HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 5: PH on PROS Project and Priority Plan
ECC
UGENE ITY OUNCIL
AIS
GENDA TEM UMMARY
Public Hearing: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Project and Priority Plan
Meeting Date: April 10, 2006 Agenda Item Number: 5
Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Carolyn Weiss
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-4909
ISSUE STATEMENT
The purpose of this public hearing is to provide an opportunity for public input regarding the proposed
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Project and Priority Plan. The council is scheduled to take action on
this item on May 8, 2006.
BACKGROUND
The Project and Priority Plan contains specific project information, including a timeframe for project
implementation and cost estimates. To aid in reviewing the plan, the project information is structured in
several different formats including tables organized by planning area and tables organized by project
type. The Project and Priority Plan also includes maps showing existing and proposed resources for
each planning area and for the entire city.
The Parks, Recreation and Open Space (PROS) Comprehensive Plan, adopted by City Council on
February 13, 2006, provides concepts, principles, goals and strategies to guide preservation and
enhancement of Eugene’s Parks, Recreation and Open Space system. The projects identified in the
Project and Priority Plan are some of the means by which the strategies identified in the PROS
Comprehensive Plan can be implemented. As was the case with the PROS Comprehensive Plan, the
Project and Priority Plan is the direct result of outreach to thousands of Eugene residents.
The Project and Priority Plan is intended to be a living document, and as such, individual projects may
be delayed if funding cannot be identified within the shown timeline. Likewise, individual projects may
be moved forward if funding is identified earlier than shown in the timeline.
A City Council work session was held on the proposed Project and Priority Plan on February 13, 2006.
Attachment A to this agenda item summary (AIS) is a memorandum responding to questions from the
council regarding growth allocation percentages. The memorandum describes how the growth
allocation percentages were calculated, and describes the relationship of these percentages to the System
Development Charge methodology currently under review by a Rates Advisory Committee.
Attachment B is a spreadsheet responding to questions from the council regarding projected service
levels for each planning area based on the priority assignments in the Project and Priority Plan. This
analysis includes projected service levels resulting from the implementation of Priority 1 projects.
L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060410\S0604105.doc
An additional memorandum is forthcoming which responds to questions raised by the council at its work
session regarding funding assumptions. The memorandum and accompanying chart will identify the
assumptions that are being made to forecast future funding levels for the implementation of projects
contained within the plan.
RELATED CITY POLICIES
City policies related to this item include:
- The PROS Comprehensive Plan, adopted by City Council on February 13, 2006
- Arts and Outdoors Theme for Eugene, City Council Priority Issue
COUNCIL OPTIONS
1. Direct staff to respond to public hearing testimony at a work session scheduled for May 8, 2006.
2. Direct staff to make modifications to the PROS Project and Priority Plan and return to the council.
3. Take no action.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that the council direct staff to respond to the public hearing testimony at
a work session scheduled for May 8, 2006.
SUGGESTED MOTION
None; this is a public hearing only.
ATTACHMENTS
A. Memorandum providing Clarification of Preliminary Growth Allocation Figures in the PROS
Project and Priority Plan.
B. Projected Service Level Analysis by Planning Area
C. Additional Information Related to Preliminary Growth Allocation Figures in the PROS Project and
Priority Plan
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Staff Contact: Carolyn Weiss, Parks and Open Space Planning Manager
Telephone: 682-4909
Staff E-Mail: carolyn.j.weiss@ci.eugene.or.us
L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060410\S0604105.doc
ATTACHMENT A
Public Works
Engineering
City of Eugene
MEMORANDUM
858 Pearl Street
Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541) 682-5291
(541) 682-5032 FAX
Date:
March 6, 2006
To:
Mayor Piercy and City Council
From:
Fred McVey, 682-5216
Engineering Data Services Manager
Subject:
Clarification of Preliminary Growth Allocation Figures in the PROS Project and Priority
Plan
In a February 27, 2006 council work session on the PROS Project and Priorities Plan (Project Plan)
members of Council requested clarification of the relationship of the Project Plan to the development of
an updated parks SDC. Specifically, clarification was sought on the significance of the “preliminary
growth allocation” percentages included in the Project Plan and the method of determining these
allocation figures.
Relationship of Project Plan to Parks SDC
Adoption of a project plan is a prerequisite for updating and modifying the parks SDC insofar as a new or
modified SDC methodology must demonstrate consideration of the project costs listed in an adopted
plan. To be considered for use in developing the parks SDC the adopted plan must meet certain criteria
specified in ORS 223.309, specifically that the plan include a list of the capital improvements and the
estimated cost, timing and percentage of costs eligible to be funded with revenues from improvement fee
SDCs. The preliminary growth allocation figures included in the Project Plan are intended to satisfy the
requirement to provide an estimated “percentage of costs eligible to be funded with revenues from the
improvement fee”.
