½¬ Ó¿°æ Û¨·¬·²¹ ¿²¼ Ю±°±»¼ ß®»¿ ߬¬¿½¸³»²¬ ï ¬± ÛÈØ×Þ×Ì Þ 150 152 151 149 143 136 138 139 137 147 144 141 135 142 140 146 145 125 148 129 124 131127 134 133 130 126 132 123 128 122 110 112 111 120 108 115 117 118 119 121 113 109 116 114 98 89 90 104 99 84 103 102 91 101 97 96 95 93 100 88 94 107 86 105 85 9283 87 59 58 61 65 66 72 73 57 60 5678 82 74 7579 71 64 67 80 62 10677 70 69 63 68 76 81 52 49 48 32 34 53 55 20 47 41 373940 Text 51 45 44 43 42 3835 54 46 50 33 36 31 19 21 26 29 17 23 27 25 30 18 28 24 22 16 11 8 4 14 1 106 12 15 5 9 13 7 3 2 153 154 163 165 155 164 162 156 166 157 158 161 167 160 159 Downtown Urban Renewal District Additional Area ß»®·¿´ 豬±¹®¿°¸§æ îððè Ý·¬§ ±º Û«¹»²» д¿²²·²¹ ¿²¼ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ü»°¿®¬³»²¬ Taxlots in study area ݱ³³«²·¬§ Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Ü·ª··±² ß°®·´ ëô îðïð Ý¿«¬·±²æ ̸· ³¿° · ¾¿»¼ ±² ·³°®»½·» ±«®½» ¼¿¬¿ô «¾¶»½¬ ¬± ½¸¿²¹» ¿²¼ º±® ¹»²»®¿´ ®»º»®»²½» ±²´§ò ±ºÞ´·¹¸¬Ü»¬»®³·²¿¬·±² ²±¬»Ô±½¿¬·±² ±_Æ?ÈÁ »®ª·½»¿²¼º¿½·´·¬·»°«¾´·½²»©±º½®»¿¬·±² ¬¸»º±®¬¿¨°¿§»®¬¸»¬±½±¬¿¼¼»¼¿²¼¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±² º«®¬¸»®·¬·²®»«´¬·²¹¿®»¿ô¬¸»±º«¬·´·¦¿¬·±² °®±°»®±º®»¼«½¬·±²¿²¼°±°«´¿¬·±²±º´±ßø·÷ ±® ©»´º¿®»å¿²¼¿º»¬§¸»¿´¬¸ô°«¾´·½¬¸»¬±½±²¬®·¾«¬·²¹ º±®ª¿´«¿¾´»¿²¼«»º«´°±¬»²¬·¿´´§´¿²¼±º½±²¼·¬·±² «²°®±¼«½¬·ª»¿²¼¬¿¹²¿²¬¿·²®»«´¬·²¹¿®»¿ô ±º«¬·´·¦¿¬·±²°®±°»®±º´¿½µ¬±¬¿´±®¹®±©·²¹ßø¸÷ ®»²¼»®»¼å»®ª·½»°«¾´·½ ±º½±¬¬¸»º±®·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»¿®»®»½»·°¬¬¿¨¿²¼®»¼«½»¼ ·¬¿¨»°¿§¬±½¿°¿½·¬§¬¸»¬¸¿¬»¨¬»²¬¿²«½¸¬± ³¿´¿¼¶«¬³»²¬»½±²±³·½¿²¼±½·¿´¿²¼·²ª»¬³»²¬ ·³°¿·®»¼ª¿´«»ô¼»°®»½·¿¬»¼±º°®»ª¿´»²½»ßø¹÷ ©¿¬»®å¾§·²«²¼¿¬·±²¬±«¾¶»½¬¿®» ¬¸¿¬¿®»¿±¬¸»®±®´±¬±®°®±°»®¬§±º»¨·¬»²½»Ì¸»øº÷ «¬·´·¬·»å¿²¼°¿½»±°»²©¿§ô±º®·¹¸¬ ±¬¸»®¿²¼¬®»»¬·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»±º»¨·¬»²½»Ì¸»ø»÷ ½±²¼·¬·±²å«®®±«²¼·²¹¿²¼¬»®®¿·²¬¸» ±º½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¬·½°¸§·½¿´±¬¸»®¿²¼¼®¿·²¿¹»½±²¬±«®ô ±º¼·®»¹¿®¼·²´±¬±®°®±°»®¬§±º±«¬´¿§·²¹Ì¸»ø¼÷ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬å¿²¼«»º«´²»°®±°»®¬§º±®¼·³»²·±² ±®·¦»·²¿¼»¯«¿¬»¿²¼¸¿°»¿²¼º±®³·®®»¹«´¿®±º´±¬ ±®°®±°»®¬§±º¿´»¿²¼«¾¼·ª··±²±®¼·ª··±²Ì¸»ø½÷ °´¿²²·²¹åº¿«´¬§º®±³®»«´¬·²¹°®±°»®¬§ ±º¼·«»±®¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²¼·´±½¿¬·±²ô»½±²±³·½ß²ø¾÷ «»å±º¸·º¬·²¹ ±®½¸¿®¿½¬»®³·¨»¼¼·´¿°·¼¿¬·±²ô¼»¬»®·±®¿¬·±²ôѾ±´»½»²½»ôøÛ÷ ±®º¿½·´·¬·»å®»½®»¿¬·±²¿²¼°¿½» ±°»²¿²·¬¿¬·±²ô´·¹¸¬ôª»²¬·´¿¬·±²ôº±®°®±ª··±²×²¿¼»¯«¿¬»øÜ÷ °±°«´¿¬·±²å±º¼»²·¬§¸·¹¸¿¿²¼Ñª»®½®±©¼·²¹øÝ÷ °¿½·²¹å»¨¬»®·±®¿²¼¿®®¿²¹»³»²¬·²¬»®·±®Ú¿«´¬§øÞ÷ ½±²¬®«½¬·±²å°¸§·½¿´±º¯«¿´·¬§¿²¼¼»·¹²Ü»º»½¬·ª»øß÷ ½±²¼·¬·±²æ º±´´±©·²¹¬¸»±º½±³¾·²¿¬·±²¿±®±²»¿²§±º¾»½¿«» °«®°±»¬¸±»º±®±½½«°§¬±«²¿º»±®«²º·¬¿®»¬¸¿¬ «»ô¬¸±»±º½±³¾·²¿¬·±²¿²§±®°«®°±»ô±¬¸»®±® ·²¼«¬®·¿´½±³³»®½·¿´ô´·ª·²¹ôº±®«»¼¾»¬±·²¬»²¼»¼ ±®«»¼¬®«½¬«®»ô¿²¼¾«·´¼·²¹±º»¨·¬»²½»Ì¸»ø¿÷ Ì¿¨´±¬ ²«³¾»®×¼»²¬·º·½¿¬·±²Ó¿° ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈù ìÇÚÐÓÙåÊÓÈÈ×ÎùÍÏÏ×ÎÈ Attachment D Planning Commission DRAFT Minutes from March 29, 2010 NAME OF MEETING: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: March 29, 201009 TO: Kayre Axe RECORDED BY: Kimberly Young = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = R O U T I N G I N F O R M A T I O N 4/21/2010 ky Draft to staff (Date & Initials) M I N U T E S Eugene Planning Commission Sloat Room—The Atrium Building th 99 West 10 Avenue—Eugene, Oregon March 29, 2010 11:30 a.m. PRESENT: Heidi Bierle, Chair; Jeff Mills, Vice Chair; Randy Hledik, William Randall, Lisa Warnes, Jon Belcher, members; Planning Director Lisa Gardner; City Attorney Emily Jerome; Amanda Nobel Flannery, Teri Harding, Carolyn Weiss, Lydia McKinney, Eugene Planning Division; Gary McNeel, Public Works Department; Mike Sullivan, Community Develop- ment Division. ABSENT: Rich Duncan, commissioner. Ms. Bierle called the meeting of the Eugene Planning Commission to order. I. PUBLIC COMMENT George Brown reported that a Eugene City Council majority approved an amendment to the Downtown Plan that the commission would hear about later in the meeting. He anticipated the possibility the decision might be referred to the ballot. Mr. Brown said that the amendment would increase the plan’s spending cap to $8 million, which the council agreed to direct to Lane Community College (LCC) for its downtown campus. He indicated he supported the LCC project but opposed the use of Urban Renewal Agency (URA) funds and preferred to see the Downtown Plan sunset as scheduled on July 1, 2010. Mr. Brown noted that the project developer had later indicated to the LCC Board of Directors that the project was $8 million short, and he questioned how that gap would be filled given the City could not contribute more unless it rewrote the Downtown Plan. He thought that such revisions would encounter public opposition. Mr. Brown asked if the funding shortfall envisioned was for the instructional building and noted that the plan also called for a dorm. He requested the financial package for both buildings, and questioned whether LCC was going to do two separate projects. