HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 6: Ordinance Vacating a Portion of Moss Street
ECC
UGENE ITY OUNCIL
AIS
GENDA TEM UMMARY
Action: Ordinance Vacating a Portion of Moss Street Located between
thth
East 15 Avenue and East 17 Avenue (VRI 10-1)
Meeting Date: December 12, 2011 Agenda Item Number: 6
Department: Planning and Development Staff Contact: Steve Ochs
www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5453
ISSUE STATEMENT
The City Council is scheduled to take action on an ordinance on a vacation request submitted by the
University of Oregon for the portion of Moss Street located between East 15th Avenue and East 17th
Avenue.
BACKGROUND
On November 21, the City Council held a public hearing and held the record open for two weeks to
allow for additional testimony. The record closed on December 5, 2011, and the City Council set an
action date on the vacation for December 12, 2011.
As shown on the attached maps (see Attachments A and B), the University of Oregon’s requested right-
of-way vacation includes the portion of Moss Street located between East 15th Avenue and East 17th
Avenue. The University owns the property surrounding the subject right-of-way, and is intending to
reconfigure the street to allow for additional head-in parking in order to replace recently lost parking due
to construction of new facilities in the area.
Public testimony was received at the hearing, and in writing, during the open record period after the
hearing (see Attachment E). Copies of all written testimony have also been placed in a binder along with
other application materials in the council office, for reference.
Requests for the vacation of public streets and alleys are considered in accordance with sections 9.8700-
9.8725 of the Eugene Code (EC) and Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 271.080-271.230, and processed
pursuant to EC 9.7445–9.7455. The City conducted the public hearing in accordance with quasi-judicial
procedures in State law and as set forth in EC 9.7065 through EC 9.7095.
A draft ordinance (see Attachment C) has been provided to be acted on, relating to the proposed
vacation of the portion of Moss Street located between East 15th Avenue and East 17th Avenue.
Findings regarding the proposed vacations are attached and included as Exhibit C to the ordinance.
RELATED CITY POLICIES
The Eugene City Council will address the relevant approval criteria from EC 9.8725 in making a
decision on the proposed street vacation, as listed below:
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111212\S1112126.doc
The city council shall approve, or approve with conditions and reservations of easements, the
vacation of improved public right-of-way, public ways acquired with public funds, or
undeveloped subdivision and partition plats, or portions thereof, including public right-of-
way and improved public easements located therein, only if the council finds that approval of
the vacation is in the public interest.
Consent of the required area has been provided and public notice and the hearing has occurred in
accordance with statutory and local code requirements. The basic provision of necessary public services
and facilities such as transportation and utilities in the area will be maintained. The attached findings
demonstrate that the proposed vacation is consistent with city-wide neighborhood and University
policies. The vacation will enable the University to provide additional parking to replace parking that
has been lost due to recent construction of the East Campus residence hall. The resulting benefit of this
vacation is to reduce parking and transportation impacts on the surrounding area, while providing
convenient parking for students, faculty, visitors and guests. Additionally, the City will receive a
$1,856,000 assessment of benefit from the vacated right-of-way (see Attachment D) while adequate
public rights-of-way remain to satisfy all access and traffic circulation needs in the vicinity. Approval of
the vacation request is therefore found to be in the public interest as required by the approval criteria,
and consistent with the findings attached to the draft ordinance.
COUNCIL OPTIONS
The council may:
1.Adopt the ordinance as attached.
2.Adopt the ordinance with specific amendments.
3.Deny the ordinance.
CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION
The City Manager recommends that the City Council approve the vacation request and adopt the
ordinance as attached.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Move to adopt Council Bill No. 5052, an ordinance vacating the portion of Moss Street located between
thth
East 15 Avenue and East 17 Avenue.