The need for an estimate of the percentage of SDC funding of projects in the Project Plan has required
analysis of parks capacity needs of growth during development of the Project Plan. The capacity analysis
used to derive the preliminary growth allocation percentages is consistent with methods, described in
more detail below, used in preliminary development of an updated parks SDC methodology. The Project
Plan is a reference document to be considered in development of the SDC, but does not prescribe the
form of the SDC methodology nor the amount of the SDC. The SDC methodology may consider the
Project Plan using a variety of means, factors and assumptions. Various policy and methodological
alternatives will be considered through adoption of a modified parks SDC, subsequent to the separate
adoption of the Project Plan. For these reasons, the affect of preliminary growth allocation percentages
contained in the Project Plan on the future modified parks SDC is variable and has yet to be determined.
Project Plan Growth Allocations
Calculation of Preliminary Growth Allocation
Oregon SDC statutes [ORS 223.229] define the portion of system costs that may be allocated to growth
through the SDC. For an improvement fee SDC, the growth allocation is determined by the projected
costs of capital improvements that are needed to increase capacity in the systemto meet the demands of
new development.
Demands for capacity in the system – both for existing and future park users (growth) – are generally
based on the projected level of service (LOS) which quantifies total future park acreage or facilities per
demand unit (generally population). Future parks acreage is determined by the existing system inventory
plus those system elements added by projects in the Project Plan. The capacity requirements for existing
development and growth are estimated by multiplying the future LOS for each park type by the
population of each group. Project Plan costs are then allocated in proportion to each group’s relative
need for the new acreage, as determined by the capacity analysis.
Table 1 at the end of this document presents a capacity analysis based on the proposed Project Plan. In
Table 1, columns ‘a’ and ‘b’ provide existing and planned future LOS calculations by park type for
developed and undeveloped land. The future LOS reflects total planned acreage, adjusted for park
projects included in the Plan that are not owned or funded by the City. The future LOS is based on
1
forecast population for 2025, and for all parks projects projected for completion by 2025.
Total capacity needs for the existing 2004 population and the increment of growth between 2004 and
2025 are presented in columns (f) and (h) of Table 1, respectively. Capacity needs are the product of the
future LOS and the population attributable to each population group.
As an example, for neighborhood park development (in the bottom half of the table), the additional need
for neighborhood park development for the existing population (36.5 acres, shown in column ‘g’), is
equal to the total need (132.3 acres shown in column ‘f’) less the existing inventory (95.8 acres shown in
column ‘c’), as existing park users’ needs are assumed to be met first by existing parks and facilities. For
growth, the additional need of 34.7 acres (column ‘j’) from projects equals the total need (column ‘g’).
The capacity analysis for land acquisition and development of other park types follows this same
methodology.
Table 2, also included at the end of this document, shows the allocation of project list acreage to existing
development and growth, based on the capacity analysis provided in Table 1. Project list acreage in
Table 2 comes from column ‘d’ in Table 1. Existing deficiency and growth acreages also come from
Table 1, columns ‘g’ and ‘j’, respectively. Using the example stated above for neighborhood park
development, the growth need is calculated to be 34.7 acres, which represents 49 percent of the total
acreage (71.2 acres) added by the project list. This percentage is then used in Project Plan as the
preliminary growth allocation for all neighborhood park development projects.
A separate capacity analysis was conducted for certain facility types for which separate project costs are
itemized in the project list. Similar to the park acreage analysis, the capacity analysis for facilities is based
on the future LOS for the existing and 2025 populations, but the capacity is expressed as number of
facilities per population rather than by acres.
1 2025 is used as the capacity planning period for all part types, except natural area parks, where
acquisitions and development within the planning window are assumed to meet capacity needs
through 2050.
Project Plan Growth Allocations
Key Assumptions
.
The following key assumptions are used in the park capacity analysis and preliminary growth allocation
?Capacity is considered by park type on a system-wide basis as opposed to individual park-by-park
basis.
?Capacity and costs are analyzed for land acquisition and development costs separately.
?Existing park users’ needs are assumed to be met first by existing parks and facilities.
?All park types are considered in the cost allocation: Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks,
Natural Area Parks, Urban Plazas, Metropolitan Parks, and Linear Parks.
?Allocations for facilities are determined based on capacity analysis by facility type.
?Improvements to Special Facility parks and facilities are allocated in proportion to future 2025
population, as all park users – existing and new – are assumed to benefit from these facilities.
