Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />e ' 0301" <br /> <br />-" 8/2~/69u__,. <br /> <br />-- --- ._- -~- ---~.- --- --.-- <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />I . Mr. .Win.gard moved -sei:;:onded by Mr. Gribskov to approve Item 1 of the Committee report. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wingard that the Council request the Weather Bureau,:;press, radio <br />and television to include in formal weather forecasts a prediction of smokiness or smoke dispersal <br />problems. Motion carried.) I <br /> <br />2. Salvage Operation, Highway 99 North - Councilman Gribskov asked that the staff prepare <br />a report on the salvage operation at the overpass of Highway 99 North. Citizens have <br />been complaining about this blight on the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Wingard moved seconded by Mr. Gtibskov to receive and file Item 2 of the Committee report. Motion <br />carried. I <br /> <br />3. Hult Rezoning Request, RA to M-2, West of Wallis Street - Rezoning"has been requested on <br />property south of West 11th for a garage for truck repair and storage. Tabled at the <br />last meeting, pending effort to work out screening problems between Mr. Hult and Mr. <br />Albert Jagger, who is planning a mobile home park to the south of this site. A meeting <br />~ was held with staff in an effort to solve the pboblem. They discussed installation of a <br />twelve foot high fence, but Mr. Jagger does not wish to participate in cost of the <br />installation~ Staff recommends this item be taken from the table and referred back to <br />the Planning Commission, with suggestion conditional use restrictions be placed on <br />property, or another;solution found. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that the Council refer this item back to <br />I the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Wes Morgan stated Mr. Hult's position, and said they preferred a planting buffer, <br />feeling it would provide better insulation, but agreed to the fence, since this was <br />Mr. Jagger's preference. However, they were willing to pay for only 50%, since Mr. <br />Jagger was also required to buffer his property for mobile home park use. Mr. Ray <br />explained that, until the operation starts, there is no way to tell what the noise <br />problem will be. A 12' fence could .even aggravate the problem. The mobile park <br />property has only been given site approval, and has not yet received rezoning. <br /> <br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mr. Wingard moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to refer this item back to the Planning Commission. <br />Councilman Teague said he understood both parties were ~n favor of this action. <br /> <br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Mot~on carried. <br /> <br />4. Taxi Fares, Requested Rate Increas,e - The Manager read a report written by the Director <br />of Finance and explained that rates of neighboring cities had been compared. Based on <br />his study, it is recommended that an increase of 10~ on the first 2/5 mile is justified. <br /> <br />Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Wingard to grant a rate 'increase for taxi 'service, as <br />recommended by staff. Motion carried. <br /> <br />I Mr. Wingard moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to approve Item 4 of the Committee report. <br /> <br />Council President Hayward asked if she was correct in her recollection that Councilman Mcponald was <br />to serve as a committee to investigate taxi rates regarding an increase. City Manager said Mr. <br />McDonald had worked with Mr. Flogstad, and not only studied rates and reports from other cities, <br />but had studied financial problems of taxi companies in the Eugene area. Mr. McDonald participated <br />in the study, and agreed with the recommendation of the Finance Department. <br /> <br />~ Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried. <br /> <br />5. Truck Parking in Residential Areas - The staff has been meeting many months to prepare an <br />ordinance which will accomplish the desired results without creating additional problems. <br />Points of the ordinance were outlined by the City Manager. <br />I <br /> <br />I Councilman Wingard asked if an owner who parked a truck in front of his commercial <br />I property which was within 200 feet of resident~al property, would be in violation of the <br />ordinance. The City Attorney said this particula'r' 'problem had not bee'n' disc'usse'd ,and <br />should probably be considered for change. Mr. Wingard felt the ordinance should be <br />rewritten so that commercial property owners would be allowed to park trucks in front <br />of theit property. I <br />I <br />( Mr. A. W. Krieg felt that no truck parking should be allowed in a residential zone, even <br />on owners prop,erty. <br /> <br />I Mr. Gribskov was concerned that many individuals in the City earn theirU ving' through I <br />owning a truck, and that they will have to rent space to park at night. <br /> <br />In answer to Councilwoman Hayward's quest ion, the City Attorney said it would be p.ossf.ble <br />to add trucks to the section of the Zoning Ordinance which prohibits parking of trailers <br />in the setback. <br /> <br />I Mrs. Hayward moved seconded by Mr. Wingard to set a public hearing on this ordinance, as <br />~ 'I amended, to correct the problem relating to parking in front of commercial property. <br />. Motion carried. <br /> <br />i 8/25/69 .. 2 ...... <br />