Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 1: TransPlan and Metro Plan Amendments
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY June 17, 2010 TO: Eugene City Council, Springfield City Council, and Lane County Board of Commissioners FROM: Kurt Yeiter, Senior Transportation Planner, Eugene Public Works, Greg Mott, Planning Manager, City of Springfield, Celia Barry, Lane County Transportation Planning and Traffic Division Manager ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing for TransPlan and Metro Plan Amendments: TransPlan Planning Period to Reflect Previously Adopted Coordinated Population Forecasts and Removal of Completed Projects (Eugene file MA 09-1; Springfield file LRP2008-00014; Lane County file PA 095108) ISSUE STATEMENT: On June 17, 2010, the Eugene City Council, Springfield City Council, and Lane County Board of Commissioners will hold a public hearing on ordinances that take the following action: 1. Non-site specific text amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (TransPlan) to adjust the planning period from year 2015 to year 2027 to reflect actual slower growth rates since TransPlan’s adoption and to be consistent with the previously adopted Lane County coordinated population forecast. 2. Remove completed transportation projects from TransPlan’s project lists. 3. Non-site specific text amendments in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) needed to maintain consistency between TransPlan and the Metro Plan. The proposed ordinance and exhibits thereto are attached to this AIS as Attachment A. The Eugene and City Council may choose to take action immediately after the close of the hearing, but no action is necessary on this date. The County Board of Commissioners and Springfield City Council must wait for a second reading of the ordinance before taking action. BACKGROUND: On November 8, 2007, the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) adopted an update to the federally- required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). MPC’s update extended the RTP’s planning period to 2031, deleted projects that had been completed or un-funded, moved projects from the Illustrative Project List (beyond 20-years) to the Financially Constrained 20-Year Capital Investment Actions List, and made several other changes to proposed projects. MPC’s adoption of the updated RTP triggered a state Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) requirement that Eugene, Springfield and Lane County do one of the following by November 8, 2008: 1. Make findings that TransPlan is consistent with the RTP; or 2. Update TransPlan to be consistent with the RTP; or 3. Get approved by the state Land Conservation and Development Commission 1 of 5 (LCDC) a work plan for making TransPlan consistent with the RTP. Eugene, Springfield and Lane County concluded that they could not make a finding that TransPlan is consistent with the RTP, nor could they update TransPlan by November 7, 2008, to be consistent with the RTP. Accordingly, the three jurisdictions sought LCDC’s approval of a work plan. On October 16, 2008, LCDC approved with conditions the Regional Transportation Work Plan (“Work Plan”). The Work Plan represents a logical, coordinated, and programmatic approach for updating local and regional land use and transportation plans. The Work Plan requires as early, interim steps in the overall update process that the local jurisdictions amend TransPlan in the following ways: (1) delete transportation projects that have been completed; (2) delete the West Eugene Parkway; (3) move four ODOT projects from the Future list to the Financially Constrained list; and, (4) adjust TransPlan’s planning period to be better reflective of actual population. A copy of the Work Plan is attached to this agenda item summary as Attachment B. The shift of four ODOT projects from the Future projects list to the Financially Constrained list has been accomplished through a separate process. The removal of the West Eugene Parkway will be considered during development of the Eugene Transportation System Plan at a later date. Thus, this public hearing considers only deletion of the completed projects and adjustment of TransPlan’s planning period. The amendments to be considered during this hearing were considered by the three metro-area Planning Commissions in April, 2009. The three Planning Commissions recommended approval. When the amendment process started, the planning period adjustment utilized a population forecast based on the safe-harbor method. Following the completion of Lane County’s coordinated population forecasts, on September 1, 2009, the three Planning Commissions recommend that the TransPlan planning period amendments recommended for adoption in April, 2009, be adjusted to reflect the coordinated population numbers. On September 22, 2009, the two City Councils and the County Board of Commissioners unanimously voted “to establish a process for proposed transportation planning horizon amendments that allows new evidence at the governing body joint hearing and allows the governing bodies’ decision to be based on the new evidence as well as the evidentiary record created before the planning commissions.” No letters of public testimony have been received as of the time this report was written. Any additional written comments received after the preparation of this staff report will be provided at the public hearing for inclusion into the public record. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: 1. Project List Amendments: As noted above, when the Metropolitan Policy Commission (MPC) updated the federally-required RTP in November, 2007, among other amendments made to the RTP, MPC deleted projects that have been built. These completed projects should now be deleted from TransPlan. Since the Metro Plan incorporates by reference TransPlan’s project lists, the Metro Plan must also be “amended” to acknowledge the changes to the project lists that are contained in TransPlan. It is the intent of these amendments to only remove projects that have been completed, not projects that can be removed for other policy reasons. The three Planning Commissions recommend that any projects completed after their deliberation, but prior to this hearing, also be deleted at this time. The proposed project list amendments are set forth in Exhibit A to the ordinance (Attachment A to the AIS). 2. TransPlan Text Amendments: The region covered by TransPlan is the “TransPlan Study Area.” The TransPlan Study Area extends beyond the UGB and Metro Plan boundary and is used for transportation modeling purposes. TransPlan includes provisions for meeting the transportation demand 2 of 5 of a projected population of 296,500 in the TransPlan Study Area. When TransPlan was updated in 2001, it was anticipated that the TransPlan Study Area’s population would reach 296,500 in 2015. Based on the Lane County coordinated population forecast adopted in 2009, it is now anticipated that the TransPlan Study Area’s population will not reach 296,500 until year 2027. Since the transportation modeling for the TransPlan Study Area was based on a projected population of 296,500, TransPlan may be expected to guide regional and transportation system planning and development in the Transportation Study Area until year 2027. Accordingly, the proposed amendment updates TransPlan’s planning period to 2027. The coordinated population projections apply to the area inside the current Eugene-Springfield urban growth boundary. The proposed adjustment to TransPlan’s planning period assumes that there will be negligible growth within that portion of the TransPlan Study Area that is located outside the current Eugene-Springfield urban growth boundary. This assumption is consistent with the assumptions made at the time of TransPlan’s adoption in 2001. The question of whether a different assumption for that area should be made is a matter that can be addressed during the upcoming comprehensive land use and transportation planning processes. As noted above, LCDC’s Regional Transportation Work Plan requires an adjustment to TransPlan’s planning period to more accurately reflect the year that the plan’s study area will hit the projected population and to bring TransPlan’s planning period closer to the planning period of the federally- required RTP (2031). The proposed TransPlan amendments to reflect the year at which the planned population will be reached is an interim measure necessary to comply with the Work Plan and to more accurately reflect current conditions for the benefit of the agencies funding transportation projects. In accordance with the Work Plan, the jurisdictions are currently undertaking a comprehensive update to TransPlan to provide integrated land use and transportation strategies for a new 20-year planning period. The proposed amendments to TransPlan are set forth in Exhibit A to the Ordinance (Attachment A to this AIS). 3. Metro Plan Amendments: The goals and policies in TransPlan are contained in the Metro Plan Transportation Element and are part of the adopted Metro Plan. Also, TransPlan’s project lists and project maps are adopted by reference as part of the Metro Plan. Although the project lists are maintained in TransPlan and not physically contained in the Metro Plan, the Metro Plan needs to be amended to simultaneously incorporate changes to the project list resulting from the removal of completed projects. The amendments to TransPlan’s planning period require additional Metro Plan text amendments in order for the two documents to remain consistent. The proposed text amendments to the Metro Plan are set forth in Exhibit B to the Ordinance (Attachment A to this AIS). RELATED POLICIES: This matter is presented in response to a work plan approved by the Land Conservation and Development Commission. APPLICABLE CRITERIA: The Eugene and Springfield City Councils and the Lane County Board of Commissioners will address relevant approval criteria in reaching their decision on the proposed amendments. Criteria to be used to evaluate a TransPlan and Metro Plan text amendments are found in Springfield Development Code Chapter 5, Section 5.14-135( C )(1-2); Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3); and Lane County Code Section 12.225(2)(a) and (b) and reads as follows: 3 of 5 (a)The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and (b)Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. Testimony and evidence of those testifying should be directed toward the applicable criteria of the code, as described above. The final decision must be based on the required approval criteria. The decision will be to approve, approve with modifications, or deny the requested amendments. The decisions from all three Metro-area elected bodies must be the same in order for the amendments to become effective. The decisions can be made separately. OPTIONS: This is scheduled for a public hearing only. At the time of deliberations and action, the governing bodies may consider the following options: 1.Adopt the proposed ordinance; 2.Adopt the proposed ordinance with specific modifications; 3.Postpone ordinance adoption; or 4.Deny the proposed ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Option 1: Adopt the proposed ordinance. SUGGESTED MOTION: No action is required at this meeting. The Eugene City Council could take action immediately after the close of the hearing, but the Springfield City Council and County Board of Commissioners must wait for a second reading of the ordinance before taking action. If action is desired, the recommended motion is: “Move to adopt Ordinance No. ____, an ordinance amending TransPlan and the Metro Plan as set forth in Exhibits A and B of that ordinance, based on the findings of consistency set forth in Exhibit C of that ordinance.” ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Ordinance, with attached Exhibits A, B and C. ? Exhibit A – Amendments to TransPlan ? Exhibit B – Amendments to Metro Plan ? Exhibit C – Findings of Consistency Attachment B: LCDC Work Plan Attachment C: Calculations for TransPlan planning year Attachment D: Agenda Item Summary for Planning Commissions’ public hearing (April 7, 2009) Attachment E: Additional Information memorandum to Planning Commissions (April 7, 2009) Attachment F: Minutes of Planning Commission meeting (April 7, 2009) Attachment G: Memorandum to Planning Commissions (September 1, 2009) Attachment H: Memorandum to Eugene and Springfield City Councils, Lane County Board of Commissioners (September 11, 2009) Attachment I: Minutes of Planning Commission meeting (September 1, 2009) FOR MORE INFORMATION: 4 of 5 If you have further questions or need additional information, please call Kurt Yeiter, Transportation Planner, City of Eugene, at 541-682-8379 or by email at kurt.m.yeiter@ci.eugene.or.us Or Greg Mott, Planning Manager, City of Springfield: 541-726-3774, gmott@ci.springfield.or.us Or Celia Barry, Lane County Transportation Planning Manager: 541-682-3958, Celia.BARRY@CO.Lane.OR.US 5 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. _______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE- SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN (TRANSPLAN) TO ADJUST THE PLANNING PERIOD FROM YEAR 2015 TO YEAR 2027, TO REMOVE COMPLETED PROJECTS FROM THE PROJECT LISTS AND TO MAKE RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN. The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that : A. Chapter IV of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) sets forth procedures for amendment of the Metro Plan, which for Eugene are implemented by Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971. B. The Metro Plan identifies the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) as a special purpose or functional plan which forms the basis for the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and guides surface transportation improvements in the metropolitan area. C. The City Council adopted TransPlan by Ordinance No. 19385, enacted on April 28, 1986, which was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 19584, enacted on November 28, 1988, Ordinance No. 19857, enacted on June 8, 1992, Ordinance No. 19872, enacted on September 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 19887 enacted on November 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 20186 enacted on February 14, 2000, Ordinance No. 20234 enacted on September 10, 2001, Ordinance No. 20258 enacted on July 8, 2002, and Ordinance No. 20442 enacted on November 9, 2009, adopting a revised Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and adopting revisions to TransPlan. D. On November 8, 2007, the Metropolitan Policy Committee adopted an update to the federally-required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); the update included extending the RTP’s planning period to 2031 and deleting projects that had been completed or that were determined to be no longer needed. E. Following a public hearing on April 7 2009, the Eugene Planning Commission recommended to the Eugene City Council that TransPlan be amended to adjust the planning period from year 2015 to year 2024, to remove completed transportation projects from TransPlan’s project lists, and to make related amendments to the Metro Plan. On September 1, 2009, following Eugene, Springfield and Lane County’s adoption of coordinated population forecasts, the Eugene Planning Commission recommended to the Eugene City Council that the previously-recommended 2024 planning period be adjusted to reflect the newly adopted population numbers. F. On June 17, 2010, the City Council conducted a public hearing on these amendments, and is now ready to take action based upon the above recommendations and the evidence and testimony already in the record as well as the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearings held on adopting revisions to TransPlan and to the Metro Plan. G. Substantial evidence exists within the record that the proposal meets the requirements of Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 and the requirements of applicable state and local law as described in the findings adopted in support of this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. TransPlan, adopted by Ordinance No. 19385, enacted on April 28, 1986, and amended by Ordinance No. 19584, enacted on November 28, 1988, Ordinance No. 19857, enacted on June 8, 1992, Ordinance No. 19872, enacted on September 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 19887 enacted on November 9, 1992, Ordinance No. 20186 enacted on February 14, 2000, Ordinance No. 20234, enacted on September 10, 2001, Ordinance No. 20258 enacted on July 8, 2002, and Ordinance No. 20442 enacted on November 9, 2009, is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The revisions to the 20-Year Financially-Constrained Roadway Projects list included in Exhibit A are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of the Metro Plan, as required by Metro Plan Policy F-9, page III-F-7. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. Section 3 . The Metro Plan, Transportation Element, Chapter III, Section F, is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Council adopts the findings set forth in the attached Exhibit C in support of this action. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section 6 . Notwithstanding the provisions of the Eugene Charter of 2002, this Ordinance shall not become effective until the Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Springfield City Council have taken action identical to the action taken by the City of Eugene in Sections 1 - 3 of this ordinance. Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this _____________________________ _____________________________ City Recorder Mayor ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSPORTATION PLAN (TRANSPLAN) TO ADJUST THE PLANNING PERIOD FROM YEAR 2015 TO YEAR 2027; TO REMOVE COMPLETED PROJECTS FROM THE PROJECT LISTS; AND TO MAKE RELATED AMENDMENTS TO THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN;AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. The City Council of the City of Springfield finds that: WHEREAS, Chapter IV of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) sets forth procedures for amendment of the Metro Plan, which for Springfield are implemented by the provisions of Chapter 5 of the Springfield Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Metro Plan identifies the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) as a special purpose functional plan which forms the basis for the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and guides surface transportation improvements in the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the TransPlan serves the goals, objectives and policies of the Metro Plan by addressing a variety of transportation issues and includes project lists and maps identifying financially constrained roadway projects and future roadway projects; and WHEREAS, The City Council adopted TransPlan by Ordinance No. 5328, enacted on May 5, 1986, which was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 5470, enacted on April 3, 1989, Ordinance No. 5655, enacted on September 21, 1992, Ordinance No. 5959, enacted on March 6, 2000, Ordinance No. 5990 enacted on September 17, 2001, Ordinance No. 6022 enacted on July 15, 2002, and Ordinance No. 6240 enacted on April 6, 2009, adopting a revised Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and adopting revisions to TransPlan. WHEREAS, on November 8, 2007, the Metropolitan Policy Committee adopted an update to the federally-required Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); the update included extending the RTP’s planning period to 2031 and deleting projects that had been completed or that were determined to be no longer needed; and WHEREAS, following a public hearing on April 7 2009, the Springfield Planning Commission recommended to the Springfield City Council that TransPlan be amended to adjust the planning period from year 2015 to year 2024, to remove completed transportation projects from TransPlan’s project lists, and to make related amendments to the Metro Plan. On September 1, 2009, following Eugene, Springfield and Lane County’s adoption of coordinated population forecasts, the Springfield Planning Commission recommended to the Springfield City Council that the previously- recommended 2024 planning period be adjusted to reflect the newly adopted population numbers; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2010, the City Council conducted a public hearing on these amendments, and is now ready to take action based upon the above recommendations and the evidence and testimony already in the record as well as the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearings held on adopting revisions to TransPlan and to the Metro Plan; and WHEREAS, substantial evidence exists within the record that the proposal meets the requirements of Chapter 5 of the Springfield Development Code and the requirements of applicable state and local law as described in the findings adopted in support of this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, amendments of the project lists in TransPlan require simultaneous amendment of the same project lists in the Metro Plan as described by Policy F.9, Chapter III, of the Metro Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Springfield does ordain as follows: Section 1. TransPlan, adopted by Ordinance No. 5328, enacted on May 5, 1986, which was subsequently amended by Ordinance No. 5470, enacted on April 3, 1989, Ordinance No. 5655, enacted on September 21, 1992, Ordinance No. 5959, enacted on March 6, 2000, Ordinance No. 5990 enacted on September 17, 2001, Ordinance No. 6022 enacted on July 15, 2002, and Ordinance No. 6240 enacted on April 6, 2009 is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit A attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The revisions to the 20-Year Financially-Constrained Roadway Projects list included in Exhibit A are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of the Metro Plan, as required by Metro Plan Policy F-9, page III-F-7. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. Section 3 . The Metro Plan, Transportation Element, Chapter III, Section F, is hereby amended as set forth in Exhibit B attached and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. The City Council adopts the findings set forth in the attached Exhibit C in support of this action. Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. Section 6 : Notwithstanding the effective date of ordinances as provided by Section 2.110 of the Springfield Municipal Code 1997, this Ordinance shall become effective upon the date that all of the following have occurred: (a) the ordinance has been acknowledged as provided by ORS 197.625; (b) at least 30 days have passed since the date the ordinance was approved; and (c) both the Eugene City Council and the Lane County Board of Commissioners have adopted ordinances containing identical provisions to those described in Sections 1-3 of this Ordinance. Adopted by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this _____ day of ___________, 2010 by a vote of _____ in favor _____ against. Approved by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this _____ day of ___________, 2010. _______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ City Recorder Exhibit B F. Transportation Element The Transportation Element addresses surface and air transportation in the metropolitan area. TransPlan, the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan, provides the basis for the surface transportation portions of this element and the Eugene Airport Master Plan provides the basis for the air transportation portions. to serve TransPlan guides regional transportation system planning in the metropolitan area [for a a 20-year period and serves] the transportation planning needs of [the] projected population of The TransPlan Study Area is an area extending 296,500 in the TransPlan Study Area (fn 11). 1 beyond the UGB and Metro Plan boundary that is used for transportation modeling purposes. TransPlan establishes the framework upon which all public agencies can make consistent and coordinated transportation planning decisions. Goals and policies in TransPlan are contained in this Transportation Element and are part of the adopted Metro Plan. TransPlan project lists and project maps are also adopted as part of the Metro Plan. This element complies with State Transportation Goal 12, “To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system.” Three types of transportation planning strategies are reflected in the goals and policies in this element: Transportation demand management (TDM), land use, and system improvements. TDM strategies focus on reducing demands placed on the transportation system, and thus system costs, by providing incentives to redistribute or eliminate vehicle trips and by encouraging alternative modes. Land use strategies focus on encouraging development patterns that reduce the need for automobiles, reduce trip lengths, and support the use of alternative modes. System improvements focus on increasing efficiency and adding capacity or new facilities to the existing highway, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Together, these strategies form a balanced policy framework for meeting local and state transportation goals to: increase urban public transit ridership; reduce reliance on the automobile; substitute automobile trips with alternative modes, such as walking and biking; and reduce automobile energy consumption and transportation costs. Consistent with this approach, the policies in this element are presented in the following categories: Not all Transportation Element policies will apply to a specific transportation-related decision. When conformance with adopted policy is required, policies in this and other Metro Plan elements will be examined to determine which policies are relevant and can be applied. When policies support varying positions, decision makers will seek a balance of all applicable policies. Goals are timeless, but some policies will expire as they are implemented. Goals 1. Provide an integrated transportation and land use system that supports choices in modes of travel and development patterns that will reduce reliance on the automobile and enhance livability, economic opportunity, and the quality of life. [Fn 11: The TransPlan Study Area is an area used for transportation modeling purposes. The 296,500 projected population for this area includes the estimated 2015 population of 286,000 for the UGB plus an additional 10,5000 projected population for the Transportation Analysis Zones that extend beyond the UGB.] Transportation Demand Management Findings st 14. TDM addresses federal Transportation Equity Act for the 21 Century (TEA 21) and state TPR requirements to reduce reliance on the automobile, thus helping to postpone the need for expensive capital improvements. The need for TDM stems from an increasing demand for and a constrained supply of road capacity, created by the combined effects of an accelerated rate of population growth (41% projected increase from 1995 to [2015] 2027 ) and increasing highway construction costs; for example, the City of Eugene increased the transportation systems development charge by a total of 15 percent to account for inflation from 1993-1996. Exhibit C FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY Metro Plan Amendment Criteria Criteria to be used to evaluate amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (TransPlan) and the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) are found in Springfield Development Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.14-135( C )(1-2), Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3), and Lane Code Section 12.225(2)(a) &(b) and all reads as follows: (a)The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and (b)Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. This application involves text amendments (non-site specific) and project list amendments to TransPlan, a special purpose functional plan, and text amendments (non-site specific) to the Metro Plan (hereinafter referred to as “the amendments”). The process for making the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan are identical; requiring that the three jurisdictions follow the “Type I” amendment process. To become effective, the amendments to TransPlan the Metro Plan must be approved by all three governing bodies. Criterion A. STATEWIDE PLANNING GOAL CONSISTENCY: Based on the findings set forth below, the amendments are consistent with applicable Statewide Planning Goals and interpretive rules. GOAL 1 - CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The Cities of Springfield and Eugene and Lane County have acknowledged citizen involvement programs and acknowledged processes for securing citizen input on all proposed Metro Plan amendments. The governing bodies code provisions require that notice of the proposed amendments be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption. Notification of the proposed amendments and opportunities for public participation in these amendments were consistent with the acknowledged citizen involvement programs. The governing bodies’ code provisions implement Statewide Planning Goal 1 by requiring that notice of the proposed land use code amendment be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption. Consideration of the amendments will begin with a joint Planning Commission work session on April 7, 2009, followed by a public hearing. On October 16, 2008, the City of Springfield provided notice of the proposed amendment to the 20-year planning period in TransPlan from 2015 to 2023 to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). That notice included copies of the proposal previously approved by the Metropolitan Policy Committee for inclusion in the federal RTP in November, 2007, and a copy of the report that went to the Springfield City Council for the October 6, 2008, initiation of this amendment. The identical proposal was reviewed and approved by the Joint Elected Officials of Eugene, Springfield 1 and Lane County on September 15, 2008, prior to being submitted to the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in October as part of the proposed work program for the update of TransPlan. Each of these and activities and meetings were noticed and included opportunities for citizen involvement and comment. The October 2008 DLCD notice was revised on January 29, 2009, to add the proposed removal of the completed projects, and to clarify that Metro Plan amendments were also necessary, and that Eugene and Lane County would be participants as well. The DLCD notice was revised again on February 6, 2009, to provide specific proposed text amendments and to provide the new (postponed) date for the first evidentiary hearing. Notice of the first evidentiary hearing was mailed to all persons who had requested such notice on March 6, 2009, thirty (30) days prior to the first hearing. Notice was published in the Register Guard, the area’s general circulation newspaper, on March 18, 2009, twenty (20) days before the first hearing. The proposed amendments were available for inspection at the Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County planning offices. The process leading up to the adoption of the amendments provided numerous opportunities for public involvement. We find that the process for adopting these amendments complies with Statewide Planning Goal 1 since it complies with, and surpasses, the requirements of the State’s citizen involvement provisions. GOAL 2 - LAND USE PLANNING: To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and actions related to the use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) is the policy tool that provides a basis for decision-making in this area. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the State in 1982 to be in compliance with statewide planning goals. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) is a function plan of the Metro Plan, which forms the basis for the Transportation Element of the Metro Plan and guides surface transportation improvements in the metropolitan area. TranPlan was acknowledged by the State to be in compliance with statewide planning goal. These findings and the record show that there is an adequate factual base for City’s decision concerning the amendments. Goal 2 requires that plans be coordinated with the plans of affected governmental units and that opportunities be provided for review and comment by affected governmental units. The Goal 2 coordination requirement is met when the adopting governmental bodies engage in an exchange, or invite such an exchange, between the adopting bodies and any affected governmental unit and when the adopting bodies use the information obtained in the exchange to balance the needs of the citizens. To comply with the Goal 2 coordination requirement, the three jurisdictions coordinated the review of these amendments with all affected governmental units. Notice of the proposed amendments and information about where the materials would be available for review was mailed to all parties that had requested such notice. There are no Goal 2 exceptions required for the amendments. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2. GOAL 3 - AGRICULTURAL LANDS: To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 2 The amendments will not change or conflict with the policies of the Metro Plan or TransPlan regarding agricultural lands since these amendments continue to reflect the growth planned for and accommodated by the existing, acknowledged Metro Plan and TransPlan. Goal 3 is not relevant and the amendments do not affect the area’s compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 3. GOAL 4 - FOREST LAND: To conserve forest lands for forest use. The amendments will not change any policies or plan diagram designations of the Metro Plan or TransPlan, nor do the amendments impact any forest lands. Goal 4 is not relevant and the amendments do not affect the area’s compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 4. Therefore, the amendments comply with Goal 4. GOAL 5 - OPEN SPACE, SCENIC AND HISTORIC AREAS, NATURAL RESOURCES: To conserve open space and protect natural and scenic resources. The following administrative rule (OAR 660-023-0250) is applicable to this post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) request: (3) Local governments are not required to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a PAPA unless the PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. For purposes of this section, a PAPA would affect a Goal 5 resource only if: (a) The PAPA creates or amends a resource list or a portion of an acknowledged plan or land use regulation adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5; (b) The PAPA allows new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular significant Goal 5 resource site on an acknowledged resource list; or (c) The PAPA amends an acknowledged UGB and factual information is submitted demonstrating that a resource site, or the impact areas of such a site, is included in the amended UGB area. The amendments do not affect a Goal 5 resource. Specifically, the amendments do not create or amend a list of Goal 5 resources, do not amend a plan or code provision adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5, do not allow new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular Goal 5 resource site, and do not amend the acknowledged Urban Growth Boundary. Therefore, Goal 5 does not apply to these plan amendments. GOAL 6 - AIR, WATER, AND LAND RESOURCES QUALITY: To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. Goal 6 addresses waste and process discharges from development, and is aimed at protecting air, water and land from impacts of those discharges. TransPlan currently contains policies related to nodal development, transportation demand management and the encouragement of additional alternative modes of transportation, including transit, bicycles and pedestrian use. These policies are related to the need to maintain and improve the air quality in the metropolitan area. The amendments will not impact any of these policies and no new projects are proposed; the project list amendments consist only of deleting completed projects. Projects already identified in TransPlan will be designed 3 and constructed in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local regulations. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 6. GOAL 7 - AREAS SUBJECT TO NATURAL HAZARDS: To protect life and property from natural disasters and hazards. Goal 7 requires that local government planning programs include provisions to protect people and property from natural hazards such as land slides. The amendments do not address potential natural disasters. Further, the amendments do not affect the current restrictions on development in areas subject to natural hazards, nor allow for new development that could result in a natural hazard. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 7. GOAL 8 - RECREATIONAL NEEDS: To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destinations resorts. Goal 8 ensures the provision of recreation facilities to Oregon citizens and is primarily concerned with the provisions of those facilities in non-urban areas of the State. The amendments do not affect the current provisions for recreation areas, facilities or recreational opportunities, nor will the amendments affect access to existing or future recreational facilities. Further, the amendments do not change the Metro Plan and TranPlan policies that support access to recreational facilities with the Metropolitan area and to recreations opportunities outside the area or delete any planned transportation projects that would make recreational facilities more available. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 8. GOAL 9 - ECONOMY OF THE STATE: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. The amendments will not impact the supply of industrial or commercial lands and will not change or conflict with the economic policies of Metro Plan. The amendments do not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan policies directed toward enhancing the economic opportunity available within the Eugene- Springfield area by assuring adequate public facilities and infrastructure to provide a transportation system that is efficient, safe, interconnected and economically viable and fiscally stable. Additionally, the amendments do not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan policies related to the movement of goods; those policies adopted to further the goal of using the public facilities infrastructure to support responsible economic development. The Oregon Transportation Plan recognizes that goods movement of all types makes a significant contribution to the region’s economy and wealth and contributes to residents’ quality of life. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 9. GOAL 10 – HOUSING: To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the state. The amendments will not impact the supply or residential lands and will not result in any change or conflict with the housing policies of the Metro Plan. Additionally, the amendments will not change any of the policies in TransPlan and the Metro Plan related to nodal development and transit-supportive land use patterns and development; those policies adopted to expand housing opportunities for the region’s citizens. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 10. 