?Cost allocations are based on planned level of service (LOS) resulting from the PROS Project
Plan, as opposed to exiting LOS.
?The improvement fee cost basis exclude projects, or portions of projects identified as
“renovation” in the Project Plan.
?The improvement fee cost basis exclude projects, or portions of projects that have been estimated
to be funded through other funds, e.g. grants.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 682-5216 or by email at
fred.mcvey@ci.eugene.or.us.
Project Plan Growth Allocations
Table 1
Land Acquisition and Development Capacity Analysis
(f) = (b X (h)=(b X (i)=surplus
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) = (c+d) pop) (g) = (f-c) pop) (g) ( j) = (h- i)
Existing Population
(167,081) Growth Population (43,819)
Existing Planned Added by From
Existing Existing From
LOS LOS Project Existing
Inventory Total Future Total Need (Surplus) / Total Need Project List
(acres/1,000 (acres/1,000 Plan Inventory
(acres) (acres) (acres) Deficit (acres) (acres) (acres)
Park Type
population) population) (acres) (acres)
Land Acquisition
NEIGHBORHOOD
55.0 265.6 210.4 (0.2) 55.2 0.2 55.0
PARKS 1.2606 1.2595 210.6
URBAN PARKS 1.6 2.7 2.1 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.6
0.0066 0.0126 1.1
COMMUNITY PARKS 161.5 380.7 301.6 82.4 79.1 0.0 79.1
1.3118 1.8050 219.2
METROPOLITAN
1.3 655.8 519.5 (134.9) 136.3 134.9 1.3
PARKS 3.9170 3.1094 654.5
NATURAL AREA PARKS 1,490.5 2,977.2 1,968.6 481.8 516.3 0.0 516.3
8.8985 11.7822 1,486.8
LINEAR PARKS 13.0 214.1 169.6 (31.5) 44.5 31.5 13.0
1.2038 1.0153 201.1
SPECIAL FACILITIES 0.3 131.0 103.8 (26.9) 27.2 na 0.3
0.7823 0.6212 130.7
Total Acquisition 2,904.0 1,723.1 4,627.1 3,275.6 371.7 859.1 166.6 665.5
17.3806 19.6052
Development
NEIGHBORHOOD
71.2 167.0 132.3 36.5 34.7 0.0 34.7
PARKS 0.5735 0.7919 95.8
URBAN PARKS 0.0 1.1 0.9 (0.2) 0.2 0.2 0.0
0.0066 0.0052 1.1
COMMUNITY PARKS 56.4 200.2 158.6 14.8 41.6 0.0 41.6
0.8604 0.9492 143.8
METROPOLITAN
25.5 216.9 171.9 (19.5) 45.1 19.5 25.5
PARKS 1.1456 1.0285 191.4
NATURAL AREA PARKS 0.0 16.8 13.3 (3.5) 3.5 3.5 0.0
0.1006 0.0797 16.8
LINEAR PARKS 8.0 15.4 12.2 4.8 3.2 0.0 3.2
0.0443 0.0728 7.4
SPECIAL FACILITIES 2.0 82.5 65.4 (15.1) 17.1 na 2.0
0.4820 0.3913 80.5
Total Development 536.8 163.1 699.9 554.5 17.7 145.4 23.3 107.0
3.2128 3.3187
Project Plan Growth Allocations
Table 2
Allocation of Project List
Acreage/Cost
Existing Deficiency Growth (thru 2025) Growth (beyond 2025)
Project List
Park Type Acreage Acreage % Acreage % Acreage %
Land Acquisition
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 55.0 - 0% 55.0 100% - 0%
URBAN PARKS 1.6 1.0 65% 0.6 35% - 0%
COMMUNITY PARKS 161.5 82.4 51% 79.1 49% - 0%
METROPOLITAN PARKS 1.3 - 0% 1.3 100% - 0%
NATURAL AREA PARKS 1,490.5 481.8 32% 516.3 35% 492.4 33%
LINEAR PARKS 13.0 - 0% 13.0 100% - 0%
SPECIAL FACILITIES 0.3 - 0% 0.3 100% - 0%
Total Acres 1,723.1 565.2 33% 665.5 39% 492.4 29%
Development
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 71.2 36.5 51% 34.7 49% - 0%
URBAN PARKS 0.0 - 0% 0.0 0% - 0%
COMMUNITY PARKS 56.4 14.8 26% 41.6 74% - 0%
METROPOLITAN PARKS 25.5 - 0% 25.5 100% - 0%
NATURAL AREA PARKS 0.0 - 0% 0.0 0% - 0%
LINEAR PARKS 8.0 4.8 60% 3.2 40% - 0%
SPECIAL FACILITIES 2.0 - 0% 2.0 100% - 0%
Total Acres 163.1 56.1 34% 107.0 66% - 0%
Project Plan Growth Allocations
2012 Natural Acres
2006 Natural Acres
2012 Developed Acres
2006 Developed Acres
2012 Total Acres
2006 Total Acres
2012 Park Count
2006 Park Count
NOTES
Spending
2007-2011 Project
2007-2011 Project Count
% of Population
Public Works
Engineering
City of Eugene
MEMORANDUMMEMORANDUM
858 Pearl Street
Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541) 682-5291
(541) 682-5032 FAX
Date:
April 4, 2006
To:
Mayor Piercy and City Council
From:
Fred McVey, 682-5216
Engineering Data Services Manager
Subject: Additional Information Related to
Preliminary Growth Allocation Figures in the PROS
Project and Priority Plan
In advance of an April 10, 2006 public hearing on the PROS Project and Priorities Plan (Project Plan)
staff received a request from Roxie Cuellar of the Home Builders Association of Lane County to make
additional information available to the public. This memo and attachment provides additional information
and clarification related to growth allocation percentages contained in the Project Plan. Staff had