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Referring to paragraph 5 on page 3 of the minutes of December 8, 2009, Ms. Bierle said the remarks attributed to Dan Terrell were unclear and asked that the recording be checked. Mr. Hledik said he was absent on January 11 and would abstain from voting on the minutes from that meeting. . Mr. Mills, seconded by Mr. Belcher, moved to approve the minutes of January 11, January MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 1 25, and February 8, 2010, as submitted. The motion on the January 25 and February 8 minutes passed unanimously, 6:0, the motion on the January 11, 2010, minutes passed 5:1:0; Mr. Hledik abstaining from the vote as he was not present at the meeting. III. DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PROPOSED AMENDMENT UPDATE Ms. Nobel Flannery provided a PowerPoint presentation entitled Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendments, which included background on the City Council decision-making process that led to the proposal to fund four projects, the Lane Community College Downtown Campus, Veterans Administration (VA) Clinic, Farmers Market, and Downtown Safety Initiative. She provided details on each project. Ms. Nobel Flannery asked the commission to forward a recommendation on the amendment to the council. Ms. Bierle solicited commission questions. Mr. Hledik clarified with Ms. Nobel Flannery that staff proposed to use urban renewal funds to pay off the garage debt, and the Parking Fund could then dedicate those moneys to the General Fund. Responding to a question from Mr. Hledik, Ms. Nobel Flannery indicated the commission did not have to act on the findings. City Attorney Emily Jerome noted that findings were being prepared for the council, and those could be provided to the commission. At the request of Ms. Warnes, Mr. Nobel Flannery reviewed the membership of the Eugene Redevelopment Advisory Committee. Ms. Warnes posited that the Urban Renewal Fund held surplus moneys. Ms. Cutsogeorge said that staff had estimated the amount to be over-collected if the council did not amend the district, which was about $3.3 million. She indicated that information was shared with and known by the council. Ms. Warnes asked if that money could be used. Ms. Cutsogeorge said the City had to raise the maximum indebtedness amount to use the funds. Mike Sullivan indicated that if the plan was not amended, the moneys would be returned to the overlapping taxing jurisdictions, including the County, school districts, and the City itself. Ms. Nobel Flannery noted that the plan was amended in 2004 by the City Council to include activities other than the library. Responding to a question from Ms. Warnes about the impact on other services if the amendment were adopted, Ms. Cutsogeorge referred Ms. Warnes to the information provided in the packet. Ms. Nobel Flannery said in regard to the schools, the State offset the impact from urban renewal. She estimated that School District 4J could receive an additional $20,000 over two years, but the issue was complicated by the potential of compression. Mr. Sullivan concurred. He said compression could reduce that amount. Staff was still working on the calculations involved. Mr. Hledik noted the financial implications of other planning efforts and the advice the commission received that its purview did not extend to financial and fiscal impacts; because of that, he had been more focused on the projects in terms of their land use impacts and how they fit the goals and policies in the plan. He was MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 2 not comfortable entering into a review of the fiscal impacts, and recommended the commission limit its purview to the land use aspects. Ms. Gardner concurred that was the appropriate framework. Mr. Randall declared a potential conflict of interest because he had a client with an interest in another site that the VA clinic could locate on. He did not think that impacted his decision making. Mr. Mills referred to the expanded boundary area and acknowledged it was proposed to accommodate the VA Clinic. He asked how the group of properties in