4 GOAL 11 - PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. The Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area has an acknowledged Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The amendments will not result in any change or conflict with the PFSP. GOAL 12 – TRANSPORTATION: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0000, et seq. The proposed amendments are consistent with all applicable provisions of OAR 660-012-0016. Further, the amendments are consistent with, and required by, the Regional Transportation Work Plan approved pursuant to OAR 660-012-0016(2)(b) by the Land Conservation and Development Commission on October 16, 2008. The TPR states that when amendments to a functional plan would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility the local government shall put in place measures to assure that the allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity and performance standards (level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. Adoption of the amendments will not significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 12. GOAL 13 - ENERGY CONSERVATION: To conserve energy. The Energy Goal is a general planning goal that calls for land and uses developed on the land to be managed and controlled so as to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy, based upon sound economic principles. The proposed amendments will not change the Metro Plan or TransPlan provisions related to promoting more compact development, encouraging the use of alternate modes of transportation and providing a transportation system design to increase the efficiency of travel wherever possible. Therefore, the amendments are consistent with Goal 13. GOAL 14 – URBANIZATION: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use. The amendments will not change the TransPlan and Metro Plan provisions adopted to preserve the distinction between urban and rural uses through the development of policies and programs that provide for more efficient urban uses within the UGB, thus preserving rural lands for rural uses. Accordingly, the amendments comply with Goal 14. GOAL 15 - WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway. The Willamette River Greenway area with the Urban Growth Boundary is governed by existing local provisions that have been acknowledged as complying with Goal 15. Those provisions will be unchanged 5 by the amendments. The amendments will not change TransPlan’s and the Metro Plan’s provisions related to the protection and maintenance of the scenic, historical, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River. Further, the amendments will not affect TransPlan’s and the Metro Plan’s compliance with Goal 15. Therefore, the amendments comply with Goal 15. GOALS 16-19 – COASTAL GOALSEstuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelines, Beaches and : ( Dunes, and Ocean Resources) There are no estuarine resources, shorelines, beaches, dunes, or ocean resources located within the Metro Plan or TransPlan boundary. Accordingly, Goals 16, 17, 18, and 19 are not applicable. Criterion B. Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. TransPlan guides regional transportation system planning and development in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. The region covered by TransPlan is the “TransPlan Study Area”, which is an area extending beyond the UGB and Metro Plan boundary that is used for transportation modeling purposes. TransPlan includes provisions for meeting the transportation demand of a projected population of 296,500 in the TransPlan Study Area. When TransPlan was updated in 2001, it was anticipated that the TransPlan Study Area’s population would reach 296,500 in 2015. It is now anticipated that the TransPlan Study Area’s population will not reach 296,500 until approximately 2027. Since the transportation modeling for the TransPlan Study Area was based on a projected population of 296,500, TransPlan guides regional and transportation system planning and development in the Transportation Study Area until 2027. The proposed amendments to the Metro Plan and TransPlan will not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. While the proposed TransPlan amendments necessitate that the text of the Metro Plan’s Transportation Element be amended to ensure internal consistency of the Metro Plan; these needed Metro Plan text amendments are proposed along with the TransPlan amendments. Together, the proposed amendments to the Metro Plan and to TransPlan are consistent with each other and the other provisions of the Metro Plan. Additionally, the amendments are consistent with applicable Metro Plan findings and policies; specific findings and policies being discussed below. B. Economic Element B.18 Encourage the development of transportation facilities which would improve access to industrial and commercial areas and improve freight movement capabilities by implementing the policies and projects in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan (TransPlan) and the Eugene Airport Master Plan. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy B.18. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s project lists identify the following transportations projects as having been completed: Jasper Road Extension, Project No. 66 (Construct 4-lane arterial); Pioneer Parkway Extension, Project No. 768 (Construct 4-5 lane minor arterial); Beltline Highway, Project No. 409 (Widening to 4 lanes, construction of Roosevelt extension). F. Transportation Element 6 F.4 Require improvements that encourage transit, bicycles, and pedestrians in new commercial, public, mixed use, and multi-unit residential development. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.4. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s project lists identify the following transit, pedestrian and bicycle projects as having been completed: Expansion of Glenwood [Bus] Operating Base, Project 1320 (expansion of existing operation and maintenance); Autzen Stadium, Project No. 1140 (construction of transfer station and park-and-ride lot); th LCC Station Expansion, Project No. 1125 (expansion of LCC station); 11 and Beltline Station, Project No. 1340 (construction of transfer station); Gateway and Beltline Station, Project No. 1350 (construction nd of transfer station); Springfield Station, Project No. 1355 (construction of new transit station); 42 Street Pathway, Project No. 795 (multi-use path); East Bank Trail, Project No. 641 (multi-use path); Fern Ridge Path #2, Project No. 423 (multi-use path); Garden Way/Knickerbocker Bridge Connector, Project No. 660 (multi-use path); Oakway Road to Coburg Road, Project No. 678 (route, multi-use path). F.9 Adopt by reference, as part of the Metro Plan, the 20-Year Capital Investment Actions project lists contained in TransPlan. Project timing and estimated costs are not adopted as policy. The proposed amendments to the project lists contained in TransPlan will be adopted by reference into the Metro Plan, demonstrating consistency with this policy. F.18 Improve transit service and facilities to increase the system’s accessibility, attractiveness, and convenience for all users, include the transportation disadvantaged population. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.18. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s project lists identify the following transit projects as having been completed: Expansion of Glenwood Operating Base, Project 1320 (expansion of existing operation and maintenance); Autzen Stadium, Project No. 1140 (construction of transfer station and park-and-ride lot); LCC Station Expansion, Project No. th 1125 (expansion of LCC station); 11 and Beltline Station, Project No. 1340 (construction of transfer station); Gateway and Beltline Station, Project No. 1350 (construction of transfer station); Springfield Station, Project No. 1355 (construction of new transit station) F.21 Expand the Park-and-Ride system within the metropolitan area and nearby communities. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.21. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s project lists identify the following park-and-ride project as having been completed: Autzen Stadium, Project No. 1140 (construction of transfer station and park-and-ride lot). F.22 Construct and improve the region’s bikeway system and provide bicycle system support facilities for both new development and redevelopment/expansion. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.22. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s nd project lists identify the following bicycle projects as having been completed: 42 Street Pathway, Project No. 795 (multi-use path); East Bank Trail, Project No. 641 (multi-use path); Fern Ridge Path #2, 7 Project No. 423 (multi-use path); Garden Way/Knickerbocker Bridge Connector, Project No. 660 (multi- use path); Oakway Road to Coburg Road, Project No. 678 (route, multi-use path). F.26 Provide for a pedestrian environment that is well integrated with adjacent land uses and is designed to enhance the safety, comfort, and convenience of walking. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.26. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s nd project lists identify the following pedestrian and bicycle projects as having been completed: 42 Street Pathway, Project No. 795 (multi-use path); East Bank Trail, Project No. 641 (multi-use path); Fern Ridge Path #2, Project No. 423 (multi-use path); Garden Way/Knickerbocker Bridge Connector, Project No. 660 (multi-use path); Oakway Road to Coburg Road, Project No. 678 (route, multi-use path). F.27 Provide for a continuous pedestrian network with reasonably direct travel routes between destination points. The amendments to TransPlan’s project lists, which delete transportation projects that have been constructed, demonstrate consistency with Policy F.27. Specifically, the deletions from TransPlan’s nd project lists identify the following pedestrian projects as having been completed: 42 Street Pathway, Project No. 795 (multi-use path); East Bank Trail, Project No. 641 (multi-use path); Fern Ridge Path #2, Project No. 423 (multi-use path); Garden Way/Knickerbocker Bridge Connector, Project No. 660 (multi- use path); Oakway Road to Coburg Road, Project No. 678 (route, multi-use path). CONCLUSION The proposed amendments meet all applicable standards and criteria in the Eugene Land Us Code OR Springfield Development Code OR Lane County Code. The proposed amendments are consistent with the applicable Metro Plan policies as discussed in these findings. 8 00223443.DOC;1 00223286.DOC;1 9 ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌÝ Ð®»´·³·²¿®§Ý¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®Ì®¿²Ð´¿²Ø±®·¦±²Ç»¿® Þ¿»¼±²Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ý±±®¼·²¿¬»¼Ð±°«´¿¬·±²Ú±®»½¿¬ ݱ±®¼·²¿¬»¼Ð±°«´¿¬·±²Ú±®»½¿¬º±®Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§¿²¼·¬Ë®¾¿²ß®»¿ Ú±®»½¿¬ л®·±¼æ îðïðîðïëîðîðîðîëîðíð îðíë Û«¹»²» øÝ·¬§ ±²´§÷ Í°®·²¹º·»´¼ ø½·¬§ ±²´§÷ Û«¹»²» Ë®¾¿² ß®»¿ Í°®·²¹º·»´¼ Ë®¾¿² ß®»¿ ̱¬¿´ Û«¹»²» ̱¬¿´ Í°®·²¹º·»´¼ ̱¬¿´ Û«¹»²»ó Í°®·²¹º·»´¼ Ó»¬®± ß®»¿ êÎÈËÚØ ñÜÏØ úÎÈÏÉÄ îËÙÔÏÜÏÚØ ïòÜ»·¹²Ð±°«´¿¬·±²º±®Û«¹»²»¬Í°®·²¹º·»´¼Ë®¾¿²Ù®±©¬¸Þ±«²¼¿®§æîèêôððð îòߪ»®¿¹»ß²²«¿´Ù®±©¬¸Þ»¬©»»²îðî뿲¼îðíðæîôíïï íòÇ»¿®Ì¸¿¬Ü»·¹²Ð±°«´¿¬·±²º±®Û«¹»²»¬Í°®·²¹º·»´¼ Ë®¾¿²Ù®±©¬¸Þ±«²¼¿®§·Î»¿½¸»¼îðîé Ò±¬»æ̸·½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿«³»²»¹´·¹·¾´»¹®±©¬¸±«¬·¼»¬¸»Ë®¾¿²Ù®±©¬¸Þ±«²¼¿®§©·¬¸·²¬¸» Ì®¿²Ð´¿²°´¿²¿®»¿ò ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ Ü ûõ÷îøû óè÷ï éçïïûêã ûÌÊÓÐ èí ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ñÇÊÈ ã×ÓÈ×Ê é×ÎÓÍÊ ìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ öêíï õÊ×Õ ïÍÈÈ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ê ùÓÈà ÍÖ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ éÈ×ÌÔÛÎÓ× éÙÔÇРìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ðÛÎØ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ óè÷ï èóèð÷ ìÇÚÐÓÙ ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÖÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ì×ÊÓÍØ ÛÎØ ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ ùÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÖÓÐ×É ïû éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÖÓÐ× ðêì ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÖÓÐ× ÎÍ ìû ó ûùèóíî ê÷ëç÷éè÷ø ôÍÐØ Û ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÙÍÇÐØ ÙÔÍÍÉ× ÈÍ ÈÛÑ× ÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÖÈ×Ê ÈÔ× ÙÐÍÉ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕèÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ ÍÖ ×ÛÙÔ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÏÛÑÓÎÕ Û Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎ ÈÍ ÓÈÉ Ê×ÉÌ×ÙÈÓÆ× ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÚÍØÓ×É óó úêó÷öóîõ éèûè÷ï÷îè íÎ ûÌÊÓÐ ÈÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÅÓÐÐ ÔÍÐØ Û ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ îÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÍ ÛØÒÇÉÈ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÖÊÍÏ Ã×ÛÊ ÈÍ Ã×ÛÊ ÈÍ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÛÆ×ÊÛÕ× ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÊÛÈ× ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÉ ÍÙÙÇÊÊ×Ø ÉÓÎÙ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ù èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ û îÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ìÐÛÎ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ Î××Ø×Ø ÈÍ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà Ú×ÈÅ××Î èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈÉ ù ÛÎØ ø óóó úûùñõêíçîø íÎ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ìÍÐÓÙà ùÍÏÏÓÈÈ×× ïìù ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÛÎ ÇÌØÛÈ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ êèì èÔÓÉ ÇÌØÛÈ× ×ÄÈ×ÎØ×Ø ÈÔ× êèìªÉ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÈÍ Ø×Ð×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛØ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÍÊ ÈÔÛÈ Å×Ê× Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×Ø ÈÍ Ú× ÎÍ ÐÍÎÕ×Ê Î××Ø×Ø ÏÍÆ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ× óÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÓÉÈ Ú×ÃÍÎØ Ã×ÛÊÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× öÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÐà ùÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×Ø ã×ÛÊ ùÛÌÓÈÛÐ óÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ûÙÈÓÍÎÉ ðÓÉÈ ÛÎØ ÏÛØ× É×Æ×ÊÛÐ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÙÔÛÎÕ×É ÈÍ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ïìùªÉ ÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÇÌØÛÈ×Ø êèì ÈÊÓÕÕ×Ê×Ø Û ÉÈÛÈ× èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ êÇÐ× èìê Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈ ÈÔÛÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ØÍ ÍÎ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Úà îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÍÖ ïÛÑ× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÈÔÛÈ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× êèì ÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÍ Ú× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× êèì ÍÊ õ×È ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ðùøù Û ÅÍÊÑ ÌÐÛÎ ÖÍÊ ÏÛÑÓÎÕ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× êèì ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÙÍÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÓÈ ÅÛÉ ÇÎÐÓÑ×Ðà ÈÔÛÈ øðùø ÅÍÇÐØ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ Û ÖÓÎØÓÎÕ ÈÔÛÈ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× êèì ÎÍÊ ÙÍÇÐØ ÈÔ×à ÇÌØÛÈ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ Úà îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÈÍ Ú× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× êèì ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÐà ÈÔ× ÈÔÊ×× ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÉÍÇÕÔÈ ðùøùªÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ Û ÅÍÊÑ ÌÐÛÎ íÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ðùøù ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ÅÓÈÔ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÈÔ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ ©ÈÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛΨ èÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ Ê×ÌÊ×É×ÎÈÉ Û ÐÍÕÓÙÛÐ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÏÛÈÓÙ ÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔ ÈÍ ÛÐÓÕÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ÇÌØÛÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎÉ èÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×É ÛÉ Û ÖÓÊÉÈ ÉÈ×Ì ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ÐÍÙÛÐ ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÛÏ×ÎØ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÏÛÎÎ×Ê Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø Ø×Ð×È× ÈÔ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÛÊÑÅÛà å÷ì ÏÍÆ× ÖÍÇÊ íøíè ôÓÕÔÅÛà ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ× óÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ÐÓÉÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× öÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÐà ùÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×Ø ÐÓÉÈ ÛÎØ ÛØÒÇÉÈ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ û ÙÍÌà ÍÖ ÈÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÛÈÈÛÙÔ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔÓÉ ûÕ×ÎØÛ óÈ×Ï éÇÏÏÛÊà ûóé ÛÉ ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈ ö èÔÓÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÓÉ ÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê ÈÅÍ ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Ø×Ð×ÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÎØ ÛØÒÇÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 Ã×ÛÊ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÔÍÊÓÂÍÎ é×ÌÛÊÛÈ× Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕÉ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Ô×ÐØ ÛÈ Û ÐÛÈ×Ê ØÛÈ× ÈÍ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×Ê ÈÔ× ÍÈÔ×Ê èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ óæ ø÷éùêóìèóíî íö ìêíìíé÷ø ûï÷îøï÷îèé ûÉ ÎÍÈ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× ÅÔ×Î ÈÔ× ïìù ÇÌØÛÈ×Ø ÈÔ× Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÓÉÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø êèì ÓÎ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÛÏÍÎÕ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÏÛØ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× êèì ÈÔ× ïìù Ø×Ð×È×Ø ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÚÇÓÐÈ èÔ×É× ÚÇÓÐÈ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÉÔÍÇÐØ ÎÍÅ Ú× Ø×Ð×È×Ø ÖÊÍÏ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÓÎÙ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×É Úà Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÏÇÉÈ ÛÐÉÍ Ú× ©ÛÏ×ÎØ×ب ÈÍ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ× ÈÔ× ÙÔÛÎÕ×É ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ×Ø Úà Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ× ÓÎ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ èÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍÎ ÙÍÆ×Ê×Ø Úà èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÈÔ× ©èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ è×ÄÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û¨ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÓÉ ÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕ Ú×ÃÍÎØ ÈÔ× çõú ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ÈÔÛÈ ÓÉ ÇÉ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÏÍØ×ÐÓÎÕ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×É èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×É ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ Ï××ÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÍÖ Û ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÅÛÉ ÇÌØÛÈ×Ø ÓÎ ÓÈ ÅÛÉ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×ÛªÉ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÍÇÐØ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÓÎ óÈ ÓÉ ÎÍÅ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×ÛªÉ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÇÎÈÓÐ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ðà éÓÎÙ× ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÏÍØ×ÐÓÎÕ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û ÅÛÉ ÚÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ Û ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÕÇÓØ×É Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û ÇÎÈÓÐ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÈÍ ûÉ ÎÍÈ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× ðùøùªÉ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×É ÛÎ ÛØÒÇÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÈÍ ÏÍÊ× ÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×Ðà Ê×ÖÐ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× Ã×ÛÊ ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛ뻃 ÉÈÇØà ÛÊ×Û ÅÍÇÐØ ÔÓÈ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÚÊÓÎÕ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÙÐÍÉ×Ê ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÍÖ ÈÔ× Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐÐà Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø êèì ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐà ÛÉ Ã×ÛÊ ÛÌÌÊÍÛÙÔ×É íøíè ÈÔ× ÛÕ×ÎÙà ÈÔÛÈ ÖÇÎØÉ ÏÛÎà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÔÛÉ ×ÄÌÊ×ÉÉ×Ø ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔÓÉ Ê×ÕÓÍÎ ÎÍ ÐÍÎÕ×Ê ÔÛÉ Û ÉÇÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈÐà ÐÍÎÕÊÛÎÕ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ Ê×ÖÐ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× Ã×ÛÊ ÛÈ ÍÖ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Ê×ÛÙÔ×Ø ÓÉ ÛÎ ÓÎÈ×ÊÓÏ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà ÈÍ ÙÍÏÌÐà ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÏÍÊ× ÛÙÙÇÊÛÈ×Ðà Ê×ÖÐ×ÙÈ ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÙÍÎØÓÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× Ú×Î×ÖÓÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÕ×ÎÙÓ×É ÖÇÎØÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Ê×ÆÓÉ×Ø ÛÕÛÓÎ ÍÆ×Ê ÈÔ× Î×ÄÈ Ö×Å Ã×ÛÊÉ ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈ×Ø ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÈÊÛÈ×ÕÓ×É ÖÍÊ Û Î×Å Ã×ÛÊ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÓÎ ÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ èÔ× ÕÍÛÐÉ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ è×ÄÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÛÊ× ÌÛÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÐÉÍ ÛÉ ÎÍÈ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÏÛÌÉ ÛÊ× ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÛÉ ÌÛÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÐÈÔÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÛÊ× ÎÍÈ ÌÔÃÉÓÙÛÐÐà ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÚÇÈ ÊÛÈÔ×Ê ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ Î××ØÉ ÈÍ Ú× ÛÏ×ÎØ×Ø ÈÍ ÉÓÏÇÐÈÛÎ×ÍÇÉÐà ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈ× ÙÔÛÎÕ×É ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈ Ê×ÉÇÐÈÓÎÕ ÖÊÍÏ ÈÔ× Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ öÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ Ê×ËÇÓÊ× ÉÍÏ× È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎ ÍÊØ×Ê ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÈÅÍ ØÍÙÇÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ Ê×ÏÛÓÎ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÊ× É×È ÖÍÊÈÔ ÓÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ø æ ûììðóùûèóíî ê÷ö÷êêûðé ûîø ìçúðóù ô÷ûêóîõ îíèóù÷é óÎ é×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà úÍÛÊØ ÍÖ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ×ÊÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ÛÎØ ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×Ø ÈÍ ðùøù Û ÅÍÊÑ ÌÐÛÎ ÈÔÛÈ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÈÔ× ÈÛÉÑ ÍÖ ÏÛÑÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ûÉ ÎÍÈ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× ðùøù ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ÈÔ× ÅÍÊÑ ÌÐÛÎ ÍÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê îÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× ÈÅÍ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÔÛÉ Ú××Î ÕÓÆ×Î ÈÍ ÈÔ× íÊ×ÕÍÎ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê Ê×ÆÓÉ×Ø ÍÎ òÛÎÇÛÊà ÈÍ ÛØØ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÙÐÛÊÓÖà ÈÔÛÈ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Å×Ê× ÛÐÉÍ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà èÔ× øðùø ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÅÛÉ Ê×ÆÓÉ×Ø ÛÕÛÓÎ ÍÎ ö×ÚÊÇÛÊà îÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÅÛÉ ÏÛÓÐ×Ø ÈÍ ÛÐÐ ÓÎÈ×Ê×ÉÈ×Ø ÌÛÊÈÓ×É Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÓÎÕ ÉÇÙÔ ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÛÎØ ÌÍÉÈ×Ø ÍÎ ïÛÊÙÔ îÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÅÛÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ê×ÕÓÉÈ×Ê õÇÛÊØ Î×ÅÉÌÛÌ×Ê ÍÎ ïÛÊÙÔ èÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈÉ Ê×Ù×ÓÆ×Ø ÎÍ Ð×ÈÈ×ÊÉ ÍÖ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ È×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ÛÈ ÈÓÏ× ÍÖ ÅÊÓÈÓÎÕ ÈÔÓÉ ûÕ×ÎØÛ óÈ×Ï éÇÏÏÛÊà ûÎà ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÅÊÓÈÈ×Î ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈÉ Ê×Ù×ÓÆ×Ø ÛÖÈ×Ê ÈÔ× ÌÊ×ÌÛÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÉÈÛÖÖ Ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÈ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÖÍÊ ÓÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎ ÓÎÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ê×ÙÍÊØ æó ûììðóùûúð÷ ùêóè÷êóû èÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÔÓÉ Ê×ÕÓÍ뻃 èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ ÕÇÓØ×É Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ Û ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÐÛÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÈÔÇÉ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÖÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÈÔ× ÉÛÏ× ÛÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ èÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÓÎ ÏÛÑÓÎÕ ÈÔ×ÓÊ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÎ ÈÔ× Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÎØ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐÉ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà úÍÛÊØ ÍÖ ùÍÇÎÈà ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ×ÊÉ ùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÈÍ Ú× ÇÉ×Ø ÈÍ ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ×èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÖÍÇÎØ ÓÎ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍØ× ùÔÛÌÈ×Ê é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ù ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍØ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍØ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ Û ÛÎØ Ú ÛÎØ Ê×ÛØÉ ÛÉ ÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ ÛèÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐÉ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÚûØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÏÇÉÈ ÎÍÈ ÏÛÑ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÐà ÓÎÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÍÖ è×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ÛÎØ ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔÍÉ× È×ÉÈÓÖÃÓÎÕ ÉÔÍÇÐØ Ú× ØÓÊ×ÙÈ×Ø ÈÍÅÛÊØ ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÍØ× ÛÉ Ø×ÉÙÊÓÚ×Ø ÛÚÍÆ× èÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎɪ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÚÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ× ÛÎØ È×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÍÊØ ÈÔÛÈ ÓÉ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÆ× ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ èÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÏÛà Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÅÓÈÔ ÏÍØÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÊ Ø×ÎÓÛÐ ÍÖ ÈÔ× Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÔ× Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Ô×ÛÊØ Ú×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÉ ÓÎ Û É×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ÒÍÓÎÈ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÛÈ Û ØÛÈ× ÈÍ Ú× Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ×Ø ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÍÎ æóó ê÷ùíïï÷îøûèóíî úÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉ ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÍÊØ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÌÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊà ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÛÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÷ ÉÈÛÖÖ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ óÖ ÈÔ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÅÍÇÐØ ÐÓÑ× ÈÍ ÈÛÑ× ÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÖÈ×Ê ÈÔ× ÙÐÍÉ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÉÈÛÖÖªÉ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ×Ø ÏÍÈÓÍÎ ÓÉ ïÍÆ× ÈÍ Ê×ÙÍÏÏ×ÎØ ÈÔÛÈ ÚÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà É×È ÖÍÊÈÔ ÓÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÷ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ×ÆÓØ×ÎÙ× ÛÎØ È×ÉÈÓÏÍÎà ×ÎÈ×Ê×Ø ÓÎÈÍ ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÍÊØ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÛÐÉÍ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÉ ÈÔ× ÙÍÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ úÍÛÊØ ÍÖ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ×ÊÉ ÛØÍÌÈ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÉ É×È ÖÍÊÈÔ ÓÎ ÷ÄÔÓÚÓÈÉ û ù ÛÎØ ø æóóó ûèèûùôï÷îèé ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ û ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÓÉÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ú ìÊ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÊà ùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ì×ÊÓÍØ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ù ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ è×ÄÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ø ìÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø è×ÄÈ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ÷ öÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÍÖ ùÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ûÈÈÛÙÔÏ×ÎÈ ö ðùøù åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ óä öíê ïíê÷ óîöíêïûèóíî ÈÔ ìÐ×ÛÉ× ÙÍÎÈÛÙÈ ñÇÊÈ ã×ÓÈ×Ê ûÉÉÍÙÓÛÈ× ìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ùÓÈà ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ øÓÆÓÉÓÍÎ å ûÆ×ÎÇ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× íê Úà È×Ð×ÌÔÍÎ× ÛÈ ÑÇÊÈÏÃ×ÓÈ×ÊüÙÓ×ÇÕ×Î×ÍÊÇÉ íÊ õÊ×Õ ïÍÈÈ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ïÛÎÛÕ×Ê ùÓÈà ÍÖ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÕÏÍÈÈüÙÓÉÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØÍÊÇÉ éÈ×ÌÔÛÎÓ× éÙÔÇРìÐÛÎÎ×Ê ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà éÈ×ÌÔÛÎÓ×éÙÔÇÐÂüÙÍÐÛÎ×ÍÊÇÉ ÍÖ ûèèûùôï÷îè ÷ öóîøóîõé íö ùíîéóéè÷îùã ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÈÍ Ú× ÇÉ×Ø ÈÍ ×ÆÛÐÇÛÈ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ìÐÛÎ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÊ× ÖÍÇÎØ ÓÎ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍØ× ùÔÛÌÈ×Ê é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ù ÷ÇÕ×Î× ùÍØ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍØ× é×ÙÈÓÍÎ Û Ú ÛÎØ ÛÐÐ Ê×ÛØÉ ÛÉ ÖÍÐÐÍÅÉ ÛèÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐÉ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÚûØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÏÇÉÈ ÎÍÈ ÏÛÑ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÐà ÓÎÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ èÔÓÉ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×É È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÎÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ Û ÉÌ×ÙÓÛÐ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ× ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÐÛÎ ÛÎØ È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÎÍÎÉÓÈ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ Ô×Ê×ÓÎÛÖÈ×Ê Ê×Ö×ÊÊ×Ø ÈÍ ÛÉ ©ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈɨ èÔ× ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÖÍÊ ÏÛÑÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÊ× ÓØ×ÎÈÓÙÛÐ Ê×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕ ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ÈÔÊ×× ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÐÐÍÅ ÈÔ× ©èÃÌ× ó¨ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ èÍ Ú×ÙÍÏ× ×ÖÖ×ÙÈÓÆ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÔ×ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÏÇÉÈ Ú× ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø Úà ÛÐÐ ÈÔÊ×× ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÓÎÕ ÚÍØÓ×É ùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÍÎ û éèûè÷åóø÷ ìðûîîóîõ õíûð ùíîéóéè÷îùã úÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ É×È ÖÍÊÈÔ Ú×ÐÍÅ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐÉ ÛÎØ ÓÎÈ×ÊÌÊ×ÈÓÆ× ÊÇÐ×É õíûð ùóèóâ÷î óîæíðæ÷ï÷îè èÍ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ Û ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏ ÈÔÛÈ ÓÎÉÇÊ×É ÈÔ× ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ÖÍÊ ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ ÈÍ Ú× ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ø ÓÎ ÛÐÐ ÌÔÛÉ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ èÔ× ùÓÈÓ×É ÍÖ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÔÛÆ× ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ ÛÎØ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ×É ÖÍÊ É×ÙÇÊÓÎÕ ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÌÇÈ ÍÎ ÛÐÐ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÔ× ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÓÎÕ ÚÍØÓ×É ÙÍØ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ× ÈÔÛÈ ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Ú× ÕÓÆ×Î ÛÎØ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕÉ Ú× Ô×ÐØ ÌÊÓÍÊ ÈÍ ÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ îÍÈÓÖÓÙÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÎØ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÌÛÊÈÓÙÓÌÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ×É× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Å×Ê× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ èÔ× ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÓÎÕ ÚÍØÓ×ɪ ÙÍØ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐ Úà Ê×ËÇÓÊÓÎÕ ÈÔÛÈ ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÙÍØ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ Ú× ÕÓÆ×Î ÛÎØ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕÉ Ú× Ô×ÐØ ÌÊÓÍÊ ÈÍ ÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ùÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ Ú×ÕÓÎ ÅÓÈÔ Û ÒÍÓÎÈ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÅÍÊÑ É×ÉÉÓÍÎ ÍÎ ûÌÊÓÐ ÖÍÐÐÍÅ×Ø ÚÃ Û ÌÇÚÐÓÙ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ íÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÈÔ× ùÓÈà ÍÖ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ã×ÛÊ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÖÊÍÏ ÈÍ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ø×ÌÛÊÈÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ øðùø èÔÛÈ ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÙÍÌÓ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐ ÌÊ×ÆÓÍÇÉÐà ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ìÍÐÓÙà ùÍÏÏÓÈÈ×× ÖÍÊ ÓÎÙÐÇÉÓÍÎ ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ êèì ÓÎ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê ÛÎØ Û ÙÍÌà ÍÖ ÈÔ× Ê×ÌÍÊÈ ÈÔÛÈ Å×ÎÈ ÈÍ ÈÔ× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ùÓÈà ùÍÇÎÙÓÐ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÓØ×ÎÈÓÙÛÐ ÌÊÍÌÍÉÛÐ ÅÛÉ Ê×ÆÓ×Å×Ø ÛÎØ ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× òÍÓÎÈ ÷Ð×ÙÈ×Ø íÖÖÓÙÓÛÐÉ ÍÖ ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÍÎ é×ÌÈ×ÏÚ×Ê ÌÊÓÍÊ ÈÍ Ú×ÓÎÕ ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ðùøù ÓÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ÛÉ ÌÛÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÅÍÊÑ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÇÌØÛÈ× ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÷ÛÙÔ ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× ÛÎØ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØ Ï××ÈÓÎÕÉ Å×Ê× ÎÍÈÓÙ×Ø ÛÎØ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× íÙÈÍÚ×Ê øðùø ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÅÛÉ Ê×ÆÓÉ×Ø ÍÎ òÛÎÇÛÊà ÈÍ ÛØØ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø Ê×ÏÍÆÛÐ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÙÐÛÊÓÖà ÈÔÛÈ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Å×Ê× ÛÐÉÍ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà ÛÎØ ÈÔÛÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÅÍÇÐØ Ú× ÌÛÊÈÓÙÓÌÛÎÈÉ ÛÉ Å×ÐÐ èÔ× øðùø ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÅÛÉ Ê×ÆÓÉ×Ø ÛÕÛÓÎ ÍÎ ö×ÚÊÇÛÊà ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÈÔ× Î×Å ÌÍÉÈÌÍÎ×Ø ØÛÈ× ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÖÓÊÉÈ ×ÆÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÊà Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ îÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÖÓÊÉÈ ×ÆÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÊà Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ ÅÛÉ ÏÛÓÐ×Ø ÈÍ ÛÐÐ Ì×ÊÉÍÎÉ ÅÔÍ ÔÛØ Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×Ø ÉÇÙÔ ÎÍÈÓÙ× ÍÎ ïÛÊÙÔ ÈÔÓÊÈà ØÛÃÉ ÌÊÓÍÊ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÖÓÊÉÈ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ îÍÈÓÙ× ÅÛÉ ÌÇÚÐÓÉÔ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ê×ÕÓÉÈ×Ê õÇÛÊØ ÈÔ× ÛÊ×ÛªÉ Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÙÓÊÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ Î×ÅÉÌÛÌ×Ê ÍÎ ïÛÊÙÔ ÈÅ×ÎÈà ØÛÃÉ Ú×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÖÓÊÉÈ Ô×ÛÊÓÎÕ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Å×Ê× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÖÍÊ ÓÎÉÌ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÈ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÎØ ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÍÖÖÓÙ×É èÔ× ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ Ð×ÛØÓÎÕ ÇÌ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÎÇÏ×ÊÍÇÉ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ å× ÖÓÎØ ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÖÍÊ ÛØÍÌÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ×É× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÏÌÐÓ×É ÅÓÈÔ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐ ÉÓÎÙ× ÓÈ ÙÍÏÌÐÓ×É ÅÓÈÔ ÛÎØ ÉÇÊÌÛÉÉ×É ÈÔ× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× éÈÛÈ×ªÉ ÙÓÈÓÂ×Î ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ õíûð èÍ ×ÉÈÛÚÐÓÉÔ Û ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙà ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ÛÉ Û ÚÛÉÓÉ ÖÍÊ ÛÐÐ Ø×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÇÉ× ÍÖ ÐÛÎØ ÛÎØ ÈÍ ÛÉÉÇÊ× ÛÎ ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÖÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÚÛÉ× ÖÍÊ ÉÇÙÔ Ø×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ èÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ìÐÛÎ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÈÔ× ÌÍÐÓÙà ÈÍÍÐ ÈÔÛÈ ÌÊÍÆÓØ×É Û ÚÛÉÓÉ ÖÍÊ Ø×ÙÓÉÓÍÎÏÛÑÓÎÕ ÓÎ ÈÔÓÉ ÛÊ×Û èÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÅÛÉ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× éÈÛÈ× ÓÎ ÈÍ Ú× ÓÎ ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÕÍÛÐÉ èÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎÓÉ Û ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÖÍÊÏÉ ÈÔ× ÚÛÉÓÉ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÕÇÓØ×É ÉÇÊÖÛÙ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û èÊÛÎìÐÛÎ ÅÛÉ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× éÈÛÈ× ÈÍ Ú× ÓÎ ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ ÉÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÕÍÛÐ èÔ×É× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÍÊØ ÉÔÍÅ ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ×Ê× ÓÉ ÛÎ ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÖÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÚÛÉ× ÖÍÊ ùÓÈÃªÉ Ø×ÙÓÉÓÍÎ ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ õÍÛÐ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÌÐÛÎÉ Ú× ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÌÐÛÎÉ ÍÖ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×Ø ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÇÎÓÈÉ ÛÎØ ÈÔÛÈ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É Ú× ÌÊÍÆÓØ×Ø ÖÍÊ Ê×ÆÓ×Å ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈ Úà ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×Ø ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÇÎÓÈÉ èÔ× õÍÛÐ ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈ ÓÉ Ï×È ÅÔ×Î ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈÓÎÕ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÚÍØÓ×É ×ÎÕÛÕ× ÓÎ ÛÎ ×ÄÙÔÛÎÕ× ÍÊ ÓÎÆÓÈ× ÉÇÙÔ ÛÎ ×ÄÙÔÛÎÕ× Ú×ÈÅ××Î ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈÓÎÕ ÚÍØÓ×É ÛÎØ ÛÎà ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×Ø ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÇÎÓÈ ÛÎØ ÅÔ×Î ÈÔ× ÛØÍÌÈÓÎÕ ÚÍØÓ×É ÇÉ× ÈÔ× ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÚÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ×ÄÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÍ ÚÛÐÛÎÙ× ÈÔ× Î××ØÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ èÍ ÙÍÏÌÐà ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× õÍÛÐ ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈ ÈÔ× ÈÔÊ×× ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈ×Ø ÈÔ× Ê×ÆÓ×Å ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÈÔ ÛÐÐ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ×Ø ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÛÐ ÇÎÓÈÉ îÍÈÓÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÎØ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÚÍÇÈ ÅÔ×Ê× ÈÔ× ÏÛÈ×ÊÓÛÐÉ ÅÍÇÐØ Ú× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÖÍÊ Ê×ÆÓ×Å ÅÛÉ ÏÛÓÐ×Ø ÈÍ ÛÐÐ ÌÛÊÈÓ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛØ Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ×Ø ÉÇÙÔ ÎÍÈÓÙ× èÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÎÍ õÍÛÐ ×ÄÙ×ÌÈÓÍÎÉ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐ õíûð ûõêóùçðèçêûð ðûîøé èÍ ÌÊ×É×ÊÆ× ÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ÐÛÎØÉ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÍÊ ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ Ê×ÕÛÊØÓÎÕ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ÐÛÎØÉ ÉÓÎÙ× ÈÔ×É× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇ× ÈÍ Ê×ÖÐ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÕÊÍÅÈÔ ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÛÎØ ÛÙÙÍÏÏÍØÛÈ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ õÍÛÐ ÓÉ ÎÍÈ Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÛÊ×ÛªÉ ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐ õíûð öíê÷éè ðûîø èÍ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆ× ÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÐÛÎØÉ ÖÍÊ ÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÇÉ× èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÛÎà ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÍÊ ÌÐÛÎ ØÓÛÕÊÛÏ Ø×ÉÓÕÎÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÎÍÊ ØÍ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÛÎà ÖÍÊ×ÉÈ ÐÛÎØÉ õÍÛÐ ÓÉ ÎÍÈ Ê×Ð×ÆÛÎÈ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÛÊ×ÛªÉ ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ éÈÛÈ×ÅÓØ× ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ õÍÛÐ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÏÌÐà ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð íì÷î éìûù÷ éù÷îóù ûîø ôóéèíêóù ûê÷ûé îûèçêûð ê÷éíçêù÷é èÍ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆ× ÍÌ×Î ÉÌÛÙ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÛÎØ ÉÙ×ÎÓÙ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É èÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÛØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ÊÇÐ× íûê ÓÉ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÈÍ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÍÉÈÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ìûìû Ê×ËÇ×ÉÈ ðÍÙÛÐ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÎÍÈ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø ÈÍ ÛÌÌÐà õÍÛÐ ÓÎ ÙÍÎÉÓØ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ Û ìûìû ÇÎÐ×ÉÉ ÈÔ× ìûìû ÛÖÖ×ÙÈÉ Û õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× öÍÊ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×É ÍÖ ÈÔÓÉ É×ÙÈÓÍÎ Û ìûìû ÅÍÇÐØ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ Û õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÍÎÐà ÓÖ Û èÔ× ìûìû ÙÊ×ÛÈ×É ÍÊ ÛÏ×ÎØÉ Û Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÐÓÉÈ ÍÊ Û ÌÍÊÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÛÎ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÌÐÛÎ ÍÊ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÓÎ ÍÊØ×Ê ÈÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ Û ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÍÊ ÈÍ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÍÖ õÍÛÐ Ú èÔ× ìûìû ÛÐÐÍÅÉ Î×Å ÇÉ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÇÐØ Ú× ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÓÎÕ ÇÉ×É ÅÓÈÔ Û ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÉÓÈ× ÍÎ ÛÎ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÐÓÉÈ ÍÊ Ù èÔ× ìûìû ÛÏ×ÎØÉ ÛÎ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø çõú ÛÎØ ÖÛÙÈÇÛÐ ÓÎÖÍÊÏÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉ ÉÇÚÏÓÈÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈÓÎÕ ÈÔÛÈ Û Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÉÓÈ× ÍÊ ÈÔ× ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÍÖ ÉÇÙÔ Û ÉÓÈ× ÓÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØ×Ø çõú ÛÊ×Û èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ Û õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÙÊ×ÛÈ× ÍÊ ÛÏ×ÎØ Û ÐÓÉÈ ÍÖ õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÏ×ÎØ Û ÌÐÛÎ ÍÊ ÙÍØ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÓÎ ÍÊØ×Ê ÈÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ Û ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÍÊ ÈÍ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÍÖ õÍÛÐ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÐÐÍÅ Î×Å ÇÉ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÇÐØ Ú× ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈÓÎÕ ÇÉ×É ÅÓÈÔ Û ÌÛÊÈÓÙÇÐÛÊ õÍÛÐ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ× ÉÓÈ× ÛÎØ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÏ×ÎØ ÈÔ× ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø çÊÚÛÎ õÊÍÅÈÔ úÍÇÎØÛÊà èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× õÍÛÐ ØÍ×É ÎÍÈ ÛÌÌÐà ÈÍ ÈÔ×É× ÌÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ õíûð ûóê åûè÷ê ûîø ðûîø ê÷éíçêù÷é ëçûðóèã èÍ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÛÎØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÈÔ× ËÇÛÐÓÈà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÓÊ ÅÛÈ×Ê ÛÎØ ÐÛÎØ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× õÍÛÐ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ×É ÅÛÉÈ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÙ×ÉÉ ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×É ÖÊÍÏ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÓÉ ÛÓÏ×Ø ÛÈ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÎÕ ÛÓÊ ÅÛÈ×Ê ÛÎØ ÐÛÎØ ÖÊÍÏ ÓÏÌÛÙÈÉ ÍÖ ÈÔÍÉ× ØÓÉÙÔÛÊÕ×ÉèÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈÐà ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎÉ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÎÍØÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈÓÆ× ÏÍØ×É ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×É ÛÎØ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÇÉ× èÔ×É× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÊ× Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× Î××Ø ÈÍ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÛÎØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÈÔ× ÛÓÊ ËÇÛÐÓÈà ÓÎ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÛÎà ÍÖ ÈÔ×É× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÎØ ÎÍ Î×Å ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÊ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ ÍÎÐà ÍÖ Ø×Ð×ÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÐÊ×ÛØà ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×Ø ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×Ø ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø ÓÎ ÛÙÙÍÊØÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× Ö×Ø×ÊÛÐ ÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÐÍÙÛÐ Ê×ÕÇÐÛÈÓÍÎÉ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ûê÷ûé éçúò÷ùè èí îûèçêûð ôûâûêøé èÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ ÐÓÖ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà ÖÊÍÏ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ØÓÉÛÉÈ×ÊÉ ÛÎØ ÔÛÂÛÊØÉ õÍÛÐ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÐÍÙÛÐ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÈÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ Ì×ÍÌÐ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÌ×ÊÈà ÖÊÍÏ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÔÛÂÛÊØÉ ÉÇÙÔ ÛÉ ÐÛÎØ ÉÐÓØ×É èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛØØÊ×ÉÉ ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ØÓÉÛÉÈ×ÊÉ öÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ Ê×ÉÈÊÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÎ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÉÇÚÒ×ÙÈ ÈÍ ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÔÛÂÛÊØÉ ÎÍÊ ÛÐÐÍÅ ÖÍÊ Î×Å Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÈÔÛÈ ÙÍÇÐØ Ê×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎ Û ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÔÛÂÛÊØ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ê÷ùê÷ûèóíîûð î÷÷øé èÍ ÉÛÈÓÉÖà ÈÔ× Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ Î××ØÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× ÛÎØ ÆÓÉÓÈÍÊÉ ÛÎØ ÅÔ×Ê× ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÉÓÈÓÎÕ ÍÖ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ Ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÉÍÊÈÉ õÍÛÐ ×ÎÉÇÊ×É ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÈÍ íÊ×ÕÍÎ ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ ÛÎØ ÓÉ ÌÊÓÏÛÊÓÐà ÙÍÎÙ×ÊÎ×Ø ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔÍÉ× ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÓÎ ÎÍÎÇÊÚÛÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× éÈÛÈ× èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÈÔ× ÙÇÊÊ×ÎÈ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÍÊ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÎÍÊ ÅÓÐÐ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ ÈÍ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÊ ÖÇÈÇÊ× Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É öÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ èÊÛÎìÐÛÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ ÈÍ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ÛÎØ ÈÍ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÍÇÈÉÓØ× ÈÔ× ÛÊ×Û ÍÊ Ø×Ð×È× ÛÎà ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÅÍÇÐØ ÏÛÑ× Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÏÍÊ× ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ÷ùíîíïã íö èô÷ éèûè÷ èÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔÍÇÈ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× ÖÍÊ Û ÆÛÊÓ×Èà ÍÖ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÛÙÈÓÆÓÈÓ×É ÆÓÈÛÐ ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ô×ÛÐÈÔ Å×ÐÖÛÊ× ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÉÌ×ÊÓÈà ÍÖ íÊ×ÕÍ뻃 ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÈÔ× ÉÇÌÌÐà ÍÖ ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ ÍÊ ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÐÛÎØÉ ÛÎØ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÍÊ ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÍÖ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ØÓÊ×ÙÈ×Ø ÈÍÅÛÊØ ×ÎÔÛÎÙÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈà ÛÆÛÓÐÛÚÐ× ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ÛÊ×Û Úà ÛÉÉÇÊÓÎÕ ÛØ×ËÇÛÈ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØ ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÈÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× Û ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÈÔÛÈ ÓÉ ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ ÉÛÖ× ÓÎÈ×ÊÙÍÎÎ×ÙÈ×Ø ÛÎØ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙÛÐÐà ÆÓÛÚÐ× ÛÎØ ÖÓÉÙÛÐÐà ÉÈÛÚÐ× ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ØÍ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÕÍÍØÉ ÈÔÍÉ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÖÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÕÍÛÐ ÍÖ ÇÉÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÓÎÖÊÛÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊ× ÈÍ ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ× ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× íÊ×ÕÍÎ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ Ê×ÙÍÕÎÓÂ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÕÍÍØÉ ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÛÐÐ ÈÃÌ×É ÏÛÑ×É Û ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎ ÈÍ ÈÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍ뻃 ×ÙÍÎÍÏà ÛÎØ Å×ÛÐÈÔ ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÈÊÓÚÇÈ×É ÈÍ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈɪ ËÇÛÐÓÈà ÍÖ ÐÓÖ× èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ¦ ôíçéóîõèÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ Î××ØÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÉÈÛÈ× èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÓÏÌÛÙÈ ÈÔ× ÉÇÌÌÐà ÍÊ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÐÛÎØÉ ÛÎØ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ Ê×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎ ÛÎà ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÍÊ ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÛÎà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÎÍØÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÉÇÌÌÍÊÈÓÆ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÌÛÈÈ×ÊÎÉ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÈÔÍÉ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÈÍ ×ÄÌÛÎØ ÔÍÇÉÓÎÕ ÍÌÌÍÊÈÇÎÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍ뻃 ÙÓÈÓÂ×ÎÉ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ìçúðóù öûùóðóèó÷é ûîø é÷êæóù÷é èÍ ÌÐÛÎ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ Û ÈÓÏ×Ðà ÍÊØ×ÊÐà ÛÎØ ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ ÛÊÊÛÎÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØ É×ÊÆÓÙ×É ÈÍ É×ÊÆ× ÛÉ Û ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ÖÍÊ ÇÊÚÛÎ ÛÎØ ÊÇÊÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ÔÛÉ ÛÎ ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ìÇÚÐÓÙ öÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÛÎØ é×ÊÆÓÙ×É ìÐÛÎ ìöéì èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ Ê×ÉÇÐÈ ÓÎ ÛÎà ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÍÊ ÙÍÎÖÐÓÙÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ìöéì õíûð èÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÛÎØ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ× Û ÉÛÖ× ÙÍÎÆ×ÎÓ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï õÍÛÐ ÓÉ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈ×Ø ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ êÇÐ× èìê ÛÉ Ø×ÖÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ íÊ×ÕÍÎ ûØÏÓÎÓÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× êÇÐ× íûê ×È É×Ë èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÛÐÐ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ íûê öÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÛÎØ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ ÛÌÌÊÍÆ×Ø ÌÇÊÉÇÛÎÈ ÈÍ íûê Ú Úà ÈÔ× ðÛÎØ ùÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍÏÏÓÉÉÓÍÎ ÍÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê èÔ× èìê ÉÈÛÈ×É ÈÔÛÈ ÅÔ×Î ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ Û ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÌÐÛÎ ÅÍÇÐØ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐà ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÛÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÊ ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈà ÈÔ× ÐÍÙÛÐ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎÏ×ÎÈ ÉÔÛÐÐ ÌÇÈ ÓÎ ÌÐÛÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÈÍ ÛÉÉÇÊ× ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× ÛÐÐÍÅ×Ø ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ×É ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖÓ×Ø ÖÇÎÙÈÓÍÎ ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈà ÛÎØ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ Ð×Æ×Ð ÍÖ É×ÊÆÓÙ× ÆÍÐÇÏ× ÈÍ ÙÛÌÛÙÓÈà ÊÛÈÓÍ ×ÈÙ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈà ûØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÉÓÕÎÓÖÓÙÛÎÈÐà ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ ÛÎ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÊ ÌÐÛÎÎ×Ø ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈà èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ÷î÷êõã ùíîé÷êæûèóíîèÍ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆ× ×Î×ÊÕà èÔ× ÷Î×ÊÕà õÍÛÐ ÓÉ Û Õ×Î×ÊÛÐ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÕÍÛÐ ÈÔÛÈ ÙÛÐÐÉ ÖÍÊ ÐÛÎØ ÛÎØ ÇÉ×É Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ×Ø ÍÎ ÈÔ× ÐÛÎØ ÈÍ Ú× ÏÛÎÛÕ×Ø ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÈÊÍÐÐ×Ø ÉÍ ÛÉ ÈÍ ÏÛÄÓÏÓÂ× ÈÔ× ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÛÐÐ ÖÍÊÏÉ ÍÖ ×Î×ÊÕà ÚÛÉ×Ø ÇÌÍÎ ÉÍÇÎØ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÌÊÓÎÙÓÌÐ×É èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÌÊÍÏÍÈÓÎÕ ÏÍÊ× ÙÍÏÌÛÙÈ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÇÉ× ÍÖ ÛÐÈ×ÊÎÛÈ× ÏÍØ×É ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÆÓØÓÎÕ Û ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï Ø×ÉÓÕÎ ÈÍ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ÈÔ× ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÙà ÍÖ ÈÊÛÆ×Ð ÅÔ×Ê×Æ×Ê ÌÍÉÉÓÚÐ× èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð ¦ çêúûîóâûèóíî èÍ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ ÛÎ ÍÊØ×ÊÐà ÛÎØ ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈÓÍÎ ÖÊÍÏ ÊÇÊÛÐ ÈÍ ÇÊÚÛÎ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÌÊ×É×ÊÆ× ÈÔ× ØÓÉÈÓÎÙÈÓÍÎ Ú×ÈÅ××Î ÇÊÚÛÎ ÛÎØ ÊÇÊÛÐ ÇÉ×É ÈÔÊÍÇÕÔ ÈÔ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÕÊÛÏÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ ÏÍÊ× ×ÖÖÓÙÓ×ÎÈ ÇÊÚÛÎ ÇÉ×É ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× çõú ÈÔÇÉ ÌÊ×É×ÊÆÓÎÕ ÊÇÊÛÐ ÐÛÎØÉ ÖÍÊ ÊÇÊÛÐ ÇÉ×É ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÐà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÏÌÐà ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûð åóððûï÷èè÷ êóæ÷ê õê÷÷îåûãèÍ ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈ ÙÍÎÉ×ÊÆ× ×ÎÔÛÎÙ× ÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎ ÈÔ× ÎÛÈÇÊÛÐ ÉÙ×ÎÓÙ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ ÛÕÊÓÙÇÐÈÇÊÛÐ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÛÎØ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ËÇÛÐÓÈÓ×É ÍÖ ÐÛÎØÉ ÛÐÍÎÕ ÈÔ× åÓÐÐÛÏ×ÈÈ× êÓÆ×Ê ÛÉ ÈÔ× åÓÐÐÛÏ×ÈÈ× êÓÆ×Ê õÊ××ÎÅÛà èÔ× åÓÐÐÛÏ×ÈÈ× êÓÆ×Ê õÊ××ÎÅÛà ÛÊ×Û ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× çÊÚÛÎ õÊÍÅÈÔ úÍÇÎØÛÊà ÓÉ ÕÍÆ×ÊÎ×Ø Úà ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÐÍÙÛÐ ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÛÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ø ÛÉ ÙÍÏÌÐÃÓÎÕ ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ èÔÍÉ× ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× ÇÎÙÔÛÎÕ×Ø Úà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÙÔÛÎÕ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ Ê×ÐÛÈ×Ø ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÈ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÉÙ×ÎÓÙ ÔÓÉÈÍÊÓÙÛÐ ×ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÛÎØ Ê×ÙÊ×ÛÈÓÍÎÛÐ ËÇÛÐÓÈÓ×É ÍÖ ÐÛÎØÉ ÛÐÍÎÕ ÈÔ× åÓÐÐÛÏ×ÈÈ× êÓÆ×Ê öÇÊÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÛÖÖ×ÙÈ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛ뻃 ÙÍÏÌÐÓÛÎÙ× ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ èÔ×Ê×ÖÍÊ× ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÙÍÏÌÐà ÅÓÈÔ õÍÛÐ õíûðé ¦ ùíûéèûð õíûðé÷ÉÈÇÛÊÓÎ× ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ùÍÛÉÈÛÐ éÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ×É ú×ÛÙÔ×É ÛÎØ øÇÎ×É ÛÎØ íÙ×ÛÎ ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É èÔ×Ê× ÛÊ× ÎÍ ×ÉÈÇÛÊÓÎ× Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÉÔÍÊ×ÐÓÎ×É Ú×ÛÙÔ×É ØÇÎ×É ÍÊ ÍÙ×ÛÎ Ê×ÉÍÇÊÙ×É ÐÍÙÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÍÊ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ûÙÙÍÊØÓÎÕÐà õÍÛÐÉ ÛÎØ ÛÊ× ÎÍÈ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ùÊÓÈ×ÊÓÍÎ ú ûØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ÏÇÉÈ ÎÍÈ ÏÛÑ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÐà ÓÎÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÕÇÓØ×É Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û èÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍÎ ÙÍÆ×Ê×Ø Úà èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÉ ÈÔ× ©èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û¨ ÅÔÓÙÔ ÓÉ ÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ×ÄÈ×ÎØÓÎÕ Ú×ÃÍÎØ ÈÔ× çõú ÛÎØ ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ÈÔÛÈ ÓÉ ÇÉ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÏÍØ×ÐÓÎÕ ÌÇÊÌÍÉ×É èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÎÙÐÇØ×É ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÖÍÊ Ï××ÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ø×ÏÛÎØ ÍÖ Û ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÅÛÉ ÇÌØÛÈ×Ø ÓÎ ÓÈ ÅÛÉ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×ÛªÉ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÍÇÐØ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÓÎ óÈ ÓÉ ÎÍÅ ÛÎÈÓÙÓÌÛÈ×Ø ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×ÛªÉ ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ Ê×ÛÙÔ ÇÎÈÓÐ ÛÌÌÊÍÄÓÏÛÈ×Ðà éÓÎÙ× ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÏÍØ×ÐÓÎÕ ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û ÅÛÉ ÚÛÉ×Ø ÍÎ Û ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÕÇÓØ×É Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÎØ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÇØà ûÊ×Û ÇÎÈÓÐ èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÅÓÐÐ ÎÍÈ ÏÛÑ× ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÐà ÓÎÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ åÔÓÐ× ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Î×Ù×ÉÉÓÈÛÈ× ÈÔÛÈ ÈÔ× È×ÄÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛ뻃 èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ Ú× ÛÏ×ÎØ×Ø ÈÍ ×ÎÉÇÊ× ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÈÔ×É× Î××Ø×Ø ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ È×ÄÈ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÐÍÎÕ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ èÍÕ×ÈÔ×Ê ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ×ÛÙÔ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÍÈÔ×Ê ÌÊÍÆÓÉÓÍÎÉ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ûØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐÐà ÈÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÉÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙ ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É Ú×ÓÎÕ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×Ø Ú×ÐÍÅ ú ÷ÙÍÎÍÏÓÙ ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ ú ÷ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ× ÈÔ× Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÅÔÓÙÔ ÅÍÇÐØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÛÙÙ×ÉÉ ÈÍ ÓÎØÇÉÈÊÓÛÐ ÛÎØ ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÛÊ×ÛÉ ÛÎØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÖÊ×ÓÕÔÈ ÏÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÙÛÌÛÚÓÐÓÈÓ×É Úà ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î×éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ûÊ×Û èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÐÛÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÛÎØ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× ûÓÊÌÍÊÈ ïÛÉÈ×Ê ìÐÛÎ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ú éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐà ÈÔ× Ø×Ð×ÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÊÍÏ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø òÛÉÌ×Ê êÍÛØ ÷ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ ÐÛÎ× ÛÊÈ×ÊÓÛÐ ìÓÍÎ××Ê ìÛÊÑÅÛà ÷ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ ÐÛÎ× ÏÓÎÍÊ ÛÊÈ×ÊÓÛÐ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× ôÓÕÔÅÛà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ åÓØ×ÎÓÎÕ ÈÍ ÐÛÎ×É ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ êÍÍÉ×Æ×ÐÈ ×ÄÈ×ÎÉÓÍÎ ö èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷Ð×Ï×ÎÈ ö ê×ËÇÓÊ× ÓÏÌÊÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ×ÎÙÍÇÊÛÕ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ×É ÛÎØ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎÉ ÓÎ Î×Å ÙÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÏÓÄ×Ø ÇÉ× ÛÎØ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÎÓÈ Ê×ÉÓØ×ÎÈÓÛÐ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐà ÈÔ× Ø×Ð×ÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÊÍÏ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÛÎØ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÷ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ õÐ×ÎÅÍÍØ áúÇÉß íÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕ úÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ûÇÈÂ×Î éÈÛØÓÇÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÊÓØ× ÐÍÈ ÈÔ ðùù éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÛÎØ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ õÛÈ×ÅÛà ÛÎØ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÎØ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ Î×Å ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÈÊ××È ìÛÈÔÅÛà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ÷ÛÉÈ úÛÎÑ èÊÛÓÐ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö×ÊÎ êÓØÕ× ìÛÈÔ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ õÛÊØ×Î åÛà ñÎÓÙÑ×ÊÚÍÙÑ×Ê úÊÓØÕ× ùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÍÊ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ íÛÑÅÛà êÍÛØ ÈÍ ùÍÚÇÊÕ êÍÛØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÊÍÇÈ× ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö ûØÍÌÈ Úà Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ× ÛÉ ÌÛÊÈ ÍÖ ÈÔ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÈÔ× ã×ÛÊ ùÛÌÓÈÛÐ óÎÆ×ÉÈÏ×ÎÈ ûÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÈÓÏÓÎÕ ÛÎØ ×ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×Ø ÙÍÉÈÉ ÛÊ× ÎÍÈ ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø ÛÉ ÌÍÐÓÙà èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ ÈÔ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÙÍÎÈÛÓÎ×Ø ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÅÓÐÐ Ú× ÛØÍÌÈ×Ø Úà Ê×Ö×Ê×ÎÙ× ÓÎÈÍ ÈÔ×ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈÓÎÕ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔÓÉ ÌÍÐÓÙà ö óÏÌÊÍÆ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ É×ÊÆÓÙ× ÛÎØ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÈÍ ÓÎÙÊ×ÛÉ× ÈÔ× ÉÃÉÈ×컃 ÛÙÙ×ÉÉÓÚÓÐÓÈà ÛÈÈÊÛÙÈÓÆ×Î×ÉÉ ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÆ×ÎÓ×ÎÙ× ÖÍÊ ÛÐÐ ÇÉ×ÊÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØ× ÈÔ× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ØÓÉÛØÆÛÎÈÛÕ×Ø ÌÍÌÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö éÌ×ÙÓÖÓÙÛÐÐà ÈÔ× Ø×Ð×ÈÓÍÎÉ ÖÊÍÏ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÷ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ õÐ×ÎÅÍÍØ íÌ×ÊÛÈÓÎÕ úÛÉ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ÍÖ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ ÍÌ×ÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÏÛÓÎÈ×ÎÛÎÙ× ûÇÈÂ×Î éÈÛØÓÇÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÊÓØ× ÐÍÈ ðùù éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÷ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÈÔ ÛÎØ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ õÛÈ×ÅÛà ÛÎØ ú×ÐÈÐÓÎ× éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ éÈÛÈÓÍÎ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ Î×Å ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ ö ÷ÄÌÛÎØ ÈÔ× ìÛÊÑÛÎØêÓØ× ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÈÔ× Ï×ÈÊÍÌÍÐÓÈÛÎ ÛÊ×Û ÛÎØ Î×ÛÊÚà ÙÍÏÏÇÎÓÈÓ×É èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÊÓØ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ûÇÈÂ×Î éÈÛØÓÇÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ ÈÊÛÎÉÖ×Ê ÉÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÛÎØ ÌÛÊÑÛÎØÊÓØ× ÐÍÈ ö ùÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ ÛÎØ ÓÏÌÊÍÆ× ÈÔ× Ê×ÕÓÍ뻃 ÚÓÑ×ÅÛà ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÛÎØ ÌÊÍÆÓØ× ÚÓÙÃÙÐ× ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ÉÇÌÌÍÊÈ ÖÛÙÓÐÓÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÚÍÈÔ Î×Å Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ×ÄÌÛÎÉÓÍÎ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø éÈÊ××È ìÛÈÔÅÛà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ÷ÛÉÈ úÛÎÑ èÊÛÓÐ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö×ÊÎ êÓØÕ× ìÛÈÔ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ õÛÊØ×Î åÛà ñÎÓÙÑ×ÊÚÍÙÑ×Ê úÊÓØÕ× ùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÍÊ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓ ÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ íÛÑÅÛà êÍÛØ ÈÍ ùÍÚÇÊÕ êÍÛØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÊÍÇÈ× ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö ìÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ Û Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ×ÎÆÓÊÍÎÏ×ÎÈ ÈÔÛÈ ÓÉ Å×ÐÐ ÓÎÈ×ÕÊÛÈ×Ø ÅÓÈÔ ÛØÒÛÙ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ×É ÛÎØ ÓÉ Ø×ÉÓÕÎ×Ø ÈÍ ×ÎÔÛÎÙ× ÈÔ× ÉÛÖ×Èà ÙÍÏÖÍÊÈ ÛÎØ ÙÍÎÆ×ÎÓ×ÎÙ× ÍÖ ÅÛÐÑÓÎÕ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÛÎØ ÚÓÙÃÙÐ× ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø éÈÊ××È ìÛÈÔÅÛà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ÷ÛÉÈ úÛÎÑ èÊÛÓÐ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö×ÊÎ êÓØÕ× ìÛÈÔ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ õÛÊØ×Î åÛà ñÎÓÙÑ×ÊÚÍÙÑ×Ê úÊÓØÕ× ùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÍÊ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ íÛÑÅÛà êÍÛØ ÈÍ ùÍÚÇÊÕ êÍÛØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÊÍÇÈ× ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö ìÊÍÆÓØ× ÖÍÊ Û ÙÍÎÈÓÎÇÍÇÉ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ Î×ÈÅÍÊÑ ÅÓÈÔ Ê×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐà ØÓÊ×ÙÈ ÈÊÛÆ×Ð ÊÍÇÈ×É Ú×ÈÅ××Î Ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÍÓÎÈÉ èÔ× ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛΪÉÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÅÔÓÙÔ Ø×Ð×È× ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÈÔÛÈ ÔÛÆ× Ú××Î ÙÍÎÉÈÊÇÙÈ×Ø Ø×ÏÍÎÉÈÊÛÈ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ ìÍÐÓÙà ö èÊÛÎÉìÐÛ뻃 ÎØ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈÉ ÓØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÈÔ× ÖÍÐÐÍÅÓÎÕ Ì×Ø×ÉÈÊÓÛÎ ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÛÉ ÔÛÆÓÎÕ Ú××Î ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø éÈÊ××È ìÛÈÔÅÛà ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ÷ÛÉÈ úÛÎÑ èÊÛÓÐ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ö×ÊÎ êÓØÕ× ìÛÈÔ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ õÛÊØ×Î åÛà ñÎÓÙÑ×ÊÚÍÙÑ×Ê úÊÓØÕ× ùÍÎÎ×ÙÈÍÊ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÏÇÐÈÓ ÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ íÛÑÅÛà êÍÛØ ÈÍ ùÍÚÇÊÕ êÍÛØ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ îÍ ÊÍÇÈ× ÏÇÐÈÓÇÉ× ÌÛÈÔ ùíîùðçéóíî èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ Ï××È ÛÐÐ ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ÉÈÛÎØÛÊØÉ ÛÎØ ÙÊÓÈ×ÊÓÛ ÓÎ ÈÔ× ÷ÇÕ×Î× ðÛÎØ çÉ ùÍØ× íê éÌÊÓÎÕÖÓ×ÐØ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ùÍØ× íê ðÛÎ× ùÍÇÎÈà ùÍØ× èÔ× ÌÊÍÌÍÉ×Ø ÛÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈÉ ÛÊ× ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÈ ÅÓÈÔ ÈÔ× ÛÌÌÐÓÙÛÚÐ× ï×ÈÊÍ ìÐÛÎ ÌÍÐÓÙÓ×É ÛÉ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉ×Ø ÓÎ ÈÔ×É× ÖÓÎØÓÎÕÉ øíù øíù ûèèûùôï÷îè ö ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ ëçûêè÷ê ÈÔ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ åÍÊÑ ìÐÛÎ íÙÈÍÚ×Ê éÇÚÏÓÈ ØÊÛÖÈ ÈÍ ðùøù íÙÈÍÚ×Ê ðùøù ï××ÈÓÎÕ ìÍÉÈûÙÑÎÍÅÐ×ØÕ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÐÛÎ ûÏ×ÎØÏ×ÎÈ ìûìû öÓÎÛÐÓÂ× ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ× ÛÎØ Ê×ÉÌÍÎÉÓÚÐ× ÌÛÊÈÓ×É ÖÍÊ ÓÎÓÈÓÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÛÊÈÓÙÓÌÛÈÓÍÎ ÙÍÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ê×ÏÍÆ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ê×ÏÍÆ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÛÊÑÅÛà ïÍÆ× íøíè ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÖÊÍÏ óÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ÈÍ öÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÐà ùÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×Ø ÐÓÉÈ ÖÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ êèì ûØÒÇÉÈ ÌÐÛÎ ÔÍÊÓÂÍÎ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ êèéì ùÍÎÈÓÎÇ× êèéì ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎ ùÊ×ÛÈ× Ø×ÖÓÎÓÈÓÍÎ ÍÖ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÉÃÉÈ×Ï ûÕÊ×× ÍÎ Õ×ÍÕÊÛÌÔÓÙ ÚÍÇÎØÛÊà ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ× Ê×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌ ÈÍ ÍÊ Ï×ÈÔÍØ ÍÖ ÓÎÙÍÊÌÍÊÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔÓÎ ÍÈÔ×Ê ÌÐÛÎÉ ìÇÚÐÓÙ óÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ ÏÇÐÈÓÛÕ×ÎÙà ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÓÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ÌÐÛÎ ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ× ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÍÇÈÊ×ÛÙÔ ÙÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÉ óØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÍÇÈÊ×ÛÙÔ ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ× Ê×ÐÛÈÓÆ× ÈÍ ÅÍÊÑ ÉÙÔ×ØÇÐ× ëçûêè÷ê éè ìûìû ûØÍÌÈÓÍÎÉ ûÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÈÍ ÛÏ×ÎØ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÈÍ ÛÙÔÓ×Æ× êèì èéì ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ê×ÏÍÆ× ÙÍÏÌÐ×È×Ø ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ê×ÏÍÆ× å×ÉÈ ÷ÇÕ×Î× ìÛÊÑÅÛà ïÍÆ× íøíè ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈÉ ÖÊÍÏ óÐÐÇÉÈÊÛÈÓÆ× ÈÍ öÓÎÛÎÙÓÛÐÐà ùÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×Ø ÐÓÉÈ ÖÍÊ ÙÍÎÉÓÉÈ×ÎÙà ÅÓÈÔ îÍÆ×ÏÚ×Ê êèì ÌÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ÐÓÉÈ ûØÒÇÉÈ ÌÐÛÎ ÔÍÊÓÂÍÎ ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ûÉÉ×ÉÉ ×ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÓÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ× æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ïÓÐ×É èÊÛÆ×Ð×Ø æïè ÙÛÌÓÈÛ ÖÍÊ ÛÎØ ùÍÎÖÓÊÏ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÓÌ Ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÛÎØ Ø×È×ÊÏÓÎ× Ê×ÐÛÈÓÍÎÉÔÓÌ Ú×ÈÅ××Î êèéì ÛÎØ èéìÉ ÓÎ Ï××ÈÓÎÕ ÈÔ× Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ çÎØ×ÊÈÛÑ× ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÛÉÉ×ÉÉÏ×ÎÈ ÛÎØ Ê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕ ÛÈ ÙÓÈà Ð×Æ×Ð ùÍÏÌÐ×È× Ê×ÌÍÊÈÓÎÕ ÍÎ èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ Ú×ÎÙÔÏÛÊÑÉ ÖÍÊ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ËÇÛÐÓÈÛÈÓÆ× ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎ ÛÚÍÇÈ ÎÍØÛÐ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ëçûêè÷ê ÎØ ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ú×ÕÓÎ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ ÍÖ ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎ ÌÛÌ×Ê óØ×ÎÈÓÖà ÌÍÈ×ÎÈÓÛÐ ÛØØÓÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ ÌÊÍÙ×ØÇÊ×É ÖÍÊ ÉÇÙÙ×ÉÉÖÇÐ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ× ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ ëçûêè÷ê ÊØ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ êèéì øÊÛÖÈ êèéì ÉÈÊÇÙÈÇÊÛÐ ÛÎØ ÌÍÐÓÙà ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ÚÛÉ×Ø ÇÌÍÎ ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐ ØÓÉÙÇÉÉÓÍÎÉ ÛÎØ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÓÎÌÇÈ ú×ÕÓÎ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÓÎÕ êèéì ÌÍÐÓÙà ÐÛÎÕÇÛÕ× ìÇÚÐÓÙ óÎÆÍÐÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÇÚÐÓÉÔ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÍÊÑ ÍÇÈÙÍÏ×É ÈÍ ØÛÈ× ÖÍÊ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈ ÛÉ ÛÌÌÊÍÌÊÓÛÈ× é××Ñ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈ ÍÎ Ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ëçûêè÷ê ÈÔ ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ùÍÎÉÓØ×Ê ÛÎØ Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ ÛØÒÇÉÈÏ×ÎÈÉ ÈÍ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× ÛÎØ ÍÊ ÓÏÌÐ×Ï×ÎÈÛÈÓÍÎ Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÈÍ ÛÙÔÓ×Æ× Ú×ÎÙÔÏÛÊÑÉ ùÍÎÉÓØ×Ê ÏÍØÓÖÓ×Ø Ú×ÎÙÔÏÛÊÑÉ ÛÎØ Ì×ÊÖÍÊÏÛÎÙ× Ï×ÛÉÇÊ×É ÖÍÊ ÈÔ× ×ÄÈ×ÎØ×Ø ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ Ì×ÊÓÍØ ëçûêè÷ê ëçûêè÷ê éèêø áê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ ÈÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ÌÊÍÕÊ×ÉÉÓÎÕ ÓÎ ÙÍÍÊØÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÅÓÈÔ ÐÍÎÕÊÛÎÕ× ÐÛÎØ ÇÉ× ÌÐÛÎÎÓÎÕ ×ÖÖÍÊÈÉß ëçûêè÷ê èô ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ êèéì ìÍÐÓÙà Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌ ÚÛÉ×Ø ÇÌÍÎ ÏÇÐÈÓÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ×Ð×ÙÈ×Ø ÍÖÖÓÙÓÛÐ ØÓÊ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈÉ ØÊÛÖÈ×Ø ÖÍÊ ÌÇÚÐÓÙ ÙÍÏÏ×ÎÈ ìÇÚÐÓÙ ÍÇÈÊ×ÛÙÔ ÍÎ êèéì ÖÊÛÏ×ÅÍÊÑ ê×ÕÓÍÎÛÐ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎ éÃÉÈ×Ï ìÐÛÎ êèéì èÛÑ× ûÙÈÓÍÎ ÈÍ Ï××È êèéì Ê×ËÇÓÊ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÏÇÐÈÓ ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÙÍÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÛÙÈÓÍÎÉ èÛÑ× ÛÙÈÓÍÎ ÛÉ Î×Ù×ÉÉÛÊà ÈÍ ×ÐÓÏÓÎÛÈ× èÊÛÎÉìÐÛÎ ÓÎÙÐÇØÓÎÕ ÏÇÐÈÓ ÒÇÊÓÉØÓÙÈÓÍÎÛÐ ÙÍÛØÍÌÈÓÍÎ ÌÐÛÎÉ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ Û Ð´¿²²·²¹ ú Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ Planning City of Eugene th 99 West 10 Avenue M Eugene, Oregon 97401 EMORANDUM (541) 682-5377 (541) 682-5572 FAX www.eugene-or.gov Date: April 7, 2009 To: Springfield Planning Commission Eugene Planning Commission Lane County Planning Commission From: Kurt Yeiter, Senior Planner City of Eugene Subject: Additional Information for Proposed and Amendments TransPlanMetro Plan In response to questions received prior to this evening’s public hearing, the following information is offered. Q1: The dates used for the planning period are proposed to extend from 2015 to 2024. The Agenda Item summary also states that the adopted RTP planning period is 2031. The work plan goal stated that appropriate jurisdictions would make amendments to the MetroPlan/TransPlan to achieve RTP/TSP "consistency". While 2024 is closer to 2031 than 2015, the dates are not, in my view, "consistent". Is this intentional or an oversight? The amendment proposed at this time is an interim step that reduces the inconsistency between the state-required Regional Transportation System Plan and the federally-required Regional Transportation Plan without need of future population projections or adjustments to land use designations. The current amendment reflects the actual growth rate of recent years and the growth rate projection prepared for Eugene and Springfield using “safe harbor” methodology. This methodology is satisfactory to ODOT and DLCD at this juncture even though the planning periods do not exactly align. A more robust calibration will occur towards the end of the multi- year work plan, when a new Regional Transportation System Plan is adopted, one that will incorporate information from the two cities’ buildable lands assessments now underway (the work plan is Attachment F of the Agenda Item Summary). Q2: Attachment B provides calculations for horizon years 2025 and 2030, not 2024. Was 2024 extrapolated from the 2025 figure? Yes, the year 2024 was calculated as when the target population would most likely be reached by extrapolating/interpolating from the 2025 and 2030 figures, using simple math. Q3: Regarding the issue of deleting projects that have been completed, I believe that several completed projects are not listed. Has the list been thoroughly reviewed? Staff is reviewing the list more thoroughly and found that there may be additional projects that can be removed from the Regional Transportation System Plan, including projects that were completed after the federally-required 2031 Regional Transportation Plan was adopted in November 2007. For example, the following additional projects in Eugene can be removed from the project lists: Terry Street, p. 14 I-105, p. 17 Glenwood Boulevard Extension, p. 21 River Avenue, p. 25 River Avenue bike lane, p. 45 th 10 Avenue bike lane, p. 46 Friendly Street bike lane/route, p. 47 Monroe Street bike lane/route, p. 48 It is the intent of these amendments to only remove projects that have been completed, not projects that can be removed for other policy reasons. Staff recommends that the Planning Commissions recommend to their respective elected officials that the Regional Transportation System Plan project lists be updated to delete all projects completed by the time of the elected officials’ hearing on this matter. Q4: The West Eugene Parkway project is still listed, though the work plan suggests they are to be deleted. The West Eugene Parkway was removed by the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) from the 2031 Regional Transportation Plan and, therefore, must also be removed eventually from the Regional Transportation System Plan. Removing the West Eugene Parkway requires co- adoption by Eugene and Lane County and will be processed separately. The amendments currently proposed only remove projects that have been completed. ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ Ú M I N U T E S JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF EUGENE, SPRINGFIELD AND LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS Springfield Library Meeting Room 225 Fifth Street—Springfield April 7, 2009 5:30 p.m. EUGENE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Phillip Carroll, Chair; Ann Kneeland, Vice Chair; Heidi Beierle, Rick Duncan, Randy Hledik, Jeffery Mills. SPRINGFIELD PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Frank Cross, Chair; Johnny Kirschen- mann, Vice Chair; Lee Beyer, Steve Moe, Sean VanGordon, Sheri Moore, Eric Smith. LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Lisa Arkin, Chair; Robert Noble, Vice Chair; Steve Dignam, Todd Johnston, Tony McCown, Nancy Nichols, Joseph Siekiel-Zdzienicki, John Sullivan. I. CONVENE Mr. Carroll convened the meeting. II. CALL TO ORDER—FOUR GOVERNING BODIES Mr. Carroll called the Eugene Planning Commission to order. Mr. Cross called the Springfield Planning Commission to order. Ms. Arkin called the Lane County Planning Commission to order. Planning Commissioners introduced themselves. Mr. Duncan arrived at 5:33 p.m. III. WORK SESSION TransPlan Horizon Year and Removal of Completed Projects Eugene Files MA 09-1 Springfield File LRP2008-00014 Lane County File PA 095108 MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— April 7, 2009 Page 1 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Proposal: Non-site specific text amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (TransPlan) to adjust the planning period from year 2015 to year 2024 to reflect actual growth rates since plan adoption and to remove completed transportation projects from TransPlan’s project lists. Amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) are also proposed to maintain consistency between TransPlan and the Metro Plan. Lead Staff: Kurt Yeiter, Senior Planner, City of Eugene, 682-8379 Greg Mott, Planning Manager, City of Springfield, 726-3774 Stephanie Schulz, Senior Planner, Lane County, 682-3958 Mr. Yeiter offered the staff report. He directed Commissioners to two documents at their seats, a decoder sheet of acronyms and a memorandum dated April 7, 2009 to the Springfield, Eugene and Lane County Planning Commissions from Kurt Yeiter, Subject: Additional Information for Proposed TransPlan and Metro Plan Amendments. He reviewed the list of acronyms. Mr. Shapiro arrived at 5:40 p.m. Mr. Yeiter said the Commissions would hold a public hearing on the following: Non-site specific text amendments to the Eugene-Springfield Regional Transportation System Plan (TransPlan) to adjust the planning period from year 2015 to year 2024 to project the average growth rate that had occurred since TransPlan’s adoption. Remove completed transportation projects from TransPlan’s project lists. Non-site specific text amendments in the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) needed to maintain consistency between TransPlan and the Metro Plan. Mr. Yeiter said based on the available information and materials in the record and the preliminary findings staff recommended approval of the proposed TransPlan and Metro Plan amendments. Responding to Mr. Siekiel-Zdzienicki, Mr. Yeiter said cities were mandated by HB 3337 to know how the current buildable lands supply compared with the demand by the end of 2009, but there was no timeline for mandating when the urban growth boundary (UGB) would be divided. The Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) work plan called for establishing separate UGBs by 2013. Responding to a question from Mr. Noble, Celia Barry,Lane County Transportation Planning and Traffic Manager, said Lane County needed to demonstrate progress to LCDC annually on the regional transportation plan (RTP). City of Eugene City Attorney Kathryn Brotherton said the West Eugene Parkway (WEP) was different than other projects on the list and was not being removed as a completed project. Because the WEP is not a completed project, the impacts on the transportation system as a whole had to be identified. Rejection of the project by the Eugene City Council and removal from the federal plan triggered TransPlan and Metro Plan amendment processes and full Transportation Plan Rule (TPR) analysis of those impacts. This analysis would occur over several years. Mr. Beyer arrived at 6:00 p.m. Mr. Yeiter stated other than questions from Commissioners were addressed in the April 7, 2009 memorandum. No other questions had been received from the public. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— April 7, 2009 Page 2 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Mr. Carroll opened the Eugene Planning Commission public hearing. Mr. Cross opened the Springfield Planning Commission public hearing. Ms. Arkin opened the Lane County Planning Commission public hearing. Mr. Carroll called for public testimony. There was no one who wished to offer public testimony. Mr. Carroll closed the Eugene Planning Commission public hearing and closed the record. Mr. Cross closed the Springfield Planning Commission public hearing and closed the record. Ms. Arkin closed the Lane County Planning Commission public hearing and closed the record. Responding to a question from Ms. Moore, Tom Boyatt, City of Springfield Public Works Transportation, said the I-5 and Beltline Road intersection project was a $180 million projected delivered over 15 to 20 years, elements of which would be built outside of the 2025 year planning horizon when the environmen- tal assessment for the project was completed. Projects would be reprioritized when TransPlan was updated. He added the I-5 bridge project was a replacement project rather than a capacity adding project. Commissioners offered corrections to scriveners’ errors which were recorded by staff. Mr. Hledik, seconded by Mr. Duncan, moved that the Eugene Planning Commis- sion recommend to the Eugene City Council that based on the findings of consis- tency set forth in Attachment E, and the evidence and testimony entered into the record, which also supported the conclusions of consistency with the applicable criteria, the Eugene City Council adopt the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan as set forth in Exhibits A, C, and D; and that the Regional Transpor- tation System Plan project lists be updated to delete all projects completed by the time of the elected officials’ hearing on this matter. The motion passed unanim- ously, 5:0. Mr. Kirschenmann, seconded by Mr. Cross, moved that the Springfield Planning Commission recommend to the Springfield City Council that based on the find- ings of consistency set forth in Attachment E, and the evidence and testimony en- tered into the record, which also supported the conclusions of consistency with the applicable criteria, the Springfield City Council adopt the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan as set forth in Exhibits A, C, and D; and that the Regional Transportation System Plan project lists be updated to delete all projects completed by the time of the elected officials’ hearing on this matter. The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. Mr. Noble, seconded by Ms. Nichols, moved that the Lane County Planning Commission recommend to the Lane County Board of Commissioners rebased on the findings of consistency set forth in Attachment E, and the evidence and testimony entered into the record, which also supported the conclusions of con- sistency with the applicable criteria, the Lane County Board of Commissioners MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— April 7, 2009 Page 3 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County adopt the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan as set forth in Exhibits A, C, and D; and that the Regional Transportation System Plan project lists be up- dated to delete all projects completed by the time of the elected officials’ hearing on this matter. The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. Mr. Carroll adjourned the Eugene Planning Commission at 6:40 p.m. Mr. Cross adjourned the Springfield Planning Commission at 6:40 p.m. Ms. Arkin adjourned the Lane County Planning Commission at 6:40 p.m. (Recorded by Linda Henry) m:\2009 minutes\joint planning commissions 090407.doc MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— April 7, 2009 Page 4 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ Ù ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ Ø Memorandum Ü¿¬»æ Í»°¬»³¾»®ïïôîððç ̱æ Ý·¬§±ºÍ°®·²¹º·»´¼Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´ôÝ·¬§±ºÛ«¹»²»Ý·¬§Ý±«²½·´ô¿²¼ Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§Þ±¿®¼±ºÝ±³³··±²»® Ú®±³æ Ù®»¹Ó±¬¬ôÍ°®·²¹º·»´¼Ð´¿²²·²¹Ó¿²¿¹»® Õ»²¬Ø±©»ôÔ¿²»Ý±«²¬§Ð´¿²²·²¹Ü·®»½¬±® Ô·¿Ù¿®¼²»®ôÛ«¹»²»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ü·®»½¬±® Í«¾¶»½¬æ Ì®¿²Ð´¿²Ø±®·¦±²Ç»¿® λ¯«»¬»¼ß½¬·±²æ ß´´±©²»©»ª·¼»²½»¿¬¬¸»¹±ª»®²·²¹£ÃÅ«°½±³·²¹¶±·²¬°«¾´·½¸»¿®·²¹±² °®±°±»¼¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸»Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²ò Þ¿½µ¹®±«²¼æײѽ¬±¾»®îðð謸»Ô¿²¼Ý±²»®ª¿¬·±²¿²¼Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬Ý±³³··±²¿°°®±ª»¼¿©±®µ °´¿²º±®«°¼¿¬·²¹¬¸»Û«¹»²»Í°®·²¹º·»´¼Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Í§¬»³Ð´¿²øÌ®¿²Ð´¿²÷ò̸»¿°°®±ª»¼©±®µ °´¿²®»¯«·®»¬¸»½·¬·»±ºÛ«¹»²»¿²¼Í°®·²¹º·»´¼¿²¼Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§¬±¿¼¶«¬¼? ªÉ± ªÅ°´¿²²·²¹ ¸±®·¦±²¬±¾»³±®»½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»§»¿®¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ì®¿²Ð´¿²Í¬«¼§ß®»¿©·´´¿½¬«¿´´§®»¿½¸¬¸» °±°«´¿¬·±²º±®©¸·½¸Ì®¿²Ð´¿²·³±¼»´»¼¿²¼¼»·¹²»¼¬±»®ª»òø̸»®»¹·±²½±ª»®»¼¾§Ì®¿²Ð´¿²· ¬¸»Â¼? ªÉ± ªÍ¬«¼§ ? ÁË©¸·½¸·¿²¿®»¿»¨¬»²¼·²¹¾»§±²¼¬¸»Ë®¾¿²Ù®±©¬¸Þ±«²¼¿®§¿²¼¬¸» Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²¾±«²¼¿®§¬¸¿¬·«»¼º±®¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²³±¼»´·²¹°«®°±»ò÷ Ѳ߰®·´éôîððçô¬¸»¬¸®»»Ó»¬®±ß®»¿Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±²¸»´¼¿¶±·²¬¸»¿®·²¹±²°®±°±»¼ ¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸»Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²ô·²½´«¼·²¹¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¬¸¿¬»¨¬»²¼»¼·¬ °´¿²²·²¹¸±®·¦±²º®±³îðï묱îðî쬱®»º´»½¬¿½¬«¿´¹®±©¬¸®¿¬»·²½»¬¸»?± ªÅ¿¼±°¬·±²òÚ±´´±©·²¹ ¬¸»°«¾´·½¸»¿®·²¹ô¬¸»¬¸®»»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±²«²¿²·³±«´§®»½±³³»²¼»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»¹±ª»®²·²¹ ¾±¼·»¿¼±°¬¬¸»°®±°±»¼Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¿²¼Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬ô·²½´«¼·²¹¬¸»Ì®¿²Ð´¿²°´¿²²·²¹ ¸±®·¦±²¿³»²¼³»²¬ò߬¬¸»¬·³»¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±²¿½¬»¼ô¬¸»Ý·¬·»±ºÛ«¹»²»¿²¼ Í°®·²¹º·»´¼©»®»°«®«·²¹°±°«´¿¬·±²º±®»½¿¬¾¿»¼±²¬¸»Í¿º»Ø¿®¾±®³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§òß½½±®¼·²¹´§ô¬¸» Í¿º»Ø¿®¾±®³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§©¿«¬·´·¦»¼¬±°®±¶»½¬¬¸»§»¿®¬¸¿¬¬¸»Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Í¬«¼§ß®»¿©±«´¼ ®»¿½¸¬¸»°±°«´¿¬·±²¬¸¿¬Ì®¿²Ð´¿²©¿¼»·¹²»¼¬±»®ª»òÞ¿»¼±²¬¸»Í¿º»Ø¿®¾±®³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§¬¸¿¬ §»¿®©¿¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§îðîìò Ѳͻ°¬»³¾»®ïôîððçô¬¸»¬¸®»»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±²½±²·¼»®»¼¿²¼®»½±³³»²¼»¼¿°°®±ª¿´±º¿ Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±·²½±®°±®¿¬»°±°«´¿¬·±²°®±¶»½¬·±²º±®»¿½¸½·¬§¿²¼¬¸»Ó»¬®±«®¾¿²¿®»¿ »¿¬¿²¼©»¬±º×뾿»¼±²¿½±±®¼·²¿¬»¼°±°«´¿¬·±²º±®»½¿¬®»½»²¬´§¿¼±°¬»¼¾§¬¸»Ô¿²»Ý±«²¬§ Þ±¿®¼±ºÝ±³³··±²»®ò̸»£kª?Yź±®»½¿¬©¿¼»ª»´±°»¼»°¿®¿¬»´§º®±³ô¿²¼«·²¹¿³±®» ®·¹±®±«³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§¬¸¿²ô¬¸»Ã?ÃÅ¿º»¸¿®¾±®°®±½»ò̸»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±²¿¹®»»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»·® °®»ª·±«®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²®»¹¿®¼·²¹¬¸»Ì®¿²Ð´¿²°´¿²²·²¹¸±®·¦±²¿³»²¼³»²¬¸±«´¼¾»¿¼¶«¬»¼¬± ®»º´»½¬¬¸»²»©»®Ý±«²¬§½±±®¼·²¿¬»¼°±°«´¿¬·±²º±®»½¿¬ò̱¬¸¿¬»²¼ô¬¸»Ð´¿²²·²¹Ý±³³··±² «²¿²·³±«´§³±ª»¼¬±Â?£««ª¬¸¿¬ô¾¿»¼±²¬¸»Ð´¿²²·²¹£««ÃãªÅ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ °±°«´¿¬·±²º±®»½¿¬ô¬¸»¿³»²¼³»²¬¬±Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸»Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²®»½±³³»²¼»¼¬±¬¸»Å»´»½¬»¼ ±ºº·½·¿´Ã±²ß°®·´éôîððçô¾»¿¼¶«¬»¼¬±®»º´»½¬¬¸»²»©°±°«´¿¬·±²ªk«?ÈÁ ̸»®«´»¹±ª»®²·²¹¬§°·½¿´Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¿²¼Ó»¬®±Ð´¿²¿³»²¼³»²¬¬¿¬»¬¸¿¬Â?ÆУ`?ªÃªÐ£Ã£ø kЪËÂ??êÐøñ ªâ ª£kª?YÆ ±±Æ£± ·£Ãª??k±ÃÆ ?êУª?Æ?± ª «ª«ª?È¼Æ Ð£`?ªÃªÐ£Ã?ÃãªÆ ±± £±±Y£ª?Æ`ê?à ?Y?£?? ?ø£??Æ?± ªªÃªÐ £««Ããªò Û£ª_`ÃªÆ ±± ±±£_ ??ÆУ`?ªÃªÐ£Y·£Ãª?Æ ?êÐÈ Áر©»ª»®ô¬¸» ®«´»¿´±¿«¬¸±®·¦»¬¸»¬¸®»»¹±ª»®²·²¹¾±¼·»¬±»¬¿¾´·¸¿ÂÃøø?ª???£Ë?ë±ÃªË£?£?ÆË?Æ ª ?Æ??£ ª?ë±Ãª?Ãøà ê?Ʊ£ ±£?ê ª?ÈÁ ̱»²«®»¬¸¿¬¬¸»¿³»²¼³»²¬¬± ¼? ªÉ± ªÅ°´¿²²·²¹¸±®·¦±²¿®»½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»®»½»²¬´§®»½±³³»²¼»¼½±±®¼·²¿¬»¼°±°«´¿¬·±² º±®»½¿¬ô¬¿ººº®±³¬¸»¬¸®»»¶«®·¼·½¬·±²®»½±³³»²¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»¹±ª»®²·²¹¾±¼·»°¿¿³±¬·±²¿´´±©·²¹ ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´»ª·¼»²½»ø»ò¹òô¬¸»½±±®¼·²¿¬»¼Ý±«²¬§º±®»½¿¬¿²¼°®±¶»½¬»¼½¸¿²¹»¬±Ì®¿²Ð´¿²¾¿»¼±² ¬¸±»º±®»½¿¬÷¿¬¬¸»·®°«¾´·½¸»¿®·²¹®»¹¿®¼·²¹¬¸»Ì®¿²Ð´¿²°´¿²²·²¹¸±®·¦±²ò̸»¸»¿®·²¹©·´´±½½«® ¿¬¿´¿¬»®¼¿¬»§»¬¬±¾»»¬ò λ´¿¬»¼Ð±´·½·»æ Ò±²»ò λ½±³³»²¼»¼Ó±¬·±²æ Ó±ª»¬±»¬¿¾´·¸¿°®±½»º±®¬¸»°»²¼·²¹°®±°±»¼¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²°´¿²²·²¹ ¸±®·¦±²¿³»²¼³»²¬¬¸¿¬¿´´±©²»©»ª·¼»²½»¿¬¬¸»¹±ª»®²·²¹¾±¼§¶±·²¬¸»¿®·²¹¿²¼¿´´±©¬¸» ¹±ª»®²·²¹£Ãż»½··±²¬±¾»¾¿»¼±²¬¸»²»©»ª·¼»²½»¿©»´´¿¬¸»»ª·¼»²¬·¿®§®»½±®¼½®»¿¬»¼ ¾»º±®»¬¸»°´¿²²·²¹½±³³··±²ò ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ × Ó·²«¬»¿°°®±ª»¼¾§¬¸»Í°®·²¹º·»´¼Ð´¿²²·²¹ ݱ³³··±²æѽ¬±¾»®çôîððç M I N U T E S JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF EUGENE, SPRINGFIELD AND LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONS Springfield Library Meeting Room 225 Fifth Street—Springfield September 1, 2009 5:30 p.m. EUGENE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Phillip Carroll, Chair; Rick Duncan, Randy Hledik, John Lawless. SPRINGFIELD PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Frank Cross, Chair; Johnny Kirschen- mann, Vice Chair; Steve Moe, Sean VanGordon, Sheri Moore. LANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Lisa Arkin, Chair; Robert Noble, Vice Chair; Nancy Nichols, Joseph Siekiel-Zdzienicki, John Sullivan. Mr. Cross convened the meeting and explained the joint public hearing process. Mr. Cross called the Springfield Planning Commission to order. Ms. Arkin called the Lane County Planning Commission to order. Mr. Carroll called the Eugene Planning Commission to order. I. BUSINESS FROM THE AUDIENCE There was no business from the audience. II. LEGISLTATIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Text Amendment and Exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway for Construction of a Bicycle/Pedestrian Viaduct Beneath the Willamette River I-5 Bridge Mr. Cross opened testimony for the Springfield Planning Commission and called for conflicts of interests orex parte contacts. There were none declared. Ms. Arkin opened the public hearing for the Lane County Planning Commission and called for conflicts of interest or ex parte contacts. There were none declared. Mr. Carroll opened the public hearing for the Eugene Planning Commission to order and called for conflicts of interest or ex parte contacts. Mr. Hledik had a potential conflict of interest with agenda item II. A. Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) Text Amendment and Exception MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 1 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway for Construction of a Bicycle/Pedestrian Viaduct Beneath the Willamette River I-5 Bridge. He was employed by a construction company that could potentially bid on the project. Mark Metzger, City of Springfield staff, explained there had been an error in the meeting location in the original public meeting announcement for tonight’s meeting. The error had been corrected by sending out new written notices and e-mail notices and hand deliveries to interested parties. Additionally, a advertisement had been placed in the Register Guard with corrected information. A sign was posted at Harris Hall, the site originally published, indicating the location time and location change. This matter would be addressed by the Joint Elected Officials (JOE) on approximately September 22, 2009, and any member of the public could address the JOE at that time. He noted there were only two occupied businesses or residences within the 300 foot notice area. There was a longer list of contacts who received information. Mr. Metzger explained this was a quasi-judicial hearing, and asked that those testifying focus on the criteria for approval of Metro Plan text amendments. He said an exception to Planning Goal 15 was under consideration. Goal 15 dealt with the Willamette Greenway. He referred to a chart on the wall that explained the process for exceptions to Statewide Planning Goal 15. Mr. Metzger provided the staff report as outlined in the agenda packet. The Eugene-Springfield area had one of the largest networks of riverfront bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the state. The current connection between Eugene and Springfield was limited to the north side of the Willamette River. The extensive south bank Willamette River path system in Eugene ended at Interstate 5 (I-5) because of the physical barriers created by both the existing I-5 bridges and the proximity of Franklin Boulevard (OR 126B) to the Willamette River. Users traveling between the two cities along the south side of the Willamette River must cross to the north side of the river near the I-5 bridge or divert to the shoulders of Franklin Boulevard (OR 126B), a high speed arterial street. Many planning documents, including the Central Lane MPO Regional Transportation Plan, TransPlan, the Glenwood Refinement Plan and Willamalane Park and Recreation District comprehensive Plan, call for the continuation of the Willamette River “South Bank Path” from Eugene through Glenwood to Springfield. Construction of the South Bank Viaduct is essential to the continuation and development of the South Bank Path. Combined, the viaduct and path will provide safer, more pleasant opportunities for recreational and commuter bicyclists and pedestrians traveling between Eugene and Springfield. The proposed South Bank Viaduct would be about 16 feet wide and 1,100 feet in length. It would connect to the South Bank Path at the point where it currently diverted away from the river. The viaduct would elevate the bike/pedestrian path and move it away from the steep bank near the I-5 bridge, and return to the riverbank at a point where the South Bank Path could continue. The proposed viaduct structure would hug the shoreline, minimizing its impact on the river. Some fill or supporting columns may be placed in the river to support the viaduct as it bypassed the slope barrier. The final design for the viaduct structure was still being completed. An ODOT Transportation Enhancement Grant of approximately $1 million, along with $250,000 in Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) funds and approximately $140,000 in donated materials would be used to fund the South Bank Viaduct project. The timing of the project would allow reuse of multiple concrete box beams from the Willamette River detour bridge on the viaduct project. As the I-5 replacement bridges were completed, and the detour bridge was removed, the South Bank Viaduct would be constructed. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 2 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Approval of this proposed Metro Plan amendment did not negate environmental review of the project. The South Bank Viaduct would undergo NEPA review to assess potential environmental impacts of the final viaduct design and to secure the needed approval for construction of the structure. Ms. Moore commended staff for seeing the opportunity to move forward with the project and take advantage of the opportunities to reuse materials from the Willamette River detour bridge. Mr. Kirschenmann concurred with Ms. Moore, seeing the reuse as recycling at its best. Mr. Cross called for public testimony. Jan Wostmann , 2645 Riverview Street, identified himself as the chair of the Laurelhill Valley Citizens Association. He said the neighborhood supported the projects and urged the commissions make the necessary exception to the statewide planning goals. However, he pointed out a deficiency of the proposal. The South Bank bike trail did not connect to the adjacent Laurelhill Valley neighborhood. The association requested that the commissions take the necessary action to connect to the viaduct and the South Bank bike trail to the Laurelhill Valley neighborhood. It was a long overdue connection and would provide a great opportunity to remedy this deficiency. Responding to questions from Planning Commissioners, Mr. Metzger referred to a map posted on the wall entitledProposed South Bank Viaduct. He noted the mission tonight was to focus on the Metro Plan amendments. While the Metro Plan amendments before the commissions neither supported nor opposed the connection proposed by Mr. Wostmannn, the project was not within the purview of the issues before the commissions tonight. He opined Mr. Wostmann’s request for a safe connection for the neighborhood was not unreasonable. Ms. Jerome, City Attorney for the City of Eugene, raised a point of order. It appeared the commissions had moved into deliberations from the public hearing process. She encouraged the commissions to conclude the public hearing and bring questions to staff during deliberations. Mr. Cross called for additional testimony. There was no one wishing to offer additional testimony. Mr. Cross closed the testimony and the record for the Springfield Planning Commission. Mr. Carroll closed the public hearing and the record for the Eugene Planning Commission. Ms. Arkin closed the public hearing and the record for the Lane County Planning Commission. In response to a question from Mr. Carroll, Mr. Metzger explained the proposed amendment language had been reviewed by legal counsel from the three jurisdictions. Ms. Arkin hoped staff would be able to assist the citizens of Laurelhill Valley to find similar special funding to improve public safety for the residents. Mr. Hledik found the findings well written and more than adequately addressed the criteria. Mr. Hledik, seconded by Mr. Lawless, moved that the Eugene Planning Commis- sion recommend to the City Council a text amendment to the Eugene-Springfield MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 3 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Metropolitan Area General Plan that added the following language: An excep- tion to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway was approved by the cities of Eugene and Springfield and by Lane County authorizing construc- tion of a bike path viaduct beneath the I-5 bridges, along the south bank of the Willamette River. The exception authorizes construction of the bike path viaduct including the fill and removal of fill necessary to build the structure. This excep- tion satisfies the criteria of Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-004- 0022(6) Willamette Greenway and the exception requirements of OAR 660-004- 0015, this exception is hereby adopted as an amendment to the Metro Plan text, Policy D. II. Chapter III, Section D. The motion passed unanimously, 4:0. Mr. Noble, seconded by Mr. Siekiel-Zdzienicki, moved that the Lane County Planning Commission recommend to the Lane County Board of County Com- missioners (BCC) a text amendment to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan that added the following language: An exception to Statewide Planning Goal 15 Willamette River Greenway was approved by the cities of Eu- gene and Springfield and by Lane County authorizing construction of a bike path viaduct beneath the I-5 bridges, along the south bank of the Willamette River. The exception authorizes construction of the bike path viaduct including the fill and removal of fill necessary to build the structure. This exception satisfies the criteria of Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) 660-004-0022(6) Willamette Greenway and the exception requirements of OAR 660-004-0015, this exception is hereby adopted as an amendment to the Metro Plan text, Policy D. II. Chapter III, Section D. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Kirschenmann, seconded by Ms. Moore, moved that the City of Springfield Planning Commission recommend to the Springfield City Council approval of File No. LRP 2009-00005, the proposed Metro Plan text amendment adding a Goal 15 exception to policy D.11 of Chapter III, Section D. for the purpose of al- lowing fill to be placed within the Willamette Greenway for the construction of the South Bank Viaduct. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Cross announced this concluded the public hearing for the Willamette Greenway. B. Metro Plan Text Amendments: New Population Forecasts for Eugene and Springfield Mr. Cross opened testimony for the Springfield Planning Commission. Ms. Arkin opened the public hearing for the Lane County Planning Commission. Mr. Carroll opened the public hearing for the Eugene Planning Commission. Greg Mott, Planning Director for the City of Springfield, offered the staff report. He introduced Jason Dedrick, City of Eugene Planning Department and Kent Howe, Lane County Planning Director. Mr. Mott distributed and reviewed the following handouts: Chronology of key population forecast events. Existing Proposed Plan Text. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 4 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Memorandum dated September 1, 2009 to City of Springfield, Eugene, and Lane County Plan- ning Commissions from Greg Mott, Kent Howe, and Carolyn Weiss, subject TransPlan Horizon Year. The City of Eugene, City of Springfield and Lane County were proposing amending the Metro Plan by adding separate population forecasts for each city and their urban growth area. The forecasts were prepared by Lane County pursuant to the provisions of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 195.036 and were recently adopted into the Lane County Rural Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Metro Plan text amendments implemented stated population forecasting and land use planning statutes by provid- ing separate coordinated population forecasts for the Eugene and Springfield jurisdictional areas of the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. Mr. Mott entered into the record the Portland State University (PSU) study. He noted the staff report was part of the record and included the findings adopted by the BCC in support of their amendment to the rural comprehensive plan. Mr. Cross called for public testimony. Michael Farthing , P.O. Box 10166, Eugene, represented Gordon Webb, who owned about 600 acres on the southeast edge of Springfield. Mr. Webb and Mr. Farthing were involved in the urban growth boundary (UGB) process and the population forecast was essential to the UGB process. He asked what would happen if the December 31 for House Bill (H.B.) 3337 compliance deadline was not met. He asked for a copy of the complete findings. He noted in the text of the plan amendment, the term “urban transition area” was used. He was not familiar with the term and asked for clarification. He also requested clarification of the language in the text which read: “In the event that either city needs to provide a forecast for a planning period that begins after 2010, that city shall determine the 20 year forecast by adding 20 percent of the 2030-2035 total population increment for each year beyond 2030.” He did not understand why there was a 2030 figure and 2035 figure, and thought it was a 20 year period from 2010. He was struck by the precision of the population forecast, asserting “nothing could be that precise.” He wished the figures were “fuzzier.” He added that the numbers in the 2030 column, 211,783 and 81,608, did not add up to the existing forecast in the Metro Plan of 286,000 by 2015, and questioned the consistency of the figures in the current Metro Plan and the PSU study. He assumed the PSU study and what the planning commissions were being asked to adopt was an amendment to the Metro Plan and the 286,000 figure was invalid and inaccurate and would go away. Mr. Farthing generally agreed with the findings on Attachment 1-8, Urbanization, Goal 14, but he thought the population forecast was directly related to Goal 14. He asserted the finding language that said “the proposed amendment to page I-1 is consistent with these statutes and with OAR 660.024” was a conclusion and not findings. He looked forward to following the process as it wound its way through the various governing bodies. Mr. Sullivan expressed concern that Mr. Farthing had a number of questions and Mr. Sullivan did not know whether they were all germane to the discussion. He asked if staff could respond to those questions during deliberation. Noting there were no other members of the public wishing to speak, Mr. Cross closed the public testimony for the City of Springfield. Ms. Arkin closed the public hearing for Lane County. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 5 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Mr. Carroll closed the public hearing for the City of Eugene. He asked if there was a reason to keep the record open. Mr. Mott saw no legal reason to keep the record open if commissioners needed no additional informa- tion. Mr. Mott addressed the concerns raised by Mr. Farthing. Question: What happened if the cities of Eugene and Springfield did not complete the requirement for H.B. 3337? Answer: Ms. Jerome responded the statute did not specific a remedy so it would be the standard remedy under the law, which staff believed would be for someone to file a writ in Circuit Court to make the cities comply. She added that everyone was on track to complete the work and staff had every reason to believe both jurisdictions would comply with H.B. 3337 within the timeframe. Question: What did the term “urban transition area” mean? Answer:Existing Proposed Plan Text Referring to the handout entitled , Mr. Mott explained staff was “recommending the tables included in the handout with figures for each of the years be- tween 2030 and 2035 to facilitate the completion of these projects without need to make addition- al amendments to the Metro Plan text”, as noted on the handout. He noted the term Metro Urban Area was used on the handout rather than Urban Transition Area. Metro Urban Area referred to the area between a land area between the city limits and the UGB. PSU had developed popula- tion figures for the Metro Urban Areas. Staff was proposing that the term Urban Transition Area be replaced with the term Metro Urban Area. Mr. Howe explained that there was a TransPlan RTP requirement that would be off by five years. Thus, the contract with PSU covered an additional five years. Question: What did “In the event that either city needs to provide a forecast for a planning period that begins after 2010, that city shall determine the 20 year forecast by adding 20 percent of the 2030- 2035 total population increment for each year beyond 2030” refer to? Answer: Mr. Mott explained the 20 percent solution referred to in the text “In the event that ei- ther city needs to provide a forecast for a planning period that begins after 2010, that city shall determine the 20 year forecast by adding 20 percent of the 2030-2035 total population increment for each year beyond 2030” referred to the mathematical formula representing five years, and al- locating 20 percent to each of the years. Although PSU would have addressed the mathematics differently, the 20 percent solution proposed by staff was reasonable. Question: What caused the change in the Metro Plan population figure of 286,000? Answer: Mr. Mott said the 286,000 figure did go away. That population forecast was used dur- ing periodic review in 1995 for a 20 year plan. The planning horizon was changing beyond 2015, and new projections were being used. Question: Related to Goal 14 findings. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 6 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Answer: Mr. Mott said the findings were perfected through the public hearing process. Hearings were not static and subject to change based upon additional information. The JEOs would adopt the findings although it was the job of the planning commissions to make recommendations to the JEOs based on findings and public testimony they receive. He added the rule was unequivocal. The inventory could not be validated for a 20 year period without a population forecast. In response to a question from Mr. Noble, Mr. Mott said the findings which Mr. Farthing thought were incomplete were those adopted by the BCC in the PSU report and coordinated figures. Ms. Jerome added said the findings were a matter of public record and had been adopted by Lane County. A more complete version would be provided to the elected officials. Ms. Brotherton explained the information before the commissioners was intended to be heads up and provide an opportunity for the commissioners to add clarification if they so choose. She noted in April 2009, the joint planning commissions held a public hearing and recommended to elected offi- cials that they adopt some amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan as part of the work plan approved by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC). The work plan required that the planning horizon of TransPlan be adjusted to get in more in line with what it actually planned for. It planned for a population for the transportation study area. She displayed a map which illu- strated the transportation study area. Responding to a question from Mr. Hledik, Ms. Jerome explained on Goal 8 that the City of Eugene PROS comprehensive plan had not yet been adopted and therefore there was intentionally not refe- renced in the current process. The Goal 11 findings could be updated based on commissioners’ comments from this meeting before the issue went to the City Council. She added there would be further discussions on Goal 11 through the Eugene Comprehensive Lands (ECLA) process. Responding to questions from Mr. VanGordon, Mr. Mott explained that the variation between the five year increments was irrelevant. Mr. Mott added that the term “safe harbor”, as referred to by the Division of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) director, was the “presumed, constant portionality”. He noted DLCD staff thought the safe harbor method did not adequately track the changes that occurred in population movements due to aging and other factors. Mr. Mott added relying on portionality of 72 percent for Eugene and 28 percent for Springfield was a simplistic approach that the state was willing to accept in the circumstances where cities were in crisis and had to have a population forecast and the counties were not acting as needed. Safe harbor was premised on the existing OEA population forecast for Lane County in 2030 to be 434,000. PSU and OEA agreed that was no longer accurate, asserting the Lane County population would be 420,000 in 2030. The original premise of attempting to calculate the constant portionality had been ratcheted down. If the 420,000 figure had been used, the safe harbor numbers would have been even smaller. Mr. Duncan, seconded by Mr. Hledik, moved to recommend that the elected offi- cials approve the Metro Plan amendment shown on page 1 of the staff memoran- dum, with the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (specifically, the amendments adding the break-out for years 2031, 2032, 2033, and 2034; and replacing the term “Urban Transition Area” with the term “Metro Urban Area”) but deleting the last sentence from the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (beginning with: “In the event. . .”). The motion passed unanimously, 4:0. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 7 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Mr. Noble, seconded by Ms. Nichols, moved to recommend that the elected offi- cials approve the Metro Plan amendment shown on page 1 of the staff memoran- dum, with the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (specifically, the amendments adding the break-out for years 2031, 2032, 2033, and 2034; and replacing the term “Urban Transition Area” with the term “Metro Urban Area”) but deleting the last sentence from the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (beginning with: “In the event. . .”). Ms. Arkin said she would support the motion but found the term Metro Urban Area confusing. She wished to have it further clarified when it was brought forward to elected officials. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Ms. Moore, seconded by Mr. Kirschenmann, moved to recommend that the elected officials approve the Metro Plan amendment shown on page 1 of the staff memorandum, with the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (specifically, the amendments adding the break-out for years 2031, 2032, 2033, and 2034; and replacing the term “Urban Transition Area” with the term “Metro Urban Area”) but deleting the last sentence from the amendments recommended in the provided hand-out (beginning with: “In the event. . .”). The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Noble, seconded by Ms. Nichols, moved that the Lane County Planning Commission close the record. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Duncan, seconded by Mr. Lawless, moved that the Eugene Planning Com- mission close the record. The motion passed unanimously, 4:0. Mr. Kirschenmann, seconded by Mr. VanGordon, moved that the Springfield Planning Commission close the record. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Carroll, moved to recommend, that based on the Planning Commission’s recommended population forecasts, the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan recommended to the Eugene City Council/Board of County Commissioners on April 7, 2009, be adjusted to reflect the new population numbers. There was no second to the motion. Following a brief discussion, Mr. Hledik concluded that he was comfortable moving forward with the motion without holding an additional public hearing. Mr. Siekiel-Zdzienicki concurred an additional public hearing was not needed. Mr. Hledik called the question. Mr. Lawless, seconded by Mr. Hledik, moved to recommend, that based on the Planning Commission’s recommended population forecasts, the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan recommended to the Eugene City Council on April 7, 2009, be adjusted to reflect the new population numbers. The motion passed unanimously, 4:0. MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 8 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County Mr. Siekiel-Zdzienicki, seconded by Mr. Noble, moved to recommend, that based on the Planning Commission’s recommended population forecasts, the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan recommended to the Board of County Commissioners on April 7, 2009, be adjusted to reflect the new popula- tion numbers. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Kirschenmann, seconded by Mr. VanGordon, moved to recommend, that based on the Planning Commission’s recommended population forecasts, the amendments to TransPlan and the Metro Plan recommended to the Springfield City Council on April 7, 2009, be adjusted to reflect the new population num- bers. The motion passed unanimously, 5:0. Mr. Cross adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m. (Recorded by Linda Henry) m:\2009 minutes\joint planning commissions 090901.doc MINUTES—Joint Planning Commissions— September 1, 2009 Page 9 City of Eugene, City of Springfield, Lane County