previously provided to the Mayor and City Council clarification of the preliminary growth allocation
percentages included in the draft Project Plan as requested in a February 27, 2006 council work session.
This clarification was contained in a memo dated March 6, 2006 which was included as Attachment A to
the AIS for the public hearing on the Project Plan.
Additional information and clarification requested include:
?The estimated acquisition acreage for each individual acquisition project on the project list
?The proposed acreage to be developed for each park project on the proposed project list as well
as what part of the project acreage would be set aside as natural area.
?Explanation of why there are no existing deficiencies identified in the growth allocation
percentages with respect to neighborhood park land acquisition when Table B-1 of the PROS
Comprehensive indicates an existing deficiency for neighborhood parks.
?Explanation of why there are no existing deficiencies identified in the growth allocation
percentages with respect to neighborhood park land acquisition when proposed neighborhood
parks are to be developed in existing neighborhoods.
The estimated acquisition acreage for park land acquisition projects in the Project Plan is provided in the
project list spreadsheet attached to this memo as Table A. A clarification is that acres considered in
growth allocation percentages include only City-owned parks and facilities; acres in Tables 1 and 2 of the
March 6 memo on growth allocation are net of other agency-owned acres.
Also provided in Table A attached to this memo is the proposed acreage to be developed for each park
project. A requested clarification was to identify portions of future developed parks to be considered
April 4, 2006 Memo page 1
“natural areas”. While the portions of existing parks which function as natural area elements have been
inventoried, the exact acreage of portions of future parks to provide the function of natural areas has not
been established. It is impossible to identify the portions of future parks that might be designated as
natural area until specific sites are acquired and park design is complete. The natural area portions of a
developed park are designated and improved based on needed park functions and natural resource values
of the individual park site.
A clarification was requested as to why the “March 6 memo to the council states that there are no
existing deficiencies with respect to neighborhood parks when that position is in conflict with the PROS
plan adopted by council”. The first point of clarification is that the March 6 memo on growth allocations
shows no existing deficiencies in neighborhood park land acquisition while it does show an existing
deficiency for developed neighborhood park acreage. As explained in the previous memo, growth
allocations are based on examination of system-wide capacity using an analysis of the future level of
service (LOS) resulting from the proposed Project Plan, with land acquisition and park development
levels of service evaluated separately. In the case of neighborhood park land acquisition, the future LOS
resulting from the projects in the proposed Project Plan is slightly less than the existing level of service.
After allocating existing neighborhood park land to meet the needs of the existing population, all of
neighborhood park land acquisition in the Project Plan is needed to meet the capacity needs of growth.
In contrast, the future LOS for developed neighborhood parks resulting from the projects in the proposed
Project Plan is higher than the existing LOS. When the future acres of developed neighborhood park are
allocated to existing and future population, an existing deficiency is shown for developed parks serving
the existing population resulting in 51% of future developed acreage needs allocated to existing
population and 49% of future park development needs being allocated to growth, again on a system-wide
basis.
Comparisons between the LOS planning analysis reflected in Table B-1 of the PROS Comprehensive Plan
and the LOS resulting from the project plan are irrelevant to growth allocation percentages. Growth
allocation percentages must consider the capacity provided in the system by projects in the Project Plan
rather than a conceptual planning analysis contained in PROS Comprehensive Plan document.