ATTACHMENTS
A.Map of Street Vacation Request
B.Aerial Context Map of Street Vacation Request
C.Draft Ordinance (with Exhibits A – C) for Street Vacation
D.Moss Street Vacation Assessment Memorandum
E.Public Testimony
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111212\S1112126.doc
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Staff Contact: Steve Ochs
Telephone: 541-682-5453
Staff E-Mail: steve.p.ochs@ci.eugene.or.us
S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111212\S1112126.doc
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF MOSS STREET
THTH
LOCATED BETWEEN EAST 15 AVENUE AND EAST 17 AVENUE.
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that:
A.
On May 10, 2010, the University of Oregon, with the consent of the abutting
property owner(s), applied for vacation of the portion of the following described street:
thth
Portion of Moss Street extending from East 15 Avenue to East 17 Avenue. The
assessor’s maps and tax lots for the properties abutting the proposed street
vacation are: Assessor's Map 17-03-33-33, Tax Lots 7200, 7600, 7700, 7800,
7900, 8000, 8100, 8200, 8300, 8400; and Assessor’s Map 17-03-32-44, Tax Lot
1900, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to this Ordinance.
The street vacation is subject to the easements described in Exhibit B attached to
this Ordinance.
B.
The City Council of the City of Eugene has approved an agenda setting a public
hearing to be held at 7:30 p.m. on November 21, 2011, for the purpose of hearing protests and
remonstrances to the proposed vacation.
C.
On November 21, 2011, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the
street vacation.
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1
. The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that notice of the hearing was
published and posted as required by law, that the consent of the owner(s) of the abutting property
has been filed in the proceedings, and that the vacation of the street right-of-way is in the public
interest, as described in the Findings attached as Exhibit C to this Ordinance.
Section 2
. The street right-of-way described in Exhibit A attached to this Ordinance is
vacated subject to the easements described in Exhibit B attached to this Ordinance and shall
revert pursuant to the statutes of the State of Oregon.
Section 3
. The City Recorder is directed to file a certified copy of this Ordinance with
the Recorder of Lane County, Oregon, together with a map or plat of said property, and a
certified copy of this Ordinance shall be filed with the Lane County Assessor and another
certified copy shall be filed with the Lane County Surveyor.
Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this
th
12 day of December , 2011. _____ day of December, 2011.
__________________________________ ____________________________________
City Recorder Mayor
Ordinance - Page 1 of 1
Exhibit B, Page 1 of 2
Exhibit B, Page 2 of 2
Exhibit C
Findings:
Vacation of Moss Street
for the University of Oregon
(VRI 10--1)
Background
th
The University of Oregon’s requested right-of-way vacation includes Moss Street from East 15
th
Avenue south to East 17 Avenue. The area subject to the request is 1.35 acres (58,729 square feet).
The vacation request is part of the University of Oregon’s East Campus development plan which
involves the vacation of portions of Moss Street and Columbia Street from the City. The University
owns all properties that abut the right of way and is proposing to replace the existing on-street
parallel parking with head in parking along Moss Street. This will increase the parking supply
th
available for students, faculty and visitors. Segments of Moss Street north of 15 and Columbia
th
Street just south of East 13 Avenue have been previously vacated and similarly converted to
provide head in parking.
The vacation request process provides a means to evaluate the need for public ways as land
develops and uses change over time, and to address the manner in which the City may dispense with
public ways. Requests for the vacation of public streets and alleys are considered in accordance
with EC 9.8700-9.8725 and Oregon Revised Statutes 271.080-271.230. These requests are also
subject to procedural requirements at EC 9.7445–9.7455.
Compliance with Approval Criteria
The sole approval criterion at EC 9.8725 requires the City Council to find that approval of the
requested right-of-way vacations is in the public interest. The full text of the approval criterion is
provided below, with findings demonstrating compliance:
The city council shall approve, or approve with conditions and reservations of
easements, the vacation of improved public right-of-way, public ways acquired with
public funds, or undeveloped subdivision and partition plats, or portions thereof,
including public right-of-way and improved public easements located therein, only if
the council finds that approval of the vacation is in the public interest.