question were selected. Ms. Nobel Flannery indicated there was a single private property owner involved. Mr. Mills noted land assembly was an option and asked if that was why land assembly was included in the option. Ms. Nobel Flannery clarified that land assembly was included in the plan but no land assembly was proposed for the VA Clinic. City would buy the property. Mr. Sullivan clarified that the site in question was assembled by the Urban Renewal Agency. Mr. Belcher recollected hearing that were the VA Clinic not to locate on the site in question, it would be removed from the boundary and not included in the district. Ms. Nobel Flannery concurred. Mr. Belcher asked what happened to the property owned by LCC if the project did not go forward. Ms. Nobel Flannery said the money would not be spent but the property would still be in the district. Mr. Sullivan said the meeting referred to by Mr. Brown was a meeting in which the LCC Board of Directors received a feasibility report. The design was general and costs were based on that design. He anticipated that LCC would have the flexibility to change the design or get more money. Mr. Belcher, seconded by Mr. Mills, moved that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that it approve the recommended plan. Mr. Hledik reiterated his belief that the commission did not have the authority, responsibility, or knowledge to go into the financial details of the plan. He planned to vote against the proposed motion but said he supported the types of projects being contemplated in the plan. Mr. Belcher withdrew his motion with the consent of his second, Mr. Mills. Mr. Hledik, seconded by Mr. Belcher, moved that the Planning Commission recommend council approval of the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan based on the commis- sion’s review of the proposed new boundaries and the four new projects contemplated in the plan with respect to their consistency with the City’s land use policies. The motion does not include consideration of the financial aspects of the plan. Ms. Warnes said she supported downtown revitalization and the projects proposed, but not the support the urban renewal financing mechanism. For that reason, she would vote against the motion. The motion passed 5:1; Ms. Warnes voting no. IV. WALNUT STATION WORK SESSION Ms. McKinney provided the staff presentation on the Walnut Station Mixed Use Center (MUC), emphasiz- ing the draft nature of the plan included in the meeting materials. She referred the commission to the Walnut MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 3 Station Draft Form Based Code included in the packet and emphasized the form-based nature of the text, the height regulating plan, and the transportation element. She referred to a map of potential road improvements on page 10 and said staff was attempting to draft the code in a manner that created incentives for the development of the connections shown. She reviewed the reduction in parking and landscaping requirements proposed for the area. Ms. McKinney reviewed the design/review process, a Type II application process focused on design. She noted that some elements were drawn from the Fairmount Area Plan, the neighborhood refinement plan. Ms. McKinney reviewed the amendments being proposed. She said staff would provide draft findings to the commission on the date of the public hearing, April 20. She anticipated the commission deliberations would occur about three weeks later, and a council hearing was scheduled for June 21. That hearing would be proceeded by a council work session. Mr. Hledik commended the plan, saying that it took the City in a direction significantly different than the prescriptive code. He thought it had potential to create a harmonious new look along Franklin Boulevard. He asked the source of the code language. Ms. McKinney said staff relied heavily on other models but the majority of the work was done by scratch by the technical advisory committee, consultants, and staff. Mr. Hledik referred to the listed conditional uses and asked why the City would include any of them as conditional uses as opposed to prohibiting them outright. Ms. McKinney said the uses were currently permitted in C-2 with a conditional use permit, and the philosophy of the project was not to take away any current uses. She confirmed that a conditional use permit was required for structured parking over a certain height. Mr. Hledik determined from Ms. McKinney that structured parking was an outright permitted use. Mr. Mills commended Ms. McKinney’s work. He determined from Ms. McKinney