Because LOS and capacity is evaluated on a system-wide basis, rather than on an individual project basis,
the proximity of future projects to developed or undeveloped neighborhood areas does not affect the
growth allocation percentages. A system-wide analysis and the simplifying assumption that capacity
needs of the existing population are met first by the existing parks inventory avoids the complexity of an
overly detailed and speculative analysis of the exact location of individual parks and park service areas in
relation to the exact location of, and resulting population related to, individual developments.
We hope that this additional information and clarification is helpful to the public in providing informed
and meaningful comment on the proposed Project Plan.
If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at 682-5216 or by email at
fred.mcvey@ci.eugene.or.us.
April 4, 2006 Memo page 2
Table A: PROS Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
new parks and open space
-
Acquire a neighborhood park site to serve this area (B3) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Acquire a neighborhood park site to serve this area (B5) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
Redevelop W. University acres 0 0 $60,000 $0 0% $0
-
Acquire neighborhood park to serve this area (S6) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Acquire a neighborhood park site (R1) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Acquire neighborhood park site (R2) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Acquire a neighborhood park site (R3 and R4) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Develop Ferndale Park Site 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop Rosetta Place as neighborhood park acres 1 1 0 $120,000 $120,000 49% $58,486
Acquire land for combined neighborhood park and Ridgeline "Gateway"
10 0 10 2.50 7.5 $1,250,000 $937,500 100% $937,500
(WC1) acres
Acquire land for combined neighborhood park and Ridgeline "Gateway"
10 0 10 2.50 7.5 $1,250,000 $937,500 100% $937,500
(WC3) acres
-
Acquire land for neighborhood park (WC5) 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
acres
-
Develop Hawkins Heights as a neighborhood park (WC4) acres 3 3 0 $360,000 $360,000 49% $175,459
-
Develop neighborhood park (WC5) 2 2 0 $240,000 $240,000 49% $116,973
acres
-
Develop Videra Park to serve WC-6 acres 2 2 0 $240,000 $240,000 49% $116,973
-
Acquire land for neighborhood park (W11) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
Develop Willakenzie school site as neighborhood park, with play area -
acres 5 5 0 $600,000 $600,000 49% $292,432
and ballfields
Acquire a neighborhood park site to north, adjacent to Golden Gardens -
acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
(B1)
-
Develop neighborhood park site (B3) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
April 4, 2006 Memo page 3
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
-
Develop neighborhood park site (B4) acres 2 2 0 $200,000 $200,000 49% $97,477
-
Develop neighborhood park site (B5) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop neighborhood park site (B1) acres 2.3 2.3 0 $276,000 $276,000 49% $134,519
-
Develop neighborhood park site (S6) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop Terra Linda Park as neighborhood park acres 4.3 4.3 0 $516,000 $516,000 49% $251,492
-
Develop Lone Oak park site as neighborhood park with athletic fields acres 3.9 3.9 0 $468,000 $468,000 49% $228,097
-
Develop Wendover Park site as neighborhood park acres 1 1 0 $120,000 $120,000 49% $58,486
Develop recreational amenities along Amazon Greenway to serve -
acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
neighborhood park needs (WC2)
-
Develop Creekside Park as neighborhood park acres 3.17 3.17 0 $380,400 $380,400 49% $185,402
-
Acquire a neighborhood park (W4) acres 4 0 4 4 $500,000 $500,000 100% $500,000
-
Develop Chase Commons as neighborhood park acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop neighborhood park site (R1) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop neighborhood park site (R2) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
-
Develop neighborhood park site (R3 and R4) acres 4 4 0 $480,000 $480,000 49% $233,946
Develop Ridgeline "Gateway" park (WC3) as both trailhead and outdoor -
acres 5 5 0 $600,000 $600,000 49% $292,432
recreation area with picnic, play area, basketball, etc.