Public notice of the hearing for the vacation request has been provided in accordance with
applicable statutory and local code requirements. Consent for the vacation requests from abutting
and affected owners, and payment of a special assessment for the area of vacated right-of-way, have
also been provided as required.
Moss Street Vacation Findings
th
The following findings demonstrate that vacation of the portion of Moss Street between East 15
th
Avenue and East 17 Avenue is in the public interest. This determination is based on the conclusion
thth
that the vacation of the portion of Moss Street between East 15 Avenue and East 17 Avenue is
consistent with all applicable adopted policies, will provide efficient use of land and will not
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 1
negatively impact the transportation system, surrounding neighborhoods or emergency access.
Additionally, future planned development opportunities on the University of Oregon campus can be
enhanced through the consolidation of the site. As a result, vacation of the requested street segment
will be in the public interest. Detailed findings to support these conclusions are provided below.
The requested vacation is related to major campus construction projects that have recently occurred
on the University including the Matthew Knight Arena, Alumni Center and Academic Learning
Center all of which have displaced existing parking in the campus area. Most recently, the East
Campus Residence Hall is under construction which is displacing 311 parking spaces on campus
which had been used for student, faculty and visitor parking. The University’s 2010 Parking Plan
replaces the lost supply of parking east and north of campus. Parking areas included in this plan that
have been constructed include; the Northside Parking Project located north of Franklin Boulevard
on Riverfront Parkway (150 spaces); the Matthew Knight Arena Site Parking Garage (375 spaces);
the former ODOT site and Romania SUV lot (196 spaces); Villard Alley Parking (56 spaces) and
the Moss Street head in parking, which would include 107 spaces and is the subject of this vacation
request. This street vacation request is therefore part of an overall plan to mitigate the impact of the
recent parking losses on areas surrounding the University.
Public Works staff has confirmed that adequate public rights-of-way exist to satisfy all access and
traffic circulation needs in the vicinity. While the applicant notes that Moss Street will remain a
two-way through street and the existing street width will be maintained, if vacated, Moss Street will
not be required to remain open as a public street. While this street configuration will not be
required to remain open as a public street, adjacent uses are all owned by the University and as
necessary, adequate access including emergency access will be required through future building
permits if the area redevelops. Adjacent uses on Moss Street include the new East Campus
Residence Hall on the west side of Moss Street and the Moss Street Child Development Center on
the east side of the street. The vacation of Moss Street will not cause additional out of direction
th
travel as it is not a through street and ends in a “T” intersection at East 15 Avenue. Vehicles and
bicyclists would need to go to Villard Street to the east or Agate Street to the west to reach a
through connections north to Franklin Boulevard with or without the vacation.
Referral comments from Public Works staff, other affected City Departments and utility providers
note that the provision of necessary public services and facilities such as transportation and utilities
in the area can be maintained upon approval of the vacation request. The City’s Public Works
Transportation and Engineering staff and the Fire Marshal’s office have confirmed that the
vacations would not compromise transportation or emergency access. Referral comments and letters
of concurrence from utility providers confirm that water and natural gas lines located in the street
can be maintained by providing easements to EWEB and Northwest Natural Gas.
Related City Policies – There are adopted policies in the Metro Plan and the applicable refinement
plan (Fairmount/ U of O Special Area Study as amended by Ordinance 20312 and Ordinance
20460) that are relevant to the request. While these policies are not mandatory approval criteria,
consistency with these policies demonstrates that the request is in the public interest. As described
below the proposed vacation is consistent with relevant policies.
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 2
Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan Policies
Transportation Element Policy F.7 (Page III-F-6)
Increase the use of motor vehicle parking management strategies in selected areas through-out
the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area.