that Fairmount Park would be rezoned to match its current Public Lands designation and use. Mr. Belcher asked if the plan included a provision to address bicycle traffic east of Walnut Street traveling th east. Ms. McKinney noted that 15 Avenue was a bicycle path connection that ended at Franklin Boule- vard. She said the plan did not include a proposal for any bicycle facilities on that side of Franklin Boulevard, although there were recommendations with regard to the bicycle east-west connection on the north side. She said one idea was to create a multi-modal path along the south side of the Millrace, but the proposal involved many properties and would be expensive to implement. That idea was retained as a recommendation, but staff was not requiring it in the plan. Staff was proposing a connection from where the path began to enter Garden Avenue, and the alignment for that connection would be determined in the Bicycle Master Plan update. Responding to a question from Mr. Belcher, Mr. Inerfeld indicated there were no current plans to improve the bicycling experience along Franklin Boulevard but there was a regional vision for a bicycle path along the river. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) was building a viaduct along the river that would accommodate that path. However, that path project was not yet funded or designed, so until it was completed bicyclists would still have to travel along the sidewalk along Franklin Boulevard. Mr. Belcher felt that was still challenging for bicyclists. Mr. Inerfled concurred. He noted the limited space available for the City to work with. He invited more conversation with Mr. Belcher. MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 4 Ms. Bierle asked what provision existed for covered bicycle parking to encourage year-round bicycling. Ms. McKinney said the existing code would govern that issue. She said staff proposed to increase the number of spaces as well as the number of covered spaces, but got feedback from TAC members that it would serve as a disincentive to development and was a fairness issue as well. Ms. Bierle asked how one would measure increased demand for covered bicycle parking. Ms. McKinney did not know. Ms. Bierle thought it would be nice if more such parking was available. Ms. McKinney said the commission could make that recom- mendation. Mr. Hledik referred to the 150’ right-of-way of Franklin Boulevard and recalled that the commission was promised a diagram to see how that impacted existing uses. Ms. McKinney recollected that staff had shared that with the commission in November and indicated she would send it out again. Mr. Hledik said that 10-1/2 foot wide travel lanes seemed skinny. Mr. McNeel acknowledged the standards for arterials was 11 feet but indicated the City had 10-1/2’ lane widths in other areas, such as on Agate Street, which was an arterial, and on segments of Hilyard and Patterson streets. Mr. Hledik expressed concern because of the fact that Franklin would still be a major street traveling through the area. He pointed out the sidewalks were wider than the street lanes. Mr. Hledik looked forward to public testimony on the topic. He asked if the proposed canopies were intended to cover the sidewalk on Franklin Boulevard. Ms. McKinney said that for a canopy to project over a right-of-way, one had to have an irrevocable permit. Where canopies were shown, they were depicted on private property. Mr. Hledik determined from Ms. McKinney that the right-of-way included the sidewalk. Mr. Hledik questioned how the reduction in parking standards compared to the standards recently adopted for the adjacent residential neighborhood to the south and west. He wanted to ensure that everyone had a full appreciation of what could happen so that issue did not come up again. Ms. McKinney did not characterize the neighbors as happy with the proposal but believed they were comfortable with the proposed parking reduction. There were still some concerns. She believed that if the City saw a lot of housing construction with inadequate parking the City would hear concerns expressed soon, and she hoped that the code would eb easy to review and amend. Ms. Harding indicated that there was no correlation with bedrooms in the MUC, so ratios would be significantly lower. Ms. Gardner suggested that the MUC differed from those areas in that it was located on an EmX route and there was an expectation residents would be less car-dependent. Mr. Hledik suggested students might opt to live in apartments in the MUC as well. Mr. Hledik asked if the City defined what a