NEIGHBORHOOD PARK TOTAL 130.7 70.7 60 5 55 $ 16,000,400 $15,315,400 72% $10,988,745
Acquire 100+ acres surrounding Golden Gardens ponds for community
acres 100 0 100 100 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 49% $979,472
park
-
Acquire Amazon Park inholdings along Hilyard for community park use acres 1.5 0 1.5 1.5 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 49% $489,736
-
Acquire community park site to serve Santa Clara acres 40 0 40 40 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 49% $2,448,680
April 4, 2006 Memo page 4
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
-
Develop Santa Clara Community Park, including lighted ballfields acres 40 40 0 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 74% $2,653,377
Acquire portion of Union Pacific area for neighborhood and community
acres 20 0 20 20 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 49% $1,224,340
park, including improved connections, recreation and open space
COMMUNITY PARK TOTAL 201.5 40 161.5 0 161.5 $ 14,100,000 $14,100,000 55% $7,795,605
Acquire land to provide urban open space within Courthouse
acres 0.75 0 0.75 0.19 0.56 $562,500 $421,875 35% $149,362
neighborhood
Acquire land for urban plaza to be developed in partnership with transit acres 0.5 0 0.5 0.25 0.25 $425,000 $106,250 35% $37,617
Acquire land to expand park blocks acres 0.5 0 0.5 0.13 0.38 $425,000 $318,750 35% $112,851
Acquire land for an urban plaza in Santa Clara acres 0.5 0 0.5 0.13 0.38 $425,000 $318,750 35% $112,851
URBAN PLAZA TOTAL 2.3 0 2.3 0.7 1.6 $ 1,837,500 $1,165,625 35% $412,681
Acquire land for Amazon Creek Greenway (WC2) 4 0 4 1 3 $500,000 $250,000 100% $250,000
acres
-
Implement plan for Jefferson Area Greenway and linear park acres 3.97 3.97 0 $476,400 $119,100 40% $47,765
Implement greenway/linear park plan for Amazon Creek from -
acres 3.97 3.97 0 $1,000,000 $0 40% $0
Headwaters to Fairgrounds in partnership with ACOE
-
Implement Rasor Park Master Plan acres 2 2 0 $240,000 $240,000 40% $96,251
Acquire linear park along Roosevelt drainage channel acres 10 0 10 10 $200,000 $100,000 100% $100,000
LINEAR PARK TOTAL 23.9 9.9 14 1 13 $ 2,416,400 $709,100 70% $494,016
Acquire land on priority stormwater corridors that link with developed
parks, acres 30 0 30 15.00 15 $600,000 $0 35% $0
include trails
Acquire additional river frontage, including property to the north acres 30 0 30 7.50 22.5 $600,000 $150,000 35% $51,959
Acquire land for natural areas within Willamette/McKenzie River
acres 100 0 100 50.00 50 $1,000,000 $0 35% $0
confluence
-
Acquire land for natural areas and access to Gillespie Butte acres 1.7 0 1.7 1.7 $212,500 $212,500 35% $73,609
April 4, 2006 Memo page 5
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
Acquire natural areas to connect Ridgeline system east to Pisgah and
acres 55 0 55 41.25 13.75 $550,000 $137,500 35% $47,629
Willamette River system
Acquire natural areas to complete Moon Mountain to Spencer Butte -
acres 325 0 325 325 $3,250,000 $3,250,000 35% $1,125,779
segment
Acquire additional ridgeline to complete Fern Ridge to West Eugene
1000 0 1000 750.00 250 $10,000,000 $2,500,000 35% $865,984
Wetlands acres
-
Acquire additional ridgeline to complete Willow Creek to Bailey Hill Road acres 300 0 300 300 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 35% $1,039,180
Acquire additional ridgeline to complete Bailey Hill Road to Blanton -
300 0 300 300 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 35% $1,039,180
Heights acres
-
Acquire natural area within Royal Mixed Use area acres 50 0 50 50 $500,000 $250,000 35% $86,598
Acquire land for natural areas along McKenzie River (Rivers to Ridges) acres 80 0 80 80.00 0 $800,000 $0 35% $0
Acquire additional Amazon Headwaters property 50 0 50 12.50 37.5 $500,000 $250,000 35% $86,598
acres
Expand Ridgeline Trail natural area park to include Spencer Creek area 500 0 500 375.00 125 $5,000,000 $1,250,000 35% $432,992
acres
NATURAL AREA TOTAL 2821.7 0 2821.7 1331.3 1490.5 $ 29,012,500 $14,000,000 35% $4,849,508
Acquire land to provide significant riverfront open space within
acres 1.76 0 1.76 0.44 1.32 $1,500,000 $900,000 100% $900,000
courthouse/cannery neighborhood
METROPOLITAN PARK TOTAL 1.8 0 1.8 0.4 1.3 $1,500,000 $900,000 100% $900,000
-
Acquire land in front of SMJ House acres 0.3 0 0.3 0.3 $171,000 $171,000 21% $35,529
SPECIAL FACILITY TOTAL 0.3 0 0.3 0 0.3 $171,000 $171,000 21% $35,529
NEW PARKS AND OPEN SPACE TOTAL