Parking management strategies are programs that result in the more efficient use of parking
resources. The vacation request and redevelopment to increase the parking supply is an element of a
larger parking plan which replaces parking lost by recent construction projects on the University
campus. This parking plan implements several known parking management strategies by; Providing
for shared parking for students, faculty, visitors and event attendees at Hayward Field and the
Matthew Knight arena; Regulating parking, as parking in these lots will be limited and/or metered;
Increasing capacity of existing parking facilities, as reconfiguration of existing on-street parallel
spaces to smaller head in spaces will almost double the number of spaces available on Moss Street
thth
between East 15 Avenue and East 17 Avenue (from approximately 60 spaces to 107 spaces). As
parking management strategies are being and will be implemented, the request is consistent with
this policy.
Transportation Element Policy F.13 (Page III-F-7)
Support transportation strategies that enhance neighborhood livability.
The 2010 University of Oregon Parking Plan reorganizes the parking supply east and north of
campus. The parking plan, when combined with parking management strategies and residential
parking programs, will help to reduce the pressure on the use of neighborhood residential streets for
extended parking, and reduce the amount of cut-through traffic looking for parking over the long
term. This strategy will help to enhance neighborhood livability consistent with this policy.
Public Facilities and Services Element Policy G.4 (Page III-G-5)
The cities and Lane County shall coordinate with EWEB, SUB and special service districts
operating in the Metropolitan area, to provide the opportunity to review and comment on
proposed public facilities, plans, programs, and public improvement projects or changes thereto
that may affect on another’s area of responsibility.
The City provided referrals to EWEB, Northwest Natural Gas and other service providers as part of
the vacation process. EWEB and Northwest Natural Gas both have facilities in the existing right of
way and have requested easements to protect their facilities. Easements will be retained as
necessary to protect these facilities, consistent with this policy.
Fairmount / U of O Special Study Area Policies (Fairmount SAS)
University of Oregon Lands Policies (East Campus Area) Policy 1 (As added by page 9 of
Ordinance 20312)
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 3
The City of Eugene and the Fairmount Neighbors recognize the current University-adopted East
Campus Policy as a statement of University Policy.
The University of Oregon’s 2003 Development Policy for the East Campus Area updated in 2004 is
the adopted East Campus Policy. The document contains seven policy elements which guide
development in the area. The City recognizes this plan as a statement of University Policy.
University of Oregon Lands Policies (East Campus Area) Policy 2 (Page 25 Fairmount SAS)
The City shall encourage the University to use its property in East Campus in an orderly
fashion: intensity of use will be greatest near the already dense Central Campus Area (Agate
th
Street and 15 Avenue) and become less intense as properties approach low-density residential
uses.
The requested vacation will allow the University to provide additional parking adjacent to the new
East Campus residence hall and in proximity to other University uses including the Matthew Knight
Arena and Hayward field. The use of the area for parking and access provides for an efficient use of
the area consistent with this policy.
University of Oregon Lands Policies (East Campus Area) Policy 3 (Page 25 Fairmount SAS)
The City shall encourage the University to use its land currently zoned PL (Public Land
District) with energy and space efficient structures and land-use patterns.
The area surrounding the vacation is currently zoned PL (Public Land). The creation of head in
parking along the vacated portion of the street will increase the number of parking spaces available
within the same area. This will allow a more efficient use of the land, consistent with this policy.
Traffic Circulation Policy2 (Page 42 Fairmount SAS, renumbered to Traffic Circulation Policy 1 by
Ordinance 20460)
The adverse effects of motor vehicle movement shall be mitigated as much as possible.
The requested vacation of Moss Street is part of the 2010 University of Oregon Parking Plan which
reorganizes the supply of parking in the east and north campus area. The plan is an effort to replace
parking that will be lost due to recent construction projects thereby lessening the University related
parking impacts and cut-through traffic impacts on the residential neighborhoods surrounding the
University. The vacation of Moss Street will not cause additional out of direction travel as it is not a
th
through street and ends with a “T” intersection at East 15 Avenue. Vehicles and bicyclists would
need to go to Villard Street to the east or Agate Street to the west to reach through connections
north to Franklin Boulevard, regardless of the vacation.
