HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem A: Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment Proposal
ECC
UGENE ITY OUNCIL
AIS
GENDA TEM UMMARY
Work Session: Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Boundary
Adjustment Proposal
Meeting Date: November 30, 2011 Agenda Item Number: A
Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Alissa Hansen
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5508
ISSUE STATEMENT
This work session provides an opportunity to update the City Council on the proposed Eugene-
Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) boundary amendment to adjust the boundary
on the Springfield side of the plan. While not a part of the current proposal, the legal and policy
considerations related to adjusting the Metro Plan boundary on the Eugene side will also be addressed.
BACKGROUND
Earlier this year, the Lane County Board of Commissioners initiated an amendment to the Metro Plan to
make adjustments to the boundary of the plan. This proposal is directly related to the five areas of
concern identified by the board and discussed by the joint elected officials over the past few years. The
purpose of this particular amendment is to seek jurisdictional autonomy on land use matters for those
areas that are outside the urban growth boundaries of Springfield and Eugene, but currently inside the
Metro Plan boundary.
The current Metro Plan amendment under consideration is to reduce the size of the Metro Plan boundary
on the east side of I-5, with a resulting Metro Plan boundary that would be coterminous with
Springfield’s urban growth boundary (UGB). Adjustment of the Metro Plan boundary on the Eugene
side is not part of the current proposal. Lane County intends to propose a Metro Plan boundary change
on the Eugene side at a later date. A copy of the current Metro Plan diagram, including the boundary, is
provided as Attachment A.
Based on the Metro Plan’s amendment procedures, Eugene is required to participate in this proposal to
adjust the boundary on the Springfield side. The process includes a joint planning commission public
hearing and recommendation, followed by a joint elected official’s public hearing and action. All three
jurisdictions must approve the same Metro Plan boundary location for the proposal to take effect. In
July, the joint planning commissions (Lane County, Springfield and Eugene) held the required public
hearing, and held a continued hearing in August. Following the close of the public hearing record, the
three planning commissions met jointly in October for deliberations and to provide recommendations to
their respective elected officials. The Lane County Planning Commission voted 7-2 to recommend
denial of the proposal to the Lane County Board of Commissioners. The City of Springfield voted 4-2
to recommend approval to the Springfield City Council, with a condition that Springfield and Lane
County enter into an agreement to address concerns about authority over Springfield’s drinking water
wells. The Eugene Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval of the proposal to the
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111130\S111130A.doc
Eugene City Council. A public hearing before the joint elected officials, and subsequent action, has not
yet been scheduled, but is anticipated to occur in early 2012.
The scope and timing of a future County-initiated proposal to amend the boundary on the Eugene side of
the Metro Plan has not been established, and will be subject to a separate public process. Lane County
has acknowledged that, given the different circumstances on the Eugene side, such as the location of the
Eugene Airport outside of Eugene’s current UGB, the County’s proposal for the Eugene side may not
precisely follow Eugene’s UGB; it may propose to leave some areas that are located outside of Eugene’s
UGB within the new Metro Plan boundary so the City continues to have some decision-making
authority in those areas. The council’s upcoming participation in the County’s proposal to adjust the
Springfield side of the Metro Plan boundary may help the Eugene City Council identify some of the
issues it will eventually consider when a similar proposal is made for the Eugene side. The outcome of
Envision Eugene, including the location of Eugene's UGB, will be a factor in more specifically
identifying those issues. It is anticipated that the County will ask Eugene to consider the proposal as
part of the Envision Eugene final adoption process.
Because jurisdictional autonomy is a fundamental reason this proposal was initiated by Lane County,
this work session will provide an overview of the jurisdictional decision-making authority within the
current Metro Plan boundary. A memo that was presented to the joint planning commissions regarding
this topic is provided as Attachment B.
It is important to note that the Metro Plan amendment procedures generally prohibit new evidence from
being introduced at the joint elected officials’ public hearing. However, the joint elected officials have
the authority to decide prior to the public hearing that they will allow new evidence. Until such time,
staff’s presentation and the council’s discussion will need to be limited to the information in the public
hearing record from the joint planning commission proceedings.
RELATED CITY POLICIES
Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan
Growth Management Policies
COUNCIL OPTIONS
No formal action is required at this time.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION
No action is required on this item. Therefore, no recommendations are offered by the City Manager.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS
No action is required on this item. Therefore, no motions are suggested.