3182.1 3061.5 1338.4 1723.1 $65,037,800 $46,361,125 55% $25,476,084
new recreation facilities
Develop spray parks at Washington and or Monroe Parks ea 2 2 $150,000 $150,000 54% $81,031
Develop soccer fields at Bethel Community Park ea 2 2 $440,000 $440,000 43% $189,369
Develop a running trail to serve the Bethel area lf 2600 2600 $44,200 $44,200 100% $44,200
Develop soccer field at N. Westmoreland ea 1 1 $220,000 $220,000 43% $94,684
April 4, 2006 Memo page 6
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
Develop Striker Fields as community park with significant athletic fields,
acres 40 40 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 43% $2,151,919
lighting, within sports complex model
Provide synthetic surface field to serve Bethel/Danebo in partnership
ea 1 1 $893,000 $446,500 43% $192,166
with school district
Provide additional dog off-leash facilities north of beltline (WK) ea 1 1 $150,000 $150,000 83% $124,663
Develop trails within West Eugene Wetland sites lf 10000 10000 $160,000 $80,000 28% $22,142
Develop primary Ridgeline trails miles 15 15 $1,350,000 $1,012,500 28% $280,236
Provide trailheads and interpretive facilities within existing WEW sites ea 3 3 $180,000 $90,000 32% $28,672
Develop trails, trailheads, and interpretive facilities throughout Ridgeline mile 8 8 $720,000 $540,000 28% $149,459
Develop trails, trailheads, and interpretive facilities in WEW ea 1 1 $60,000 $30,000 28% $8,303
Develop trail facilities throughout the Ridgeline system miles 5 5 $450,000 $450,000 28% $124,550
Provide covered centrally located skate park with bicycle facilities ea 1 1 $200,000 $200,000 73% $145,440
Provide interpretive facilities and trails at Skinner Butte Park, enhance
ea 1 1 $550,000 $550,000 28% $152,366
accessibility
Provide children's play area in downtown area ea 1 1 $130,000 $130,000 54% $70,642
Develop regional play area in Alton Baker Park ea 1 1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 54% $543,402
Develop multi-cultural community center/aquatic center in
ea 1 1 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 52% $5,194,286
Whiteaker/Skinner Butte area
Develop major indoor/outdoor aquatic facility and community center ea 1 1 $14,000,000 $14,000,000 52% $7,272,001
Develop Environmental Education Center ea 1 1 $1,750,000 $875,000 21% $181,800
Develop environmental education site behind River House ea 1 1 $200,000 $200,000 21% $41,554
Develop a second Willamette River boat launch ea 1 1 $390,000 $390,000 21% $81,031
NEW RECREATION FACILITIES TOTAL
$38,037,200 $35,998,200 48% $17,173,918
improving existing facilities
Upgrade State Street Park ea 1 1 $200,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Charnel Mulligan acres 1.2 1.2 $150,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Tugman Park ea 1 1 $275,000 $0 0% $0
April 4, 2006 Memo page 7
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
Enhance Crest Heights prairie habitat acres 3 3 $75,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Bond Lane park ea 1 1 $200,000 $25,000 54% $13,419
Upgrade Sladden Park acres 1.2 1.2 $150,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Lafferty Park ea 1 1 $100,000 $25,000 54% $13,419
Implement Friendly Park plan ea 1 1 $100,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Kincaid Park ea 1 1 $100,000 $50,000 54% $27,170
Upgrade University Park ea 1 1 $150,000 $0 0% $0
Enhance natural area at Bramblewood acres 4 4 $100,000 $0 0% $0
Upgrade Berkeley Park ea 0.53 0.53 $100,000 $25,000 49% $12,185
Complete Petersen Barn Park, including parking revisions ea 2 2 $400,000 $100,000 74% $73,705
Develop play area at Ascot ea 1 1 $75,000 $50,000 54% $27,170
Renovate Sheldon Community Center and pool ea 1 1 $5,800,000 $0 0% $0
Improve Echo Hollow Pool ea 1 1 $4,500,000 $0 0% $0
Implement Amazon Park master plan ea 1.5 1.5 $2,749,000 $400,000 77% $308,433
Implement Westmoreland Park master plan ea 14.43 14.43 $500,000 $125,000 74% $92,131
Enhance Spencer Butte Trail system ea 1 1 $500,000 $0 0% $0
-
Implement Wild Iris Ridge Habitat Enhancement Plan 123 123 $615,000 $67,650 35% $23,434
acres
Restore Willow Creek between 11th & 18th 60 60 $300,000 $0 0% $0
acres
Implement Ridgeline master Plan ea 1 1 $500,000 $0 0% $0
Implement Skinner Butte Park Master Plan acres 22.52 22.52 $5,722,000 $3,147,100 100% $3,147,100
Provide accessible trails within Hendricks Park Forest lf 3500 3500 $152,250 $0 0% $0
Implement Hendricks Park Forest Management Plan acres 2 2 $700,000 $25,000 64% $15,963