A portion of the parking spaces resulting from the vacation could be used for Matthew Knight
Arena parking. To address parking and traffic specifically related to arena events, the City,
Fairmount Neighbors and University entered into a legal agreement called the “Arena Impact
Mitigation Agreement”. The agreement incorporates a Transportation Demand Management Plan
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 4
(TDM) Plan which includes traffic control plans, and an event parking district was created that
implements a residential parking permit program for the Fairmount Residential area during arena
events. If mitigation is found to be insufficient, the agreement may be modified to address these
issues. In this manner, adverse effects related to arena specific events can be addressed. Given the
findings above, the proposal is consistent with this policy.
Traffic Circulation Policy 9 (As added on Page 4 of Ordinance 20312 and renumbered as Traffic
Circulation Policy 7 by Ordinance 20460)
With the exception of alleys, vacations of streets within the state approved University East
Campus boundary should not be permitted, unless the applicant, at his or her expense, provides
to the City a local street connection study that demonstrates how the proposed street system
remaining after such vacation meets the intent of the Eugene Code Street connectivity
provisions and that such vacation will not increase traffic volumes on local residential streets.
The applicant provided a local street connectivity study prepared by Branch Engineering. The study
addresses Eugene Code street connectivity provisions found at EC 9.6815. The study concludes that
after the street vacation, the street system will meet the intent of the street connectivity provisions.
Additionally, the local street study notes that the vacation of Moss Street will not increase traffic
volumes in the surrounding neighborhoods consistent with this policy.
Parking Policy 1 (Page 45 Fairmount SAS)
Steps shall be taken to gain better use of existing off-street parking areas and to discourage
long-term storage of vehicles on the street.
As proposed, the vacation will allow the University to create additional off-street parking areas as
once under private ownership the spaces will not be considered on-street spaces. The creation of
additional parking spaces will increase the overall availability of off-street parking in the area,
consistent with this policy.
Parking Policy 3 (Page 45 Fairmount SAS)
The adverse effects of motor vehicle storage shall be mitigated as much as possible.
As noted above, the vacation will allow the University to create additional off-street parking areas
and combined with the parking district in the nearby residential areas will help to discourage long-
term storage of vehicles, consistent with this policy.
Parking Policy 4 (As amended on Page 4 of Ordinance 20312)
Parking Systems adopted for any area within the Special Area Study should avoid creating
parking problems for any other area or land use of the Fairmount Neighborhood by mitigating
parking impacts on the surrounding neighborhood as directed by the City.
The request does not include the adoption of a parking system. To the extent this policy is
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 5
applicable to this vacation request, the proposal will allow an increase in the availability of off-
street spaces which in turn should decrease and not increase parking problems for other areas,
consistent with this policy.
Conclusion
Based on the available information, evidence and testimony received, the City finds that the right-
thth
of-way vacation for Moss Street between East 15 Avenue and East 17 Avenue as proposed by the
University of Oregon (VRU 10-1), will be in the public interest.
Exhibit C: Findings
Page 6
ATTACHMENTD
Public Works
Engineering
City of Eugene
99 E. Broadway, Suite 400
M
Eugene, Oregon 97401
EMORANDUM
(541) 682-5291
(541) 682-5032 FAX
Date: August 26, 2011
To: Lisa Gardner, Planning Director
Cc: Steve Ochs, Associate Planner
From: Russ Royer, Senior Real Property Officer
Subject:Moss Street Vacation Assessment
In preparation for the upcoming vacation hearing Steve Ochs asked that I prepare and send to your attention a
summary of the basis of value for the proposed assessment of the segment of Moss Street right of way between
thth
15 Avenue and 17 Avenue which is to be vacated by the City to the U of O. As you may recall there was a
basis of value report prepared by a City staff appraiser and also an appraisal prepared by a private appraisal firm
(Duncan & Brown) at the request of the University of Oregon.
The valuation reports resulted in a number of meetings with City staff, U of O staff, and the appraisers. The
participating City and the University staff agreed to recommend the final negotiated assessment of $1,856,000.
