Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ ~, <br />..,1 <br />1 ~'\ <br />UV <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />REPORTS Of OffiCERS <br /> <br />;<3 <br /> <br />MAYOR EARL MCNuTT SUBMITTED THE NAME OF J. J~ CHIARAMONTE TO FILL A VACANCY NOW EXISTING ON <br />THE CITY PLUMBING BOARD FOR THE BALANCE,OF THE CALENDAR YEAR, 1948. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />" <br />'...;..;V <br /> <br />, ' <br />..... I T WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY 'CRYM~AKER THAT THE APPO I'NTMENT BE CONF I RMED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. <br /> <br />CoI, <br />OC A REPORT ~F THE CITY MANAGER RE: PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR TREE REMOVAL AT HENDRICKS PARK, WAS <br />4 SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"THE FOLLOWING PROVISIONS ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN ANY CONTRACT RELATIVE TO CUTTING AND REMOVING <br />OF TREES IN THE HENDRICKS PA~K A~EA. <br /> <br />I. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AND PROPERLY MARKEO BY A <br />REPRESENT'ATI'VE OF THE CITY PARK DEPARTMENT. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />2~ STUMPS MUST BE CLOSE-CUT AT GROUND LEVEL AT HIGH SIDE OF SLOPE. <br /> <br />3. CONTRACTOR IS TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANING AND BURNING OF ALL BRJSH AN~ <br />DEBRIS ACCUMULATED IN THE OPERATION; SUCH DEBRIS TO BE PILED AT A SAFE DISTANCE <br />FROM STANDING TREES 'AND ALL BURNING TO BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE fIRE <br />DEPARTMENT. <br /> <br />4. CONTRACTOR- SHALL FURN "SH A PERFORMANCE BOND FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE AND A T I ME <br />LIMIT SHA(('&E SET F6~'COMPCETION OF S~CH OPERATION. <br /> <br />5. THE WORK IS TO BE CARRIED pN UNDER THE INSPECTION OF A CITY REPRESENTATIVE AND <br />PROVISION MADE THAT THE CITY MAY HALT SUCH OPERATIONS IMMEplATELY UPON GIVING <br />NOTICE TO THE CONTRACTOR." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY BAILEY, S~~ONDED BY DAVI~ THAT THE REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER BE RECEIVED AND <br /> <br />PLACED ON FILE. <br /> <br />., ... <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER RE: S~LE OF SMAL\L GENERATING' PLANT ACQUIRED BY THE CITY WITH <br />5 THE PURCHASE OF THE MILL RACE, WAi SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />"WITH THE PURCHASe: OF THE MILL 'RACE 'FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY PURPOSE,S, THE CITY ACQUIRED THE <br />SMALL GENERATING PCANT OF THE EUGEN"E POWER COMPANY AND SINCE THAT DATE, A'CTING UPON THE INSTRUCTIONS'. <br />OF THE COUNCIL, THIS OFFICE HAS MADE NUMEROUS CONTACTS WITH FIRMS AND INDIVIDUALS LOOKING TO THE <br />SALE AND DISPOSITION OF THE GENERATING PLANT. AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED INTEREST, AS'IDE FROM <br />DEALERS IN USED EQUIPMENT OF THIS TYPE, HAS BEEN THE STATE PRISON AT SALEM. DRAWINGS, BLUEPRINTS <br />AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED BUT NO ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN OVER A PERIOD OF SEVERAL MONTHS. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />.;. <br /> <br />I NOW HAVE AT HAND A LETTE~, PROPOSED FORM OF OPTION, TOGETHER WITH CERTIFIED CHECK FROM <br />'.':"MR. HENRY BERK, CONSULTING ENGINEER O'F PORTLAND, OREGON WHO IS PRE'SENTLY ENGAGED IN A SURVEY FOR <br />THREE CLIENTS WHO ARE PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT A SMALL'~ENERATING PLANT. THE OFFER FOR THE EQUIP- <br />MENT IS IN THE SUM OF $7500.00. fROM THEBEST INFORMATION THAT I HAVE IT WOULD APPEAR THAT THE <br />EQUIPMENT WOULD COMMAND A PRICE BETWEEN 87500 AND $9000 PROVIDED THAT' A PURCHASER CAN BE FOUND <br />. ' <br />WHOSE REQUIREMENTSMIGHT FIT THE DESIGN AND CAPACITY OF THE EQUIPMENT. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />THE OPTION HAS BEEN PRESENTED IN LIEU OF A DIRECT OFFER TO PURCHASE BY VIRTUE OF THE FACT <br />THAT A SURVEY WOULD' HAVE TO BE. COMPLETED BY THEENGINEERS BEFORE FINAL DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE <br />AS TO WHETHER OR NOT T'HE EQUIPMENT ON HAND WILL MEET PURCHASER'S RE'QUIREMENTS." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER BE RECEIVED AND PLACED <br />ON ~ILE, THAT MR. BERK'S OPTION BE REJECTED AND THAT HE .BE NOTIFIED THAT THE CITY WOULD CONSIDER <br />AN OFFER OF $7500 FOR THE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE SIXTY DAY PERIOD BUT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO HOLD THE <br />EQUIPMENT FOR SALE OR BID DURING THIS PERIOO. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />A REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCES GOVERNING VAGRANCY AND PUBLIC SOLICI- <br />TATION, WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />""AT'THE REQUEST OF THE CHIEF OF POLICE, I AM SUBMITTING HEREWITH A ROUGH DRAFT O~ PROPOSED <br />ORDINANpES 90VERNING VAGRANCY AND PUBLIC SOLICITATION ON THE STREETS WHICH ARE NOT INCLUDED AT <br />THE PRESENT TIME IN OUR CITY CODE. <br /> <br />. " <br />"I SHOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND AT THIS TIME THAT THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THECITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE <br />SUCH ORDINANCES IN REGULAR FORM FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COMMON COUNCIL AT AN~EARLY DATE." <br /> <br />IT WAS MOVED BY HAWN, SECONDED BY DAVIS THAT THE REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER BE RECEIVED AND PLACED, <br />ON FILE ANb THAT T~t ORDINANCES BE DRAWN AND REFERRED TO tHE J~DI~IARY COMMITTEE FOR CONSIDERATION. <br />MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ <br />