Replace aging infrastructure at Alton Baker Park acres 2 2 $200,000 $0 0% $0
Renovate Alton Baker Canoe Canal for kayaking, recreation, and natural
0 $5,000,000 $0 0% $0
resource benefits
Complete Alton Baker Park, update WABP Development Plan and
acres 30 30 $3,664,000 $0 28% $0
EABP Master Plan
Implement Morse Ranch master plan acres 3 3 $600,000 $120,000 100% $120,000
Upgrade Campbell Center with fitness center ea 1 1 $2,600,000 $2,288,000 0% $0
Develop parking and access to Laurelwood "Back 9" and Ribbon Trail
acres 2 2 $400,000 $200,000 21% $41,554
south end
April 4, 2006 Memo page 8
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
Replace Maintenance Buildings at Laurelwood ea 1 1 $944,000 $0 0% $0
Improve Tennis Courts at WHS in partnership with Bethel School
ea 1 1 $100,000 $0 0% $0
District 52
Complete second phase of River House Master Plan ea 1 1 $1,200,000 $600,000 21% $124,663
Renovate park restrooms ea 7 7 $840,000 $0 0% $0
Develop children's play area renovation program ea 1 1 $200,000 $0 0% $0
Decommission wading pools ea 1 1 $500,000 $0 0% $0
Renovate park irrigation systems ea 1 1 $1,000,000 $0 0% $0
Renovate park lighting systems ea 1 1 $500,000 $0 0% $0
Renovate tennis courts, including resurfacing ea 1 1 $1,000,000 $250,000 81% $201,279
Implement habitat management plans ea 1 1 $1,000,000 $0 0% $0
IMPROVE EXISTING FACILITIES TOTAL
$ 43,961,250 $7,497,750 57% $4,241,623
access improvements
Improve access to Friendly & Lafferty Parks (See S2 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Improve access to Kincaid and Milton (See S4 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Develop access improvements to meet neighborhood park needs (See
ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
B2 on Map 3)
Develop access improvements to serve this neighborhood (See B6 on
ea 1 1 $25,000 $18,750 49% $9,139
Map 3)
Improve access to Frank Kinney, Edgewood and S6 (See S7 on map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Improve access to Fairmount and Laurel Hill Park (See S1 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Improve access to Amazon Park (See S3 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Improve access to Tugman Park (See S5 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $150,000 $112,500 49% $54,831
Improve access to existing parks (See R5 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
April 4, 2006 Memo page 9
Capacity-
related
Acquis-
Total Project
ition
Table A: PROS
Develop-Acqis-Partner Estimated Costs Net Preliminary Preliminary
Acres
Project and Priority Plan - Project Acres & Growth
Units Quantity ment ition Funded Acquisition of Growth Growth
Net of
Acres Acres Acres Development Renovation, Share Cost
Allocation
Partner
Cost Grants &
Funded
Other
Funds
Improve access to existing parks (See R6 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
Enhance access to Striker Fields (See W3 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
Enhance access to Brewer & Bond Lane parks (See W5 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
Improve connectivity to Sheldon (See W6 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
Enhance access to Crescent Park (See W7 on Map 3) ea 1 1 $50,000 $37,500 49% $18,277
Improve access and parking at Cal Young Sports Park (See W2 on Map
ea 1 1 $100,000 $0 49% $0
3)
Enhance access to Willakenzie school and Ascot Park (See W9 and
ea 2 2 $100,000 $75,000 49% $36,554
W10 on Map 3)
Replace pedestrian bridges at Amazon Park, add new bridges where
ea 1 1 $500,000 $0 0% $0
needed
Develop access improvements between parks, schools and
lf 2000 2000 $32,000 $24,000 21% $4,987
neighborhoods to WEW system and bike system
Develop pedestrian improvements to link downtown with Skinner Butte
Park, SMJ house, and riverfront system (excluding pedestrian bridge at ea 1 1 $1,400,000 $700,000 21% $145,440
train station)
Improve access north/south of Beltline ea 1 1 $300,000 $0 0% $0
Complete comprehensive POS Signage System ea 1 1 $300,000 $300,000 21% $62,331
Complete ADA improvements ea 1 1 $200,000 $200,000 21% $41,554
Improve Royal Avenue to enhance park/school connectivity ea 1 1 $100,000 $50,000 21% $10,389
Provide access to Golden Gardens ea 1 1 $150,000 $150,000 21% $31,166
ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL
$4,757,000 $2,680,250 34% $908,147
GRAND TOTAL $151,793,250 $92,537,325 52% $47,799,772
April 4, 2006 Memo page 10