The initial assessment prepared by City staff concluded a total assessment value of $2,136,000, while the
estimate of value by the appraisal firm contracted by the University estimated a value of $1,590,000. Both the
City and private appraisers were using the same or similar comparable sales data to estimate the unencumbered
market value of the vacation areas. The variance in value tended to result from assumptions of the appraisers
and their perception of the immediate demand relative to market supply. The expected market demand
resulted in additional discounting of value by the private appraiser. In addition there were utility easements
that needed to be reserved on portions of the subject vacation area. The market value of the subject area was
discounted to recognize the impact of the reserved easements and the resulting diminution of value to the
encumbered areas.
The following summarizes the adjustments for market absorption and the impacts of the reserved easement:
Total area of right of way to be vacated is approximately 58,729 square feet being about 80 feet wide by 734
feet long. Thus half or about 29,364 sq ft will benefit each side of the street which has 2 different values
because of the parcel sizes and resulting market absorption discounts.
Both appraisals began from a base unit price of $40 per square foot, before discounting for easements or market
absorption.
D & B applied a 15% annual discount rate to both parcels to address their estimated market absorption of 1.3
acres per year. This yielded a discounted unencumbered value of $28.75 per sq ft for the larger 13.1 acre parcel
on the west side of Moss Street and $37.70 per sq ft for the smaller 2.6 acre parcel on the east side of Moss. It
is assumed half of the r/w vacated would benefit the properties on each side of the street, thus $28.75 and
$37.70 per sq ft to the respective sides.
Both the City and the Duncan & Brown appraisals discounted the areas of the proposed utility easements by
25%. It was proposed to reserve a 15’ easement on each side of the proposed vacation for a gas line (east side)
and a waterline (west side). The D&B appraisal further discounted the remaining area between the 2 easements
by 25% as they believed it would be similarly restricted because of the resulting narrow shape limiting how it
could be developed. As it appears based on proposed development the present highest and best use will
continue to be as parking and a driveway in which case the narrow shape would limit such use. And to further
mitigate the perceived damage to the area between the 2 easements it is believed reasonable to conclude the
gas line can be moved into the westerly easement and run parallel to the waterline. It was explained to be a
small gas pipe. EWEB explained it was their understanding there would need to be a 3 foot separation between
the gas and waterline. As such, it might be reasonable to increase the 15 foot utility easement by the extra 3
feet from the 15’ proposed easement to 18’. This would assume a horizontal separation and provide the same
distance on the outside of both of the pipes in the after condition. If vertical separation were used it could
minimize the additional easement area. But for this analysis, we are assuming adding the 3 feet horizontal
separation. This results in the following vacation assessments:
Easterly half. 29,364 square feet of the right of way at the D & B market absorption adjusted rate of $37.70 per
sq ft yielding $1,107,022
Westerly half. 16,148 sq ft (22’ x 734’) unencumbered at the D & B market absorption adjusted rate of $28.75
per sq ft yielding $464,255
The 18’ x 734’ (13,212 sq ft) to be encumbered by a utility easement for the water and gas lines at $21.56 (75%
of $28.75) per sq ft yielding $284,850
Total estimated assessment recognizing the D & B market absorption rates and related discounting along with
combining the utility easements. $1,856,000 (rounded from $1,856,127)**
The City’s original estimate of assessment of special benefit was $2,136,000 based on $40 per sq ft with 25%
adjustment for easements.
D & B’s revised estimate dated 9/16/10 after deleting an emergency vehicle access and adjusting to 2 – 15’
easements yielded $1,590,000.
As a point of reference, the mean of the 2 values would be $1,863,000.
** The recommended final proposed assessment of $1,856,000 was concluded as a mutually acceptable
administrative settlement by city and university staff and is supported on the findings of both appraiser’s
reports. The assessment further assumed using one 18’ utility easement as opposed to two 15’ easements.