Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAttachment Git appears they have misplaced or misfiled these proposaWhile there is still time for DLCD to review the proposal before it is considered by the elected officials, you do yourselves and the public a disservice if you make a recommendation without the opportunity to review all relevant information.” “By removing approximately 8,200 acres of rural residential, forested, agricultural, and sensitive riparian areas from the metro plan are east of I-5, there will no longer be any basiscoordinated planning between LC and the City of Springfield.Coordination will be replaced with autonomy according to the staff report.” “coordination will be replaced with autonomy”. “transparent it is also unclear if, or why, F2 rather that F1 zoning will be applied on some areas designated as forestland.” 1 While not actually a criterion listed within the Metro Plan, Lane Code Chapter 12.225(2)(b) (Criteria for a approval of a Metro Plan amendment) requires that: Adoption of [an] amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. Local governments are not required to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a PAPA unless the PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. For purposes of this section, a PAPA would affect a Goal 5 resource only if: (a) The PAPA creates or amends a resource list or a portion of an acknowledged plan or land use regulation adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5; (b) The PAPA allows new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular significant Goal 5 resource site on an acknowledged resource list; or (c) The PAPA amends an acknowledged UGB and factual information is submitted demonstrating that a resource site, or the impact areas of such a site, is included in the amended UGB area. interfaces between both sides of the UGB are the most contentious issues brought forth to the CommissionFor a fair and just evaluation of this boundary area, all jurisdictions must be involved to represent all of the public’s concerns.” “will reduce inter-governmental collaboration in key areas to balance conservation of ‘green infrastructure’ and future urban development.” “make decisions of regional importance and impact without official oversight and free from troublesome public scrutiny”. o o o o o o o o o o Metro Plan ŝƚLJŽĨƵŐĞŶĞZĞƐƉŽŶƐĞ͗Testimonyfrom1000FriendsofOregonandLauriSegelVaccherraise legitimateissueswithregardtothedraftfindingsregardingtheƉƌŽƉŽƐĂů͛Ɛconsistencywith otherpartsoftheMetroPlan.However,itisnotclearthattheproposalwouldnecessarily createaninternalinconsistencyorotherwisefailtoadequatelyaddressapplicablecriteria. Priortofinalactionbytheelectedofficials,LaneCountystaff(astheprimarystaffforthe proposal)haveadditionalopportunitiestosupplementthedraftfindingstoaddresstheissues raisedsothat,iftheproposedamendmentisultimatelyapprovedandappealedtoLUBA,the recordwillincludefindingstoassisttheCountyandSpringfieldinprovidingalegaldefense.