Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem A: Boards and Commissions ECC UGENE ITY OUNCIL AIS GENDA TEM UMMARY Work Session: Boards and Commissions Meeting Date: January 11, 2012 Agenda Item Number: A Department: Central Services Staff Contact: Beth Forrest www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 541-682-5882 ISSUE STATEMENT This work session is part of an ongoing opportunity for the City Council to discuss how it conducts its business. The council meets periodically to talk about its processes and operating agreements. The particular focus of this meeting is on boards, commissions, and committees. BACKGROUND The council previously affirmed three “best outcomes” for advisory groups: 1)Representation The makeup of boards, commissions and committees should over time represent the richness of our community’s perspectives, neighborhoods, and population demographics – race and ethnicity, gender, age, socioeconomic class, dis/ability and other factors. 2)Board, commission and committee member development Advisory group members are effective and feel satisfied because they have the training and support to be successful contributors – both before becoming candidates for vacancies and following their appointments. 3)Recruitment and selection Communication and procedures associated with outreach, recruitment, interviews, selection and appointments are fair, accessible, transparent and civil. In June 2011, the council held a process session during which issues related to the City’s boards and commission recruitment and selection process were discussed. With the annual recruitment process starting up in January 2012, this work session presents an opportunity to review the proposed schedule for recruitment and consider any changes to the process that will encourage a diverse applicant pool, make the interview process more effective and welcoming, and result in appointments that reflect the council’s goals around broad community involvement. BCC Recruitment Schedule The 2012 BCC recruitment is scheduled to begin on January 17, 2012. Initial publicity will include a press release, newspaper ad and web notification, including information about specific openings. In addition, staff liaisons and current committee members will be asked to do outreach to potential candidates and publicize the openings. The recruitment period will close on March 30, 2012. S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M120111\S120111A.doc Interviews have tentatively been set for May 1 and 2 and will follow the same format as recent interviews, with candidates being given time at the beginning of their interview to present their qualifications and reasons for applying. Predetermined follow-up questions will then be asked by the councilors. Appointments will be scheduled for June 11, 2012. Role of advisory groups in making recommendations for appointment Questions have been raised about the appropriate roles of advisory groups and of their incumbent members in making recommendations to the Mayor and council on selection of applicants for interviews and appointments. Several advisory groups have a practice of weighing in on these appointments, with the understanding that the ultimate decision rests with the council. The council binders this year will contain not only applications, but templates with information on each group’s purpose, current focus, number of openings, and the knowledge, skills and abilities considered essential for effectiveness. These templates are intended to provide relevant information to help the council, and serve as an alternative or addition to recommendations for or against any particular individuals. Update on Recording and Webcasting BCC Meetings State of Oregon law requires that meeting records be maintained for public bodies and that sound, video or digital recording or written minutes may be used to satisfy this requirement. At a minimum, the record of the meeting must include the name of the group; date, time and location of meeting; names of advisory group members in attendance and absent; a reference to any document discussed at the meeting, and decisions, recommendations and actions. Meeting records are made accessible through the City website, and can be provided in alternate formats. At this time, the City’s advisory groups employ a wide range of methods to record meetings. As funds for providing written minutes are reduced, alternatives such as single-frame video recording have become more viable. Initiatives are underway to enhance video capability for the entire City organization, and to provide departments with resources to perform some level of audio- and video- recording and storage for advisory groups. RELATED CITY POLICIES Elements of this item relate to the council goal of “effective, accountable municipal government.” COUNCIL OPTIONS The council may provide input and direction for staff follow-up on the issues discussed. No formal action is anticipated. CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION No recommendations are offered by the City Manager. SUGGESTED MOTION No suggested motions are offered by the City Manager. S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M120111\S120111A.doc ATTACHMENTS A. Boards and Commissions Matrix B. Boards and Commissions Demographic Information C. Comparison of Recruitment and Selection Process by Jurisdiction FOR MORE INFORMATION Staff Contact: Beth Forrest Telephone: 541-682-5882 Staff E-Mail: beth.l.forrest@ci.eugene.or.us S:\CMO\2012 Council Agendas\M120111\S120111A.doc 2011 Boards and Commissions Member Demographics 2011 BCC Members # of Committee: members (Ward) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UGB