family was, as it spoke to the issue of the number of people living in a unit. He suggested staff might want to consider that issue. Mr. Mills agreed with Mr. Hledik that Franklin Boulevard was a major travel corridor with intermixed automobile and truck traffic. He was very concerned about the proposed lane reduction to 10-1/2 feet. Mr. Mills was also skeptical about the parking requirements given the high demand in the area. He suggested that it was wishful thinking to believe it would work. He pointed out the community did not know what it would actually experience when the arena was completed and more high-density residential development built. Mr. Randall commended the work of Ms. McKinney and expressed appreciation for the idea of a form based code as he believed it would help achieve more diversity in development. He thought the area in question a MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 5 good place to try the concepts out as he thought they would work there. Ms. Warnes shared the concerns about parking and street widths expressed by Mr. Hledik and Mr. Mills. Mr. Belcher said he supported a requirement for continuous awnings along the sidewalks to encourage walking in the rain. Responding to a question from Mr. Belcher, Ms. McKinney said there was a three-story maximum for th buildings along 15 Avenue and the Millrace, and that was illustrated in the section drawings. She referred him to page 8 of the Agenda Item Summary, which demonstrated Height Standard D. Mr. Belcher asked if page 22 of the Agenda Item Summary should be amended to make specific reference to the appeal process contemplated. Ms. McKinney agreed that might be beneficial. Responding to a question from Mr. Hledik about the illustrations showing the window coverage for upper floors, Ms. McKinney said she was assured the depiction represented a 25 percent coverage area, although she agreed the illustration appeared to show more coverage than that. Responding to a question from Mr. Hledik about façade articulation, Ms. McKinney indicated that there would be three percent building articulation every 100 feet for structures along the public right-of-way. A door would satisfy the requirement. She said that percentage was taken from the current code, and was triggered for large buildings over 50,000 square feet. Mr. Hledik hoped to hear more from architects about that requirement at the public hearing as he thought such articulation was critical to breaking up the mass that would otherwise exist. Ms. McKinney reported that the local chapter of the American Institute of Architects (AIA) was doing a “test run” of the code, and suggested the group could be asked to look at that question. Responding to a question from Ms. Warnes, Ms. McKinney said the building setbacks applied to the Millrace, which was a Goal 5 resource. Those setback requirements were already in effect, and were 40 feet from the top of bank and applied only to properties not developed. She reminded the commission that properties already developed to the edge of the Millrace did not have to comply with the setback, even if they redeveloped. V. ENVISION EUGENE UPDATE Ms. Weiss and Ms. Jerome provided the update. Ms. Weiss reviewed the timeline for Envision Eugene and described the scope of the public involvement process. She anticipated frequent check-ins with both the commission and council. Ms. Jerome discussed the legal requirements associated with the process as they related to Statewide Goals 9 (Economic Development), 10 (Housing), and 14 (Urbanization). She said Goal 14 mandated that the City must have sufficient land to accommodate 20 years of its needs for housing and employment within its Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). How a jurisdiction regulated the use of land determined the amount of land available. The City was obliged to prepare a housing needs analysis and an economic opportunities MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 6 analysis, and Eugene had done that through the Eugene Comprehensives Lands Assessment (ECLA), which provided demand numbers based on a 20-year population. Continuing, Ms. Jerome said the City must determine how much need it could accommodate within its current boundary based on current density regulations, and if was insufficient without changes to current regulations, it must look toward an expansion of the UGB. She said it appeared that Eugene would lack sufficient land to meet the 20-year demand, and suggested that it was likely the City would look at a combination of actions that included additional densification