11/28/1960 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

""IIIIl 9(1 e 11/28/60 - -- - - ----- I" IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 2A Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. B. 21ST AVENUE fROM CITY VIEW STREET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY Of 4TH ADDITION TO HIGHLAND OAKS. I REQUEST fROM A RROPERTY OW~ R AT 2505 WEST 21 ST AVENUE WAS PRES ENTED TO THE COMM I TTEE. THE COMMITTEE REPRESENTAT I VES V IEWED THE AREA AND NOTED THAT THE TERRAIN IS SOMEWHAT STEEP ON BOTH SIDES Of THE STREET AND RECOMMENDED THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED ON 21ST AVENUE fROM CITY VIEW STREET TO THE WEST BOUNDARY Of ~TH ADOITIGS TO HIGHLAND OAKS. M~TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. i- IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 2B Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. 2 C. REQUEST fOR CURB SIDEWALK ON 20TH AVENUE BET~EN JACKSON STREET AND VAN BUREN STREET. A PETITION REQUESTING THAT CURB SIDEWALKS BE ALLOWED ON BOTH SIDES Of 20TH AVENUE BETWEEN JACKSON " AND VAN BUREN STREETS WAS PRESENTED WITH THE SIGNATURES Of THREE PROPERTY OWNERS THE ! IN THE AREA. , " PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT POINTED OUT THAT ONE-Q~~RTER Of T~ BLOCK ALREADY HAS A SIDEWALK, WHICH IS SET BACK fROM THE CURB AND THAT THERE APPE~RED TO BE NO PARTICULAR DiffiCULTIES BECAUSE Of TOPOGRAPHIC e CONDITIONS AS TO WHY STANDARD SETBACK SIDEWALK COULD NOT BE CONSTRUCTED. THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS VIEWED THE PROPERTY AND RECOMMENDED THAT THE PETITION fOR CURB SIDEWALKS BE DENIED AND THAT STANDARD SETBACK SIDEWALKS BE REQUIRED I N THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AREA. M~TION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. " IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEM 2C Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. I" 3 3. REQUEST fOR VACATION Of A 7 fOOT UT[LITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH LINE Of LOT 6, BLOCK 2 SOUTH SIDE HILLS - A PETITION REQUESTING THE VACATION Of A 7 fOOT UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THE SOUTH LINE ~ LOT 6, BLOCK 2, SOUTH SIDE HILLS WAS PRESENTED TO THE COMMITTEE. A MAP WAS SHOWN Of THE AREA AND IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THERE WERE NO KNOWN OBJECTIONS fROM ANY Of THE UTILITY COMPAN I ES WITH RESPECT TO THIS VACATION. THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQU6STEO VACATION BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ! ~ IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAUR I S THAT ITEM 3 Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE en APPROVED. MOTIGN CARRIED. c-J i I'T i-J... 4. CONSIDERATI~N Of PLANNING COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATIONS ON CERTAIN ANNEXATIONS - " =c 4 i CO A. ANNEXATION Of ELKSSLODGE PROPERTY IN WILLAKENZIE AREA. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THIS PRO~ RTY BE APPROVED fOR ANNEXATION ON A CONSENT BASIS AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE APPROVAL Of THE REPORT Of HE PLANNING COMMISSION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 4A Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. .MOTION CARRIED. , 5 B. ApPROVAL Of ANNEXATION OF PARADISE PARK, LOCATED IN THE WILLAKENZIE AREA. THE PLANNING COM- MISSION RECOMMENDED THE APPROVAL ON A CONSENT BASIS Of THE ANNEXATION Of PARADISE PARK SUBDIVISION AND T~ COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THE APPROVAL Of THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 1 IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT ITEM 4B Of THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. MOTION CARRIED. CONSIDERATION Of BIDS ON PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT - 5. 6 A. BIDS ON SEWERODER MACHINE. IT WAS STATED THAT THREE BIDS HAD BEEN RE&EIVED ON A SEWERODER MACHINE, THE LOW BID BEING THAT OF AIR-MAC, INC., BIDDING ON A STEWART MODEL AT A PRICE Of $4,336.00. " THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED THE LOW BID AND T~ COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT THE BID Of THE e AIR-MAC, INC., BE APPROVED AT. .THE UNIT PRICE STATED ABO~ . MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY MANAGER, IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THIS ITEM'BE REfERRED TO THE COMMITTEE Of THE WHOLE. MOTION CARRIED. 7 B. BIDS ON STREET SWEEPERS .HAD ALSO BEEN OPENED A~ FOUR COMPANIES BID ON SEVEN DIFfERENT MODELS OF MACHINES. THE LOW BID WAS ENTERED BY AIR-MAC, BIDDING ON A MOBIL SWEEPER AT A NET PRICE INCLUDING TRADE-IN OF $8,331.00. THE NEXT LOW BID WAS THAT Of FEENAUGHTY MACHINERY, BIDDING ON A WAYNE MODEL 520 AT A NET PRICE Of $9,620.00, WITH OTHER BIDS. RECEIVED BEING IN EXCESS Of THEBE PRICES. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDED THAT THE WAYNE SWEEPER MODEL No. 520 BE ACCEPTED AT A BID PRICE Of $9,620 SINCE IT WAS BELIEVED THAT THE THREE-WHEELED TYPE SWEEPERS ARE MORE PREVALENT IN THE fiELD AND MORE " .' DESIRABLE fROM PAST EXPERIENCEj THAT SHOP PERSONNEL ARE MORE fAMILIAR WITH THIS EQUIPMENT fROM A MAINTENANCE STANDPOINT, SINCE WE HAVE OTHER EQUIPMENT COMPARABLE TO THIS AND SINCE THE LOCATION Of THE GUTTER BROOM ON THE WAYNE SWEEPER IS A DESIRABLE FEATURE BECAUSE IT PROTECTS THE TIRE fROM DAMAGE, WH IC H IS NOT TRUE WITH OTHER SWEEPERS. P,CTORIAL REPRESENTATIONS Of THESE MACHINES WERE ALSO SHOWN, AND THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED THAT 1 THE BID OF FEENAUGHTY MACHINERY COMPANY, BIDDING ON A WAYNE MODEL NO. 520, AT A TOTAL PRICE INCLUDING TRADE-IN, Of $9,620.00, BE APPRO~D. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. SOME DISCUSSION ON SWEEPER SPECltlCATIONS WAS HAD. THE QUESTIONSWAS RAISED AS TO WHETHER SPECifiCATIONS fOR CITY P~RPOSES SHOULD BE GENERAL OR RESTRICTIVE. COUNCILMAN SHEARER POINTED OUT THAT, IN HIS BELIEf, SPECifiCATIONS SHOULD BE MO~ GENERAL IN NATURE, BUT ACTUAL PURCHASE SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO RECOMMENDATIONS Of THE CITY MANAGER, DEPARTMENT HEADS AND, fiNALLY, THE COUNCIL. e IT WAS MOVED BY MR. SHEARER SECONDED BY MRS. LAURIS THAT THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED AND THE BID Of FEENAUGHTY MACHINERY ON A WAYNE MODEL No. 520 STREET SWEEPER, AT A NET PRICE OF $9,620.00 .....4