Budget Committee 8 0 2 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 Civilian Review Board 7 3 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 Historic Review Board 7 2 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 Human Rights Commission 14 3 3 0 1 0 0 2 2 1 LRAPA Board of Directors 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Workforce Partnership 9 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 Library Board 6 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Planning Commission 7 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 1 0 Police Commission 10 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 Sustainability Commission 13 2 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 3 Toxics Board 7 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 Whilamut Natural Area Citizen Planning Committee 10 1 2 2 1 1 0 3 0 0 Total 102 15 15 15 11 7 7 12 4 7 2011 BCC Demographics Historic Review Civilian Review Human Rights Sustainability Library Board Commission Toxics Board CommissionCommissionCommissionCommission W.N.A.C.P. CommitteeCommittee Planning M.W.M udget Police LRAPA L.W.P. BoardBoard B Totals Sex M 4 5 1 5 2 6 1 1 7 6 8 3 5 54 F 4 2 5 7 1 3 3 1 0 4 4 3 5 43 Age 19-25 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 4 26-35 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 12 36-45 4 5 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 23 46-55 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 0 4 19 56-65 2 1 0 4 0 1 0 1 4 3 3 1 2 22 65+ 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 6 Ethnicity African American 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 American Indian/ Alaskan Native 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Asian/ Pacific Islander 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Did not respond 0 1 1 2 1 7 0 1 0 2 2 3 2 22 Hispanic 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 5 Middle Eastern 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Multiracial 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 White/ European American 8 4 4 6 2 2 4 1 7 6 10 2 8 64 Continued on reverse side 2011 Boards and Commissions Member Demographics 2011 BCC Demographics Historic Review Civilian Review Human Rights Sustainability Library Board Commission Toxics Board CommissionCommissionCommissionCommission W.N.A.C.P. CommitteeCommittee Planning M.W.M Budget Police LRAPA L.W.P. BoardBoard Totals Disability 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Neighborhood Active Bethel Citizens 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 7 Amazon Neighbors 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 5 Cal Young Neighborhood 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 1 0 2 9 Churchill Area Neighborhood 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 6 Crest Drive Citizens 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 8 Southeast Neighbors 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 Downtown Neighborhood Association 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Far West Neighborhood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 Fairmount Neighbors 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 Friendly Area Neighbors 0 2 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 10 Harlow Neighbors 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 Jefferson Westside Neighbors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Laurel Hill Valley Citizens 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 River Road Community Organization 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 Santa Clara Community Organization 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 South University Neighborhood Association 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Trainsong Neighbors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 West University Neighbors 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Whiteaker Community Council 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 None 0 1 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 12 How Did You Hear? Web Site 1 3 0 1 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 Friend 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 3 1 3 17 Word of Mouth 5 1 6 8 2 8 2 1 5 7 7 5 6 63 Newspaper 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 Mail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ATTACHMENT C Comparison of recruitment and selection processes by jurisdiction Eugene, Oregon  Annual recruitment process for all vacancies on standing council committees  Terms begin July 1  Recruitment begins mid-January and continues until the end of March  Full council reviews applications, completes interview and appointment ballot, attends interviews (early-May), and completes final appointment ballot  Appointments made at City Council meeting in June  Advertising: press release; web announcement; newspaper ad; neighborhood association newsletters and events; City-sponsored events Salem, Oregon  Recruits for vacancies on an as-needed basis.  Terms begin on January 1 or July 1.  Council subcommittee (Mayor plus two councilors) reviews applications and makes recommendation on appointments.  Advertising: citywide newsletter (mailer) three times annually; recreation guide; neighborhood association newsletters Springfield, Oregon  Recruits for vacancies on an as-needed basis.  Term start dates vary by committee.  Full council interviews for Budget Committee, Planning Commission, and Historic Commission  All others, staff and committee interview, make recommendation to council  Advertising: media advisory about vacancy