|
<br />\'"
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />51J'~
<br />
<br />4/12/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />'1
<br />11
<br />II
<br />
<br />'\
<br />t!
<br />
<br />City Manager said the legal question
<br />staff indicated there probably was a
<br />Mr. Elfers which is new information.
<br />in approving the subdivision was that
<br />
<br />was hazy and that information available to City
<br />city street. More information has been submitted by
<br />It would appear the intent of the Planning Commission
<br />these would not be corner lots.
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />il
<br />II
<br />I,
<br />i,
<br />"
<br />I'
<br />!
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr, Mohr that the Council deny the appeal from the decision of
<br />the. Zoning Board of Appeals. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />. " II. 'Public He~hg, 'R~cQmin~dati0no:f:"GQ.:diage, Bo-,:'tr:;d to. Es,tablish New Kates
<br />3724/71~*Apropo$e~new rate schedul~ was previously distributed to Councilmen, since the Council
<br />has the authority for regulation.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Mr. Wallace Swanson, Chairman of the Garbage B'oard,Q,utlin~d the.r~port,aT1.d .explained
<br />rates, He commented that there has been some increase in service due to the ban on
<br />burning of clippings and leaves. Rates for apartment houses have not been increased
<br />since 1965. Household rates were increased in 1969, and the increase requested is for
<br />$2.35 per can over the previous rate of $2.10. There was no request for increase for
<br />extra cans.
<br />
<br />In answer to Mr. Mohr, Mr. Swanson said the Garbage ~oard did have a report regarding
<br />\ a recycling proposal, but that he had been requested to withhold it untiil Dr. Car-
<br />michael returned to the Ci ty.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />There was discussion of charges for special hauling of solid waste. Mrs. Beal anq Mrs.
<br />Campbell praised the garbage haulers for their services in this regard, and said they
<br />felt their cooperation had contributed immensely to the success of the burning ban.
<br />
<br />Action will be taken at the regular meeting.
<br />
<br />City Manager express~d appreci'ation for work 'done by the Eugene Garbage Board and
<br />its' chairman. He said complaints are readily accepted and disposed of, and that there
<br />has been a very fine working relationship.
<br />
<br />Res. No. 1910 - Establishing new, garbage rates for'the city of Eugene was submitted.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the resolution be adopted.
<br />
<br />Councilmen were agreed that the garbage haulers had given excellent'service to residents since
<br />initiation of the burning ban. .,
<br />
<br />Councilwoman Campbell had forwarded.a letter to the Garbage Board from Mr. Richard Williams
<br />which had suggestions.regarding increased rates and services. Mr. Swanson, Chairman of the
<br />Garbage Board, said-the suggestions had been good, but with the increase in debris caused
<br />by the burning ban, he did not feel it was a, judicious time to penalize residents for use of
<br />an extra can, Perhaps the suggestions will be incorporated at a later time,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson thanked the Garbage Board for its fine work, and said the ban on backyard
<br />burning has been much more bearable because of the cooperation of the industry and the
<br />Board cooperation.
<br />
<br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried,
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />11.1, Bids, opened by Public Works Department April 6, 1971:
<br />Cost to
<br />Bidder & Project Contract Cost Abutting Prop. To City Budgeted
<br />PAVING:
<br />l,40th Ave. from Densmore to 650'
<br />West '
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel $14,086.36 $13,228.87 36' Pvg $12,40 (alt) 0
<br />Devereaux and Pratt no bid 13,765.82 36' Pvg $13.20 (Basic)
<br />Wildish Canst. Co. 14,293.95 13,775,15 COMPLETION DATE: 9/1/71
<br />
<br />PAVING, SANITARY AND STORM
<br />2.Within Saratoga Park;, and
<br />san swr withi~ 160' So, of
<br />Saratoga Park
<br />Wildish Canst. Co.
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />Devereaux & Pratt, Inc.
<br />
<br />SEWER
<br />
<br />39,528.99
<br />48,614,90
<br />no bid
<br />
<br />40,469.29
<br />48 ,368. 94
<br />48,324.14
<br />
<br />36' Pvg 12 , 47, 0
<br />28' Pvg 12 ,99
<br />San Lat O,052/sq ft
<br />San Serv 155.85/ea lot
<br />San Levy 0.005/sq ft
<br />Stm. Swr 405,39/ea lot
<br />COMPLETION DATE: 9/1/71
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />S'DIDRM SEWER
<br />3.In area betn. Amazon Channel
<br />& 17th Avenue & btn Olive
<br />Street and Willamette
<br />Kenneth R, Bostick Canst. 3,848.90
<br />Shur-Way Contractors 4,278.92
<br />D & D Backhoe 4,537.10
<br />D-A-Tone Canst, Ca, 4,864,00
<br />Wildish Canst, Co. 4,975.50
<br />
<br />Devereaux & Pratt 5,376.00
<br />* Items 'pri.tJ.~ted in. Lt;'!;J-LC~.-.Ji:r;~~ frQm _29mmi~tte~ n:t-P1!J~_,
<br />;;.- ;~-==-:..,. -.l.~=~ :-.. . -. ~.~7:-':..-~- ,. .~.......
<br />"~' ,~ ","" ~-.,-~-~
<br />
<br />3,848.90 3,200,00
<br />
<br />proposed 71-
<br />72 budget)
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />COMPLETION DATE: July 1, 1971
<br />
<br />4/12/71 - 3
<br />
<br />....
<br />
|