08/26/1974 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" Kathy Saberhagen, 1010 High Street, said that when zoning of this type was being consi- dered, the neighborhood affected should be consulted for opinion and given opportunity to participate in development of the property. She thought there should be more community "awareness" involved in planning. People should not have to protest, she - said, to be involved in development of an area. The Mayor called attnetion to the efforts of the Planning Commission and staff to provide an opportunity for community involvement before final approval of any project. Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. Council Bill No. 633 - Deleting existing contractual agreement on site development and adding site review procedure to current C-l zoning (C-l SR) on area north of Larch Street, west of West Amazon Drive was read by council bil~ number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Williams moved secdnded by Mr. Hershner that findings supporting rezoning as set out:in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 2, 1974 be adopted by reference thereto, that the council bill be read the second time by council, bill number only, with rmanimous consent of the Council, a.nd that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously; the bill was read the second time by "- council bill number only. :) Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill'be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared (16) passed and numbered 17161. 2. South of West 11th and west of City View from M-2 to C-2 and Outlying Commercial Sign District (McKay) Recommended by the Planning Commission on July 2, 1974. Copies of Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of that meeting were previously distributed to Council members. No ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Council members. .. I Jim Saul, planner, said the rezoning involved about nine acres, almost all developed for commercial uses which became nonconforming upon adoption of the 1968 zoning ordinance. The C-2 zoning was requested to bring the zone into conformance with existing uses. He added that the recommendation for sign district change was also to bring the district into conformance with basic uses of the property and would apply to all of the property except toa depth of 150 feet from_West llth.which would be Highway Oriented. , . Public hearing was opened. (0276 ) Doug-McKay, McKay Investment, owner of the property, said he concurred with the Planning Commission findings. '1 .1, .. l - .Public hearing was closed. Councilman McDonald asked whether the C-2 designation would apply to the Wingard property south of the Amazon Channel. Mr. Saul displayed a vicinity map and said the Wingard property south of the Channel would not be affected, the C-2 zone would apply only to property north of the Channel. Council Bill No. 634 - Rezoning to C-2 area south of West 11th Avenue west of City View with Outlying Commercial, Sign District, except portion fronting on 11th Avenue (to a depth of 150 feet) to have Highway- , ' Oriented Sign District was read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be .read in full. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner th.at findings supporting rezoning as set out in the Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 2, 1974, be adopted by reference thereto, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent' of the Council,! and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the .second time by council bill number only. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Herhsner that the bill be approved and given';'final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the bill was declared - passed and numbered 17162. I 8/26/74 - 3 2.qto