<br />Robert Glass, 258 East 10th Avenue, and John Peterson, 2454 Wilson Drive, felt ,the
<br />benefits to the community would accrue regardless of the building,'s 'location and wondered
<br />whether the building could be located so as not to straddle the ?lley,., , They said closure
<br />of the alley would have direct bearing on their dentistry practice.
<br />
<br />. Mr. Hazen welcomed use by the dentists and their patients of the thoroughfares which
<br />will be provided through his firm's property. He said construction of the building
<br />as planned would not be possible without vacation of the public 'al~ey.
<br />
<br />Manager reported negotiations between Public Works right~of-way agent and Mr. Amacher
<br />resulted in setting a valuation of $15,804.26 for the assessment against abutting prop-
<br />erties, which is the value of the land plus City's cost and assessment, for paving.
<br />
<br />Discussion continued with regard to public access to adjacent dentistry offices, use
<br />of alleys as main thoroughfares rather than service access only, provision for pedes-
<br />trian and bicycle traffic, general vacation of alleys in the downtown area, inconven-
<br />ience to the gene~al public. Councilman Mohr asked who would be responsible for mainte-
<br />nance of the pedestrian and bicycle ways through the Bank I s property. Manager replied
<br />that maintenance could ~e added as a condit'ion of the vacation. He added clarification
<br />of basis on which decision should be made to vacate - only if benefit to the 'public out-
<br />weighs any disadvantage to the public.
<br />
<br />M:r.J:1oh~moved .second~d, by ,Mrs. Beal that the ,bill be read,the seqond time
<br />by council bill number only, with unanimous consent, :of th,e,. 'Counc:i,l, ~nd
<br />that enactment be considered at this time, the ordinance to include condi-
<br />.- tions set forth by, Planning Commission in its recommendation, as well as
<br />,the condition that the property owner maintain ,th~ pedestrian .and picycle"
<br />I ,throughway at his, expense. .
<br />.' . . )
<br />
<br />t f._
<br />,Mr. Mqhr .asked if,~he .$15 ,,80~. 26 assessment would be included, in the vacating ordinance,
<br />and whether ,there would be further opportUn:~,ty fOr'.,rev.iew,of the developmen:t;., plans.
<br />Manager replied that properties abutting the alley on each side would be assessed, and
<br />that only when application is made for the building permit would there be opportunity
<br />: for. further ,review. 'r
<br />
<br />'. " '.',. ,-
<br />
<br />Planning Direc~or explained that normally easements on private property for pedestrian
<br />. .
<br />ways must be maintained by the property owner.
<br />
<br />. . . .' , '
<br />Vote was taken on the ,motion for second reading by co UB ci,J,' bill ~urnbe!',onl-y',
<br />with unanimous consent. Councilmen Hershner and Teague voting no, the bill
<br />was ,held over for second reading. I '"
<br />
<br />
<br />I ~. . ., _
<br />D. Rezoning Property, 120 feet south of 29th Avenue,petween Willa~ette and Portland
<br />(Scott) - Planning Commission July 11, 1972 recommended denial of request to rezone
<br />from RA and R-3 to C-2. Council August 14, 1972 referred to joint session with
<br />. Planning Commission on September 18, 1972. Planning Commission at joint session
<br />reaffirmed its previous recommendation to deny rezoning.
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved 'seconded by Mrs. Beal to sustain the pianning Commission recom-
<br />mendation and deny the rezoning. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />
<br />E. Bid Opening :- Public Works Department
<br />September 19,1972 Contract Cost to Cost to Amount
<br />Project and Name of Bidder Cost Abutting Property City, Budgeted
<br />Storm Sewer
<br />North of Richard Avenue from Fair-
<br />field to Burlington Northern Rail-
<br />road tracks (241-A) ..
<br />Devereaux & Pratt, Inc. $47,852.30 - $47,852.30 $48,000.00
<br />Shur-Way Contractors 49,978.25
<br />Kenneth R. Bostick Construction 55,399'..60
<br />Cushing Bros., Inc. 59,477.00
<br />Wildish Construction Co. 70,716.70 Completion Date: November 15, 1972
<br />
<br />Between Edison and Wood from Burl-
<br />. ington North RR tracks to Bethel
<br />Drive (214-B)
<br />Wildish Construction Co. 41,970.90 - 41,970.90 42,000.00
<br />- Shur-Way Contractors 44,324.90
<br />Cushing Bros., Inc. . 44,432.00 Completion Date: Novemberl5, 1972
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />2 (5 / 9/25/72 - 3
<br />
<br />\ , ----
<br />
|