|
<br />"ll
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />170
<br />
<br />2/8/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Niven explained the policy ,of scatteration, and.that the planning staff encouraged
<br />developers to select areas which were not already developed in this manner. There
<br />are two considerations - one whether facilities are available, and the other, where
<br />the End is available.
<br />
<br />;,
<br />II
<br />I'
<br />II
<br />"
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson said this discussion did point out that a review of the housing policy,
<br />particularly with relation to controlled. income housing, was certainly in order for
<br />the Council. He suggested that a committee meeting in the near future be set aside
<br />for this purposer He 'suggested 'a joint meeting with the Planning Commission might
<br />be beneficial.
<br />
<br />In answer to Councilman Hershner, Mrs. Niven explained the problem with rezoning the
<br />land, and its immediate increase in valuation.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr was concerned with Council reaction, and suggested the:,~,motion be separated into
<br />two parts - one part with regard to formation ofa special commlttee to deal directly
<br />with the problem of density. The other part would concern the tabling of the ordinance.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson suggested the Council review the zoning ordinance as it exists today, re-
<br />view the housing policy, and possibly go into several case histories to find how the
<br />Planning Commission arrives at the proper density on the basis of present zoning policy.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams suggested the Council go one step further and invite some of the people
<br />in the City who are knowledgeaflle about the subject.
<br />
<br />Mr. Robert Suess, builder, told the Council of some' of his'properties, and their
<br />locations, and invited them to look at them. He explained the density and steps taken
<br />to insure that they were developments to be proud of.
<br />
<br />The Planning Director pointed out that the 1990 Plan considers this issue, and suggested
<br />that discussion of some of its facets might be included'in.the committee report.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams felt this was a good suggestion, and agreed that an analysis of the 1990
<br />Plan would be very helpful to the Council.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the Council table indefinitely consideration
<br />of this amendment to the zoning ordinance. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Teague that the Council request the Planning Commission
<br />to report on density, as it would be related to the 1990 Plan. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />II. Bids, opened by Public Works Department February 2, 1971
<br />
<br />1. PAVING, SANITARY SEWER & STORM SEWER Basic Alt. Cost per sq ft To City Budj.
<br /> Within Sleepy Hollow Addition; &
<br /> san.swr. within 160' N & S of
<br />I Sleepy Hollow
<br />Wildish Cons. Company $18,652.30 $18,594.60 28 'pvg $12.14/frft $566.03 0
<br />Eug Sand & Gravel 20,229.55 19,503.45 SanLat o .044sqft
<br />D & D Backhoe 20 , 751. 02 20,014.26 Service197.67/each lot
<br /> Devereaux & Pratt 21,536.50 20,734.50 Levy 0.005sqft
<br /> Cushing Bros (inc. bid) 21,946.75 20,763.75 Stm. 84.93/each lot
<br /> COMPLETION DATE: 8/1/71
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />2. SANITARY SEWER RECONSTRUCTION
<br />Fairmount Blvd from Birch
<br />Lane to Rose Lane
<br />Shurway Contractors
<br />Kenneth R. Bostick
<br />Wildish Const. Company
<br />D & D Backhoe Servo
<br />Norman J. Green
<br />Cushing Bros, Inc.
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />
<br />$',5,,132.30
<br />6,276.40
<br />6,326.00
<br />7,543.36
<br />8,460.00
<br />9,380.00
<br />10,071.00
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />$5,132.30
<br />(Engineer's Est.
<br />$5,865.50)
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />COMPLETION DATE: 3/22/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />3. In area btn Jefferson St.
<br />from SPRR to 6th Avenue
<br />Kenneth R. Bostick
<br />Wildish Const. Co.
<br />Cushing Bros~ Inc.
<br />D & D Backhoe
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />
<br />& Adams St
<br />
<br />23,423~00
<br />29,326.00
<br />29,346.00
<br />30,423.00
<br />31,827.60
<br />
<br />o
<br />
<br />23,423.00 25,000.00
<br />(Engineer's Est.
<br />$22,215.50)
<br />
<br />COMPLETION DATE: 7/1/71
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4. SANITARY TRUNK SEWER
<br />On Fillmore (ext) from Fillmore
<br />Pump Station to 250' north
<br />Wildish Canst. Co.
<br />D-A-Tone Const. Co.
<br />D & D Backhoe
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />
<br />9,073.28
<br />10,670.00
<br />10,919.90
<br />12,282.00
<br />
<br />o 9,073.28 0
<br />(Engineer's Est.
<br />8,894.00)
<br />COMPLETION DATE: 6/1/71
<br />
<br />2/8/71 - 2
<br />
<br />....
<br />
|