|
<br /> 7~
<br /> ii..
<br /> ::I .- -- - - --,-_. ~.,,-,- .,.-,,--,'- ~-~-" --.. _. - ...
<br /> H' -,--,-_. --.._- ,-- - --_.,-" - '----' ---- ~'."._- _._- 0-' _ ___ ' "
<br /> .. ". -----,- .'.--,- -.-" '." ---. ,-..,-,----.--..-.- '--, ---'-'-"-- -
<br /> BEFORE FINAL DECISION WAS MADE ON THE PURCHASE OF THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY, IT WAS
<br /> RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY MANAGER AGAIN CONTACT MR. MCKY IN AN ENDEAVOR TO WORK OUT A
<br /> BETTER SOLUTION WHEREIN THE CITY WOULD NOT BE PUT TO SUCH A HEAVY EXPENDITURE OF CAPITAL
<br /> OUTLAY FUNDS IN PROCURING THIS PROPERTY. IT WAS GENERALLY AGREED THAT THE PROCUREMENT
<br /> OF THIS PROPERTY FOR FUTURE RIVER FRONT DEVELOPMENT WAS DESIRABLE IF IT COULD BE WORKED
<br /> OUT FINANCIALLY. IT WAS ALSO BROUGHT OUT THAT THIS PROPERTY WAS IN THE R-3, MULTIPLE
<br /> I FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT WHICH WOULD NOT PERMIT THE ERECTION AND USE OF AN ASPHAL T
<br /> I PLANT OR GRAVEL BUSINESS AS PROPOSED BY THE CENTRAL HEATING COMPANY WHO ARE ENDEAVORING
<br /> TO BUY THIS PROPERTY FROM MR. MCKY AT A PRICE OF $30,000.
<br /> 2. THE C I TV MANAGER RECOMMENDED THAT THE FOLLOWING FIVE PIECES OF PROPERTY BE BID IN
<br /> I BY THE CITY OF EUGENE AT THE FORTHCOMING FORECLOSURE SALE UNDER THE BANCROFT PROCEDURE.
<br /> PRIN. I NT. 10/15/51 I
<br /> & TO I
<br /> A. LOTS 7 AND 8 IN BLOCK 22, CHAMBERS
<br /> i
<br /> ADDITION BET. HAYES & GARFIELD STREETS I
<br /> FROM IA.TH TO 15TH. LOTS 53'XI60' EACH $ 324.21 PLUS COSTS
<br /> 32.1.21 I
<br /> B. LOT 8, BLOCK 3, OPHUS ADDITION 60'xI50'
<br /> I
<br /> SOUTHEAST CORNER 23RD AND FRIENDLY 17.68 PLUS !
<br /> I c. 20'X150' IN 21ST AVENUE, IF EXTENDED WEST I
<br /> I
<br /> FROM FRIENDLY STREET. 75.68 PLUS I
<br /> I
<br /> D. WEST SIDE CLIFFORD STREET BET. 32ND & 33RD. I
<br /> I 60'x81.5' 95.96 PLUS i
<br /> I
<br /> E. HOUSE AT 375 EAST 32ND. 61.5'XI22.7' 435. 13 PLUS !
<br /> I
<br /> I THIS PROPERTY, THE CITY WOULD BE I
<br /> IF PROCURED BY UTILIZED FOR CITY PURPOSES IN
<br /> CONNECTION WITH PARK DEVELOPMENT, STREET OPENINGS, AND POSSIBLE FUTURE FIRE DEPARTMENT i
<br /> I SUBSTATION. IT WAS RECOMMENDED BY THE COMMITTEE THAT THE COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE PROPER ,
<br /> I
<br /> CITY AUTHORITIES TO PURCHASE THESE DELINQUENT PRINCIPLE AND INTEREST PAYMENTS FOR THE I
<br /> BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF EUGE NE. " I
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER,SECONDED BY BOOTH THAT THE REPORT OF THE HEALTH & RECREATION
<br /> AND FINANCE COMMITTEES BE ADOPTED. MOTION CARRIED. I
<br /> ,
<br /> IT WAS MOVED BY CRUMBAKER, SECONDED BY BOOTH THA T THE BIDDING AND PURCHASE OF THE LOTS !
