|
<br />r314,
<br />
<br />_
<br />
<br />5/24/65
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />6. North Bank Park Co~operation Agreement - Copies ,of a proposed agreement between the
<br />City, ,Lane County, and University of Oregon,concerning planning and development of
<br />the North Bank Park area were distributed to Council members for review. The agree-
<br />ment will. be discussed at a "later meeting.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />2
<br />
<br />7. Mission .Street' Reservoir .Site~EWEB - The Eugene Water &' Electric Board 'had -offered' :
<br />the City an area on Mission Avenue for possible park use which EWEB no longer needs
<br />for a reservoir site. The Parks and Recreation Department recommends against using
<br />the site for a park. Mr. Chatt moved seconded by Mr. Anderson to notify EWEB the City
<br />is not interested in using the property. Motion carried. ,
<br />
<br />3
<br />
<br />8. Appointment, Building Code Board of. Appeals,' - Mayor': Cone announced the appointment of
<br />the following named persons as:memhers of the Building Code Board 'of Appeals:
<br />
<br />Richard A. Chambers, 1770 Skyline Boulevard, Builder
<br />Louis F. Bonson, 390 West:23rd Avenue, Designer
<br />William W. Wilson; 2777 Sorrel Way, Engineer
<br />Paul Edlund, 547 Ful-Vue Drive, Architect
<br />Leslie'p. Hardie; 2472:Pioneer Pike,Builder
<br />
<br />- Term expires January 1,1966
<br />" " 1967
<br />" " : 1968
<br />" " 1969 _I
<br />" " 197,0
<br />
<br />Mr. Chatt moved ,seconded by:Dr. Purdy to accept the appointments. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mr. Chatt moved seconded ,by Mr: Crakes to approve Items 6, 7, and 8 of the Committ~e report. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />
<br />4
<br />
<br />9. Sanitary sewer in area between:Coburg Road, Oakwa~ Road, andOakmont Way - This ,petition
<br />was submitted by owners of 100% of the p~operty:to be assessed. Mr. Chatt moved seconded
<br />by Dr. Purdy to approve the petition. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />5
<br />
<br />10. Paving and sewers, 10th Addition to Edgewood Estates - Owners of 78% of the property to
<br />be assessed petitioned this improvement. Expense to the City wa's est imated at $6000
<br />for sanitary trunk sewer, and :$17,000 for :storm sewer. :ThePublic Works Department
<br />recommended, paving Donald Street tnrough:to Fox Hollow Road a,t the same time. Dr.Purdy
<br />moved seconded by Mr.' Chatt to apptove. the petition, including paving Donald Street 'from
<br />Edgewood 10th Addition to Fox Hollow Road. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mr. Chatt moved seconded by Mrs. Lauris to approve Ltems 9' and 10 ,of the :Commit,t:ee 'report. Motion
<br />carried.
<br />
<br />6
<br />
<br />11. :Consultants Review, Central La'ne Planning Council :- Mr,. Simon Eisner,' consultant re.-
<br />tained to St'udy the .Cent:ral Lane Planning Council :operations, :will return :to Eugene
<br />to report on his study and. make recommendations. :The report' will be given at a ~eeting
<br />to be held on Thur-sday, May 20, 1965, 7: 30 p ..in., PDT ,'in the Council Chamber."
<br />
<br />Mr. Chatt moved seconded by Mrs.. Lauris that Item, ,11' be received and placed on file. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Committee meeting held May 20, 1965:
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"Present: Mayor Cone; Councilmen :Chatt, Lauris',: :Crakes, Hawk-, ,Purdy,: Anderson, and 'Lassen;
<br />City Manager ; Administrative Assistant; C.fty ,Attorp.ey;:Ass istant :City :Attorney; :
<br />City Record:er; Assis-tant City Rec'ord:er; Public WorKs :Dir'ector; Downtown 'Study
<br />Committee :members; ~nd others.
<br />
<br />7
<br />
<br />1. Parking AssessmentIDastrict ~ Tt was reported thab since the Aprit 26, 1965 publfc hear~
<br />ing, the Downtown Study Committee had met several times t? review remonstrances presented
<br />at the hearing. The Study Committee now reaffirms its recommendation that,the City move
<br />ahead with the p~oposed .off.-streetparking assessment district as previously presented
<br />to the Council. Speaking as opponents t,o the propos:ed 'dist=rict were Mess'rs:..Paul Lans-
<br />downe, Harold Edmunds, :and Herb Robbins. They 'partfcularly request'ed more time to' :allow
<br />people who had :filed remon:strances at the April: 26 he'ar:ing' to organize' and p:resen:t a
<br />formal protest to the Council; They ~uggested a' 45-day-period fo~ preparing arguments~
<br />Legal quest ions were: answered by the City Attorney, 'andaddit=ional :comment=s wer'e mad'e
<br />by Councilman Hawk, John Porter, Maurie Jacobs, Jack Foster, and Boyd Rasmiiss'en.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. And'erson. moved. seconded by Mr. Chatt that those opposed to. the formation of the
<br />assessment district present a written proposalt'o th'e Council by May 31, 1965, ana
<br />that the Council hold a special meeting on June 7, 1965 to hear any proposals for an
<br />assessment formula d,ifferent tha:n that recommended by the Downt'bw'n Study Committee.
<br />Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mr. Chatt mov'ed seconded by Mr. Lassen to approve Item'l of the Commit,tee report.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr. Donald Husband, attorney, presented a written. statement :to Council members and the staff in which
<br />he requested additional time to' allow the committee lie::was~representing to explore the tax: :angle with
<br />regard to assessments for the parking district vs. a d'irect property' tax. Also, Attorney Ralph Hillier
<br />requested additional time,: pointing out that the Stl.1dy Committee had been meet'ing for' a year: or more
<br />and the opponents would have ten days or less in which to prepare an.:-.altern?te. proposal.
<br />
<br />.Mr. . Anderson moved seconded' bY: Dr. Purdy to amend the Committee- action in Item 1 to have a wrltten.
<br />proposal from opponents of the parking district presented i~the C~bncil not later than June 21, 1965,
<br />and such written proposal to be heard by the Council at its meeting on June 28, 1965. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />5/24/65 - 3
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|