Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />, '.:' <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell wondere'd h0w the, $350,000 cost of ,widening <br />the northbound ramp from 1st would be ,furide'd and, whether a rail..,. <br />road underp'ass' had ev:er been con:sidered. Mr'. Royer 'explained <br />that if the change is accepted Federal funding maybB a possi- <br />bility, otherwise funds would have to come from State, County, <br />,or City'. Very 'few :chapges have been' approved on Oregon projects <br />by the Secretary of Tran'sportation, he 'said, although contact <br />might be made with this distrist' s congressman in an, attempt <br />to gain approval and fuI1iding. Mr. Royer said several alternaltives <br />were explored for crossing 'the railroad, but water problems'were <br />encountered in considering an underpass. He added, in response <br />to, Mrs; Carnpbell, that ,proper.design, speeds on the ramps, <br />proper clearance for vehicles, arid' other 'safety factors led to <br />the conclusion that the Roosevelt Freeway connection could not <br />co~exist with, the ramps. ' ' ," <br /> <br />In answer to, questions ,from Councilman McDonald, Mr. Royer <br />explained the process for requesting permission from the <br />Secretary or Transportation to retain the ramps, at the same <br />time changing the present contract which calls for,their closure <br />upon opening of'the exterision. He said that approval did .not <br />a:ppear likely by mid-June when the ,extension is scheduled to' <br />open. <br /> <br />Councilman Hershner asked whether the ramps would be allowed <br />to remain 'open after the extension is opened while pursuing , <br />approval of Alternative 2 H.Mr. Royer answered temporary <br />use of the ramps would depend upon the Federal Highway 'A~inis- <br />tration. <br /> <br />Councilman Keller asked if there would be ,a transition period <br />between opening of the extension and closiIlg of the ramps, giving <br />motorists an opportunity to change driving habits. Mr. Royer <br />said the ramps would not meet required safety standards. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded bj Mr~ Williams that disctission <br />be continued at the committee sess:>ion ori Wednesday" May 9,. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray felt the matter should be pursued at this time. <br />Councilman Williams sai~ that in conversation, with Howard Buford, <br />, LCOG transportation.- planner, it was pointed out that, use of ,lst " <br />Avenue as an arterial route would bisect the Whiteaker neighbor- <br />hood to a greater degree than Highway 126 would. Mr. Williams <br />felt more time should be given to cons~deration of 'the alterna- <br />tives presented. Mrs. Campbell expressed the desire forfDlmple <br />time at the continued meeting for full discussion, and possible <br />referral to the Planning Commission and LCOG Transportation <br />Committee and Natural Resources Committee. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the ~otion as stated. Motion carried <br />all councilmen present voting aye, except Murray voting <br />no. <br /> <br />B. Planning Commission Recommendations for Denial (April J, 1973) <br />1. Rezone from R-2 and C-2SR to M-2 area east of Polk and north of <br />Railroad Boulevard (Frank Munn) <br />Petitioner requested postponement. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to postpone <br />consideration of this rezoning to the May 14, 1973 <br />Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. , <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />Rezone from RA to R-2 area west of McMillan and south of 27th <br />(John Quiner) <br />Requested to allow multiple-family development. <br />Public hearing was held. No testimony was presented. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to uphold <br />the Planning Commission recommendation and deny the <br />rezoning. Motion carried unani~ou$ly. <br /> <br />-:--- <br /> <br />, '2.. ~ <br /> <br />4/30/73 - 3 <br />