Laserfiche WebLink
<br />""Il <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />5 70 <br /> <br />4/26/71 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1\ <br />1\ <br />II <br /> <br />I' <br />I <br />I, <br />I, <br />11 <br />'\ <br />'I <br />Ir <br />" <br />II <br /> <br />Mr. Bayard McConnaughey, 1653 Fairmount Boulevard, said this was an illegal and undeclared <br />war which the people are entirelY against. We are fighting remote people who have never <br />been a threat against the United States. <br /> <br />il <br />Ii <br />,I <br />Ii <br />~ ! <br />, <br />" <br /> <br />Father Patrick LaBelle, 1850 Emerald, said that in this Country there has been scarcely <br />any religious tradition that has not spoken directly or indirectly against the war. He <br />felt this was an immoral action which posed a serious question to people. <br /> <br />Marian Barnes, 1859 Lawrence, said Vice President Ky had suggested that Americans would be <br />needed in Vietnam for 15 or 20 years. It was unthinkable to expect prisoners of war to <br />be released while the fighting continued. <br /> <br />Riyhard Malone, 3950 Coburg, said writing of letters was futile, and he could not imagine <br />a higher price to pay than one more life. He had confidence the Council would show people <br />it did care. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Ken Byland, 1110 West 27th, felt the labor force was changing its opinions, and <br />that most are presently against the war. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Sulton, 220 1/2 EIKay Drive, thought the Council should consider life, rather <br />than death. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br />II <br />I' <br />I <br />!I <br />11 <br /> <br />Mike Fox explained that a resolution would be a sort of certification of the Coune;l <br />opinion, and that the people of Eugene were against the war. <br /> <br />Speaking in opposition, Mr. George Boenke, 2130 Agate, felt the Council should concern <br />itself directly with City business, and that they co~ld write individually to repre- <br />sentatives. He felt each individual should do the writing, and not force the Council <br />to take a stand as a whole. . <br /> <br />Harold Moell, 36 Grandview Drive, said what the Council was hearing was the communistic <br />line. <br /> <br />Paul Osburne, 4855 West Amazon, believed the City Council was elected to be representative, <br />and that since they had voted to put this question on the ballot, it would be inappro- <br />priate to represent the people of Eugene until the results of the referendum were known. <br /> <br />Mr; Williams agreed that 100% of the people were opposed to the war. He did not think <br />the question was whether or not to get out of Vietnam, but whether they had faith in <br />the President's time-table and his decision ~n removing us from Vietnam, or whether they <br />were going to "bug-out." The implications should be considered in terms of the impact <br />on the rest of the world. Mr. Williams said the Country had a commitment to Vietnam, <br />which if dishonored, would put the world on notice that our treaty commitments would <br />not be honored. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr felt this resolution was a proper channel for action, but he was concerned with <br />the impact of a divided vote. This would seriously affect the cre&i tabili ty of the <br />Council. Mr. Mohr recommended that the resolution be tabled until a more generalized <br />statement could be prepared which was more impartial in its affect on Mr. Dellenback's <br />vote and would find greater unanimity of opinion on the Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Hershner was concerned that the Council had just voted to refer this matter to <br />the people, and was therefore inclined to vote 'against the resolution. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr movedsseconded by Mrs. Campbell to adopt the resolution presented by the Spring <br />Action Coordinating Committee which urged Congressman Dellenback to cast an affirmative <br />vote on H.B. 4100, the Vietnam Disengagement Act of 1971. <br /> <br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to table the resolution. The motion carried with <br />Messrs. Teague, Mohr, Hershner and Williams voting yes and Mr. McDonald, Mrs. Campbell <br />and Mrs. Beal voting no. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson commented that, since there seemed to be some question how the leadership <br />of the City felt, he wanted to make his feelings a matter of public record. He agreed <br />with tabling of the motion, because he thought the impact of a vote of the people <br />behind the Council would give the Council something on which it could act decisively <br />and effectively. It would be up to the Counicl to determine what should be done with <br />the results of the election and how the results should be transmitted to the leadership <br />of the State and the Nation. He would support a program that would make the results of <br />the election as widely known as possible. He hoped that tabling this resolution was <br />understood to be a matter of procedure and not intended to discourage people in getting <br />their positions knowQ. <br /> <br />A short break was taken. <br /> <br />i <br />" <br />\' <br />Ii <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />II. Planning Commission Reports <br />A. April 6, 1971 <br />1. Zone Change Recommended, Louis Bonson Request. Ea~t side of Bailey Hill Road <br />between 11th Avenue and 18th Avenue. M-2 and,~RA to R-2 SF.' <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Planning Commission recommended rezoning to R-2 SR ..Limi ted Multiple Family <br />Residential District with Site Review Procedure. <br /> <br />4/26/71 -3 <br /> <br />..... <br />