<br /> AT THE FORECLOSURE SALE BE CONFIRMED. ROLLCALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIED. i
<br /> I I
<br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
<br /> 5 A REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS - RE: REQUESTS FROM HALE G. THOMPSON AND MR. MARVIN
<br /> P'QUET WAS SUBMITTED AND READ AS FOLLOWS:
<br /> "THE BOARD OF ApPEALS HELD A MEETING AT THE CITY HALL EUGENE, ON OCTOBER 18, 1951.
<br /> THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS WERE PRESENT: MR. WI LMSEN, MR. VAALAR. MR. GILLILAN AND MR.
<br /> I LUVAAS.
<br /> I
<br /> THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS FOR VARIANCES WERE PRESENTED FOR THE BOARD'S CONSIDERATION:
<br /> I. REQUEST OF MR. HALE G. THOMPSON OF 2362 CHARNEL TON STREET FOR WAIVER OF THE
<br /> FRONTAGE SETBACK PERMITTING HIM TO CONSTRUCT A CARPORT, OVER HIS EXISTING DRIVEWAY. THE
<br /> DRIVEWAY LENGTH FROM THE EAST WALL OF THE HOUSE TO THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE IS A DISTANCE
<br /> OF 32-FEET - THE CARPORT IS TO EXTEND 21 FEET EAST OF THE FRONT WALL OF THE HOUSE, THIS
<br /> WOULD LEAVE A SETBACK OF I I FEET FROM THE PROPERTY. MR. THOMPSON'S DRIVEWAY IS AN
<br /> I EXCAVAT~D DRIVE IN THE BANK WITH SIDEWALLS OF ROCK ABOUT SIX F"EET FROM THE FLOOR OF" THE
<br /> DRIVE TO THE LAWN. THIS WOULD PUT THE ROOF OF THE CARPORT APPROXIMATELY 18 INCHES HIGHER
<br /> THAN THE LAWN AND WOULD NOT OBSTRUCT ANY VIEW OF NEIGHBORING RESIDENCES.
<br /> THE BOARD APPROVED THIS REQUEST AS THE CARPORT WOULD BE BELOW THE NATURAL GROUND
<br /> LEVEL AND THERE IS NO OBSTRUCTION OF VISION TO NEIGHBORING HOMES OR TRAFF"IC.
<br /> ,
<br /> 2. REQUEST OF MR. MARVIN PIQUET WHO OWNS PROPERTY AT 2255 WASHINGTON STREET CONSIST- !
<br /> ING OF TWO LOTS 60 FEET BY 150 F"EET DEEP, WHICH GIVES MR. P'QUET A FRONTAGE OF 120 FEET I
<br /> ON WASHINGTON STREET. I T WAS MR. PIQUET'S REQUEST TO SELL THE SOUTH 50 F"EET OF THIS !
<br /> !
<br /> I PROPERTY RETAINING THE NORTH 70 FEET UPON WHICH IS BUilT HIS RESIDENCE. SINCE THE SOUTH I
<br /> LINE OF THE HOUSE OVERLAPS THE COMMON PROPERTY LI NE BETWEEN THE TWO LOTS IT WOULD NOT
<br /> I
<br /> BE POSSIBLE TO CONVEY A LOT WITH 60 FOOT F"RONTAGE. THE BOARD TOOK NO ACTION ON THIS. i
<br /> DISCLAIMING JURISDICTION. LETTER AND SKETCH ATTACHED. I
<br /> i
<br /> :
<br /> REQUEST OF DR. MCiNTYRE, 2545 LINCOLN STREET i
<br /> 3. TO BUILD A DUPLEX. I
<br /> THERE "
<br /> BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS THE MEETING WAS ADJOURNED. I
<br /> I IT WAS MOVED BY BOOTH, SECONDED BY SMITH THAT THE REPORT OF THE BOARD OF ApPEALS BE
<br /> ADOPTED IN THE REQUEST OF" HALE G. THOMPSON. MOTION CARRIED.
<br /> ":;;.-'.~.t:.;.;,~ii''"'''~-i:,;:~'~ ;"..~.,,'..":\ .;-, ;;';1:Ih;';,~_1i~~....:..~....,. ,_..;..;j.,~~i,.i..;:;:~~":~"';':',._k:_.-,.i~::''''~',-.2I_ ~.,~-iS,,; .' ~~,' _.o.,',.>.,......,'-~~:d:;..,..,_~.""'_"'"';-. ..,,-'~
<br />
|