Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5G3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4/26/71 <br /> <br />'I <br />I: <br />If <br />ii <br />,I <br />.' <br />, <br /> <br />President on these issues they should write their views. The impact would be much greater <br />than a referendum. <br /> <br />:1 <br />ii <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The second question pertains to the role of the city of Eugene in expressing this type <br />activity. The Council generally refers questions to the voter pertaining to the Charter and <br />amendments thereto. He felt in this instance, referral of the measure would be improper <br />because there is no question before the voters which the city of Eugene has to decide via <br />this vehicle. Secondly, opinions could be expressed more effectively and more accurately <br />and with the same impact on national policy by letter, rather than by this vehicle. Thirdly, <br />the electoral process should not be made into a vehicle for decision making. If this should <br />be placed on the ballot, it should be done through the initiative process, rather than by <br />action of till Council. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal said this expression of oplnlon went far beyond the gallop poll and writing of <br />letters. The people should have an opportunity to express themselves. <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr felt Mr. Williams had narrowed the Council role too finely. The Council has passed <br />many resolutions which went beyond representative opinion, and this was its responsibility <br />where there were no other avenues open to the people. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Hershner agreed with Mrs. Beal concerning the gravity of this issue. He asked what the <br />cost would be of a referendum if handled separately, or with another election. Manager said <br />an election costs about $3,000 or $4,000, and that if this was included on the budget election <br />ballot, it would not increase the cost of that election. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell said in view of the fact that major cities in the United States are spending <br />such large amounts on the war that some are facing bankruptcy, it would be practical to pay <br />attention. She would like the Council to take leadership and respond to the people and <br />place the matter on the ballot with the budget. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to place on the ballot at the coming election the <br />Resolution of the Spring Action Coordinating Committee to end the war in Indochina. <br /> <br />Res. 1922_;- Requesting President Nixon to begin immediately total withdrawal of military <br />forces and material from S.E.Asia and to complete such total withdrawal no later than <br />December 31, 1971. <br /> <br />, <br />': <br /> <br />Councilman Teague said he was sympathetic with the .objecti ve, but he felt it was the wrong <br />thing for the Council to do. The referendum should come directly from the people and the <br />Council could certify it. This would express the will of the people. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell felt the Council should show its leadership. <br /> <br />Mr. Hershner explained that it was his feeling the Council would not be setting a precedent. <br />He voted on each individual thing as it 'came before him, and he did not feel he was binding <br />himself to refer to the people every national issue brought before the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson said the matter of policy had been brought up and he thought this was <br />certainly a valid argument. However, it was his feeling the overriding implications of the <br />issue were one in which the City was deeply involved. He said twenty-four Mayor's from the <br />nations largest cities had gone before Congress asking that the war be stopped with a dead- <br />line. The Country needs to set some priorities and the war is just as much a priority as are <br />urban problems. The p.~ople must directly or indirectly decide. The Council has indicated <br />its beliefs on ballistic missiles, supersonic transports and many others. Mayor Anderson <br />supported this referendum and thought it was a proper one for the City to pursue. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion .to adopt the resolution. Motion carried with Mr. Hershner, <br />Mrs. Beal, Mr. Moh~ and Mrs. Campbell voting aye and Mr. Teague, Mr. McDonald and Mr. Williams: <br />voting no. <br /> <br />tit <br /> <br />B. Resolution requesting City Council to urge Congressman Dellenback to take ,an active part in <br />bringing an immediate end to the war, and urging him to cast an affirmative vote on the <br />Vietnam Disengagement Act of 1971.- Mrs. Hanning explained the resolution and said members <br />of the Spring Action Coordinating Committee would speak to the issue. <br /> <br />Ted Goertzel said this resolution made one demand - that our forces be withdrawn from Vietnam <br />by a specific date. He felt it was important to vote on specific means for ending the war <br />and setting a specific date for withdrawing American troups. The members of the Council owe <br />it to the people to let them see how they stand on this issue. <br /> <br />Heffrey Freed, 2815 Pearl, said the City Council is obligated to prov~de leadership. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Allen Fry, 1010 North "A", Springfield, said he was a combat veteran, and felt the nation <br />should get out immediately, and not wait for political expediency. <br /> <br />John Dorham, student, felt leadership in the community should say something about this to <br />Mr. Dellenback. <br /> <br />Steve Hanning, 1371 West <br />ment if the City Council <br />the vote of the people. <br />being killed in Vietnam. <br /> <br />4th, said the City Manager had suggested it might lead to embarrass- <br />took a position which turned out to be different from that shown by <br />He felt the people were caused more than embarrassment by the numbers <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />4/26/71 - 2 <br />