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111130\S111130A.doc
ATTACHMENTS
A.Map of Current Metro Plan Boundary
B.Memo on Jurisdictional Decision-Making Authority
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Staff Contact: Alissa Hansen, 541-682-5508
Staff E-Mail: alissa.h.hansen@ci.eguene.or.us
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111130\S111130A.doc
TST S13
Planning & Development
Planning
City of Eugene
th
99 West 10 Avenue
Eugene, Oregon 97401
M (541) 682-5377
EMORANDUM
(541) 682-5572 FAX
www.eugene-or.gov
Date: August 16, 2011
To: Lane County Planning Commission, City of Springfield Planning Commission and City of
Eugene Planning Commission
From: Alissa Hansen, City of Eugene Planning Division
Subject: Proposed Metro Plan Boundary Adjustment on East Side of Interstate 5
Attached are two documents intended to provide clarity regarding jurisdictional decision making
authority within the current Metro Plan boundary. The first document includes a chart identifying which
governing bodies have authority with respect to each type of Metro Plan amendment, as well as
zoning/land use code administration. The chart is color-coded based on the accompanying map (second
document), which illustrates the various jurisdictional boundaries. The map includes the west side of I-5
for context only; the proposed amendment is for the east side of I-5.
ATTACHMENTS
A.Current Authority for Metro Plan Amendments and Zoning/Lane Use Code Administration
B.Map of Boundary Relationships
Metro Plan Amendment Review Process
The Metro Plan provides a review and approval process for amendments to the Metro Plan. The applicable
process depends upon the nature and location of the proposed amendment. The following table identifies
which governing bodies have authority with respect to each type of Metro Plan amendment. This table is
based on Chapter IV of the Metro Plan (pages IV-1 IV-4). The portion below in ƵŶĚĞƌůŝŶĞĚŝƚĂůŝĐƐ applies to
the area subject to the proposed amendment.
Current Metro Plan Amendment Review Process
Location Type of Amendment Decision Making Authority
Inside City Limits Site specific diagram or site Home City 1
specific text amendments
Between City Limits and UGB Site specific diagram or site Home City and Lane County
specific text amendments
Non-Home City may elect to become
decision-maker if council determines
2
amendment has regional impact
ĞƚǁĞĞŶh'ĂŶĚDĞƚƌŽ^ŝƚĞƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐĚŝĂŐƌĂŵŽƌƐŝƚĞ^ĂŵĞĂƐĂďŽǀĞ
WůĂŶŽƵŶĚĂƌLJƐƉĞĐŝĨŝĐƚĞdžƚĂŵĞŶĚŵĞŶƚƐ
UGB or Metro Plan Boundary Boundary changes that do Same as above
changes not cross the Willamette or
McKenzie Rivers, or over a
ridge into a basin
UGB or Metro Plan Boundary Boundary changes that cross Lane County, City of Springfield and
changes the Willamette or McKenzie City of Eugene
Rivers, or crosses over a ridge
into a new basin
Not location specific Non-site specific text Lane County, City of Springfield and
amendments or amendments City of Eugene
that involve a goal exception
not related to UGB expansion
1
Springfield is home city on east side of I-5; Eugene is home city on west side of I-5.
2
A Metro Plan amendment is considered to have regional impact if:
(1) It will require an amendment to a jointly adopted functional plan (such as TransPlan or the Public Facility Plan) in
order to provide the subject property with an adequate level of urban services and facilities; EŽƚĞ͗tŝƚŚĂĨĞǁƌĂƌĞ
ĞdžĐĞƉƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƵƌďĂŶƐĞƌǀŝĐĞƐŵĂLJŽŶůLJďĞƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĚƚŽƵƌďĂŶůĂŶĚƐ;ůĂŶĚƐǁŝƚŚŝŶŝƚLJůŝŵŝƚƐͿ͘
(2) It has a demonstrable impact on the water, storm drainage, wastewater, or transportation facilities of the non-home
city; or
(3) It affects the buildable land inventory by significantly adding to Low Density Residential (LDR), Campus Industrial
(CI), Light-Medium Industrial (LMI), or Heavy Industrial (HI) designations or significantly reducing the Medium
Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), or Community Commercial (CC) designations.
[EŽƚĞ͗dŚĞƐĞƉůĂŶĚĞƐŝŐŶĂƚŝŽŶƐĂƌĞŽŶůLJĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞŝŶƐŝĚĞƚŚĞh'Ɛ͘]
Prepared by City of Eugene
August 16, 2011
Zoning and Land Use Code Administration
The following table identifies the jurisdiction responsible for administering zoning and land use (or
development) codes within the city limits, between the city limits and the UGB, between the UGB and the
Metro Plan Boundary, and outside of the Metro Plan boundary. Zoning and land use code administration
includes applying the code to development proposals and reviewing land use applications, such as land
divisions, conditional use permits, and re-zonings not processed concurrent with Metro Plan amendments.
No changes to zoning and land use code administration will occur as a result of the proposed amendment.
Zoning and Land Use Code Administration
Location Jurisdictional Responsibility/Decision Body
Inside City Limits City
Between City Limits and UGB City administers land use code jointly
adopted by Lane County and City
Between UGB and Metro Plan Boundary Lane County
Outside Metro Plan Boundary Lane County
Prepared by City of Eugene
August 16, 2011