inside the current UGB as well as an expansion of the UGB. She said that Eugene had already done a great deal to encourage densification and she anticipated it would be more challenging for the commission to find new measures to increase density. However, staff was working on measures now. Ms. Jerome said that Envision Eugene was the community’s opportunity to decide how it wished to grow in the future and determine where expansion was necessary if that among the choices made. State law provided for the community to look at “efficiency measures” intended to increase densities, such as mandating small lots, providing for financial incentives, and allowing for changes in land use designations. She cautioned that the City must be able to demonstrate that the efficiency measures would work. She said many variables were involved, and some of the variables were quite technical. Ms. Jerome referred to the flow chart in the meeting packet, saying it would be triggered by the council’s acceptance of ECLA, and she could answer questions about it a future work session. Mr. Hledik asked if code changes would be needed. Ms. Jerome indicated it would depend on the efficiency measures that the City contemplated. For example, higher buildings to accommodate more density could require code amendments. Ms. Jerome said the City was in continual conversation with the State about what was necessary, and the process was evolving. Other Oregon communities, including Springfield and Bend, were going through the same process, and the City was following the processes in those communities for what it could learn. Mr. Randall asked if something like Walnut Station could have an impact on the amount of residential lands that were needed, if the community could assume the percentage of residential demand associated with the form-based code. Ms. Jerome suggested that Walnut Station could be considered an efficiency measure. Staff would quantify the impact and if it believed the MUC would increase overall densities, that would be accounted for. Mr. Hledik asked if opportunity siting could be a consideration in determining what direction the community went. Ms. Jerome said yes, depending on the timing involved Mr. Mills envisioned that opportunity siting was a potential efficiency measure, and he questioned how much of a number the City could assign to that given the criteria that must be addressed and the fact it must be lived with for 20 years. Ms. Gardner reiterated Ms. Jerome’s point that such measures could not be merely aspirational; their benefit must be demonstrated. She did not think the City could assign densities that were incompatible with the work it had done. She said the work would be challenging. Mr. Belcher asked what one did with a plan for mixed use centers but only a few had been implemented; did that force the council to establish those centers? Ms. Gardner observed that the City had been in recent discussion with the State on the topic and said she would get back to the commission with the results of that MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 7 discussion. Ms. Jerome added that staff was talking to the State to determine if a promise to do something could impact the numbers. She said that based on her reading of the law, the answer was probably not, but she had questions based on her observations of other jurisdictions. VI. ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF A. Other Items from Staff Ms. Gardner had no items. B. Other Items from Commission Mr. Mills provided an update on the work of the Historic Review Board, noting that members had expressed concern about the lack of meetings and the potential a listening session would be scheduled. He offered to share those communications. Ms. Bierle thanked Mr. Brown for attending the meeting and encouraged commissioners to be in touch with their councilor ‘buddies.’ Ms. Bierle said that the chairs of the Sustainability Commission and Planning Commission met to discuss how the two commissions could work together in the public process for Envision Eugene and about a working group to investigate the triple bottom line tool. Mr. Belcher asked about the committee to be formed to examine the EmX process. Ms. Bierle said that work on that was in process. Ms. Harding announced a commission opening on the UO/City of Eugene Liaison Committee. . The meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. (Recorded by Kimberly Young) MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 8 ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ÷ ðÛÎ×ùÍÇÎÈÃúùùåÊÓÈÈ×ÎùÍÏÏ×ÎÈ