|
<br />J'::) .-, c:
<br />~Bu
<br />e
<br />
<br />11/27/61
<br />
<br />r ~
<br />I, I~ 1
<br />
<br />I, ON MOLHOLM-SWANSON MOT ION THE COMM ITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REZON I NG J N ,:,
<br />I TEMS A THROUGH D. ::
<br />,
<br />I'
<br />I E. NORTH OF 11TH, WEST OF PATTERSON, SOUTH OF ALLEY BETWEEN 5TH AND 6TH LAND
<br />EAST OF PEAR~FROM 11TH TO 8~H, AND EAST OF ALLEY BETWE~N OAK AND WILLAMETTE
<br />FROM 8TH TO '5TH - C-3P , ,i
<br />2 F. SOUTHWE~T CORNER IjTH AND HIGH - C-3P ;
<br />
<br />ON LAURIS-CHATT MOTION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PROPOSED REZONING .IN ITEMS
<br />E AND F. I
<br />:1
<br />
<br />3 G. AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE - THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED ADDING A NEW
<br />USE TO SECTION V-RA OUTER RESIDENTIAL AND SECTION VI - R-I SINGLE FAMI~Y RES I-I
<br />DENTIAL ALLOWING APARTMENT HOUSES ON TRACTS OF LAND OF 48,000 SQ.FT. OR MORE
<br />WITH A MINIMUM AVERAGE WIDTHOF'150' WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS. THE COMMITTEE
<br />ON MOYER-SWANSON MOTION APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATION.
<br />. ..I. ' I, e
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEMS 3A THROUGH 3G OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE
<br />APPROVED. MOT I ON CARR I ED. :;
<br />
<br />4 ~. VILLARD, FRANKLIN BOULEVARD TO WITHIN 130' OF 15TH AVENUE, LYNN F.BuCKLIN,SR.-
<br />REfERRED BACK TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION BY THE COUNCIL, THE PLANNING COMMIS-
<br />SION NOW RECOMMENDS THE REQUESTED REZONING TO M-I BE DENIED SINCE IT WOULD BE ':
<br />SP<?T ZON I NG AND S I,NCE THERE ARE OTHER- LOCAT 10,,!S I N THE AREA AVA I LABLE FOR A :: 1-
<br />BRANCH U. S. POSTOFfICE.'
<br />
<br />MR. BOBFR~SIER AND MRS.. BENNISTON APPEARED TO SPEAK FOR AND AGAINST iHE ES-
<br />TABLISHMENT OF A BRANCH POSTOFFICE IN THE AREA. THE COMMITTEE ON S~ANSci~-
<br />CHRISTENSEN MOTION RECOMMENDED THE REZONING BE DENIED.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 3H OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED
<br />AND THE REZONING DENIED.
<br />
<br />MR. HAROLD JOHNSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE PETITIONER, PRESENTED SEVERAL POINTS FAVORING REZONING 'AND ALSO
<br />REQUESTED THE COUNCIL TO RECONSIDER THE MATTER WITH THE VIEW OF" REZONING THE AREA TO CR COMMERCIAL
<br />RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT INST~OF" TH~ M-I ORIGINALLY REQUESTED.
<br />
<br />A MR. GEORGE TRAGER AND MRS. BENNISTON WERE ALSO PRESENT OPPOSING THE CHANGE OF CLASSIFICATION.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />ALSO ENTERiNG INTO THE DISCUSSIO~ ~~S MR. .ELDON, REGIONA~ ~EAL ESTATE O~F"lciER .F"OR THE FEDERAL GOVERN- ,
<br />.. .. ' . I'
<br />MENT, WHO GAVE AN EXPLANATION OF THE LEASES WHICH HAD BEEN ACQUIRED F"OR A BRANCH POSTOF"F"ICE AND THE '
<br />ONE EXPIRING IN THE ERB MEMORIAL BUILDING; HE ALSO EXPLAINED THE TERMS OF ANY LEASE WHICH WOULD BE
<br />ACCEPTABLE TO THE GOVERNMENT FOR THIS TYPE INSTALLATION. MR. ETHAN NEWMAN, EUGENE POSTMASTER, ALSO
<br />EXPRESSED HIS OPINION ON THE TENTATIVE.OPERATION OF SUCH A UNIT.
<br />. - ,
<br />
<br />A VOTE ON THE MOTION WAS THEN TAKEN AND THE MOTION CARRIED, MRS. LAURIS, MR. CHATT AND MR. WILSON,
<br />VOT I NG NAY. :; 1--
<br />
<br />5 4. BO~RD OF ApPEALS REPORT, NOVEMBER 10, 1961:
<br />A. SETBACK VARIANCE 2845 SPRING, EDWARD CA~INO -:THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ON MOLHOLM- :: -
<br />SWANSON MOT ION TO APPROVE A 3' SETBACK FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE AT TH I S ADDRESS ;'
<br />AS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD OF ApPEALS, MR. CHRISTENSEN VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 4A OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED. "
<br />,
<br />MOTION CARRIED, MR. CHRISTENSEN VOTING NAY.
<br />
<br />" ~' e
<br />
<br />:: COUNC I LMAN MOYER LEfT THE MEET I NG AT TH I S PO I NT.
<br />
<br />
<br />6 B. SETBACK VARIANCE LOT 4, BLOCK 3, CAPiTAL -HILL ADDITION (CRESTA DE RUTA STREET),
<br />AAGE TOFTEMARK - ON CHATT-LAURIS MOTION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. OF 5'
<br />, .
<br />SETBACK fROM THE fRONT PROPERTY LINE AT THE ABOVE LOCATION AS RECOMMENDED BY THE
<br />BOARD Of ApPEALS, MR. CHRISTENSEN VOTI.NGNAY.
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />j' IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR-. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM 46 OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED, MR. ~HRISTENSEN VOTING ~AY.
<br />
<br />Ii . - . - '
<br />7, C. FENCE VARIANCE 324, DoNALD B. L. FREEMESSER -A VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED
<br />3-1 2' HEIGHT TO ALLOW A 5' FENCE WAS REQUESTED AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS BY
<br />MR. FREEMESSER AND THE BOARD OF ApPEALS APPROVED SINCE THE LOT IS BELOW STREETi
<br />': ~EVEL AND THEPROPOSED fENCE WI LL NOT CREATE A TRAFF I C HAZARD. THE COMM I TTEE ON ;, 1
<br />CHATT-CHRISTENSEN MOTION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.
<br />'I
<br />t ..~-
<br />
<br />IT WAS MOVED BY MRS. LAURIS SECONDED BY MR. MOLHOLM THAT ITEM.~C OF THE COMMITTEE REPORT BE APPROVED.
<br />MOTION CARRIED. ,:
<br />8" 5. PARKING LOT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION WAS HELD ON A PROPOSED,
<br />ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD ENABLE THE CITY TO ESTABLISH_PARKING LOT A~SESSMENT DI~TRICTS, '
<br />AND ON MOLHOLM-SWANSON .MOTION THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF--THE ORDINANCE, I
<br />MR. CHR"STENSEN VOT'~NG NAY. ' . ;1 e
<br />
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|