Laserfiche WebLink
EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY <br /> <br />Work Session: Resolution 4826 Adopting Ice and Snow Removal Policies and Repealing <br /> Resolution No. 4278 <br /> <br />Meeting Date: February 28, 2005 Agenda Item Number: B <br />Department: Public Works Staff Contact: Jeff Lankston <br />www. cl. eugene, or. us Contact Telephone Number: 682-4813 <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br />This is a work session requested by the Public Works Department to consider revision of the current Ice <br />and Snow Removal Policy. A policy change would allow the use of anti-icing and de-icing agents for <br />the purpose of ice and snow control on specified street sections. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />On January 12, 2004, the council approved Resolution 4784, essentially amending Resolution 4278, <br />which was passed in 1991 and which did not allow for the use of anti-icing or de-icing agents for the <br />purpose of ice and snow control on streets. Resolution 4784 was adopted on a temporary basis through <br />April 1, 2005. This resolution allows the use of anti-icing and de-icing agents on streets for the purpose <br />of ice and snow control. Prior to being used, these products needed to be approved by the City Manager. <br /> <br />Before Resolution 4784, sanding rock was the only material used for traction control. The application of <br />sand is a reactive approach to ice and snow control in that sand is only applied when freezing conditions <br />exist. Displacement of sand by vehicles and wind makes application prior to freezing conditions <br />ineffective. Sanding for traction control has economic and environmental ramifications. Although sand <br />is relatively inexpensive, a significant portion of ice and snow control costs are related to placing <br />abrasives on the streets and then cleaning them up. Depending on the severity of the storm, several <br />applications may be necessary on snow and ice routes. By using anti-icing and de-icing agents for ice <br />and snow control, cost reductions are anticipated due to the reduction in repeat applications and the <br />elimination of the clean-up process. <br /> <br />Environmental impacts due to excessive sand use are also of concern. Dust particles created by vehicles <br />crushing sanding rock can cause air quality concerns. For example, Denver, Colorado, has been cited by <br />the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for excessive particulate matter (PM 10), otherwise known <br />as brown cloud. Denver is now required to use liquid ice and snow control materials to maintain <br />appropriate air quality conformity and compliance to EPA standards. Other cities and counties require <br />liquid agents to meet EPA standards. Silt build-up in waterways from sand entering the stormwater <br />system is another environmental concern. Sediment runoff can harm aquatic life and vegetation. An <br />effort to clean up abrasives is made following all weather events to minimize property, personal and <br />environmental damages. However, all material is not reclaimed due to displacement onto road shoulders <br />and into stormwater inlets. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2005 Council Agendas\M050228\S050228B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />